1
|
Moore A, Karadag P, Fisher E, Crombez G, Straube S, Eccleston C. Narrative bias ("spin") is common in randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids for pain. Pain 2024; 165:1380-1390. [PMID: 38227560 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We define narrative bias as a tendency to interpret information as part of a larger story or pattern, regardless of whether the facts support the full narrative. Narrative bias in title and abstract means that results reported in the title and abstract of an article are done so in a way that could distort their interpretation and mislead readers who had not read the whole article. Narrative bias is often referred to as "spin." It is prevalent in abstracts of scientific papers and is impactful because abstracts are often the only part of an article read. We found no extant narrative bias instrument suitable for exploring both efficacy and safety statements in randomized trials and systematic reviews of pain. We constructed a 6-point instrument with clear instructions and tested it on randomised trials and systematic reviews of cannabinoids and cannabis-based medicines for pain, with updated searches to April 2021. The instrument detected moderate or severe narrative bias in the title and abstract of 24% (8 of 34) of randomised controlled trials and 17% (11 of 64) of systematic reviews; narrative bias for efficacy and safety occurred equally. There was no significant or meaningful association between narrative bias and study characteristics in correlation or cluster analyses. Bias was always in favour of the experimental cannabinoid or cannabis-based medicine. Put simply, reading title and abstract only could give an incorrect impression of efficacy or safety in about 1 in 5 papers reporting on these products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Moore
- Court Road, Newton Ferrers, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Paige Karadag
- Department of Psychology at the University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom
- School of Health, Science and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, College Road, University Quarter, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sebastian Straube
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Psychology, The University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Aquino JP, Sloan ME, Nunes JC, Costa GPA, Katz JL, de Oliveira D, Ra J, Tang VM, Petrakis IL. Alcohol Use Disorder and Chronic Pain: An Overlooked Epidemic. Am J Psychiatry 2024; 181:391-402. [PMID: 38706339 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and chronic pain disorders are pervasive, multifaceted medical conditions that often co-occur. However, their comorbidity is often overlooked, despite its prevalence and clinical relevance. Individuals with AUD are more likely to experience chronic pain than the general population. Conversely, individuals with chronic pain commonly alleviate their pain with alcohol, which may escalate into AUD. This narrative review discusses the intricate relationship between AUD and chronic pain. Based on the literature available, the authors present a theoretical model explaining the reciprocal relationship between AUD and chronic pain across alcohol intoxication and withdrawal. They propose that the use of alcohol for analgesia rapidly gives way to acute tolerance, triggering the need for higher levels of alcohol consumption. Attempts at abstinence lead to alcohol withdrawal syndrome and hyperalgesia, increasing the risk of relapse. Chronic neurobiological changes lead to preoccupation with pain and cravings for alcohol, further entrenching both conditions. To stimulate research in this area, the authors review methodologies to improve the assessment of pain in AUD studies, including self-report and psychophysical methods. Further, they discuss pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies that may target both conditions, potentially improving both AUD and chronic pain outcomes simultaneously. Finally, the authors emphasize the need to manage both conditions concurrently, and encourage both the scientific community and clinicians to ensure that these intertwined conditions are not overlooked given their clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao P De Aquino
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Matthew E Sloan
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Julio C Nunes
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Gabriel P A Costa
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Jasmin L Katz
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Debora de Oliveira
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Jocelyn Ra
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Victor M Tang
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| | - Ismene L Petrakis
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (DeAquino, Nunes, Ra, Petrakis); Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Ra); VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Conn. (De Aquino, Petrakis); Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Katz, Tang); Division of Neurosciences and Clinical Translation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto (Sloan); Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto (Sloan); Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan); Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto (Sloan); Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (Sloan, Tang); Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto (Sloan, Tang); University of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (Costa); St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (De Oliveira)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ladakis DC, Pedrini E, Reyes-Mantilla MI, Sanjayan M, Smith MD, Fitzgerald KC, Pardo CA, Reich DS, Absinta M, Bhargava P. Metabolomics of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Demonstrates Lipid Changes Linked to Alterations in Transcriptomics-Based Cellular Profiles. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2024; 11:e200219. [PMID: 38547430 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000200219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a dysregulated circulating metabolome, but the metabolome of MS brain lesions has not been studied. The aims of this study were to identify differences in the brain tissue metabolome in MS compared with controls and to assess its association with the cellular profile of corresponding tissue. METHODS MS tissues included samples from the edge and core of chronic active or inactive lesions and periplaque white matter (WM). Control specimens were obtained from normal WM. Metabolomic analysis was performed using mass-spectrometry coupled with liquid/gas chromatography and subsequently integrated with single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data by correlating metabolite abundances with relative cell counts, as well as individual genes using Multiomics Factor Analysis (MOFA). RESULTS Seventeen samples from 5 people with secondary progressive MS and 8 samples from 6 controls underwent metabolomic profiling identifying 783 metabolites. MS lesions had higher levels of sphingosines (false discovery rate-adjusted p-value[q] = 2.88E-05) and sphingomyelins and ceramides (q = 2.15E-07), but lower nucleotide (q = 0.05), energy (q = 0.001), lysophospholipid (q = 1.86E-07), and monoacylglycerol (q = 0.04) metabolite levels compared with control WM. Periplaque WM had elevated sphingomyelins and ceramides (q = 0.05) and decreased energy metabolites (q = 0.01) and lysophospholipids (q = 0.05) compared with control WM. Sphingolipids and membrane lipid metabolites were positively correlated with astrocyte and immune cell abundances and negatively correlated with oligodendrocytes. On the other hand, long-chain fatty acid, endocannabinoid, and monoacylglycerol pathways were negatively correlated with astrocyte and immune cell populations and positively correlated with oligodendrocytes. MOFA demonstrated associations between differentially expressed metabolites and genes involved in myelination and lipid biosynthesis. DISCUSSION MS lesions and perilesional WM demonstrated a significantly altered metabolome compared with control WM. Many of the altered metabolites were associated with altered cellular composition and gene expression, indicating an important role of lipid metabolism in chronic neuroinflammation in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios C Ladakis
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Edoardo Pedrini
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Maria I Reyes-Mantilla
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Muraleetharan Sanjayan
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Matthew D Smith
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Kathryn C Fitzgerald
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Carlos A Pardo
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Daniel S Reich
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Martina Absinta
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Pavan Bhargava
- From the Department of Neurology (D.C.L., M.I.R.-M., M.S., M.D.S., K.C.F., C.A.P., D.S.R., M.A., P.B.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuropathology Unit (E.P., M.A.), Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy and Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernández Ó, Sörensen PS, Comi G, Vermersch P, Hartung HP, Leocani L, Berger T, Van Wijmeersch B, Oreja-Guevara C. Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1379538. [PMID: 38646534 PMCID: PMC11032020 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1379538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) management in individuals aged 55 and above presents unique challenges due to the complex interaction between aging, comorbidities, immunosenescence, and MS pathophysiology. This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of MS in older adults, including the increased incidence and prevalence of MS in this age group, the shift in disease phenotypes from relapsing-remitting to progressive forms, and the presence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. We aim to provide an updated review of the available evidence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in older patients, including the efficacy and safety of existing therapies, emerging treatments such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTKs) inhibitors and those targeting remyelination and neuroprotection, and the critical decisions surrounding the initiation, de-escalation, and discontinuation of DMTs. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including physical therapy, neuromodulation therapies, cognitive rehabilitation, and psychotherapy, are also examined for their role in holistic care. The importance of MS Care Units and advance care planning are explored as a cornerstone in providing patient-centric care, ensuring alignment with patient preferences in the disease trajectory. Finally, the review emphasizes the need for personalized management and continuous monitoring of MS patients, alongside advocating for inclusive study designs in clinical research to improve the management of this growing patient demographic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Óscar Fernández
- Departament of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine; Institute of Biomedical Research of Malaga (IBIMA), Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Department of Pharmacology and Pediatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Per Soelberg Sörensen
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Centre Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrick Vermersch
- Univ. Lille, Inserm U1172 LilNCog, CHU Lille, FHU Precise, Lille, France
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Centre Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bart Van Wijmeersch
- University MS Centre, Hasselt-Pelt, Belgium
