1
|
Nugent K, Das P, Ford D, Sabharwal A, Perna C, Dallas N, Lester J, Camilleri P. Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Daily Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Acute and Late Patient-Reported Toxicity Outcomes. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101574. [PMID: 39224488 PMCID: PMC11367053 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report acute and late bowel, urinary, and sexual dysfunction patient-reported outcome measures, among patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided daily adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). Methods and Materials All patients who completed a baseline 12-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire, before undergoing SMART with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions, were subsequently followed up with the same graded questionnaire at set time points. Latest prostate-specific antigen levels were recorded. The percentage of patients who reported no change from their baseline adverse event (AE) or reported a new ≥ "frequent or almost constant" or "severe grade or higher" AE grade during follow-up was calculated. The maximum 12-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade for each item was recorded for each patient. The percentage of toxicity levels for each separate AE item at set time points was calculated. Results The total number of patients was 69 with a median follow-up of 27 months. Median age of the cohort was 73 years (range, 54-85 years). The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, T stage, and Gleason score were 7.5 mmol/L (range, 4.5-32 mmol/L), T2b (range, T2-T3b), and 7 (3 + 4; range, 6-9), respectively. No patient had biochemical failure during follow-up. Regarding bowel symptoms, >80% of men reported no change from baseline toxicity during follow-up. New ≥ frequent or almost constant diarrhea was reported in 9% of patients. "Almost constant" diarrhea peaked at 1 month but was absent at >33 months. Regarding urinary symptoms, increased urinary urgency was the most common complaint (39%). Twenty percent of men reported new ≥ frequent or almost constant urinary urgency incidence peaking at 1 month but absent at >33 months. New "severe" sexual dysfunction was seen in 26% of patients and was persistent at >33 months. Conclusions Our study is one the largest patient-reported outcomes study after prostate SMART. It shows acceptable levels of toxicity even up to 2 years after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Killian Nugent
- GenesisCare UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dan Ford
- GenesisCare UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Philip Camilleri
- GenesisCare UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsueh JY, Gallagher L, Koh MJ, Shah S, Danner M, Zwart A, Ayoob M, Kumar D, Leger P, Dawson NA, Suy S, Collins SP. The impact of neoadjuvant relugolix on multi-dimensional patient-reported fatigue. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1412786. [PMID: 39188681 PMCID: PMC11345208 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1412786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Androgen deprivation therapy has been shown to improve cancer control when combined with radiotherapy. Relugolix is an oral GnRH receptor antagonist that achieves rapid profound testosterone suppression, which may increase the perception and/or impact of fatigue. This study sought to evaluate neoadjuvant relugolix-induced fatigue in prostate cancer patients prior to the start of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods Relugolix was initiated at least two months before SBRT. The 13-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire was collected at baseline and one hour prior to SBRT initiation. A five-point scale was used to score individual items. Overall scores range from 0-52 and individual item scores were converted to 0-100, with higher scores reflecting less fatigue. Five "experience" items explored self-perceptions of fatigue, and eight "impact" items sought to evaluate the effect of fatigue on daily activities. Items were evaluated for statistical significance (paired t-test, p < 0.05) and clinical significance (minimally important difference (MID); 0.5 standard deviation from baseline). Results Between March 2021 to December 2023, 89 men were treated at Georgetown with neoadjuvant relugolix and SBRT. Mean age was 71 years (range: 49-87). Median initiation of relugolix was 4.5 months prior to SBRT (range: 2-14.2 months). 93% patients achieved castration (testosterone levels ≤ 50 ng/dL) and 85% patients achieved profound castration (testosterone levels ≤ 20 ng/dL). 87 patients completed the FACIT-F questionnaire, with an average overall score of 45.6 at baseline and 41.0 at SBRT initiation. This difference was statistically and clinically significant (p < 0.01, MID = 3.55). Patients experienced an increase in fatigue for 12 of 13 items, with statistically significant changes for 11 items. Three of five experience items showed a clinically significant increase in fatigue. Only two of eight impact items were clinically significant. Discussion Our study shows that relugolix significantly increases fatigue, affecting multiple areas of life. While the fatigue does not appear to generally impact a patient's ability to carry out normal activities, patients demonstrate frustration with being too tired for these activities. It is essential for clinicians to counsel prostate cancer patients on the impact of neoadjuvant relugolix on quality-of-life issues like fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y. Hsueh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Lindsey Gallagher
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Min Ji Koh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sarthak Shah
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Malika Danner
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Alan Zwart
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Marilyn Ayoob
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Paul Leger
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nancy A. Dawson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mattes MD. Overview of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:181-192. [PMID: 38861238 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The goal is to describe the evolution of radiation therapy (RT) utilization in the management of localized and metastatic prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Long term data for a variety of hypofractionated definitive RT dose-fractionation schemes has matured, allowing patients and providers many standard-of-care options to choose from. Post-prostatectomy, adjuvant RT has largely been replaced by an early salvage approach. Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET have enabled increasingly targeted RT delivery to the prostate and oligometastatic tumors. Areas of active investigation include determining the value of proton beam therapy and perirectal spacers, and optimally incorporate genomic tumor profiling and next generation hormonal therapies with RT in the curative setting. The use of radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer is rapidly evolving. In the coming years, there will be continued improvements in a variety of areas to enhance the value of RT in multidisciplinary prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore A, Kollmeier MA, McBride SM, Toumbacaris N, Zhang Z, Lacy-Elsayegh A, Dreyfuss A, Grossman CE, Gorovets D, Zelefsky MJ. Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients with Low- or Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:812-820. [PMID: 37949730 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a standard treatment intervention for localized prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To report final long-term tumor control outcomes and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities from a single-center phase 1 dose escalation study using SBRT for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Between 2009 and 2012, 136 patients were enrolled and treated. The initial dose level was 32.5 Gy in five fractions. Doses were then sequentially escalated to 35 Gy, 37.5 Gy, and 40 Gy in five fractions delivered every other day. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was late treatment-related toxicity. Secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median follow-up was 10.5 yr for the 32.5-Gy group, 9.9 yr for the 35-Gy group, 8.2 yr for the 37.5-Gy group, and 7.3 yr for the 40-Gy group. The 8-yr cumulative incidence of PSA failure was 26% for 32.5 Gy, 15% for 35 Gy, 3.4% for 37.5 Gy, and 6.6% for 40 Gy. Higher radiation dose (37.5-40 Gy) and favorable intermediate risk (vs unfavorable intermediate risk) were associated with better PSA recurrence rates (p = 0.011 and 0.002, respectively). The 8-yr actuarial probability rates for survival free from late grade ≥2 toxicity were 94% for GI toxicity and 86% for GU toxicity. No grade 4 events were recorded. Higher dose levels were not associated with higher rates of late grade ≥2 GI (p = 0.2) or GU (p > 0.9) toxicity. CONCLUSIONS SBRT doses ranging from 32.5 to 40 Gy were associated with low incidence of moderate or severe toxicities. Higher doses resulted in superior disease control outcomes 8 yr after treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the association between the radiotherapy dose used and the rate of control of prostate cancer. We found that higher doses resulted in more favorable outcomes without excess toxicity. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00911118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicolas Toumbacaris
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmed Lacy-Elsayegh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Craig E Grossman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diven M, Ballman K, Marciscano A, Barbieri C, Piscopo J, Wang S, Nagar H, McClure T. Radiation therapy and IRreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer (RTIRE). BMC Urol 2024; 24:151. [PMID: 39054460 PMCID: PMC11271032 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01506-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation Therapy and IRreversible Electroporation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (RTIRE) is a phase II clinical trial testing combination of radiation therapy and irreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer BACKGROUND: PCa is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. PCa treatment is associated with long term side effects including urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction. Management of PCa is based on risk stratification to prevent its overtreatment and associated treatment-related toxicity. There is increasing interest in novel treatment strategies, such as focal therapy, to minimize treatment associated morbidity. Focal therapy alone has yet to be included in mainstream guidelines, given ongoing concerns with potentially higher risk of recurrence. We hypothesize combining focal therapy with whole gland, reduced dose radiotherapy will provide acceptable oncologic efficacy with minimal treatment associated morbidity. RTIRE is a phase II single institution, investigator-initiated study combining a local ablative technique though local irreversible electroporation (IRE) with MR guided RT (MRgRT) to treat the entire prostate. The goal is to provide excellent oncologic outcomes and minimize treatment related side effects through leveraging benefits of locally ablative therapy with established radiation treatment techniques. METHODS A total of 42 men with intermediate risk PCa per NCCN guidelines and focal grade group (GG) 2 or 3, Gleason Score (GS) 3 + 4 or GS 4 + 3, cancer in an MRI target will be enrolled. Patients with MRI visible foci of GG2/GG3 will undergo focal therapy with IRE of this lesion. Following successful focal therapy, patients will then undergo a course of reduced dose, whole gland MRgRT with either 32.5 Gy in 5 Fractions or 22 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary objective of the study is to determine safety. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of oncologic efficacy (as measured by the proportion of patients free of clinically significant cancer as defined as > Grade Group 1 at 1-year follow-up biopsy), imaging characteristics of patients pre and post RTIRE, impact on quality of life (QoL), and PSA kinetics. DISCUSSION Combining IRE with a reduced dose radiotherapy may offer a new treatment paradigm for PCa by both reducing treatment effects of full dose radiotherapy and minimizing the risk of recurrence observed with focal therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05345444. Date of registration: April 25, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION 6.0, July 7, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marshall Diven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Karla Ballman
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ariel Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Piscopo
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy McClure
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cattell RF, Hsia AT, Kim J, Qian X, Lu S, Slade A, Mani K, Ryu S, Xu Z. Intrafractional motion and dosimetric analysis in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy with auto beam hold technique. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:045052. [PMID: 38923907 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad4b1d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Objective: To summarize our institutional prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) experience using auto beam hold (ABH) technique for intrafractional prostate motion and assess ABH tolerance of 10-millimeter (mm) diameter.Approach: Thirty-two patients (160 fractions) treated using ABH technique between 01/2018 and 03/2021 were analyzed. During treatment, kV images were acquired every 20-degree gantry rotation to visualize 3-4 gold fiducials within prostate to track target motion. If the fiducial center fell outside the tolerance circle (diameter = 10 mm), beam was automatically turned off for reimaging and repositioning. Number of beam holds and couch translational movement magnitudes were recorded. Dosimetric differences from intrafractional motion were calculated by shifting planned isocenter.Main Results: Couch movement magnitude (mean ± SD) in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were -0.7 ± 2.5, 1.4 ± 2.9 and -0.1 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. For most fractions (77.5%), no correction was necessary. Number of fractions requiring one, two, or three corrections were 15.6%, 5.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Of the 49 corrections, couch shifts greater than 3 mm were seen primarily in the vertical (31%) and longitudinal (39%) directions; corresponding couch shifts greater than 5 mm occurred in 2% and 6% of cases. Dosimetrically, 100% coverage decreased less than 2% for clinical target volume (CTV) (-1 ± 2%) and less than 10% for PTV (-10 ± 6%). Dose to bladder, bowel and urethra tended to increase (Bladder: ΔD10%:184 ± 466 cGy, ΔD40%:139 ± 241 cGy, Bowel: ΔD1 cm3:54 ± 129 cGy; ΔD5 cm3:44 ± 116 cGy, Urethra: ΔD0.03 cm3:1 ± 1%). Doses to the rectum tended to decrease (Rectum: ΔD1 cm3:-206 ± 564 cGy, ΔD10%:-97 ± 426 cGy; ΔD20%:-50 ± 251 cGy).Significance: With the transition from conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to SBRT for localized prostate cancer treatment, it is imperative to ensure that dose delivery is spatially accurate for appropriate coverage to target volumes and limiting dose to surrounding organs. Intrafractional motion monitoring can be achieved using triggered imaging to image fiducial markers and ABH to allow for reimaging and repositioning for excessive motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee F Cattell
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - An Ting Hsia
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Jinkoo Kim
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Xin Qian
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Siming Lu
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Alexander Slade
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Kartik Mani
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Samuel Ryu
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Zhigang Xu
- Stony Brook University Hospital, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gao RW, Ma J, Pisansky TM, Kruse JJ, Stish BJ, Kowalchuk RO, McMenomy BP, Waddle MR, Phillips RM, Choo R, Davis BJ. Dosimetric Features of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2024; 12:100015. [PMID: 38827121 PMCID: PMC11137510 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report clinical and dosimetric characteristics of 5-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods All patients receiving IMPT SABR from 2017 to 2021 for localized prostate cancer at our institution were included. Five fractions were delivered every other day to the prostate +/- seminal vesicles [clinical target volume (CTV)] with 3 mm/3% robustness. A 4-field arrangement with 2 anterior oblique and 2 opposed lateral beams was used in most patients (97%), and most (99%) had a retroprostatic hydrogel spacer. Results A total of 534 patients with low (14%), favorable intermediate (45%), unfavorable intermediate (36%), high (4.0%), or very high-risk (0.6%) disease are evaluated. Prescription dose was 36.25 Gy (31%), 38 Gy (38%), or 40 Gy (31%) was prescribed. Median volume percentage of CTV receiving at least 100% of prescription dose [V100% (%)] was 100% [interquartile range: 99.99-100]. Rectum V50% (%), V80% (%), and V90% (%) were significantly lower in patients who had spacer, with a mean difference of -9.70%, -6.59%, and -4.42%, respectively, compared to those who did not have spacer. Femoral head dose was lower with a 4-field arrangement. Mean differences in left and right femoral head V40% (%) were -6.99% and -10.74%, respectively. Conclusion We provide a large, novel report of patients treated with IMPT SABR for localized prostate cancer. Four-field IMPT with hydrogel spacer provides significant sparing of rectum and femoral heads without compromising target coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W. Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jiasen Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Thomas M. Pisansky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon J. Kruse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bradley J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Mark R. Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ryan M. Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brian J. Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corrao G, Marvaso G, Mastroleo F, Biffi A, Pellegrini G, Minari S, Vincini MG, Zaffaroni M, Zerini D, Volpe S, Gaito S, Mazzola GC, Bergamaschi L, Cattani F, Petralia G, Musi G, Ceci F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Photon vs proton hypofractionation in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110264. [PMID: 38561122 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-level evidence on hypofractionated proton therapy (PT) for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients is currently missing. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic literature review to compare the toxicity and effectiveness of curative radiotherapy with photon therapy (XRT) or PT in PCa. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to April 2022. Men with a diagnosis of PCa who underwent curative hypofractionated RT treatment (PT or XRT) were included. Risk of grade (G) ≥ 2 acute and late genitourinary (GU) OR gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes were five-year biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS), clinical relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and prostate cancer-specific survival. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was assessed using Chi-square statistics and measured with the I2 index (heterogeneity measure across studies). RESULTS A total of 230 studies matched inclusion criteria and, due to overlapped populations, 160 were included in the present analysis. Significant lower rates of G ≥ 2 acute GI incidence (2 % vs 7 %) and improved 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (95 % vs 91 %) were observed in the PT arm compared to XRT. PT benefits in 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival were maintained for the moderate hypofractionated arm (p-value 0.0122) and among patients in intermediate and low-risk classes (p-values < 0.0001 and 0.0368, respectively). No statistically relevant differences were found for the other considered outcomes. CONCLUSION The present study supports that PT is safe and effective for localized PCa treatment, however, more data from RCTs are needed to draw solid evidence in this setting and further effort must be made to identify the patient subgroups that could benefit the most from PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pellegrini
