Analysis of Computed Tomography Radiation Doses Used for Lung Cancer Screening Scans

Types of Evidence Needed to Assess the Clinical Value of Diagnostic Imaging

AbstractThe evidence underlying the use of advanced diagnostic imaging is based mainly on diagnostic accuracy studies and not on well-designed trials demonstrating improved patient outcomes. This has led to an expansion of low-value and potentially harmful patient care and raises ethical issues around the widespread implementation of tests with incompletely known benefits and harms. Randomized clinical trials are needed to support the safety and effectiveness of imaging tests and should be required for clearance of most new technologies. Large, diverse cohort studies are needed to quantify disease risk associated with many imaging findings, especially incidental findings, to enable evidence-based management. The responsibility to minimize the use of tests with unknown or low value requires engagement of clinicians, medical societies, and the public.

Evaluation of an in-use chest CT protocol in lung cancer screening - A single institutional study

Background

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and therefore there has been a growing demand for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) protocols.

Purpose

To investigate and evaluate the dose and image quality of patients undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) using LDCT in Norway.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP), from 70 average-size and 70 large-size patients who underwent LDCT scan for LCS were included in the survey. Effective dose and size-specific dose were calculated for each examination and were compared with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) requirement. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined for different regions in the chest with two iterative reconstruction techniques, iDose and Iterative Model Reconstruction. Differences in dose and image quality between average-size and large-size patients were evaluated by Independent sample t test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test within the same patient group.

Results

The independent sample t test revealed significant differences (p < .05) in dose values between average-size and large-size patients. Mean CTDIvol and DLP for average-size patients were 2.8 mGy and 115 mGy.cm, respectively, with appropriate increment for the large-size patients. Image quality (image noise, SNR, and CNR) did not significantly differ between patient groups when images were reconstructed with a model based iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Conclusion

The screening protocol assessed in this study resulted in CTDIvol values that were compliant with AAPM recommendation. No significant differences in objective image quality were found between patient groups.

Refining Surveillance Guidelines after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). Surveillance guidelines vary after treatment. While patients are more likely to locally recur within 2 years of treatment, there remains a paucity of data on the benefit of frequent and long-term surveillance. We evaluated a cohort of NSCLC patients to evaluate surveillance patterns and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ES-NSCLC treated with SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Imaging was reviewed after SBRT for evidence of recurrence or new malignancy. The median scan interval (MSI) was calculated as the median number of months between surveillance scans. The MSI between patients with or without new disease was compared by t-test. New disease development and survival between patients with =T2 disease and with or without prior malignancy was compared using χ², Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Gray's test.

RESULTS

A cohort of 168 patients with median follow up of 23.4 months met criteria for review with 50% developing new disease. MSI did not differ between patients with or without new disease. Patients with >=cT2 tumors had worse overall survival and trended towards higher incidence of new disease. New disease continued to occur, even 5 years after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Increased scan frequency did not increase detection of new disease. Patients continued to fail 5 years after treatment. Larger tumors trended toward more frequent failures and those patients experienced worse OS. Surveillance guidelines should be optimized to prevent over surveillance after treatment and to continue long-term surveillance.

Investigating the Small Pixel Effect in Ultra-High Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lung

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate potential benefits of ultra-high resolution (UHR) over standard resolution scan mode in ultra-low dose photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) of the lung.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six cadaveric specimens were examined with 5 dose settings using tin prefiltration, each in UHR (120 × 0.2 mm) and standard mode (144 × 0.4 mm), on a first-generation PCD-CT scanner. Image quality was evaluated quantitatively by noise comparisons in the trachea and both main bronchi. In addition, 16 readers (14 radiologists and 2 internal medicine physicians) independently completed a browser-based pairwise forced-choice comparison task for assessment of subjective image quality. The Kendall rank coefficient ( W ) was calculated to assess interrater agreement, and Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ) was used to analyze the relationship between noise measurements and image quality rankings.

