Assessment of Prescription Analgesic Use in Older Adults With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease and Outcomes

Pharmacological Pain Treatment in Older Persons

Pharmacological pain treatment in older persons is presented by a multi-disciplinary group of European pain experts. Drugs recommended for acute or chronic nociceptive pain, also for neuropathic pain and the routes of administration of choice are the same as those prescribed for younger persons but comorbidities and polypharmacy in older persons increase the risk of adverse effects and drug interactions. Not all drugs are available or authorised in all European countries. For mild-to-moderate pain, non-opioids including paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line treatments, followed by nefopam and metamizole. Codeine, dihydrocodeine and tramadol are prescribed for moderate to severe pain and 'strong' opioids, including morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, methadone and tapentadol, for severe pain. Chronic neuropathic pain treatment relies on coanalgesics, including anti-epileptics (gabapentinoids) and anti-depressants with additional option of topical lidocaine and capsaicine. The choice of analgesic(s) and the route of administration should be guided by the pain characteristics, as well as by the patient's comorbidities, organ function and medications. Several directions have been highlighted to optimise pharmacological pain management in older individuals: (1) before starting pain treatment adequately detect and assess pain and always perform a full geriatric assessment, (2) consider kidney function systematically to adjust the doses of analgesics and avoid the risks of overdose, (3) start with the lowest dose of an analgesic and increase it gradually under the control of the effect, (4) involve the older persons and family in their treatment, (5) reevaluate pain regularly during treatment and (6) combine pharmacological treatment with non-pharmacological approaches.

What influences post-operative opioid requirements for tibial fractures?

Introduction

Currently there are few opioid prescribing guidelines for orthopaedic fractures. Long-term post-surgical analgesia requirements, understandably, vary between orthopaedic cases. Our study aims to provide detailed information to clinicians and policy makers, on the opioid requirement associations for patients sustaining tibial fractures.

Methods

This study reviewed all patients sustaining an isolated tibial fracture at a major trauma centre that were operated on within 1 month of injury, from 2015 to 2022. The total opioid dosage used each month in morphine milligrams equivalents (MME) and the number of days opioids were used each month, within the first-year post-surgery were collected, representing the strength and coverage of opioid analgesia in the post-operative stage, respectively. We compared opioid strength and coverage requirements with types of definitive fracture fixations, location, fracture type and concurrent patient medical comorbidities to assess for any trends.

Results

A total of 1814 patients sustaining a combined of 1970 fractures were included in the study. Tibial plateau fractures had the highest opioid strength and coverage requirements in each month and the entire year (p < .05). Across all fracture locations, Ex Fix frame showed higher opioid strength and coverage requirements compared to both IM nailing and plate ORIF. With regard to opioid coverage in the presence of specific comorbidities, only chronic kidney disease (quotient: 1.37, 95% Confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.19-1.55, p = .002) and hypertension (quotient: 1.34, 95%CI = 1.14-1.53, p = .009) showed significance at the 1-year overall level. For opioid strength, Chronic Kidney Disease (quotient: 1.72, 95%CI = 1.41-2.03 p = .005) and COPD (quotient: 1.90, 95%CI = 1.44-2.36, p = .014), show significance at the 1-year overall level.

Conclusion

Our study details opioid requirements post-surgery amongst tibial fractures with subgroup analysis assessing opioid needs amongst specific fracture locations, types, surgical techniques and medical comorbidities. This framework aids clinicians in anticipating rehabilitation and assists in risk stratifying patients at injury onset.

