1
|
Gleason KT, Powell D, DeGennaro AP, Wu MMJ, Zhang T, Wolff JL. Patient portal messages to support an age-friendly health system for persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:2140-2147. [PMID: 38411982 PMCID: PMC11226382 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient portal secure messaging can support age-friendly dementia care, yet little is known about care partner use of the portal and how message concerns relate to age-friendly issues. METHODS We conducted a two-part observational study. We first assessed the feasibility of automating care partner identification from patient portal messages by developing and testing a natural language processing (NLP) rule-based classification system from portal messages of 1973 unique patients 65 and older. Second, two independent reviewers manually coded a randomly selected sample of portal messages for 987 persons with dementia to identify the frequency of expressed needs from the 4M domains of an Age-Friendly Health System (medications, mentation, mobility, and what matters). RESULTS A total of 267 (13.53%) of 1973 messages sent from older adults' portal accounts were identified through manual coding as sent by a nonpatient author. The NLP model performance to identify nonpatient authors demonstrated an AUC of 0.90. Most messages sent from the accounts of persons with dementia contained content relevant to the 4Ms (60%, 601/987), with the breakdown as follows: medications-36% (357/987), mobility-10% (101/987), mentation-16% (153/987), and what matters (aligning care with specific health goals and care preferences)-21%, 207/987. CONCLUSIONS Patient portal messaging offers an avenue to identify care partners and meet the informational needs of persons with dementia and their care partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danielle Powell
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Mingche MJ Wu
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Talan Zhang
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salmi L, Peereboom D, Dorr DA, Graham LR, Wolff JL, DesRoches CM. Patient Portals Fail to Collect Structured Information About Who Else is Involved in a Person's Care. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e49394. [PMID: 38935963 PMCID: PMC11240061 DOI: 10.2196/49394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The US health care delivery system does not systematically engage or support family or friend care partners. Meanwhile, the uptake and familiarity of portals to personal health information are increasing among patients. Technology innovations, such as shared access to the portal, use separate identity credentials to differentiate between patients and care partners. Although not well-known, or commonly used, shared access allows patients to identify who they do and do not want to be involved in their care. However, the processes for patients to grant shared access to portals are often limited or so onerous that interested patients and care partners often circumvent the process entirely. As a result, the vast majority of care partners resort to accessing portals using a patient's identity credentials-a "do-it-yourself" solution in conflict with a health systems' legal responsibility to protect patient privacy and autonomy. The personal narratives in this viewpoint (shared by permission) elaborate on quantitative studies and provide first-person snapshots of challenges faced by patients and families as they attempt to gain or grant shared access during crucial moments in their lives. As digital modalities increase patient roles in health care interactions, so does the importance of making shared access work for all stakeholders involved-patients, clinicians, and care partners. Electronic health record vendors must recognize that both patients and care partners are important users of their products, and health care organizations must acknowledge and support the critical contributions of care partners as distinct from patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Salmi
- Department of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Danielle Peereboom
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - David A Dorr
- Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Catherine M DesRoches
- Department of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riffin C, Cassidy J, Smith JM, Begler E, Peereboom D, Lum HD, DesRoches CM, Wolff JL. Care Partner Perspectives on the Use of a Patient Portal Intervention to Promote Care Partner Identification in Dementia Care. J Appl Gerontol 2024:7334648241262649. [PMID: 38901834 DOI: 10.1177/07334648241262649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Care partners are crucial to supporting the complex health needs of older adults with dementia, but they are not systematically identified in care delivery. As part of a real-world implementation project in geriatric primary care, we adapted a portal-based agenda setting intervention, OurNotes, by incorporating items to help care partners self-identify. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with care partners (N = 15) who completed the adapted OurNotes to explore their perceptions of the tool (usability, benefits, and challenges) and recommendations for refinement. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Benefits included enhancing care partners' preparedness for the visit and opening a direct channel to express concerns about patients' cognition and memory loss to clinicians. Challenges pertained to clinician responsiveness; recommendations focused on enabling the submitted OurNotes responses to be edited and updated by multiple care partners. Such refinements may help to maximize the impact of adapted OurNotes' and potential for future implementation and dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Riffin