- Rehabilitation and Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Noorderhart Hospitals, Pelt, Belgium
| | - Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hidding U, Mainka T, Buhmann C. Therapeutic use of medical Cannabis in neurological diseases: a clinical update. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2024; 131:117-126. [PMID: 38015317 PMCID: PMC10791790 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02719-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The use of medical Cannabis has increased in recent years due to changing legal circumstances in many countries. Approval exists only for a few neurological conditions such as rare forms of epilepsy or spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Beyond that, however, medical Cannabis is used for a wide range of neurological conditions and symptoms. In Germany, in parallel with new legislation that has simplified the prescription of medical Cannabis, an accompanying survey has been implemented for which initial data are now available. In this context, our review provides an overview of the evidence for the therapeutic use of medical Cannabis in neurology, the potential benefits, and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Hidding
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tina Mainka
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology at the Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Buhmann
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Siriratnam P, Huda S, Butzkueven H, van der Walt A, Jokubaitis V, Monif M. A comprehensive review of the advances in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Autoimmun Rev 2023; 22:103465. [PMID: 37852514 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare relapsing neuroinflammatory autoimmune astrocytopathy, with a predilection for the optic nerves and spinal cord. Most cases are characterised by aquaporin-4-antibody positivity and have a relapsing disease course, which is associated with accrual of disability. Although the prognosis in NMOSD has improved markedly over the past few years owing to advances in diagnosis and therapeutics, it remains a severe disease. In this article, we review the evolution of our understanding of NMOSD, its pathogenesis, clinical features, disease course, treatment options and associated symptoms. We also address the gaps in knowledge and areas for future research focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pakeeran Siriratnam
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Saif Huda
- Department of Neurology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anneke van der Walt
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vilija Jokubaitis
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mastura Monif
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Solmi M, De Toffol M, Kim JY, Choi MJ, Stubbs B, Thompson T, Firth J, Miola A, Croatto G, Baggio F, Michelon S, Ballan L, Gerdle B, Monaco F, Simonato P, Scocco P, Ricca V, Castellini G, Fornaro M, Murru A, Vieta E, Fusar-Poli P, Barbui C, Ioannidis JPA, Carvalho AF, Radua J, Correll CU, Cortese S, Murray RM, Castle D, Shin JI, Dragioti E. Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ 2023; 382:e072348. [PMID: 37648266 PMCID: PMC10466434 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically assess credibility and certainty of associations between cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis based medicines and human health, from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN Umbrella review. DATA SOURCES PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, up to 9 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs that have reported on the efficacy and safety of cannabis, cannabinoids, or cannabis based medicines were included. Credibility was graded according to convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant (observational evidence), and by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (RCTs). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS 101 meta-analyses were included (observational=50, RCTs=51) (AMSTAR 2 high 33, moderate 31, low 32, or critically low 5). From RCTs supported by high to moderate certainty, cannabis based medicines increased adverse events related to the central nervous system (equivalent odds ratio 2.84 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 3.73)), psychological effects (3.07 (1.79 to 5.26)), and vision (3.00 (1.79 to 5.03)) in people with mixed conditions (GRADE=high), improved nausea/vomit, pain, spasticity, but increased psychiatric, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence among others (GRADE=moderate). Cannabidiol improved 50% reduction of seizures (0.59 (0.38 to 0.92)) and seizure events (0.59 (0.36 to 0.96)) (GRADE=high), but increased pneumonia, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For chronic pain, cannabis based medicines or cannabinoids reduced pain by 30% (0.59 (0.37 to 0.93), GRADE=high), across different conditions (n=7), but increased psychological distress. For epilepsy, cannabidiol increased risk of diarrhoea (2.25 (1.33 to 3.81)), had no effect on sleep disruption (GRADE=high), reduced seizures across different populations and measures (n=7), improved global impression (n=2), quality of life, and increased risk of somnolence (GRADE=moderate). In the general population, cannabis worsened positive psychotic symptoms (5.21 (3.36 to 8.01)) and total psychiatric symptoms (7.49 (5.31 to 10.42)) (GRADE=high), negative psychotic symptoms, and cognition (n=11) (GRADE=moderate). In healthy people, cannabinoids improved pain threshold (0.74 (0.59 to 0.91)), unpleasantness (0.60 (0.41 to 0.88)) (GRADE=high). For inflammatory bowel disease, cannabinoids improved quality of life (0.34 (0.22 to 0.53) (GRADE=high). For multiple sclerosis, cannabinoids improved spasticity, pain, but increased risk of dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For cancer, cannabinoids improved sleep disruption, but had gastrointestinal adverse events (n=2) (GRADE=moderate). Cannabis based medicines, cannabis, and cannabinoids resulted in poor tolerability across various conditions (GRADE=moderate). Evidence was convincing from observational studies (main and sensitivity analyses) in pregnant women, small for gestational age (1.61 (1.41 to 1.83)), low birth weight (1.43 (1.27 to 1.62)); in drivers, car crash (1.27 (1.21 to 1.34)); and in the general population, psychosis (1.71 (1.47 to 2.00)). Harmful effects were noted for additional neonatal outcomes, outcomes related to car crash, outcomes in the general population including psychotic symptoms, suicide attempt, depression, and mania, and impaired cognition in healthy cannabis users (all suggestive to highly suggestive). CONCLUSIONS Convincing or converging evidence supports avoidance of cannabis during adolescence and early adulthood, in people prone to or with mental health disorders, in pregnancy and before and while driving. Cannabidiol is effective in people with epilepsy. Cannabis based medicines are effective in people with multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, inflammatory bowel disease, and in palliative medicine but not without adverse events. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018093045. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Solmi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ontario, ON, Canada
- On Track: The Champlain First Episode Psychosis Program, Department of Mental Health, The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical detection Lab, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health-Developmental Lab, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, and NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marco De Toffol
- Psychiatry Unit, Veris Delli Ponti Scorrano Hospital, Department of Mental Health, ASL Lecce, Lecce, Italy
| | - Jong Yeob Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Je Choi
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Trevor Thompson
- Centre of Chronic Illness and Ageing, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Joseph Firth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Alessandro Miola
- Neurosciences Department, Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Croatto
- Mental Health Department, AULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, Venice, Italy
| | - Francesca Baggio
- Mental Health Department, AULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, Venice, Italy
| | - Silvia Michelon
- Department of Mental Health, AULSS 7 Pedemontana Veneto, Italy
| | - Luca Ballan
- Department of Mental Health, AULSS 7 Pedemontana Veneto, Italy
| | - Björn Gerdle
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Francesco Monaco
- Department of Mental Health, Asl Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- European Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Simonato
- Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Paolo Scocco
- Mental Health Department, ULSS 6 Euganea, Padova, Italy
| | - Valdo Ricca
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Castellini
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Fornaro
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, University School of Medicine Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Murru
- Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Paolo Fusar-Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical detection Lab, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- Departments of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrè F Carvalho
- IMPACT - The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Joaquim Radua
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, CIBERSAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Samuele Cortese
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health-Developmental Lab, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, and NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences (Central Nervous System and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York City, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robin M Murray
- Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK
| | - David Castle
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, Australia
- Co-Director, Centre for Mental Health Service Innovation, Department of Health, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Jae Il Shin
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Severance Underwood Meta-research Center, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Research Laboratory Psychology of Patients, Families and Health Professionals, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernández N, Cappello MG, Quiroga PN. An assessment of qualitative and quantitative cannabinoids analysis in selected commercially available cannabis oils in Argentina. Forensic Sci Int 2023; 349:111762. [PMID: 37392612 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, the therapeutic use of cannabis products, especially cannabis oils, has increased significantly, due to the pharmacological potential of their cannabinoids, for the treatment of conditions, such as pain management, cancer, and epilepsy. In Argentina, patients with medical prescriptions can access to cannabis oil, through self-cultivation, a third-person (grower or importer), or a civil organization authorized for that purpose. However, these products remain largely unregulated in Argentina, and information available regarding labeling accuracy, especially cannabidiol (CBD)/ Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) concentrations are inconsistent or nonexistent, nor long-term product stability, and lot to lot variability. Understanding these properties is fundamental if these products are to be used in patients with a determinate pathology. Therefore, we analyzed commercially available cannabis oils (n: 500) in Argentina for qualitative and quantitative cannabinoids content. In order to provide a detailed overview of their cannabinoids profiles, and determine Δ9-THC, CBD, and cannabinol (CBN) concentrations, samples were diluted and analyzed by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Most of the samples tested positive for cannabinoids (n: 469) with Δ9-THC and CBD as the predominant cannabinoids. Among products tested, only 29.8% (n: 149) gave specific CBD label claims, and testing indicated a CBD tested positive of 70.5% (n: 105). For products (n: 17) with a THC-free label claim, testing indicated 76.5% (n: 13) of Δ9-THC positive, and cannabinoids were not detected in four products. Δ9-THC concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 143.0 mg/mL, CBD concentrations from 0.1 to 125.3 mg/mL, and CBN concentrations from 0.04 to 60.10 mg/mL; CBN/ Δ9-THC ratios ranged from 0.0012 to 2.31, and CBD/ Δ9-THC ratios from 0.0008 to 178.87. Furthermore, the (Δ9-THC + CBN)/CBD ratio of most samples was greater than one. In summary, our results indicate that cannabis oil products show wide variability in cannabinoids content, purity, and labeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolás Fernández