Two Weeks of Continuous Opioid Treatment in an Adenine-Induced Mouse Model of Chronic Kidney Disease Exacerbates the Bone Inflammatory State and Increases Osteoclasts

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) report high pain levels, but reduced renal clearance eliminates many analgesic options; therefore, 30-50% of CKD patients have chronic opioid prescriptions. Opioid use in CKD is associated with higher fracture rates. Opioids may directly alter bone turnover directly through effects on bone cells and indirectly via increasing inflammation. We hypothesized that continuous opioid exposure would exacerbate the high bone turnover state of CKD and be associated with elevated measures of inflammation. Male C57Bl/6J mice after 8 weeks of adenine-induced CKD (AD) and non-AD controls (CON) had 14-day osmotic pumps (0.25-µL/hr release) containing either saline or 50-mg/mL oxycodone (OXY) surgically implanted in the subscapular region. After 2 weeks, all AD mice had elevated blood urea nitrogen, parathyroid hormone, and serum markers of bone turnover compared to controls with no effect of OXY. Immunohistochemical staining of the distal femur showed increased numbers of osteocytes positive for the mu opioid and for toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) due to OXY. Osteocyte protein expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and RANKL were higher due to both AD and OXY so that AD + OXY mice had the highest values. Trabecular osteoclast-covered surfaces were also significantly higher due to both AD and OXY, resulting in AD + OXY mice having 4.5-fold higher osteoclast-covered surfaces than untreated CON. These data demonstrate that opioids are associated with a pro-inflammatory state in osteocytes which increases the pro-resorptive state of CKD.

Acute Kidney Injury and Subsequent Kidney Failure With Replacement Therapy Incidence in Older Adults With Advanced CKD: A Cohort Study of US Veterans

Rationale & Objective

Advanced age is a major risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) development, which has high heterogeneity in disease progression. Acute kidney injury (AKI) hospitalization rates are increasing, especially among older adults. Previous AKI epidemiologic analyses have focused on hospitalized populations, which may bias results toward sicker populations. This study examined the association between AKI and incident kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) while evaluating age as an effect modifier of this relationship.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants

24,133 Veterans at least 65 years old with incident CKD stage 4 from 2011 to 2013.

Exposures

AKI, AKI severity, and age.

Outcomes

KFRT and death.

Analytical Approach

The Fine-Gray competing risk regression was used to model AKI and incident KFRT with death as a competing risk. A Cox regression was used to model AKI severity and death.

Results

Despite a nonsignificant age interaction between AKI and KFRT, a clinically relevant combined effect of AKI and age on incident KFRT was observed. Compared with our oldest age group without AKI, those aged 65-74 years with AKI had the highest risk of KFRT (subdistribution HR [sHR], 14.9; 95% CI, 12.7-17.4), whereas those at least 85 years old with AKI had the lowest (sHR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.22-2.39). Once Veterans underwent KFRT, their risk of death increased by 44%. A 2-fold increased risk of KFRT was observed across all AKI severity stages. However, the risk of death increased with worsening AKI severity.

Limitations

Our study lacked generalizability, was restricted to ever use of medications, and used inpatient serum creatinine laboratory results to define AKI and AKI severity.

Conclusions

In this national cohort, advanced age was protective against incident KFRT but not death. This is likely explained by the high frequency of deaths observed in this population (51.1%). Nonetheless, AKI and younger age are substantial risk factors for incident KFRT.

Scoping review of interventions to de-implement potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in healthcare settings

OBJECTIVES

Potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilisation persists at undesirable rates worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for future research.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar (1 January 2000 to 31 May 2022).

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting on the effectiveness of interventions to systematically reduce potentially harmful NSAID utilisation in healthcare settings.

DATA EXTRACTION

Using Covidence systematic review software, we extracted study and intervention characteristics, including the effectiveness of interventions in reducing NSAID utilisation.

