1
|
Gaines AG, Cagle JG. Associations Between Certificate of Need Policies and Hospice Quality Outcomes. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:471-478. [PMID: 37256687 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231180613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Certificate of need (CON) laws are state-based regulations requiring approval of new healthcare entities and capital expenditures. Varying by state, these regulations impact hospices in 14 states and DC, with several states re-examining provisions. AIM This cross-sectional study examined the association of CON status on hospice quality outcomes using the hospice item set metric (HIS). DESIGN Data from the February 2022 Medicare Hospice Provider and General Information reports of 4870 US hospices were used to compare group means of the 8 HIS measures across CON status. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict HIS outcomes by CON status while controlling for ownership and size. RESULTS Approximately 86% of hospices are in states without a hospice CON provision. The unadjusted mean HIS scores for all measures were higher in CON states (M range 94.40-99.59) than Non-CON (M range 90.50-99.53) with significant differences in all except treatment preferences. In the adjusted model, linear regression analyses showed hospice CON states had significantly higher HIS ratings than those from Non-CON states for beliefs and values addressed (β = .05, P = .009), pain assessment (β = .05, P = .009), dyspnea treatment (β = .08, P < .001) and the composite measure (β = .09, P < .001). Treatment preferences, pain screening, dyspnea screening, and opioid bowel treatment were not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION The study suggests that CON regulations may have a modest, but beneficial impact on hospice-reported quality outcomes, particularly for small and medium-sized hospices. Further research is needed to explore other factors that contribute to HIS outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlen G Gaines
- Doctoral Program in Palliative Care, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John G Cagle
- Department of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Braun RT, Unruh MA, Stevenson DG, Prigerson HG, Fernandez R, Yao LZ, Casalino LP. Changes in Diagnoses and Site of Care for Patients Receiving Hospice Care From Agencies Acquired by Private Equity Firms and Publicly Traded Companies. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2334582. [PMID: 37747735 PMCID: PMC10520742 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Private equity firms and publicly traded companies have been acquiring US hospice agencies; an estimated 16% of US hospice agencies are owned by private equity (PE) firms or publicly traded companies (PTC). Objective To examine the association of PE and PTC acquisitions of hospices with Medicare patients' site of care and clinical diagnoses. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of US hospice agencies used a novel national database of acquisitions merged with the Medicare Post-Acute Care and Hospice Public Use File for 2013 to 2020. Changes in sites of care and patient characteristics for hospice agencies acquired by PE or PTCs were compared with changes for patients in nonacquired for-profit hospice agencies. Exposure Private equity and publicly traded company acquisitions. Main Outcomes and Measures This study used a difference-in-differences approach within an event-study framework to examine the association of PE and PTC acquisitions of hospice agencies with changes in patient diagnoses and sites of care. Dependent variables were annual hospice-level measures of the Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) score and proportion of patients diagnosed with cancer or dementia. Sites of care included the proportion of patients receiving hospice care in their personal home, nursing home, or assisted living facility. Results A total of 158 hospice agencies acquired by PEs, 250 acquired by PTCs, and 1559 other for-profit hospice agencies were included. Preacquisition, hospice agencies that would later be acquired by PE or PTC served a mean (IQR) 30.1% (12.0%-44.0%) and 29.4% (13.0%-43.0%) of their patients in nursing homes respectively, a greater proportion compared with the 27.1% (8.0%-43.8%) served by for-profit hospices that were never acquired. Agencies acquired by PE between 2014 and 2019 saw a significant relative increase of 5.98% in dementia patients (1.38 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.35-2.40 percentage points; P = .008). In PTC-owned hospices, the proportion of patients receiving care at home increased by 5.26% (2.98 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.46-4.51 percentage points; P < .001), the proportion of dementia patients rose by 13.49% (3.11 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.14-4.09 percentage points; P < .001), and the HCC score decreased by 1.37% (-3.19 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.92 to -0.47 percentage points; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that PE and PTCs select patients and sites of care to maximize profits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Tyler Braun
- Division of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Mark A. Unruh
- Division of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - David G. Stevenson
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Holly G. Prigerson
- Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Rahul Fernandez
- Division of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Leah Z. Yao
