Association of Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Shunt Size With Stroke Recurrence and Benefit From Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Morphological Features of Patent Foramen Ovale Compared Between Older and Young Patients With Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

The morphology of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) with a high-risk for cryptogenic ischemic stroke (CS) is an important factor in the selection of patients for transcatheter closure, but the morphological features of PFO in older patients with a history of CS are less known because the most data are obtained from younger patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 169 patients who had a history of CS and PFO. The prevalence of high-risk morphologies of PFO assessed by transesophageal echocardiography was compared between patients aged ≥60 years and patients aged <60 years. We also assessed the presence of septal malalignment of PFO on the aortic wall. The probability of CS due to PFO was evaluated using the PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood classification system. Patients aged ≥60 years had a significantly higher prevalence of atrial septal aneurysm than patients aged <60 years. The prevalence of large right-to-left shunt, long-tunnel of PFO, or Eustachian valve or Chiari's network was similar between patients aged ≥60 years and <60 years. Septal malalignment was observed more frequently in patients aged ≥60 years than in those <60 years old. Nearly 90% of patients aged ≥60 years were classified as 'possible' in the PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood classification system.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk morphologies of PFO are common in older patients with a history of CS, as well as in younger patients.

Determinants of adverse outcomes following patent foramen ovale closure in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure outcomes in the elderly.

AIMS

Through this study, we aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of adverse events (recurrent cerebrovascular events [CVE] and atrial fibrillation [AF]) post-PFO closure in older patients with cryptogenic events.

METHODS

This multicentre international study included patients over 60 years undergoing PFO closure for cryptogenic thromboembolic events. A dedicated database compiled baseline, procedural, and follow-up data. Competing risk and adjusted outcome predictor analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 689 patients were included (median age 65 years, 41.2% female, mean Risk of Paradoxical Embolism [RoPE] score 4.5). The procedural success rate was 99.4%. After a median follow-up of 2 (interquartile range 1-5) years, 66 patients (9.6%) had died. CVE and stroke rates were 1.21 and 0.55 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-9.07; p=0.002) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA; HR 5.25, 95% CI: 1.56-17.62; p=0.007) increased the CVE risk. New-onset AF occurred at a rate of 3.30 per 100 patient-years, with 51.3% within one month post-procedure. Older age (HR 1.05 per year, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09; p=0.023) and the absence of hypertension (HR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.19-3.57; p=0.010) were associated with an increased risk of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients undergoing PFO closure had a relatively low rate of CVE and new-onset AF after a median follow-up of 2 years. The presence of diabetes, ASA, and a more advanced age determined an increased risk of adverse clinical events. These factors may be considered in the clinical decision-making process regarding PFO closure in this challenging population.

Every Patent Foramen Ovale Should Be Closed

At present, the patent foramen ovale (PFO) does not receive the deserved medical attention. The PFO poses a serious threat to health and even the life of mankind. The first respective case report in the medical literature dates back to the 19th century. It led to death. The fact that a PFO is present in roughly 25% of people underscores its overall potential to cause harm. Yet at the same time, the sheer number discourages the medical community from screening for it and from treating it. About 5% of the population have particularly dangerous forms of PFOs. Such PFOs portray a high enough risk for clinical events, the likes of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or ocular, visceral, and peripheral embolism, to justify screening for them. Highly significant health incidents being at stake, it appears obvious that PFO closure should be used for primary prevention. This is supported by the fact that closing a PFO is the simplest intervention in cardiology, with presumably the highest clinical yield. Being mainly a preventive measure, PFO closure represents a mechanical vaccination. When closing PFOs for one of the rarer therapeutic indications (migraine, platypnea orthodeoxia, etc.), patients automatically profit from the collateral benefit of getting, at the same time, mechanically vaccinated for life against paradoxical embolism. Vice versa, closing a PFO for the prevention of paradoxical embolism betters or cures migraine or exercise dyspnea not infrequently, thereby improving quality of life as a collateral benefit.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for patent foramen ovale detection

Background

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with migraine, cryptogenic stroke (CS), and hypoxemia. However, which examination method is most reliable remains controversial. This study sought to investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (cU), including contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (cTCD), contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE), and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE), for PFO; and to determine the best diagnostic strategy.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included a total of 147 consecutive patients suspected PFO at The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between October 2019 and January 2022. The patients also underwent cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE examinations. The standard for the diagnosis of PFO was confirmation of the presence of PFO by color Doppler flow signals or contrast microbubbles (MBs) passing through the foramen ovale.