RESULTS

From 7818 articles initially identified, 68 were included in the review. Most studies took place in European countries (45.6%) or the USA (35.3%), with randomised controlled trial as the most common design (55.9%). Interventions were largely clinician-facing (76.2%) and delivered in primary care (60.2%) but were rarely (14.9%) guided by an implementation model, framework or theory. Academic detailing, clinical decision support or electronic medical record interventions, performance reports and pharmacist review were frequent approaches employed. NSAID use was most commonly classified as potentially harmful based on patients' age (55.8%), history of gastrointestinal disorders (47.1%), or history of kidney disease (38.2%). Only 7.4% of interventions focused on over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs in addition to prescription. The majority of studies (76.2%) reported a reduction in the utilisation of potentially harmful NSAIDs. Few studies (5.9%) evaluated pain or quality of life following NSAIDs discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Many varied interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs have been applied in healthcare settings worldwide. Based on these findings and identified knowledge gaps, further efforts to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and the combination of intervention characteristics associated with effective de-implementation are needed. In addition, future work should be guided by de-implementation theory, focus on OTC NSAIDs and incorporate patient-focused strategies and outcomes, including the evaluation of unintended consequences of the intervention.

The association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life among non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The United States government spends over $85 billion annually on treating non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD are prescribed a multitude of medications to manage numerous comorbidities associated with CKD. Thus, this study aims to investigate the association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in non-dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 through 2019. We classified polypharmacy into three groups based on the number of medication classes: ≤ 4 (minor polypharmacy), 5 through 9 (major polypharmacy), and ≥ 10 (hyperpolypharmacy). To measure HRQoL, a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) were obtained from the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 and Veteran's Rand 12 item. We applied multivariable ordinary least squares regression to assess the association between polypharmacy and HRQoL in non-dialysis CKD patients.

RESULTS

A total of 649 CKD patients (weighted n = 667,989) were included. Patients with minor polypharmacy, major polypharmacy, and hyperpolypharmacy were 22.27%, 48.24%, and 29.48%, respectively. Major polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were significantly and negatively associated with lower PCS scores when compared with minor polypharmacy [Beta = -3.12 (95% CI: -3.62, -2.62), p-value<0.001; Beta = -4.13 (95CI: -4.74, -3.52), p-value<0.001]. Similarly, major polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were significantly and negatively associated with lower MCS scores when compared to minor polypharmacy [Beta = -0.38 (95% CI: -0.55, -0.20), p-value<0.001; Beta = -1.70 (95% CI: -2.01, -1.40), p-value<0.001]. The top 5 classes of medications used by CKD patients were antihyperlipidemic (56.31%), beta-adrenergic blockers (49.71%), antidiabetics (42.14%), analgesics (42.17%), and diuretics (39.65%).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that both major polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were associated with lower HRQoL among non-dialysis CKD patients. This study highlights the need for further evaluation of the combination of medications taken by non-dialysis CKD patients to minimize unnecessary and inappropriate medication use.

Opioid utilization after lower extremity amputation for peripheral vascular disease and discharge prescribing recommendations

OBJECTIVES

Opioids are commonly used for pain control after lower extremity amputations (LEA)-below the knee amputations (BKA) and above the knee amputations (AKA). Well-defined benchmarks for prescription requirements after amputation are deficient. This analysis evaluated opioid utilization after amputation to identify high-risk patients and provide recommendations for post-hospitalization opioid prescriptions at discharge.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LEA (2008-2016) with identified peripheral vascular disease were selected from Cerner's Health Facts® database using ICD-9 and 10 diagnosis and procedure codes. Patient demographics, disease severity, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were evaluated. Post-operative opioid medications administered intravenously and orally during the hospital stay were identified from the data and converted to Morphine Milligram Equivalent per day (MME/d) for an evaluation and comparison during the index hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were used to report continuous and dichotomous variables. Dichotomous variables are reported as n (%) and continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Chi-square and T-tests were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