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Toxicología y Química Legal, Laboratorio de Asesoramiento Toxicológico Analítico (CENATOXA), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Marcello Gian Cappello
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Toxicología y Química Legal, Laboratorio de Asesoramiento Toxicológico Analítico (CENATOXA), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Patricia Noemí Quiroga
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Toxicología y Química Legal, Laboratorio de Asesoramiento Toxicológico Analítico (CENATOXA), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Therapeutic Potential of the Endocannabinoid System in Age-Related Diseases. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102492. [PMID: 36289755 PMCID: PMC9599275 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The endocannabinoid system (ECS) dynamically regulates many aspects of mammalian physiology. ECS has gained substantial interest since growing evidence suggests that it also plays a major role in several pathophysiological conditions due to its ability to modulate various underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, cannabinoids, as components of the cannabinoid system (CS), have proven beneficial effects such as anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, neuromodulatory, antioxidative, and cardioprotective effects. In this comprehensive review, we aimed to describe the complex interaction between CS and most common age-related diseases such as neuro-degenerative, oncological, skeletal, and cardiovascular disorders, together with the potential of various cannabinoids to ameliorate the progression of these disorders. Since chronic inflammation is postulated as the pillar of all the above-mentioned medical conditions, we also discuss in this paper the potential of CS to ameliorate aging-associated immune system dysregulation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Andersson KE. Emerging drugs for the treatment of bladder storage dysfunction. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2022; 27:277-287. [PMID: 35975727 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2022.2113057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current drug treatment of lower urinary tract disorders, for example, overactive bladder syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia, is moderately effective, has a low treatment persistence and some short- and long-term adverse events. Even if combination therapy with approved drugs may offer advantages in some patients, there is still a need for new agents. AREAS COVERED New b3-adrenoceptor agonists, antimuscarinics, the naked Maxi-K channel gene, a novel 5HT/NA reuptake inhibitor and soluble guanylate cyclase activators are discussed. Focus is given to P2X3 receptor antagonists, small molecule blockers of TRP channels, the roles of cannabis on incontinence in patients with multiple sclerosis, and of drugs acting directly on CB1 and CB2 receptor or indirectly via endocannabinoids by inhibition of fatty acid aminohydrolase. EXPERT OPINION New potential alternatives to currently used drugs/drug principles are emerging, but further clinical testing is required before they can be evaluated as therapeutic alternatives. It seems that for the near future individualized treatment with approved drugs and their combinations will be the prevailing therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Erik Andersson
- Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Henson JD, Vitetta L, Hall S. Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol medicines for chronic pain and mental health conditions. Inflammopharmacology 2022; 30:1167-1178. [PMID: 35796920 PMCID: PMC9294022 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-022-01020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Combination tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/cannabidiol (CBD) medicines or CBD-only medicines are prospective treatments for chronic pain, stress, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. THC and CBD increase signaling from cannabinoid receptors, which reduces synaptic transmission in parts of the central and peripheral nervous systems and reduces the secretion of inflammatory factors from immune and glial cells. The overall effect of adding CBD to THC medicines is to enhance the analgesic effect but counteract some of the adverse effects. There is substantial evidence for the effectiveness of THC/CBD combination medicines for chronic pain, especially neuropathic and nociplastic pain or pain with an inflammatory component. For CBD-only medication, there is substantial evidence for stress, moderate evidence for anxiety and insomnia, and minimal evidence for depression and pain. THC/CBD combination medicines have a good tolerability and safety profile relative to opioid analgesics and have negligible dependence and abuse potential; however, should be avoided in patients predisposed to depression, psychosis and suicide as these conditions appear to be exacerbated. Non-serious adverse events are usually dose-proportional, subject to tachyphylaxis and are rarely dose limiting when patients are commenced on a low dose with gradual up-titration. THC and CBD inhibit several Phase I and II metabolism enzymes, which increases the exposure to a wide range of drugs and appropriate care needs to be taken. Low-dose CBD that appears effective for chronic pain and mental health has good tolerability and safety, with few adverse effects and is appropriate as an initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy D Henson
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. .,Medlab Clinical Ltd, Sydney, NSW, 2015, Australia.
| | - Luis Vitetta
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Sean Hall
- Medlab Clinical Ltd, Sydney, NSW, 2015, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jaiswal V, Mukherjee D, Batra N, Ruchika FNU, Susheela AT, Chia JE, Mukherjee D, Naz S, Victor AA, Pokhrel NB, Song D, Seen T, Almas T, Saleh MA, Bansrao AS, Mansoor E. Acute pancreatitis as a rare adverse event among cannabis users: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29822. [PMID: 35777067 PMCID: PMC9239618 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use has been steadily rising in the United States and can have multiple adverse effects, including cannabis-induced acute pancreatitis. This study aims to collate and highlight the significant demographics, clinical presentation, and outcomes in patients with cannabis-induced acute pancreatitis. METHOD A systematic literature search of electronic databases for peer-reviewed articles was conducted. After an initial search, we found 792 articles through different electronic databases. After manually removing duplicates and articles that did not meet the criteria, 25 articles were included in our review. RESULTS A total of 45 patients were studied, 35 (78%) cases were male and 10 (22%) cases were female, showing male predominance. The mean age of all participants was 29.2 ± 10.3 years. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain 21 of 21 (100%), nausea 17 of 21 (81%), and vomiting 12 of 20 (60%). Ultrasound was normal in the majority of patients, with findings of mild pancreatitis. Computerized tomography scans revealed pancreatic edema and inflammation in 7 of 20 (35%) patients, and findings of necrotizing pancreatitis and complex fluid collection were visualized in 3 of 20 (15%) patients. Dilatation of intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary ducts was not seen in any patients. The overall prognosis was good, with reported full recovery. CONCLUSIONS Cannabis should be included in the differential diagnosis for the etiology of acute pancreatitis, which would help in early intervention and treatment for the mitigation of the rapidly progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikash Jaiswal
- Department of Medicine, AMA School of Medicine, Makati, Philippines
| | | | - Nitya Batra
- Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - FNU Ruchika
- Department of Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
| | - Ammu Thampi Susheela
- Department of Internal Medicine, Loyola MacNeal Hospital, Illinios, United States
| | - Jia Ee Chia
- International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Deblina Mukherjee
- Department of Medicine, St. George’s University School of Medicine, United States
| | - Sidra Naz
- Department of Medicine, BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | | | - Nishan Babu Pokhrel
- Department of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - David Song
- Department of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Tasur Seen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Talal Almas
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Emad Mansoor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Birke R, Meister S, Winkelmann A, Hinz B, Walther UI. Correlation of Nabiximols Dose to Steady-State Concentrations of Cannabinoids in Urine Samples from Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133717. [PMID: 35807001 PMCID: PMC9267351 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) is based on a complex procedure and is therefore not possible in most laboratories, especially in emergency cases. This work addresses the question of whether therapeutic drug monitoring of nabiximols can be performed using an immunological urine-based test system for cannabinoid abuse. Seventeen patients with multiple sclerosis were included in this study. Administered doses of nabiximols were correlated with immunologically determined urine concentrations of cannabinoids using the DRITM Cannabinoid (THC) Assay. Significant correlations with the administered nabiximols doses were found for creatinine-normalized urine concentrations of cannabinoids without (r = 0.675; p = 0.0015) and after (r = 0.650; p = 0.0044) hydrolysis, as well as for gas-chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry (GC/MS)-measured concentrations of the THC metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-THC (THC-COOH) in urine samples (r = 0.571; p = 0.0084) by Pearson’s correlation. In addition, doses were significantly correlated with plasma THC-COOH concentrations (r = 0.667; p = 0.0017) measured by GC/MS. Simple immunological cannabinoid measurements in urine samples could provide an estimate of nabiximols dosage, although the correlations obtained here were weak because of the small number of patients observed. Longitudinal monitoring of individual patients is expected to exhibit good results of therapeutic drug monitoring of nabiximols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rüdiger Birke
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (R.B.); (B.H.)
| | - Stefanie Meister
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18147 Rostock, Germany; (S.M.); (A.W.)
| | - Alexander Winkelmann
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18147 Rostock, Germany; (S.M.); (A.W.)
| | - Burkhard Hinz
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (R.B.); (B.H.)