RESULTS

Across all dose levels, image noise in UHR mode was lower than in standard mode for scan protocols matched by CTDI vol ( P < 0.001). UHR examinations exhibited noise levels comparable to the next higher dose setting in standard mode ( P ≥ 0.275). Subjective ranking of protocols based on 5760 pairwise tests showed high interrater agreement ( W = 0.99; P ≤ 0.001) with UHR images being preferred by readers in the majority of comparisons. Irrespective of scan mode, a substantial indirect correlation was observed between image noise and subjective image quality ranking ( r = -0.97; P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In PCD-CT of the lung, UHR scan mode reduces image noise considerably over standard resolution acquisition. Originating from the smaller detector element size in fan direction, the small pixel effect allows for superior image quality in ultra-low dose examinations with considerable potential for radiation dose reduction.

An evaluation of CT radiation doses within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate radiation doses for all low-dose CT scans performed during the first year of a lung screening trial.

METHODS

For all lung screening scans that were performed using a CT protocol that delivered image quality meeting the RSNA QIBA criteria, radiation dose metrics, participant height, weight, gender, and age were recorded. Values of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were evaluated as a function of weight in order to assess the performance of the scan protocol across the participant cohort. Calculated effective doses were used to establish the additional lifetime attributable cancer risks arising from trial scans.

RESULTS

Median values of CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose (IQR) from the 3521 scans were 1.1 mGy (0.70), 42.4 mGycm (24.9), and 1.15 mSv (0.67), whilst for 60-80kg participants the values were 1.0 mGy (0.30), 35.8 mGycm (11.4), and 0.97 mSv (0.31). A statistically significant correlation between CTDIvol and weight was identified for males (r = 0.9123, P < .001) and females (r = 0.9052, P < .001), however, the effect of gender on CTDIvol was not statistically significant (P = .2328) despite notable differences existing at the extremes of the weight range. The additional lifetime attributable cancer risks from a single scan were in the range 0.001%-0.006%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low radiation doses can be achieved across a typical lung screening cohort using scan protocols that have been shown to deliver high levels of image quality. The observed dose levels may be considered as typical values for lung screening scans on similar types of scanners for an equivalent participant cohort.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Presentation of typical radiation dose levels for CT lung screening examinations in a large UK trial. Effective radiation doses can be of the order of 1 mSv for standard sized participants. Lifetime attributable cancer risks resulting from a single low-dose CT scan did not exceed 0.006%.

Capability for dose reduction while maintaining nodule detection: Comparison of silver and copper X-ray spectrum modulation filters for chest CT using a phantom study with different reconstruction methods

PURPOSE

To compare the capability of CTs obtained with a silver or copper x-ray beam spectral modulation filter (Ag filter and Cu filter) and reconstructed with FBP, hybrid-type IR and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for radiation dose reduction for lung nodule detection using a chest phantom study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A chest CT phantom was scanned with a 320-detector row CT with Ag filter at 0.6, 1.6 and 2.5 mGy and Cu filters at 0.6, 1.6, 2.5 and 9.6 mGy, and reconstructed with the aforementioned methods. To compare image quality of all the CT data, SNRs and CNRs for any nodule were calculated for all protocols. To compare nodule detection capability among all protocols, the probability of detection of any nodule was assessed with a 5-point visual scoring system. Then, ROC analyses were performed to compare nodule detection capability of Ag and Cu filters for each radiation dose data with the same method and of the three methods for any radiation dose data and obtained with either filter.

RESULTS

At any of the doses, SNR, CNR and area under the curve for the Ag filter were significantly higher or larger than those for the Cu filter (p < 0.05). Moreover, with DLR, those values were significantly higher or larger than all the others for CTs obtained with any of the radiation doses and either filter (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Ag filter and DLR can significantly improve image quality and nodule detection capability compared with the Cu filter and other reconstruction methods at each of radiation doses used.

Effect of cumulative radiation exposure from Coronary catheterization on lung cancer mortality

BACKGROUND

Coronary catheterization (CC) procedure inevitably exposes patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) to radiation, while cumulative radiation exposure may lead to higher risk of cancer.

