1
|
Beeche C, Yu T, Wang J, Wilson D, Chen P, Duman E, Pu J. A generalized health index: automated thoracic CT-derived biomarkers predict life expectancy. Br J Radiol 2025; 98:412-421. [PMID: 39535867 PMCID: PMC11840163 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify image biomarkers associated with overall life expectancy from low-dose CT and integrate them as an index for assessing an individual's health. METHODS Two categories of CT image features, body composition tissues and cardiopulmonary vasculature characteristics, were quantified from LDCT scans in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study cohort (n = 3635). Cox proportional-hazards models identified significant image features which were integrated with subject demographics to predict the subject's overall hazard. Subjects were stratified using composite model predictions and feature-specific risk stratification thresholds. The model's performance was validated extensively, including 5-fold cross-validation on PLuSS baseline, PLuSS follow-up examinations, and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). RESULTS The composite model had significantly improved prognostic ability compared to the baseline model (P < .01) with AUCs of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.757-0.792) on PLuSS, 0.723 (95% CI: 0.703-0.744) on PLuSS follow-up, and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.651-0.710) on the NLST cohort. The identified high-risk stratum were several times more likely to die, with mortality rates of 79.34% on PLuSS, 76.47% on PLuSS follow-up, and 46.74% on NLST. Two cardiopulmonary structures (intrapulmonary artery-vein ratio, intrapulmonary vein density) and two body composition tissues (SM density, bone density) identified high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Body composition and pulmonary vasculatures are predictive of an individual's health risk; their integrations with subject demographics facilitate the assessment of an individual's overall health status or susceptibility to disease. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE CT-computed body composition and vasculature biomarkers provide improved prognostic value. The integration of CT biomarkers and patient demographic information improves subject risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Beeche
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Tong Yu
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - David Wilson
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Pengyu Chen
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Emrah Duman
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - Jiantao Pu
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haue AD, Hjaltelin JX, Holm PC, Placido D, Brunak SR. Artificial intelligence-aided data mining of medical records for cancer detection and screening. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e694-e703. [PMID: 39637906 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
The application of artificial intelligence methods to electronic patient records paves the way for large-scale analysis of multimodal data. Such population-wide data describing deep phenotypes composed of thousands of features are now being leveraged to create data-driven algorithms, which in turn has led to improved methods for early cancer detection and screening. Remaining challenges include establishment of infrastructures for prospective testing of such methods, ways to assess biases given the data, and gathering of sufficiently large and diverse datasets that reflect disease heterogeneities across populations. This Review provides an overview of artificial intelligence methods designed to detect cancer early, including key aspects of concern (eg, the problem of data drift-when the underlying health-care data change over time), ethical aspects, and discrepancies between access to cancer screening in high-income countries versus low-income and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie Dahl Haue
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jessica Xin Hjaltelin
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Christoffer Holm
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Davide Placido
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S Ren Brunak
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wulaningsih W, Villamaria C, Akram A, Benemile J, Croce F, Watkins J. Deep Learning Models for Predicting Malignancy Risk in CT-Detected Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lung 2024; 202:625-636. [PMID: 38782779 PMCID: PMC11427562 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-024-00706-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been growing interest in using artificial intelligence/deep learning (DL) to help diagnose prevalent diseases earlier. In this study we sought to survey the landscape of externally validated DL-based computer-aided diagnostic (CADx) models, and assess their diagnostic performance for predicting the risk of malignancy in computed tomography (CT)-detected pulmonary nodules. METHODS An electronic search was performed in four databases (from inception to 10 August 2023). Studies were eligible if they were peer-reviewed experimental or observational articles comparing the diagnostic performance of externally validated DL-based CADx models with models widely used in clinical practice to predict the risk of malignancy. A bivariate random-effect approach for the meta-analysis on the included studies was used. RESULTS Seventeen studies were included, comprising 8553 participants and 9884 nodules. Pooled analyses showed DL-based CADx models were 11.6% more sensitive than physician judgement alone, and 14.5% more than clinical risk models alone. They had a similar pooled specificity to physician judgement alone [0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84) v 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.88)], and were 7.4% more specific than clinical risk models alone. They had superior pooled areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC), with relative pooled AUCs of 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.07) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.07-1.13) versus physician judgement and clinical risk models alone, respectively. CONCLUSION DL-based models are already used in clinical practice in certain settings for nodule management. Our results show their diagnostic performance potentially justifies wider, more routine deployment alongside experienced physician readers to help inform multidisciplinary team decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wahyu Wulaningsih
- The Royal Marsden, London, UK.
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Godwin RC, Tridandapani S. Beyond the AJR: Applying Screening Algorithms (Artificially) Intelligently. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2329663. [PMID: 37315013 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Godwin
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N455E, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Srini Tridandapani
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N455E, Birmingham, AL 35249
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lam S, Bai C, Baldwin DR, Chen Y, Connolly C, de Koning H, Heuvelmans MA, Hu P, Kazerooni EA, Lancaster HL, Langs G, McWilliams A, Osarogiagbon RU, Oudkerk M, Peters M, Robbins HA, Sahar L, Smith RA, Triphuridet N, Field J. Current and Future Perspectives on Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Roadmap From 2023 to 2027 From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19:36-51. [PMID: 37487906 PMCID: PMC11253723 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer substantially reduces mortality from lung cancer, as revealed in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. This review is based on the ninth CT screening symposium of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, which focuses on the major themes pertinent to the successful global implementation of LDCT screening and develops a strategy to further the implementation of lung cancer screening globally. These recommendations provide a 5-year roadmap to advance the implementation of LDCT screening globally, including the following: (1) establish universal screening program quality indicators; (2) establish evidence-based criteria to identify individuals who have never smoked but are at high-risk of developing lung cancer; (3) develop recommendations for incidentally detected lung nodule tracking and management protocols to complement programmatic lung cancer screening; (4) Integrate artificial intelligence and biomarkers to increase the prediction of malignancy in suspicious CT screen-detected lesions; and (5) standardize high-quality performance artificial intelligence protocols that lead to substantial reductions in costs, resource utilization and radiologist reporting time; (6) personalize CT screening intervals on the basis of an individual's lung cancer risk; (7) develop evidence to support clinical management and cost-effectiveness of other identified abnormalities on a lung cancer screening CT; (8) develop publicly accessible, easy-to-use geospatial tools to plan and monitor equitable access to screening services; and (9) establish a global shared education resource for lung cancer screening CT to ensure high-quality reading and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Lam
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Chunxue Bai
- Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute and Chinese Alliance Against Cancer, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - David R Baldwin
- Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Services (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yan Chen
- Digital Screening, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Casey Connolly
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, Colorado
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ping Hu
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ella A Kazerooni
- Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Harriet L Lancaster
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Georg Langs
- Computational Imaging Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annette McWilliams
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Australia University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | | | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging and The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew Peters
- Woolcock Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hilary A Robbins
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Liora Sahar
- Data Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - John Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|