Comparison of Posthospitalization Function and Community Mobility in Hospital Mobility Program and Usual Care Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mobility Loss in Hospitalized Adults Predicts Poor Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The Johns Hopkins Activity and Mobility Program is a systematic approach to measure and improve patient mobility.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between mobility loss and quality outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study design was used. Patients were categorized into 3 groups (gain, loss, no change in mobility) using the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scores. The association between mobility loss and falls risk, in-hospital mortality, delirium, discharge to a facility, length of stay, and 30 day readmissions were assessed.

RESULTS

Those who lost mobility were more at risk of being a high fall risk, in-hospital mortality, delirium, discharging to a facility, and had 48% longer lengths of stay. There was no association between mobility loss and 30-day readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of mobility assessed using JH-HLM scores is associated with worse patient outcomes.

Exercise effects on intrinsic capacity in acutely hospitalised older adults: a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hospitalisation often results in adverse effects in older adults, particularly an increased risk of functional and cognitive decline. Although in-hospital exercise interventions have shown benefits, their impact on intrinsic capacity (IC) remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of multicomponent exercise training on IC in acutely hospitalised older adults.

DESIGN

Pooled analysis of two randomised clinical trials.

SETTING

Three Acute Care for Elders units.

SUBJECTS

Hospitalised older adults (≥75 years).

METHODS

The control group received standard care, whereas the exercise group participated in an in-hospital multicomponent exercise program. The primary outcome was IC assessed using a composite score (0-100) across five domains: vitality (handgrip strength), cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination), psychological health (Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale), locomotion (Short Physical Performance Battery) and sensory function (self-reported vision and hearing). Adverse outcomes were evaluated 1 year after discharge, including emergency visits, hospital re-admission and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 570 patients (age 87.3 ± 4.8 years) were enrolled during acute hospitalisation [median duration 8 (interquartile range = 3) days] and randomised to the exercise (n = 288) or control group (n = 282). The exercise intervention significantly improved IC compared to the control group [7.74 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.45-9.03, P < .001], with benefits observed in all IC domains. IC score at discharge was inversely associated with mortality risk during follow-up (OR = 0.98 per each increase in IC score at discharge, 95% CI = 0.96, 0.99, P = .010), although no association was found with emergency visits (P = .866) or re-admissions (P = .567).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital exercise is an effective strategy to enhance IC in hospitalised older adults. Additionally, the IC score at discharge was inversely related to the mortality risk within 1 year of discharge.

Impact of functional capacity before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on the length of hospital stay

OBJECTIVE

To verify the association between pre-HSCT functional capacity and the variables of pulmonary function, fatigue, and length of hospital stay.

METHODS

This is a cohort study, involving patients admitted to the bone marrow transplantation. The individuals were submitted to an evaluation in the first 24 h of hospitalization. The length of stay variable was checked on the day of hospital discharge. Functional capacity was assessed through the six-minute walk test (6MWT), and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (SST30) was performed to assess the indirect strength of the lower limbs; moreover, the revised Piper Fatigue Scale was used for the evaluation of the pulmonary function.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 35 individuals (19 male; 54%). Fourteen patients achieved a 6MWT ≥80% predicted. The mean age of the sample was 45.5 ± 15.2 years, and BMI 27.4 ± 5.4 kg/m2. Patients who completed a six-minute walking distance (6MWD) below the predicted value showed significantly lower pulmonary function values for the variables peak expiratory flow (PEF) (%) (p = 0.031), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (%) (p = 0.033), and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (%) (p = 0.027) in relation to the group with better functional capacity. This group showed significantly higher values in the assessment of lower limb fatigue using the Borg scale pre- (p = 0.008) and post- (p = 0.004) 6MWT, longer hospitalization time (p = 0.0014), but with no significant difference in lower limb muscle strength between groups (p = 0.21). A moderate correlation was found between the 6MWD% and FEV1% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Data indicate that starting HSCT treatment with lower-than-expected physical fitness is associated with lower lung function, greater fatigue in the lower limbs, and longer hospital stays.

Comparison of hospitalisation settings and exercise interventions in acute care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inpatient hospitalisation is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults, including hospital-associated deconditioning. The hospital-at-home (HaH) model may promote physical activity. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares functional outcomes between inpatient and HaH settings and evaluates the efficacy of exercise interventions in both settings.

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect were conducted on 27 April 2024. Three distinct searches were performed: (i) studies comparing HaH and inpatient hospitalisation, (ii) trials evaluating inpatient exercise interventions and (iii) research on HaH exercise interventions. Two reviewers independently selected studies published from 2014 onwards using the PICOS framework and they assessed quality using PEDro scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to analyse exercise interventions. This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024598286).

RESULTS

Among the 9470 studies identified, nine studies comparing acute-care settings and 21 studies on exercise interventions (one in HaH) were included. Findings suggest that HaH may positively affect functional and cognitive outcomes. Inpatient exercise interventions significantly improved physical performance [standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.12-0.72] and functional independence (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.14-0.77) at discharge.

CONCLUSION

HaH may contribute to preserving physical and cognitive status. Supervised exercise interventions during inpatient hospitalisation are safe and effective for improving older adults' functional status, although further research in the HaH model is needed.

Impact of wheelchair reclining and leg rest angles on pressure distribution in back, buttocks, and feet: an experimental study in healthy adults

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine the effects of reclining angle and leg rest angle adjustments on pressure distribution in the back, buttocks, and feet in a wheelchair sitting position. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-six healthy young adults participated in this study. Pressures on the back, buttocks, and feet were measured under nine postural conditions with a combination of reclining angles (10°, 30°, and 50°) and leg rest angles (20°, 40°, and 60°). Body pressure distribution was measured for 30 s in each posture using a pressure distribution measuring device, followed by statistical analysis. [Results] Posture adjustments significantly impacted pressure distribution. Pressure was increased on the back and reduced on the buttocks of participants when in the reclining position. The leg rest angle had a minimal effect on foot pressure, but changes in the leg rest angle influenced the balance of pressure between the back and buttocks. [Conclusion] Adjusting wheelchair posture can effectively manage pressure distribution and reduce the risk of pain and pressure ulcers, especially on the back and buttocks. The reclining angle plays a key role in redistributing pressure, making it important for comfort and the prevention of bedsores.

Predicting Persistent Reduced Physical Performance in Adults 65+ in Emergency Departments: A Temporal Validation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Targeted interventions to maintain physical performance in older adults are important. We aimed to validate an existing 4-item prediction model and, if necessary, develop a new model for early identification of adults aged 65+ with persistent reduced physical performance.

METHODS

A temporal validation study on adults aged 65+ admitted to the emergency department for medical reasons and who performed ≤8 repetitions in the 30-second chair-stand test (30s-CST) within the first 48 hours of admission. The primary outcome was the number of 30s-CST repetitions (≤8 or >8) performed at the older adults' homes 3 to 4 weeks after admission.

Physical performance and self-reported data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. The optimal model was chosen based on the area under the curve.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The validation of a previously developed 4-item prediction model indicated that the model did not consistently apply to other populations of older adults. To develop a new model aimed at identifying acutely hospitalized older adults with persistent reduced physical performance, we combined 2 samples comprising 132 older adults with a 30s-CST score > 8 and 250 adults with a 30s-CST score ≤ 8 when measured 3 to 4 weeks after admission. The new model included 5 variables: age >80, female, self-reported difficulties in climbing a flight of stairs, less good/poor self-rated health, and a 30s-CST score ≤ 5. The model had an area under the curve of 84%. The model is expected to improve the identification of older adults with persistent reduced physical performance compared to health professionals' subjective assessments and/or adults' self-reported information.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial 4-item prediction did not consistently apply to other populations of older adults. Consequently, 2 samples were combined and a 5-item model was developed. Since the model involves only 5 items, it is easy to implement and provides health professionals an opportunity for targeted intervention on older adults during and after acute hospitalization. A validation study for the 5-item model is necessary.

Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR)

