Assessment of Hearing Screening Combined With Limited and Expanded Genetic Screening for Newborns in Nantong, China

A novel intronic variant causing aberrant splicing identified in two deaf Chinese siblings with enlarged vestibular aqueducts

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the genotype-phenotype relationship in two Chinese family members with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA).

METHODS

We collected blood samples and clinical data from each pedigree family member. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes using standard methods. Targeted next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing were performed to find the pathogenic mutation in this family. Minigene assays were used to verify whether the novel intronic mutation SLC26A4c.765+4A>G influenced mRNA splicing.

RESULTS

Hearing loss in the patients with EVA was diagnosed using auditory tests and imaging examinations. Two pathogenic mutations, c.765+4A>G and c.919-2A>G were detected in SLC26A4. In vitro minigene analysis confirmed that c.765+4A>G variant could cause aberrant splicing, resulting in skipping over exon 6.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLC26A4c.765+4A>G mutation is the causative variant in the Chinese family with EVA. Particular attention should be paid to intronic variants.

Multicolor melting curve analysis discloses high carrier frequency of hearing loss-associated variants among neonates in Jiangsu province

BACKGROUND

Genetic disorders ascribe to half of cases of congenital hearing loss. Hearing screening is significant in detecting hearing loss (HL) but weak at diagnosis, which can be complemented by genetic screening.

METHODS

To find a feasible method to accomplish genetic screening and evaluate its advantage when combined with hearing screening, between 1 January 2022, and 10 December 2023, we performed an observational cohort study based on 2488 neonates from the Han population at three hospitals in Jiangsu province. Genetic screening for 20 variants in four common HL-associated genes by multicolor melting curve analysis (MMCA) and hearing screening were offered concurrently to all participants.

RESULTS

In total, 170 (6.8%) of 2488 eligible neonates were detected at least one variant and among them, the proportion of referral was higher (p < 0.05). Genetic screening combined with hearing screening was associated with a 25.0% increase (2 of 8) in discovering cases of diagnosed hearing loss that were missed by hearing screening.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that genetic screening combined with hearing screening by MMCA is effective at finding potential HL cases and practical to be validated in other places.

Genetic screening of 15 hearing loss variants in 77,647 neonates with clinical follow-up

BACKGROUND

To analyze the genotype distribution and frequency of hearing loss genes in newborn population and evaluate the clinical value of genetic screening policy in China.

METHODS

Genetic screening for hearing loss was offered to 84,029 neonates between March 2019 and December 2021, of whom 77,647 newborns accepted the screening program with one-year follow-up. The genotyping of 15 hot spot variants in GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 was performed on microarray platform.

RESULTS

A total of 3.05% (2369/77,647) newborns carried at least one genetic hearing loss-associated variant, indicated for early preventive management. The carrier frequency of GJB2 gene was the highest, at 1.48% (1147/77,647), followed by SLC26A4 gene at 1.07% (831/77,647), and GJB3 gene at 0.23% (181/77,647). GJB2 c.235delC variant and SLC26A4 IVS7-2A>G variant were the most common allelic variants with allele frequency of 0.6304% (979/155,294) and 0.3992% (620/155,294), respectively. 10 children are identified as homozygous or compound heterozygous for pathogenic variants (4 in GJB2, 6 in SLC26A4), and 7 of these infants had passed the hearing screening. Following up of the genetically screened newborns revealed that genetic screening detected more hearing-impaired infants than hearing screening alone. Genetic screening helped identify the infants who had passed the initial hearing screening, and reduced time for diagnosis and intervention of hearing aid. In addition, we identified 234 newborns (0.30%, 234/77,647) susceptible to preventable aminoglycoside antibiotic ototoxicity undetectable by hearing screening.

CONCLUSION

We performed the largest-scale neonatal carrier screening for hearing loss genes in Southeast China. Our results indicated that genetic screening is an important complementation to conventional hearing screening. Our practice and experience may facilitate the application and development of neonatal genetic screening policy in mainland China.

