Seizure Prophylaxis After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Seizure Assessment and Forecasting With Efficient Rapid-EEG: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparative Effectiveness Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Approximately 30% of critically ill patients have seizures, and more than half of these seizures do not have an overt clinical correlate. EEG is needed to avoid missing seizures and prevent overtreatment with antiseizure medications. Conventional-EEG (cEEG) resources are logistically constrained and unable to meet their growing demand for seizure detection even in highly developed centers. Brief EEG screening with the validated 2HELPS2B algorithm was proposed as a method to triage cEEG resources, but it is hampered by cEEG requirements, primarily EEG technologists. Seizure risk-stratification using reduced time-to-application rapid response-EEG (rrEEG) systems (∼5 minutes) could be a solution. We assessed the noninferiority of the 2HELPS2B score on a 1-hour rrEEG compared to cEEG.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective EEG diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from October 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. Chart and EEG review performed with consecutive sampling at 4 tertiary care centers, included records of patients ≥18 years old, from January 1, 2018, to June 20, 2022. Monte Carlo simulation power analysis yielded n = 500 rrEEG; for secondary outcomes n = 500 cEEG and propensity-score covariate matching was planned. Primary outcome, noninferiority of rrEEG for seizure risk prediction, was assessed per area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Noninferiority margin (0.05) was based on the 2HELPS2B validation study.

RESULTS

A total of 240 rrEEG with follow-on cEEG were obtained. Median age was 64 (interquartile range 22); 42% were female. 2HELPS2B on a 1-hour rrEEG met noninferiority to cEEG (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.90, p = 0.001). Secondary endpoints of comparison with a matched contemporaneous cEEG showed no significant difference in AUC (0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.94, p = 0.31); in false negative rate for the 2HELPS2B = 0 group (p = 1.0) rrEEG (0.021, 95% CI 0-0.062), cEEG (0.016, 95% CI 0-0.048); nor in survival analyses.

DISCUSSION

2HELPS2B on 1-hour rrEEG is noninferior to cEEG for seizure prediction. Patients with low-risk (2HELPS2B = 0) may be able to forgo prolonged cEEG, allowing for increased monitoring of at-risk patients.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that rrEEG is noninferior to cEEG in calculating the 2HELPS2B score to predict seizure risk.

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Prevention of Poststroke Epilepsy: Clinical and Research Implications

Poststroke epilepsy (PSE) is associated with higher mortality and poor functional and cognitive outcomes in patients with stroke. With the remarkable development of acute stroke treatment, there is a growing number of survivors with PSE. Although approximately 10% of patients with stroke develop PSE, given the significant burden of stroke worldwide, PSE is a significant problem in stroke survivors. Therefore, the attention of health policymakers and significant funding are required to promote PSE prevention research. The current PSE definition includes unprovoked seizures occurring more than 7 days after stroke onset, given the high recurrence risks of seizures. However, the pathologic cascade of stroke is not uniform, indicating the need for a tissue-based approach rather than a time-based one to distinguish early seizures from late seizures. EEG is a commonly used tool in the diagnostic work-up of PSE. EEG findings during the acute phase of stroke can potentially stratify the risk of subsequent seizures and predict the development of poststroke epileptogenesis. Recent reports suggest that cortical superficial siderosis, which may be involved in epileptogenesis, is a promising marker for PSE. By incorporating such markers, future risk-scoring models could guide treatment strategies, particularly for the primary prophylaxis of PSE. To date, drugs that prevent poststroke epileptogenesis are lacking. The primary challenge involves the substantial cost burden due to the difficulty of reliably enrolling patients who develop PSE. There is, therefore, a critical need to determine reliable biomarkers for PSE. The goal is to be able to use them for trial enrichment and as a surrogate outcome measure for epileptogenesis. Moreover, seizure prophylaxis is essential to prevent functional and cognitive decline in stroke survivors. Further elucidation of factors that contribute to poststroke epileptogenesis is eagerly awaited. Meanwhile, the regimen of antiseizure medications should be based on individual cardiovascular risk, psychosomatic comorbidities, and concomitant medications. This review summarizes the current understanding of poststroke epileptogenesis, its risks, prognostic models, prophylaxis, and strategies for secondary prevention of seizures and suggests strategies to advance research on PSE.

Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Adults Hospitalized with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society

BACKGROUND

There is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles assessing ASM prophylaxis in adults with moderate-severe TBI (acute radiographic findings and requiring hospitalization). The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) questions were as follows: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with moderate-severe TBI and no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? (3) If an ASM is used, should a long versus short (> 7 vs. ≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes were early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, mortality, and functional outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to generate recommendations.

RESULTS

The initial literature search yielded 1998 articles, of which 33 formed the basis of the recommendations: PICO 1: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of ASM compared to no ASM on the outcomes of early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, or mortality. PICO 2: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or mortality, though point estimates suggest fewer late seizures and fewer adverse events with LEV. PICO 3: There were no significant differences in early or late seizures with longer versus shorter ASM use, though cognitive outcomes and adverse events appear worse with protracted use.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on GRADE criteria, we suggest that ASM or no ASM may be used in patients hospitalized with moderate-severe TBI (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days, weak recommendation, low quality of evidence).

Predictors of unprovoked seizures in intracerebral hemorrhages

BACKGROUND

Seizures are a common complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to identify predictors of unprovoked seizures (US) after ICH in a Chinese cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with ICH admitted in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University between November 2018 and December 2020. Incidence and risk factors of US were identified with univariate and then multiple Cox regression analysis. We used χ2 test to compare incidence of US between groups with or without prophylactic anti-seizure medications (ASM) in patients with craniotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 488 patients were included in the cohort, 58 (11.9%) patients developed US within 3 years after ICH. Analysis on the 362 patients without prophylactic ASM showed that craniotomy (HR 8.35, 95% CI 3.80-18.31) and acute symptomatic seizures (ASS) (HR 13.76, 95% CI 3.56-53.17) are independent predictors of US. No significant effect of prophylactic ASM use was found on incidence of US in ICH patients with craniotomy (P = 0.369).

CONCLUSIONS

Craniotomy and acute symptomatic seizures were independent predictors for unprovoked seizures after ICH, suggesting that more attention should be paid for such patients during follow-up. Whether prophylactic ASM treatment benefits ICH patients underwent craniotomy remains uncertain.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Seizure Prophylaxis Among Adults After Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Older adults occasionally receive seizure prophylaxis in an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) setting, despite safety concerns. There are no trial data available about the net impact of early seizure prophylaxis on post-AIS survival.

METHODS

Using a stroke registry (American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines) individually linked to electronic health records, we examined the effect of initiating seizure prophylaxis (ie, epilepsy-specific antiseizure drugs) within 7 days of an AIS admission versus not initiating in patients ≥65 years admitted for a new, nonsevere AIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity score ≤20) between 2014 and 2021 with no recorded use of epilepsy-specific antiseizure drugs in the previous 3 months. We addressed confounding by using inverse-probability weights. We performed standardization accounting for pertinent clinical and health care factors (eg, National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity scale, prescription counts, seizure-like events).

RESULTS

The study sample included 151 patients who received antiseizure drugs and 3020 who did not. The crude 30-day mortality risks were 219 deaths per 1000 patients among epilepsy-specific antiseizure drugs initiators and 120 deaths per 1000 among noninitiators. After standardization, the estimated mortality was 251 (95% CI, 190-307) deaths per 1000 among initiators and 120 (95% CI, 86-144) deaths per 1000 among noninitiators, corresponding to a risk difference of 131 (95% CI, 65-200) excess deaths per 1000 patients. In the prespecified subgroup analyses, the risk difference was 52 (95% CI, 11-72) among patients with minor AIS and 138 (95% CI, 52-222) among moderate-to-severe AIS patients. Similarly, the risk differences were 86 (95% CI, 18-118) and 157 (95% CI, 57-219) among patients aged 65 to 74 years and ≥75 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a higher risk of 30-day mortality associated with initiating versus not initiating seizure prophylaxis within 7 days post-AIS. This study does not support the role of seizure prophylaxis in reducing 30-day poststroke mortality.

Electrographic Seizures in the Critically Ill

Identifying and treating critically ill patients with seizures can be challenging. In this article, the authors review the available data on patient populations at risk, seizure prognostication with tools such as 2HELPS2B, electrographic seizures and the various ictal-interictal continuum patterns with their latest definitions and associated risks, ancillary testing such as imaging studies, serum biomarkers, and invasive multimodal monitoring. They also illustrate 5 different patient scenarios, their treatment and outcomes, and propose recommendations for targeted treatment of electrographic seizures in critically ill patients.