Aging, a universal and inevitable process, is characterized by a progressive accumulation of physiological alterations and functional decline over time, leading to increased vulnerability to diseases and ultimately mortality as age advances. Lifestyle factors, notably physical activity (PA) and exercise, significantly modulate aging phenotypes. Physical activity and exercise can prevent or ameliorate lifestyle-related diseases, extend health span, enhance physical function, and reduce the burden of non-communicable chronic diseases including cardiometabolic disease, cancer, musculoskeletal and neurological conditions, and chronic respiratory diseases as well as premature mortality. Physical activity influences the cellular and molecular drivers of biological aging, slowing aging rates-a foundational aspect of geroscience. Thus, PA serves both as preventive medicine and therapeutic agent in pathological states. Sub-optimal PA levels correlate with increased disease prevalence in aging populations. Structured exercise prescriptions should therefore be customized and monitored like any other medical treatment, considering the dose-response relationships and specific adaptations necessary for intended outcomes. Current guidelines recommend a multifaceted exercise regimen that includes aerobic, resistance, balance, and flexibility training through structured and incidental (integrated lifestyle) activities. Tailored exercise programs have proven effective in helping older adults maintain their functional capacities, extending their health span, and enhancing their quality of life. Particularly important are anabolic exercises, such as Progressive resistance training (PRT), which are indispensable for maintaining or improving functional capacity in older adults, particularly those with frailty, sarcopenia or osteoporosis, or those hospitalized or in residential aged care. Multicomponent exercise interventions that include cognitive tasks significantly enhance the hallmarks of frailty (low body mass, strength, mobility, PA level, and energy) and cognitive function, thus preventing falls and optimizing functional capacity during aging. Importantly, PA/exercise displays dose-response characteristics and varies between individuals, necessitating personalized modalities tailored to specific medical conditions. Precision in exercise prescriptions remains a significant area of further research, given the global impact of aging and broad effects of PA. Economic analyses underscore the cost benefits of exercise programs, justifying broader integration into health care for older adults. However, despite these benefits, exercise is far from fully integrated into medical practice for older people. Many healthcare professionals, including geriatricians, need more training to incorporate exercise directly into patient care, whether in settings including hospitals, outpatient clinics, or residential care. Education about the use of exercise as isolated or adjunctive treatment for geriatric syndromes and chronic diseases would do much to ease the problems of polypharmacy and widespread prescription of potentially inappropriate medications. This intersection of prescriptive practices and PA/exercise offers a promising approach to enhance the well-being of older adults. An integrated strategy that combines exercise prescriptions with pharmacotherapy would optimize the vitality and functional independence of older people whilst minimizing adverse drug reactions. This consensus provides the rationale for the integration of PA into health promotion, disease prevention, and management strategies for older adults. Guidelines are included for specific modalities and dosages of exercise with proven efficacy in randomized controlled trials. Descriptions of the beneficial physiological changes, attenuation of aging phenotypes, and role of exercise in chronic disease and disability management in older adults are provided. The use of exercise in cardiometabolic disease, cancer, musculoskeletal conditions, frailty, sarcopenia, and neuropsychological health is emphasized. Recommendations to bridge existing knowledge and implementation gaps and fully integrate PA into the mainstream of geriatric care are provided. Particular attention is paid to the need for personalized medicine as it applies to exercise and geroscience, given the inter-individual variability in adaptation to exercise demonstrated in older adult cohorts. Overall, this consensus provides a foundation for applying and extending the current knowledge base of exercise as medicine for an aging population to optimize health span and quality of life.

Development of evidence-based standards for inpatient physiotherapy services: a systematic review and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVE

Performance standards are critical to service design and quality improvement. There are no published standards defining the care inpatients should receive from physiotherapists in Aotearoa New Zealand. This study aims to explore the potential of using clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to develop a set of evidence-based standards for physiotherapy in inpatient settings.

DESIGN

A systematic review and content analysis of CPGs.

DATA SOURCES

Scholarly databases (Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus, PEDro) and grey literature (guideline databases - NICE, SIGN, ECRI guideline trust, Guidelines International Network (GIN)) were searched between July and September 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

CPGs related to conditions and treatments common to physiotherapy in a secondary care setting were included. Mental health conditions, paediatrics, COVID-19 and conditions common to tertiary care were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A pragmatic approach was taken to group guidelines aligned with common physiotherapy services and select only the most recent and comprehensive guidelines for final analysis. The quality of CPGs was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II). Data from guideline recommendations of relevance to inpatient physiotherapy were grouped into themes. Summative 'statements' were drafted to represent the content of each theme; these were given a confidence rating based on the number of supporting guidelines and the strength or grade of evidence awarded by the guideline group.

RESULTS

The recommendations of 32 CPGs yielded 27 statements.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-seven statements represent a distillation of the best evidence-based practice recommendations from CPGs in inpatient physiotherapy. Statements of physiotherapy dosage (frequency, intensity and duration) are not available for many areas of practice; researchers and CPG groups should consider the importance of these data for service commissioning.  .

Short-Term Multicomponent Exercise Impact on Muscle Function and Structure in Hospitalized Older at Risk of Acute Sarcopenia

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization exacerbates sarcopenia and physical dysfunction in older adults. Whether tailored inpatient exercise prevents acute sarcopenia is unknown. This study aimed to examine the effect of a multicomponent exercise programme on muscle and physical function in hospitalized older adults. We hypothesized that participation in a brief tailored exercise regimen (i.e., 3-5 days) would attenuate muscle function and structure changes compared with usual hospital care alone.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment was conducted from May 2018 to April 2021 at Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Spain. Participants were 130 patients aged 75 years and older admitted to an acute care geriatric unit. Patients were randomized to a tailored 3- to 5-day exercise programme (n = 64) or usual hospital care (control, n = 66) consisting of physical therapy if needed. The coprimary endpoints were between-group differences in changes in short physical performance battery (SPPB) score and usual gait velocity from hospital admission to discharge. Secondary endpoints included changes in rectus femoris echo intensity, cross-sectional area, thickness and subcutaneous and intramuscular fat by ultrasound.

RESULTS

Among 130 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 87.7 [4.6] years; 57 [44%] women), the exercise group increased their mean SPPB score by 0.98 points (95% CI, 0.28-1.69 points) and gait velocity by 0.09 m/s (95% CI, 0.03-0.15 m/s) more than controls (both p < 0.01). No between-group differences were observed in any ultrasound muscle outcomes. There were no study-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Three to 5 days of tailored multicomponent exercise provided functional benefits but did not alter muscle or fat architecture compared with usual hospital care alone among vulnerable older patients. Brief exercise may help prevent acute sarcopenia during hospitalization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04600453.

The effectiveness of Function Focused Care among patients acutely admitted to hospital: A stepped wedge cluster trial

BACKGROUND

During acute hospital admission, patients often experience loss of functional status. A low level of physical activity is associated with higher levels of loss of functional status. Stimulating physical activity to maintain functional status is considered essential nursing care. Function Focused Care is a promising approach stimulating physical activity. In a previous study, Function Focused Care in Hospital was deemed feasible.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of Function Focused Care in Hospital compared with usual care on the functional status of hospitalized stroke and geriatric patients.

DESIGN

A multicenter stepped wedge cluster trial.

METHODS

A neurological and a geriatric ward of an academic hospital and a general hospital in the Netherlands participated in this study; each was considered a cluster in the trial. The primary outcome was patients' functional status over time, measured with the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale. Secondary outcomes were the patients' length of stay, fear of falling, self-efficacy, motivation, resilience, and outcome expectations for functional and exercise activities. Data was collected at hospital admission (baseline), day of discharge, and three and six months after discharge via patient files and questionnaires and analyzed with generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

In total, we included 892 patients, of which 427 received Function Focused Care in Hospital and 465 received usual care. Although we did not find significant differences in the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale at discharge or follow-up, we found a significant decrease in the mean length of stay (-3.3 days, 95 % CI -5.3 to -1.1) in favor of the Function Focused Care in Hospital group. In addition, in the Function Focused Care in Hospital group, a larger proportion of patients were discharged to home compared to the control group (38.2 % vs. 29.0 %, p = 0.017), who were discharged more often to a care facility.

CONCLUSION

The length of hospital stay was substantially decreased, and discharge to home was more common in the group receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital with equal levels of independence in Activities of Daily Living and mobility in both groups upon discharge. Although significant differences in the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale were not found, we observed that neurological and geriatric patients were discharged significantly earlier compared to the control group.

REGISTRATION

https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/24287 (date of first recruitment: 05-02-2016).

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Patients receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital were discharged from the hospital 3.3 days earlier and discharged home more often than the group of patients receiving care as usual. @umcutrecht @hogeschoolutrecht.

The business case for hospital mobility programs in the veterans health care system: Results from multi-hospital implementation of the STRIDE program

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a business case analysis for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) program STRIDE (ASsisTed EaRly MobIlization for hospitalizeD older VEterans), which was designed to address immobility for hospitalized older adults.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

This was a secondary analysis of primary data from a VA 8-hospital implementation trial conducted by the Function and Independence Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). In partnership with VA operational partners, we estimated resources needed for program delivery in and out of the VA as well as national implementation facilitation in the VA. A scenario analysis using wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics informs implementation decisions outside the VA.

STUDY DESIGN

This budget impact analysis compared delivery and implementation costs for two implementation strategies (Replicating Effective Programs [REP]+CONNECT and REP-only). To simulate national budget scenarios for implementation, we estimated the number of eligible hospitalizations nationally and varied key parameters (e.g., enrollment rates) to evaluate the impact of uncertainty.

DATA COLLECTION

Personnel time and implementation outcomes were collected from hospitals (2017-2019). Hospital average daily census and wage data were estimated as of 2022 to improve relevance to future implementation.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Average implementation costs were $9450 for REP+CONNECT and $5622 for REP-only; average program delivery costs were less than $30 per participant in both VA and non-VA hospital settings. Number of walks had the most impact on delivery costs and ranged from 1 to 5 walks per participant. In sensitivity analyses, cost increased to $35 per participant if a physical therapist assistant conducts the walks. Among study hospitals, mean enrollment rates were higher among the REP+CONNECT hospitals (12%) than the REP-only hospitals (4%) and VA implementation costs ranged from $66 to $100 per enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

STRIDE is a low-cost intervention, and program participation has the biggest impact on the resources needed for delivering STRIDE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalsTrials.gov NCT03300336. Prospectively registered on 3 October 2017.

Effect of goal-directed mobilisation versus standard care on physical functioning among medical inpatients: the GoMob-in randomised, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM) on physical functioning in medical inpatients.

DESIGN

Randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel, superiority trial with a 3-month follow-up and blinded outcome assessment.