Analysis of audiological outcomes of children referred from a universal newborn hearing screening program over 9 years in Beijing, China

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and audiological diagnosis are crucial for children with congenital hearing loss (HL). The objective of this study was to analyze hearing screening techniques, audiological outcomes and risk factors among children referred from a UNHS program in Beijing. A retrospective analysis was performed in children who were referred to our hospital after failing UNHS during a 9-year period. A series of audiological diagnostic tests were administered to each case, to confirm and determine the type and degree of HL. Risk factors for HL were collected. Of 1839 cases, 53.0% were referred after only transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) testing, 46.1% were screened by a combination of TEOAE and automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) testing, and 1.0% were referred after only AABR testing. HL was confirmed in 55.7% of cases. Ears with screening results that led to referral experienced a more severe degree of HL than those with results that passed. Risk factors for HL were identified in 113 (6.1%) cases. The main risk factors included craniofacial anomalies (2.7%), length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit longer than 5 days (2.4%) and birth weight less than 1500 g (0.8%). The statistical data showed that age (P < 0.001) and risk factors, including craniofacial anomalies (P < 0.001) and low birth weight (P = 0.048), were associated with the presence of HL. This study suggested that hearing screening plays an important role in the early detection of HL and that children with risk factors should be closely monitored.

Analysis of SLC26A4 Gene in Individuals with Non Syndromic Hearing Impairment in Relation with GJB2 Associated Mutations

Background

Hearing Loss (HL) is the most common sensory disorder. HL commonly ranges from mild to severe. Persons with HL face difficulty in hearing conversations or sounds through one ear or both ears, which impacts one's ability to interact with others. Hence it is a communicable disorder that makes people socially isolated, lonely, and frustrated. HL in children severely affects language development. The people who are referred to as 'Deaf' with very little or no hearing capabilities, are considered as having profound hearing loss. More than 124 genes are causative for Non-Syndromic HL (NSHL) with varying inheritance, among which the SLC26A4 mutations are the second commonest cause of hereditary HL across the globe.

Methods

Samples from 70 NSHL patients were analyzed through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and generated five pathogenic variants [N246fs (rs918684449), K564fs (rs746427774), F122fs, V239D (rs111033256), T721M (rs121908363)] each with frequency of 1.42%. Three missense variants [S399P (rs747431002), L597S (rs55638457), and G6V (rs111033423)] were reported under the "uncertain" category. All the collected samples were further genotyped to look for the possibility of having GJB2 and HL-associated mutations.

Results

Out of five SLC26A4 pathogenic mutations N246fs (rs918684449) and K564fs (rs746427774) were observed in samples which were positive for GJB2-HL associated candidate mutations [W24X (rs104894396), Q124X (rs397516874) and W77X (rs80338944)]. Similarly, pathogenic variants F122fs, V239D (rs111033256) and T721M (rs121908363) were observed in patient samples which were negative for GJB2-HL associated mutations.

Conclusion

Our data will expand the list of variants underlying NSHL and encourage further genotype SLC26A4 gene concerning the south Indian population with a large sample size.

[Genetics of pediatric hearing loss]

With the rapid development of sequencing technology and bioinformatics, the genetic research and related clinical practice of pediatric hearing loss have also made significant progress. This review summarized and analyzed the genetic causes of hearing impairment in children and the research progress of related genetic diagnosis and screening, in order to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of pediatric hearing loss and related research.

[The critical thoughts on diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss]

With the rapid development of genomics, imaging detection, audiology technology, and gene therapy, the clinical practice of childhood hearing loss has also made significant progress. This paper summarized and analyzed the important concepts, epidemiology, hearing screening, hearing diagnosis, genetic evaluation, imaging detection and intervention strategies of pediatric hearing loss, especially the current situation and new progress, to facilitate the clinical practice of diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss.