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Cassidy
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jamie M Smith
- Center for Equity in Aging, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erika Begler
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Danielle Peereboom
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hillary D Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Catherine M DesRoches
- Department of Medicine, OpenNotes/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Kessel R, Ranganathan S, Anderson M, McMillan B, Mossialos E. Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2024; 189:105513. [PMID: 38851132 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient engagement when providing patient access to health data results from an interaction between the available tools and individual capabilities. The recent digital advancements of the healthcare field have altered the manifestation and importance of patient engagement. However, a comprehensive assessment of what factors contribute to patient engagement remain absent. In this review article, we synthesised the most frequently discussed factors that can foster patient engagement with their health data. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Relevant data were synthesized within 7 layers using a thematic analysis: (1) social and demographic factors, (2) patient ability factors, (3) patient motivation factors, (4) factors related to healthcare professionals' attitudes and skills, (5) health system factors, (6) technological factors, and (7) policy factors. RESULTS We identified 5801 academic and 200 Gy literature records, and included 292 (4.83%) in this review. Overall, 44 factors that can affect patient engagement with their health data were extracted. We extracted 6 social and demographic factors, 6 patient ability factors, 12 patient motivation factors, 7 factors related to healthcare professionals' attitudes and skills, 4 health system factors, 6 technological factors, and 3 policy factors. CONCLUSIONS Improving patient engagement with their health data enables the development of patient-centered healthcare, though it can also exacerbate existing inequities. While expanding patient access to health data is an important step towards fostering shared decision-making in healthcare and subsequently empowering patients, it is important to ensure that these developments reach all sectors of the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin van Kessel
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom; Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Digital Public Health Task Force, Association of School of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER), Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | - Michael Anderson
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Brian McMillan
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Elias Mossialos
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liang AS, Vedak S, Dussaq A, Yao DH, Morse K, Ip W, Pageler NM. Using a Large Language Model to Identify Adolescent Patient Portal Account Access by Guardians. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2418454. [PMID: 38916895 PMCID: PMC11200138 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
This diagnostic/prognostic study assesses the ability of a large language model (LLM) to detect guardian authorship of messages originating from adolescent patient portals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April S. Liang
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Shivam Vedak
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Alex Dussaq
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Dong-Han Yao
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Keith Morse
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Wui Ip
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Natalie M. Pageler
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wolff JL, Wec A, Peereboom D, Gleason KT, Amjad H, Burgdorf JG, Cassidy J, DesRoches CM, Fabius CD, Green AR, Lin CT, Nothelle SK, Powell DS, Riffin CA, Smith J, Lum HD. Care partners and consumer health information technology: A framework to guide systems-level initiatives in support of digital health equity. Learn Health Syst 2024; 8:e10408. [PMID: 38883870 PMCID: PMC11176584 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Consumer-oriented health information technologies (CHIT) such as the patient portal have a growing role in care delivery redesign initiatives such as the Learning Health System. Care partners commonly navigate CHIT demands alongside persons with complex health and social needs, but their role is not well specified. Methods We assemble evidence and concepts from the literature describing interpersonal communication, relational coordination theory, and systems-thinking to develop an integrative framework describing the care partner's role in applied CHIT innovations. Our framework describes pathways through which systematic engagement of the care partner affects longitudinal work processes and multi-level outcomes relevant to Learning Health Systems. Results Our framework is grounded in relational coordination, an emerging theory for understanding the dynamics of coordinating work that emphasizes role-based relationships and communication, and the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model. Cross-cutting work systems geared toward