SETTING

General internal medicine wards of a Swiss tertiary acute hospital, September 2021 to April 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with expected hospitalisation of ≥5 days, physiotherapy prescription and ability to follow study procedures.

INTERVENTION

GDM during hospitalisation, which includes personal goal setting and a short session of patient education through a physiotherapist (experimental group), versus standard care (control group).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in physical activity between baseline and day 5 (De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI)). Secondary outcomes included in-hospital accelerometer-measured mobilisation time; in-hospital falls; delirium; length of stay; change in independence in activities of daily living, concerns of falling and quality of life; falls, readmission and mortality within 3 months.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 123 of 162 (76%) patients enrolled, with the primary outcome collected at day 5 in 126 (78%) participants. DEMMI Score improved by 8.2 (SD 15.1) points in the control group and 9.4 (SD 14.2) in the intervention group, with a mean difference of 0.3 (adjusted for the stratification factors age and initial DEMMI Score, 95% CI -4.1 to 4.8, p=0.88). We did not observe a statistically significant difference in effects of the interventions on any secondary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient's physical functioning improved during hospitalisation, but the improvement was similar for GDM and standard of care. Improving physical activity during an acute medical hospitalisation remains challenging. Future interventions should target additional barriers that can be implemented without augmenting resources.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04760392.

New horizons in hospital-associated deconditioning: a global condition of body and mind

Hospital-associated deconditioning is a broad term, which refers non-specifically to declines in any function of the body secondary to hospitalisation. Older people, particularly those living with frailty, are known to be at greatest risk. It has historically been most commonly used as a term to describe declines in muscle mass and function (i.e. acute sarcopenia). However, declines in physical function do not occur in isolation, and it is recognised that cognitive deconditioning (defined by delayed mental processing as part of a spectrum with fulminant delirium at one end) is commonly encountered by patients in hospital. Whilst the term 'deconditioning' is descriptive, it perhaps leads to under-emphasis on the inherent organ dysfunction that is associated, and also implies some ease of reversibility. Whilst deconditioning may be reversible with early intervention strategies, the long-term effects can be devastating. In this article, we summarise the most recent research on this topic including new promising interventions and describe our recommendations for implementation of tools such as the Frailty Care Bundle.

Risk factors for hospitalization-associated disability among older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of older patients are significantly limited by hospitalization-associated disability (HAD), and there are currently few available management options for HAD. This review aimed to identify and quantify the risk factors for HAD, to provide reliable evidence for developing a HAD prevention program centered on risk factor management among older patients.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases were searched in March 2024 to identify cross-sectional and cohort studies that used multivariable analysis to examine risk factors for HAD among older patients.

RESULTS

We screened 883 studies, 21 of which met our inclusion criteria. Our findings revealed a substantial association between various risk factors and HAD among older patients. Specifically, advanced age, female sex, Caucasian ethnicity, comorbidity burden, better activities of daily living at admission, dementia diagnosis, and longer lengths of stay were significant risk factors for HAD. Furthermore, frailty, poor physical function, immobility, and delirium were identified as confirmed risk factors for HAD among older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provided a comprehensive synthesis of available evidence on risk factors for HAD among older patients, serving as a valuable guide for the development of HAD prevention strategies both prior to and during hospitalization.

Theory-driven assessment of intentions and behaviours related to mobility of older inpatients: a survey of patients and healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND

Low mobility of patients during hospitalisation is associated with adverse outcomes. To successfully change behaviours related to mobility of older hospitalised patients, we need to better understand the mechanisms underlying patient and healthcare professional behaviours. In this study, we thus assessed patient- and healthcare professional-reported intentions and behaviours related to mobility of older patients hospitalised on an acute medical ward, based on a theoretical framework - the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model - and on additional barriers and facilitators to mobility.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey in April 2022 among patients aged ≥60 years recently hospitalised on an an acute medical ward of one of three hospitals of different language/cultural regions of Switzerland, and healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses/nursing assistants, physiotherapists) working on those wards. The survey assessed the HAPA model and additional barriers and facilitators to patient mobility at hospital, as previously identified in the literature. The target behaviour studied was "to move as much as possible during hospitalisation" for patients and "to ensure my patients move as much as possible during hospitalisation" for healthcare professionals. We conducted hierarchical linear regressions to determine factors associated with the self-reported intention to perform the behaviour and with the self-reported behaviour itself.

RESULTS

A total of 142 healthcare professionals (61 physicians, 59 nurses, 22 physiotherapists) and 200 patients (mean age 74 years) completed the survey. Patients with higher intention to move as much as possible during hospitalisation scored significantly higher on factual knowledge, outcome expectancies and risk perception. Healthcare professionals with higher intention to ensure that their patients move as much as possible during hospitalisation scored higher on action knowledge, outcome expectancies and risk perception. The more the patients reported that they moved as much as possible during hospitalisation, the higher their action knowledge and action control. The more healthcare professionals reported that they ensure that patients move as much as possible during hospitalisation, the higher they scored on factual knowledge, role perception, planning and action control.

CONCLUSIONS

factual and action knowledge, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, risk perception, planning and action control were identified as important drivers of patient- and healthcare professional-reported intentions and behaviours related to inpatient mobility. These parameters can be addressed through behaviour-change interventions and should be considered in future interventions to successfully implement practice changes, with the goal of improving mobility of older patients during hospitalisation, and thus the outcomes of this particularly vulnerable population.

Safety and Patient Experience With Early Mobilization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Immobilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for preventing access-related complications. However, the length of bed rest varies, and possible complications and patient experience remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, our aim was to investigate safety and efficacy after bed rest after TAVR.

METHODS

This single-center randomized trial included 298 patients. Patients were randomized to standard 6 hours (n = 149) or 3 hours (n = 149) of bed rest after TAVR. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of access-related bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥ 2), hematoma (>5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, and vascular complications requiring intervention. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient-reported back pain, rated ≥6 on a numeric rating scale 24 hours post procedure. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary safety endpoint, patient-reported pain, urination problems, and comfort.

RESULTS

The primary safety endpoint occurred in 14 (9.4%) and 12 (8.1%) patients in the 6-hour and 3-hour immobilization groups, respectively (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.79]; P = .68). There were no significant differences in individual bleeding or vascular complication endpoints. Patients with 3 hours of bed rest reported less back pain (P < .001), fewer urination problems (P < .001), and better comfort (P < .001) than patients with 6 hours of bed rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Mobilization as early as 3 hours after TAVR was shown to be safe, not resulting in a higher rate of bleeding or vascular complications as compared with 6 hours of bed rest. However, there was a difference in patient-reported back pain, urination problems, and comfort, favoring early mobilization.

Nursing care for hospitalized older adults - fall accidents versus safe mobility: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

to map the constituent elements of the safe mobility concept present in hospital care for older adults.

METHODS

a scoping review of 35 articles searched in databases and gray literature - BDENF/VHL, Scopus, CINAHL/EBSCO, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, MEDLINE/PubMed and CAPES Theses and Dissertations Catalog. No time or language cut-off was established.

RESULTS

none of the studies presented a clear safe mobility concept, however its constituent elements involve factors related to patient (behavioral factors, conditions, diseases, signs and symptoms, nutritional status, age, balance, strength, gait quality, sleep), the institution (environment, treatment devices, guidelines, medications and polypharmacy, material and human resources and clothing/shoes) and the nature of the interventions (related to the patient, institution and family).

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

the constituent elements of safe mobility express hospital units' capacity to guarantee care and protection from fall accidents for hospitalized older adults.

Enhancing team communication to improve implementation of a supervised walking program for hospitalized veterans: Evidence from a multi-site trial in the Veterans Health Administration

INTRODUCTION

The timely translation of evidence-based programs into real-world clinical settings is a persistent challenge due to complexities related to organizational context and team function, particularly in inpatient settings. Strategies are needed to promote quality improvement efforts and implementation of new clinical programs.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the role of CONNECT, a complexity science-based implementation intervention to promote team readiness, for enhancing implementation of the 'Assisted Early Mobility for Hospitalized Older Veterans' program (STRIDE), an inpatient, supervised walking program.

DESIGN

We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial using a convergent mixed-methods design. Within each randomly assigned stepped-wedge sequence, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) were randomized to receive standardized implementation support only or additional training via the CONNECT intervention. Data for the study were obtained from hospital administrative and electronic health records, surveys, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians before and after implementation of STRIDE.

SETTING

Eight U.S. VAMCs.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred fifty-three survey participants before STRIDE implementation and 294 surveys after STRIDE implementation. Ninety-two interview participants.

INTERVENTION

CONNECT, a complexity-science-based intervention to improve team function.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The implementation outcomes included STRIDE reach and fidelity. Secondary outcomes included validated measures of team function (i.e., team communication, coordination, role clarity).

RESULTS

At four VAMCs randomized to CONNECT, reach was higher (mean 12.4% vs. 3.8%), and fidelity was similar to four non-CONNECT VAMCs. VAMC STRIDE delivery teams receiving CONNECT reported improvements in team function domains, similar to non-CONNECT VAMCs. Qualitative findings highlight CONNECT's impact and the influence of team characteristics and contextual factors, including team cohesion, leadership support, and role clarity, on reach and fidelity.

CONCLUSION

CONNECT may promote greater reach of STRIDE, but improvement in team function among CONNECT VAMCs was similar to improvement among non-CONNECT VAMCs. Qualitative findings suggest that CONNECT may improve team function and implementation outcomes but may not be sufficient to overcome structural barriers related to implementation capacity.