2399 patients who underwent AKA or BKA with peripheral vascular disease were evaluated. Sixty-three percent of the cohort was male, 67% Caucasian, and 42% married, and 58% had a Charlson index >3. The majority of patients had an average length of hospital stay of 5.7 days (M = 5.72, SD = 4.56). Patient groups that used significantly higher MME/d in the early postop period included: BKA (29.2 vs 20.7, p = 0.006), males (62.6 vs 54.0, p < 0.0001), Caucasians (64.3 vs 44.7, p < 0.0001), younger patients (69.6 vs 54.0, p < 0.0001), and those at non-training institutions (66.7 vs 56.7, p < 0.0001). Patients whose hospital stay was greater than 6 days were found to have increased opioid utilization likely secondary to index complications. For those discharged by post-operative day 7, the mean MME utilized on postop day 1 was 59.5 and decreased to a mean MME/d utilization prior to discharge of 17.6.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that younger patients, males, patients with BKAs, and those who receive amputations for vascular disease at non-training institutions have higher post-operative opioid utilization during the hospital stay. At the time of discharge, patients utilized an average of 17.6 MME/d which equates to approximately three hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg tablets per day. Based on these findings, vascular surgeons are likely over prescribing opioids at discharge and must be cognizant of appropriate dosing quantities. Prescriptions at discharge should reflect the daily utilization described from this analysis and tapered to avoid chronic utilization, overdose, and possible death.

A Scoping Review of Interventions to De-implement Potentially Harmful Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Healthcare Settings

Objectives

Potentially harmful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilization persists at undesirable rates throughout the world. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for future research.

Design

Scoping review.

Data Sources

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar (2000-2022).

Study Selection

Studies reporting on the effectiveness of interventions to systematically reduce potentially harmful NSAID utilization in healthcare settings.

Data Extraction

Using Covidence systematic review software, we extracted study and intervention characteristics, including the effectiveness of interventions in reducing NSAID utilization.

Results

From 7,818 articles initially identified, 68 were included in the review. Most studies took place in European countries (45.6%) or the U.S. (35.3%), with randomized controlled trial as the most common design (55.9%). The majority of studies (76.2%) reported a reduction in the utilization of potentially harmful NSAIDs. Interventions were largely clinician-facing (76.2%) and delivered in primary care (60.2%). Academic detailing, clinical decision support or electronic medical record interventions, performance reports, and pharmacist review were frequent approaches employed. NSAID use was most commonly classified as potentially harmful based on patients' age (55.8%) or history of gastrointestinal disorders (47.1%) or kidney disease (38.2%). Only 7.4% of interventions focused on over-the-counter NSAIDs in addition to prescription. Few studies (5.9%) evaluated pain or quality of life following NSAIDs discontinuation.

Conclusion

Many varied interventions are effective in de-implementing potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings. Efforts to adapt, scale, and disseminate these interventions are needed. In addition, future interventions should address over-the-counter NSAIDs, which are broadly available and widely used. Evaluating unintended consequences of interventions, including patient-focused outcomes, is another important priority.

Pattern, frequency and factors associated with inappropriate high dosing in chronic kidney disease patients at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) are susceptible to the toxic drug effects if given unadjusted doses. Although Pakistan harbors a high burden of CKD patients, there is limited information available on the frequency, pattern and factors associated with unadjusted drug doses among CKD patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study conducted at Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta included 303 non-dialysis ambulatory CKD patients (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73m²). The patients' data were collected through a purpose designed data collection form. The appropriateness of doses was checked against the renal drug handbook-2018, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines, British National Formulary-2022, and manufacturer leaflets. Data were analysed by SPSS 23 and multiple binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the factors associated with receiving inappropriate high doses. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The patients received a total of 2265 prescription lines, with a median of eight different drugs per patient (interquartile range: 6-9 drugs). A total of 34.5% (783/2265) drugs required dose adjustment. Of these, doses were not adjusted for 56.1% (440) drugs in 162 (53.4%) patients. The most common pharmacological class of drugs requiring dose adjustment were antibiotics (79.1%), followed by antidiabetics (59.2%), diuretics (57.0%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (56.9%), beta blockers (56.9%), analgesics (56.0%), angiotensin receptor blockers (55.2%), domperidone (53.9%) and antihyperlipidmics (46.1%). Patient's age of 41-60 (OR = 5.76) and > 60 years (OR = 9.49), hypertension (OR = 2.68), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.47) and cardiovascular diseases (OR = 2.82) had statistically significant association (p-value < 0.05) with inappropriate high doses.