Results

A total of 123 patients were diagnosed with PFO and 24 patients without PFO during the study period. The detectable rates of cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE were 120 (97.56%), 110 (89.43%), and 121 (98.37%), respectively. The sensitivity between cTCD and cTEE for PFO were comparable [97.56%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 92.5% to 99.4% vs. 98.37%, 95% CI: 93.7% to 99.7%; P>0.99], and the sensitivity of both were higher than that of cTTE (89.43%, 95% CI: 82.3% to 94.0%; P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively). In addition, the specificity of cTEE for PFO was significantly higher than that of cTCD (100%, 95% CI: 82.3% to 100.0% vs. 75.00%, 95% CI: 53.0% to 89.4%; P<0.001) and cTTE (100%, 95% CI: 82.3% to 100.0% vs. 75.00%, 95% CI: 53.0% to 89.4%; P<0.001). Further, the semi-quantitative classification ability of cTCD for PFO with right-to-left shunt (RLS) was significantly higher than that of cTTE and cTEE (P=0.02 and P<0.001, respectively), and that of cTTE was significantly higher than that of cTEE (P=0.01). The Spearman analysis showed that the degree of RLS was positively correlated with the inner diameter of the PFO (r=0.695, P<0.001).

Conclusions

The combination of cTCD and cTEE may provide a favorable strategy for the diagnosis of PFO.

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Older Patients With Stroke: Patient Selection for Trial Feasibility

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Whether patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure benefits older patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke is unknown because randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have predominantly enrolled patients younger than 60 years of age. Our objective was to estimate anticipated effects of PFO closure in older patients to predict the numbers needed to plan an RCT.

METHODS

Effectiveness estimates are derived from major observational studies (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism [RoPE] Study and Oxford Vascular Study, together referred to as the "RoPE-Ox" database) and all 6 major RCTs (Systematic, Collaborative, PFO Closure Evaluation [SCOPE] Consortium). To estimate stroke recurrence risk, observed outcomes were calculated for patients older than 60 years in the age-inclusive observational databases (n = 549). To estimate the reduction in the rate of recurrent stroke associated with PFO closure vs medical therapy based on the RoPE score and the presence of high-risk PFO features, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed on the RCT data in the SCOPE database (n = 3,740). These estimates were used to calculate sample sizes required for a future RCT.

RESULTS

Five-year risk of stroke recurrence using Kaplan-Meier estimates was 13.7 (95% CI 10.5-17.9) overall, 14.9% (95% CI 10.2-21.6) in those with high-risk PFO features. Predicted relative reduction in the event rate with PFO closure was 12.9% overall, 48.8% in those with a high-risk PFO feature. Using these estimates, enrolling all older patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO would require much larger samples than those used for prior PFO closure trials, but selectively enrolling patients with high-risk PFO features would require totals of 630 patients for 90% power and 471 patients for 80% power, with an average of 5 years of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Based on our projections, anticipated effect sizes in older patients with high-risk features make a trial in these subjects feasible. With lengthening life expectancy in almost all regions of the world, the utility of PFO closure in older adults is increasingly important to explore.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after stroke