Implementation of MOVIN by a Nurse-Led Clinical Team: A Multiple Methods Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework

PURPOSE

To evaluate the implementation of MOVIN, a multicomponent mobility intervention, by a nurse-led team and measure the effectiveness on unit-level outcomes.

METHOD

A pragmatic quasi-experimental study was conducted on an inpatient adult medical unit. Evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Interviews with 13 organizational partners were conducted to understand barriers and facilitators to adoption. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Quantitative data to determine effectiveness on distance of patient ambulation and percent of patients ambulated by nursing staff were analyzed using an interrupted time series.

RESULTS

A significant increase in total weekly distances for patient ambulation and percent of patients ambulated by nursing staff occurred between preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods. Themes for adoption included: Value, Immediate Feedback, Inclusive Implementation, Resource Needs, and Lack of Organizational Evidence. The nurse-led team demonstrated high fidelity to maintaining the core components of MOVIN.

CONCLUSION

A nurse-led team can successfully launch a multicomponent mobility intervention and sustain impact. RE-AIM supported assessments of key partners at multiple organizational levels, capturing critical unit level outcomes. Multiple methods for data collection and analysis yielded rich results to inform future dissemination of MOVIN. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 17(4), 189-201.].

Prognostic value of defining characteristics in frail elderly syndrome: Hospital readmission and mortality outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most relevant clinical characteristics of the nursing diagnosis frail elderly syndrome (FES) in hospitalized patients aged 65 or older and analyze their impact on 9-month mortality and hospital readmission.

METHODS

A prospective and prognostic accuracy study was conducted in patients aged 65 or older, who were admitted to hospital more than 24 h. A consecutive convenience sampling process was used. Assessment included defining characteristics (DCs) of FES, clinical fraility scale (CFS), frail scale (FS), and 9-month mortality and hospital readmission. Statistical tests were used to verify associations between variables. Binary logistic regression analysis and area under the curve were used, to identify significant predictors for the outcomes and evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the DCs.

FINDINGS

This study involved 150 patients. CFS scored 65 patients (43.3%, confidence interval 95% 35.2% a 51.6) as frail and proved a prognostic value of mortality at 9 month from pre-frail state (p = 0.020). The mean number of DCs for FES nursing diagnosis was 6.35 (SD = 3.14). Validated tools for measuring frailty were associated with all DCs, excepting nutritional imbalance: below body needs. The hospital readmission during the following 9 months was only statistically related to memory impairment (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Clinical frailty scale showed good results as a predictor of mortality. The study suggests exploring including it, in clinical manifestations of elderly frail syndrome. This study found that only memory impairment defining characteristic was predictive of hospital readmission. Further research should identify other relevant and prognostic clinical manifestations.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

These findings highlight the importance of being vigilant on cognitive decline during hospital admissions. The most prevalent and determinant DCs identified in this study indicate that clinical should focus on preserving functional and mental abilities as well as mobility.

Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among people living with disabilities: A systematic review

Background

Around 15% of the global population live with some form of disabilities and experience worse health outcomes, less participation in the community and are part of fewer activities outside the home. Outdoor mobility interventions aim to improve the ability to move, travel and orient outside the home and could influence the number of activities outside the home, participation and quality of life. However, outdoor mobility interventions may also lead to harm like falls or injuries or have unforeseen effects which could lead to mortality or hospitalization.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of interventions aiming to improve outdoor mobility for adults living with disabilities and to explore if the efficacy varies between different conditions and different intervention components.

Search Methods

Standard, extensive Campbell search methods were used, including a total of 12 databases searched during January 2023, including trial registries.

Selection Criteria

Only randomized controlled trials were included, focusing on people living with disabilities, comparing interventions to improve outdoor mobility to control interventions as well as comparing different types of interventions to improve outdoor mobility.

Data Collection and Analysis

Standard methodological procedures expected by Campbell were used. The following important outcomes were 1. Activity outside the home; 2. Engagement in everyday life activities; 3. Participation; 4. Health-related Quality of Life; 5. Major harms; 6. Minor harms. The impact of the interventions was evaluated in the shorter (≤6 months) and longer term (≥7 months) after starting the intervention. Results are presented using risk ratios (RR), risk difference (RD), and standardized mean differences (SMD), with the associated confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias 2-tool and the GRADE-framework were used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Main Results

The screening comprised of 12.894 studies and included 22 studies involving 2.675 people living with disabilities and identified 12 ongoing studies. All reported outcomes except one (reported in one study, some concerns of bias) had overall high risk of bias. Thirteen studies were conducted in participants with disabilities due to stroke, five studies with older adults living with disabilities, two studies with wheelchair users, one study in participants with disabilities after a hip fracture, and one study in participants with cognitive impairments. Skill training interventions versus control interventions (16 studies) The evidence is very uncertain about the benefits and harms of skill training interventions versus control interventions not aimed to improve outdoor mobility among all people living with disabilities both in the shorter term (≤6 months) and longer term (≥7 months) for Activity outside the home; Participation; Health-related Quality of Life; Major harms; and Minor harms, based on very low certainty evidence. Skill training interventions may improve engagement in everyday life activities among people with disabilities in the shorter term (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.84; I 2 = 7%; RD: 0.15; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.32; I 2 = 71%; 692 participants; three studies; low certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain in the longer term, based on very low certainty evidence. Subgroup analysis of skill training interventions among people living with disabilities due to cognitive impairments suggests that such interventions may improve activity outside the home in the shorter term (SMD: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.81; I 2 = NA; 118 participants; one study; low certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis of skill training interventions among people living with cognitive impairments suggests that such interventions may improve health-related quality of life in the shorter term (SMD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.88; I 2 = NA; 118 participants; one study; low certainty evidence). Physical training interventions versus control interventions (five studies) The evidence is very uncertain about the benefits and harms of physical training interventions versus control interventions not aimed to improve outdoor mobility in the shorter term (≤6 months) and longer term (≥7 months) for: Engagement in everyday life activities; Participation; Health-related Quality of Life; Major harms; and Minor harms, based on very low certainty evidence. Physical training interventions may improve activity outside the home in the shorter (SMD: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.61; I 2 = NA; 228 participants; one study; low certainty evidence) and longer term (≥7 months) (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.54; I 2 = NA; 216 participants; one study; low certainty evidence). Comparison of different outdoor mobility interventions (one study) The evidence is very uncertain about the benefits and harms of outdoor mobility interventions of different lengths in the shorter term (≤6 months) and longer term (≥7 months) for Activity outside the home; Engagement in everyday life activities; Participation; Health-related Quality of Life; Major harms; and Minor harms, based on very low certainty evidence. No studies explored the efficacy of other types of interventions.

Authors’ Conclusions

Twenty-two studies of interventions to improve outdoor mobility for people living with disabilities were identified, but the evidence still remains uncertain about most benefits and harms of these interventions, both in the short- and long term. This is primarily related to risk of bias, small underpowered studies and limited reporting of important outcomes for people living with disabilities. For people with disabilities, skill training interventions may improve engagement in everyday life in the short term, and improve activity outside the home and health-related quality of life for people with cognitive impairments in the short term. Still, this is based on low certainty evidence from few studies and should be interpreted with caution. One study with low certainty evidence suggests that physical training interventions may improve activity outside the home in the short term. In addition, the effect sizes across all outcomes were considered small or trivial, and could be of limited relevance to people living with disabilities. The evidence is currently uncertain if there are interventions that can improve outdoor mobility for people with disabilities, and can improve other important outcomes, while avoiding harms. To guide decisions about the use of interventions to improve outdoor mobility, future studies should use more rigorous design and report important outcomes for people with disabilities to reduce the current uncertainty.

Dose-Response Relationship Between Exercise Duration and Enhanced Function and Cognition in Acutely Hospitalized Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and Objectives

Exercise may reverse functional decline in hospitalized older adults, but the optimal duration is unclear. This study examined the potential relationship between in-hospital multicomponent exercise program duration and changes in physical function, cognition, and muscle function to maximize exercise-related health benefits in acutely hospitalized older patients.

Research Design and Methods

This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial examined the relationship between the duration of an in-hospital multicomponent exercise program and changes in physical function, cognition, and muscle strength in 570 acutely hospitalized older adults. Participants completed 3, 4, or 5-7 consecutive days of exercise based on the progression of their acute medical illness. The acute clinical condition of the older patients was similar across the study groups (i.e., 3/4/5-7 days) at admission. Outcomes included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) for functional capacity, Gait Velocity Test for gait speed, handgrip for muscle strength, and cognitive tests.

Results

Of the 570 patients included in the analysis, 298 were women (52.3%), and the mean (SD) age was 87.3 (4.8) years. Exercise groups increased SPPB scores compared with controls, with gains of 1.09 points after three days, 1.97 points after four days, and 2.02 points after 5-7 days (p < .001). The 4-day program showed the most significant benefit for functional capacity. Gait velocity increased by 0.11 m/s after 4 and 5-7 days (p = .032). Similar dose-response relationships were seen for handgrip strength and cognition, with 5-7 days showing more significant gains than three days (p < .05).

Discussion and Implications

Multicomponent exercise programs enhance physical and cognitive function in hospitalized older adults, regardless of exercise dosage. A 4-day program significantly boosts functional capacity, although 5-7 days improves handgrip strength and cognition, highlighting the importance of exercise dosage in countering functional decline. Implementing evidence-based inpatient exercise prescriptions can help reverse muscle weakness and improve cognitive and physical function.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04600453.