METHODS

This multi-center, retrospective study was based on the CC procedure in Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt II cohort (CIN-II, NCT05050877) among five regional central tertiary teaching hospitals in China between 2007 and 2020. Patients without known cancer were stratified according to the times they received CC procedure. Baseline information from their last CC procedure was analyzed. Cox regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to assess the relationship between cumulative radiation exposure from CC procedures and cancer-specific, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

Of 136,495 hospitalized survivors without cancer at baseline (mean age: 62.3 ± 11.1 years, 30.9% female), 116,992 patients (85.7%) underwent CC procedure once, 15,184 patients (11.1%) on twice, and 4,319 patients (3.2%) underwent CC procedure more than three times. During the median follow-up of 4.7 years (IQR: 2.5 to 7.4), totally 18,656 patients (13.7%) died after discharge, of which 617 (0.5%) died of lung cancer. Compared with the patients who underwent CC procedure once, the risk of lung cancer mortality increased significantly with the increase of the number of CC procedure (CC 2 times vs. 1 time: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.78, P < 0.001; CC ≥ 3 times vs. 1 time: HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.13 to 2.39, P < 0.05). Similar results were observed in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, but not in other cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that substantial proportion of CVD patients are exposed to multiple high levels of low-dose ionizing radiation from CC procedure, which is associated with an increased risk of cancer mortality in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05050877; URL: http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; 21/09/2021.

Photon-counting computed tomography in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: an initial experience

PURPOSE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) accounts for a significant proportion of mortality and morbidity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this cross-sectional study is to evaluate the performance of novel photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) in the detection of pulmonary parenchymal involvement.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with RA without a previous definitive diagnosis of ILD underwent high-resolution (HR) (0.4 mm slice thickness) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) (0.2 mm slice thickness) PCDCT examination. The extent of interstitial abnormalities [ground-glass opacity (GGO), reticulation, bronchiectasis, and honeycombing] were scored in each lobe using a Likert-type scale. Total ILD scores were calculated as the sum of scores from all lobes.

RESULTS

Reticulation and bronchiectasis scores were higher in the UHR measurements taken compared with the HR protocol [median (quartile 1, quartile 3): 2 (0, 3.5) vs. 0 (0, 3), P < 0.001 and 2 (0, 2) vs. 0 (0, 2), P < 0.001, respectively]; however, GGO and honeycombing scores did not differ [2 (2, 4) vs. 2 (2, 4), P = 0.944 and 0 (0, 0) vs. 0 (0, 0), P = 0.641, respectively]. Total ILD scores from both HR and UHR scans showed a mild negative correlation in diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (HR: r = -0.297, P = 0.034; UHR: r = -0.294, P = 0.036). The pattern of lung parenchymal involvement did not differ significantly between the two protocols. The HR protocol had significantly lower volume CT dose index [0.67 (0.69, 1.06) mGy], total dose length product [29 (24.48, 33.2) mGy*cm] compared with UHR scans [8.18 (6.80, 9.23) mGy, P < 0.001 and 250 (218, 305) mGy*cm, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

UHR PCD-CT provides more detailed information on ILD in patients with RA than low-dose HR PCDCT. HR PCD-CT image acquisition with a low effective radiation dose may serve as a valuable, low-radiation screening tool in the selection of patients for further, higher-dose UHR PCD-CT screening.

Radiation Exposure to Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening: Should We Be Concerned?

Lung cancer screening (LCS) programs through low-dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) are being implemented in several countries worldwide. Radiation exposure of healthy individuals due to prolonged CT screening rounds and, eventually, the additional examinations required in case of suspicious findings may represent a concern, thus eventually reducing the participation in an LCS program. Therefore, the present review aims to assess the potential radiation risk from LDCT in this setting, providing estimates of cumulative dose and radiation-related risk in LCS in order to improve awareness for an informed and complete attendance to the program. After summarizing the results of the international trials on LCS to introduce the benefits coming from the implementation of a dedicated program, the screening-related and participant-related factors determining the radiation risk will be introduced and their burden assessed. Finally, future directions for a personalized screening program as well as technical improvements to reduce the delivered dose will be presented.

Radiation Dose Reduction Opportunities in Vascular Imaging

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been the gold standard imaging modality for vascular imaging due to a variety of factors, including the widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) scanners, the ease and speed of image acquisition, and the high sensitivity of CTA for vascular pathology. However, the radiation dose experienced by the patient during imaging has long been a concern of this image acquisition method. Advancements in CT image acquisition techniques in combination with advancements in non-ionizing radiation imaging techniques including magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) present growing opportunities to reduce total radiation dose to patients. This review provides an overview of advancements in imaging technology and acquisition techniques that are helping to minimize radiation dose associated with vascular imaging.

