Dermatopathologist Perceptions of Overdiagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions and Association With Diagnostic Behaviors

Survival trends for patients diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma in the Nordic countries 1990-2016: The NORDCAN survival studies

BACKGROUND

The survival in patients diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) has improved in the Nordic countries in the last decades. It is of interest to know if these improvements are observed in all ages and for both women and men.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CMM in the Nordic countries in 1990-2016 were identified in the NORDCAN database. Flexible parametric relative survival models were fitted, except for Iceland where a non-parametric Pohar-Perme approach was used. A range of survival metrics were estimated by sex, both age-standardised and age-specific.

RESULTS

The 5-year relative survival improved in all countries, in both women and men and across age. While the improvement was more pronounced in men, women still had a higher survival at the end of the study period. The survival was generally high, with age-standardised estimates of 5-year relative survival towards the end of the study period ranging from 85% in Icelandic men to 95% in Danish women. The age-standardised and reference-adjusted 5-year crude probability of death due to CMM ranged from 5% in Danish and Swedish women to 13% in Icelandic men.

CONCLUSION

Although survival following CMM was relatively high in the Nordic countries in 1990, continued improvements in survival were observed throughout the study period in both women and men and across age.

The dermatopathologist-patient consultation program: A pilot study on patient perspectives and interest

BACKGROUND

Despite the integral contribution of dermatopathologists in diagnosing skin lesions, their role often remains unclear to patients, likely due to little face-to-face interaction. More healthcare systems have begun introducing patient-pathologist consultation programs that allow patients to discuss results with a pathologist and view tissue under a microscope. To our knowledge, only one study has been published exploring patient perspectives of these programs and no studies exist regarding interest in dermatopathology.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was distributed via online support groups for various dermatologic diagnoses.

RESULTS

Patients demonstrated a high level of interest in the dermatopathologist-patient consultation program, with 81.3% expressing at least moderate interest in discussing their diagnosis with a dermatopathologist and 79.2% expressing at least moderate interest in examining their tissue under the microscope with a dermatopathologist. The rationale for interest included various themes: (1) knowledge/understanding, (2) empowerment, (3) emotional support, (4) general interest, and (5) improved trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancerous and non-cancerous dermatologic diagnoses demonstrate high interest in a dermatopathologist-patient consultation program. Efforts to pilot this type of program can build upon the infrastructure of current pathologist consultation programs. Future efforts should be taken by hospital leadership, clinicians, and dermatopathologists to determine physician interest and address logistical challenges to the implementation of these programs.

Overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to systematically identify and scrutinise published empirical evidence about overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma and examine how frequent overdiagnosis of melanoma is and whether this is related to different types of interventions or diagnostic technologies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Empirical studies that discussed overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma were eligible, including qualitative and quantitative studies in any type of population, age group and geographical location. We excluded studies that did not include empirical data, studies that only mentioned 'overdiagnosis' without addressing it further and studies that used the term overdiagnosis for cases of misdiagnosis or false positives.We developed the search strategy in cooperation with an information specialist. We searched five databases on 21 April 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library.This scoping review adheres to The JBI methodology and Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for inclusion and extracted data from the included studies. The data extracted include study characteristics, population details, research question, the context and the study's main results.

RESULTS

Our search resulted in 1134 potentially relevant studies. 35 studies were included: 29 register studies, 3 cohort studies, 1 case-control study, 1 survey study and 1 randomised controlled trial. Most register studies examined trends in melanoma incidence and/or mortality and found a significant increase in incidence between 0.39% and 6.6% annually and a little or no increase in mortality. Three cohort studies and one case-control study showed that skin screening was associated with increased detection of melanoma; especially in situ or thin invasive melanoma. Three studies estimated the degree of overdiagnosis which ranged from 29% to 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidemiological data suggest a high degree of overdiagnosis in malignant melanoma. Studies that examined the association between skin screening and malignant melanoma all found increased detection of melanomas, mostly thin and in situ melanomas, which raises concern about overdiagnosis.

Pathologist Characteristics Associated With Rendering Higher-Grade Diagnoses for Melanocytic Lesions

Importance

The incidence of melanoma diagnoses has been increasing in recent decades, and controlled studies have indicated high histopathologic discordance across the intermediate range of melanocytic lesions. The respective causes for these phenomena remain incompletely understood.

Objective

To identify pathologist characteristics associated with tendencies to diagnose melanocytic lesions as higher grade vs lower grade or to diagnose invasive melanoma vs any less severe diagnosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This exploratory study used data from 2 nationwide studies (the Melanoma Pathology [M-Path] study, conducted from July 2013 to May 2016, and the Reducing Errors in Melanocytic Interpretations [REMI] study, conducted from August 2018 to March 2021) in which participating pathologists who interpreted melanocytic lesions in their clinical practices interpreted study cases in glass slide format. Each pathologist was randomly assigned to interpret a set of study cases from a repository of skin biopsy samples of melanocytic lesions; each case was independently interpreted by multiple pathologists. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to February 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The association of pathologist characteristics with diagnosis of a study case as higher grade (including severely dysplastic and melanoma in situ) vs lower grade (including mild to moderately dysplastic nevi) and diagnosis of invasive melanoma vs any less severe diagnosis was assessed using logistic regression. Characteristics included demographics (age, gender, and geographic region), years of experience, academic affiliation, caseload of melanocytic lesions in their practice, specialty training, and history of malpractice suits.