| | - Udo I. Walther
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (R.B.); (B.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-381-494-5786
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vila Silván C, Vaney C, Dykukha I. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of cannabinoid products in chronic pain conditions and for symptoms associated with multiple sclerosis: what do they tell us? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:415-431. [PMID: 35679523 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2088501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : To investigate whether published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials provide sufficient clarity to inform prescribing of cannabinoid products aimed for medicinal use, we examined their features and findings in two well-researched areas: chronic cancer/noncancer pain and multiple sclerosis (MS)-related symptoms. AREAS COVERED : Structured searches from January 2011 to 2 February 2021 identified 31 systematic reviews (with/without meta-analyses) that met the inclusion criteria. Support for the efficacy of cannabinoids was minimal in cancer pain, and somewhat stronger in noncancer (especially neuropathic) pain and MS spasticity. All systematic reviews and most meta-analyses grouped cannabinoid products together without appropriate consideration of their differential attributes (active constituent(s), concentration/strength, dosage forms, administration route), dosing regimens or treatment durations. Patient populations and efficacy outcome measures were inhomogeneous, particularly for studies in noncancer pain and MS. Separate results for specific cannabinoid formulations were rarely provided. EXPERT OPINION : The therapeutic effect of cannabinoids, as already demonstrated for some products, is not reflected clearly in the current range of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in chronic pain and MS. To truly inform evidence-based practice, future publications should aim to present results by individual product from well-conducted clinical trials using appropriate and homogeneous outcome measures in well-defined patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claude Vaney
- Médecin-Adjoint, Clinique de Réhabilitation, HFR Meyriez-Murten, Meyriez, Switzerland
| | - Igor Dykukha
- Medical Affairs, Almirall Hermal GmbH, Scholtzstrasse 3, Reinbek, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Filippini G, Minozzi S, Borrelli F, Cinquini M, Dwan K. Cannabis and cannabinoids for symptomatic treatment for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 5:CD013444. [PMID: 35510826 PMCID: PMC9069991 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013444.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spasticity and chronic neuropathic pain are common and serious symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). These symptoms increase with disease progression and lead to worsening disability, impaired activities of daily living and quality of life. Anti-spasticity medications and analgesics are of limited benefit or poorly tolerated. Cannabinoids may reduce spasticity and pain in people with MS. Demand for symptomatic treatment with cannabinoids is high. A thorough understanding of the current body of evidence regarding benefits and harms of these drugs is required. OBJECTIVES To assess benefit and harms of cannabinoids, including synthetic, or herbal and plant-derived cannabinoids, for reducing symptoms for adults with MS. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases from inception to December 2021: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library), CINAHL (EBSCO host), LILACS, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the US National Institutes of Health clinical trial register, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, the International Association for Cannabinoid Medicines databank. We hand searched citation lists of included studies and relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised parallel or cross-over trials (RCTs) evaluating any cannabinoid (including herbal Cannabis, Cannabis flowers, plant-based cannabinoids, or synthetic cannabinoids) irrespective of dose, route, frequency, or duration of use for adults with MS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for parallel RCTs and crossover trials. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the following outcomes: reduction of 30% in the spasticity Numeric Rating Scale, pain relief of 50% or greater in the Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Intensity, much or very much improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs) (tolerability), serious adverse events (SAEs), nervous system disorders, psychiatric disorders, physical dependence. MAIN RESULTS We included 25 RCTs with 3763 participants of whom 2290 received cannabinoids. Age ranged from 18 to 60 years, and between 50% and 88% participants across the studies were female. The included studies were 3 to 48 weeks long and compared nabiximols, an oromucosal spray with a plant derived equal (1:1) combination of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) (13 studies), synthetic cannabinoids mimicking THC (7 studies), an oral THC extract of Cannabis sativa (2 studies), inhaled herbal Cannabis (1 study) against placebo. One study compared dronabinol, THC extract of Cannabis sativa and placebo, one compared inhaled herbal Cannabis, dronabinol and placebo. We identified eight ongoing studies. Critical outcomes • Spasticity: nabiximols probably increases the number of people who report an important reduction of perceived severity of spasticity compared with placebo (odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56 to 4.04; 5 RCTs, 1143 participants; I2 = 67%; moderate-certainty evidence). The absolute effect was 216 more people (95% CI 99 more to 332 more) per 1000 reporting benefit with cannabinoids than with placebo. • Chronic neuropathic pain: we found only one small trial that measured the number of participants reporting substantial pain relief with a synthetic cannabinoid compared with placebo (OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 16.17; 1 study, 48 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether cannabinoids reduce chronic neuropathic pain intensity. • Treatment discontinuation due to AEs: cannabinoids may increase slightly the number of participants who discontinue treatment compared with placebo (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.84; 21 studies, 3110 participants; I² = 17%; low-certainty evidence); the absolute effect is 39 more people (95% CI 15 more to 76 more) per 1000 people. Important outcomes • PGIC: cannabinoids probably increase the number of people who report 'very much' or 'much' improvement in health status compared with placebo (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.36; 8 studies, 1215 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). The absolute effect is 113 more people (95% CI 57 more to 175 more) per 1000 people reporting improvement. • HRQoL: cannabinoids may have little to no effect on HRQoL (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.02; 8 studies, 1942 participants; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence); • SAEs: cannabinoids may result in little to no difference in the number of participants who have SAEs compared with placebo (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.99; 20 studies, 3124 participants; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence); • AEs of the nervous system: cannabinoids may increase nervous system disorders compared with placebo (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.44; 7 studies, 1154 participants; I² = 63%; low-certainty evidence); • Psychiatric disorders: cannabinoids may increase psychiatric disorders compared with placebo (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.88; 6 studies, 1122 participants; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence); • Drug tolerance: the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of cannabinoids on drug tolerance (OR 3.07, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.95; 2 studies, 458 participants; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo, nabiximols probably reduces the severity of spasticity in the short-term in people with MS. We are uncertain about the effect on chronic neurological pain and health-related quality of life. Cannabinoids may increase slightly treatment discontinuation due to AEs, nervous system and psychiatric disorders compared with placebo. We are uncertain about the effect on drug tolerance. The overall certainty of evidence is limited by short-term duration of the included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziella Filippini
- Scientific Director's Office, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Borrelli
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Michela Cinquini
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Kerry Dwan
- Review Production and Quality Unit, Editorial & Methods Department, Cochrane Central Executive, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Efficacy of Cannabis on Multiple Sclerosis-Related Symptoms. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12050682. [PMID: 35629350 PMCID: PMC9148011 DOI: 10.3390/life12050682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is known as an autoimmune disease that damages the neurons in the central nervous system. MS is characterized by its most common symptoms of spasticity, muscle spasms, neuropathic pain, tremors, bladder dysfunction, dysarthria, and some intellectual problems, including memory disturbances. Several clinical studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of cannabis on the relief of these symptoms in MS patients. The efficacy of Cannabis sativa (C. Sativa) in the management of MS outcomes such as spasticity, pain, tremors, ataxia, bladder functions, sleep, quality of life, and adverse effects were assessed in this review. Most clinical studies showed the positive effects of cannabinoids with their different routes of administration, such as oromucosal spray and oral form, in reducing most MS symptoms. The oromucosal spray Nabiximols demonstrated an improvement in reducing MS spasticity, pain, and quality of life with a tolerated adverse effect. Oral cannabinoids are significantly effective for treating MS pain and spasticity, while the other symptoms indicate slight improvement and the evidence is quite inconsistent. Oromucosal spray and oral cannabis are mainly used for treating patients with MS and have positive effects on treating the most common symptoms of MS, such as pain and spasticity, whereas the other MS symptoms indicated slight improvement, for which further studies are needed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Central Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: Current and Emerging Pharmacological Strategies. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:483-516. [PMID: 35513603 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00914-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Central neuropathic pain is caused by a disease or lesion of the brain or spinal cord. It is difficult to predict which patients will develop central pain syndromes after a central nervous system injury, but depending on the etiology, lifetime prevalence may be greater than 50%. The resulting pain is often highly distressing and difficult to treat, with no specific treatment guidelines currently available. This narrative review discusses mechanisms contributing to central neuropathic pain, and focuses on pharmacological approaches for managing common central neuropathic pain conditions such as central post-stroke pain, spinal cord injury-related pain, and multiple sclerosis-related neuropathic pain. Tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and gabapentinoids have some evidence for efficacy in central neuropathic pain. Medications from other pharmacologic classes may also provide pain relief, but current evidence is limited. Certain non-pharmacologic approaches, neuromodulation in particular, may be helpful in refractory cases. Emerging data suggest that modulating the primary afferent input may open new horizons for the treatment of central neuropathic pain. For most patients, effective treatment will likely require a multimodal therapy approach.