Association of Positive Fluid Balance at Discharge After Sepsis Management With 30-Day Readmission

Effect of restrictive cumulative fluid balance on 28-day survival in invasively ventilated patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to COVID-19

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two restrictive cumulative fluid balance (CFB) trends on survival and on major clinical outcomes in invasively ventilated patients with moderate to severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS-CoV-2. Prospective data collection was conducted on patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) originating from a tertiary university hospital. The primary outcomes were the risk association between the CFB trend during D0 to D7 and 28-day survival. The secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, the need for invasive ventilation at D28, administration of vasoactive drugs at D7, time on invasive ventilation after D7, and length of ICU and hospital stay. 171 patients were enrolled in the study and divided according to their CFB trends during seven days of follow-up using model-based clustering [median CFB negative trend (n = 89) - 279 ml (- 664 to 203) and (n = 82) median CFB positive trend 1362 ml (619-2026)]. The group with CFB negative trend showed a higher chance of surviving 28-day in the ICU (HR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p = 0.038). Moreover, this group had a reduced length of stay in the ICU, 11 (8-19) days versus 16.5 (9-29) days p = 0.004 and presented lower rates (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.09-0.52) of invasive ventilation after 28-days in the ICU. In patients invasively ventilated with moderate to severe ARDS due to COVID-19, the collective who showed a negative trend in the CFB after seven days of invasive ventilation had a higher chance of surviving 28 days in the ICU and lower length of stay in the ICU.

Impact of a cumulative positive fluid balance during the first three ICU days in patients with sepsis: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for fluid management during the first few days of ICU in sepsis patients remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the impact of cumulative fluid balance during the first three days of ICU on the mortality of patients with sepsis.

METHODS

This study analyzed prospectively collected data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance Database, which registered 11,981 sepsis patients from 20 hospitals. We selected three propensity score-matched cohorts consisting of patients with a negative or positive cumulative fluid balance during the first three ICU days: from ICU admission to the first midnight as the D1 cohort, until the second midnight as the D2 cohort, and until the third midnight as the D3 cohort. The propensity score for fluid balance was calculated using covariates including the amount of fluid output during the first three ICU days. The primary outcome was mortality at day 28 in the ICU.

RESULTS

From a total of 11,981 patients, 2516 patients were included for propensity score matching. After matching in a 1:1 ratio, there were 483, 373, and 392 matched pairs of patients assigned to the D1, D2, and D3 cohorts, respectively. In the D1 cohort, there were no significant differences in mortality at day 28 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.60; P = 0.354) between the two groups. The positive fluid groups in both the D2 (HR, 2.13; 95% CI 1.48-3.06; P < 0.001) and D3 (HR, 1.56; 95% CI 1.10-2.22; P = 0.012) cohorts had significantly higher mortality rates than the negative fluid groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sepsis, a positive fluid balance on the first ICU day was not associated with mortality at day 28. In contrast, cumulative positive fluid balances on the second and third ICU days were associated with higher mortality at day 28.

Association between early cumulative fluid balance and successful liberation from invasive ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS patients - insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study: a national, multicenter, observational cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence indicates the potential benefits of restricted fluid management in critically ill patients. Evidence lacks on the optimal fluid management strategy for invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that the cumulative fluid balance would affect the successful liberation of invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

We analyzed data from the multicenter observational 'PRactice of VENTilation in COVID-19 patients' study. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 and ARDS who required invasive ventilation during the first 3 months of the international outbreak (March 1, 2020, to June 2020) across 22 hospitals in the Netherlands were included. The primary outcome was successful liberation of invasive ventilation, modeled as a function of day 3 cumulative fluid balance using Cox proportional hazards models, using the crude and the adjusted association. Sensitivity analyses without missing data and modeling ARDS severity were performed.

RESULTS

Among 650 patients, three groups were identified. Patients in the higher, intermediate, and lower groups had a median cumulative fluid balance of 1.98 L (1.27-7.72 L), 0.78 L (0.26-1.27 L), and - 0.35 L (- 6.52-0.26 L), respectively. Higher day 3 cumulative fluid balance was significantly associated with a lower probability of successful ventilation liberation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.95, P = 0.0047). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 and ARDS, a higher cumulative fluid balance was associated with a longer ventilation duration, indicating that restricted fluid management in these patients may be beneficial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04346342 ); Date of registration: April 15, 2020.

Early prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin alleviates mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV database

BACKGROUND

Minimal data exist on anticoagulation use and timing and the dose of heparin in patients with sepsis, and whether heparin use improves sepsis survival remains largely unclear. This study was performed to assess whether heparin administration would provide a survival advantage in critically ill patients with sepsis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was conducted. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to evaluate the outcomes of prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin administered by subcutaneous injection within 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 60-day mortality, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) on day 7. E-Value analysis were used for unmeasured confounding.

RESULTS

A total of 6646 adult septic patients were included and divided into an early prophylactic heparin group (n = 3211) and a nonheparin group (n = 3435). In-hospital mortality in the heparin therapy group was significantly lower than that in the nonheparin group (prematched 14.7 vs 20.0%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.68-0.87], p < 0.001, and postmatched 14.9 vs 18.3%, HR 0.78, 95% CI [0.68-0.89], p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints, including 60-day mortality and length of ICU stay, differed between the heparin and nonheparin groups (p < 0.01). Early prophylactic heparin administration was associated with in-hospital mortality among septic patients in different adjusted covariates (HR 0.71-0.78, p < 0.001), and only administration of five doses of heparin was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality after PSM (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that heparin use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy, septic shock, sequential organ failure assessment score ≥ 10, AKI, mechanical ventilation, gram-positive bacterial infection and gram-negative bacterial infection, with HRs of 0.74, 0.70, 0.58, 0.74, 0.73, 0.64 and 0.72, respectively (p <0.001). E-Value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found an association between early administration prophylactic heparin provided to patients with sepsis and reduced risk-adjusted mortality. A prospective randomized-controlled study should be designed to further assess the relevant findings.