Closing the Gap in Pediatric Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review

Pediatric hemorrhagic stroke (HS) accounts for a large proportion of childhood strokes, 1 of the top 10 causes of pediatric deaths. Morbidity and mortality lead to significant socio-economic and psychosocial burdens. To understand published data on recognizing and managing children with HS, we conducted a systematic review of the literature presented here. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library databases limited to English language and included 174 studies, most conducted in the USA (52%). Terminology used interchangeably for HS included intraparenchymal/intracranial hemorrhage, spontaneous ICH, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Key assessments informing prognosis and management included clinical scoring (Glasgow coma scale), and neuroimaging. HS etiologies reported were systemic coagulopathy (genetic, acquired pathologic, or iatrogenic), or focal cerebrovascular lesions (brain arteriovenous malformations, cavernous malformations, aneurysms, or tumor vascularity). Several scales were used to measure outcome: Glasgow outcome score (GOS), Kings outcome score for head injury (KOSCHI), modified Rankin scale (mRS) and pediatric stroke outcome measure (PSOM). Most studies described treatments of at-risk lesions. Few studies described neurocritical care management including raised ICP, seizures, vasospasm, or blood pressure. Predictors of poor outcome included ethnicity, comorbidity, location of bleed, and hematoma >2% of total brain volume. Motor and cognitive outcomes followed independent patterns. Few studies reported on cognitive outcomes, rehabilitation, and transition of care models. Interdisciplinary approach to managing HS is urgently needed, informed by larger cohort studies targeting key clinical question (eg development of a field-guide for the clinician managing patients with HS that is reproducible internationally).

Safety and efficacy of prophylactic levetiracetam for prevention of epileptic seizures in the acute phase of intracerebral haemorrhage (PEACH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early seizures (occurring within 7 days of stroke onset) after intracerebral haemorrhage reaches 30% when subclinical seizures are diagnosed by continuous EEG. Early seizures might be associated with haematoma expansion and worse neurological outcomes. Current guidelines do not recommend prophylactic antiseizure treatment in this setting. We aimed to assess whether prophylactic levetiracetam would reduce the risk of acute seizures in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.

METHODS

The double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PEACH trial was conducted at three stroke units in France. Patients (aged 18 years or older) who presented with a non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage within 24 h after onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to levetiracetam (intravenous 500 mg every 12 h) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done with a web-based system and stratified by centre and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at baseline. Treatment was continued for 6 weeks. Continuous EEG was started within 24 h after inclusion and recorded over 48 h. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one clinical seizure within 72 h of inclusion or at least one electrographic seizure recorded on continuous EEG, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment and who had a continuous EEG performed. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02631759, and is now closed. Recruitment was prematurely stopped after 48% of the recruitment target was reached due to a low recruitment rate and cessation of funding.

FINDINGS

Between June 1, 2017, and April 14, 2020, 50 patients with mild-to-moderate severity intracerebral haemorrhage were included: 24 were assigned to levetiracetam and 26 to placebo. During the first 72 h, a clinical or electrographic seizure was observed in three (16%) of 19 patients in the levetiracetam group versus ten (43%) of 23 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio 0·16, 95% CI 0·03-0·94, p=0·043). All seizures in the first 72 h were electrographic seizures only. No difference in depression or anxiety reporting was observed between the groups at 1 month or 3 months. Depression was recorded in three (13%) patients who received levetiracetam versus four (15%) patients who received placebo, and anxiety was reported for two (8%) patients versus one (4%) patient. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the levetiracetam group versus the placebo group were headache (nine [39%] vs six [24%]), pain (three [13%] vs ten [40%]), and falls (seven [30%] vs four [16%]). The most frequent serious adverse events were neurological deterioration due to the intracerebral haemorrhage (one [4%] vs four [16%]) and severe pneumonia (two [9%] vs two [8%]). No treatment-related death was reported in either group.

INTERPRETATION

Levetiracetam might be effective in preventing acute seizures in intracerebral haemorrhage. Larger studies are needed to determine whether seizure prophylaxis improves functional outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.

FUNDING

French Ministry of Health.