explicit and purposeful support of the care partner role through CHIT may advance work processes by promoting frequent, timely, accurate, problem-solving communication, reinforced by shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect between patients, care partners, and care team. We further contend that systematic engagement of the care partner in longitudinal work processes exerts beneficial effects on care delivery experiences and efficiencies at both individual and organizational levels. We discuss the utility of our framework through the lens of an illustrative case study involving patient portal-mediated pre-visit agenda setting. Conclusions Our framework can be used to guide applied embedded CHIT interventions that support the care partner role and bring value to Learning Health Systems through advancing digital health equity, improving user experiences, and driving efficiencies through improved coordination within complex work systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Aleksandra Wec
- Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Danielle Peereboom
- Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Kelly T Gleason
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Halima Amjad
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Julia G Burgdorf
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research Visiting Nurse Service of New York New York New York USA
| | - Jessica Cassidy
- School of Social Work University of Texas at Arlington Arlington Texas USA
| | | | - Chanee D Fabius
- Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - C T Lin
- University of Colorado Aurora Colorado USA
| | - Stephanie K Nothelle
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Danielle S Powell
- Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA
| | - Catherine A Riffin
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Weill Cornell Medical Center New York New York USA
| | - Jamie Smith
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Hillary D Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee P, Tun S, Gleason L. What matters most: Finding balance after falling. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:1306-1309. [PMID: 38456560 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
See related editorial by Powers and Sehgal in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Lee
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sandy Tun
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lauren Gleason
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Powell DS, Wu MMJ, Nothelle S, Gleason K, Oh E, Lum HD, Reed NS, Wolff JL. The Annual Wellness Visit Health Risk Assessment: Potential of Patient Portal-Based Completion and Patient-Oriented Education and Support. Innov Aging 2024; 8:igae023. [PMID: 38618518 PMCID: PMC11010311 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Patient portals are secure online platforms that allow patients to perform electronic health management tasks and engage in bidirectional information exchange with their care team. Some health systems administer Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) health risk assessments through the patient portal. Scalable opportunities from portal-based administration of risk assessments are not well understood. Our objective is 2-fold-to understand who receives vs misses an AWV and health risk assessment and explore who might be missed with portal-based administration. Research Design and Methods This is an observational study of electronic medical record and patient portal data (10/03/2021-10/02/2022) for 12 756 primary care patients 66+ years from a large academic health system. Results Two-thirds (n = 8420) of older primary care patients incurred an AWV; 81.0% of whom were active portal users. Older adults who were active portal users were more likely to incur AWV than those who were not, though portal use was high in both groups (81.0% with AWV vs 76.8% without; p < .001). Frequently affirmative health risk assessment categories included falls/balance concerns (44.2%), lack of a documented advanced directive (42.3%), sedentary behaviors (39.9%), and incontinence (35.1%). Mean number of portal messages over the 12-month observation period varied from 7.2 among older adults affirmative responses to concerns about safety at home to 13.8 for older adults who reported difficulty completing activities of daily living. Portal messaging varied more than 2-fold across affirmative health risk categories and were marginally higher with greater number affirmative (mean = 13.8 messages/year no risks; 19.6 messages/year 10+ risks). Discussion and Implications Most older adults were active portal users-a group more likely to have incurred a billed AWV. Efforts to integrate AWV risk assessments in the patient portal may streamline administration and scalability for dissemination of tailored electronically mediated preventive care but must attend to equity issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle S Powell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Mingche M J Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie Nothelle
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly Gleason
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Esther Oh
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hillary D Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Nicholas S Reed