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Minari
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cloître M, Benkhaled S, Boughdad S, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Zeverino M, Berthold D, Tawadros T, Meuwly JY, Martel P, Rohner C, Heym L, Duclos F, Vallet V, Valerio M, Bourhis J, Herrera F. Spatial Distribution of Recurrence and Long-Term Toxicity Following Dose Escalation to the Dominant Intra-Prostatic Nodule for Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Phase I/II Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2097. [PMID: 38893216 PMCID: PMC11171188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated spatial patterns between primary and recurrent tumor sites and assessed long-term toxicity after dose escalation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN). Materials and methods: In 33 patients with intermediate-high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), doses up to 50 Gy were administered to the DIN. Recurrence sites were determined and compared to the original tumor development sites through multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT) images. Overlap rates, categorized as 75% or higher for full overlap, and 25-74% for partial overlap, were assessed. Long-term toxicity is reported. Results: All patients completed treatment, with only one receiving concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recurrences were diagnosed after a median of 33 months (range: 17-76 months), affecting 13 out of 33 patients (39.4%). Intra-prostatic recurrences occurred in 7 patients (21%), with ≥75% overlap in two, a partial overlap in another two, and no overlap in the remaining three patients. Notably, five patients with intra-prostatic recurrences had synchronous bone and/or lymph node metastases, while six patients had isolated bone or lymph node metastasis without intra-prostatic recurrences. Extended follow-up revealed late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity in 18% (n = 6) and 6% (n = 2) of the patients. Conclusions: Among patients with intermediate-high-risk PCa undergoing focal dose-escalated SBRT without ADT, DIN recurrences were infrequent. When present, these recurrences were typically located at the original site or adjacent to the initial tumor. Conversely, relapses beyond the DIN and in extra-prostatic (metastatic) sites were prevalent, underscoring the significance of systemic ADT in managing this patient population. Advances in knowledge: Focal dose-escalated prostate SBRT prevented recurrences in the dominant nodule; however, extra-prostatic recurrence sites were frequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Cloître
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Sofian Benkhaled
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Sarah Boughdad
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (S.B.); (N.S.); (J.O.P.)
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (S.B.); (N.S.); (J.O.P.)
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (S.B.); (N.S.); (J.O.P.)
| | - Michele Zeverino
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Dominik Berthold
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Tawadros
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Jean-Yves Meuwly
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radiology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Paul Martel
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Chantal Rohner
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Leonie Heym
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Frederic Duclos
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Véronique Vallet
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Fernanda Herrera
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
- Ludwig Cancer Research Center Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strojan P, Kokalj M, Plavc G, Ng SP, Nuyts S, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Eisbruch A, de Bree R, Chow JCH, Mäkitie AA, Lopez F, Saba NF, Ferlito A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Curative Treatment for De Novo Mucosal Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Feasible Alternative Option for Fragile Patients with Small Lesion: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2096. [PMID: 38893215 PMCID: PMC11171035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by a high dose per fraction, well-defined small targets, superior dose conformity, and a steep off-target dose gradient. A literature search was conducted to examine the experience with SBRT as a curative treatment for newly diagnosed mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck (MCHN). Four retrospective case series and one prospective phase I clinical trial published between 2012 and 2020 described 124 patients. SBRT was mainly performed in older patients with different tumor sites. The median size of the planning target volumes ranged from 5.3 to 41 cm3. Different approaches were used to create margins. In two studies, limited elective nodal irradiation was performed. The equivalent doses used were 60-83.33 Gy delivered in five fractions. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the radiation dose specification. The incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 0-8.3%, with local and regional control ranging from 73% to 100%. Improved or stable quality of life after SBRT was reported in two studies. Curative-intent SBRT for de novo MCHN appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment for small tumor targets, preferably without concomitant elective tissue irradiation. Standardization of SBRT practice and well-designed prospective clinical trials are needed to better define the role of SBRT in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (M.K.); (G.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Marko Kokalj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (M.K.); (G.P.)
| | - Gaber Plavc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (M.K.); (G.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Carlos M. Chiesa-Estomba
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain;
- Biodonostia Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Deusto University, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - James C. H. Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China;
| | - Antti A. Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Fernando Lopez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), 33011 Oviedo, Spain;
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, 33011 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Nabil F. Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA;
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35125 Padua, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hurwitz JC, Haas J, Mendez C, Sanchez A, Santos VF, Akerman M, Carpenter T, Tam M, Katz A, Corcoran A, Mahadevan A, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Lischalk JW. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Ultralarge (≥100 cc) Glands. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:241-251. [PMID: 37984713 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Historically, toxicity concerns have existed in patients with large prostate glands treated with radiation therapy, particularly brachytherapy. There are questions whether this risk extends to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In this retrospective review, we examine clinical outcomes of patients with prostate glands ≥100 cc treated curatively with SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed a large institutional database to identify patients with histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer in glands ≥100 cc, who were treated with definitive-robotic SBRT. Prostate volume (PV) was determined by treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging. Toxicity was measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Many patients received the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Quality of Life questionnaires. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 2 years. RESULTS Seventy-one patients were identified with PV ≥100 cc. Most had grade group (GG) 1 or 2 (41% and 37%, respectively) disease. All patients received a total dose of 3500 to 3625 cGy in 5 fractions. A minority (27%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was used for gland size downsizing in only 10% of cases. Nearly half (45%) were taking GU medications for urinary dysfunction before RT. Median toxicity FU was 4.0 years. Two-year rates of grade 1+ genitourinary (GU), grade 1+ gastrointestinal (GI), and grade 2+ GU toxicity were 43.5%, 15.9%, and 30.4%, respectively. Total grade 3 GU toxicities were very limited (2.8%). There were no grade 3 GI toxicities. On logistic regression analysis, pretreatment use of GU medications was significantly associated with increased rate of grade 2+ GU toxicity (odds ratio, 3.19; P = .024). Furthermore, PV (analyzed as a continuous variable) did not have an effect on toxicity, quality of life, or oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS With early FU, ultra large prostate glands do not portend increased risk of high-grade toxicity after SBRT but likely carry an elevated risk of low-grade GU toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua C Hurwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York
| | - Jonathan Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Astrid Sanchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Vianca F Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Meredith Akerman
- Division of Health Services Research, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Todd Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Moses Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Aaron Katz
- Department of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Anthony Corcoran
- Department of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, New York
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Galienne M, Risbourg S, Lacornerie T, Taillez A, Lartigau E, Barthoulot M, Pasquier D. Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate Cancer: Efficacy and late urinary toxicity according to transurethral resection of the prostate history. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100779. [PMID: 38681137 PMCID: PMC11047194 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic alternative for localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Despite the availability of several studies, the toxicity profile of SBRT has not been comprehensively described. This real-world evidence study assessed the efficacy and toxicities associated with this regimen, and potential prognosis factors for genitourinary toxicities. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with CyberKnife™ SBRT, as primary irradiation, at the Oscar Lambret Center between 2010 and 2020. The prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE (version 5.0). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (cBR) was estimated using the Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Results Among the included patients, 13.5 % had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The median follow-up was 48 months. At 5 years, bRFS, cBR, and OS were 72 % (95 %CI: 61-81), 7 % (95 %CI: 3-14), and 82 % (95 %CI: 73-89), respectively. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one late toxicity of grade ≥ 2; genitourinary (N = 29), including 3 cases of chronic hematuria, and/or gastrointestinal (N = 1). The cumulative incidence of late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was 20.6 % at 5 years (95 %CI: 13.9-28.1). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of TURP was significantly associated with late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2, after adjusting for clinical target volume (Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05-8.86; P = 0.04). Conclusion Extreme hypofractionated SBRT is effective for localized prostate cancer with a low risk of late toxicity. A history of TURP is associated with a higher risk of late urinary toxicity. These findings may contribute to the optimal management of patients treated with this regimen, particularly those with a history of TURP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Galienne
- University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital (South Site), Amiens, France
| | - Séverine Risbourg
- Department of Methodology and Biostatistics, Oscar Lambret Center, Clinical Research and Innovation Directorate, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Eric Lartigau
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
- University of Lille & CRIStAL (Research Center in Computer Science, Signal and Automatic Control of Lille ((UMR 9189), Lille, France
| | - Maël Barthoulot
- Department of Methodology and Biostatistics, Oscar Lambret Center, Clinical Research and Innovation Directorate, Lille, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
- University of Lille & CRIStAL (Research Center in Computer Science, Signal and Automatic Control of Lille ((UMR 9189), Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kedves A, Akay M, Akay Y, Kisiván K, Glavák C, Miovecz Á, Schiffer Á, Kisander Z, Lőrincz A, Szőke A, Sánta B, Freihat O, Sipos D, Kovács Á, Lakosi F. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging diffusion parameters using artificial intelligence in low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: A pilot study. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:986-994. [PMID: 38678978 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the predictive value of the pre-treatment diffusion parameters of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) using artificial intelligence (AI) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS Retrospective evaluation was performed for 30 patients using pre-treatment multi-parametric MR image datasets between 2017 and 2021. MR-based mean- and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCmean, ADCmin) were calculated for the intraprostatic dominant lesion. Therapeutic response was assessed using PSA levels. Predictive performance was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Statistics performed with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS No biochemical relapse was detected after a median follow-up of twenty-three months (range: 3-50), with a median PSA of 0.01 ng/ml (range: 0.006-2.8) at the last examination. Significant differences were observed between the pre-treatment ADCmean, ADCmin parameters, and the group averages of patients with low and high 1-year-PSA measurements (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). In prediction, the random forest (RF) model outperformed the decision tree (DT) and support vector machine (SVM) models by yielding area under the curves (AUC), with 0.722, 0.685, and 0.5, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that pre-treatment MR diffusion data may predict therapeutic response using the novel approach of machine learning in PCa patients treated with SABR. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Clinicians shall measure and implement the evaluation of the suggested parameters (ADCmin, ADCmean) to provide the most accurate therapy for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kedves
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - M Akay
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Akay
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K Kisiván
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - C Glavák
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Á Miovecz
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Á Schiffer
- Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Z Kisander
- Department of Electrical Networks, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - A Lőrincz
- Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - A Szőke
- 3D Printing and Visualization Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - B Sánta
- Röntgenpraxis Dr. Thomas Trieb, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - O Freihat
- College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - D Sipos
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Á Kovács
- Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - F Lakosi
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee J, Nandalur S, Hazy A, Al-Katib S, Kim K, Ye H, Kolderman N, Dhaliwal A, Krauss D, Quinn T, Marvin K, Nandalur KR. Prostatic Urethral Length on MRI Potentially Predicts Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiation. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1950-1958. [PMID: 37858506 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of our study was to evaluate pretreatment prostate quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements and clinical characteristics in predicting genitourinary (GU) toxicity after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent MRI within 6 months before completing definitive RT and follow-up information in our GU toxicity database from June 2016 to February 2023. MRI measurements included quantitative urethra, prostate, and bladder measurements. GU toxicity was physician-scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) with acute toxicity defined as ≤180 days and late defined as >180 days. Multivariable logistic regression model was constructed for grade ≥2 acute toxicity and Cox proportional hazards regression for late toxicity, adjusted for clinical factors and RT method. RESULTS A total of 361 men (median age 68 years, interquartile range [IQR] 62-73) were included; 14.4% (50/347) men experienced grade ≥2 acute toxicity. Brachytherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-5.8), P < 0.01) was associated with increased odds of acute GU toxicity, and longer MUL (OR: 0.41 [95%CI: 0.18-0.92], P = 0.03) with decreased odds. Median follow-up for late toxicity was 15.0 months (IQR: 9.0-28.0) with approximately 88.7% and 72.0% patients free of toxicity at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Only longer prostatic urethral length (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6, 95%CI: 1.2-2.1, P < 0.01) was associated with increased risk of late GU toxicity, notably urinary frequency/urgency symptoms (HR: 1.7 [95%CI: 1.3-2.3], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Longer prostatic urethral length measured on prostate MRI is independently associated with higher risk of developing late grade ≥2 GU toxicity after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. This pretreatment metric may be potentially valuable in risk-stratification models for quality of life following prostate RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Sirisha Nandalur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Allison Hazy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Sayf Al-Katib
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.)