Low-Dose High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lung: Radiation Dose and Image Quality in the Clinical Routine

This study aims to investigate the qualitative and quantitative image quality of low-dose high-resolution (LD-HR) lung CT scans acquired with the first clinical approved photon counting CT (PCCT) scanner. Furthermore, the radiation dose used by the PCCT is compared to a conventional CT scanner with an energy-integrating detector system (EID-CT). Twenty-nine patients who underwent a LD-HR chest CT scan with dual-source PCCT and had previously undergone a LD-HR chest CT with a standard EID-CT scanner were retrospectively included in this study. Images of the whole lung as well as enlarged image sections displaying a specific finding (lesion) were evaluated in terms of overall image quality, image sharpness and image noise by three senior radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale. The PCCT images were reconstructed with and without a quantum iterative reconstruction algorithm (PCCT QIR+/−). Noise and signal-to-noise (SNR) were measured and the effective radiation dose was calculated. Overall, image quality and image sharpness were rated best in PCCT (QIR+) images. A significant difference was seen particularly in image sections of PCCT (QIR+) images compared to EID-CT images (p < 0.005). Image noise of PCCT (QIR+) images was significantly lower compared to EID-CT images in image sections (p = 0.005). In contrast, noise was lowest on EID-CT images (p < 0.001). The PCCT used significantly less radiation dose compared to the EID-CT (p < 0.001). In conclusion, LD-HR PCCT scans of the lung provide better image quality while using significantly less radiation dose compared to EID-CT scans.

Comparison of Application Value of Different Radiation Dose Evaluation Methods in Evaluating Radiation Dose of Adult Thoracic and Abdominal CT Scan

Objective

To explore the differences among volumetric CT dose index (CTDI_vol), body-specific dose assessment (SSDE_ED) based on effective diameter (ED), and SSDE_WED based on water equivalent diameter (WED) in evaluating the radiation dose of adult thoracic and abdominal CT scanning.

Methods

From January 2021 to October 2021, enhanced chest CT scans of 100 patients and enhanced abdomen CT scans of another 100 patients were collected. According to the body mass index (BMI), they can be divided into groups A and D (BMI < 20 kg/m²), groups B and E (20 kg/m² ≤ BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m²), and groups C and F (BMI > 24.9 kg/m²). The CTDIvol, anteroposterior diameter (AP), and the left and rght diameter (LAT) of all the patients were recorded, and the ED, water equivalent diameter (WED), the conversion factor (f _size,ED), (f _{size, WED}), SSDE_ED, and SSDE_WED were calculated. The differences were compared between the different groups.

Results

The AP, LAT, ED, and WED of groups B, E, C, and F were higher than those of groups A and D, and those of groups C and F were higher than those of groups B and E (P < 0.05). The f _size,ED and f _{size, WED} of groups B, E, C, and F are lower than those of groups A and D, and those of groups C and F are lower than those of groups B and E (P < 0.05). CTDI_vol, SSDE_ED, and SSDE_WED in groups B, E, C, and F are higher than those in groups A and D, and those in groups C and F are higher than those in groups B and E (p < 0.05). In the same group, patients with chest- and abdomen-enhanced have higher SSDE_WED and SSDE_ED than CTDI_vol, patients with chest-enhanced CT scans have higher SSDE_WED than SSDE_ED, and patients with abdomen-enhanced CT scans have higher SSDE_ED than SSDE_WED (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CTDIvol and ED-based SSDEED underestimated the radiation dose of the subject exposed, where the patient was actually exposed to a greater dose. However, SSDE_WED based on WED considers better the difference in patient size and attenuation characteristics, and can more accurately evaluate the radiation dose received by patients of different sizes during the chest and abdomen CT scan.

Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Low-Dose Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT of the Lung

The aim of this study was to characterize image quality and to determine the optimal strength levels of a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm (quantum iterative reconstruction, QIR) for low-dose, ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) of the lung. Images were acquired on a clinical dual-source PCD-CT in the UHR mode and reconstructed with a sharp lung reconstruction kernel at different strength levels of QIR (QIR-1 to QIR-4) and without QIR (QIR-off). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and target transfer function (TTF) were analyzed in a cylindrical phantom. 52 consecutive patients referred for low-dose UHR chest PCD-CT were included (CTDIvol: 1 ± 0.6 mGy). Quantitative image quality analysis was performed computationally which included the calculation of the global noise index (GNI) and the global signal-to-noise ratio index (GSNRI). The mean attenuation of the lung parenchyma was measured. Two readers graded images qualitatively in terms of overall image quality, image sharpness, and subjective image noise using 5-point Likert scales. In the phantom, an increase in the QIR level slightly decreased spatial resolution and considerably decreased noise amplitude without affecting the frequency content. In patients, GNI decreased from QIR-off (202 ± 34 HU) to QIR-4 (106 ± 18 HU) (p < 0.001) by 48%. GSNRI increased from QIR-off (4.4 ± 0.8) to QIR-4 (8.2 ± 1.6) (p < 0.001) by 87%. Attenuation of lung parenchyma was highly comparable among reconstructions (QIR-off: -849 ± 53 HU to QIR-4: -853 ± 52 HU, p < 0.001). Subjective noise was best in QIR-4 (p < 0.001), while QIR-3 was best for sharpness and overall image quality (p < 0.001). Thus, our phantom and patient study indicates that QIR-3 provides the optimal iterative reconstruction level for low-dose, UHR PCD-CT of the lungs.

Image quality and pulmonary nodule detectability at low-dose computed tomography (low kVp and mAs): A phantom study

Background:

Nowadays, there has been a growing demand for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) protocols. CT has a critical role in the management of the diagnosis chain of pulmonary disease, especially in lung cancer screening. There have been introduced several dose reduction methods, however, most of them are time-consuming, intricate, and vendor-based strategies that are hardly used in clinics routinely. This study aims to evaluate the image quality and pulmonary nodule detectability of LDCT protocols that are feasible and easy implemented. Image quality was analyzed in a general quality control phantom (Gammex) and then in a manmade lung phantom with nodules-equivalent objects.

Methods:

This study was designed in a two steps, in the first step, a feasible low-dose lung CT protocol was selected with quality assessment of accreditation phantom image. In the second step, the selected low-dose protocol with an appropriate image quality was performed on a manmade lung phantom in which there were objects equivalent to the pulmonary nodule. Finally, image quality parameters of the phantom at the appropriate scan protocol were compared with the standard protocol.

Results:

A reduction of about 17% of kVp and 46% in tube current leads to dose reduction by about 70%. The contrast-to-noise ratio in the low-dose protocol remained almost unchanged. The signal-to-noise ratio in the low-dose protocol decreased by approximately 32%, and the noise level has increased by about 1.5 times. However, this reduction method hardly affected the detectability of nodules in man-made pulmonary phantom.

Conclusions:

Here, we demonstrated that the LDCT scan has an insignificant effect on the perception of lung nodules. In this study, patient dose in lung CT was reduced by modifying of kVp and mAs about approximately 70%. Hence, to step in toward low-dose strategies in medical imaging clinics, using easy-implemented and feasible low-dose strategies may be helpful.

Establishing scanning protocols for a CT lung cancer screening trial in the UK

OBJECTIVES

To develop a CT scanning protocol for lung cancer screening which achieved low radiation dose and a high level of objectively assessed image quality.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic chest phantom and a commercially available lung screening image quality phantom were scanned on a series of scan protocols from a previous UK lung screening pilot and on an alternative protocol. The chest phantom scans were used to assess the CT dose metrics on community-based mobile CT scanners and comparisons were made with published recommended doses. Scans of the image quality phantom were objectively assessed against the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) recommendations. Protocol adjustments were made to ensure that the recommended dose and image quality levels were both achieved.

