1
|
Seelye S, Cano J, Hogan CK, Prescott HC, Sussman JB. Social Determinants of Health and Risk-Adjusted Sepsis Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-09104-y. [PMID: 39375318 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09104-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Traditional risk prediction and risk adjustment models have focused on clinical characteristics, but accounting for social determinants of health (SDOH) and complex health conditions could improve understanding of sepsis outcomes and our ability to predict outcomes, treat patients, and assess quality of care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of SDOH and health scales in sepsis mortality risk prediction and hospital performance assessment. DESIGN Observational cohort study. SETTING One hundred twenty-nine hospitals in the nationwide Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System between 2017 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS Veterans admitted through emergency departments with community-acquired sepsis. EXPOSURES Individual- and community-level SDOH (race, housing instability, marital status, Area Deprivation Index [ADI], and rural residence) and two health scales (the Care Assessment Need [CAN] score and Claims-Based Frailty Index [CFI]). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was 90-day mortality from emergency department arrival; secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Among 144,889 patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired sepsis, 139,080 were men (96.0%), median (IQR) age was 71 (64-77) years, and median (IQR) ADI was 60 (38-81). Multivariable regression models had good calibration and discrimination across models that adjusted for different sets of variables (e.g., AUROC, 0.782; Brier score, 1.33; and standardized mortality rate, 1.00). Risk-adjusted hospital performance was similar across all models. Among 129 VA hospitals, three hospitals shifted from the lowest or highest quintile of performance when comparing models that excluded SDOH to models that adjusted for all variables. Models that adjusted for ADI reported odds ratios (CI) of 1.00 (1.00-1.00), indicating that ADI does not significantly predict sepsis mortality in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE In patients with community-acquired sepsis, adjusting for community SDOH variables such as ADI did not improve 90-day sepsis mortality predictions in mortality models and did not substantively alter hospital performance within the VA Healthcare System. Understanding the role of SDOH in risk prediction and risk adjustment models is vital because it could prevent hospitals from being negatively evaluated for treating less advantaged patients. However, we found that in VA hospitals, the potential impact of SDOH on 90-day sepsis mortality was minimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Jennifer Cano
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Cainnear K Hogan
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy B Sussman
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leung LY, Huang HL, Hung KK, Leung CY, Lam CC, Lo RS, Yeung CY, Tsoi PJ, Lai M, Brabrand M, Walline JH, Graham CA. Door-to-antibiotic time and mortality in patients with sepsis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med 2024:S0953-6205(24)00262-0. [PMID: 39034174 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether the timing of initial antibiotic administration in patients with sepsis in hospital affects mortality. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from inception up to 19 May 2022. Interventional and observational studies including adult human patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis and reported time of antibiotic administration with mortality were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Summary estimates were calculated by using random-effects model. The primary outcome was mortality. RESULTS We included 42 studies comprising 190,896 patients with sepsis. Pooled data showed that the OR for patient mortality who received antibiotics ≤1 hr was 0.83 (95 %CI: 0.67 to 1.04) when compared with patients who received antibiotics >1hr. Significant reductions in the risk of death in patients with earlier antibiotic administration were observed in patients ≤3 hrs versus >3 hrs (OR: 0.80, 95 %CI: 0.68 to 0.94) and ≤6 hrs vs 6 hrs (OR: 0.57, 95 %CI: 0.39 to 0.82). CONCLUSIONS Our findings show an improvement in mortality in sepsis patients with early administration of antibiotics at <3 and <6 hrs. Thus, these results suggest that antibiotics should be administered within 3 hrs of sepsis recognition or ED arrival regardless of the presence or absence of shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Yan Leung
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China
| | - Hsi-Lan Huang
- Department of Global Health Policy, The University of Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kevin Kc Hung
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China
| | - Chi Yan Leung
- Department of Global Health Policy, The University of Tokyo, Japan
| | - Cherry Cy Lam
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China
| | - Ronson Sl Lo
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China
| | - Chun Yu Yeung
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China
| | - Peter Joseph Tsoi
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China; James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Michael Lai
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mikkel Brabrand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Joseph H Walline
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China
| | - Colin A Graham