| | - Kyu Kim
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Hong Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Nathan Kolderman
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.)
| | - Abhay Dhaliwal
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.)
| | - Daniel Krauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Thomas Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Kimberly Marvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.)
| | - Kiran R Nandalur
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.).
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shah S, Saravanakumar S, Conroy D, Sowmiyanarayanan S, Singh R, Pepin A, Rashid H, Danner MT, Krishnan P, Lei S, Rashid A, Suy S, Kataria S, Aghdam N, Collins S. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Men With Hip Prostheses: A Cautionary Note. Cureus 2024; 16:e61432. [PMID: 38947568 PMCID: PMC11214744 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for prostate cancer. SBRT requires high accuracy to reduce treatment margins. Metal hip prostheses create artifacts that distort pelvic imaging and potentially decrease the accuracy of target/organ at risk (OAR) identification and radiation dose calculations. Data on the safety and efficacy of SBRT after hip replacement is limited. This single-institution study sought to evaluate the safety and local control following SBRT for prostate cancer in men with hip replacements. METHODS 23 patients treated with localized prostate cancer and a history of pre-treatment hip replacement, treated with SBRT from 2007 to 2017 at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. Treatment was administered with the CyberKnife® (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA) at doses of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. The targets and OARs were identified and contoured by a single experienced Radiation Oncologist (SPC). The adequacy of the CT and T2W MRI images for treatment planning was assessed with a three-point scale (good, adequate, or suboptimal). During treatment planning, care was taken to avoid treatment beams that directly traversed the hip prosthesis. Toxicities were recorded and scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v.4.0). Local recurrence was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and/or prostate biopsy. RESULTS The median follow-up was seven years. The patients were elderly (median age = 71 years) with a high rate of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 2 in 25%). Four patients had bilateral hip replacements. The majority of patients were low to intermediate risk per the D'Amico classification. Around 13% received upfront ADT. In total, 13 patients were treated with 35 Gy, and 10 were treated with 36.25 Gy. The rates of late > Grade 3 GU toxicity and > Grade 2 GI toxicity were 8.6% and 4.3%, respectively. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Six patients (26%) developed a local recurrence at a median time of 7.5 years. Of these six patients, four had unilateral hip replacements and two had bilateral. Three underwent salvage cryotherapy and three received salvage ADT. CONCLUSIONS In the general population, high-grade toxicities and local recurrences are uncommon following prostate SBRT. However, in this cohort of patients with prior hip replacements, prostate SBRT had higher than expected rates of late toxicity and local recurrence. In the opinion of the authors, such patients should be counseled regarding an elevated risk of late toxicity and local recurrence with prostate SBRT. With its ultrasound guidance, brachytherapy would have the advantage of circumventing the need for MRI/CT-based imaging and thus may represent a preferable radiation alternative in this patient population. If these patients are treated with SBRT, they should be monitored closely for local recurrence so early salvage can be performed. We hope that recent advances in metal artifact reduction techniques and dose-calculation algorithms will improve future outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Shah
- Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | | | - Dylan Conroy
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | | | - Rahul Singh
- College of Arts and Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Abigail Pepin
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Harris Rashid
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Malika T Danner
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Pranay Krishnan
- Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Abdul Rashid
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Simeng Suy
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Shaan Kataria
- Radiation Oncology, Arlington Radiation Oncology, Reston, USA
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Sean Collins
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sawayanagi S, Yamashita H, Ogita M, Kawai T, Sato Y, Kume H. In Curative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer, There Is a High Possibility That 45 Gy in Five Fractions Will Not Be Tolerated without a Hydrogel Spacer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1472. [PMID: 38672553 PMCID: PMC11048095 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer. This study was a phase 1 dose escalation trial conducted in Japan. Patients with histologically proven prostate cancer without lymph nodes or distant metastases were enrolled. The prescribed doses were 42.5, 45, or 47.5 Gy in five fractions. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade (G) 3+ gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity within 180 days after SBRT completion, and a 6 plus 6 design was used as the method of dose escalation. A total of 16 patients were enrolled, with 6 in the 42.5 Gy group and 10 in the 45 Gy group. No DLT was observed in the 42.5 Gy group. In the 45 Gy group, one patient experienced G3 rectal hemorrhage, and another had G4 rectal perforation, leading to the determination of 42.5 Gy as the MTD. None of the patients experienced biochemical recurrence or death during the follow-up period. We concluded that SBRT for non-metastatic prostate cancer at 42.5 Gy in five fractions could be safely performed, but a total dose of 45 Gy increased severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subaru Sawayanagi
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (S.S.); (M.O.)
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (S.S.); (M.O.)
| | - Mami Ogita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (S.S.); (M.O.)
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.S.); (H.K.)
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.S.); (H.K.)
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, 2-8-29, Musashidai, Fuchu 183-8524, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (T.K.); (Y.S.); (H.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kobayashi H, Eriguchi T, Tanaka T, Ogata T, Osaki N, Suzuki H, Kosugi M, Kumabe A, Sato K, Ishida M. An optimal method of hydrogel spacer insertion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2024; 42:406-414. [PMID: 37932639 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01506-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore an ideal method for hydrogel spacer insertion by analyzing the efficacy and safety of our originally developed apex expansion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall, 100 patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy were included. A hydrogel spacer was inserted in 64 and 36 patients using the conventional and apex expansion methods, respectively. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum into the upper rectum, middle rectum, and lower rectum on the sagittal section of magnetic resonance imaging. We compared the dose to each part of the rectum between the two methods using dose-volume histograms. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity assessments were conducted until 3 months of follow-up. RESULTS The whole rectal dose in the apex expansion method group was lower than that in the conventional method group, which was significant in all dose regions (V5-V35). Similarly, in the apex expansion method group, the dose to the middle rectum was lower in the low- to high-dose region (V10-V35), and the dose to the lower rectum was lower in the middle- to high-dose region (V15-35). No Grade ≥ 3 toxicity or procedure-related complications were observed. Additionally, Grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities during the treatment showed no significant differences between the two methods. CONCLUSION The apex expansion method may be safe and effective in achieving a more efficient rectal dose reduction by expanding the anterior perirectal space in the prostatic apex area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
- Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
| | - Takahisa Eriguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomoki Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takeru Ogata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Noriko Osaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hideaki Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Michio Kosugi
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Kumabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kozo Sato
- Department of Radiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masaru Ishida
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Polizzi M, Weiss E, Jan N, Ricco A, Kim S, Urdaneta A, Rosu‐Bubulac M. Rectal deformation management with IGRT in prostate radiotherapy: Can it be managed with rigid alignment alone? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14241. [PMID: 38193605 PMCID: PMC11005986 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE It is challenging to achieve appropriate target coverage of the prostate with Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) while simultaneously constraining rectal doses within planned values when there is significant variability in rectal filling and shape. We investigated if rectum planning goals can be fulfilled using rigid CBCT-based on-board alignment to account for interfraction rectal deformations. METHODS Delivered rectal doses corresponding to prostate alignment ("PR") and anterior rectum alignment ("AR") for 239 daily treatments from 13 patients are reported. Rectal doses were estimated by rigidly mapping the planned dose on the daily CT derived from the daily CBCT according to respective alignment shifts. Rectum V95% (rV95%) was used for analyses. RESULTS Compared to "PR", "AR" alignment increased rV95% for an average of 34.4% across all patients. rV95% (cc) averaged over all fractions was significant from planning values for 10/13 patients for "PR" and for 9/13 for "AR". 3/13 patients had reproducible anatomy. Of patients with non-reproducible anatomy, three had dosimetrically more favorable, while seven had less favorable anatomies. Most shift differences (82.3%) between the "PR" and "AR" alignments larger than 2 mm resulted in rV95% changes larger than 2 cc. Most shift differences (82.2%) of 2 mm or less between the "PR" and "AR" alignments resulted in rV95% changes less than 2 cc. The average percentage of fractions among patients in which anterior or posterior shifts for "AR" and "PR" alignment was larger than the PTV margins was 9.1% (0.0%-37.5%) and 1.3% (0%-10%). CONCLUSION Rectal deformation and subsequent inconsistent interfraction separation between prostate and rectal wall translate into anatomical changes that cannot always be mitigated with rigid alignment. If systematic differences exist due to a non-reproducible planning anatomy, attempts to restore the planned rectal doses through anterior rectum alignment produce rather small improvements and may result in unacceptable target underdosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Polizzi
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Nuzhat Jan
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Anthony Ricco
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Siyong Kim
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Alfredo Urdaneta
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Mihaela Rosu‐Bubulac
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
D'Agostino GR, Badalamenti M, Stefanini S, Baldaccini D, Franzese C, Faro LL, Di Cristina L, Vernier V, Reggiori G, Scorsetti M. Long term update on toxicity and survival of a phase II trial of linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:368-375. [PMID: 38112222 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016 we published a phase II study exploring safety and efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) delivered with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams techniques in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We present herein the updated results on late toxicity and long-term survival. METHODS Patients enrolled in the study had a biopsy-confirmed localized PC and the features of a low- or intermediate-risk disease (National Comprehensive Network Criteria). The radiotherapy (RT) schedule consisted of 35 Gy delivered in five fractions every other day. Toxicities were registered according to the common toxicity adverse events v4.0. Biochemical recurrence was defined as an increase of prostate specific antigen after nadir, confirmed at least once. Local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases were detected either with Choline- or PSMA-PET/CT scans. Kaplan-Meier curves for Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival (BFS), Local Control (LC), Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS) and Cancer Specific Survival, were calculated by using MedCalc. RESULTS Ninety patients were submitted to SBRT between February 2012 and March 2015. Fifty-eight patients (64.5%) had a Gleason Score of 6, while 32 (35.5%) had a Gleason Score of 7. A late grade 1 Genito-Urinary toxicity was observed in 54.5% of patients while a grade 2 in 3.3%. A late Gastro-intestinal grade 1 toxicity was reported in 18.9% of patients, while a grade 2 in 2.2%. Erectile dysfunction was reported by 13% of patients No heavier toxicities were observed. At a median follow-up of 102 months, 5- and 8-year BFS were 93.0% and 84.4% respectively, 5- and 8-year LC were 95.2% and 87.0% respectively, 5- and 8-year DMFS were 95.3% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This long-term update confirms that SBRT is a valid therapeutic strategy for low-intermediate risk PC. RT with VMAT and FFF warrants optimal results in terms of toxicity and disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe R D'Agostino
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Badalamenti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Stefanini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Baldaccini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Lo Faro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Di Cristina
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ma TM, Ladbury C, Tran M, Keiper TD, Andraos T, Gogineni E, Mohideen N, Siva S, Loblaw A, Tree AC, Cheung P, Kresl J, Collins S, Cao M, Kishan AU. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e117-e131. [PMID: 37661040 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) involved lengthy courses with low daily doses. However, advancements in radiation delivery and a better understanding of prostate radiobiology have enabled the development of shorter courses of EBRT. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy, administering doses greater than 5 Gy per fraction, is now considered a standard of care regimen for localized PCa, particularly for intermediate-risk disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a specific type of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy employing advanced planning, imaging, and treatment technology to deliver in five or fewer fractions, is gaining prominence as a cost-effective, convenient, and safe alternative to longer radiotherapy courses. It is crucial to address practical considerations related to patient selection, fractionation scheme, target delineation, and planning objectives. This is especially important in challenging clinical situations where clear evidence for guidance may be lacking. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide with the aim of providing a practical framework for delivering SBRT to the intact prostate, exemplified by two case studies. The article will explore common SBRT dose/fractionation schemes and dose constraints for organs-at-risk. Additionally, it will review existing evidence and expert opinions on topics such as SBRT dose escalation, the use of rectal spacers, the role of androgen deprivation therapy in the context of SBRT, SBRT in special patient populations (e.g., high-risk disease, large prostate, high baseline urinary symptom burdens, and inflammatory bowel disease), as well as new imaging-guidance techniques like Magnetic Resonance Imaging for SBRT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Maxwell Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Timothy D Keiper