Evaluation of strategies to support implementation of a hospital walking program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial

BACKGROUND

STRIDE is a supervised walking program designed to address the negative consequences of immobility during hospitalization for older adults. In an 8-hospital stepped wedge randomized controlled trial, STRIDE was associated with reduced odds of hospital discharge to skilled nursing facility. STRIDE has the potential to become a system-wide approach to address hospital-associated disability in Veteran's Affairs; however, critical questions remain about how best to scale and sustain the program. The overall study goal is to compare the impact of two strategies on STRIDE program penetration (primary), fidelity, and adoption implementation outcomes.

METHODS

Replicating Effective Programs will be used as a framework underlying all implementation support activities. In a parallel, cluster randomized trial, we will use stratified blocked randomization to assign hospitals (n = 32) to either foundational support, comprised of standard, low-touch activities, or enhanced support, which includes the addition of tailored, high-touch activities if hospitals do not meet STRIDE program benchmarks at 6 and 8 months following start date. All hospitals begin with foundational support for 6 months until randomization occurs. The primary outcome is implementation penetration defined as the proportion of eligible hospitalizations with ≥ 1 STRIDE walks at 10 months. Secondary outcomes are fidelity and adoption with all implementation outcomes additionally examined at 13 and 16 months. Fidelity will be assessed for STRIDE hospitalizations as the percentage of eligible hospital days with "full dose" of the program, defined as two or more documented walks or one walk for more than 5 min. Program adoption is a binary outcome defined as ≥ 5 patients with a STRIDE walk or not. Analyses will also include patient-level effectiveness outcomes (e.g., discharge to nursing home, length of stay) and staffing and labor costs. We will employ a convergent mixed-methods approach to explore and understand pre-implementation contextual factors related to differences in hospital-level adoption.

DISCUSSION

Our study results will dually inform best practices for promoting successful implementation of an evidence-based hospital-based walking program. This information may support other programs by advancing our understanding of how to apply and scale-up national implementation strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on June 1, 2021, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04868656 ).

Mobility level and factors affecting mobility status in hospitalized patients admitted in single-occupancy patient rooms

BACKGROUND

Although stimulating patients' mobility is considered a component of fundamental nursing care, approximately 35% of hospitalized patients experience functional decline during or after hospital admission. The aim of this study is to assess mobility level and to identify factors affecting mobility status in hospitalized patients admitted in single-occupancy patient rooms (SPRs) on general wards.

METHODS

Mobility level was quantified with the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale (JH-HLM) and EQ-5D-3L. GENEActiv accelerometer data over 24 h were collected in a subset of patients. Data were analyzed using generalized ordinal logistic regression analysis. The STROBE reporting checklist was applied.

RESULTS

Wearing pajamas during daytime, having pain, admission in an isolation room, and wearing three or more medical equipment were negatively associated with mobilization level. More than half of patients (58.9%) who were able to mobilize according to the EQ-5D-3L did not achieve the highest possible level of mobility according to the JH-HLM. The subset of patients that wore an accelerometer spent most of the day in sedentary behavior (median 88.1%, IQR 85.9-93.6). The median total daily step count was 1326 (range 22-5362).

CONCLUSION

We found that the majority of participating hospitalized patients staying in single-occupancy patient rooms were able to mobilize. It appeared, however, that most of the patients who are physically capable of walking, do not reach the highest possible level of mobility according to the JH-HLM scale. Nurses should take their responsibility to ensure that patients achieve the highest possible level of mobility.

Impact of an INtervention to increase MOBility in older hospitalized medical patients (INTOMOB): Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Low mobility during an acute hospitalization is frequent and associated with adverse effects, including persistent functional decline, institutionalization and death. However, we lack effective interventions to improve mobility that are scalable in everyday practice. The INTOMOB trial - INtervention to increase MOBility in older hospitalized medical patients - will test the effect of a multilevel intervention to improve mobility of older hospitalized patients on functional mobility.

METHODS

The INTOMOB multicenter superiority parallel cluster randomized controlled trial will enroll in total 274 patients in Swiss hospitals. Community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years, admitted to a general internal medicine ward with an anticipated length of hospital stay of ≥ 3 days, will be eligible for participation. Unit of randomization will be the wards. A multilevel mobility intervention will be compared to standard of care and target the patients (information and exercise booklets, mobility diary, iPad with exercise videos), healthcare professionals (e-learning, oral presentation, mobility checklist), and environment (posters and pictures on the wards). The primary outcome will be life-space level, measured by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment (LSA), at 30 days after enrollment. The LSA is a measure of functional mobility, i.e., how far participants move from bedroom to outside town. Secondary outcomes include, among others, LSA at 180 days, mobility and falls during hospitalization, muscle strength at discharge, and falls, emergency room visits, readmissions, and death within 180 days.

DISCUSSION

This study has the potential to improve outcomes of older hospitalized patients through an intervention that should be scalable in clinical practice because it fosters patient empowerment and does not require additional resources. The tools provided to the patients can help them implement better mobility practices after discharge, which can contribute to better functional outcomes. The choice of a functional patient-reported outcome measure as primary outcome (rather than a "simple" objective mobility measure) reinforces the patient-centeredness of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05639231, released on December 19 2022); Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal (SNCTP000005259, released on November 28 2022).

Assessment tools and incidence of hospital-associated disability in older adults: a rapid systematic review

Background

During hospitalization older adults have a high risk of developing functional impairments unrelated to the reasons for their admission. This is termed hospital-associated disability (HAD). This systematic review aimed to assess the incidence of HAD in older adults admitted to acute care with two outcomes: firstly in at least one activity of daily living from a set of functional tasks (e.g., Katz Index) and secondly the incidence of functional decline in an individual functional task (e.g., bathing), and to identify any tools or functional tasks used to assess activities of daily living (ADL) in hospitalized older patients.

Methods

A rapid systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and reported the data according the PRISMA statement. A literature search was performed in Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases on 26 August 2021. Inclusion criteria: older adults (≥65 years), assessment of individual items of activities of daily living at baseline and discharge. Exclusion criterion: studies investigating a specific condition that could affect functional decline and studies that primarily examined a population with cognitive impairment. The protocol was registered on OSF registries (https://osf.io/9jez4/) identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9JEZ4.

Results

Ten studies were included in the final review. Incidence of HAD (overall score) was 37% (95% CI 0.30-0.43). Insufficient data prevented meta-analysis of the individual items. One study provided sufficient data to calculate incidence, with the following values for patients' self-reported dependencies: 32% for bathing, 27% for dressing, 27% for toileting, 30% for eating and 27% for transferring. The proxy reported the following values for patients' dependencies: 70% for bathing, 66% for dressing, 70% for toileting, 61% for eating and 59% for transferring. The review identified four assessment tools, two sets of tasks, and individual items assessing activities of daily living in such patients.

Conclusions

Incidence of hospital-associated disability in older patients might be overestimated, due to the combination of disease-related disability and hospital-associated disability. The tools used to assess these patients presented some limitations. These results should be interpreted with caution as only one study reported adequate information to assess the HAD incidence. At the item level, the latter was higher when disability was reported by the proxies than when it was reported by patients. This review highlights the lack of systematic reporting of data used to calculate HAD incidence. The methodological quality and the risk of bias in the included studies raised some concerns.

Optimal dose and type of physical activity to improve functional capacity and minimise adverse events in acutely hospitalised older adults: a systematic review with dose-response network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal dose and type of physical activity to improve functional capacity and reduce adverse events in acutely hospitalised older adults.

DESIGN

Systematic review and Bayesian model-based network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Four databases were searched from inception to 20 June 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Randomised controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of a physical activity-based intervention on at least one functional outcome in people aged ≥50 years hospitalised due to an acute medical condition were included. Pooled effect estimates (ie, standardised mean differences for functional capacity and the ratio of means for adverse events) were calculated using random treatment effects network meta-analysis models.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (3842 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Approximately 100 Metabolic Equivalents of Task per day (METs-min/day) (~40 min/day of light effort or ~25 min/day of moderate effort activities) was the minimal dose to improve the functional capacity of acute hospitalised older adults (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.28, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.01 to 0.55). The optimal dose was estimated at 159 METs-min/day (~70 min/day of light effort or ~40 min/day of moderate effort activities; SMD=0.41, 95% CrI 0.08 to 0.72). Ambulation was deemed the most efficient intervention, and the optimal dose was reached at 143 METs-min/day (~50 min/day of slow-paced walking; SMD=0.76, 95% CrI 0.35 to 1.16), showing a high evidential power (87.68%). The minimal effective ambulation dose was estimated at 74 METs-min/day (~25 min/day of slow-paced walking; SMD=0.25, 95% CrI 0.01 to 0.41). Physical activity interventions resulted in a decrease in the rate of adverse events compared with usual care at discharge (ratio of means=0.96, 95% CrI 0.95 to 0.97; median time 7 days).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis yielded low to moderate evidence supporting the use of in-hospital supervised physical activity programmes in acutely hospitalised older adults. As little as ~25 min/day of slow-paced walking is sufficient to improve functional capacity and minimise adverse events in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021271999.

