Chronic Pain in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Explained Through the Process of Central Sensitization

Fibromyalgia in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

This case-control study compares the prevalence of fibromyalgia between adults with hidradenitis suppurativa and adults with non–pain-related conditions.

Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction Associated With Intramuscular Triamcinolone Therapy for Acute Flares of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

BACKGROUND

A lack of consensus exists regarding acute flare management in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Intramuscular triamcinolone (IMTAC) therapy is useful in numerous inflammatory conditions; however, it has not been investigated for acute HS flares.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and patient experience associated with IMTAC therapy for acute, severe HS flares.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis and surveys of 45 HS patients were conducted at Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore HS Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

RESULTS

Follow-up visits 6.77 (4.45) weeks after IMTAC therapy revealed significant reductions in mean HS-Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (P < .001), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (P = .03), increased hemoglobin (P = .004), and improved pain scores (P < .001). Adjusting for age, sex and concomitant medications, multivariate analysis yielded significantly reduced pain (P = .02) and increased hemoglobin (P = .03). Patient surveys indicate that IMTAC was well-tolerated, as reflected in positive mean responses for satisfaction (29 [64%]) and willingness to receive IMTAC injections again (42 [93%]).

CONCLUSIONS

These novel findings demonstrate that IMTAC is a safe, effective, and well accepted adjunct for acute HS management.

Pain measurement in painful skin conditions and rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trials: a scoping review to inform pain measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most common and bothersome symptom experienced by people with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and has been prioritized as an outcome domain by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC).

OBJECTIVES

To perform a scoping review of pain measurement in randomized control trials (RCTs) of painful skin conditions (PSCs) and use of the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in rheumatoid arthritis RCTs, to inform the efforts of HISTORIC to reach consensus on how to measure pain intensity in HS trials.

METHODS

A search was conducted on several publication databases. Inclusion criteria were RCTs with a minimum of 10 participants that measured pain intensity.

RESULTS

Pain NRS and VAS were used in 68% of PSC trials. Respectively, 77% and 87% of PSC and rheumatoid arthritis RCTs did not specify the recall window. The commonest recall window in PSCs when specified was 24 h. In total, 33% of PSC trials assessed maximum pain intensity and 3% average pain intensity, while 87% of rheumatoid arthritis trials did not provide details. Pain data were reported as mean difference by 76% of PSC trials and 75% of rheumatoid arthritis trials. Respectively, 10% and 11% of PSC and rheumatoid arthritis studies reported pain as the percentage of patients reaching a desirable state and only 1% and 2% reported number needed to treat.

CONCLUSIONS

While pain NRS and VAS are standard methods to measure pain intensity in PSCs, key details such as the recall window are often omitted and there is no consensus on how to report pain NRS data. What is already known about this topic? Pain is the most burdensome symptom experienced by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and has been prioritized as an outcome domain by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). What does this study add? Our review shows substantial variation in how pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale are utilized in clinical trials. This variation restricts meta-analysis of pain intensity results. There is a need for consensus regarding the recall window for pain NRS and maximum vs. average pain, and whether current pain should be measured.

Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by the formation of comedones, papules, nodules, abscesses and sinus tracts in the axillary, inframammary, groin, and gluteal areas. Up to 3.8% of the Canadian population has HS, though due to a lack of awareness of HS, many patients are initially misdiagnosed and do not receive adequate treatment early on in the disease course. Once a diagnosis of HS is made, developing an effective management plan can be a dilemma for many providers. There is significant variability in response to any given therapy within the HS patient population and many HS patients have other medical comorbidities which must be taken into consideration. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for all healthcare providers to diagnose and manage HS and its associated comorbidities. A sample electronic medical record template for HS management was developed by the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Executive Board and is intended for use in clinical settings. This will help to increase collaboration between primary healthcare providers, dermatologists, and other medical specialists and ultimately improve the quality of care that HS patients receive.