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Therese Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Najeeb Mohideen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Community Hospital, Arlington Heights, Illinois
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Kresl
- Phoenix CyberKnife and Radiation Oncology Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fink CA, Buchele C, Baumann L, Liermann J, Hoegen P, Ristau J, Regnery S, Sandrini E, König L, Rippke C, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Debus J, Koerber SA, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Dosimetric benefit of online treatment plan adaptation in stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1308406. [PMID: 38425342 PMCID: PMC10902126 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1308406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Apart from superior soft tissue contrast, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers the chance for daily online plan adaptation. This study reports on the comparison of dose parameters before and after online plan adaptation in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer. Materials and methods 32 consecutive patients treated with ultrahypofractionated SBRT for localized prostate cancer within the prospective SMILE trial underwent a planning process for MR-guided radiotherapy with 37.5 Gy applied in 5 fractions. A base plan, derived from MRI simulation at an MRIdian Linac, was registered to daily MRI scans (predicted plan). Following target and OAR recontouring, the plan was reoptimized based on the daily anatomy (adapted plan). CTV and PTV coverage and doses at OAR were compared between predicted and adapted plans using linear mixed regression models. Results In 152 out of 160 fractions (95%), an adapted radiation plan was delivered. Mean CTV and PTV coverage increased by 1.4% and 4.5% after adaptation. 18% vs. 95% of the plans had a PTV coverage ≥95% before and after online adaptation, respectively. 78% vs. 100% of the plans had a CTV coverage ≥98% before and after online adaptation, respectively. The D0.2cc for both bladder and rectum were <38.5 Gy in 93% vs. 100% before and after online adaptation. The constraint at the urethra with a dose of <37.5 Gy was achieved in 59% vs. 93% before and after online adaptation. Conclusion Online adaptive plan adaptation improves target volume coverage and reduces doses to OAR in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer. Online plan adaptation could potentially further reduce acute and long-term side effects and improve local failure rates in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph A. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Baumann
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Side Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Side Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A. Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
De Bari B, Guibert G, Slimani S, Bashar Y, Risse T, Guisolan N, Trouillot J, Abel J, Weber P. Electromagnetic Transmitter-Based Prostate Gating for Dose-Escalated Linac-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An Evaluation of Intrafraction Motion. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:962-974. [PMID: 38392066 PMCID: PMC10887766 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is as a standard treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Tight margins and high dose gradients are needed, and the precise localization of the target is mandatory. Our retrospective study reports our experience regarding the evaluation of intrafraction prostate motion during LINAC-based SBRT evaluated with a novel electromagnetic (EM) tracking device. This device consists of an integrated Foley catheter with a transmitter connected to a receiver placed on the treatment table. METHODS We analyzed 31 patients who received LINAC-based SBRT using flattening filter-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The patients were scheduled to be treated for primary (n = 27) or an intraprostatic recurrent PCa (n = 4). A simulation CT scan was conducted while the patients had a filled bladder (100-150 cc) and an empty rectum, and an EM tracking device was used. The same rectal and bladder conditions were employed during the treatment. The patients received 36.25 Gy delivered over five consecutive fractions on the whole prostate and 40 Gy on the nodule(s) visible via MRI, both delivered with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost approach. The CTV-to-PTV margin was 2 mm for both the identified treatment volumes. Patient positioning was verified with XVI ConeBeam-CT (CBCT) matching before each fraction. When the signals exceeded a 2 mm threshold in any of the three spatial directions, the treatment was manually interrupted. A new XVI CBCT was performed if this offset lasted >20 s. RESULTS We analyzed data about 155 fractions. The median and mean treatment times, calculated per fraction, were 10 m31 s and 12 m44 s (range: 6 m36 s-65 m28 s), and 95% of the fractions were delivered with a maximum time of 27 m48 s. During treatment delivery, the mean and median number of XVI CBCT operations realized during the treatment were 2 and 1 (range: 0-11). During the treatment, the prostate was outside the CTV-to-PTV margin (2 mm), thus necessitating the stoppage of the delivery +/- a reacquisition of the XVI CBCT for 11.2%, 8.9%, and 3.9% of the delivery time in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral direction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We easily integrated an EM-transmitter-based gating for prostate LINAC-based SBRT into our normal daily workflow. Using this system, a 2 mm CTV-to-PTV margin could be safely applied. A small number of fractions showed a motion exceeding the predefined 2 mm threshold, which would have otherwise gone undetected without intrafraction motion management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland (N.G.)
| | - Geoffroy Guibert
- Medical Physics Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland
| | - Sabrine Slimani
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland (N.G.)
| | - Yanes Bashar
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland (N.G.)
| | - Terence Risse
- Medical Physics Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Guisolan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland (N.G.)
| | - Juliane Trouillot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland (N.G.)
| | - Jonathan Abel
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland (N.G.)
| | - Patrick Weber
- Medical Physics Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fond, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lischalk JW, Akerman M, Repka MC, Sanchez A, Mendez C, Santos VF, Carpenter T, Wise D, Corcoran A, Lepor H, Katz A, Haas JA. High-risk prostate cancer treated with a stereotactic body radiation therapy boost following pelvic nodal irradiation. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1325200. [PMID: 38410097 PMCID: PMC10895712 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1325200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Modern literature has demonstrated improvements in long-term biochemical outcomes with the use of prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. However, this comes at the cost of increased treatment-related toxicity. In this study, we explore the outcomes of the largest cohort to date, which uses a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost following pelvic nodal radiation for exclusively high-risk prostate cancer. Methods and materials A large institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients with high-risk clinical node-negative prostate cancer treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to the pelvis followed by a robotic SBRT boost to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The boost was uniformly delivered over three fractions. Toxicity was measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Oncologic outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were created to evaluate associations between pretreatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 440 patients with a median age of 71 years were treated, the majority of whom were diagnosed with a grade group 4 or 5 disease. Pelvic nodal irradiation was delivered at a total dose of 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions, followed by a three-fraction SBRT boost. With an early median follow-up of 2.5 years, the crude incidence of grade 2+ genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was 13% and 11%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed grade 2+ GU toxicity was associated with older age and a higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. Multivariate analysis revealed overall survival was associated with patient age and posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir. Conclusion Utilization of an SBRT boost following pelvic nodal irradiation in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer is oncologically effective with early follow-up and yields minimal high-grade toxicity. We demonstrate a 5-year freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBCR) of over 83% with correspondingly limited grade 3+ GU and GI toxicity measured at 3.6% and 1.6%, respectively. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate oncologic outcomes and late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - Meredith Akerman
- Division of Health Services Research, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Michael C. Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Astrid Sanchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - Christopher Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - Vianca F. Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - Todd Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - David Wise
- Department of Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health - Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Anthony Corcoran
- Department of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Aaron Katz
- Department of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan A. Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hu HP, Anagnostopoulos G, Gouran-Savadkoohi M, Dayes I, Ishkanian A, Hallock A, Lukka H, Quan K, Schnarr K, Cuthbert D, Goldberg M, Chang YM, Tsakiridis T. Disease control outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy or moderate hypo-fractionation for prostate cancer: Real-world experience at two Canadian centers. Prostate 2024; 84:193-202. [PMID: 37880911 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advantages of using stereotactic body radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer include short treatment times, decreased costs, and limited toxicity. Randomized trial outcomes comparing 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy or hypo-fractionated radiation therapy are pending. OBJECTIVE We report the 10-year experience with 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy at two Canadian centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone (35-40 Gy in 5 fractions) or hypo-fractionated radiation therapy alone (60-62 Gy in 20 fractions) in the period of July 2010 and June 2020. The biochemical relapse-free survival, PSA nadir, interval time to PSA nadir, time to biochemical recurrence (2 ng/ml above PSA nadir) and overall survival were reviewed. Outcomes between treatment groups were compared after propensity-matching by patient baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess biochemical relapse-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS We identified 205 and 513 patients with low or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy or hypo-fractionation, respectively. Intermediate-risk category composed 81% and 95% of the stereotactic body radiation therapy and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy cohorts, respectively. After a median follow up of 58.6 months for the stereotactic body radiation therapy cohort and 45.0 months for the hypo-fractionated cohort, biochemical relapse-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between treatment groups. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates were 92.1% and 93.6% and overall survival rates were 96.4% and 95.0% for the stereotactic body radiation therapy and hypo-fractionated cohorts, respectively, after propensity-matching. Stereotactic body radiation therapy resulted in a significantly lower PSA nadir (0.18 ng/ml) compared to hypo-fractionated radiation therapy (0.48 ng/ml) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Mean time to biochemical recurrence was not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiation therapy is an effective treatment option for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer with encouraging biochemical relapse-free survival and overall survival rates comparable with hypo-fractionated radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Pei Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Ian Dayes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adrian Ishkanian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, Niagara Health System, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abhirami Hallock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, Niagara Health System, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Himanshu Lukka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kimmen Quan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kara Schnarr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Cuthbert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, Niagara Health System, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mira Goldberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yi Meng Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Theodoros Tsakiridis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, Niagara Health System, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Slama Y, Baumont G, Arcambal A, Begue M, Maillot O, Sayah R, Castanet R, Caboche R, Liberati P, Slaoui H, Bouaziz M, Borson O, Nguyen NP, Dutheil F. Retrospective study on the toxicity induced by stereotactic body radiotherapy: overview of the reunion experience on prostate cancer in elderly patients. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1302001. [PMID: 38361775 PMCID: PMC10867626 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1302001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer among men worldwide. Various tools are used to manage disease such as conventional radiotherapy. However, it has been demonstrated that large prostate volumes were often associated with higher rates of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities. Currently, the improvements in radiotherapy technology have led to the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy, which delivers higher and much more accurate radiation doses. In order to complete literature data about short-term outcome and short-term toxic effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy, we aimed to share our experience about gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer in patients over 70 years old. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of elderly patients with prostate cancer treated between 2021 and 2022. The elderly patients were treated with a non-coplanar robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy platform using real-time tracking of implanted fiducials. The prostate, with or without part of the seminal vesicles, was treated with a total dose of 36.25 Gy delivered in five fractions, each fraction being administered every other day. Results We analyzed a total of 80 elderly patients, comprising 38 low-, 37 intermediate- and 5 high-risk patients. The median follow-up duration was 12 months. We did not observe biochemical/clinical recurrence, distant metastasis, or death. Grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity was observed in 9 patients (11.25%) and Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity in 4 patients (5.0%). We did not observe any grade 3 or more acute or late toxicities. Conclusion Over the follow-up period, we noted a low frequency of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities induced by stereotactic body radiotherapy in the context of prostate cancer in elderly patients. Therefore, stereotactic body radiotherapy seems to represent a promising treatment option for elderly patients, with acceptable acute toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Slama