Perspectives of patients and clinicians on older patient mobility on acute medical wards: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Low mobility during an acute care medical hospitalization is frequent and associated with adverse outcomes, particularly among older patients. Better understanding barriers and facilitators to improve mobility during hospitalization could help develop effective interventions. The goal of this study was to assess barriers and facilitators to older medical patients' hospital mobility, from the point of view of patients and clinicians, to develop a framework applicable in clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study in one university and two non-university hospitals of two different language and cultural regions of Switzerland, including 13 focus groups (FGs; five with patients, eight with clinicians). We included 24 adults aged 60 years or older hospitalized on an acute general internal medicine ward of one of the three participating hospitals during the previous years, and 34 clinicians (15 physicians, nine nurses/nursing assistants, 10 physiotherapists) working on those wards. The FG guides included open-ended questions exploring mobility experiences, expectations, barriers and facilitators to mobility, consequences of low mobility and knowledge on mobility. We applied an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified four themes of barriers and facilitators to mobility: 1) patient-related factors; 2) clinician-related factors; 3) social interactions; and 4) non-human factors. Clinician-related factors were only mentioned in clinician FGs. Otherwise, subthemes identified from patient and clinician FGs were similar and codes broadly overlapped. Subthemes included motivation, knowledge, expectations, mental and physical state (theme 1); process, knowledge - skills, mental state - motivation (theme 2); interpersonal relationships, support (theme 3); hospital setting - organization (theme 4).

CONCLUSIONS

From patients' and clinicians' perspectives, a broad spectrum of human and structural factors influences mobility of older patients hospitalized on an acute general internal medicine ward. New factors included privacy issues and role perception. Many of those factors are potentially actionable without additional staff resources. This study is a first step in participatory research to improve mobility of older medical inpatients.

Assisted ambulation to improve health outcomes for older medical inpatients (AMBULATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized older adults spend as much as 95% of their time in bed, which can result in adverse events and delay recovery while increasing costs. Observational studies have shown that general mobility interventions (e.g., ambulation) can mitigate adverse events and improve patients' functional status. Mobility technicians (MTs) may address the need for patients to engage in mobility interventions without overburdening nurses. There is no data, however, on the effect of MT-assisted ambulation on adverse events or functional status, or on the cost tradeoffs if a MT were employed. The AMBULATE study aims to determine whether MT-assisted ambulation improves mobility status and decreases adverse events for older medical inpatients. It will also include analyses to identify the patients that benefit most from MT-assisted mobility and assess the cost-effectiveness of employing a MT.

METHODS

The AMBULATE study is a multicenter, single-blind, parallel control design, individual-level randomized trial. It will include patients admitted to a medical service in five hospitals in two regions of the USA. Patients over age 65 with mild functional deficits will be randomized using a block randomization scheme. Those in the intervention group will ambulate with the MT up to three times daily, guided by the Johns Hopkins Mobility Goal Calculator. The intervention will conclude at hospital discharge, or after 10 days if the hospitalization is prolonged. The primary outcome is the Short Physical Performance Battery score at discharge. Secondary outcomes are discharge disposition, length of stay, hospital-acquired complications (falls, venous thromboembolism, pressure ulcers, and hospital-acquired pneumonia), and post-hospital functional status.

DISCUSSION

While functional decline in the hospital is multifactorial, ambulation is a modifiable factor for many patients. The AMBULATE study will be the largest randomized controlled trial to test the clinical effects of dedicating a single care team member to facilitating mobility for older hospitalized patients. It will also provide a useful estimation of cost implications to help hospital administrators assess the feasibility and utility of employing MTs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in the United States National Library of Medicine clinicaltrials.gov (# NCT05725928). February 13, 2023.

Multidimensional interventions to increase life-space mobility in older adults ranging from nursing home residents to community-dwelling: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Life-space mobility (LSM) is an important aspect of older adults' real-life mobility. Studies have shown that restricted LSM is a risk factor for many adverse outcomes such as low quality of life and mortality. Therefore, an increasing number of interventions aim to enhance LSM. However, the intervention approaches differ in terms of their type/content, duration, targeted populations, but also in terms of their outcome measures and assessment tools. Especially the latter impairs the comparability of studies with otherwise similar interventional approaches and thus also the interpretation of their results. Therefore, this systematic scoping review aims to provide an overview of the intervention components, assessment tools, and effectiveness of studies aiming to improve LSM in older adults.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed and Web of Science. We considered studies in older adults of any design that included an intervention approach and at least one outcome of LSM.

RESULTS

27 studies were included in the review. These studies analyzed healthy community-dwelling as well as frail older adults in need of care or rehabilitation and nursing home residents with a mean age between 64 and 89. The percentage of female participants ranged from 3 to 100%. The types of interventions were of the following: physical, counseling, multidimensional, miscellaneous. Multidimensional interventions consisting of physical interventions plus any of the following or a combination of counseling/education/motivation/information appear to be most effective in increasing LSM. Older adults with mobility impairments were more responsive to these multidimensional interventions compared to healthy older adults. Most of the studies used the questionnaire-based Life-Space Assessment to quantify LSM.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of a heterogenous stock of literature investigating LSM-related interventions in older adults. Future meta-analyses are needed to provide a quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of LSM interventions and recommendations.

Relationship Between Mobility and Falls in the Hospital Setting

Introduction

Patients spend an inordinate amount of time in bed during acute care hospitalization leading to immobility harms and poor outcomes. Research has shown that structured mobility programs can decrease functional decline and hospital acquired conditions. Patient falls have financial consequences for hospitals along with potentially severe consequences to the patient. Analysis of this quality improvement project data aimed to determine the relationship between patient mobility levels and quantity of hospital falls.

Methods

Our quality improvement team tracked the average Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scores along with hospital fall occurrences during a set time period (2021-2022). We additionally highlighted our lived experiences regarding the relationship to mobility and falls in a typical hospitalized patient and patient outcomes. This provided examples of where the deconditioned patient improved with increased mobility and activity, as well as when the converse occurred.

Results

28,075 patients discharged from a 247-bed acute care hospital from January 2021 to March 2022 were included in the sample. During this timeframe, falls were more likely to occur as patients became deconditioned and immobilized during hospitalization. Increased mobility did not lead to increased risk of falls and a clear inverse relationship was demonstrated between mobility levels and falls.

Conclusions

The growing body of evidence that links falls and immobility supports the continuation of inpatient mobility promotion quality improvement initiatives. We found frequent patient mobilization helped to prevent these harms.

Effects of Implementation of a Supervised Walking Program in Veterans Affairs Hospitals : A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

In trials, hospital walking programs have been shown to improve functional ability after discharge, but little evidence exists about their effectiveness under routine practice conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of implementation of a supervised walking program known as STRIDE (AssiSTed EaRly MobIlity for HospitalizeD VEterans) on discharge to a skilled-nursing facility (SNF), length of stay (LOS), and inpatient falls.

DESIGN

Stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03300336).

SETTING

8 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 20 August 2017 to 19 August 2019.

PATIENTS

Analyses included hospitalizations involving patients aged 60 years or older who were community dwelling and admitted for 2 or more days to a participating medicine ward.

INTERVENTION

Hospitals were randomly assigned in 2 stratified blocks to a launch date for STRIDE. All hospitals received implementation support according to the Replicating Effective Programs framework.

MEASUREMENTS

The prespecified primary outcomes were discharge to a SNF and hospital LOS, and having 1 or more inpatient falls was exploratory. Generalized linear mixed models were fit to account for clustering of patients within hospitals and included patient-level covariates.

RESULTS

Patients in pre-STRIDE time periods (n = 6722) were similar to post-STRIDE time periods (n = 6141). The proportion of patients with any documented walk during a potentially eligible hospitalization ranged from 0.6% to 22.7% per hospital. The estimated rates of discharge to a SNF were 13% pre-STRIDE and 8% post-STRIDE. In adjusted models, odds of discharge to a SNF were lower among eligible patients hospitalized in post-STRIDE time periods (odds ratio [OR], 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.8]) compared with pre-STRIDE. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses. There were no differences in LOS (rate ratio, 1.0 [CI, 0.9 to 1.1]) or having an inpatient fall (OR, 0.8 [CI, 0.5 to 1.1]).

LIMITATION

Direct program reach was low.

CONCLUSION

Although the reach was limited and variable, hospitalizations occurring during the STRIDE hospital walking program implementation period had lower odds of discharge to a SNF, with no change in hospital LOS or inpatient falls.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (Optimizing Function and Independence QUERI).

Comprehensive assessment of postoperative mobility during the first days after mini-invasive lung surgery: A prospective observational study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Postoperative physical therapy and early mobilization are major elements for enhanced recovery after surgery. In contrast with supervised physical therapy sessions that can be monitored, self-mobilization is not easily quantifiable and has so far been estimated mainly through patient auto-reports. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive and objective evaluation of postoperative mobility.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Postoperative setting.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing mini-invasive lung surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Measurement of postoperative mobility during the first five postoperative days using an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the number of daily steps. Secondary outcomes included physical activity duration and intensity, sedentary time, number of breaks in sedentary time, sedentary patterns, daily evaluation by physiotherapists, postoperative complications, and acceptability of wearing the accelerometer.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study, of whom 56 provided at least one day of valid accelerometry data. There was no significant change during the first four PODs concerning the number of daily steps nor the mean cadence. One-minute cadence peak, total activity counts, and duration of light-intensity physical activity increased over time (p = 0.032, p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Sedentary patterns changed favorably over time, with a decrease in prolonged sedentary bouts (≥ 60 consecutive min) (p < 0.001), and an increase in shorter bouts (< 10 min) (p = 0.001). Similar results were observed when analysis was adjusted for the day of the week when the surgery took place. The median acceptability of wearing the accelerometer was excellent (median 10 [9-10] on a 10-point Likert scale). Three patients had major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that daily steps may not be the only relevant indicator of early mobility following thoracic surgery and that accelerometry is suitable to follow patients' early postoperative activity.

