Are We Overtreating Isolated Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism?: First Do No Harm

Left atrium volume and ventricular volume ratio algorithm as indication of pulmonary hypertension etiology

BACKGROUND

Pressure overload of the right heart (pulmonary hypertension [PH]) can be an acute or a chronic process with various pathophysiologic changes affecting the dimensions of the heart chambers. The automatic four-chamber volumetric analysis tool is now available to measure the volume of the cardiac chambers in patients undergoing a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA).

PURPOSE

To characterize the volumetric changes that occurred in response to increased systolic pulmonary arterial pressures (sPAP) in acute events, such as acute pulmonary embolism (APE), compared with other etiologies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent CTPA and echocardiography within 24 h between 2011 and 2015 were included. Differences in cardiac chamber volumes were investigated in correlation to the patients' sPAP.

RESULTS

The final cohort of 961 patients included 221 (23%) patients diagnosed with APE. The right (RV) to left (LV) ventricular volume ratio (VVR) was higher, while the left atrial (LA) volume index was smaller (P < 0.001) in the patients with APE. A decision tree for the prediction of APE showed that an RV to left VVR >2.8 was characteristic of APE, whereas an LA volume index >37.5 mL/m² was more compatible with PH due to other etiologies (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combination of VVR and LA volume index may help in differentiating between APE and chronic PH. CTPA-based volumetric information may be used to help clarify the underlying etiology of the dyspnea.

The value of distinguishing patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism presenting to two tertiary hospitals in Australia: an observational study

Isolated-subsegmental-pulmonary-embolism (SSPE) is increasingly diagnosed with the use of computed-tomography-pulmonary-angiogram (CTPA). There remains clinical equipoise for management of SSPE with previous studies not accounting for frailty while determining clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes among patients with isolated SSPE were compared with those with a more proximal PE after accounting for frailty and other risk-factors. This study included all patients with a positive CTPA for pulmonary embolism (PE) admitted between 2017 and 2021 to two Australian-tertiary-hospitals. Frailty was determined by use of the hospital-frailty-risk-score (HFRS). Competing-risk-analysis and Cox-proportional hazard models determined the cumulative-risk of VTE and mortality within 3 months and 1 year of index PE event after adjustment for frailty and other variables. Of 334 patients with positive CTPA for PE, 111 (33.2%) had isolated-SSPE. The mean (SD) age was 64.3 (17.7) years, 50.9% were males and 9.6% were frail. The risk of recurrent VTE within 3-months (0.9% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.458) and within 1-year of follow-up (2.7% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.126) did not differ significantly between patients with isolated SSPE and those with more proximal PE. After adjusted analyses, the cumulative-incidence of recurrent VTE was not different among patients with isolated SSPE within 1 year of index event [subdistribution-hazard-ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.60]. Similarly, mortality within 1 year of index event was also not different between the two groups (aHR 1.72, 95% CI 0.92-3.23). The prevalence of SSPE was 33.2% and even after adjustment for frailty these patients had no different clinical outcomes than those with proximal PE.

Challenges in Managing Isolated Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism

This commentary explores the clinical conundrums arising when caring for patients with acute pulmonary embolism isolated to the subsegmental pulmonary arteries. We discuss ways to confirm the radiologic diagnosis, how to distinguish patients for whom anticoagulation is indicated from those who are eligible for structured surveillance without anticoagulation, what surveillance entails, and why ensuring continuity of care matters. We report a case from our own experience that illustrates these decision-making crossroads and highlights the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. Because the evidence in the literature is currently weak and indirect, we draw on expert opinion in US and European guidelines, a recent statement from a multidisciplinary consensus panel, and several ongoing well-designed clinical trials. This discussion will help clinicians better manage the spectrum of patients who present with isolated subsegmental embolism.