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Gilles Baumont
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Angelique Arcambal
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Mickael Begue
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Olivier Maillot
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Rima Sayah
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Romain Castanet
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Raoul Caboche
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Urology, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Pedro Liberati
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Urology, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Hakim Slaoui
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Urology, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Medi Bouaziz
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Urology, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Olivier Borson
- Cabinet de Radiologie Les Alizés, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Nam P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, College of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Fabien Dutheil
- Clinique Sainte-Clotilde, Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe Clinifutur, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lilleby W, Kishan A, Geinitz H. Acute and long-term toxicity in primary hypofractionated external photon radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:41. [PMID: 38244053 PMCID: PMC10799812 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04714-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compelling evidence exists for the iso-effectiveness and safety of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT) schedules [1, 2]. However, international guidelines are not congruent regarding recommendation of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF-RT) to all risk groups. METHODS The current review gives an overview of clinically relevant toxicity extracted from major randomized controlled trials (RCT) trials comparing conventional to hypofractionated regimes in the primary setting of external photon radiation. Functional impairments are reported by using physician-rated and patient-reported scores using validated questionnaires. RESULTS The uncertain radiobiology of the urethra/bladder when applying extreme hypofractionation may have contributed to worse acute urinary toxicity score in the Scandinavian UHF-RT and worse subacute toxicity in PACE-B. The observed trend of increased acute GI toxicity in several moderate Hypo-RT trials and one UHF-RT trial, the Scandinavian Hypo-RT PC trial, could be associated to the different planning margins and radiation dose schedules. CONCLUSION Nevertheless, Hypo-RT has gained ground for patients with localized PCa and further improvements may be achieved by inclusion of genetically assessed radiation sensitivity. Several RCTs in Hypo-RT have shown non-inferior outcome and well-tolerated treatment toxicity by physician-rated scores. In the future, we suggest that toxicity should be measured by patient-reported outcome (PRO) using comparable questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amar Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hans Geinitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the Barmherzigen Schwestern, Ordensklinikum, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pham J, Neilsen BK, Liu H, Cao M, Yang Y, Sheng K, Ma TM, Kishan AU, Ruan D. Dosimetric predictors for genitourinary toxicity in MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Substructure with fraction-wise analysis. Med Phys 2024; 51:612-621. [PMID: 38055353 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) systems provide superior soft tissue contrast than x-ray based systems and can acquire real-time cine for treatment gating. These features allow treatment planning margins to be reduced, allowing for improved critical structure sparing and reduced treatment toxicity. Despite this improvement, genitourinary (GU) toxicity continues to affect many patients. PURPOSE (1) To identify dosimetric predictors, potentially in combination with clinical parameters, of GU toxicity following SBRT by leveraging MRgRT to accurately monitor daily dose, beyond predicted dose calculated during planning. (2) Improve awareness of toxicity-sensitive bladder substructures, specifically the trigone and urethra. METHODS Sixty-nine prostate cancer patients (NCT04384770 clinical trial) were treated on a ViewRay MRIdian MRgRT system, with 40 Gy prescribed to 95% of the PTV in over five fractions. Overall, 17 (24.6%) prostate patients reported acute grade 2 GU toxicity. The CTV, PTV, bladder, bladder wall, trigone, urethra, rectum, and rectal wall were contoured on the planning and daily treatment MRIs. Planning and daily treatment DVHs (0.1 Gy increments), organ doses (min, max, mean), and organ volumes were recorded. Daily dose was estimated by transferring the planning dose distributions to the daily MRI based on the daily setup alignment. Patients were partitioned into a training (55) and testing set (14). Dose features were pre-filtered using a t-test followed by maximum relevance minimum redundancy (MRMR) algorithm. Logistic regression was investigated with regularization to select dosimetric predictors. Specifically, two approaches: time-group least absolute shrinkage and selection (LASSO), and interactive grouped greedy algorithm (IGA) were investigated. Shared features across the planning and five treatment fractions were grouped to encourage consistency and stability. The conventional flat non-temporally grouped LASSO was also evaluated to provide a solid benchmark. After feature selection, a final logistic regression model was trained. Dosimetric regression models were compared to a clinical regression model with only clinical parameters (age, baseline IPSS, prostate gland size, ADT usage, etc.) and a hybrid model, combining the best performing dosimetric features with the clinical parameters, was evaluated. Final model performance was evaluated on the testing set using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity determined by the optimal threshold of the training set. RESULTS IGA had the best testing performance with an accuracy/sensitivity/specificity of 0.79/0.67/0.82, selecting 12 groups covering the bladder (V19.8 Gy, V20.5 Gy), bladder wall (19.7 Gy), trigone (15.9, 18.2, 43.3 Gy), urethra (V41.4 Gy, V41.7 Gy), CTV (V41.9 Gy), rectum (V8.5 Gy), and rectal wall (1.2, 44.1 Gy) dose features. Absolute bladder V19.8 Gy and V20.5 Gy were the most important features, followed by relative trigone 15.9 and 18.2 Gy. Inclusion of clinical parameters in the hybrid model with IGA did not significantly change regression performance. CONCLUSION Overall, IGA feature selection resulted in the best GU toxicity prediction performance. This exploratory study demonstrated the feasibility of identification and analysis of dosimetric toxicity predictors with awareness to sensitive substructures and daily dose to potentially provide consistent and stable dosimetric metrics to guide treatment planning. Further patient accruement is warranted to further assess dosimetric predictor and perform validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Pham
- Physics and Biology in Medicine Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Beth K Neilsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Hengjie Liu
- Physics and Biology in Medicine Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Physics and Biology in Medicine Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- SJTU-Ruijing-UIH Institute for Medical Imaging Technology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Physics and Biology in Medicine Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Panizza D, Faccenda V, Arcangeli S, De Ponti E. Treatment Optimization in Linac-Based SBRT for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Arc versus Dual-Arc Plan Comparison. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:13. [PMID: 38201441 PMCID: PMC10778084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to comprehensively present data on treatment optimization in linac-based SBRT for localized prostate cancer at a single institution. Moreover, the dosimetric quality and treatment efficiency of single-arc (SA) versus dual-arc (DA) VMAT planning and delivery approaches were compared. Re-optimization was performed on twenty low-to-intermediate-risk- (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions) and twenty high-risk (42.7 Gy in 7 fractions) prostate plans initially administered with the DA FFF-VMAT technique in 2021. An SA approach was adopted, incorporating new optimization parameters based on increased planning and clinical experience. Analysis included target coverage, organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, treatment delivery time, and the pre-treatment verification's gamma analysis-passing ratio. The SA optimization technique has consistently produced superior plans. Rectum and bladder mean doses were significantly reduced, and comparable target coverage and homogeneity were achieved in order to maintain a urethra protection strategy. The mean SA treatment delivery time was reduced by 22%; the mean monitor units increased due to higher plan complexity; and dose measurements demonstrated optimal agreement with calculations. The substantial reduction in treatment delivery time decreased the probability of prostate motion beyond the applied margins, suggesting potential decrease in treatment-related toxicity and improved target coverage in prostate SBRT. Further investigations are warranted to assess the long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Panizza
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (E.D.P.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
| | - Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (E.D.P.)
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (E.D.P.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ong WL, Loblaw A. The march toward single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer-Quo Vadimus? World J Urol 2023; 41:3485-3491. [PMID: 37921936 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04663-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for localized prostate cancer. There is increasing interest to reduce the number of fractions for prostate SBRT. METHODS We provide a narrative review and summary of prospective trials of different fractionation schedules for prostate SBRT, focusing on efficacy, toxicities, and quality of life outcomes. RESULTS There are two randomized phase 3 trials comparing standard external beam radiotherapy with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy. HYPO-RT-PC compared 78 Gy in 39 fractions vs 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (3D-CRT or IMRT) showing non-inferiority in 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival and equivalent tolerability. PACE-B trial compared 78 Gy in 39-fraction or 62 Gy in 20-fraction vs 36.25 Gy in 5-fraction prostate SBRT, with no significant differences in toxicity outcomes at 2 years. Five-year efficacy data for PACE-B are expected in 2024. Five-fraction prostate SBRT is currently the most common and well-established fractionation schedule with multiple prospective phase 2 trials published to date. There is more limited data on 1-4 fraction prostate SBRT. All fractionation schedules had acceptable toxicity outcomes. Experience from a high-dose-rate brachytherapy randomized trial showed inferior efficacy with single-fraction compared to two-fraction brachytherapy. Hence, caution should be applied in adopting single-fraction prostate SBRT. CONCLUSION Two-fraction SBRT is likely the shortest fractionation schedule that maintains the therapeutic ratio. Several randomized trials currently recruiting will likely provide us with more definite answers about whether two-fraction prostate SBRT should become a standard-of-care option. Enrollment of eligible patients into these trials should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Rm T2-161, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Rm T2-161, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zilli T, Jorcano S, Bral S, Symon Z, Rubio C, Bruynzeel AME, Ibrahimov R, Minn H, Oliveira A, Bertaut A, Constantin G, Miralbell R. Every-Other-Day Versus Once-a-Week Urethra-Sparing Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:791-798. [PMID: 37001763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to present the 5-year results from a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 randomized trial of every-other-day (EOD) versus once-a-week (QW) urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2012 and 2015, 170 patients with cT1c-3aN0M0 prostate cancer from 9 European institutions were randomized to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy/fraction to the urethra) delivered either EOD (arm A, n = 84) or QW (arm B, n = 86). The median follow-up was 78 months (interquartile range, 66-89 months) and 77 months (interquartile range, 66-82 months) for arms A and B, respectively. RESULTS Among the 165 patients treated and retained for the final analysis (arm A, n = 82; arm B, n = 83), acute toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 scale) was mild or absent, with no differences between arms. The 5-year grade 2 or greater genitourinary toxicity-free survival was 75.9% and 76.1% for arms A and B, respectively (P = .945), whereas the 5-year grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity-free survival was 89% and 92% for arms A and B, respectively (P = .596). No changes in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-PR25 scores were observed in both arms for genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual domains at 5-year follow-up compared with baseline. At the last follow-up, biochemical failure was observed in 14 patients in the EOD arm and in 7 patients in the QW arm, with a 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate of 92.2% and 93% for arms A and B, respectively (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a 10% dose reduction to urethra was associated with a minimal effect on urinary function and quality of life regardless of an EOD or QW fractionation schedule. Biochemical control so far has been encouraging and much alike in both study arms, although longer follow-up is probably needed to assess the true value of overall treatment time on disease outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.
