Changes in Disease Activity and Damage Over Time in Patients With Morphea

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

Responsiveness to Change of the Morphea Activity Measure in Pediatric Patients

Importance

Detecting activity of morphea can be complex but is crucial for adequate treatment and outcome assessment. The Morphea Activity Measure (MAM) was recently validated, but its responsiveness to change in disease activity has not been studied.

Objective

To evaluate the internal and external responsiveness of MAM to changes in disease activity in pediatric patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter prospective, longitudinal prognostic study was performed from October 2021 to January 2023 at 4 pediatric referral centers in North America. Consecutive pediatric patients with morphea who were available for data collection at baseline and at a follow-up visit at least 3 months later were studied.

Exposure

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and measurements of disease activity collected at baseline and the subsequent visit.

Main Outcome and Measures

Responsiveness of MAM to disease activity according to the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index (mLoSSI), the Physician Global Assessment (PGA), and a patient and parent global assessment (PtGA) was analyzed using mean and percentage change, standardized effect size, and standardized response mean (SRM) from baseline to follow-up 3 or more months later. Differences between patients whose activity improved vs did not improve were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation between percentage change in MAM score and mLoSSI, the PGA, and the PtGA was calculated using Spearman rank correlation.

Results

A total of 43 patients (mean [SD] age at onset, 7.11 [3.18] years; 26 [60.5%] female) were included. The mean change and percentage change in MAM score were significantly larger in those whose disease activity improved by the PGA (mean: -18.75 [95% CI, -31.92 to -5.57] vs 2.73 [95% CI, -1.97 to 7.45]; percentage: -108.08% [95% CI, -155.21% to -60.95%] vs -24.11% [95% CI, -81.22% to 32.99%]) and by mLoSSI (mean: -24.15 [95% CI, -41.89 to -6.41] vs -1.30 [95% CI, -8.50 to 5.70]; percentage: -172.06% [95% CI, -263.68% to -80.45%] vs -21.57% [95% CI, -48.13% to 4.97%]) than in those whose activity did not change. The SRM of MAM was significantly different between groups for both measures; the responsiveness was large in those whose activity decreased by the PGA (-0.75 [95% CI, -1.29 to -0.22]) and mLoSSI (-0.97 [95% CI, -1.69 to -0.25]) and none to small in those whose activity did not change by the PGA (0.11 [95% CI, -0.08 to 0.30]) or mLoSSI (-0.05 [95% CI, -0.34 to 0.23]). Percentage change in MAM score correlated strongly and significantly with change in mLoSSI (ρ = 0.69; P < .001) and PGA (ρ = 0.65; P < .001), but there was no correlation with change in the PtGA (ρ = 0.26; P = .09).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prognostic study, MAM was found to be internally and externally responsive to changes in disease activity. Further evaluation in mixed cohorts of all ages and specialties is needed.

Use of 3-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry to Detect Disease Progression in Craniofacial Morphea

Importance

Objectively determining disease progression in craniofacial morphea (CM) is challenging, as clinical findings of disease activity are often lacking.

Objective

To evaluate the utility of 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry in detecting disease progression in CM over time.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study included 27 pediatric and adult patients with CM from 2 hospitals in Boston (Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham & Women's Hospital) consecutively enrolled from April 1, 2019, to March 1, 2023. Review of 3D stereophotogrammetry images and data analysis occurred from March 1 to April 1, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Clinical and 3D stereophotogrammetry assessments were performed at 2- to 12-month intervals, depending on the clinical context. The 3D stereophotogrammetry images were then qualitatively rated as demonstrating no progression or definitive progression by an expert (board-certified plastic craniofacial surgeon) and nonexpert (board-certified dermatologist) in 3D stereophotogrammetry. In addition, κ coefficients were calculated for interrater reliability.