CONCLUSION

The high frequency of inappropriate high doses suggests an important quality gap in medication dosing for patients with ND-CKD at the study site. Special attention should be paid to the drugs and patients with identified risk factors for receiving inappropriate high doses.

Population-Based Analysis of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Prescription in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease

Background

Pain is a prevalent symptom experienced by patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and appropriate management of pain is an important element of comprehensive care. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are known to be nephrotoxic in persons with CKD.

Objective

This study examined the pattern of NSAID prescribing practices in a population based-cohort of patients with CKD.

Design

Retrospective cohort study using linked population-based health care data.

Setting

Entire province of Alberta, Canada.

Participants

All adults in Alberta with eGFR defined CKD G3 or greater between 2009 and 2017 were included.

Measurements

CKD was defined using at least 2 outpatient serum creatinine (SCr) greater than 90 days apart; the date of second SCr measurement was used as index date. We determined the incidence of hyperkalemia using the peak serum potassium. Prescription drug information was obtained from the Pharmaceutical Information Network (PIN) database.

Methods

All patients were followed from the index date until March 31, 2019, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Prescription drug information and the follow-up laboratory testing of serum creatinine and serum potassium were obtained. Patients with kidney failure defined as eGFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m², receiving chronic dialysis, or prior kidney transplant at baseline were excluded.

Results

A total of 170 574 adults (mean age 76.3; 44% male) with CKD were identified and followed for a median of 7 years; 27% were dispensed at least 1 NSAID prescription. While there was a trend toward fewer prescriptions in patients with more advanced CKD (P < .001), 16% of those with CKD G4 were prescribed an NSAID. Primary care providers provided 79% of the prescriptions. Among NSAID users, 21% had a follow-up serum creatinine (SCr) within 30 days of the index prescription.

Limitations

Data collected were from clinical and administrative databases not created for research purposes. The study cohort is limited to subjects who sought medical care and had a serum creatinine measurement obtained. Measurement of NSAID use is limited to those who were dispensed a prescription, over-the-counter NSAIDs use is not captured.

Conclusions

Despite guidelines advocating cautious use of NSAIDs in patients with CKD, this study indicates that there is a discrepancy from best practice recommendations. Effective strategies to better support and educate prescribers, as well as patients, may help reduce inappropriate prescribing and adverse events.

Opioid prescribing practices in chronic kidney disease: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is common, and its management is complex in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but limited data are available on opioid prescribing. We examined opioid prescribing for non-cancer and non-end-of-life care in patients with CKD.

METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative databases in Ontario, Canada which included adults with CKD defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 from 1 November 2012 to 31 December 2018 and estimated the proportion of opioid prescriptions (type, duration, dose, potentially inappropriate prescribing, etc.) within 1 year of cohort entry. Prescriptions had to precede dialysis, kidney transplant or death.

RESULTS

We included 680 445 adults with CKD, and 198 063 (29.1%) were prescribed opioids. Codeine (14.9%) and hydromorphone (7.2%) were the most common opioids. Among opioid users, 24.3% had repeated or long-term use, 26.1% were prescribed high doses and 56.8% were new users. Opioid users were more likely to be female, had cardiac disease or a mental health diagnosis, and had more healthcare visits. The proportions for potentially inappropriate prescribing indicators varied (e.g. 50.1% with eGFR <30 were prescribed codeine, and 20.6% of opioid users were concurrently prescribed benzodiazepines, while 7.2% with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were prescribed morphine, and 7.0% were received more than one opioid concurrently). Opioid prescriptions declined with time (2013 cohort: 31.1% versus 2018 cohort: 24.5%; p <0.0001), as did indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid use was common in patients with CKD. While opioid prescriptions and potentially inappropriate prescribing have declined in recent years, interventions to improve pain management without the use of opioids and education on safer prescribing practices are needed.