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chanderraj R, Admon AJ, He Y, Nuppnau M, Albin OR, Prescott HC, Dickson RP, Sjoding MW. Mortality of Patients With Sepsis Administered Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Cefepime. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:769-777. [PMID: 38739397 PMCID: PMC11091820 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Importance Experimental and observational studies have suggested that empirical treatment for bacterial sepsis with antianaerobic antibiotics (eg, piperacillin-tazobactam) is associated with adverse outcomes compared with anaerobe-sparing antibiotics (eg, cefepime). However, a recent pragmatic clinical trial of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime showed no difference in short-term outcomes at 14 days. Further studies are needed to help clarify the empirical use of these agents. Objective To examine the use of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with cefepime in 90-day mortality in patients treated empirically for sepsis, using instrumental variable analysis of a 15-month piperacillin-tazobactam shortage. Design, Setting, and Participants In a retrospective cohort study, hospital admissions at the University of Michigan from July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, including a piperacillin-tazobactam shortage period from June 12, 2015, to September 18, 2016, were examined. Adult patients with suspected sepsis treated with vancomycin and either piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime for conditions with presumed equipoise between piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime were included in the study. Data analysis was conducted from December 17, 2022, to April 11, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ failure-free, ventilator-free, and vasopressor-free days. The 15-month piperacillin-tazobactam shortage period was used as an instrumental variable for unmeasured confounding in antibiotic selection. Results Among 7569 patients (4174 men [55%]; median age, 63 [IQR 52-73] years) with sepsis meeting study eligibility, 4523 were treated with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam and 3046 were treated with vancomycin and cefepime. Of patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam, only 152 (3%) received it during the shortage. Treatment groups did not differ significantly in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, or time to antibiotic administration. In an instrumental variable analysis, piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with an absolute mortality increase of 5.0% at 90 days (95% CI, 1.9%-8.1%) and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4-2.7) fewer organ failure-free days, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.57-1.62) fewer ventilator-free days, and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.01-2.01) fewer vasopressor-free days. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with suspected sepsis and no clear indication for antianaerobic coverage, administration of piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with higher mortality and increased duration of organ dysfunction compared with cefepime. These findings suggest that the widespread use of empirical antianaerobic antibiotics in sepsis may be harmful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Chanderraj
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Medicine Service, Infectious Diseases Section, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Andrew J. Admon
- Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ying He
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Mark Nuppnau
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Owen R. Albin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Robert P. Dickson
- Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Michael W. Sjoding
- Weil Institute for Critical Care Research & Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ginestra JC, Coz Yataco AO, Dugar SP, Dettmer MR. Hospital-Onset Sepsis Warrants Expanded Investigation and Consideration as a Unique Clinical Entity. Chest 2024; 165:1421-1430. [PMID: 38246522 PMCID: PMC11177099 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Sepsis causes more than a quarter million deaths among hospitalized adults in the United States each year. Although most cases of sepsis are present on admission, up to one-quarter of patients with sepsis develop this highly morbid and mortal condition while hospitalized. Compared with patients with community-onset sepsis (COS), patients with hospital-onset sepsis (HOS) are twice as likely to require mechanical ventilation and ICU admission, have more than two times longer ICU and hospital length of stay, accrue five times higher hospital costs, and are twice as likely to die. Patients with HOS differ from those with COS with respect to underlying comorbidities, admitting diagnosis, clinical manifestations of infection, and severity of illness. Despite the differences between these patient populations, patients with HOS sepsis are understudied and warrant expanded investigation. Here, we outline important knowledge gaps in the recognition and management of HOS in adults and propose associated research priorities for investigators. Of particular importance are questions regarding standardization of research and clinical case identification, understanding of clinical heterogeneity among patients with HOS, development of tailored management recommendations, identification of impactful prevention strategies, optimization of care delivery and quality metrics, identification and correction of disparities in care and outcomes, and how to ensure goal-concordant care for patients with HOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Ginestra
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Angel O Coz Yataco
- Division of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Siddharth P Dugar
- Division of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Matthew R Dettmer