Results

Of 27 patients with CM (19 female; median age, 14 [range, 5-40] years) and 3D stereophotogrammetry images obtained from a minimum of 2 time points (median, 4 [range, 2-10] images) spaced a median of 3 (range, 2-12) months apart, 10 experienced progression of their disease based on clinical assessments performed during the study period. In all cases in which clinical progression was favored, blinded qualitative assessment of 3D stereophotogrammetry images also favored progression with substantial interrater reliability (κ = 0.80 [95% CI, 0.61-0.99]). Furthermore, review of 3D stereophotogrammetry detected occult progression of asymmetry not noted on clinical examination in 3 additional patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prospective cohort study, blinded assessment of sequential 3D stereophotogrammetry images in patients with CM not only corroborated clinical assessment of disease progression but also detected occult progression of facial asymmetry not appreciable on clinical examination alone. Therefore, 3D stereophotogrammetry may serve as a useful adjunct to clinical examination of patients with CM over time. Future investigations are warranted to validate 3D stereophotogrammetry as an outcome measure in CM.

Gene Expression Signatures in Inflammatory and Sclerotic Morphea Skin and Sera Distinguish Morphea from Systemic Sclerosis

Morphea is an inflammatory fibrotic disorder of the skin that has been likened to systemic sclerosis (SSc). We sought to examine the molecular landscape of morphea by examining lesional skin gene expression and blood biomarkers and comparing the gene expression profiles with those from site-matched nonlesional and SSc lesional skin. We found the morphea transcriptome is dominated by IFN-γ-mediated T helper 1 immune dysregulation, with a relative paucity of fibrosis pathways. Specifically, expression profiles of morphea skin clustered with the SSc inflammatory subset and were distinct from the those of SSc fibroproliferative subset. Unaffected morphea skin also differed from unaffected SSc skin because it did not exhibit pathological gene expression signatures. Examination of downstream IFN-γ-mediated chemokines, CXCL9 and CXCL10, revealed increased transcription in the skin but not in circulation. In contrast to transcriptional activity, CXCL9 was elevated in serum and was associated with active, widespread cutaneous involvement. Taken together, these results indicate that morphea is a skin-directed process characterized by T helper 1 immune-mediated dysregulation, which contrasts with fibrotic signatures and systemic transcriptional changes associated with SSc. The similarity between morphea and the inflammatory subset of SSc on transcriptional profiling indicates that therapies under development for this subset of SSc are also promising for treatment of morphea.

Color Doppler Ultrasound Assessment of Subclinical Activity With Scoring of Morphea

BACKGROUND

Detection of activity in morphea is paramount for adequately managing the disease. Subclinical ultrasound involvement on inactive lesions or healthy skin areas adjacent to morphea has not been described to date.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to detect morphea's subclinical activity by Color Doppler ultrasound not identified with the clinical scorings.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This cross-sectional retrospective study was done from January 2014 to July 2019 in patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of morphea. The modified Localized Scleroderma Skin Severity Index (mLoSSI) and The Ultrasound Morphea Activity Score (US-MAS) were used to correlate clinical and subclinical activity.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients met the inclusion criteria. 54% of cases presented subclinical activity in areas adjacent to the clinically active lesion, 23% in nonadjacent regions, and 23% demonstrated activity at a clinically inactive lesion site.100% of patients with morphea "en coup de sabre" involving the frontal region of the face concomitantly presented both subclinical activities of morphea on the frontal facial region and the scalp following the same axis.A positive relationship was observed between the degree of clinical activity measured by mLoSSI and US-MAS scoring.The main limitations of our study were the low number of patients and the inability to detect alterations < 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical activity is frequent in morphea, can extend beyond the lesional areas, including apparently noninvolved adjacent and distant corporal regions, and can be detected by color Doppler ultrasound.

Intramuscular Polydeoxyribonucleotides in Fibrotic and Atrophic Localized Scleroderma: An Explorative Prospective Cohort Study