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hill KP, Gold MS, Nemeroff CB, McDonald W, Grzenda A, Widge AS, Rodriguez C, Kraguljac NV, Krystal JH, Carpenter LL. Risks and Benefits of Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2022; 179:98-109. [PMID: 34875873 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21030320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The United States is in the midst of rapidly changing laws regarding cannabis. The increasing availability of cannabis for recreational and medical use requires that mental health clinicians be knowledgeable about evidence to be considered when counseling both patients and colleagues. In this review, the authors outline the evidence from randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials for therapeutic use of cannabinoids for specific medical conditions and the potential side effects associated with acute and chronic cannabis use. METHODS Searches of PubMed and PsycInfo were conducted for articles published through July 2021 reporting on "cannabis" or "cannabinoids" or "medicinal cannabis." Additional articles were identified from the reference lists of published reviews. Articles that did not contain the terms "clinical trial" or "therapy" in the title or abstract were not reviewed. A total of 4,431 articles were screened, and 841 articles that met criteria for inclusion were reviewed by two or more authors. RESULTS There are currently no psychiatric indications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cannabinoids, and there is limited evidence supporting the therapeutic use of cannabinoids for treatment of psychiatric disorders. To date, evidence supporting cannabinoid prescription beyond the FDA indications is strongest for the management of pain and spasticity. CONCLUSIONS As cannabinoids become more available, the need for an evidence base adequately evaluating their safety and efficacy is increasingly important. There is considerable evidence that cannabinoids have a potential for harm in vulnerable populations such as adolescents and those with psychotic disorders. The current evidence base is insufficient to support the prescription of cannabinoids for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Hill
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Mark S Gold
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Charles B Nemeroff
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - William McDonald
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Adrienne Grzenda
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Alik S Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Carolyn Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Nina V Kraguljac
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - John H Krystal
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Landrigan J, Bessenyei K, Leitner D, Yakovenko I, Fisk JD, Prentice JL. A systematic review of the effects of cannabis on cognition in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 57:103338. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
20
|
Rehman Y, Kirsch J, Bhatia S, Johnston R, Bingham J, Senger B, Swogger S, Snider KT. Impact of osteopathic manipulative techniques on the management of dizziness caused by neuro-otologic disorders: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. INT J OSTEOPATH MED 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
21
|
Riera R, Pacheco RL, Bagattini ÂM, Martimbianco ALC. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic use of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogs: Overview of systematic reviews. Phytother Res 2021; 36:5-21. [PMID: 34841610 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The debate on the use of cannabinoids for therapeutic purposes is constantly on the rise. This overview aimed to map the evidence on the therapeutic effects of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogs. Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized trials were identified through a comprehensive search in several databases, and their methodological quality were evaluated with AMSTAR-2. The results for main outcomes are presented, prioritizing those from updated and better quality SRs. Finally, 68 SRs, addressing 37 different health conditions, were included. The methodological quality was high for eight SRs. The evidence certainty (GRADE) for the effects of cannabinoids is not high for any of the outcomes identified. Evidence certainty was moderate for the following: (a) cannabidiol appears to be beneficial for quality of life but increases the risk of adverse events in ulcerative colitis; (b) cannabinoids in general appear to have no clinically important benefit for chronic non-oncologic pain, spasticity-related pain in multiple sclerosis, or for acute post-operative pain; (c) cannabinoids in general appear to have a benefit in reducing chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting. For all other outcomes from remaining comparisons, the evidence certainty was low, very low, or not evaluated, which prevents recommendations for or against their routine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Riera
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo - SP, Brazil
| | - Rafael Leite Pacheco
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Centro de Pesquisa Médica, Centro Universitário São Camilo (CUSC), São Paulo - SP, Brazil
| | - Ângela Maria Bagattini
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Instituto de Medicina Tropical e Saúde Publica, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia - GO, Brazil
| | - Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Mestrado Profissional em Saúde e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (Unimes), Santos - SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clinical application of stem cell therapy in neurogenic bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 33:2081-2097. [PMID: 34767058 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04986-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS This review aims to investigate the effect of stem cell (SC) therapy on the management of neurogenic bladder (NGB) in four neurological diseases, including spinal cord injury (SCI), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and stroke, in the clinical setting. METHODS An electronic database search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Proquest, Clinicaltrial.gov , WHO, Google Scholar, MEDLINE via PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, ongoing trial registers, and conference proceedings in June 2019 and updated by hand searching on 1 February 2021. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi RCTs, phase I/II clinical trials, case-control, retrospective cohorts, and comprehensive case series that evaluated the regenerative potential of SCs on the management of NGB were included. Cochrane appraisal risk of bias checklist and the standardized critical appraisal instrument from the JBI Meta-Analysis of Statistics, Assessment, and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) were used to appraise the studies. RESULTS Twenty-six studies among 1282 relevant publications met our inclusion criteria. Only SC therapy was applied for SCI or MS patients. Phase I/II clinical trials (without control arm) were the most conducted studies, and only four were RCTs. Four studies with 153 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The main route of transplantation was via lumbar puncture. There were no serious adverse events. Only nine studies in SCI and one in MS have used urodynamics, and the others have reported improvement based on patient satisfaction. SC therapy did not significantly improve residual urine volume, detrusor pressure, and maximum bladder capacity. Also, the quality of these publications was low or unclear. CONCLUSION Although most clinical trials provide evidence of the safety and effectiveness of MSCs on the management of NGB, the meta-analysis results did not show a significant improvement; however, the interpretation of study results is difficult because of the lack of placebo controls.
Collapse
|
23
|
Hansen JS, Hansen RM, Petersen T, Gustavsen S, Oturai AB, Sellebjerg F, Sædder EA, Kasch H, Rasmussen PV, Finnerup NB, Svendsen KB. The Effect of Cannabis-Based Medicine on Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Spinal Cord Injury: Study Protocol of a National Multicenter Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11091212. [PMID: 34573231 PMCID: PMC8465969 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Disease or acquired damage to the central nervous system frequently causes disabling spasticity and central neuropathic pain (NP), both of which are frequent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients with MS and SCI often request treatment with cannabis-based medicine (CBM). However, knowledge about effects, side effects, choice of active cannabinoids (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) alone or in combination), and doses of CBM remains limited. Using a double-blind, parallel design in a national multicenter cohort, this study examines the effect of CBM on spasticity and NP. Patients are randomized to treatment with capsules containing either THC, CBD, THC and CBD, or placebo. Primary endpoints are patient-reported pain and spasticity on a numerical rating scale. Other endpoints include quality of life and sleep, depression and anxiety, and relief of pain and spasticity. Side-effects of CBM are described. In a sub-study, the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral capsule CBM are examined. We expect that the study will contribute to the literature by providing information on the effects and side-effects of CBD, THC, and the combination of the two for central neuropathic pain and spasticity. Furthermore, we will describe the PD/PK of THC and CBD in a patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Schjødtz Hansen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (P.V.R.); (N.B.F.); (K.B.S.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark;
- Correspondence:
| | - Rikke Middelhede Hansen
- Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark Viborg Regional Hospital, DK-8800 Viborg, Denmark;
| | - Thor Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of Southern Jutland and Research Unit in Neurology, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Stefan Gustavsen
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark; (S.G.); (A.B.O.); (F.S.)
| | - Annette Bang Oturai
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark; (S.G.); (A.B.O.); (F.S.)
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark; (S.G.); (A.B.O.); (F.S.)
| | - Eva Aggerholm Sædder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark;
| | - Helge Kasch
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark;
- Department of Neurology, Viborg Regional Hospital, DK-8800 Viborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (P.V.R.); (N.B.F.); (K.B.S.)
| | - Nanna Brix Finnerup
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (P.V.R.); (N.B.F.); (K.B.S.)