- Division of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Center for Emergency Medicine, Emergency Services Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hechtman RK, Kipnis P, Cano J, Seelye S, Liu VX, Prescott HC. Heterogeneity of Benefit from Earlier Time-to-Antibiotics for Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 209:852-860. [PMID: 38261986 PMCID: PMC10995570 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1800oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Shorter time-to-antibiotics improves survival from sepsis, particularly among patients in shock. There may be other subgroups for whom faster antibiotics are particularly beneficial.Objectives: Identify patient characteristics associated with greater benefit from shorter time-to-antibiotics.Methods: Observational cohort study of patients hospitalized with community-onset sepsis at 173 hospitals and treated with antimicrobials within 12 hours. We used three approaches to evaluate heterogeneity of benefit from shorter time-to-antibiotics: 1) conditional average treatment effects of shorter (⩽3 h) versus longer (>3-12 h) time-to-antibiotics on 30-day mortality using multivariable Poisson regression; 2) causal forest to identify characteristics associated with greatest benefit from shorter time-to-antibiotics; and 3) logistic regression with time-to-antibiotics modeled as a spline.Measurements and Main Results: Among 273,255 patients with community-onset sepsis, 131,094 (48.0%) received antibiotics within 3 hours. In Poisson models, shorter time-to-antibiotics was associated with greater absolute mortality reduction among patients with metastatic cancer (5.0% [95% confidence interval; CI: 4.3-5.7] vs. 0.4% [95% CI: 0.2-0.6] for patients without cancer, P < 0.001); patients with shock (7.0% [95% CI: 5.8-8.2%] vs. 2.8% [95% CI: 2.7-3.5%] for patients without shock, P = 0.005); and patients with more acute organ dysfunctions (4.8% [95% CI: 3.9-5.6%] for three or more dysfunctions vs. 0.5% [95% CI: 0.3-0.8] for one dysfunction, P < 0.001). In causal forest, metastatic cancer and shock were associated with greatest benefit from shorter time-to-antibiotics. Spline analysis confirmed differential nonlinear associations of time-to-antibiotics with mortality in patients with metastatic cancer and shock.Conclusions: In patients with community-onset sepsis, the mortality benefit of shorter time-to-antibiotics varied by patient characteristics. These findings suggest that shorter time-to-antibiotics for sepsis is particularly important among patients with cancer and/or shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K. Hechtman
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California; and
| | - Jennifer Cano
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Vincent X. Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California; and
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rhee C, Strich JR, Chiotos K, Classen DC, Cosgrove SE, Greeno R, Heil EL, Kadri SS, Kalil AC, Gilbert DN, Masur H, Septimus EJ, Sweeney DA, Terry A, Winslow DL, Yealy DM, Klompas M. Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:505-513. [PMID: 37831591 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) as a pay-for-reporting measure in 2015 and is now planning to make it a pay-for-performance measure by incorporating it into the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. This joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIPD position paper highlights concerns with this change. Multiple studies indicate that SEP-1 implementation was associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use, lactate measurements, and aggressive fluid resuscitation for patients with suspected sepsis but not with decreased mortality rates. Increased focus on SEP-1 risks further diverting attention and resources from more effective measures and comprehensive sepsis care. We recommend retiring SEP-1 rather than using it in a payment model and shifting instead to new sepsis metrics that focus on patient outcomes. CMS is developing a community-onset sepsis 30-day mortality electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) that is an important step in this direction. The eCQM preliminarily identifies sepsis using systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, antibiotic administrations or diagnosis codes for infection or sepsis, and clinical indicators of acute organ dysfunction. We support the eCQM but recommend removing SIRS criteria and diagnosis codes to streamline implementation, decrease variability between hospitals, maintain vigilance for patients with sepsis but without SIRS, and avoid promoting antibiotic use in uninfected patients with SIRS. We further advocate for CMS to harmonize the eCQM with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Adult Sepsis Event surveillance metric to promote unity in federal measures, decrease reporting burden for hospitals, and facilitate shared prevention initiatives. These steps will result in a more robust measure that will encourage hospitals to pay more attention to the full breadth of sepsis care, stimulate new innovations in diagnosis and treatment, and ultimately bring us closer to our shared goal of improving outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanu Rhee
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Strich
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen Chiotos
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David C Classen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sara E Cosgrove
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ron Greeno
- Society of Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily L Heil
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sameer S Kadri
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Andre C Kalil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - David N Gilbert
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Henry Masur
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Edward J Septimus
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel A Sweeney
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Aisha Terry
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Dean L Winslow