Effective options in the quiescent, scantily inflammatory phase of localized scleroderma (morphea) are lacking. A cohort study in patients with histologically confirmed fibroatrophic morphea explored the therapeutic value of the anti-dystrophic A2A adenosine agonist polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN, one daily 5.625 mg/3 mL ampoule for 90 days with a three-month follow-up). Primary efficacy endpoints: Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool mLoSSI and mLoSDI subscores for disease activity and damage in eighteen areas; Physicians Global Assessment for Activity (PGA-A) and Damage (PGA-D) VAS scores; skin echography. Secondary efficacy endpoints: mLoSSI, mLoSDI, PGA-A, PGA-D, and morphea areas (photographs) over time; Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); skin biopsy scores and induration over time. Twenty-five patients enrolled; 20 completed the follow-up period. Highly significant improvements at the end of the 3-month treatment period: mLoSSI-73.7%, mLoSDI-43.9%, PGA-A-60.4%, PGA-D-40.3%, with further improvements at follow-up visit for all disease activity and damage indexes. Overall, the outcomes suggest that a daily PDRN ampoule intramuscularly for 90 days reduces disease activity and damage rapidly and significantly in quiescent, modestly inflammatory morphea with few currently therapeutic options. The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns caused difficulties in enrollment, and some patients were lost to follow-up. Due to low final enrollment, the study outcomes may have only an exploratory value, yet they appear impressive. The anti-dystrophic potential of the PDRN A2A adenosine agonist deserves further in-depth exploration.

Development and Validation of the Morphea Activity Measure in Patients With Pediatric Morphea

Importance

Morphea is an insidious inflammatory disorder of the skin and deeper tissues. Determining disease activity is challenging yet important to medical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Objective

To develop and validate a scoring tool, the Morphea Activity Measure (MAM), to evaluate morphea disease activity of any type or severity that is easy to use in clinical and research settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This pilot diagnostic study was conducted from September 9, 2019, to March 6, 2020, in 2 phases: development and validation. During the development phase, 14 morphea experts (dermatologists and pediatric dermatologists) used a Delphi consensus method to determine items that would be included in the MAM. The validation phase included 8 investigators who evaluated the tool in collaboration with 14 patients with pediatric morphea (recruited from a referral center [Medical College of Wisconsin]) during a 1-day in-person meeting on March 6, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

During the development phase, online survey items were evaluated by experts in morphea using a Likert scale (score range, 0-10, with 0 indicating not important and 10 indicating very important); agreement was defined as a median score of 7.0 or higher, disagreement as a median score of 3.9 or lower, and no consensus as a median score of 4.0 to 6.9. During the validation phase, reliability (interrater and intrarater agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients), validity (using the content validity index and κ statistics as well as correlations with the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity using Spearman ρ coefficients), and viability (using qualitative interviews of investigators who used the MAM tool) were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative variables. Data on race and ethnicity categories were collected but not analyzed because skin color was more relevant for the purposes of this study.

Results

Among 14 survey respondents during the development phase, 9 (64.3%) were pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists. After 2 rounds, a final tool was developed comprising 10 items that experts agreed were indicative of morphea activity (new lesion in the past 3 months, enlarging lesion in the past 3 months, linear lesion developing progressive atrophy in the past 3 months, erythema, violaceous rim or color, warmth to the touch, induration, white-yellow or waxy appearance, shiny white wrinkling, and body surface area). The validation phase was conducted with 14 patients (median age, 14.5 years [range, 8.0-18.0 years]; 8 [57.1%] female), 2 dermatologists, and 6 pediatric dermatologists. Interrater and intrarater agreement for MAM total scores was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.681-0.942) for interrater agreement and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.791-0.901) for intrarater agreement. Correlations between the MAM and the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index (Spearman ρ = 0.747; P < .001) and the MAM and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity (Spearman ρ = 0.729; P < .001) were moderately strong. In qualitative interviews, evaluators agreed that the tool was easy to use, measured morphea disease activity at a single time point, and should be responsive to changes in morphea disease activity over multiple time points.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, the MAM was found to be a reliable, valid, and viable tool to measure pediatric morphea activity. Further testing to assess validity in adults and responsiveness to change is needed.

Morphea: The 2023 update

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, is a chronic inflammatory connective tissue disorder with variable clinical presentations, that affects both adults and children. It is characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and underlying soft tissue, in certain cases even of the surrounding structures such as fascia, muscle, bone and central nervous system. While the etiology is still unknown, many factors may contribute to disease development, including genetic predisposition, vascular dysregulation, T_H1/T_H2 imbalance with chemokines and cytokines associated with interferon-γ and profibrotic pathways as well as certain environmental factors. Since the disease may progress to permanent cosmetic and functional sequelae, it is crucial to properly assess the disease activity and to initiate promptly the adequate treatment, thus preventing subsequent damage. The mainstay of treatment is based on corticosteroids and methotrexate. These, however, are limited by their toxicity, especially if applied long-term. Furthermore, corticosteroids and methotrexate often do not sufficiently control the disease and/or the frequent relapses of morphea. This review presents the current understanding of morphea by discussing its epidemiology, diagnosis, management and prognosis. In addition, it will describe recent pathogenetic findings, thus proposing potential novel targets for therapeutic development in morphea.