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dukhanin V, McDonald KM, Gonzalez N, Gleason KT. Patient Reasoning: Patients' and Care Partners' Perceptions of Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:102-111. [PMID: 37965762 PMCID: PMC10712203 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231207829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the context of validating a measure of patient report specific to diagnostic accuracy in emergency department or urgent care, this study investigates patients' and care partners' perceptions of diagnoses as accurate and explores variations in how they reason while they assess accuracy. METHODS In February 2022, we surveyed a national panel of adults who had an emergency department or urgent care visit in the past month to test a patient-reported measure. As part of the survey validation, we asked for free-text responses about why the respondents indicated their (dis)agreement with 2 statements comprising patient-reported diagnostic accuracy: 1) the explanation they received of the health problem was true and 2) the explanation described what to expect of the health problem. Those paired free-text responses were qualitatively analyzed according to themes created inductively. RESULTS A total of 1,116 patients and care partners provided 982 responses coded into 10 themes, which were further grouped into 3 reasoning types. Almost one-third (32%) of respondents used only corroborative reasoning in assessing the accuracy of the health problem explanation (alignment of the explanation with either test results, patients' subsequent health trajectory, their medical knowledge, symptoms, or another doctor's opinion), 26% used only perception-based reasoning (perceptions of diagnostic process, uncertainty around the explanation received, or clinical team's attitudes), and 27% used both types of reasoning. The remaining 15% used general beliefs or nonexplicated logic (used only about accurate diagnoses) and combinations of general reasoning with perception-based and corroborative. CONCLUSIONS Patients and care partners used multifaceted reasoning in their assessment of diagnostic accuracy. IMPLICATIONS As health care shifts toward meaningful diagnostic co-production and shared decision making, in-depth understanding of variations in patient reasoning and mental models informs use in clinical practice. HIGHLIGHTS An analysis of 982 responses examined how patients and care partners reason about the accuracy of diagnoses they received in emergency or urgent care.In reasoning, people used their perception of the process and whether the diagnosis matched other factual information they have.We introduce "patient reasoning" in the diagnostic measurement context as an area of further research to inform diagnostic shared decision making and co-production of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Dukhanin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kathryn M. McDonald
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gleason KT, Wu MMJ, Wec A, Powell DS, Zhang T, Gamper MJ, Green AR, Nothelle S, Amjad H, Wolff JL. Use of the patient portal among older adults with diagnosed dementia and their care partners. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:5663-5671. [PMID: 37354066 PMCID: PMC10808947 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Care partners are at the forefront of dementia care, yet little is known about patient portal use in the context of dementia diagnosis. METHODS We conducted an observational cohort study of date/time-stamped patient portal use for a 5-year period (October 3, 2017-October 2, 2022) at an academic health system. The cohort consisted of 3170 patients ages 65+ with diagnosed dementia with 2+ visits within 24 months. Message authorship was determined by manual review of 970 threads involving 3065 messages for 279 patients. RESULTS Most (71.20%) older adults with diagnosed dementia were registered portal users but far fewer (10.41%) had a registered care partner with shared access. Care partners authored most (612/970, 63.09%) message threads, overwhelmingly using patient identity credentials (271/279, 97.13%). DISCUSSION The patient portal is used by persons with dementia and their care partners. Organizational efforts that facilitate shared access may benefit the support of persons with dementia and their care partners. Highlights Patient portal registration and use has been increasing among persons with diagnosed dementia. Two thirds of secure messages from portal accounts of patients with diagnosed dementia were identified as being authored by care partners, primarily using patient login credentials. Care partners who accessed the patient portal using their own identity credentials through shared access demonstrate similar levels of activity to patients without dementia. Organizational initiatives should recognize and support the needs of persons with dementia and their care partners by encouraging awareness, registration, and use of proper identity credentials, including shared, or proxy, portal access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly T. Gleason
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mingche M. J. Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Aleksandra Wec
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Danielle S. Powell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Talan Zhang
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary Jo Gamper
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ariel R. Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie Nothelle
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Halima Amjad