| | - Sandra Jorcano
- Radiation Oncology, Teknon Oncologic Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Samuel Bral
- Radiation Oncology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Zvi Symon
- Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Carmen Rubio
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Ibrahimov
- Radiation Oncology, Neolife Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Heikki Minn
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Angelo Oliveira
- Radiation Oncology, Portuguese Institut of Oncology, Porto, Portugal
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Methodology and Biostatistics, Centre Georges-François-Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Raymond Miralbell
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, Teknon Oncologic Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Borzillo V, Scipilliti E, Pezzulla D, Serra M, Ametrano G, Quarto G, Perdonà S, Rossetti S, Pignata S, Crispo A, Di Gennaro P, D’Alesio V, Arrichiello C, Buonanno F, Mercogliano S, Russo A, Tufano A, Di Franco R, Muto P. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with CyberKnife ® System for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: clinical outcomes and toxicities of CyPro Trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1270498. [PMID: 38023175 PMCID: PMC10660677 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1270498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions with the CyberKnife System yields excellent control with low toxicity in low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. We found no differences in biochemical control and overall survival in relation to dose. There were no significant differences in toxicity or quality of life between the two groups. Aims Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging therapeutic approach for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We present retrospective data on biochemical control, toxicity, and quality of life of CyPro Trial. Materials and methods A total of 122 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with the CyberKnife System at a dose of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy in five fractions. Biochemical failure (BF)/biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was defined using the Phoenix method (nadir + 2 ng/ml). Acute/late rectal and urinary toxicities were assessed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scale. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and PR25. International Erectile Function Index-5 (IIEF5) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaires were administered at baseline, every 3 months after treatment during the first years, and then at 24 months and 36 months. Results The 1-, 2-, and 5-year DFS rates were 92.9%, 92.9%, and 92.3%, respectively, while the 1-, 2-, and 5-year bDFS rates were 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively. With regard to risk groups or doses, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of DFS or bDFS. Grade 2 urinary toxicity was acute in 10% and delayed in 2% of patients. No Grade 3 acute and late urinary toxicity was observed. Grade 2 rectal toxicity was acute in 8% and late in 1% of patients. No Grade 3-4 acute and late rectal toxicity was observed. Grade 2 acute toxicity appeared higher in the high-dose group (20% in the 36.25-Gy group versus 3% in the 35-Gy group) but was not statistically significant. Conclusion Our study confirms that SBRT of 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions with the CyberKnife System produces excellent control with low toxicity in patients with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We found no dose-related differences in biochemical control and overall survival. Further confirmation of these results is awaited through the prospective phase of this study, which is still ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Borzillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Esmeralda Scipilliti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Marcello Serra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ametrano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Quarto
- Department of Uro-Gynecological, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Uro-Gynecological, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Sabrina Rossetti
- Departmental Unit of Clinical and Experimental Uro-Andrologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Departmental Unit of Clinical and Experimental Uro-Andrologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Anna Crispo
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Piergiacomo Di Gennaro
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Valentina D’Alesio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Cecilia Arrichiello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Simona Mercogliano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Oncology, University “Federico II” of Naples, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Di Franco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Muto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nakamura K, Ikeda I, Inokuchi H, Aizawa R, Ogata T, Akamatsu S, Kobayashi T, Mizowaki T. Long-Term Outcomes of a Prospective Study on Highly Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer for 3 Weeks. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e530-e537. [PMID: 37414247 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reports of radiation therapy for prostate cancer using dose fractions between moderate hypofractionation and ultrahypofractionation are limited. This pilot study involved the application of highly hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in 15 fractions for 3 weeks and the number of fractions was intermediate between the 2 previously mentioned dose fractions. The long-term outcomes are reported. METHODS AND MATERIALS From April 2014 to September 2015, patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer received 54 Gy in 15 fractions (3.6 Gy per fraction) for 3 weeks using IMRT without intraprostatic fiducial markers or a rectal hydrogel spacer. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (HT) was administered for 4 to 8 months. Adjuvant HT was not administered to any patients. Rates of biochemical relapse-free survival, clinical relapse-free survival, overall survival, and the cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this prospective study; 24 of them were treated with highly hypofractionated IMRT (17% had low-risk and 83% had intermediate-risk disease). The median neoadjuvant HT duration was 5.3 months. The median follow-up period was 77 months (range, 57-87 months). Biochemical relapse-free survival, clinical relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates were 91.7%, 95.8%, and 95.8% at 5 years, and 87.5%, 86.3%, and 95.8% at 7 years, respectively. Neither grade ≥2 late gastrointestinal toxicity nor grade ≥3 late genitourinary toxicity was observed. The cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 genitourinary toxicity were 8.5% and 18.3% at 5 and 7 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Highly hypofractionated IMRT delivering 54 Gy in 15 fractions for 3 weeks for prostate cancer without intraprostatic fiducial markers facilitated favorable oncological outcomes without severe complications. This treatment approach may be a possible alternative to moderate hypofractionation, but further validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Itaru Ikeda
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy
| | - Haruo Inokuchi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy
| | - Rihito Aizawa
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy
| | - Takashi Ogata
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Morris BA, Holmes EE, Anger NJ, Cooley G, Schuster JM, Hurst N, Baschnagel AM, Bassetti MF, Blitzer GC, Chappell RJ, Bayliss RA, Morris ZS, Ritter MA, Floberg JM. Toxicity and Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Focal Boost to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Identified Prostate Cancer Lesions: Results of a Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:613-623. [PMID: 37179035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this prospective phase 2 trial, we investigated the toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the prostate gland and a simultaneous focal boost to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-identified intraprostatic lesions while also de-escalating dose to the adjacent organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients included low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score ≤7, prostate specific antigen ≤20, T stage ≤2b). SBRT was prescribed to 40 Gy in 5 fractions delivered every other day to the prostate, with any areas of high disease burden (MRI-identified prostate imaging reporting and data system 4 or 5 lesions) simultaneously escalated to 42.5 to 45 Gy and areas overlapping organs at risk (within 2 mm of urethra, rectum, and bladder) constrained to 36.25 Gy (n = 100). Patients without a pretreatment MRI or without MRI-identified lesions were treated to dose of 37.5 Gy with no focal boost (n = 14). RESULTS From 2015 to 2022, a total of 114 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 42 months. No acute or late grade 3+ gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was observed. One patient developed late grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity at 16 months. In patients treated with focal boost (n = 100), acute grade 2 GU and GI toxicity was seen in 38% and 4% of patients, respectively. Cumulative late grade 2+ GU and GI toxicities at 24 months were 13% and 5% respectively. Patient-reported outcomes showed no significant long-term change from baseline in urinary, bowel, hormonal, or sexual quality-of-life scores after treatment. CONCLUSIONS SBRT to a dose of 40 Gy to the prostate gland with a simultaneous focal boost up to 45 Gy is well tolerated with similar rates of acute and late grade 2+ GI and GU toxicity as seen in other SBRT regimens without intraprostatic boost. Moreover, no significant long-term changes were seen in patient-reported urinary, bowel, or sexual outcomes from pretreatment baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma E Holmes
- Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard J Chappell
- Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ong WL, Davidson M, Cheung P, Chung H, Chu W, Detsky J, Liu S, Morton G, Szumacher E, Tseng CL, Vesprini D, Ravi A, McGuffin M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Deabreu A, Kulasingham-Poon M, Loblaw A. Dosimetric correlates of toxicities and quality of life following two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109864. [PMID: 37619656 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no evidence-based data to guide dose constraints in two-fraction prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Using individual patient-data from two prospective trials, we aimed to correlate dosimetric parameters with toxicities and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 60 patients who had two-fraction prostate SABR in the 2STAR (NCT02031328) and 2SMART (NCT03588819) trials. The prescribed dose was 26 Gy to the prostate+/-32 Gy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesions. Toxicities and QoL data were prospectively collected using CTCAEv4 and EPIC-26 questionnaire. The outcomes evaluated were acute and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities, and late minimal clinical important changes (MCIC) in QoL domains. Dosimetric parameters for bladder, urethra, rectum, and penile bulb were evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up was 56 months (range: 39-78 months). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicities were 62%, 3%, and 17% respectively in the acute setting (<3 months), and 57%, 15%, and 52% respectively in late setting (>6 months). There were 36%, 28%, and 29% patients who had late MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL outcomes respectively. Bladder 0.5 cc was significant predictor for late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities, with optimal cut-off of 25.5 Gy. Penile bulb D5cc was associated of late grade ≥ 2 sexual toxicities (no optimal cut-off was identified). No dosimetric parameters were identified to be associated with other outcomes. CONCLUSION Using real-life patient data from prospective trials with medium-term follow-up, we identified additional dose constraints that may mitigate the risk of late treatment-related toxicities for two-fraction prostate SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Molli Surgical, Toronto, Canada
| | - Merrylee McGuffin
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gallagher L, Xiao J, Hsueh J, Shah S, Danner M, Zwart A, Ayoob M, Yung T, Simpson T, Fallick M, Kumar D, Leger P, Dawson NA, Suy S, Collins SP. Early biochemical outcomes following neoadjuvant/adjuvant relugolix with stereotactic body radiation therapy for intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1289249. [PMID: 37916156 PMCID: PMC10616590 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1289249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Injectable GnRH receptor agonists have been shown to improve cancer control when combined with radiotherapy. Prostate SBRT offers an abbreviated treatment course with comparable efficacy to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Relugolix is a new oral GnRH receptor antagonist which achieves rapid, sustained testosterone suppression. This prospective study sought to evaluate early testosterone suppression and PSA response following relugolix and SBRT for intermediate to high prostate cancer. Methods Relugolix was initiated at least 2 months prior to SBRT. Interventions to improve adherence were not utilized. PSA and total testosterone levels were obtained prior to and 1-4 months post SBRT. Profound castration was defined as serum testosterone ≤ 20 ng/dL. Early PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value within 4 months of completion of SBRT. Per prior trials, we examined the percentage of patients who achieved PSA level of ≤ 0.5 ng/mL and ≤ 0.2 ng/mL during the first 4 months post SBRT. Results Between July 2021 and January 2023, 52 men were treated at Georgetown with relugolix (4-6 months) and SBRT (36.25-40 Gy in 5 fractions) per an institutional protocol (IRB 12-1775). Median age was 71 years. 26.9% of patients were African American and 28.8% were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The median pretreatment PSA was 9.1 ng/ml. 67% of patients were ≥ Grade Group 3. 44 patients were intermediate- and 8 were high-risk. Patients initiated relugolix at a median of 3.6 months prior to SBRT with a median duration of 6.2 total months. 92.3% of patients achieved profound castration during relugolix treatment. Poor drug adherence was observed in 2 patients. A third patient chose to discontinue relugolix due to side effects. By post-SBRT month 4, 87.2% and 74.4% of patients achieved PSA levels ≤ 0.5 ng/ml and ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, respectively. Discussion Relugolix combined with SBRT allows for high rates of profound castration with low early PSA nadirs. We observed a 96% testosterone suppresion rate without the utilization of scheduled cues/reminders. This finding supports the notion that patients with localized prostate cancer can consistently and successfully follow an oral ADT protocol without daily reminders. Given relugolix's potential benefits over injectable GnRH receptor agonists, its usage may be preferred in specific patient populations (fear of needles, prior cardiovascular events). Future studies should focus on boundaries to adherence in specific underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Gallagher
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jerry Xiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jessica Hsueh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sarthak Shah
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Malika Danner
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Alan Zwart
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Marilyn Ayoob
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Thomas Yung
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Tiffany Simpson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mark Fallick
- Medical Science Department, Myovant Sciences, Inc, United States
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Paul Leger
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nancy A. Dawson