RESULTS

The alternative scan protocol yielded doses up to 72% lower than on the previously used protocols with a CTDIvol of 0.6mGy for the 55 kg equivalent phantom and 1.3mGy with an additional 6 cm of tissue equivalent material in place. Scans on the existing protocols failed on two of the QIBA image quality metrics (edge enhancement and 3D resolution aspect ratio). Following adjustments to the reconstruction parameters of the resulting image quality met all six QIBA recommendations. Radiologist review of phantom images with this scan protocol deemed them suitable for a lung screening trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Scan protocols yielding low radiation doses and high levels of objectively assessed image quality which meet published criteria can be established through the use of specific anthropomorphic and image quality phantoms, and are deliverable in community-based lung cancer screening.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Development of a standard methodology for establishing CT lung screening scanning protocolsUse of QIBA recommendations as objective image quality metricsStandardised lung phantoms are essential tools for setting up lung screening protocols.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Kidney Stone CT: A Randomized, Facility-Based Intervention

OBJECTIVE

Kidney stones are common, tend to recur, and afflict a young population. Despite evidence and recommendations, adoption of reduced-radiation dose CT (RDCT) for kidney stone CT (KSCT) is slow. We sought to design and test an intervention to improve adoption of RDCT protocols for KSCT using a randomized facility-based intervention.

METHODS

Facilities contributing at least 40 KSCTs to the American College of Radiology dose index registry (DIR) during calendar year 2015 were randomized to intervention or control groups. The Dose Optimization for Stone Evaluation intervention included customized CME modules, personalized consultation, and protocol recommendations for RDCT. Dose length product (DLP) of all KSCTs was recorded at baseline (2015) and compared with 2017, 2018, and 2019. Change in mean DLP was compared between facilities that participated (intervened-on), facilities randomized to intervention that did not participate (intervened-off), and control facilities. Difference-in-difference between intervened-on and control facilities is reported before and after intervention.

RESULTS

Of 314 eligible facilities, 155 were randomized to intervention and 159 to control. There were 25 intervened-on facilities, 71 intervened-off facilities, and 96 control facilities. From 2015 to 2017, there was a drop of 110 mGy ∙ cm (a 16% reduction) in the mean DLP in the intervened-on group, which was significantly lower compared with the control group (P < .05). The proportion of RDCTs increased for each year in the intervened-on group relative to the other groups for all 3 years (P < .01).

DISCUSSION

The Dose Optimization for Stone Evaluation intervention resulted in a significant (P < .05) and persistent reduction in mean radiation doses for engaged facilities performing KSCTs.

Five-star rating system for acceptable quality and dose in CT

KEY POINTS

• Recent papers have shown examples of the methodology involved in integrating image quality with radiation dose and assessing acceptable quality dose (AQD).• As a further step in that direction, translating a 5-point score into a 5-star rating shall be helpful for wider and uniform application and shall be in line with the popular use of the 5-star rating.

The radiologist's role in lung cancer screening

Lung cancer is still the deadliest cancer in men and women worldwide. This high mortality is related to diagnosis in advanced stages, when curative treatment is no longer an option. Large randomized controlled trials have shown that lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (CT) can detect lung cancers at earlier stages and reduce lung cancer-specific mortality. The recent publication of the significant reduction of cancer-related mortality by 26% in the Dutch-Belgian NELSON LCS trial has increased the likelihood that implementation of LCS in Europe will move forward. Radiologists are important stakeholders in numerous aspects of the LCS pathway. Their role goes beyond nodule detection and nodule management. Being part of a multidisciplinary team, radiologists are key players in numerous aspects of implementation of a high quality LCS program. In this non-systematic review we discuss the multifaceted role of radiologists in LCS.

Latest CT technologies in lung cancer screening: protocols and radiation dose reduction

The aim of this review is to provide clinicians and technicians with an overview of the development of CT protocols in lung cancer screening. CT protocols have evolved from pre-fixed settings in early lung cancer screening studies starting in 2004 towards automatic optimized settings in current international guidelines. The acquisition protocols of large lung cancer screening studies and guidelines are summarized. Radiation dose may vary considerably between CT protocols, but has reduced gradually over the years. Ultra-low dose acquisition can be achieved by applying latest dose reduction techniques. The use of low tube current or tin-filter in combination with iterative reconstruction allow to reduce the radiation dose to a submilliSievert level. However, one should be cautious in reducing the radiation dose to ultra-low dose settings since performed studies lacked generalizability. Continuous efforts are made by international radiology organizations to streamline the CT data acquisition and image quality assurance and to keep track of new developments in CT lung cancer screening. Examples like computer-aided diagnosis and radiomic feature extraction are discussed and current limitations are outlined. Deep learning-based solutions in post-processing of CT images are provided. Finally, future perspectives and recommendations are provided for lung cancer screening CT protocols.