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dukhanin V, Wolff JL, Salmi L, Harcourt K, Wachenheim D, Byock I, Gonzales MJ, Niehus D, Parshley M, Reay C, Epstein S, Mohile S, Farrell TW, Supiano MA, Jajodia A, DesRoches CM. Co-Designing an Initiative to Increase Shared Access to Older Adults' Patient Portals: Stakeholder Engagement. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e46146. [PMID: 37991827 PMCID: PMC10701652 DOI: 10.2196/46146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The patient portal is a widely available secure digital platform offered by care delivery organizations that enables patients to communicate electronically with clinicians and manage their care. Many organizations allow patients to authorize family members or friends-"care partners"-to share access to patient portal accounts, thus enabling care partners to receive their own identity credentials. Shared access facilitates trilateral information exchange among patients, clinicians, and care partners; however, uptake and awareness of this functionality are limited. OBJECTIVE We partnered with 3 health care organizations to co-design an initiative that aimed to increase shared access registration and use and that can be implemented using existing patient portals. METHODS In 2020, we undertook a rigorous selection process to identify 3 geographically diverse health care organizations that had engaged medical informatics teams and clinical champions within service delivery lines caring for older adults. We prioritized selecting organizations that serve racially and socioeconomically diverse populations and possess sophisticated reporting capabilities, a stable patient portal platform, a sufficient volume of older adult patients, and active patient and family advisory councils. Along with patients and care partners, clinicians, staff, and other stakeholders, the study team co-designed an initiative to increase the uptake of shared access guided by either an iterative, human-centered design process or rapid assessment procedures of stakeholders' inputs. RESULTS Between February 2020 and April 2022, 73 stakeholder engagements were conducted with patients and care partners, clinicians and clinic staff, medical informatics teams, marketing and communications staff, and administrators, as well as with funders and thought leaders. We collected insights regarding (1) barriers to awareness, registration, and use of shared access; (2) features of consumer-facing educational materials to address identified barriers; (3) features of clinician- and staff-facing materials to address identified barriers; and (4) approaches to fit the initiative into current workflows. Using these inputs iteratively via a human-centered design process, we produced brochures and posters, co-designed organization-specific web pages detailing shared access registration processes, and developed clinician and staff talking points about shared access and staff tip sheets that outline shared access registration steps. Educational materials emphasized the slogan "People remember less than half of what their doctors say," which was selected from 9 candidate alternatives as resonating best with the full range of the initiative's stakeholders. The materials were accompanied by implementation toolkits specifying and reinforcing workflows involving both in-person and telehealth visits. CONCLUSIONS Meaningful and authentic stakeholder engagement allowed our deliberate, iterative, and human-centered co-design aimed at increasing the use of shared access. Our initiative has been launched as a part of a 12-month demonstration that will include quantitative and qualitative analysis of registration and use of shared access. Educational materials are publicly available at Coalition for Care Partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Dukhanin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Liz Salmi
- OpenNotes, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kendall Harcourt
- OpenNotes, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Deborah Wachenheim
- OpenNotes, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ira Byock
- The Institute for Human Caring at Providence, Gardena, CA, United States
| | - Matthew J Gonzales
- The Institute for Human Caring at Providence, Gardena, CA, United States
| | - Doug Niehus
- Providence Medical Group, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Caroline Reay
- Providence Medical Group, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Sara Epstein
- The Institute for Human Caring at Providence, Gardena, CA, United States
| | - Supriya Mohile
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Timothy W Farrell
- Division of Geriatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine and the Center on Aging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Salt Lake City Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Mark A Supiano
- Division of Geriatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine and the Center on Aging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Anushka Jajodia
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Catherine M DesRoches