The Frequency of Common Deafness-Associated Variants Among 3,555,336 Newborns in China and 141,456 Individuals Across Seven Populations Worldwide

OBJECTIVES

Genetic screening can benefit early detection and intervention for hearing loss. The frequency of common deafness-associated variants in general populations is highly important for genetic screening and genetic counseling tailored to different ethnic backgrounds. We aimed to analyze the frequency of common deafness-associated variants in a large population-based Chinese newborn cohort and to explore the population-specific features in diverse populations worldwide.

DESIGN

This population-based cohort study analyzed the frequency of common deafness-associated variants in 3,555,336 newborns in the Chinese Newborn Concurrent Hearing and Genetic Screening cohort. Participants were newborn infants born between January 2007 and September 2020. Limited genetic screening for 20 variants in 4 common deafness-associated genes and newborn hearing screening were offered concurrently to all newborns in the Chinese Newborn Concurrent Hearing and Genetic Screening cohort. Sequence information of 141,456 individuals was also analyzed from seven ethnic populations from the Genome Aggregation Database for 20 common deafness-related variants. Statistical analysis was performed using R.

RESULTS

A total of 3,555,326 Chinese neonates completed the Newborn Concurrent Hearing and Genetic Screening were included for analysis. We reported the distinct landscape of common deafness-associated variants in this large population-based cohort. We found that the carrier frequencies of GJB2 , SLC26A4 , GJB3 , and MT-RNR were 2.53%, 2.05%, 0.37%, and 0.25%, respectively. Furthermore, GJB2 c.235delC was the most common variant with an allele frequency of 0.99% in the Chinese newborn population. We also demonstrated nine East-Asia-enriched variants, one Ashkenazi Jewish-enriched variant, and one European/American-enriched variant for hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed the distinct landscape of common deafness-associated variants in the Chinese newborn population and provided insights into population-specific features in diverse populations. These data can serve as a powerful resource for otolaryngologists and clinical geneticists to inform population-adjusted genetic screening programs for hearing loss.

Clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Hearing loss is a common and complex condition that can occur at any age, can be inherited or acquired, and is associated with a remarkably wide array of etiologies. The diverse causes of hearing loss, combined with the highly variable and often overlapping presentations of different forms of hearing loss, challenge the ability of traditional clinical evaluations to arrive at an etiologic diagnosis for many deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. However, identifying the etiology of hearing loss may affect clinical management, improve prognostic accuracy, and refine genetic counseling and assessment of the likelihood of recurrence for relatives of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. Linguistic and cultural identities associated with being deaf or hard-of-hearing can complicate access to and the effectiveness of clinical care. These concerns can be minimized when genetic and other health care services are provided in a linguistically and culturally sensitive manner. This clinical practice resource offers information about the frequency, causes, and presentations of hearing loss and suggests approaches to the clinical and genetic evaluation of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals aimed at identifying an etiologic diagnosis and providing informative and effective patient education and genetic counseling.

Association Between Expanded Genomic Sequencing Combined With Hearing Screening and Detection of Hearing Loss Among Newborns in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

IMPORTANCE

Hearing loss is a global social burden. Early identification of hearing loss missed by newborn hearing screening tests in the neonatal intensive care unit is crucial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between expanded genomic sequencing combined with hearing screening and detection of hearing loss as well as improvement in the neonatal intensive care unit.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was performed between August 8, 2016, and December 31, 2020, among 8078 newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the Children's Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Follow-up for hearing status was performed via telephone interviews between September 1 and November 30, 2021.