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Qureshy SA, Diven MA, Ma X, Marciscano AE, Hu JC, McClure TD, Barbieri C, Nagar H. Differential Use of Radiotherapy Fractionation Regimens in Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2337165. [PMID: 37815829 PMCID: PMC10565603 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Technical advances in treatment of prostate cancer and a better understanding of prostate cancer biology have allowed for hypofractionated treatment courses using a higher dose per fraction. Use of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has also been characterized. Objective To characterize US national trends of different RT fractionation schemes across risk groups of prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to characterize the fractionation regimens used for 302 035 patients diagnosed as having prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2020, who underwent definitive RT. The analysis was performed between February 1 and April 30, 2023. Exposure Stereotactic body RT or ultrahypofractionation, defined as 5 or fewer fractions of external beam RT (EBRT), moderate hypofractionation, defined as 20 to 28 fractions of EBRT, or conventional fractionation, defined as all remaining EBRT fractionation schemes. Main Outcomes and Measures Temporal trends and clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with SBRT, moderate hypofractionation, and conventional fractionation use. Results A total of 302 035 men receiving EBRT for localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2020 were identified (40.1% aged 60-69 years). Black patients comprised 17.6% of this cohort; White patients, 77.9%; and other races and ethnicities, 4.5%. Patients with low-risk disease comprised 17.5% of the cohort; favorable intermediate-risk disease, 23.5%; unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, 23.9%; and high-risk disease, 35.1%. Treatment consisted of conventional fractionation for 81.2%, moderate hypofractionation for 12.9%, and SBRT for 6.0%. The rate of increase over time in patients receiving SBRT compared with conventional fractionation was higher (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for 2005 vs 2004, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.04-4.94; P < .001]; AOR for 2020 vs 2004, 264.69 [95% CI, 179.33-390.68; P < .001]) than the rate of increase in patients receiving moderate hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation (AOR for 2005 vs 2004, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.98-1.12; P = .19]; AOR for 2020 vs 2004, 4.41 [95% CI, 4.15-4.69; P < .001]). Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive SBRT compared with conventional fractionation or moderate hypofractionation (AOR for conventional fractionation, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.80-0.89; P < .001]; AOR for moderate hypofractionation, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.72-0.81; P < .001]). Compared with 2019, patients treated with all fractionation regimens declined in 2020 by 24.4%. Conclusions and Relevance In this hospital-based cohort study of patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive EBRT, use of moderate hypofractionation and SBRT regimens for definitive prostate cancer treatment has increased from 2004 to 2020. Despite this increasing trend, findings suggest potential health care disparities for Black patients receiving EBRT for localized prostate cancer. The number of patients treated with EBRT in the year 2020 decreased, coinciding with official onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A. Qureshy
- currently a medical student at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marshall A. Diven
- New York Presbyterian-Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Xiaoyue Ma
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Ariel E. Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Jim C. Hu
- New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Tim D. McClure
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Leeman JE, Shin KY, Chen YH, Mak RH, Nguyen PL, D'Amico AV, Martin NE. Acute toxicity comparison of magnetic resonance-guided adaptive versus fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer 2023; 129:3044-3052. [PMID: 37485697 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining wider adoption for prostate cancer management but there remain significant toxicity risks when delivering prostate SBRT with standard techniques. Magnetic resonance-guided daily adaptive SBRT (MRg-A-SBRT) offers technological advantages in precision of radiation dose delivery, but the toxicity profile associated with MRg-A-SBRT compared to more standardly used fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate SBRT (CT-SBRT) remains unknown. METHODS A meta-analysis to compare acute toxicity rates associated with MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT for prostate cancer was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google Scholar were searched for prospective studies of prostate SBRT that were published between January 1, 2018 and August 31, 2022. Random effects and fixed effects models were used to estimate pooled toxicity rates, and meta-regression was performed to compare toxicity between MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT study groups. RESULTS Twenty-nine prospective studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 2547 patients. The pooled estimates for acute grade 2 or higher (G2+) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for MRg-A-SBRT were 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-24%) and 4% (95% CI, 2%-7%) and for CT-SBRT they were 28% (95% CI, 23%-33%) and 9% (95% CI, 6%-12%), respectively. On meta-regression, the odds ratios for acute G2+ GU and GI toxicities comparing MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.33-0.97, p = .04) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.17-0.96, p = .04), respectively. CONCLUSION MRg-A-SBRT is associated with a significantly reduced risk of acute G2+ GU or GI toxicity compared to CT-SBRT. Longer follow-up will be needed to evaluate late toxicity and disease control outcomes. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Magnetic resonance imaging-guided daily adaptive prostate stereotactic radiation (MRg-A-SBRT) is a treatment that may allow for delivery of prostate radiation more precisely than other radiotherapy techniques, but it is unknown whether this reduces side effects compared to standardly used computed tomography-guided SBRT (CT-SBRT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis combining data from 29 clinical trials including 2547 patients, it was found that the risk of short-term urinary side effects was reduced by 44% and the risk of short-term bowel side effects was reduced by 60% with MRg-A-SBRT compared to CT-SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kee-Young Shin
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yu-Hui Chen
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond H Mak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Neil E Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ahmed AR, Kalesinskas M, Kooper-Johnson S. Paraneoplastic autoimmune Laminin-332 syndrome (PALS): Anti-Laminin-332 mucous membrane pemphigoid as a prototype. Autoimmun Rev 2023; 22:103444. [PMID: 37673192 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Laminin-332 is an important component of the basement membrane. Recently, autoantibodies to Laminin-332 have been described in several autoimmune diseases. Many of these autoimmune diseases have a high incidence of malignancy. The importance of Laminin-332 autoantibodies and its relationship to malignancy is highlighted by using Laminin-332 Pemphigoid (LM-332Pg) as a prototype. OBJECTIVE To identify several autoimmune diseases that have autoantibodies to Laminin-332 present, and to determine the prevalence of malignancy in them. Using Laminin-332 Pemphigoid (LM-332Pg) as a prototype, to compare clinical profiles of LM-332Pg patients with and without cancer. By identifying the temporal detection of cancer, can the influence of autoantibodies to Laminin-332 on prognosis be determined. EVIDENCE REVIEW A literature search was conducted to identify autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in which autoantibodies to Laminin-332 were present. Subsequently, the rate of malignancy in these autoimmune diseases was determined. A search for publications on LM-332Pg patients to determine cancer rates and clinical outcomes to examine if a relationship can be proposed, was performed. FINDINGS Autoantibodies to Laminin-332 were detected in recent studies of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), psoriasis, bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), graft-vs-host disease (GVH), bullous pemphigoid (BP), lichen planus (LP), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), and membranous glomerulonephropathy (MGN). A high incidence of cancer rate was reported in these autoimmune diseases including primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), systemic sclerosis (SS), dermatomyositis (DM), multiple sclerosis (MS), immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data analysis demonstrated that LM-332Pg patients had a higher risk of developing ovarian, uterine, lung, gastric cancers and leukemia. The incidence for breast cancer was lower, when compared with global cancer rates. Patients diagnosed with cancer after the presence of LM-332Pg had higher rates of mortality and lower rates of remission, compared to those diagnosed with cancer prior to the discovery/diagnosis of LM-332Pg. When studied, levels of Laminin-332 autoantibodies correlated with the presence or absence of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Preliminary analysis suggests that autoantibodies to Laminin-332 are present in multiple autoimmune diseases, which also have a high incidence of malignancy. Detailed analysis of available data highlights that patients who developed LM-332Pg after cancer was diagnosed, had a more favorable prognosis, compared to patients who developed cancer when LM-332Pg was previously present. Preliminary data would suggest that autoantibodies to Laminin-332 could serve as an important biomarker in certain patients, for correlation with possible incidence of malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Razzaque Ahmed
- Department of Dermatology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA; Center for Blistering Diseases, Boston, MA 02135, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wolfe S, Diven MA, Marciscano AE, Zhou XK, Kishan AU, Steinberg ML, Miccio JA, Camilleri P, Nagar H. A randomized phase II trial of MR-guided prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy administered in 5 or 2 fractions for localized prostate cancer (FORT). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:923. [PMID: 37777738 PMCID: PMC10544147 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11430-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultra-hypofractionated regimens for definitive prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy are increasingly utilized due in part to promising safety and efficacy data complemented by greater patient convenience from a treatment course requiring fewer sessions. As such, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is rapidly emerging as a standard definitive treatment option for patients with localized PCa. The commercially available magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-LINAC) integrates MR imaging with radiation delivery, providing several theoretical advantages compared to computed tomography (CT)-guided radiotherapy. MR-LINAC technology facilitates improved visualization of the prostate, real-time intrafraction tracking of prostate and organs-at-risk (OAR), and online adaptive planning to account for target movement and anatomical changes. These features enable reduced treatment volume margins and improved sparing of surrounding OAR. The theoretical advantages of MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) have recently been shown to significantly reduce rates of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities as reported in the prospective randomized phase III MIRAGE trial, which compared MR-LINAC vs CT-based 5 fraction SBRT in patients with localized PCa (Kishan et al. JAMA Oncol 9:365-373, 2023). Thus, MR-LINAC SBRT-utilizing potentially fewer treatments-is warranted and clinically relevant for men with low or intermediate risk PCa electing for radiotherapy as definitive treatment. METHODS/DESIGN A total of 136 men with treatment naïve low or intermediate risk PCa will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 5 or 2 fractions of MR-guided SBRT using permuted block randomization. Randomization is stratified by baseline Expanded PCa Index Composite (EPIC) bowel and urinary domain scores. Patients undergoing 5 fractions will receive 37.5 Gy to the prostate over 10-14 days and patients undergoing 2 fractions will receive 25 Gy to the prostate over 7-10 days. The co-primary endpoints are GI and GU toxicities as measured by change scores in the bowel and urinary EPIC domains, respectively. The change scores will be calculated as pre-treatment (baseline) score subtracted from the 2-year score. DISCUSSION FORT is an international, multi-institutional prospective randomized phase II trial evaluating whether MR-guided SBRT delivered in 2 fractions versus 5 fractions is non-inferior from a gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity standpoint at 2 years post-treatment in men with low or intermediate risk PCa. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04984343 . Date of registration: July 30, 2021. PROTOCOL VERSION 4.0, Nov 8, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Wolfe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian, 525 East 68th Street, N-046, Box 169, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marshall A Diven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brooklyn Methodist Hospital/New York-Presbyterian, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Ariel E Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian, 525 East 68th Street, N-046, Box 169, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Xi Kathy Zhou
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - A U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - M L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian, 525 East 68th Street, N-046, Box 169, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Benitez CM, Steinberg ML, Cao M, Qi XS, Lamb JM, Kishan AU, Valle LF. MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Next Frontier in Ultrahypofractionation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4657. [PMID: 37760626 PMCID: PMC10526919 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) have improved real-time visualization of the prostate and its surrounding structures over CT-guided radiation therapy. Seminal studies have demonstrated safe dose escalation achieved through ultrahypofractionation with MRIgRT due to planning target volume (PTV) margin reduction and treatment gating. On-table adaptation with MRI-based technologies can also incorporate real-time changes in target shape and volume and can reduce high doses of radiation to sensitive surrounding structures that may move into the treatment field. Ongoing clinical trials seek to refine ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy treatments for prostate cancer using MRIgRT. Though these studies have the potential to demonstrate improved biochemical control and reduced side effects, limitations concerning patient treatment times and operational workflows may preclude wide adoption of this technology outside of centers of excellence. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of MRIgRT for prostate cancer, as well as clinical trials testing the efficacy and toxicity of ultrafractionation in patients with localized or post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Luca F. Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6951, USA (X.S.Q.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kubeš J, Sláviková S, Vítek P, Haas A, Ondrová B, Dedečková K, Andrlík M, Domanský M, Jiránková K, Schlencová V, Harazimová A, Turková B, Doležal T, Al-Hamami SFA, Vondráček V. 5-Years Analysis of Effectivity and Toxicity of Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4571. [PMID: 37760540 PMCID: PMC10526468 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We retrospectively analyzed the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and occurrence of late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy. METHODOLOGY In the period from January 2013 to June 2018, 853 patients with prostate cancer were treated with an ultra-hypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE/five fractions). The mean PSA value was 6.7 (0.7-19.7) µg/L. There were 318 (37.3%), 314 (36.8%), and 221 (25.9%) patients at low (LR), favorable intermediate (F-IR), and unfavorable intermediate risk (U-IR), respectively. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 197 (23.1%) patients, and 7 (0.8%) patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. The whole group of patients reached median follow-up time at 62.7 months, and their mean age was 64.8 (40.0-85.7) years. The bDFS rates and late toxicity profile were evaluated. RESULTS Median treatment time was 10 (7-38) days. Estimated 5-year bDFS rates were 96.5%, 93.7%, and 91.2% for low-, favorable intermediate-, and unfavorable intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Cumulative late toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) of G2+ was as follows: gastrointestinal (GI)-G2: 9.1%; G3: 0.5%; genitourinary (GU)-G2: 4.3%, and no G3 toxicity was observed. PSA relapse was observed in 58 (6.8%) patients: 16 local, 22 lymph node, 4 bone recurrences, and 10 combined sites of relapse were detected. Throughout the follow-up period, 40 patients (4.7%) died, though none due to prostate cancer. CONCLUSION Ultra-hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy is an effective treatment for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with long-term bDFS rates comparable to other techniques. It is promising for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and has acceptable long-term GI and favorable GU toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiri Kubeš
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Sítná Square 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Silvia Sláviková
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Pavel Vítek
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
- Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandra Haas
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Barbora Ondrová
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Kateřina Dedečková
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Michal Andrlík
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Martin Domanský
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Kateřina Jiránková
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Veronika Schlencová
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Anh Harazimová
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Barbora Turková
- Value Outcomes Ltd., Václavská 316/12, 120 00 Praha, Czech Republic; (B.T.); (T.D.)
| | - Tomáš Doležal
- Value Outcomes Ltd., Václavská 316/12, 120 00 Praha, Czech Republic; (B.T.); (T.D.)