Pediatric morphea state-of-the-art literature review: Reframing morphea as a systemic disease

Pediatric morphea is an inflammatory, fibrosing dermatologic disorder. Although morphea may be localized to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, differentiating it from systemic sclerosis, there is increasing evidence that morphea is a manifestation of a systemic inflammatory process, with the potential to involve many organ systems. Given the potential risk for irreversible sequelae, pediatric morphea should be treated early and aggressively. Long-term disease monitoring is essential.

Diagnosis and management of morphoea in children: an overview

Paediatric morphoea (localized scleroderma) is an inflammatory sclerosing disorder of the skin and subcutis associated with tissue atrophy. It is thought that the disease develops on the background of genetic predisposition (e.g. mosaicism for the common linear variant) initiated by various trigger factors, and that detected autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines represent secondary epiphenomena. In contrast to the common belief that morphoea is a benign self-limiting disorder, long-term data indicate that its chronicity, relapsing nature and extracutaneous complications lead to significant morbidity, particularly when the disease starts in early childhood. Early recognition may be challenging, and the most important clinical clues are band-like distribution, atrophy of underlying tissue, skin sclerosis, and localized loss of body/scalp hair, eyelashes or eyebrows. Extracutaneous manifestations occur in up to 20% of patients, with arthritis/arthralgia and neurological symptoms being most frequently observed, followed by ophthalmological complications such as uveitis. Corticosteroids and methotrexate are highly effective as first-line therapy in morphoea, leading to partial reversal of skin manifestations. However, the development of atrophy is not sufficiently prevented by standard therapy. There is a relapse rate of 25%-48% within the first years after stopping treatment, thus long-term follow-up is warranted. Mycophenolate mofetil seems to be a beneficial second-line therapy, and a new drug, abatacept, also seems to be a promising and well-tolerated second-line treatment option. Additionally, autologous fat injections are beneficial and may be used as an adjunct to ongoing therapy.

Morphea: progress to date and the road ahead

Morphea is a rare autoimmune condition causing inflammation and sclerosis of the skin and underlying soft tissue. It is characterized by periods of activity (inflammation admixed with fibrosis), ultimately resulting in permanent damage (pigment change and tissue loss). Damage resulting from unchecked activity can lead to devastating, permanent cosmetic and functional sequelae including hair loss; cutaneous, soft tissue and bony atrophy; joint contractures; and growth restriction of the affected body site in children. This makes the early identification of activity and initiation of appropriate treatment crucial to limiting damage in morphea. To this end, recent investigative work has focused on validation of clinical, biomarker, imaging, and histologic outcomes aimed at accurately quantifying activity and damage. Despite promising results, further work is needed to better validate these measures before they can be used in the clinic and research settings. Although there has been recent approval of less toxic, targeted therapies for many inflammatory skin conditions, none have been systematically investigated in morphea. The mainstays of treatment for active morphea are corticosteroids and methotrexate. These are often limited by substantial toxicity. The paucity of new treatments for morphea is the result of a lack of studies examining its pathogenesis, with many reviews extrapolating from research in systemic sclerosis. Recent studies have demonstrated the role of dysregulated immune and fibrotic pathways in the pathogenesis of morphea, particularly interferon (IFN) gamma related pathways. Active morphea lesions have been found to display an inflammatory morphea signature with CXCR3 receptor ligands, as well as a distinct fibrotic signature reflecting fibroblast activation and collagen production. CXCL9 and 10 have been associated with increased measures of disease activity. While immune dysfunction is thought to play the primary role in morphea pathogenesis, there are other factors that may also contribute, including genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and vascular dysregulation. There remains an essential need for further research to elucidate the pathogenesis of morphea and the mode of action of dysregulated upstream and downstream immune and fibrotic pathways. These studies will allow for the discovery of novel biomarkers and targets for therapeutic development.