New treatments and new assessment instruments for hidradenitis suppurativa

Research interest in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) has grown exponentially over the past decades. Several groups have worked to develop novel scores that address the drawbacks of existing investigator assessed and patient reported outcome measures currently used in HS trials, clinical practice and research. In clinical trial settings, the drawbacks of the HiSCR have become apparent; mainly it's lack of a dynamic measurement of draining tunnels. The newly developed (dichotomous) IHS4 and HASI-R are backed up by adequate validation data and are good contenders to become the new primary outcome measure in HS clinical trials. Patient reported outcomes, as well as physician reported measures, are being developed by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). For example, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL) score is a validated measure of HS-specific quality of life and is already being used in many HS trials. Magnitude of pain measurement via a 0-10 numerical rating scale is well-established, however consensus is still required to ensure consistent administration and interpretation of the instrument. A longitudinal measurement over multiple days rather than at one time point, such as for example the Pain Index could provide increased reliability and reduced recall bias. Ultimately, these newly developed scores and tools can be included in a standardized registry to be used in routine clinical practice.

Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain and Related Characteristics in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Pain is a core symptom of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and is of complex, multifactorial origin. HS patients frequently report typical neuropathic pain qualities, but its prevalence has been poorly described.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we examine the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NP) component and related pain-characteristics of a hospital-based cohort of patients with symptomatic HS. We administered the pain-DETECT tool (PDQ), a validated screening tool for NP, collecting clinical and patient-reported data on pain, pruritus and pain-management. We obtained 110 complete datasets from symptomatic HS patients (49.1% females; Hurley I (27.3%])-II (45.5%)-III (27.3%)). According to the PDQ tool, 30% of patients were classified with a high probability (>90%) of neuropathic pain (LNP). LNP status was significantly associated with increased pain severity, disease activity, pruritus intensity and use of pain medication. Regression analysis showed a significant impact of the PDQ score on patient-reported outcomes, including pain severity and the dimensions of activity and affective pain interference. HS patients may present a mixed chronic pain phenotype with a neuropathic component, thus requiring additional pain-assessments. A multi-modal approach to pain management, in combination with disease-specific treatment, should be implemented in future interventional studies.

Pain management in hidradenitis suppurativa and a proposed treatment algorithm

Pain contributes substantially to reduced quality of life in individuals living with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although improved understanding of HS pathogenesis and treatment has resulted in improved evidence-based HS management guidelines, comprehensive pain management guidelines have yet to be developed. Few HS-specific data exist to guide pharmacologic analgesia; however, recognizing HS pain as either acute or chronic and predominantly nociceptive (aching and gnawing pain due to tissue damage) versus neuropathic (burning-type pain due to somatosensory nervous system dysfunction) provides a conceptual framework for applying outside pain management practices to HS management. This article incorporates the best available evidence from the HS and pain literature to propose an HS pain algorithm that integrates psychological, pharmacologic, and complementary and alternative treatment modalities.

The most recent advances in understanding and managing hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicle unit that typically develops after puberty. HS has a significant negative impact on both the quality of life (QOL) of patients affected by this disease as well as family members and caregivers. However, the pathogenesis of HS is multifactorial and still remains to be fully elucidated, which makes the development of treatments difficult. The last 10 years have seen a surge in HS research, and many new findings have come to light, yet much more remains to be elucidated. Physicians must employ a multidisciplinary approach to maximally address all facets of HS. Clinical characteristics of the disease that differ between females and males as well as across different races and ethnic groups must be considered. Targeted topical, oral, and injectable therapies continue to be developed for HS as a greater understanding of the pathogenesis is reached. However, randomized controlled trials regarding dietary factors that may contribute to HS are needed to meet our patients’ growing concerns and questions about the role of diet in HS pathogenesis. Finally, improved outcome measures are needed to standardize HS severity and grading between physicians and clinical trials, and a more diverse representation of HS populations is needed in clinical trials.