Clin-Star corner: What is new at the interface of geriatrics and nephrology?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent and burdensome among older adults in the United States. CKD affects at least 15% of the US population, and adults over 65 comprise the largest subset within this group. In this special article, we highlight key findings of three recent original investigations in nephrology and describe each study, relevance to the care of older adults, and current areas of uncertainty that warrant further investigation. Articles relate to removal of the race adjustment in the estimation of kidney function, the use of novel therapeutics to halt CKD progression and improve cardiovascular outcomes, and medication management for short-term pain control in CKD.

Increasing rates of parathyroidectomy to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients with Medicare coverage

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperparathyroidism affects nearly all patients with renal failure on dialysis. Medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism has considerably evolved over the past 2 decades, with parathyroidectomy reserved for severe cases. The primary objective of our study was to understand how trends in medical treatments affected parathyroidectomy rates in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism on dialysis.

METHODS

We used the United States Renal Data System to identify 379,835 adult patients (age ≥18) who were on maintenance dialysis in the United States between 2006 and 2016 with Medicare as the primary payor and ascertained treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Adjusted rate ratios for rates of parathyroidectomy were calculated using multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Of 379,835 secondary hyperparathyroidism patients, 4,118 (1.1%) underwent parathyroidectomy, 39,835 (10.5%) received cinacalcet, 243,522 (64.1%) received phosphate binders, 17,571 (4.6%) received vitamin D analogs, and 86,899 (22.9%) received no treatment during the 10 years of follow-up. Over the entire study period, there was a 3.5-fold increase in the use of calcimimetics and a 3.4-fold increase in rates of parathyroidectomy. Compared to 2006 through 2009, utilization of parathyroidectomy increased 52% (adjusted rate ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.39-1.65) between 2010 and 2013 and by 106% (adjusted rate ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.90-2.24) between 2014 and 2016. The greatest increase in parathyroidectomy utilization occurred in younger patients (age 18-64 years), Black patients, female patients, those living in higher poverty neighborhoods, those listed for kidney transplant, and those who live in the Southern region of the United States.

CONCLUSION

Despite the evolution of medical treatments and an increase in the use of calcimimetics to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroidectomy rates have been steadily increasing among dialysis patients with Medicare coverage.

A Single Oral Dose of Diclofenac Causes Transition of Experimental Subclinical Acute Kidney Injury to Chronic Kidney Disease

Nephrotoxic drugs can cause acute kidney injury (AKI) and analgesic nephropathy. Diclofenac is potentially nephrotoxic and frequently prescribed for pain control. In this study, we investigated the effects of single and repetitive oral doses of diclofenac in the setting of pre-existing subclinical AKI on the further course of AKI and on long-term renal consequences. Unilateral renal ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) for 15 min was performed in male CD1 mice to induce subclinical AKI. Immediately after surgery, single oral doses (100 mg or 200 mg) of diclofenac were administered. In a separate experimental series, repetitive treatment with 100 mg diclofenac over three days was performed after IRI and sham surgery. Renal morphology and pro-fibrotic markers were investigated 24 h and two weeks after the single dose and three days after the repetitive dose of diclofenac treatment using histology, immunofluorescence, and qPCR. Renal function was studied in a bilateral renal IRI model. A single oral dose of 200 mg, but not 100 mg, of diclofenac after IRI aggravated acute tubular injury after 24 h and caused interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy two weeks later. Repetitive treatment with 100 mg diclofenac over three days aggravated renal injury and caused upregulation of the pro-fibrotic marker fibronectin in the setting of subclinical AKI, but not in sham control kidneys. In conclusion, diclofenac aggravated renal injury in pre-existing subclinical AKI in a dose and time-dependent manner and already a single dose can cause progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) in this model.

Pain after Arteriovenous Access Creation

OBJECTIVES

Dialysis access creation is a common outpatient procedure that can be completed using general, regional, or local anesthetic techniques. There are few endorsed guidelines regarding opioid-based pain control following fistula creation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether utilization of regional anesthesia (RA) is associated with the decreased use of narcotics postoperatively.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study including all patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation with one vascular surgeon from August 2019 to February 2020. Patients were selected for regional versus general anesthesia. Selection for anesthesia type was determined by the primary anesthesiologist. Patients selected for RA underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 30 cm³ of 0.5% ropivacaine. Patients were seen in clinic follow-up and completed a questionnaire regarding their postoperative opiate use and pain control.