A unit-based, multi-center evaluation of adopting mobility measures and daily mobility goals in the hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Promoting patient mobility helps improve patient outcomes, but mobility status is not widely tracked nor do patients have specific individualized mobility goals.

PURPOSE

We evaluated nursing adoption of mobility measures and daily mobility goal achievement using the Johns Hopkins Mobility Goal Calculator (JH-MGC), a tool to guide an individualized patient mobility goal based on the level of mobility capacity.

METHOD

Built on a translating research into practice framework, the Johns Hopkins Activity and Mobility Promotion (JH-AMP) program was the vehicle to promote use of the mobility measures and the JH-MGC. We evaluated a large-scale implementation effort of this program on 23 units across two medical centers.

FINDINGS

Units significantly improved documentation compliance to mobility measures and achieving daily mobility goals. Units with the highest documentation compliance rates had higher rates of daily mobility goal achievement, especially for longer distance ambulation goals.

DISCUSSION

The JH-AMP program improved adoption of mobility status tracking and higher nursing inpatient mobility levels.

A systematic review and meta-analysis: Assessment of hospital walking programs among older patients

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess effect of hospital walking programs on outcomes for older inpatients and to characterize hospital walking dose reported across studies.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis examining impact of hospital walking and/or reported walking dose among medical-surgical inpatients. For inclusion, studies were observational or experimental, published in English, enrolled inpatients aged ≥ 65 yrs hospitalized for medical or surgical reasons.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, NICHSR, OneSearch, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PsycINFO were completed in December 2020. Two reviewers screened sources, extracted data, and performed quality bias appraisal.

RESULTS

Hospital walking dose was reported in 6 studies and commonly as steps/24 hr. Length of stay (LOS) was a common outcome reported. Difference in combined mean LOS between walking and control groups was -5.89 days. Heterogeneity across studies was considerable (I2  = 96%) suggesting poor precision of estimates. Additional, high-quality trials examining hospital walking and patient outcomes of older patients is needed.

The more you have, the more you lose: Muscle mass changes in trauma patients with prolonged hospitalizations

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia is a clinically relevant loss of muscle mass with implications of increased morbidity and mortality in adult trauma populations.  Our study aimed to evaluate loss of muscle mass change in adult trauma patients with prolonged hospital stays.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis using institutional trauma registry to identify all adult trauma patients with hospital length of stay >14 days admitted to our Level 1 center between 2010 and 2017. All CT images were reviewed, and cross-sectional area (cm²) of the left psoas muscle was measured at the level of the third lumbar vertebral body to determine total psoas area (TPA) and Total Psoas Index (TPI) normalized for patient stature.  Sarcopenia was defined as a TPI on admission below gender specific thresholds of 5.45(cm²/m²) in men and 3.85(cm²/m²) in women.  TPA, TPI, and rates of change in TPI were then evaluated and compared between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic adult trauma patients.

RESULTS

There were 81 adult trauma patients who met inclusion criteria. The average change in TPA was -3.8 cm² and TPI was -1.3 cm². On admission, 23% (n = 19) of patients were sarcopenic while 77% (n = 62) were not. Non-sarcopenic patients had a significantly greater change in TPA (-4.9 vs. -0.31, p<0.0001), TPI (-1.7 vs. -0.13, p<0.0001), and rate of decrease in muscle mass (p = 0.0002). 37% of patients who were admitted with normal muscle mass developed sarcopenia during admission.  Older age was the only risk factor independently associated with developing sarcopenia (OR: 1.04, 95%CI 1.00-1.08, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Over a third of patients with normal muscle mass at admission subsequently developed sarcopenia with older age as the primary risk factor. Patients with normal muscle mass at admission had greater decreases in TPA and TPI, and accelerated rates of muscle mass loss compared to sarcopenic patients.

Promoting Safe Mobility Strategies for partnering with caregivers to maximize older adults' functional ability

This article is the fifth in a series, Supporting Family Caregivers in the 4Ms of an Age-Friendly Health System, published in collaboration with the AARP Public Policy Institute as part of the ongoing Supporting Family Caregivers: No Longer Home Alone series. The 4Ms of an Age-Friendly Health System (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) is an evidence-based framework for assessing and acting on critical issues in the care of older adults across settings and transitions of care. Engaging the health care team, including older adults and their family caregivers, with the 4Ms framework can help to ensure that every older adult gets the best care possible, is not harmed by health care, and is satisfied with the care they receive. The articles in this series present considerations for implementing the 4Ms framework in the inpatient hospital setting and incorporating family caregivers in doing so. Resources for both nurses and family caregivers, including a series of accompanying videos developed by AARP and the Rush Center for Excellence in Aging and funded by The John A. Hartford Foundation, are also provided. Nurses should read the articles first, so they understand how best to help family caregivers. Then they can refer caregivers to the informational tear sheet-Information for Family Caregivers-and instructional videos, encouraging them to ask questions. For additional information, see Resources for Nurses. Cite this article as: Olson,L.M., et al. Promote Safe Mobility. Am J Nurs 2022; 122(7): 46-52.

Effects of an electronic health record-based mobility assessment and automated referral for inpatient physical therapy on patient outcomes: A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a hospital physical therapy (PT) referral triggered by scores on a mobility assessment embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) and completed by nursing staff on hospital admission.

DATA SOURCES

EHR and billing data from 12 acute care hospitals in a western Pennsylvania health system (January 2017-February 2018) and 11 acute care hospitals in a northeastern Ohio health system (August 2019-July 2021).

STUDY DESIGN

We utilized a regression discontinuity design to compare patients admitted to PA hospitals with stroke who reached the mobility score threshold for an EHR-PT referral (treatment) to those who did not (control). Outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission or mortality. Control variables included demographics, insurance, income, and comorbidities. Hospital systems with EHR-PT referrals were also compared to those without (OH hospitals as alternative control). Subgroup analyses based on age were also conducted.

DATA EXTRACTION

We identified adult patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of stroke and mobility assessments completed by nursing (n = 4859 in PA hospitals, n = 1749 in OH hospitals) who completed their inpatient stay.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In the PA hospitals, patients with EHR-PT referrals had an 11.4 percentage-point decrease in their 30-day readmission or mortality rates (95% CI -0.57, -0.01) relative to the control. This effect was not observed in the OH hospitals for 30-day readmission (β = 0.01; 95% CI -0.25, 0.26). Adults over 60 years old with EHR-PT referrals in PA had a 26.2 percentage-point (95% CI -0.88, -0.19) decreased risk of readmission or mortality compared to those without. Unclear relationships exist between EHR-PT referrals and hospital LOS in PA.

CONCLUSIONS

Health systems should consider methodologies to facilitate early acute care hospital PT referrals informed by mobility assessments.

Feasibility and Acceptability of an INtervention TO Increase MOBility in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients (INTOMOB): A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

Background: To reduce adverse outcomes of low hospital mobility, we need interventions that are scalable in everyday practice. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the INTOMOB multilevel intervention addressing barriers to hospital mobility without requiring unavailable resources. Methods: The INTOMOB intervention, targeting older patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the hospital environment, was implemented on acute general internal medicine wards of three hospitals (12/2022-03/2023). Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were assessed and two types of accelerometers compared in a mixed methods study (patient and HCP surveys and interviews). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data using a deductive approach. Results were integrated through meta-inferences. Results: Of 20 patients (mean age 74.1 years), 90% found the intervention helpful and 82% said the environment intervention (posters) stimulated mobility. The majority of 44 HCPs described the intervention as clear and helpful. There was no major implementation or technical issue. About 60% of patients and HCPs preferred a wrist-worn over an ankle-worn accelerometer. Conclusions: The INTOMOB intervention is feasible and well accepted. Patients' and HCPs' feedback allowed to further improve the intervention that will be tested in a cluster randomized trial and provides useful information for future mobility-fostering interventions.

The Effectiveness of Frailty Intervention for Older Patients with Frailty during Hospitalization

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention program on the change in functional status of hospitalized older adults.

DESIGN

This single-arm, prospective, non-randomized interventional study investigates the efficacy of a multidomain interventional program including cognitive stimulation activity, simple exercises, frailty education, and nutrition counseling.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

At a tertiary hospital in southern Taiwan, 352 eligible patients were sequentially enrolled. Included patients were aged ≥65 years (mean age, 79.6 ± 9.0 years; 62% male), scored 3-7 on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and were hospitalized in the geriatric acute ward.

