1
|
Ghariq M, van den Hout WB, Dekkers OM, Bootsma M, de Groot B, Groothuis JGJ, Harms MPM, Hemels MEW, Kaal ECA, Koomen EM, de Lange FJ, Peeters SYG, van Rossum IA, Rutten JHW, van Zwet EW, van Dijk JG, Thijs RD. Diagnostic and societal impact of implementing the syncope guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (SYNERGY study). BMC Med 2023; 21:365. [PMID: 37743496 PMCID: PMC10518933 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03056-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Syncope management is fraught with unnecessary tests and frequent failure to establish a diagnosis. We evaluated the potential of implementing the 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Syncope Guidelines regarding diagnostic yield, accuracy and costs. METHODS A multicentre pre-post study in five Dutch hospitals comparing two groups of syncope patients visiting the emergency department: one before intervention (usual care; from March 2017 to February 2019) and one afterwards (from October 2017 to September 2019). The intervention consisted of the simultaneous implementation of the ESC Syncope Guidelines with quick referral routes to a syncope unit when indicated. The primary objective was to compare diagnostic accuracy using logistic regression analysis accounting for the study site. Secondary outcome measures included diagnostic yield, syncope-related healthcare and societal costs. One-year follow-up data were used to define a gold standard reference diagnosis by applying ESC criteria or, if not possible, evaluation by an expert committee. We determined the accuracy by comparing the treating physician's diagnosis with the reference diagnosis. RESULTS We included 521 patients (usual care, n = 275; syncope guidelines intervention, n = 246). The syncope guidelines intervention resulted in a higher diagnostic accuracy in the syncope guidelines group than in the usual care group (86% vs.69%; risk ratio 1.15; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.23) and a higher diagnostic yield (89% vs. 76%, 95% CI of the difference 6 to 19%). Syncope-related healthcare costs did not differ between the groups, yet the syncope guideline implementation resulted in lower total syncope-related societal costs compared to usual care (saving €908 per patient; 95% CI €34 to €1782). CONCLUSIONS ESC Syncope Guidelines implementation in the emergency department with quick referral routes to a syncope unit improved diagnostic yield and accuracy and lowered societal costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register, NTR6268.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ghariq
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - W B van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - O M Dekkers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Bootsma
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B de Groot
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J G J Groothuis
- Department of Cardiology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M P M Harms
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M E W Hemels
- Department of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E C A Kaal
- Department of Neurology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Koomen
- Department of Cardiology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - F J de Lange
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Y G Peeters
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - I A van Rossum
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J H W Rutten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E W van Zwet
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J G van Dijk
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R D Thijs
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quinn J, Chung S, Kim D. Association of physician malpractice claims rates with admissions for low-risk chest pain. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE OPEN 2023; 9:100041. [PMID: 39035061 PMCID: PMC11256247 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Background Chest pain accounts for 5% of all emergency department visits and accounts for the highest malpractice payout against emergency physicians. To clarify the impact of defensive medicine, we assessed whether admission rates of low-risk chest pain patients are associated with malpractice claims rates. Methods A cross-sectional time-series analysis of state-year level malpractice claims rates, admission rates for low-risk chest pain (LRCP; requiring ED physician discretion), and admission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI; requiring minimal physician judgment for admission, used as a control) from 2008 to 2017 was performed. Admission rates were derived from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. LRCP visits were defined by primary ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes of 786.5, R07.9, or R07.89; length of stay of 2 or fewer days; and no previous major cardiac diagnosis and AMI visits with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes 410, I21.3, or I121.9. Malpractice claims rates (MPCRs) were derived from the National Practitioner Database (NPD). The association between state-year level MPCR and admission rates for LRCP and AMI was estimated using state fixed-effects models. Standardized costs were inflation adjusted and are expressed in US dollar rate as of 2019. Results There were 40,482,813 ED visits during the 10-year study period, of which 2,275,757 (5.6%) were for chest pain, and 1,163,881 met LRCP criteria. Mean age of LRCP patients was 67.8 years, 60.9% were female, and 16.6% were hospitalized, at a mean cost of $17,120. During the same period, 75,266 (0.2%) visits were for AMI, with 87% admitted. The MPCR by state-year varied widely, from 2.6 to 8.6 claims per 100,000 population. A state fixed-effects model showed that an additional physician malpractice claim per 100,000 population was associated with a 3.66% (95% CI 2.02%-5.30%) increase in the admission rate of LRCP. An analogous model showed no association between MPCR and admission rates for AMI (-1.52%, 95% CI -4.06% to 1.02%). Conclusion Higher MPCRs are associated with increased admission rates for LRCP, at substantial cost, which may be attributable to defensive medicine in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Quinn
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Sukyung Chung