- Danish Pain Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Kristina Bacher Svendsen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; (P.V.R.); (N.B.F.); (K.B.S.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Prieto González JM, Vila Silván C. Safety and tolerability of nabiximols oromucosal spray: a review of more than 15 years" accumulated evidence from clinical trials. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:755-778. [PMID: 34092180 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1935879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Nabiximols, a cannabinoid-based oromucosal spray, is indicated as add-on therapy for symptomatic relief of spasticity in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This review compiles tolerability and safety data from clinical trials that investigated nabiximols for spasticity and/or chronic pain.Areas covered: Systematic searches identified 38 placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or post-RCT open-label studies reporting safety data: 15 in spasticity; 16 in neuropathic pain; six in chronic cancer pain; and one in rheumatoid arthritis pain. In RCTs, discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) for nabiximols and placebo were lower in spasticity studies (5.4% and 2.8%) than in neuropathic pain (12.9% and 5.3%) or cancer pain (19.5% and 16.6%) studies. The most consistently identified AEs were dizziness, nausea and fatigue in spasticity or neuropathic pain studies; and dizziness, nausea, vomiting and somnolence in cancer pain studies. Serious AE (SAE) rates for nabiximols and placebo were higher in cancer pain (21.8% and 16.9%) than in MS spasticity (4.7% vs. 0.8%) and neuropathic pain (4.1% vs. 3.1%) studies despite similar dose ranges. Treatment-related SAEs showed no particular pattern.Expert opinion: More than 15 years of investigation of nabiximols oromucosal spray in spasticity and chronic pain conditions indicates an acceptable overall safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José María Prieto González
- Jefe del Servicio de Neurología/Neurology Service Head, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Moore RA, Fisher E, Finn DP, Finnerup NB, Gilron I, Haroutounian S, Krane E, Rice ASC, Rowbotham M, Wallace M, Eccleston C. Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines for pain management: an overview of systematic reviews. Pain 2021; 162:S67-S79. [PMID: 32804833 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines (CBM) are increasingly used to manage pain, with limited understanding of their efficacy and safety. We assessed methodological quality, scope, and results of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials of these treatments. Several search strategies sought self-declared systematic reviews. Methodological quality was assessed using both AMSTAR-2 and techniques important for bias reduction in pain studies. Of the 106 articles read, 57 were self-declared systematic reviews, most published since 2010. They included any type of cannabinoid, cannabis, or CBM, at any dose, however administered, in a broad range of pain conditions. No review examined the effects of a particular cannabinoid, at a particular dose, using a particular route of administration, for a particular pain condition, reporting a particular analgesic outcome. Confidence in the results in the systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 definitions was critically low (41), low (8), moderate (6), or high (2). Few used criteria important for bias reduction in pain. Cochrane reviews typically provided higher confidence; all industry-conflicted reviews provided critically low confidence. Meta-analyses typically pooled widely disparate studies, and, where assessable, were subject to potential publication bias. Systematic reviews with positive or negative recommendation for use of cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in pain typically rated critically low or low (24/25 [96%] positive; 10/12 [83%] negative). Current reviews are mostly lacking in quality and cannot provide a basis for decision-making. A new high-quality systematic review of randomised controlled trials is needed to critically assess the clinical evidence for cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David P Finn
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Galway Neuroscience Centre and Centre for Pain Research, NCBES, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nanna B Finnerup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ian Gilron
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Simon Haroutounian
- Division of Clinical and Translational Research, Washington University Pain Center, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Elliot Krane
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Andrew S C Rice
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Rowbotham
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United Kingdom
- Sutter Health, CPMC Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Mark Wallace
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim-Fine S, Greenfield J, Chaput KH, Robert M, Metz LM. Cannabinoids and bladder symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 54:103105. [PMID: 34216995 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on the health benefits of cannabis has been limited because use remains restricted or illegal in most countries. Medical cannabis has been legal in Canada since 2001 and recreational use became legal in October 2018. While there are data that support a biological mechanism by which cannabinoids can impact various other symptoms of MS, the evidence of effectiveness of cannabis as a treatment for bladder symptoms remains unsettled. We conducted an exploratory study to describe the current trends of cannabis product consumption among people with MS (PwMS) and their association with perceived benefits on MS symptoms. METHODS A cross-sectional survey study of PwMS, recruited from the MS Clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada was undertaken. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between cannabis consumption and improvement in bladder function symptoms. RESULTS There were 775 respondents out of 2899 PwMS contacted by email. Among respondents, 734 reported cannabis use in the past 3 months. There were 275 (37.5%) respondents who reported cannabis use in the prior 3 months, and 73.8% of these reported at least weekly use of cannabis. Among all users, 78.1% reported a primary medical or therapeutic indication for consumption. The most common modes of cannabis consumption were oral-edible (69.0%) and smoked (57.1%), while 59.3% used more than one mode of consumption and 2.6% used five different modes. The most common reasons for cannabis use were for sleep (58.3%), pain (51.5%), relaxation (44.4%), muscle spasms (40.2%), anxiety (33.8%) and depression (22.9%). Among the 19 participants who reported bladder symptoms as a main reason for cannabis use, 89.5% reported "better" bladder symptoms when using cannabis. Cannabis consumption in the past 3 months was associated with a two-fold increased odds of reporting improvement in urinary frequency, urinary urgency, bladder leakage and wetness, pad use and bladder emptying. CONCLUSIONS Cannabis is commonly used in this survey study of personal cannabis use among PwMS. Patterns of use, dosing, frequency and mode of delivery are diverse among survey respondents. This pilot study provides some initial glimpses into real world therapeutic use of cannabinoids among PwMS for bladder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunaha Kim-Fine
- Section of Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Dept OBGYN, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary.
| | - Jamie Greenfield
- Dept of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Kathleen H Chaput
- Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Magali Robert
- Section of Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Dept OBGYN, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Luanne M Metz
- Dept of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jugl S, Okpeku A, Costales B, Morris EJ, Alipour-Haris G, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Stetten NE, Sajdeya R, Keshwani S, Joseph V, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Adkins L, Winterstein AG, Goodin A. A Mapping Literature Review of Medical Cannabis Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Evidence in Approved Conditions in the USA from 2016 to 2019. Med Cannabis Cannabinoids 2021; 4:21-42. [PMID: 34676348 PMCID: PMC8525213 DOI: 10.1159/000515069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2017, a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) report comprehensively evaluated the body of evidence regarding cannabis health effects through the year 2016. The objectives of this study are to identify and map the most recently (2016-2019) published literature across approved conditions for medical cannabis and to evaluate the quality of identified recent systematic reviews, published following the NASEM report. Following the literature search from 5 databases and consultation with experts, 11 conditions were identified for evidence compilation and evaluation: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, autism, cancer, chronic noncancer pain, Crohn's disease, epilepsy, glaucoma, human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease, and posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 198 studies were included after screening for condition-specific relevance and after imposing the following exclusion criteria: preclinical focus, non-English language, abstracts only, editorials/commentary, case studies/series, and non-U.S. study setting. Data extracted from studies included: study design type, outcome definition, intervention definition, sample size, study setting, and reported effect size. Few completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Studies classified as systematic reviews were graded using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 tool to evaluate the quality of evidence. Few high-quality systematic reviews were available for most conditions, with the exceptions of MS (9 of 9 graded moderate/high quality; evidence for 2/9 indicating cannabis improved outcomes; evidence for 7/9 indicating cannabis inconclusive), epilepsy (3 of 4 graded moderate/high quality; 3 indicating cannabis improved outcomes; 1 indicating cannabis inconclusive), and chronic noncancer pain (12 of 13 graded moderate/high quality; evidence for 7/13 indicating cannabis improved outcomes; evidence from 6/7 indicating cannabis inconclusive). Among RCTs, we identified few studies of substantial rigor and quality to contribute to the evidence base. However, there are some conditions for which significant evidence suggests that select dosage forms and routes of administration likely have favorable risk-benefit ratios (i.e., epilepsy and chronic noncancer pain). The body of evidence for medical cannabis requires more rigorous evaluation before consideration as a treatment option for many conditions, and evidence necessary to inform policy and treatment guidelines is currently insufficient for many conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Jugl
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Aimalohi Okpeku
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brianna Costales
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Earl J. Morris
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Golnoosh Alipour-Haris
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Juan M. Hincapie-Castillo
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Ruba Sajdeya
- Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Shailina Keshwani
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Verlin Joseph
- Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yahan Zhang
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yun Shen
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Lauren Adkins
- Health Sciences Center Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Almut G. Winterstein
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Amie Goodin
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dykukha I, Malessa R, Essner U, Überall MA. Nabiximols in Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:861-874. [PMID: 33561282 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pooled analysis of nabiximols and placebo in randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of chronic neuropathic pain. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted to identify double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs of nabiximols for chronic neuropathic pain. The clinical endpoint of interest was change from baseline in mean pain score on 11-point numerical rating scales. Mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD, Hedges' g) were calculated using fixed effect (FE) and random effects (RE) models. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2). RESULTS Nine RCTs with 1289 participants were included. Quality of evidence (GRADE) was moderate. One study had a high risk of bias (RoB 2) and five had some concerns. For the pooled endpoint of change from baseline in mean pain score, nabiximols was superior to placebo, with a MD of -0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -.59 to -.21; FE, P < .0001) or -0.44 (95% CI: -.70 to -.19; RE, P = .0006). A SMD of -0.21 (95% CI: -.32 to -.10; FE) or -0.26 (95% CI: -.42 to -.10; RE) indicated an incremental benefit over background analgesia. Results in favor of nabiximols were maintained in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Nabiximols was superior to placebo for reduction of chronic neuropathic pain, with a small effect size. Larger RCTs designed to assess the effect of nabiximols in neuropathic pain are required to reach more definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Dykukha