- OpenNotes, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Longacre ML, Chwistek M, Keleher C, Siemon M, Egleston BL, Collins M, Fang CY. Patient-Caregiver Portal System in Palliative Oncology: Assessment of Usability and Perceived Benefit. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e47624. [PMID: 37917129 PMCID: PMC10654898 DOI: 10.2196/47624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The engagement of family caregivers in oncology is not universal or systematic. OBJECTIVE We implemented a process intervention (ie, patient-caregiver portal system) with an existing patient portal system to (1) allow a patient to specify their caregiver and communication preferences with that caregiver, (2) connect the caregiver to a unique caregiver-specific portal page to indicate their needs, and (3) provide an electronic notification of the dyad's responses to the care team to inform clinicians and connect the caregiver to resources as needed. METHODS We assessed usability and satisfaction with this patient-caregiver portal system among patients with cancer receiving palliative care, their caregivers, and clinicians. RESULTS Of 31 consented patient-caregiver dyads, 20 patients and 19 caregivers logged in. Further, 60% (n=12) of patients indicated a preference to communicate equally or together with their caregiver. Caregivers reported high emotional (n=9, 47.3%), financial (n=6, 31.6%), and physical (n=6, 31.6%) caregiving-related strain. The care team received all patient-caregiver responses electronically. Most patients (86.6%, 13/15 who completed the user experience interview) and caregivers (94%, 16/17 who completed the user experience interview) were satisfied with the system, while, of the 6 participating clinicians, 66.7% agreed "quite a bit" (n=1, 16.7%) or "very much" (n=3, 50%) that the system allowed them to provide better care. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate system usability, including a systematic way to identify caregiver needs and share with the care team in a way that is acceptable to patients and caregivers and perceived by clinicians to benefit clinical care. Integration of a patient-caregiver portal system may be an effective approach for systematically engaging caregivers. These findings highlight the need for additional research among caregivers of patients with less advanced cancer or with different illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcin Chwistek
- Supportive Oncology and Palliative Care Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Cynthia Keleher
- Web Technologies Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mark Siemon
- Web Technologies Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Brian L Egleston
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Molly Collins
- Supportive Oncology and Palliative Care Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Carolyn Y Fang
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gleason KT, Powell DS, Wec A, Zou X, Gamper MJ, Peereboom D, Wolff JL. Patient portal interventions: a scoping review of functionality, automation used, and therapeutic elements of patient portal interventions. JAMIA Open 2023; 6:ooad077. [PMID: 37663406 PMCID: PMC10469545 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives We sought to understand the objectives, targeted populations, therapeutic elements, and delivery characteristics of patient portal interventions. Materials and Methods Following Arksey and O-Malley's methodological framework, we conducted a scoping review of manuscripts published through June 2022 by hand and systematically searching PubMed, PSYCHInfo, Embase, and Web of Science. The search yielded 5403 manuscripts; 248 were selected for full-text review; 81 met the eligibility criteria for examining outcomes of a patient portal intervention. Results The 81 articles described: trials involving comparison groups (n = 37; 45.7%), quality improvement initiatives (n = 15; 18.5%), pilot studies (n = 7; 8.6%), and single-arm studies (n = 22; 27.2%). Studies were conducted in primary care (n = 33, 40.7%), specialty outpatient (n = 24, 29.6%), or inpatient settings (n = 4, 4.9%)-or they were deployed system wide (n = 9, 11.1%). Interventions targeted specific health conditions (n = 35, 43.2%), promoted preventive services (n = 19, 23.5%), or addressed communication (n = 19, 23.4%); few specifically sought to improve the patient experience (n = 3, 3.7%). About half of the studies (n = 40, 49.4%) relied on human involvement, and about half involved personalized (vs exclusively standardized) elements (n = 42, 51.8%). Interventions commonly collected patient-reported information (n = 36, 44.4%), provided education (n = 35, 43.2%), or deployed preventive service reminders (n = 14, 17.3%). Discussion This scoping review finds that most patient portal interventions have delivered education or facilitated collection of patient-reported information. Few interventions have involved pragmatic designs or been deployed system wide. Conclusion The patient portal is an important tool in real-world efforts to more effectively support patients, but interventions to date rely largely on evidence from consented participants rather than pragmatically implemented systems-level initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly T Gleason
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States
| | - Danielle S Powell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Aleksandra Wec
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Xingyuan Zou
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Mary Jo Gamper
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States
| | - Danielle Peereboom
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