- Quantitative Science Unit, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - David Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Russ B, Arthur J, Lewis Z, Snead G. A REVIEW OF LAWSUITS RELATED TO POINT-OF-CARE EMERGENCY ULTRASOUND APPLICATIONS. J Emerg Med 2022; 63:661-672. [PMID: 35953324 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous investigators have assessed United States Case Law to evaluate the medicolegal risk surrounding point-of-care ultrasound applications. These studies have suggested that nonperformance is the primary source of an allegation of medical malpractice. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study is to update the literature regarding medical malpractice cases involving ultrasound applications that could be used at the point of care, and assess the risk conveyed to advanced practice providers and by application of emerging applications of ultrasound. METHODS Authors reviewed the Westlaw database for medical malpractice cases involving point-of-care ultrasound applications between December 2012 and January 2021. Cases were included if there was an allegation of misconduct by an emergency provider and if an ultrasound included in the American College of Emergency Physicians investigators core, extended, emerging, or adjunct applications was discussed to any degree. Investigators independently reviewed the cases for inclusion. Authors abstracted the case information, type of ultrasound performed, and the specific allegation of misconduct. RESULTS Nineteen cases met inclusion criteria. Seven cases involved core applications of emergency ultrasound and 13 involved extended, emerging, or adjunct applications. One case was included in both categories as it included elements of both core and extended applications. The most common primary allegation was failure to perform an ultrasound. No cases clearly alleged misinterpretation of a point-of-care ultrasound. CONCLUSION As previous studies have suggested, nonperformance of ultrasound seems to convey the greatest medicolegal risk. Extended, emerging, or adjunct applications of ultrasound may convey a slightly higher risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Russ
- Division of Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
| | - Jason Arthur
- Division of Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
| | - Zachary Lewis
- Division of Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Gregory Snead
- Division of Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quinn J, Kim D, Rice BT, Hao WD. Natural language processing to classify electrocardiograms in patients with syncope: A preliminary study. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5:e904. [PMID: 36324425 PMCID: PMC9621468 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James Quinn
- Department of Emergency MedicineStanford UniversityCaliforniaStanfordUSA
| | - David Kim
- Department of Emergency MedicineStanford UniversityCaliforniaStanfordUSA
| | - Brian Travis Rice
- Department of Emergency MedicineStanford UniversityCaliforniaStanfordUSA
| | - Wei David Hao
- Department of Emergency MedicineStanford UniversityCaliforniaStanfordUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Probst MA, Janke AT, Haimovich AD, Venkatesh AK, Lin MP, Kocher KE, Nemnom MJ, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V. Development of a Novel Emergency Department Quality Measure to Reduce Very Low-Risk Syncope Hospitalizations. Ann Emerg Med 2022; 79:509-517. [PMID: 35487840 PMCID: PMC9117517 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Emergency department (ED) evaluations for syncope are common, representing 1.3 million annual US visits and $2 billion in related hospitalizations. Despite evidence supporting risk stratification and outpatient management, variation in syncope hospitalization rates persist. We sought to develop a new quality measure for very low-risk adult ED patients with syncope that could be applied to administrative data. METHODS We developed this quality measure in 2 phases. First, we used an existing prospective, observational ED patient data set to identify a very low-risk cohort with unexplained syncope using 2 variables: age less than 50 years and no history of heart disease. We then applied this to the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) to assess its potential effect, assessing for hospital-level factors associated with hospitalization variation. RESULTS Of the 8,647 adult patients in the prospective cohort, 3,292 (38%) patients fulfilled these 2 criteria: age less than 50 years and no history of heart disease. Of these, 15 (0.46%) suffered serious adverse events within 30 days. In the NEDS, there were an estimated 566,031 patients meeting these 2 criteria, of whom 15,507 (2.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.48% to 3.00%) were hospitalized. We found substantial variation in the hospitalization rates for this very low-risk cohort, with a median rate of 1.7% (range 0% to 100%; interquartile range 0% to 3.9%). Factors associated with increased hospitalization rates included a yearly ED volume of more than 80,000 (odds ratio [OR] 3.14; 95% CI 2.02 to 4.89) and metropolitan teaching status (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.81). CONCLUSION In summary, our novel syncope quality measure can assess variation in low-value hospitalizations for unexplained syncope. The application of this measure could improve the value of syncope care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Probst
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| | - Alexander T Janke
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Adrian D Haimovich
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Michelle P Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Keith E Kocher
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Marie-Joe Nemnom
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Furlan L, Francesco PD, Costantino G, Montano N. Choosing Wisely in clinical practice: Embracing critical thinking, striving for safer care. J Intern Med 2022; 291:397-407. [PMID: 35307902 PMCID: PMC9314697 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the Choosing Wisely and Less is More campaigns have gained growing attention in the medical scientific community. Several projects have been launched to facilitate confrontation among patients and physicians, to achieve better and harmless patient-centered care. Such initiatives have paved the way to a new "way of thinking." Embracing such a philosophy goes through a cognitive process that takes into account several issues. Medicine is a highly inaccurate science and physicians should deal with uncertainty. Evidence from the literature should not be accepted as it is but rather be translated into practice by medical practitioners who select treatment options for specific cases based on the best research, patient preferences, and individual patient characteristics. A wise choice requires active effort into minimizing the chance that potential biases may affect our clinical decisions. Potential harms and all consequences (both direct and indirect) of prescribing tests, procedures, or medications should be carefully evaluated, as well as patients' needs and preferences. Through such a cognitive process, a patient management shift is needed, moving from being centered on establishing a diagnosis towards finding the best management strategy for the right patient at the right time. Finally, while "thinking wisely," physicians should also "act wisely," being among the leading actors in facing upcoming healthcare challenges related to environmental issues and social discrepancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovico Furlan