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Donald M Yealy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Donnelly JP, Seelye SM, Kipnis P, McGrath BM, Iwashyna TJ, Pogue J, Jones M, Liu VX, Prescott HC. Impact of Reducing Time-to-Antibiotics on Sepsis Mortality, Antibiotic Use, and Adverse Events. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2024; 21:94-101. [PMID: 37934602 PMCID: PMC10867916 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202306-505oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Shorter time-to-antibiotics is lifesaving in sepsis, but programs to hasten antibiotic delivery may increase unnecessary antibiotic use and adverse events. Objectives: We sought to estimate both the benefits and harms of shortening time-to-antibiotics for sepsis. Methods: We conducted a simulation study using a cohort of 1,559,523 hospitalized patients admitted through the emergency department with meeting two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (2013-2018). Reasons for hospitalization were classified as septic shock, sepsis, infection, antibiotics stopped early, and never treated (no antibiotics within 48 h). We simulated the impact of a 50% reduction in time-to-antibiotics for sepsis across 12 hospital scenarios defined by sepsis prevalence (low, medium, or high) and magnitude of "spillover" antibiotic prescribing to patients without infection (low, medium, high, or very high). Outcomes included mortality and adverse events potentially attributable to antibiotics (e.g., allergy, organ dysfunction, Clostridiodes difficile infection, and culture with multidrug-resistant organism). Results: A total of 933,458 (59.9%) hospitalized patients received antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours of presentation, including 38,572 (2.5%) with septic shock, 276,082 (17.7%) with sepsis, 370,705 (23.8%) with infection, and 248,099 (15.9%) with antibiotics stopped early. A total of 199,937 (12.8%) hospitalized patients experienced an adverse event; most commonly, acute liver injury (5.6%), new MDRO (3.5%), and Clostridiodes difficile infection (1.7%). Across the scenarios, a 50% reduction in time-to-antibiotics for sepsis was associated with a median of 1 to 180 additional antibiotic-treated patients and zero to seven additional adverse events per death averted from sepsis. Conclusions: The impacts of faster time-to-antibiotics for sepsis vary markedly across simulated hospital types. However, even in the worst-case scenario, new antibiotic-associated adverse events were rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Donnelly
- Department of Learning Health Sciences
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- VA Center for Implementation and Evaluation Resources, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah M. Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Brenda M. McGrath
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- Department of Internal Medicine, and
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jason Pogue
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Makoto Jones
- Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah; and
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Vincent X. Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, and
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Locke BW, Brown J. What Are We Aiming for in Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure? Respir Care 2023; 68:1775-1778. [PMID: 38007234 PMCID: PMC10676247 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W Locke
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jeanette Brown
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lóser MK, Horowitz JK, England P, Esteitie R, Kaatz S, McLaughlin E, Munroe E, Heath M, Posa P, Flanders SA, Prescott HC. Institutional Structures and Processes to Support Sepsis Care: A Multihospital Study. Crit Care Explor 2023; 5:e1004. [PMID: 37954901 PMCID: PMC10637402 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000001004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify opportunities for improving hospital-based sepsis care and to inform an ongoing statewide quality improvement initiative in Michigan. DESIGN Surveys on hospital sepsis processes, including a self-assessment of practices using a 3-point Likert scale, were administered to 51 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, a Collaborative Quality Initiative sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, at two time points (2020, 2022). Forty-eight hospitals also submitted sepsis protocols for structured review. SETTING Multicenter quality improvement consortium. SUBJECTS Fifty-one hospitals in Michigan. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of the included hospitals, 92.2% (n = 47/51) were nonprofit, 88.2% (n = 45/51) urban, 11.8% (n = 6/51) rural, and 80.4% (n = 41/51) teaching hospitals. One hundred percent (n = 51/51) responded to the survey, and 94.1% (n = 48/51) provided a sepsis policy/protocol. All surveyed hospitals used at least one quality improvement approach, including audit/feedback (98.0%, n = 50/51) and/or clinician education (68.6%, n = 35/51). Protocols included the Sepsis-1 (18.8%, n = 9/48) or Sepsis-2 (31.3%, n = 15/48) definitions; none (n = 0/48) used Sepsis-3. All hospitals (n = 51/51) used at least one process to facilitate rapid sepsis treatment, including order sets (96.1%, n = 49/51) and/or stocking of commonly used antibiotics in at least one clinical setting (92.2%, n = 47/51). Treatment protocols included guidance on antimicrobial therapy (68.8%, n = 33/48), fluid resuscitation (70.8%, n = 34/48), and vasopressor administration (62.5%, n = 30/48). On self-assessment, hospitals reported the lowest scores for peridischarge practices, including screening for cognitive impairment (2.0%, n = 1/51 responded "we are good at this") and providing anticipatory guidance (3.9%, n = 2/51). There were no meaningful associations of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Management Bundle performance with differences in hospital characteristics or sepsis policy document characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Most hospitals used audit/feedback, order sets, and clinician education to facilitate sepsis care. Hospitals did not consistently incorporate organ dysfunction criteria into sepsis definitions. Existing processes focused on early recognition and treatment rather than recovery-based practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan K Lóser
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Peter England
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Rania Esteitie
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Covenant Healthcare, Saginaw, MI
| | - Scott Kaatz
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | | - Elizabeth Munroe
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Megan Heath
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Pat Posa