| | - Sarah Falah Abass Al-Hamami
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| | - Vladimír Vondráček
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.S.); (P.V.); (A.H.); (B.O.); (K.D.); (M.D.); (K.J.); (V.S.); (A.H.); (S.F.A.A.-H.); (V.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
De Cock L, Draulans C, Pos FJ, Isebaert S, De Roover R, van der Heide UA, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, van der Voort van Zyp J, de Boer H, Kerkmeijer LGW, Haustermans K. From once-weekly to semi-weekly whole prostate gland stereotactic radiotherapy with focal boosting: Primary endpoint analysis of the multicenter phase II hypo-FLAME 2.0 trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 185:109713. [PMID: 37178932 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The hypo-FLAME trial showed that once-weekly (QW) focal boosted prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is associated with acceptable acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Currently, we investigated the safety of reducing the overall treatment time (OTT) of focal boosted prostate SBRT from 29 to 15 days. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were treated with SBRT delivering 35 Gy in 5 fractions to the whole prostate gland with an iso-toxic boost up to 50 Gy to the intraprostatic lesion(s) in a semi-weekly (BIW) schedule. The primary endpoint was radiation-induced acute toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Changes in quality of life (QoL) were examined in terms of proportions achieving a minimal clinically important change (MCIC). Finally, acute toxicity and QoL scores of the BIW schedule were compared with the results of the prior QW hypo-FLAME schedule (n = 100). RESULTS Between August 2020 and February 2022, 124 patients were enrolled and treated BIW. No grade ≥3 GU or GI toxicity was observed. The 90-days cumulative incidence of grade 2 GU and GI toxicity rates were 47.5% and 7.4%, respectively. Patients treated QW scored significant less grade 2 GU toxicity (34.0%, p = 0.01). No significant differences in acute GI toxicity were observed. Furthermore, patients treated QW had a superior acute bowel and urinary QoL. CONCLUSION Semi-weekly prostate SBRT with iso-toxic focal boosting is associated with acceptable acute GU and GI toxicity. Based on the comparison between the QW and BIW schedule, patients should be counselled regarding the short-term advantages of a more protracted schedule. Registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04045717.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa De Cock
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Hans de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shah S, Pepin A, Forsthoefel M, Burlile J, Collins BT, Simeng S, Aghdam N, Collins S. Testosterone as a Biomarker for Quality of Life (QOL) Following Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). Cureus 2023; 15:e44440. [PMID: 37791195 PMCID: PMC10544092 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) causes fatigue and sexual dysfunction. The time to testosterone recovery depends on patient and treatment-specific characteristics. The kinetics of testosterone recovery in men treated with neoadjuvant ADT and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is not well established. This study seeks to characterize testosterone recovery and evaluate its relationship with the improvement in patient-reported hormonal and sexual function. METHODS Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained for retrospective review of prospectively collected data. All patients with localized prostate cancer treated with short-course ADT (3-6 months of Leuprolide) and robotic SBRT (35-36.25 Gy in five fractions) at a single institution were included in this analysis. Testosterone levels were measured at the start of radiation, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Total testosterone recovery was defined as a serum level of >230 ng/dL. Sexual and hormonal function was recorded using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC)-26 prior to ADT initiation, the first day of SBRT, and at each follow-up. The EPIC-26 subdomain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting less bother. RESULTS Between January 2009 and May 2018, 122 men with a median age of 72 years (range: 55-89 years) received ADT followed by SBRT. Thirty-two percent (N=39) were black and 27% [N=39 were obese (BMI > 30)]. The median pre-SBRT testosterone level was 15 ng/dL (range: 3-89 ng/dL). Around 77% (N=94) of patients received 3 months of ADT. The median pre-ADT EPIC-26 Hormone and Sexual Domain Scores were 94 and 41, respectively. At 12 months, 71% (N=87) of patients recovered to a eugonadal state with a mean recovery time of 4 months post-SBRT. Hormonal and sexual subdomain scores declined significantly following ADT but recovered to within the minimally important difference (MID) for sexual and hormonal domain scores by 12 months post-SBRT. CONCLUSIONS Testosterone recovery following short-course ADT with leuprolide and SBRT occurs rapidly in the majority of patients within one year after treatment. Quality of life domain improvements followed the testosterone recovery trend closely. Testosterone testing at follow-up appointments would allow for anticipatory counseling that may limit the bother associated with temporary quality of life decrements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Shah
- Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Abigail Pepin
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Matthew Forsthoefel
- Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Brian T Collins
- Radiation Medicine, Tampa General Hospital (TGH) Cancer Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Suy Simeng
- Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Sean Collins
- Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Krampe N, Kaufman SR, Oerline MK, Hill D, Caram MEV, Shahinian VB, Hollenbeck BK, Maganty A. Health care delivery system contributions to management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17346-17355. [PMID: 37475511 PMCID: PMC10501260 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite clinical guidelines advocating for use of conservative management in specific clinical scenarios for men with prostate cancer, there continues to be tremendous variation in its uptake. This variation may be amplified among men with competing health risks, for whom treatment decisions are not straightforward. The degree to which characteristics of the health care delivery system explain this variation remains unclear. METHODS Using national Medicare data, men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to assess the association between use of treatment and health care delivery system determinants operating at the practice level, which included measures of financial incentives (i.e., radiation vault ownership), practice organization (i.e., single specialty vs. multispecialty groups), and the health care market (i.e., competition). Variance was partitioned to estimate the relative influence of patient and practice characteristics on the variation in use of treatment within strata of noncancer mortality risk groups. RESULTS Among 62,507 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, the largest variation in the use of treatment between practices was observed for men with high and very high-risk of noncancer mortality (range of practice-level rates of treatment for high: 57%-71% and very high: 41%-61%). Addition of health care delivery system determinants measured at the practice level explained 13% and 15% of the variation in use of treatment among men with low and intermediate risk of noncancer mortality in 10 years, respectively. Conversely, these characteristics explained a larger share of the variation in use of treatment among men with high and very high-risk of noncancer mortality (26% and 40%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Variation among urology practices in use of treatment was highest for men with high and very high-risk noncancer mortality. Practice characteristics explained a large share of this variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Krampe
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Samuel R. Kaufman
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Mary K. Oerline
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Dawson Hill
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Megan E. V. Caram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- VA Health Services Research & Development, Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Vahakn B. Shahinian
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Brent K. Hollenbeck
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Avinash Maganty
- Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bisht SS, Gupta D, Banerjee S, Kataria T. Re: Kumar A, Yadav S, Krishnappa RS, Gautam G, Raghavan N, Bakshi G, et al. The Urological Society of India guidelines for the evaluation and management of prostate cancer (executive summary). Indian J Urol 2022;38:252-7. Indian J Urol 2023; 39:249-251. [PMID: 37575166 PMCID: PMC10419779 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_103_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ong WL, Millar J. Late, persistent, substantial treatment-related symptoms (LAPERS) following low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:524-530. [PMID: 36707331 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to report 1) prevalence, 2) incidence, and 3) late, persistent, substantial treatment-related symptoms (LAPERS) after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study comprised men treated with LDRBT in a single Australian institution between 2014 and 2019. All men completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pretreatment, and at regular intervals posttreatment. 'Substantial' symptoms were defined as 'moderate' or 'big' problems in EPIC-26 which assesses the degree of symptom bother for each functional domain. 'Persistent' symptoms were defined as 'substantial' symptoms that present in at least half of the 'late' followup assessments. This provided a binary LAPERS outcome (yes/no). Prevalence (at each time point) and cumulative incidence of substantial symptoms were also reported. RESULTS A total of 172 men with 'baseline' and at least three 'late' followup EPIC-26 were included in the study. The median followup was 60 months (IQR: 36-74 months). For overall urinary function, prevalence of substantial symptoms was highest at 10% 6-month posttreatment, with 5-year cumulative incidence of 18%, but only 2% had LAPERS. For overall bowel function, prevalence of substantial symptoms was highest at 7% 12-months posttreatment, with 5-year cumulative incidence of 15%, and only 2% had LAPERS. For sexual function, prevalence of substantial symptoms was highest at 28% 6-months posttreatment, with 5-year cumulative incidence of 49%, and 22% had LAPERS (baseline-adjusted LAPERS 17%). CONCLUSIONS There were considerable differences in late toxicities using different toxicity-reporting approaches. LAPERS approach is more reflective of 'true' late toxicities considering duration and persistence of symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne VIC, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada..
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne VIC, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cruz-Lim EM, Cereno RE, Cañal JP, Vega G, Inocencio E, Mou B. Challenges to Improving Access to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Radiosurgery in the Philippines: A Case Study for Lower-Middle Income Countries. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:430-438. [PMID: 37179092 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Mae Cruz-Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zamboanga City Medical Center, Zamboanga City, Philippines; Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, Canada.
| | - Reno Eufemon Cereno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Manila Doctors Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Johanna Patricia Cañal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Gaudencio Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Medical City, Manila, Philippines
| | - Elrick Inocencio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Benjamin Mou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gorovets D, Wibmer AG, Moore A, Lobaugh S, Zhang Z, Kollmeier M, McBride S, Zelefsky MJ. Local Failure after Prostate SBRT Predominantly Occurs in the PI-RADS 4 or 5 Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:275-281. [PMID: 35307323 PMCID: PMC9481979 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A positive post-treatment prostate biopsy following definitive radiotherapy carries significant prognostic implications. OBJECTIVE To determine whether local recurrences after prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are associated with the presence of and occur more commonly within the region of a PI-RADS 4 or 5 dominant intra-prostatic lesion (DIL) identified on pre-treatment multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS 247 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with SBRT at our institution from 2009-2018 underwent post-treatment biopsies (median time to biopsy: 2.2 years) to evaluate local control. INTERVENTIONS Prostate SBRT (median 40 Gy in 5 fractions). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS MRIs were read by a single diagnostic radiologist blinded to other patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. The DIL presence, size, location, and extent were then analyzed to determine associations with the post-treatment biopsy outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among patients who underwent post-treatment biopsies, 39/247 (15.8%) were positive for Gleason-gradable prostate adenocarcinoma, of which 35/39 (90%) had a DIL initially present and 29/39 (74.4%) had a positive biopsy within the DIL. Factors independently associated with post-treatment biopsy outcomes included the presence of a DIL (OR 6.95; p = 0.001), radiographic T3 disease (OR 5.23, p < 0.001), SBRT dose ≥40 Gy (OR 0.26, p = 0.003), and use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; OR 0.28, p = 0.027). Among patients with a DIL (N = 149), the only factors associated with post-treatment biopsy outcomes included ≥50% percent cores positive (OR 2.4, p = 0.037), radiographic T3 disease (OR 4.04, p = 0.001), SBRT dose ≥40 Gy (OR 0.22, p < 0.001), and use of ADT (OR 0.21, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that men with PI-RADS 4 or 5 DILs have a higher risk of local recurrence after prostate SBRT and that most recurrences are located within the DIL. PATIENT SUMMARY We found the presence of a dominant tumor on pre-treatment MRI was strongly associated with residual cancer within the prostate after SBRT and that most recurrences were within the dominant tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Andreas G Wibmer
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marisa Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shintani T, Anami S, Sano K, Okada W, Tanooka M. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Using Tomotherapy With Synchrony Fiducial Tracking. Cureus 2023; 15:e40778. [PMID: 37485140 PMCID: PMC10362472 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous prospective and retrospective studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. Since SBRT utilizes a very tight margin, management of intrafraction prostate motion is necessary. As a real-time motion tracking and correction system (Synchrony; Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) has been introduced in the newer platform of tomotherapy (Radixact; Accuray), Radixact can deliver tracking SBRT. In the case report, we present the first clinical experience with prostate SBRT using tomotherapy with Synchrony fiducial tracking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Shintani
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, JPN
| | - Shimpei Anami
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, JPN
| | - Keisuke Sano
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, JPN
| | - Wataru Okada
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, JPN
| | - Masao Tanooka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fujii K, Nakano M, Kawakami S, Tanaka Y, Kainuma T, Tsumura H, Tabata KI, Satoh T, Iwamura M, Ishiyama H. Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity after Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Single-Institutional Experience of 145 Patients. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5062-5071. [PMID: 37232841 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer have increased. However, the relationships between adverse events and risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify associations between adverse events and dose index for prostate SBRT. Participants comprised 145 patients irradiated with 32-36 Gy in 4 fractions. Radiotherapy-related risk factors such as dose-volume histogram parameters and patient-related risk factors such as T stage and Gleason score were evaluated in a competing risk analysis. Median follow-up duration was 42.9 months. A total of 9.7% had acute Grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities and 4.8% had acute Grade ≥ 2 GI toxicities. A total of 11.1% had late Grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities and 7.6% had late Grade ≥ 2 GI toxicities. Two (1.4%) patients suffered from late Grade 3 GU toxicities. Similarly, two (1.4%) patients suffered from late Grade 3 GI toxicities. Acute GU and GI events correlated with prostate volume and dose to the hottest 10 cc volume (D10cc)/volumes receiving a minimum of 30 Gy (V30 Gy) of rectum, respectively. Late GI toxicity, frequency, and rectal hemorrhage correlated with rectal D0.1 cc/D1 cc, maximum dose to the bladder, and rectal D0.1 cc, respectively. Toxicities after prostate SBRT using 32-36 Gy/4 fractions were acceptable. Our analysis showed that acute toxicities correlated with volume receiving a medium dose level, and late toxicities correlated with highest point dose of organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyohei Fujii
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University Hospital, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Shogo Kawakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Yuichi Tanaka
- Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Takuro Kainuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Tsumura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Tabata
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Takefumi Satoh
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ishiyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| |
Collapse
|