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine, General Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Di Francesco
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine, General Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Costantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department and Emergency Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Montano
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine, General Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baungaard N, Skovvang PL, Assing Hvidt E, Gerbild H, Kirstine Andersen M, Lykkegaard J. How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057169. [PMID: 35058268 PMCID: PMC8783809 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Defensive medicine has originally been defined as motivated by fear of malpractice litigation. However, the term is frequently used in Europe where most countries have a no-fault malpractice system. The objectives of this systematic review were to explore the definition of the term 'defensive medicine' in European original medical literature and to identify the motives stated therein. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase and Cochrane, 3 February 2020, with an updated search on 6 March 2021. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we reviewed all European original peer-reviewed studies fully or partially investigating 'defensive medicine'. RESULTS We identified a total of 50 studies. First, we divided these into two categories: the first category consisting of studies defining defensive medicine by using a narrow definition and the second category comprising studies in which defensive medicine was defined using a broad definition. In 23 of the studies(46%), defensive medicine was defined narrowly as: health professionals' deviation from sound medical practice motivated by a wish to reduce exposure to malpractice litigation. In 27 studies (54%), a broad definition was applied adding … or other self-protective motives. These self-protective motives, different from fear of malpractice litigation, were grouped into four categories: fear of patient dissatisfaction, fear of overlooking a severe diagnosis, fear of negative publicity and unconscious defensive medicine. Studies applying the narrow and broad definitions of defensive medicine did not differ regarding publication year, country, medical specialty, research quality or number of citations. CONCLUSIONS In European research, the narrow definition of defensive medicine as exclusively motivated by fear of litigation is often broadened to include other self-protective motives. In order to compare results pertaining to defensive medicine across countries, future studies are recommended to specify whether they are using the narrow or broad definition of defensive medicine. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020167215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Baungaard
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pia Ladeby Skovvang
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Elisabeth Assing Hvidt
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helle Gerbild
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Merethe Kirstine Andersen
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Lykkegaard
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Safari S, Khasraghi ZS, Chegeni MA, Ghabousian A, Amini A. The ability of Canadian Syncope risk score in differentiating cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic syncope; a cross-sectional study. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 50:675-678. [PMID: 34879485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Determining the underlying etiology of syncope provides valuable prognostic information and expedites the implementation of a therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) in differentiating cardiogenic and non-cardiac syncope. METHODS The present diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on adult patients with syncope, who presented to the emergency departments of Shohadaye Tajrish and Imam Hossein Hospitals in Tehran from March 2018 to March 2019. The data required for determining CSRS were collected during the initial assessment and the underlying etiology was confirmed through further diagnostic follow-up under the supervision of a cardiologist or neurologist. Finally, the screening performance characteristics of the score were calculated. RESULTS 300 patients with the mean age of 56.38 ± 19.10 years were studied. The source of syncope was cardiac in 133 (44.3%) and non-cardiac in 137 (55.7%) patients. The area under the ROC curve of CSRS in differentiating cardiac syncope was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.715-0.824). At a cutoff point of -1.5, the sensitivity and specificity of the score were calculated to be 73.68% (95% CI: 65.21-80.75%) and 73.05% (95%CI: 75.54-79.47%), respectively. CONCLUSION The present study reveals that CSRS has fair accuracy in differentiating the source of syncope and has no superiority over a clinical examination. Therefore, we do not recommend relying on the CSRS to differentiate between cardiac and non-cardiac syncope alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Safari
- Proteomics Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Emergency Medicine Department, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Soltanzadeh Khasraghi
- Emergency Medicine Department, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Ahmadi Chegeni
- Emergency Medicine Department, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Ghabousian
- Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Afshin Amini
- Emergency Medicine Department, Imam Hossein Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|