- Quality and Patient Safety Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Scott A Flanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lyons PG, Hough CL. Antimicrobials in Sepsis: Time to Pay Attention to When Delays Happen. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:1239-1241. [PMID: 37655955 PMCID: PMC10502879 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202306-519ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G Lyons
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, and
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Catherine L Hough
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Karlic KJ, Clouse TL, Hogan CK, Garland A, Seelye S, Sussman JB, Prescott HC. Comparison of Administrative versus Electronic Health Record-based Methods for Identifying Sepsis Hospitalizations. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:1309-1315. [PMID: 37163757 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202302-105oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Despite the importance of sepsis surveillance, no optimal approach for identifying sepsis hospitalizations exists. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event Definition (CDC-ASE) is an electronic medical record-based algorithm that yields more stable estimates over time than diagnostic coding-based approaches but may still result in misclassification. Objectives: We sought to assess three approaches to identifying sepsis hospitalizations, including a modified CDC-ASE. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients in the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System admitted via the emergency department (February 2021 to February 2022) with at least one episode of acute organ dysfunction within 48 hours of emergency department presentation. Patients were assessed for community-onset sepsis using three methods: 1) explicit diagnosis codes, 2) the CDC-ASE, and 3) a modified CDC-ASE. The modified CDC-ASE required at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria instead of blood culture collection and had a more sensitive definition of respiratory dysfunction. Each method was compared with a reference standard of physician adjudication via medical record review. Patients were considered to have sepsis if they had at least one episode of acute organ dysfunction graded as "definitely" or "probably" infection related on physician review. Results: Of 821 eligible hospitalizations, 449 were selected for physician review. Of these, 98 (21.8%) were classified as sepsis by medical record review, 103 (22.9%) by the CDC-ASE, 132 (29.4%) by the modified CDC-ASE, and 37 (8.2%) by diagnostic codes. Accuracy was similar across the three methods of interest (80.6% for the CDC-ASE, 79.6% for the modified CDC-ADE, and 84.2% for diagnostic codes), but sensitivity and specificity varied. The CDC-ASE algorithm had sensitivity of 58.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.2-68.1%) and specificity of 86.9% (95% CI, 82.9-90.2%). The modified CDC-ASE algorithm had greater sensitivity (69.4% [95% CI, 59.3-78.3%]) but lower specificity (81.8% [95% CI, 77.3-85.7%]). Diagnostic codes had lower sensitivity (32.7% [95% CI, 23.5-42.9%]) but greater specificity (98.6% [95% CI, 96.7-99.55%]). Conclusions: There are several approaches to identifying sepsis hospitalizations for surveillance that have acceptable accuracy. These approaches yield varying sensitivity and specificity, so investigators should carefully consider the test characteristics of each method before determining an appropriate method for their intended use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Karlic
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Tori L Clouse
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Cainnear K Hogan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Allan Garland
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sarah Seelye
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Jeremy B Sussman
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hechtman RK, Cano J, Whittington T, Hogan CK, Seelye SM, Sussman JB, Prescott HC. A Multi-Hospital Survey of Current Practices for Supporting Recovery From Sepsis. Crit Care Explor 2023; 5:e0926. [PMID: 37637354 PMCID: PMC10456977 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Sepsis survivors are at increased risk for morbidity and functional impairment. There are recommended practices to support recovery after sepsis, but it is unclear how often they are implemented. We sought to assess the current use of recovery-based practices across hospitals. DESIGN Electronic survey assessing the use of best practices for recovery from COVID-related and non-COVID-related sepsis. Questions included four-point Likert responses of "never" to "always/nearly always." SETTING Twenty-six veterans affairs hospitals with the highest (n = 13) and lowest (n = 13) risk-adjusted 90-day sepsis survival. SUBJECTS Inpatient and outpatient clinician leaders. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS For each domain, we calculated the proportion of "always/nearly always" responses and mean Likert scores. We assessed for differences by hospital survival, COVID versus non-COVID sepsis, and sepsis case volume. Across eight domains of care, the proportion "always/nearly always" responses ranged from: 80.7% (social support) and 69.8% (medication management) to 22.5% (physical recovery and adaptation) and 0.0% (emotional support). Higher-survival hospitals more often performed screening for new symptoms/limitations (49.2% vs 35.1% "always/nearly always," p = 0.02) compared with lower-survival hospitals. There was no difference in "always/nearly always" responses for COVID-related versus non-COVID-related sepsis, but small differences in mean Likert score in four domains: care coordination (3.34 vs 3.48, p = 0.01), medication management (3.59 vs 3.65, p = 0.04), screening for new symptoms/limitations (3.13 vs 3.20, p = 0.02), and anticipatory guidance and education (2.97 vs 2.84, p < 0.001). Lower case volume hospitals more often performed care coordination (72.7% vs 43.8% "always/nearly always," p = 0.02), screening for new symptoms/limitations (60.6% vs 35.8%, p < 0.001), and social support (100% vs 74.2%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our findings show variable adoption of practices for sepsis recovery. Future work is needed to understand why some practice domains are employed more frequently than others, and how to facilitate practice implementation, particularly within rarely adopted domains such as emotional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Cano