EXPOSURES

A hearing screening test and the expanded genomic sequencing targeting 2742 genes were administered to each patient. Those who failed the hearing screening test or had positive genetic findings were referred for diagnostic audiometry at a median of 3 months of age.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was hearing loss missed by hearing screening test. Secondary outcomes were genetic findings and benefits associated with the expanded genomic sequencing for clinical management of patients in the neonatal intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Of 8078 patients (4666 boys [57.8%]; median age, 6.3 days [IQR, 3.0-12.0 days]), 52 of 240 (21.7%) received a diagnosis of hearing loss. Expanded genomic sequencing combined with hearing screening was associated with a 15.6% increase (7 of 45 patients) in cases of diagnosed hearing loss that were missed by hearing screening. Of the 52 patients with hearing loss, genetic factors were identified for 39 patients (75.0%); GJB2 and SLC26A4 were the most common genes identified. Patients with genetic findings experienced a more severe degree of hearing loss than those without genetic findings (21 profound, 4 severe, 7 moderate, and 7 mild vs 2 severe, 4 moderate, and 7 mild; P = .005), with more bilateral hearing loss (39 of 39 [100%] vs 9 of 13 [69.2%]; P = .003). Clinical management strategies were changed for patients who underwent genomic sequencing combined with hearing screening.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that expanded genomic sequencing combined with hearing screening may be effective at detecting hearing loss among patients in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Concurrent newborn hearing and genetic screening of common hearing loss variants with bloodspot-based targeted next generation sequencing in Jiangxi province

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Concurrent hearing and genetic screening of newborns have been widely adopted as an effective strategy in early diagnosis and intervention for hearing loss in many cities in China. Here, we aimed to firstly explore the efficacy of combining conventional hearing screening with genetic screening among the large-scale newborns in Jiangxi Province.

METHODS

A total of 24,349 newborns from Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital were enrolled in our study from April 2021 to June 2022. Newborn hearing screening was conducted using otoacoustic emission (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR). Meanwhile, newborn dried blood spots were collected and twenty common variants in four genes, including GJB2, SLC26A4, MT-RNR1(12SrRNA), and GJB3, were screened using a BGISEQ-500 next generation sequencing platform. Whole coding regions sequencing of GJB2 and SLC26A4 were performed by Sanger sequencing and NGS, respectively. Following up of hearing for the newborns was undertaken by phone interviews.

RESULTS

Among the 24,349 newborns, 7.00% (1,704/24,349) were bilaterally or unilaterally referred in their initial hearing screening, whereas 1.30% (316/24,349) exhibited bilateral or unilateral hearing loss in the repeated screening. Genetic screening revealed that 4.813% (1,172/24,349) of the screened newborns were positive for at least one mutant allele (heterozygote, homozygote, or compound heterozygote in one gene, mtDNA homoplasmy or heteroplasmy and combined variants in different genes). A total of 1,146 individuals were identified with mutant allele in one gene, including 525 of GJB2, 371 of SLC26A4, 189 as homoplasmic or heteroplasmic of MT-RNR1, and 61 of GJB3, indicating that GJB2 and SLC26A4 are the most common endemic deafness-associated genes among newborns in Jiangxi Province. Nineteen newborns were detected with combined heterozygous variants in different genes, with "c.235delC heterozygous and c.919-2A > G heterozygous" as the most prevalent genotype. Additionally, seven newborns were screened as homozygotes or compound heterozygotes responsible for congenital or late-onset prelingual hearing loss, including three cases with GJB2 c.235delC homozygous and one with SLC26A4 c.919-2A > G homozygous variant, one case with compound heterozygous variants for GJB2 and two with compound heterozygous variants for SLC26A4. Coding regions sequencing of GJB2 or SLC26A4 for overall 265 infants revealed that 14 individuals were identified as compound heterozygote with a second pathogenic variant not screened by our genetic panel.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein our study firstly investigated the efficacy of concurrent hearing screening and genetic screening of common hearing impairment variants among large-scale newborns in Jiangxi Province. Concurrent screening provides a more comprehensive approach for management of congenital or delayed onset prelingual hearing loss and prevention of drug-induced hearing impairment for newborns at risk as well as their maternal relatives. An insight into the molecular epidemiology for hearing loss genes among Jiangxi population will also be beneficial to the genetic counseling and birth defect prevention.