- Division of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence P. Casalino
- Division of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anhang Price R, Parast L, Elliott MN, Tolpadi AA, Bradley MA, Schlang D, Teno JM. Association of Hospice Profit Status With Family Caregivers' Reported Care Experiences. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:311-318. [PMID: 36848095 PMCID: PMC9972244 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance Expansive growth in the US hospice market has been driven almost exclusively by an increase in for-profit hospices. Prior research found that, in contrast to not-for-profit hospices, for-profit hospices focus on delivering care to patients in nursing homes, provide fewer nursing visits, and use less skilled staff. However, prior studies have not reported on the associations of these differences in care patterns with hospice care quality. Patient- and family-centeredness is a core element of hospice care quality that is measured through surveys of care experiences. Objective To examine whether differences in profit status are associated with family caregivers' reports of hospice care experiences and assess factors that may be associated with observed differences in care experiences by profit status. Design, Setting, and Participants Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospice Survey data from 653 208 caregiver respondents, reflecting care received from 3107 hospices between April 2017 and March 2019, were used for a cross-sectional examination of hospice care experiences by profit status. Data analysis was performed from January 2020 to November 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were case-mix-adjusted and mode-adjusted top-box scores for 8 measures of hospice care experiences, including communication, timely care, symptom management, and emotional and religious support, as well as a summary score averaging across measures. Linear regression examined the association between profit status and hospice-level scores, adjusting for other organizational and structural hospice characteristics. Results There were 906 not-for-profit and 1761 for-profit hospices with mean (SD) time in operation of 25.7 (7.8) years and 13.8 (8.0) years, respectively. Mean (SD) decedent age at death was 82.8 (2.3) years, similar for not-for-profit and for-profit hospices. The mean proportion of patients who were Black, Hispanic, and White was 4.9%, 0.9%, and 91.4% for not-for-profit hospices and 9.0%, 2.2%, and 85.4% for for-profit hospices, respectively. Family caregivers reported worse care experiences at for-profit hospices than at not-for-profit hospices for all measures. Significant differences in average hospice performance by profit status remained after adjusting for hospice characteristics. However, for-profit hospice performance varied, with 548 of 1761 (31.1%) for-profit hospices scoring 3 or more points below the national hospice average of overall performance and 386 of 1761 (21.9%) scoring 3 or more points above the average. In contrast, only 113 of 906 (12.5%) not-for-profit hospices scored 3 or more points below the average, and 305 of 906 (33.7%) scored 3 or more points above the average. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of CAHPS Hospice Survey data, caregivers of patients receiving hospice care reported substantially worse care experiences in for-profit than in not-for-profit hospices; however, there was variation in reported experiences among both types of hospices. Public reporting of hospice quality is important.
Collapse
|
4
|
Franzosa E, Wyte-Lake T, Tsui EK, Reckrey JM, Sterling MR. Essential but Excluded: Building Disaster Preparedness Capacity for Home Health Care Workers and Home Care Agencies. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:1990-1996. [PMID: 36343702 PMCID: PMC9634621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 has demonstrated the essential role of home care services in supporting community-dwelling older and disabled individuals through a public health emergency. As the pandemic overwhelmed hospitals and nursing homes, home care helped individuals remain in the community and recover from COVID-19 at home. Yet unlike many institutional providers, home care agencies were often disconnected from broader public health disaster planning efforts and struggled to access basic resources, jeopardizing the workers who provide this care and the medically complex and often marginalized patients they support. The exclusion of home care from the broader COVID-19 emergency response underscores how the home care industry operates apart from the traditional health care infrastructure, even as its workers provide essential long-term care services. This special article (1) describes the experiences of home health care workers and their agencies during COVID-19 by summarizing existing empiric research; (2) reflects on how these experiences were shaped and exacerbated by longstanding challenges in the home care industry; and (3) identifies implications for future disaster preparedness policies and practice to better serve this workforce, the home care industry, and those for whom they care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Franzosa
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA,Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Address correspondence to Emily Franzosa DrPH, Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Tamar Wyte-Lake
- Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, CA, USA
| | - Emma K. Tsui
- Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer M. Reckrey