RESULTS

In the study period, 52 patients underwent arteriovenous fistula creation and completed the follow-up questionnaire. Forty patients received RA. Seventy-five percent of patients sent home with a narcotic prescription filled the prescription. There was a significant difference in postoperative opioid use between the two study groups. Patients who received regional block took on average 3.3 pills totaling 16.5 morphine milligram equivalents, whereas patients who received general anesthesia took on average 6.64 pills totaling 33.2 morphine milligram equivalents (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality related to opiate use continues to be a public health issue in the United States. This study demonstrates that regional anesthetic techniques in comparison to general anesthesia can result in a significant decrease in postoperative opiate consumption.

Emerging Patient-Centered Concepts in Pain Among Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease, Maintenance Dialysis, and Kidney Transplant

Patient reports of moderate to severe pain are common across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease. The synergistic effects of comorbid depression and anxiety can lead to maladaptive coping responses to pain, namely pain catastrophizing and illness-related post-traumatic stress disorder. If underlying depression and anxiety and associated maladaptive coping responses are not treated, patients can experience an increased perception of pain, worsened disability, decreased quality of life, withdrawal from social activities, and increased morbidity and mortality. Meanwhile, interest in nonpharmacologic treatments for pain that targets coping as well as comorbid anxiety and depression has been increasing, particularly given the significant societal damage that has resulted from the opioid epidemic. Evidence-based, nonpharmacologic treatments have shown promise in treating pain in areas outside of nephrology. Currently, little is known about the effects of these treatments among adults with CKD, and particularly end-stage kidney disease, when chronic pain can become debilitating. In this review, we examine patient-centered concepts related to pain that have received little attention in the nephrology literature. We also describe emerging areas of research, including omics technologies for biomarker discovery and advanced symptom clustering methods for symptom phenotyping, which may be useful to future kidney disease research and treatment.

Self-Reported Medication Use and Urinary Drug Metabolites in the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) Study

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is common among patients with CKD, but little is known about the urinary excretion of many drugs and their metabolites among patients with CKD.

METHODS

To evaluate self-reported medication use in relation to urine drug metabolite levels in a large cohort of patients with CKD, the German Chronic Kidney Disease study, we ascertained self-reported use of 158 substances and 41 medication groups, and coded active ingredients according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. We used a nontargeted mass spectrometry-based approach to quantify metabolites in urine; calculated specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of medication use and corresponding metabolite measurements; and used multivariable regression models to evaluate associations and prescription patterns.

RESULTS

Among 4885 participants, there were 108 medication-drug metabolite pairs on the basis of reported medication use and 78 drug metabolites. Accuracy was excellent for measurements of 36 individual substances in which the unchanged drug was measured in urine (median, 98.5%; range, 61.1%-100%). For 66 pairs of substances and their related drug metabolites, median measurement-based specificity and sensitivity were 99.2% (range, 84.0%-100%) and 71.7% (range, 1.2%-100%), respectively. Commonly prescribed medications for hypertension and cardiovascular risk reduction-including angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and metoprolol-showed high sensitivity and specificity. Although self-reported use of prescribed analgesics (acetaminophen, ibuprofen) was <3% each, drug metabolite levels indicated higher usage (acetaminophen, 10%-26%; ibuprofen, 10%-18%).

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive screen of associations between urine drug metabolite levels and self-reported medication use supports the use of pharmacometabolomics to assess medication adherence and prescription patterns in persons with CKD, and indicates under-reported use of medications available over the counter, such as analgesics.