You JGT, Potter JE, Mishuris RG. Electronic Health Record Adolescent Confidentiality in a Safety Net Setting. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:878-882. [PMID: 37640057 PMCID: PMC10620039 DOI: 10.1055/a-2161-0800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 21st Century Cures Act provides improved access to one's medical record but presents new challenges to adolescent confidentiality in the domain of health care information technology. Adolescent patients, who have the right to confidential care in certain areas as dictated by state law, face the prospect of parents and guardians erroneously accessing their confidential health information. OBJECTIVES Our institution, the largest safety net hospital in our region, sought to quantify the proportion of adolescent patient portal accounts likely being accessed by guardians and to implement corrective measures for the patient portal sign-up process in our electronic health record (EHR) system. METHODS We manually reviewed our institution's adolescent patient portal accounts based on email addresses associated with adolescents' accounts. We implemented EHR changes to address the potential for breach of confidentiality as a result of adolescent patient portal account creation by guardians. One intervention was creating a "guardrail rule" to prevent guardians from creating adolescent patient portal accounts with their own email addresses. After email reminders to adolescent patients to update their accounts, we deactivated accounts with concern for erroneous guardian access. RESULTS Sixty percent of our institution's adolescent patient portal accounts had possible direct access by guardians. Following requests to update account access, 425 (18.8%) of accounts had email addresses updated by adolescent patients and 1,830 (81.2%) accounts were deactivated. CONCLUSION More nuanced EHR functionality for adolescent patients and their guardians can help health care systems provide confidential, patient-centered care for adolescents, while allowing guardians to access appropriate health information to facilitate care. There is an opportunity for a national consensus on how adolescents and their guardians can access health information by patient portal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Guan-Ting You
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Julia Esther Potter
- Department of Pediatrics, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Rebecca Grochow Mishuris
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Digital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meier-Diedrich E, Davidge G, Hägglund M, Kharko A, Lyckblad C, McMillan B, Blease C, Schwarz J. Changes in Documentation Due to Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Scoping Review. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e46722. [PMID: 37639298 PMCID: PMC10495856 DOI: 10.2196/46722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) are increasingly being implemented. Despite reported benefits to patients, the innovation has prompted concerns among health care professionals (HCPs), including the possibility that access incurs a "dumbing down" of clinical records. Currently, no review has investigated empirical evidence of whether and how documentation changes after introducing PAEHRs. OBJECTIVE This paper presents the protocol for a scoping review examining potential subjective and objective changes in HCPs documentation after using PAEHRs. METHODS This scoping review will be carried out based on the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Several databases will be used to conduct a literature search (APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science Core Collection). Authors will participate in screening identified papers to explore the research questions: How do PAEHRs affect HCPs' documentation practices? and What subjective and objective changes to the clinical notes arise after patient access? Only studies that relate to actual use experiences, and not merely prior expectations about PAEHRs, will be selected in the review. Data abstraction will include but will not be limited to publication type, publication year, country, sample characteristics, setting, study aim, research question, and conclusions. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of the studies included. RESULTS The results from this scoping review will be presented as a narrative synthesis structured along the key themes of the corpus of evidence. Additional data will be prepared in charts or tabular format. We anticipate the results to be presented in a scoping review at a later date. They will be disseminated at scientific conferences and through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS This is the first scoping review that considers potential change in documentation after implementation of PAEHRs. The results can potentially help affirm or refute prior opinions and expectations among various stakeholders about the use of PAEHRs and thereby help to address uncertainties. Results may help to provide guidance to clinicians in writing notes and thus have immediate practical relevance to care. In addition, the review will help to identify any substantive research gaps in this field of research. In the longer term, our findings may contribute to the development of shared documentation guidelines, which in turn are central to improving patient communication and safety. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/46722.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Meier-Diedrich
- Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty for Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Gail Davidge
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Hägglund
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Kharko
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Camilla Lyckblad
- Department of Archives, Libraries, and Museums, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Brian McMillan
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Blease
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Julian Schwarz
- Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Faculty for Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reynolds TL, Cobb JG, Steitz BD, Ancker JS, Rosenbloom ST. The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:654-669. [PMID: 37611795 PMCID: PMC10446914 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Recent external factors-the 21st Century Cures Act and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-have stimulated major changes in the patient portal landscape. The objective of this state-of-the-art review is to describe recent developments in the patient portal literature and to identify recommendations and future directions for the design, implementation, and evaluation of portals. METHODS To focus this review on salient contemporary issues, we elected to center it on four topics: (1) 21st Century Cures Act's impact on patient portals (e.g., Open Notes); (2) COVID-19's pandemic impact on portals; (3) proxy access to portals; and (4) disparities in portal adoption and use. We conducted targeted PubMed searches to identify recent empirical studies addressing these topics, used a two-part screening process to determine relevance, and conducted thematic analyses. RESULTS Our search identified 174 unique papers, 74 were relevant empirical studies and included in this review. Among these papers, we identified 10 themes within our four a priori topics, including preparing for and understanding the consequences of increased patient access to their electronic health information (Cures Act); developing, deploying, and evaluating new virtual care processes (COVID-19); understanding current barriers to formal proxy use (proxy access); and addressing disparities in portal adoption and use (disparities). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the recent trends toward understanding the implications of immediate access to most test results, exploring ways to close gaps in portal adoption and use among different sub-populations, and finding ways to leverage portals to improve health and health care are the next steps in the maturation of patient portals and are key areas that require more research. It is important that health care organizations share their innovative portal efforts, so that successful measures can be tested in other contexts, and progress can continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tera L. Reynolds
- Department of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Jared Guthrie Cobb
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Bryan D. Steitz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Jessica S. Ancker
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - S. Trent Rosenbloom
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gleason KT, Wu MMJ, Wec A, Powell DS, Zhang T, Wolff JL. Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults With Dementia Diagnosis. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:881-883. [PMID: 37358848 PMCID: PMC10294010 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
This cohort study assesses the level of engagement with an electronic health management system among patients with recently diagnosed dementia and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mingche M. J. Wu
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Aleksandra Wec
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Talan Zhang
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer L. Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wolff JL, DesRoches CM, Amjad H, Burgdorf JG, Caffrey M, Fabius CD, Gleason KT, Green AR, Lin CT, Nothelle SK, Peereboom D, Powell DS, Riffin CA, Lum HD. Catalyzing dementia care through the learning health system and consumer health information technology. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:2197-2207. [PMID: 36648146 PMCID: PMC10182243 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
To advance care for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), real-world health system effectiveness research must actively engage those affected to understand what works, for whom, in what setting, and for how long-an agenda central to learning health system (LHS) principles. This perspective discusses how emerging payment models, quality improvement initiatives, and population health strategies present opportunities to embed best practice principles of ADRD care within the LHS. We discuss how stakeholder engagement in an ADRD LHS when embedding, adapting, and refining prototypes can ensure that products are viable when implemented. Finally, we highlight the promise of consumer-oriented health information technologies in supporting persons living with ADRD and their care partners and delivering embedded ADRD interventions at scale. We aim to stimulate progress toward sustainable infrastructure paired with person- and family-facing innovations that catalyze broader transformation of ADRD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine M DesRoches
- OpenNotes/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Halima Amjad
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Julia G Burgdorf
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melanie Caffrey
- Springer Science+Business Media LLC, Oracle Magazine, Computer Technology and Applications Program, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chanee D Fabius
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly T Gleason
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Stephanie K Nothelle
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Danielle Peereboom
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Danielle S Powell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine A Riffin
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hillary D Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|