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Sarah M Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeremy B Sussman
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Denstaedt SJ, Cano J, Wang XQ, Donnelly JP, Seelye S, Prescott HC. Blood count derangements after sepsis and association with post-hospital outcomes. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1133351. [PMID: 36936903 PMCID: PMC10018394 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale Predicting long-term outcomes in sepsis survivors remains a difficult task. Persistent inflammation post-sepsis is associated with increased risk for rehospitalization and death. As surrogate markers of inflammation, complete blood count parameters measured at hospital discharge may have prognostic value for sepsis survivors. Objective To determine the incremental value of complete blood count parameters over clinical characteristics for predicting 90-day outcomes in sepsis survivors. Methods Electronic health record data was used to identify sepsis hospitalizations at United States Veterans Affairs hospitals with live discharge and relevant laboratory data (2013 to 2018). We measured the association of eight complete blood count parameters with 90-day outcomes (mortality, rehospitalization, cause-specific rehospitalizations) using multivariable logistic regression models. Measurements and main results We identified 155,988 eligible hospitalizations for sepsis. Anemia (93.6%, N=142,162) and lymphopenia (28.1%, N=29,365) were the most common blood count abnormalities at discharge. In multivariable models, all parameters were associated with the primary outcome of 90-day mortality or rehospitalization and improved model discrimination above clinical characteristics alone (likelihood ratio test, p<0.02 for all). A model including all eight parameters significantly improved discrimination (AUROC, 0.6929 v. 0.6756) and reduced calibration error for the primary outcome. Hemoglobin had the greatest prognostic separation with a 1.5 fold increased incidence of the primary outcome in the lowest quintile (7.2-8.9 g/dL) versus highest quintile (12.70-15.80 g/dL). Hemoglobin and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio provided the most added value in predicting the primary outcome and 90-day mortality alone, respectively. Absolute lymphocyte count added little value in predicting 90-day outcomes. Conclusions The incorporation of discharge complete blood count parameters into prognostic scoring systems could improve prediction of 90-day outcomes. Hemoglobin had the greatest prognostic value for the primary composite outcome of 90-day rehospitalization or mortality. Absolute lymphocyte count provided little added value in multivariable model comparisons, including for infection- or sepsis-related rehospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott J. Denstaedt
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jennifer Cano
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Xiao Qing Wang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - John P. Donnelly
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sarah Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kohne JG, MacLaren G, Shellhaas RA, Benedetti G, Barbaro RP. Variation in electroencephalography and neuroimaging for children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care 2023; 27:23. [PMID: 36650540 PMCID: PMC9847194 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04293-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seizures, strokes, and intracranial hemorrhage are common and feared complications in children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Researchers and clinicians have proposed and deployed methods for monitoring and detecting neurologic injury, but best practices are unknown. We sought to characterize clinicians' approach to electroencephalography (EEG) and brain imaging modalities in children supported by ECMO. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational cohort study among US Children's Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) from 2016 to 2021. We identified hospitalizations containing ECMO support. We stratified these admissions by pediatric, neonatal, cardiac surgery, and non-cardiac surgery. We characterized the frequency of EEG, cranial ultrasound, brain computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transcranial Doppler during ECMO hospitalizations. We reported key diagnoses (stroke and seizures) and the prescription of antiseizure medication. To assess hospital variation, we created multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS We identified 8746 ECMO hospitalizations. Nearly all children under 1 year of age (5389/5582) received a cranial ultrasound. Sixty-two percent of the cohort received an EEG, and use increased from 2016 to 2021 (52-72% of hospitalizations). There was marked variation between hospitals in rates of EEG use. Rates of antiseizure medication use (37% of hospitalizations) and seizure diagnoses (20% of hospitalizations) were similar across hospitals, including high and low EEG utilization hospitals. Overall, 37% of the cohort received a CT and 36% received an MRI (46% of neonatal patients). Stroke diagnoses (16% of hospitalizations) were similar between high- and low-MRI utilization hospitals (15% vs 17%, respectively). Transcranial Doppler (TCD) was performed in just 8% of hospitalizations, and 77% of the patients who received a TCD were cared for at one of five centers. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of children at high risk of neurologic injury, there was significant variation in the approach to EEG and neuroimaging in children on ECMO. Despite the variation in monitoring and imaging, diagnoses of seizures and strokes were similar across hospitals. Future work needs to identify a management strategy that appropriately screens and monitors this high-risk population without overuse of resource-intensive modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph G. Kohne