Clinical Surveillance vs. Anticoagulation For low-risk patiEnts with isolated SubSegmental Pulmonary Embolism: protocol for a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial (SAFE-SSPE)

INTRODUCTION

The clinical significance of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) is currently unclear. Although growing evidence from observational studies suggests that withholding anticoagulant treatment may be a safe option in selected patients with isolated SSPE, most patients with this condition receive anticoagulant treatment, which is associated with a 90-day risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) of 0.8% and major bleeding of up to 5%. Given the ongoing controversy concerning the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation for isolated SSPE and the lack of evidence from randomised-controlled studies, the aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clinical surveillance without anticoagulation in low-risk patients with isolated SSPE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SAFE-SSPE (Surveillance vs. Anticoagulation For low-risk patiEnts with isolated SubSegmental Pulmonary Embolism, a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial) is an international, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group non-inferiority trial conducted in Switzerland, the Netherlands and Canada. Low-risk patients with isolated SSPE are randomised to receive clinical surveillance with either placebo (no anticoagulation) or anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban. All patients undergo bilateral whole-leg compression ultrasonography to exclude concomitant deep vein thrombosis before enrolment. Patients are followed for 90 days. The primary outcome is symptomatic recurrent VTE (efficacy). The secondary outcomes include clinically significant bleeding and all-cause mortality (safety). The ancillary outcomes are health-related quality of life, functional status and medical resource utilisation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The local ethics committees in Switzerland have approved this protocol. Submission to the Ethical Committees in the Netherlands and Canada is underway. The results of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04263038.

Isolated Pulmonary Embolism Is Associated With a High Risk of Arterial Thrombotic Disease: Results From the VTEval Study

BACKGROUND

Isolated PE is associated with a higher burden of atherosclerotic disease than other manifestations of VTE.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We hypothesized that the presence of isolated PE may signal a chronically elevated risk of arterial thrombotic disease.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from the VTEval Study, a prospective cohort study enrolling individuals with clinical suspicion and imaging-based diagnosis or exclusion of VTE, were analyzed. Patients with PE received whole-leg ultrasonography to assess presence of DVT. Regularized logistic regression identified features that discriminate between isolated PE and other VTE phenotypes at clinical presentation. Survival analyses were performed to evaluate the crude and adjusted 3-year risks of arterial thrombotic disease, recurrent VTE, and death.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 510 patients. Isolated PE patients (n = 63) had a distinct clinical profile from patients with other VTE phenotypes (n = 447). COPD, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease were significantly more prevalent among patients with isolated PE. Isolated PE patients had significantly higher risk (incidence rate ratio vs DVT-associated PE, 3.7 (95% CI, 1.3-10.8, P = .009); vs isolated DVT, 4.8 (1.7-14.3, P = .001) of arterial thrombotic events (ie, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack). After adjustment for clinical profile and medication intake, the risk of arterial thrombotic events for patients with isolated PE remained quadruple that of other VTE phenotypes (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8 [1.3-10.9], P = .01).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with isolated PE are at higher risk for arterial thrombosis and may require screening for arterial disease and development of novel therapeutic strategies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02156401.

Clinical presentation and outcomes in elderly patients with symptomatic isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVES

Data are limited on clinical presentation and outcomes in elderly patients with acute symptomatic isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE). We compared clinical presentation, risk factors, processes of care, and outcomes between elderly patients with SSPE and patients with more proximal pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

We prospectively followed 578 patients aged ≥65 years with acute symptomatic isolated SSPE or proximal PE in a multicentre Swiss cohort study. We compared quality of life at three months using the PEmb-QoL, and examined the independent association between localization of PE and clinical outcomes (recurrent venous thromboembolism [VTE], overall mortality) using regression models with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 11% of patients had isolated SSPE. Patients with SSPE were less likely to have a pulse ≥110/min (3% vs. 13%), but more likely to have active cancer (28% vs. 15%) and to receive outpatient care (11% vs. 4%) than patients with proximal PE. Virtually all patients (98%) with SSPE received anticoagulants. Quality of life did not differ between the groups at 3 months. No patient with SSPE vs. seven patients with proximal PE died from the index PE event. No significant difference was observed for the 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE (7% vs. 12%) and death (29% vs. 20%). After adjustment, SSPE was not associated with a lower risk of clinical outcomes than proximal PE.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical presentation and incidences of adverse outcomes did not differ significantly between elderly patients with SSPE or proximal PE, although the power to detect differences might have been limited given the small number of events. Thus, our study does not provide evidence that unselected, elderly patients with SSPE have a more benign clinical course.