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harrison KL, Cenzer I, Ankuda CK, Hunt LJ, Aldridge MD. Hospice Improves Care Quality For Older Adults With Dementia In Their Last Month Of Life. HEALTH AFFAIRS (PROJECT HOPE) 2022; 41:821-830. [PMID: 35666964 PMCID: PMC9662595 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The Medicare hospice benefit was originally designed around a cancer disease paradigm but increasingly serves people living with dementia. At this time, almost half of all older adults receiving hospice care have dementia. Yet there is minimal evidence as to whether hospice benefits people living with dementia outside of nursing facilities. We asked whether and how the perceived quality of last-month-of-life care differed between people with and without dementia and whether hospice use among people living with dementia was associated with perceived quality of care compared with the quality of care for those who did not use hospice. We used nationally representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study and Medicare claims from the period 2011-17 to examine the impact of hospice enrollment on proxy perceptions of last-month-of-life care quality. Proxies of people living with dementia enrolled in hospice compared with proxies of those not enrolled more often reported care to be excellent (predicted probability: 52 percent versus 41 percent), more often reported having anxiety or sadness managed (67 percent versus 46 percent), and less often reported changes in care settings in the last three days of life (10 percent versus 25 percent). There were no differences in the impact of hospice on proxy ratings of care for people with and without dementia. Policy makers should consider these benefits when weighing changes to hospice policy and regulations that may affect people living with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Harrison
- Krista L. Harrison , University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Irena Cenzer
- Irena Cenzer, University of California San Francisco
| | - Claire K Ankuda
- Claire K. Ankuda, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Lauren J Hunt
- Lauren J. Hunt, University of California San Francisco
| | - Melissa D Aldridge
- Melissa D. Aldridge, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and James J. Peters Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reckrey JM, Ornstein KA, McKendrick K, Tsui EK, Morrison RS, Aldridge M. Receipt of Hospice Aide Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries Receiving Home Hospice Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:503-511. [PMID: 34954065 PMCID: PMC8930441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Hospice aides provide essential direct care to hospice patients, yet there is minimal research examining hospice aide visits. OBJECTIVES describe the prevalence and frequency of hospice aide visits, and 2) evaluate patient, community, and hospice characteristics associated with these visits. METHODS Longitudinal cohort study of Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) participants who died between 2010-2018 and received routine hospice care in the 6 months prior to death (n = 674). We characterized prevalence and frequency of hospice aide visits over time and used generalized linear modelling to identify factors associated with visits. RESULTS 64% of hospice enrollees received hospice aide visits and average visit frequency (1.3 per week) remained stable throughout enrollment. The only patient characteristic associated with receipt of hospice aide visits was primary hospice diagnosis (respiratory diagnosis vs. dementia: OR 0.372, P = 0.040). Those living in community-based residential housing and those cared for by hospices with aides employed as staff were more likely to receive any hospice aide visits (OR 2.331, P = 0.047 and OR 4.612, P = 0.002, respectively.) CONCLUSION: Hospice aide visits are a common component of hospice care, but visit frequency does not increase as death approaches. Receipt of hospice aide visits was primarily associated with community and hospice agency (rather than patient) characteristics. Future work is needed to ensure that hospice aides are integrated in the hospice interdisciplinary team and that access to hospice aide visits is meaningfully driven by patient and family needs, rather than the practice norms and business models of individual hospice agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Reckrey
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York.
| | - Katherine A Ornstein
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York
| | - Karen McKendrick
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York
| | - Emma K Tsui
- CUNY Graduate School of Health and Health Policy (E.K..T.), New York, New York
| | - R Sean Morrison
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York; James J. Peters VA Medical Center (R.S.M., M.A.), Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Melissa Aldridge
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (J.M.R., K.A.O., K.M., R.S.M., M.A.), New York, New York; James J. Peters VA Medical Center (R.S.M., M.A.), Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Diane E Meier
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Claire K Ankuda
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - R Sean Morrison
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- James J. Peters Bronx VA Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa D Aldridge
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- James J. Peters Bronx VA Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|