Results

A total of 338 pathologists were included: 113 general pathologists and 74 dermatopathologists from M-Path and 151 dermatopathologists from REMI. The predominant factor associated with rendering more severe diagnoses was specialist training in dermatopathology (board certification and/or fellowship training). Pathologists with this training were more likely to render higher-grade diagnoses (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% CI, 2.10-3.30; P < .001) and to diagnose invasive melanoma (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.53-2.49; P < .001) than pathologists without this training interpreting the same case. Nonmitogenic pT1a diagnoses (stage pT1a melanomas with no mitotic activity) accounted for the observed difference in diagnosis of invasive melanoma; when these lesions, which carry a low risk of metastasis, were grouped with the less severe diagnoses, there was no observed association (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.23; P = .71). Among dermatopathologists, those with a higher caseload of melanocytic lesions in their practice were more likely to assign higher-grade diagnoses (OR for trend, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.56; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that specialty training in dermatopathology is associated with a greater tendency to diagnose atypical melanocytic proliferations as pT1a melanomas. These low-risk melanomas constitute a growing proportion of melanomas diagnosed in the US.

Impact of second opinion pathology review in the diagnosis and management of atypical melanocytic lesions: A prospective study of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) and EORTC Melanoma Group

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of an expert pathological review in patients with an atypical melanocytic lesion diagnosis remains unclear. Herein, we evaluate its impact in a prospective clinical study.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed or suspected atypical melanocytic proliferations and challenging skin tumours were reviewed prospectively by a specialised dermatopathologist through the nationwide 'Second Opinion Platform' of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) network. The primary aim was the rate of major discrepancies that impacted patient management. Major discrepancies in diagnosis between referral and specialised review were blindly re-analysed by a panel of European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC) Melanoma pathologists.

RESULTS

The samples submitted to central review included 254 lesions from 230 patients. The most frequent referral diagnoses were atypical melanocytic nevi of different subtypes (74/254, 29.2%), invasive melanomas (61/254, 24.0%), atypical melanocytic proliferations (37/254, 14.6%), AST (21/254, 8.3%) and in situ melanomas (17/254, 6.7%). There was disagreement between referral diagnosis and expert review in 90/254 cases (35.4%). Most importantly, 60/90 (66.7%) were major discordances with a change to the patient's clinical management. Among the 90 discordant cases, the most frequent new diagnosis occurred in World Health Organisation (WHO) Pathway I, followed by WHO Pathway IV (64/90 and 12/90, respectively). In total, 51/60 cases with major discrepancies were blindly re-evaluated by EORTC Melanoma pathologists with a final interobserver agreement in 90% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights that a second opinion for atypical melanocytic lesions affects clinical management in a minor, but still significant, proportion of cases. A central expert review supports pathologists and clinicians to limit the risk of both over- and under-treatment.

The benefit of early-stage diagnosis: A registry-based survey evaluating the quality of life in patients with melanoma

Background

The morbidity associated with advanced stage melanoma is an important consideration in the dialog surrounding early detection and overdiagnosis. Few studies have stratified melanoma patient quality of life (QoL) by stage at diagnosis.

Objective

We sought to investigate if melanoma stage is independently associated with changes in QoL within a large, community-based melanoma registry. Secondarily, we investigated whether demographic factors such as age, geographic location or level of education are associated with changes in QoL in the same population.

Methods

1108 melanoma patients were surveyed over a three-month period using the QoL in Adult Cancer Survivors Survey, consisting of 47 items on a 7-point frequency scale. Data were analysed using both descriptive statistical models and adjusted multivariate logistic regression.

Results

There were 677 respondents generating a 61% response rate. Overall, higher stage at diagnosis correlated with the largest decreases in QoL as it pertained to both general (p = 0.001) and Cancer-Specific stressors (p < 0.001). Education level (p = 0.020), age (p < 0.001), rural area code designation (p = 0.020) and family history of melanoma (p = 0.017) were also independently associated with changes in QoL.

Conclusion

Earlier stage at melanoma diagnosis is associated with better QoL and thus represents a crucial intervention in patient care. Given our findings and the growing body of evidence surrounding morbidity in late-stage melanoma, it is essential that QoL be included in assessing the benefits of early detection.

Incidence of in Situ vs Invasive Melanoma: Testing the "Obligate Precursor" Hypothesis

Background

Melanoma incidence has been rising in populations with predominantly European ancestry (White), speculated to be partly driven by heightened detection of indolent tumors. If in situ melanomas are destined to evolve to invasive cancers, detecting and removing them should deplete the pool of invasive lesions, and people with in situ melanoma should, on average, be younger than those with invasive melanoma.

Methods

We analyzed long-term incidence trends (1982-2018) for in situ and invasive melanomas in 3 predominantly White populations with high, medium, and low melanoma rates: Queensland (Australia), United States White, and Scotland. We calculated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of in situ to invasive melanomas and estimated the contributions of age, period, and cohort effects. We compared age at diagnosis of in situ vs invasive melanomas overall and stratified by sex and anatomic site.

Results

In all 3 populations, the in situ to invasive incidence rate ratio increased statistically significantly from less than 0.3 in 1982 to 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.88 to 2.02) in Queensland, 0.93 (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.96) in the US White population, and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.63) in Scotland in 2018. The mean age at diagnosis of in situ melanomas was the same or higher than invasive melanomas for almost all time periods among men and women and on all body sites except the lower limbs.

Conclusions

The increasing ratio of in situ to invasive melanoma incidence over time, together with the high (and increasing) mean age at diagnosis of in situ melanomas, is consistent with more indolent lesions coming to clinical attention than in previous eras.