- Medical Affairs, Almirall Hermal GmbH, Reinbek, Germany
| | - Rolf Malessa
- Klinik für Neurologie und klinische Neurophysiologie, Sophien- und Hufeland Klinikum, Weimar, Germany
| | - Ute Essner
- O. Meany Consultancy GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Prieto González JM, Vila Silván C. Safety and tolerability of nabiximols oromucosal spray: a review of real-world experience in observational studies, registries, and case reports. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:547-558. [PMID: 33749480 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1904896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Nabiximols oromucosal spray,a cannabis-based medicine containing a balanced ratio of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, is approved widely as an add-on therapy for symptomatic relief of spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Most safety data for nabiximols derive from use in MS spasticity, with some data available from the analgesia area. AREAS COVERED : This review compiles safety and tolerability data from all published observational studies, registry analyses, and case reports identified in systematic searches in which nabiximols oromucosal spray was investigated for spasticity (n = 20) and/or chronic non-cancer pain (n = 4). Aligning with the known safety profile of nabiximols as demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, common adverse events reported consistently across studies conducted under clinical practice conditions were dizziness, fatigue and somnolence. The serious adverse event (SAE) rate with nabiximols in MS spasticityobservational studies was 3.1% (137/4351). A total of 39 treatment-related SAEs were reported in 32 patients with spasticity, all of which (where specified) were resolved. No treatment-related SAEs were recorded in nabiximols pain studies. EXPERT OPINION : Real-world experience with nabiximols oromucosal spray in treating spasticity and chronic pain indicates that, overall, it is well tolerated and has a good safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José María Prieto González
- Jefe Del Servicio De Neurología/Neurology Service Head, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lim XY, Tan TYC, Muhd Rosli SH, Sa’at MNF, Sirdar Ali S, Syed Mohamed AF. Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa's pharmacological properties and health effects: A scoping review of current evidence. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245471. [PMID: 33465140 PMCID: PMC7815160 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hemp (Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa), commonly used for industrial purposes, is now being consumed by the public for various health promoting effects. As popularity of hemp research and claims of beneficial effects rises, a systematic collection of current scientific evidence on hemp’s health effects and pharmacological properties is needed to guide future research, clinical, and policy decision making. Objective To provide an overview and identify the present landscape of hemp research topics, trends, and gaps. Methods A systematic search and analysis strategy according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis-ScR (PRISMA-ScR) checklist on electronic databases including MEDLINE, OVID (OVFT, APC Journal Club, EBM Reviews), Cochrane Library Central and Clinicaltrials.gov was conducted to include and analyse hemp research articles from 2009 to 2019. Results 65 primary articles (18 clinical, 47 pre-clinical) were reviewed. Several randomised controlled trials showed hempseed pills (in Traditional Chinese Medicine formulation MaZiRenWan) improving spontaneous bowel movement in functional constipation. There was also evidence suggesting benefits in cannabis dependence, epilepsy, and anxiety disorders. Pre-clinically, hemp derivatives showed potential anti-oxidative, anti-hypertensive, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-neuroinflammatory, anti-arthritic, anti-acne, and anti-microbial activities. Renal protective effects and estrogenic properties were also exhibited in vitro. Conclusion Current evidence on hemp-specific interventions are still preliminary, with limited high quality clinical evidence for any specific therapeutic indication. This is mainly due to the wide variation in test item formulation, as the multiple variants of this plant differ in their phytochemical and bioactive compounds. Future empirical research should focus on standardising the hemp plant for pharmaceutical use, and uniformity in experimental designs to strengthen the premise of using hemp in medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yi Lim
- Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Shah Alam, Malaysia
- * E-mail:
| | - Terence Yew Chin Tan
- Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Siti Hajar Muhd Rosli
- Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Muhammad Nor Farhan Sa’at
- Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Syazwani Sirdar Ali
- Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Ami Fazlin Syed Mohamed
- Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Śledziński P, Nowak-Terpiłowska A, Zeyland J. Cannabinoids in Medicine: Cancer, Immunity, and Microbial Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 22:E263. [PMID: 33383838 PMCID: PMC7795897 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, there has been a growing interest in the medical applications of Cannabis plants. They owe their unique properties to a group of secondary metabolites known as phytocannabinoids, which are specific for this genus. Phytocannabinoids, and cannabinoids generally, can interact with cannabinoid receptors being part of the endocannabinoid system present in animals. Over the years a growing body of scientific evidence has been gathered, suggesting that these compounds have therapeutic potential. In this article, we review the classification of cannabinoids, the molecular mechanisms of their interaction with animal cells as well as their potential application in the treatment of human diseases. Specifically, we focus on the research concerning the anticancer potential of cannabinoids in preclinical studies, their possible use in cancer treatment and palliative medicine, as well as their influence on the immune system. We also discuss their potential as therapeutic agents in infectious, autoimmune, and gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases. We postulate that the currently ongoing and future clinical trials should be accompanied by research focused on the cellular and molecular response to cannabinoids and Cannabis extracts, which will ultimately allow us to fully understand the mechanism, potency, and safety profile of cannabinoids as single agents and as complementary drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Śledziński
- Department of Genome Engineering, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-032 Poznan, Poland;
| | | | - Joanna Zeyland
- Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-632 Poznan, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in legal access to cannabis, driven largely by activists and business interests. As a result, the population of cannabis users nationwide-especially daily users-has grown significantly. An estimated 4.5-7 million persons in the United States now meet criteria for cannabis use disorder annually. This article focuses on the effects of cannabis use, intoxication, and withdrawal while also reviewing the developmental pathways of cannabis use disorder as well as evidence-based pharmacologic and psychosocial treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Robin Williams
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York (A.R.W.)
| | - Kevin P Hill
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.P.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cannabinoids in Urology. Which Benign Conditions Might They Be Appropriate to Treat: A Systematic Review. Urology 2020; 148:8-25. [PMID: 33129871 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
There is growing evidence suggesting cannabinoids may provide suitable alternatives to conventional treatments in an increasing number of clinical settings. This review evaluates how cannabinoids are used to treat certain benign urological pathologies and to clarify the clinical value of this data. This review includes 62 papers and was undertaken per PRISMA's guidelines, it evidences the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in the management of specific benign urological diseases, most notably neurogenic bladder dysfunction (clinical studies), renal disease (animal studies), and interstitial cystitis (animal studies). However, whilst cannabinoids are increasingly used, they cannot be considered reliable alternatives to more recognised treatments.
Collapse
|
34
|
Poyatos L, Pérez-Acevedo AP, Papaseit E, Pérez-Mañá C, Martin S, Hladun O, Siles A, Torrens M, Busardo FP, Farré M. Oral Administration of Cannabis and Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Preparations: A Systematic Review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56060309. [PMID: 32585912 PMCID: PMC7353904 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56060309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background and objective: Changes in cannabis legalization regimes in several countries have influenced the diversification of cannabis use. There is an ever-increasing number of cannabis forms available, which are gaining popularity for both recreational and therapeutic use. From a therapeutic perspective, oral cannabis containing Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) is a promising route of administration but there is still little information about its pharmacokinetics (PK) effects in humans. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a general overview of the available PK data on cannabis and THC after oral administration. Materials and Methods: A search of the published literature was conducted using the PubMed database to collect available articles describing the PK data of THC after oral administration in humans. Results: The literature search yielded 363 results, 26 of which met our inclusion criteria. The PK of oral THC has been studied using capsules (including oil content), tablets, baked goods (brownies and cookies), and oil and tea (decoctions). Capsules and tablets, which mainly correspond to pharmaceutical forms, were found to be the oral formulations most commonly studied. Overall, the results reflect the high variability in the THC absorption of oral formulations, with delayed peak plasma concentrations compared to other routes of administration. Conclusions: Oral THC has a highly variable PK profile that differs between formulations, with seemingly higher variability in baked goods and oil forms. Overall, there is limited information available in this field. Therefore, further investigations are required to unravel the unpredictability of oral THC administration to increase the effectiveness and safety of oral formulations in medicinal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lourdes Poyatos
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
| | - Ana Pilar Pérez-Acevedo
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-934978865
| | - Esther Papaseit
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
| | - Clara Pérez-Mañá
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
| | - Soraya Martin
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Olga Hladun
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
| | - Adrià Siles
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain;
| | - Marta Torrens
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
- Drug Addiction Program, Institut de Neuropsiquiatria, Parc de Salut Mar and Institut Hospital del Mar de Recerca Mèdica (PSMAR-IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Paolo Busardo
- Department of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Magí Farré
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and Institut de Recerca Germans Trias (HUGTiP-IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain; (L.P.); (E.P.); (C.P.-M.); (S.M.); (O.H.); (M.F.)