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA ,grid.214458.e0000000086837370Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- grid.410759.e0000 0004 0451 6143Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Renée A. Shellhaas
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Giulia Benedetti
- grid.240741.40000 0000 9026 4165Department of Neurology, Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Ryan P. Barbaro
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA ,grid.214458.e0000000086837370Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wayne MT, Valley TS, Arenberg DA, De Cardenas J, Prescott HC. Temporal Trends and Variation in Bronchoscopy Use for Acute Respiratory Failure in the United States. Chest 2023; 163:128-138. [PMID: 36007595 PMCID: PMC9859725 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National data on bronchoscopy for the evaluation of acute respiratory failure are lacking, and the limited available data suggest wide variation in use. RESEARCH QUESTION How commonly is bronchoscopy performed among hospitalizations with acute respiratory failure? How has use changed over time and across hospitals? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This was an observational cohort study of adult hospitalizations (2012-2018) treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using the National Inpatient Sample, which represents 97% of all hospitalizations in the United States. We measured the proportion of hospitalizations treated with IMV who underwent bronchoscopy and assessed trends in bronchoscopy use over time. Multilevel linear regression models were used to quantify hospital-level variation, adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS We identified 6,101,070 IMV-treated hospitalizations (2012-2018), of whom 609,405 underwent bronchoscopy; among hospitalizations receiving bronchoscopy, mean age was 61 years, 41.8% were women, and in-hospital mortality was 30.8%. The percentage of IMV-treated hospitalizations receiving bronchoscopy increased from 9.5% (95% CI, 9.1%-9.9%) in 2012 to 10.8% (95% CI, 10.4%-11.2%) in 2018 (P < .001 for difference). In 2018, bronchoscopy use varied from 0% to 57.1% among 1,787 hospitals, and in multilevel models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, 16.0% of the variation was explained at the hospital level. The median OR was 2.13 (95% CI, 2.05-2.21), indicating 113% increased odds of receiving bronchoscopy if moving from a lower-use to a higher-use hospital. INTERPRETATION Bronchoscopy use among hospitalizations treated with IMV has increased over time. The large variation in use of bronchoscopy across hospitals suggests potentially unwarranted practice variation and need for further studies to clarify which patients benefit from bronchoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max T Wayne
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Thomas S Valley
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Douglas A Arenberg
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jose De Cardenas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Klompas M, Rhee C. Antibiotics: it is all about timing, isn't it? Curr Opin Crit Care 2022; 28:513-521. [PMID: 35942689 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Sepsis guidelines and quality measures set aggressive deadlines for administering antibiotics to patients with possible sepsis or septic shock. However, the diagnosis of sepsis is often uncertain, particularly upon initial presentation, and pressure to treat more rapidly may harm some patients by exposing them to unnecessary or inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics. RECENT FINDINGS Observational studies that report that each hour until antibiotics increases mortality often fail to adequately adjust for comorbidities and severity of illness, fail to account for antibiotics given to uninfected patients, and inappropriately blend the effects of long delays with short delays. Accounting for these factors weakens or eliminates the association between time-to-antibiotics and mortality, especially for patients without shock. These findings are underscored by analyses of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services SEP-1 measure: it has increased sepsis diagnoses and broad-spectrum antibiotic use but has not improved outcomes. SUMMARY Clinicians are advised to tailor the urgency of antibiotics to their certainty of infection and patients' severity of illness. Immediate antibiotics are warranted for patients with possible septic shock or high likelihood of infection. Antibiotics can safely be withheld to allow for more investigation, however, in most patients with less severe illnesses if the diagnosis of infection is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Chanu Rhee
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Klompas M, Goldberg SA. Turning Back the Clock: Prehospital Antibiotics for Patients With Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:1537-1540. [PMID: 36106973 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Scott A Goldberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ginestra JC, Kohn R, Hubbard RA, Crane-Droesch A, Halpern SD, Kerlin MP, Weissman GE. Association of Unit Census with Delays in Antimicrobial Initiation among Ward Patients with Hospital-acquired Sepsis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19:1525-1533. [PMID: 35312462 PMCID: PMC9447380 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202112-1360oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Patients with hospital-acquired sepsis (HAS) experience higher mortality and delayed care compared with those with community-acquired sepsis. Capacity strain, the extent to which demand for hospital resources exceeds availability, thus impacting patient care, is a possible mechanism underlying antimicrobial delays for HAS but has not been studied. Objectives: Assess the association of ward census with the timing of antimicrobial initiation among ward patients with HAS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized at five acute care hospitals between July 2017 and December 2019 who developed ward-onset HAS, distinguished from community-acquired sepsis by onset after 48 hours of hospitalization. The primary exposure was ward census, measured as the number of patients present in each ward at each hour, standardized by quarter and year. The primary outcome was time from sepsis onset to antimicrobial initiation. We used quantile regression to assess the association between ward census at sepsis onset and time to antimicrobial initiation among patients with HAS defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event criteria. We adjusted for hospital, year, quarter, age, sex, race, ethnicity, severity of illness, admission diagnosis, and service type. Results: A total of 1,672 hospitalizations included at least one ward-onset HAS episode. Median time to antimicrobial initiation after HAS onset was 4.1 hours (interquartile range, 0.4-22.3). Marginal adjusted time to antimicrobial initiation ranged from 3.6 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-4.8 h) to 6.8 hours (95% CI, 5.3-8.4 h) at census levels 2 standard deviations (SDs) below and above the ward-specific mean, respectively. Each 1-SD increase in ward census at sepsis onset, representing a median of 2.4 patients, was associated with an increase in time to antimicrobial initiation of 0.80 hours (95% CI, 0.32-1.29 h). In sensitivity analyses, results were consistent across severity of illness and electronic health record-based sepsis definitions. Conclusions: Time to antimicrobial initiation increased with increasing census among ward patients with HAS. These findings suggest that delays in care for HAS may be related to ward capacity strain as measured by census. Additional work is needed to validate these findings and identify potential mechanisms operating through clinician behavior and care delivery processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C. Ginestra
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Rachel Kohn
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Rebecca A. Hubbard
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Crane-Droesch
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Scott D. Halpern
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Meeta Prasad Kerlin
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Gary E. Weissman
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Prescott HC, Seelye S, Wang XQ, Hogan CK, Smith JT, Kipnis P, Barreda F, Donnelly JP, Pogue JM, Iwashyna TJ, Jones MM, Liu VX. Temporal Trends in Antimicrobial Prescribing During Hospitalization for Potential Infection and Sepsis. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:805-813. [PMID: 35759274 PMCID: PMC9237797 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance Some experts have cautioned that national and health system emphasis on rapid administration of antimicrobials for sepsis may increase overall antimicrobial use even among patients without sepsis. Objective To assess whether temporal changes in antimicrobial timing for sepsis are associated with increasing antimicrobial use, days of therapy, or broadness of antimicrobial coverage among all hospitalized patients at risk for sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants This is an observational cohort study of hospitalized patients at 152 hospitals in 2 health care systems during 2013 to 2018, admitted via the emergency department with 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Data analysis was performed from June 10, 2021, to March 22, 2022. Exposures Hospital-level temporal trends in time to first antimicrobial administration. Outcomes Antimicrobial outcomes included antimicrobial use, days of therapy, and broadness of antibacterial coverage. Clinical outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and new multidrug-resistant (MDR) organism culture positivity. Results Among 1 559 523 patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department with 2 or more SIRS criteria (1 269 998 male patients [81.4%]; median [IQR] age, 67 [59-77] years), 273 255 (17.5%) met objective criteria for sepsis. In multivariable models adjusted for patient characteristics, the adjusted median (IQR) time to first antimicrobial administration to patients with sepsis decreased by 37 minutes, from 4.7 (4.1-5.3) hours in 2013 to 3.9 (3.6-4.4) hours in 2018, although the slope of decrease varied across hospitals. During the same period, antimicrobial use within 48 hours, days of antimicrobial therapy, and receipt of broad-spectrum coverage decreased among the broader cohort of patients with SIRS. In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, new MDR culture positivity, and new MDR blood culture positivity decreased over the study period among both patients with sepsis and those with SIRS. When examining hospital-specific trends, decreases in antimicrobial use, days of therapy, and broadness of antibacterial coverage for patients with SIRS did not differ by hospital antimicrobial timing trend for sepsis. Overall, there was no evidence that accelerating antimicrobial timing for sepsis was associated with increasing antimicrobial use or impaired antimicrobial stewardship. Conclusions and Relevance In this multihospital cohort study, the time to first antimicrobial for sepsis decreased over time, but this trend was not associated with increasing antimicrobial use, days of therapy, or broadness of antimicrobial coverage among the broader population at-risk for sepsis, which suggests that shortening the time to antibiotics for sepsis is feasible without leading to indiscriminate antimicrobial use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hallie C. Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Xiao Qing Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Joshua T. Smith
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Fernando Barreda
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - John P. Donnelly
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Jason M. Pogue
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Makoto M. Jones
- Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Vincent X. Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|