INTERVENTION

Those receiving standard care (physical rehabilitation and nutrition counseling) during January-July 2019 composed the historical control group. Those receiving the multidomain intervention during August-December 2019 composed the intervention group.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the change in activities of daily life (ADL) and frailty status, as assessed by Katz Index and Clinical Frailty Scale, with using the generalized estimating equation model. The length of hospital stay, medical costs, and re-admission rates were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants undergoing intervention (n = 101; 27.9%) showed greater improvements in the ADL and CFS during hospitalization (ADL adjusted estimate, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.11-1.11; p = 0.02; CFS adjusted estimate, -1.11; 95% CI, -1.42- -0.80; p < 0.01), shorter length of hospital stay (adjusted estimate, -5.00; 95% CI, -7.99- -2.47; p < 0.01), lower medical costs (adjusted estimate, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49-0.69; p < 0.01), and lower 30- and 90-day readmission rates (30-day adjusted OR [aOR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.27-0.50; p < 0.01; 60-day aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33; p < 0.01) than did controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the multidomain intervention program during hospitalization improved the functional status and decreased the hospital stay length, medical costs, and readmission rates of frail older people.

The effects of nurse driven mobility intervention (NDMI) on activities of daily living, mobility, fear of falling, and balance performance in hospitalized older patients: A pilot study

A decrease in mobilization during hospitalization leads to a decline in physical function for older patients, and nurses play a critical role in mobility promotion. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility of Nurse Driven Mobility Intervention (NDMI) in improving activities of daily living, mobility, fear of falling, balance performance, and maladaptive fall risk appraisal using a one-group pretest-posttest design. NDMI incorporates a multidisciplinary care team, early assessment, timely and frequent mobilization, and constant encouragement. A post-intervention interview was also conducted to explore the barriers and facilitators for mobilization during hospitalization. The result shows a significant improvement in balance performance.

The hospital care experiences of older patients compared to younger patients

BACKGROUND

Hospitals may provide less positive patient experiences for older than younger patients.

METHODS

We used 2019 HCAHPS data from 4358 hospitals to compare patient-mix adjusted HCAHPS Survey scores for 19 experience of care items for patients ages 75+ versus 55-74 years and tested for interactions of age group with patient and hospital characteristics. We contrasted the age patterns observed for inpatient experiences with those among respondents to the 2019 Medicare CAHPS (MCAHPS) Survey of overall experience.

RESULTS

Patients 75+ years (31% of all HCAHPS respondents) reported less-positive experiences than those 55-74 (46% of respondents) for 18 of 19 substantive HCAHPS items (mean difference -3.3% points). Age differences in HCAHPS top-box scores were large (>5 points) for 1 of 3 Nurse Communication items, 1 of 3 Doctor Communication, 2 of 2 Communication about Medication items, 1 of 2 Discharge Information items, and 2 of 3 Care Transition items. In contrast, for MCAHPS, those 75+ reported similar experiences to younger adults. The magnitude of age differences varied considerably across hospitals; some hospitals had very large age disparities for older patients (age 75+ vs. ages 55-74), while others had none. These age differences were generally smaller for patients in government and non-profit than in for-profit hospitals, and in the Pacific region than in other parts of the United States. This variation in age disparities across hospitals may help to identify best practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ages 75+ reported less-positive experiences than patients ages 55-74, especially for measures of communication. These differences may be specific to inpatient care. Further study should investigate the effectiveness of hospital staffs' communication with older patients. Hospital protocols designed for younger patients may need to be adjusted to meet the needs of older patients. There may also be opportunities to learn from outpatient interactions with older patients.

Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of hospitalised older adults experience hospital-associated functional decline. Exercise interventions that promote in-hospital activity may prevent deconditioning and thereby maintain physical function during hospitalisation. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of exercise interventions for acutely hospitalised older medical inpatients on functional ability, quality of life (QoL), participant global assessment of success and adverse events compared to usual care or a sham-control intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was May 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating an in-hospital exercise intervention in people aged 65 years or older admitted to hospital with a general medical condition. We excluded people admitted for elective reasons or surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our major outcomes were 1. independence with activities of daily living; 2. functional mobility; 3. new incidence of delirium during hospitalisation; 4. QoL; 5. number of falls during hospitalisation; 6. medical deterioration during hospitalisation and 7. participant global assessment of success. Our minor outcomes were 8. death during hospitalisation; 9. musculoskeletal injuries during hospitalisation; 10. hospital length of stay; 11. new institutionalisation at hospital discharge; 12. hospital readmission and 13. walking performance. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each major outcome. We categorised exercise interventions as: rehabilitation-related activities (interventions designed to increase physical activity or functional recovery, but did not follow a specified exercise protocol); structured exercise (interventions that included an exercise intervention protocol but did not include progressive resistance training); and progressive resistance exercise (interventions that included an element of progressive resistance training).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 24 studies (nine rehabilitation-related activity interventions, six structured exercise interventions and nine progressive resistance exercise interventions) with 7511 participants. All studies compared exercise interventions to usual care; two studies, in addition to usual care, used sham interventions. Mean ages ranged from 73 to 88 years, and 58% of participants were women. Several studies were at high risk of bias. The most common domain assessed at high risk of bias was measurement of the outcome, and five studies (21%) were at high risk of bias arising from the randomisation process. Exercise may have no clinically important effect on independence in activities of daily living at discharge from hospital compared to controls (16 studies, 5174 participants; low-certainty evidence). Five studies used the Barthel Index (scale: 0 to 100, higher scores representing greater independence). Mean scores at discharge in the control groups ranged from 42 to 96 points, and independence in activities of daily living was 1.8 points better (0.43 worse to 4.12 better) with exercise compared to controls. The minimally clinical important difference (MCID) is estimated to be 11 points. We are uncertain regarding the effect of exercise on functional mobility at discharge from the hospital compared to controls (8 studies, 2369 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Three studies used the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (scale: 0 to 12, higher scores representing better function) to measure functional mobility. Mean scores at discharge in the control groups ranged from 3.7 to 4.9 points on the SPPB, and the estimated effect of the exercise interventions was 0.78 points better (0.02 worse to 1.57 better). A change of 1 point on the SPPB represents an MCID. We are uncertain regarding the effect of exercise on the incidence of delirium during hospitalisation compared to controls (7 trials, 2088 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The incidence of delirium during hospitalisation was 88/1091 (81 per 1000) in the control group compared with 70/997 (73 per 1000; range 47 to 114) in the exercise group (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.41). Exercise interventions may result in a small clinically unimportant improvement in QoL at discharge from the hospital compared to controls (4 studies, 875 participants; low-certainty evidence). Mean QoL on the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) visual analogue scale (VAS) (scale: 0 to 100, higher scores representing better QoL) ranged between 48.9 and 64.7 in the control group at discharge from the hospital, and QoL was 6.04 points better (0.9 better to 11.18 better) with exercise. A change of 10 points on the EQ-5D VAS represents an MCID. No studies measured participant global assessment of success. Exercise interventions did not affect the risk of falls during hospitalisation (moderate-certainty evidence). The incidence of falls was 31/899 (34 per 1000) in the control group compared with 31/888 (34 per 1000; range 20 to 57) in the exercise group (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.65). We are uncertain regarding the effect of exercise on the incidence of medical deterioration during hospitalisation (very low-certainty evidence). The incidence of medical deterioration in the control group was 101/1417 (71 per 1000) compared with 96/1313 (73 per 1000; range 44 to 120) in the exercise group (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.68). Subgroup analyses by different intervention categories and by the use of a sham intervention were not meaningfully different from the main analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Exercise may make little difference to independence in activities of daily living or QoL, but probably does not result in more falls in older medical inpatients. We are uncertain about the effect of exercise on functional mobility, incidence of delirium and medical deterioration. Certainty of evidence was limited by risk of bias and inconsistency. Future primary research on the effect of exercise on acute hospitalisation could focus on more consistent and uniform reporting of participant's characteristics including their baseline level of functional ability, as well as exercise dose, intensity and adherence that may provide an insight into the reasons for the observed inconsistencies in findings.

Análise de Força Muscular e Mobilidade de Pacientes com Câncer Hematológico Atendidos pela Fisioterapia em um Centro de Assistência de Alta Complexidade em Oncologia

Introdução: Câncer é o nome dado a um conjunto de mais de 100 doenças, caracterizado pelo crescimento anormal e acelerado de células, podendo ser considerado sólido ou hematológico. As neoplasias hematológicas levam a alterações específicas que podem contribuir para a inatividade, principalmente pelo alto risco de sangramento, induzindo perdas funcionais, tornando importante a realização da fisioterapia para prevenir ou minimizar essas perdas. Objetivo: Analisar a força muscular e a mobilidade de pacientes com câncer hematológico internados em um hospital de referência do Distrito Federal. Método: Estudo quantitativo, retrospectivo e longitudinal. A coleta foi realizada a partir de dados secundários de prontuários eletrônicos e planilhas de acompanhamento da fisioterapia, abrangendo o período de junho a dezembro de 2020. Foram analisadas a força muscular, por meio da dinamometria manual e da escala Medical Research Council (MRC), e a mobilidade, por meio da ICU Mobility Scale (IMS). Resultados: Dos 86 indivíduos rastreados, 43 foram elegíveis para a pesquisa. A análise entre a admissão e a alta hospitalar não revelou diferenças significativas na força muscular e mobilidade. Houve associação moderada e significativa entre MRC e IMS na admissão (r=0,575 e p<0,001) e na alta (r=0,481 e p=0,001). Não houve associações significativas entre dinamometria e mobilidade. Conclusão: Este estudo permitiu identificar o perfil dos pacientes onco-hematológicos em acompanhamento, sugerindo que a fisioterapia contribuiu para a manutenção da funcionalidade desses doentes.