[Analgesic Drug Therapy in Kidney Patients]

Analgesic drug therapy in kidney patients needs special expertise. Patients with kidney disease frequently have pain and they have chronic pain more than others. Some analgesic drugs have a nephrotoxic potential and co-analgesics such as anticonvulsive, antidepressive and antipsychotic drugs need a dose adjustment to kindey function. When treating kidney patients with morphine, the accumulation kinetics of the M6 glucuronide must be observed. Otherwise, the risk increases for respiratory depression.

Kidney damage from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-Myth or truth? Review of selected literature

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely available drugs with anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. Their mechanism of action is associated with the enzymes of the arachidonic acid cycle (cyclooxygenases: COX-1 and COX-2). The cyclooxygenase pathway results in the formation of prostanoids (prostaglandins [PGs], prostacyclins, and thromboxanes). It affects various structures of the human body, including the kidneys. Medical literature associates the usage of NSAIDs with acute kidney injury (AKI), tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN), as well as nephrotic syndrome and chronic kidney disease (CKD). AKI associated with the chronic consumption of NSAIDs is mainly attributed to pharmacological polytherapy and the presence of cardiovascular or hepatic comorbidities. The pathomechanism of AKI and CKD is associated with inhibition of the biosynthesis of prostanoids involved in the maintenance of renal blood flow, especially PGE2 and PGI2. It is suggested that both COX isoforms play opposing roles in renal function, with natriuresis increased by COX-1 inhibition followed by a drop in a blood pressure, whereas COX-2 inhibition increases blood pressure and promotes sodium retention. TIN after NSAID use is potentially associated with glomerular basement membrane damage, reduction in pore size, and podocyte density. Therefore, nephrotic proteinuria and impairment of renal function may occur. The following article analyzes the association of NSAIDs with kidney disease based on available medical literature.

Trends in Use of Prescription Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Medications Before vs After Implementation of a Florida Law Restricting Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain

IMPORTANCE

Previous research has shown an immediate reduction in new opioid users and use after implementation of the opioid supply restriction laws. Assessment of the association between opioid restrictions and alternative treatment options, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), is needed to evaluate potential unintended consequences for patients requiring analgesia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between an opioid restriction law in Florida and use of prescription NSAIDs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This quality improvement study used interrupted time series analyses accounting for autocorrelation to estimate immediate and trend changes in the prescribing and use of prescription NSAIDs in Florida before and after implementation of a state law limiting opioid prescriptions to a 3-day supply. Participants were enrollees in a single private health plan of a large university and health system employer in Florida from January 2015 to June 2019.

EXPOSURES

Prescriptions for NSAIDs, ascertained from pharmacy claims data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The following outcomes were calculated monthly per 1000 plan enrollees: (1) number of NSAID users; (2) mean days' supply of NSAIDs per prescription; and (3) mean number of NSAID prescriptions. Individuals were classified as NSAID users if they had at least 1 NSAID prescription in a given month. Analysis was stratified by route of NSAID administration (oral or nonoral).

RESULTS

Among 46 783 NSAID users with 79 089 NSAID prescriptions during the study period, the median age was 47 years (interquartile range, 35-57 years). After implementation of the opioid restriction law, the number of NSAID users immediately increased, but the difference was not significant (change, 0.82 per 1000 patients; 95% CI, -0.67 to 2.30 per 1000 patients). No significant change in the days' supply of oral NSAID users occurred (change, 0.21 days per prescription; 95% CI, -1.66 to 2.08 days per prescription). Before implementation of the law, there was a nonsignificant decreasing trend in NSAID prescriptions (rate of change, -0.03 per month per 1000 enrollees; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.07 per month per 1000 enrollees; after implementation, there was a nonsignificant increase in the number of oral and nonoral NSAID prescriptions (change, 1.49 per 1000 enrollees; 95% CI, -3.38 to 6.37 per 1000 enrollees).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this quality improvement study, prescribing and use of prescription NSAIDs did not increase after implementation of a law restricting opioid analgesic prescriptions in Florida. These findings suggest possible greater use of over-the-counter NSAIDs after implementation of the law, but further research is needed to evaluate changes in the use of nonopioid analgesics and alternative pain therapies.