- Departments of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology and Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P. Hill
- Division of Addiction Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Levinsohn EA, Hill KP. Clinical uses of cannabis and cannabinoids in the United States. J Neurol Sci 2020; 411:116717. [PMID: 32044684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The role of cannabis in medicine is rapidly evolving. Medical cannabis is now legal in a majority of states, and THC and CBD, the prominent cannabinoids found in cannabis, have both been utilized in the development of FDA-approved drugs. Due to the complicated legal status of cannabis and cannabinoids, as well as regulations that vary from state to state, the appropriate use of these substances for both patients as well as clinicians is often unclear. Advancements in the understanding of the pharmacology of cannabis have led to numerous proposed uses of these drugs, including as antidepressant or analgesic agents. However, clinical trial data for these substances suggests that many purported indications of cannabis and cannabinoids are not supported by good clinical data. Furthermore, cannabis and several cannabinoid-based medications have potentially concerning side effect profiles that may limit their use in certain patient populations. As the legal status and clinical database of these medications continue to evolve, physicians will need to continue to balance the real potential of these compounds with their limitations and adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik A Levinsohn
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Kevin P Hill
- Addiction Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Beedham W, Sbai M, Allison I, Coary R, Shipway D. Cannabinoids in the Older Person: A Literature Review. Geriatrics (Basel) 2020; 5:E2. [PMID: 31941020 PMCID: PMC7151062 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics5010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medical cannabinoids have received significant mainstream media attention in recent times due to an evolving political and clinical landscape. Whilst the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of some childhood epilepsy syndromes is increasingly recognized, medical cannabinoids may also have potential clinical roles in the treatment of older adults. Prescribing restrictions for medical cannabinoids in certain jurisdictions (including the UK) has recently been relaxed. However, few geriatricians have the detailed knowledge or awareness of the potential risks or rewards of utilizing cannabinoids in the older person; even fewer geriatricians have direct experience of using these drugs in their own clinical practice. Older persons are more likely to suffer from medical illness representing potential indications for medical cannabinoids (e.g., pain); equally they may be more vulnerable to any adverse effects. AIM This narrative literature review aims to provide a brief introduction for the geriatrician to the potential indications, evidence-base, contra-indications and side effects of medical cannabinoids in older people. METHODS A search was conducted of CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and psycINFO, Cochrane and Web of Science databases. Reference lists were hand searched. Abstracts and titles were screened, followed by a full text reading of relevant articles. RESULTS 35 studies were identified as relevant for this narrative review. CONCLUSIONS Cannabinoids demonstrate some efficacy in the treatment of pain and chemotherapy-related nausea; limited data suggest potential benefits in the treatment of spasticity and anxiety. Risks of cannabinoids in older patients appear to be moderate, and their frequency comparable to other analgesic drug classes. However, the quality of research is weak, and few older patients have been enrolled in cannabinoid studies. Dedicated research is needed to determine the efficiency and safety of cannabinoids in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Beedham
- Medical Student, University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham B15 2SG, UK; (W.B.); (I.A.)
| | - Magda Sbai
- Consultant Physician and Perioperative Geriatrician, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Isabel Allison
- Medical Student, University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham B15 2SG, UK; (W.B.); (I.A.)
| | - Roisin Coary
- Specialist Registrar in Geriatric and General Medicine, St James’s Hospital, P.O. Box 580 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - David Shipway
- Consultant Physician and Perioperative Geriatrician, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB& Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bonaccorso S, Ricciardi A, Zangani C, Chiappini S, Schifano F. Cannabidiol (CBD) use in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review. Neurotoxicology 2019; 74:282-298. [PMID: 31412258 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are the most represented phytocannabinoids in Cannabis sativa plants. However, CBD may present with a different activity compared with the psychotomimetic THC. Most typically, CBD is reported to be used in some medical conditions, including chronic pain. Conversely, the main aim of this systematic review is to assess and summarise the available body of evidence relating to both efficacy and safety of CBD as a treatment for psychiatric disorders, alone and/or in combination with other treatments. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing the effect of CBD in a range of psychopathological conditions, such as substance use; psychosis, anxiety, mood disturbances, and other psychiatric (e.g., cognitive impairment; sleep; personality; eating; obsessive-compulsive; post-traumatic stress/PTSD; dissociative; and somatic) disorders. For data gathering purposes, the PRISMA guidelines were followed. The initial search strategy identified some n = 1301 papers; n = 190 studies were included after the abstract's screening and n = 27 articles met the inclusion criteria. There is currently limited evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of CBD for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. However, available trials reported potential therapeutic effects for specific psychopathological conditions, such as substance use disorders, chronic psychosis, and anxiety. Further large-scale RCTs are required to better evaluate the efficacy of CBD in both acute and chronic illnesses, special categories, as well as to exclude any possible abuse liability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelo Ricciardi
- Camden and Islington NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Caroline Zangani
- Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Stefania Chiappini
- Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Fabrizio Schifano
- Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Illegal cannabis use is common among Danes with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 33:5-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
40
|
Rodrigues RS, Lourenço DM, Paulo SL, Mateus JM, Ferreira MF, Mouro FM, Moreira JB, Ribeiro FF, Sebastião AM, Xapelli S. Cannabinoid Actions on Neural Stem Cells: Implications for Pathophysiology. Molecules 2019; 24:E1350. [PMID: 30959794 PMCID: PMC6480122 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24071350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
With the increase of life expectancy, neurodegenerative disorders are becoming not only a health but also a social burden worldwide. However, due to the multitude of pathophysiological disease states, current treatments fail to meet the desired outcomes. Therefore, there is a need for new therapeutic strategies focusing on more integrated, personalized and effective approaches. The prospect of using neural stem cells (NSC) as regenerative therapies is very promising, however several issues still need to be addressed. In particular, the potential actions of pharmacological agents used to modulate NSC activity are highly relevant. With the ongoing discussion of cannabinoid usage for medical purposes and reports drawing attention to the effects of cannabinoids on NSC regulation, there is an enormous, and yet, uncovered potential for cannabinoids as treatment options for several neurological disorders, specifically when combined with stem cell therapy. In this manuscript, we review in detail how cannabinoids act as potent regulators of NSC biology and their potential to modulate several neurogenic features in the context of pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui S Rodrigues
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Diogo M Lourenço
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Sara L Paulo
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Joana M Mateus
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Miguel F Ferreira
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Francisco M Mouro
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - João B Moreira
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Filipa F Ribeiro
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Ana M Sebastião
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Sara Xapelli
- Instituto de Farmacologia e Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gonçalves J, Rosado T, Soares S, Simão AY, Caramelo D, Luís Â, Fernández N, Barroso M, Gallardo E, Duarte AP. Cannabis and Its Secondary Metabolites: Their Use as Therapeutic Drugs, Toxicological Aspects, and Analytical Determination. MEDICINES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 6:E31. [PMID: 30813390 PMCID: PMC6473697 DOI: 10.3390/medicines6010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Although the medicinal properties of Cannabis species have been known for centuries, the interest on its main active secondary metabolites as therapeutic alternatives for several pathologies has grown in recent years. This potential use has been a revolution worldwide concerning public health, production, use and sale of cannabis, and has led inclusively to legislation changes in some countries. The scientific advances and concerns of the scientific community have allowed a better understanding of cannabis derivatives as pharmacological options in several conditions, such as appetite stimulation, pain treatment, skin pathologies, anticonvulsant therapy, neurodegenerative diseases, and infectious diseases. However, there is some controversy regarding the legal and ethical implications of their use and routes of administration, also concerning the adverse health consequences and deaths attributed to marijuana consumption, and these represent some of the complexities associated with the use of these compounds as therapeutic drugs. This review comprehends the main secondary metabolites of Cannabis, approaching their therapeutic potential and applications, as well as their potential risks, in order to differentiate the consumption as recreational drugs. There will be also a focus on the analytical methodologies for their analysis, in order to aid health professionals and toxicologists in cases where these compounds are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Gonçalves
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Tiago Rosado
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Sofia Soares
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Ana Y Simão
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Débora Caramelo
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Ângelo Luís
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Nicolás Fernández
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Toxicología y Química Legal, Laboratorio de Asesoramiento Toxicológico Analítico (CENATOXA). Junín 956 7mo piso. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Buenos Aires C1113AAD, Argentina.
| | - Mário Barroso
- Serviço de Química e Toxicologia Forenses, Instituto de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses - Delegação do Sul, 1169-201 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Eugenia Gallardo
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Ana Paula Duarte
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Slaven
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Oren Levine
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|