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with cryptogenic ischaemic stroke. Potential stroke mechanisms include paradoxical embolism from a venous clot which traverses the PFO, in situ clot formation within the PFO, and atrial arrhythmias due to electrical signalling disruption. The purpose of this guideline is to provide recommendations for diagnosing, treating, and long-term managing patients with ischaemic stroke and PFO. Conversely, Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) was not considered an index event in this context because only one RCT involved TIA patients. However, this subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between TIA and stroke outcomes. The working group identified questions and outcomes, graded evidence, and developed recommendations following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for guideline development. This document underwent peer-review by independent experts and members of the ESO Guideline Board and Executive Committee. The working group acknowledges the current evidentiary gap in delineating an unequivocal diagnostic algorithm for the detection of PFO. Although transoesophageal echocardiography is conventionally held as the most accurate diagnostic tool for PFO identification, its status as the 'gold standard' remains unsubstantiated by rigorously validated evidence. We found high-quality evidence to recommend PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy in selected patients aged 18-60 years in whom no other evident cause of stroke is found but a PFO (i.e. PFO-associated stroke). The PASCAL classification system can be used to select such candidates for PFO closure. Patients with both a large right-to-left shunt and an atrial septal aneurysm benefit most from PFO closure. There is insufficient evidence to make an evidence-based recommendation on PFO closure in patients older than 60 and younger than 18 years. We found low quality evidence to suggest against PFO closure in patients with unlikely PFO-related stroke according to the PASCAL classification, except in specific scenarios (Expert Consensus). We suggest against long-term anticoagulation in patients with PFO-associated stroke unless anticoagulation is indicated for other medical reasons. Regarding the long-term AF monitoring after PFO closure, the working group concluded that there remains significant uncertainty regarding the risks and benefits associated with the use of long-term cardiac monitoring, such as implantable loop recorders. This document provides additional guidance, in the form of evidence-based recommendations or expert consensus statements, on diagnostic methods for PFO detection, and medical management after PFO closure.

Does Atrial Septal Anatomy Still Matter in the Etiological Evaluation of Ischemic Stroke Beyond the Age of 60?

BACKGROUND

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is causally associated with stroke in some patients younger than 60 years, especially when it is large or associated with an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). After 60 years of age, this association is less well understood. We assessed the relationships between detailed atrial septal anatomy and the cryptogenic nature of stroke in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed all patients aged 60 to 80 years admitted to our stroke center for ischemic stroke who underwent contrast echocardiography between 2016 and 2021. The atherosclerosis, small-vessel disease, cardiac pathology, other causes, and dissection (ASCOD) classification was used to reevaluate the etiological workup. Associations between cryptogenic stroke and (1) PFO presence or (2) categories of PFO anatomy (nonlarge PFO without ASA, nonlarge PFO with ASA, large PFO without ASA, and large PFO with ASA) were assessed using logistic regression. Among 533 patients (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score=1), PFO was present in 152 (prevalence, 28.5% [95% CI, 24.9-32.5]). Compared with noncryptogenic stroke, cryptogenic stroke (n=218) was associated with PFO presence (44.5% versus 17.5%; P<0.0001). Among patients with a PFO, septal anatomy categories were associated with cryptogenic stroke (P=0.02), with a strong association for patients with both large PFO and ASA (38.1% versus 14.5%, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

PFO presence remains strongly associated with cryptogenic stroke between 60 and 80 years of age. Large PFO, ASA, and their association were strongly associated with cryptogenic stroke in this age group. Our results support performing contrast echocardiography even after 60 years of age, although the optimal secondary prevention therapy in this population remains to be determined in randomized trials.

Patent Foramen Ovale Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention: State-of-the-Art Appraisal of Current Evidence

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with ischemic stroke. Randomized controlled trials provide robust evidence supporting PFO closure in selected patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke; however, several questions remain unanswered. This report summarizes current knowledge on the epidemiology of PFO-associated stroke, the role of PFO as a cause of stroke, and anatomic high-risk features. We also comment on breakthrough developments in patient selection algorithms for PFO closure in relation to the PFO-associated stroke causal likelihood risk stratification system. We further highlight areas for future research in PFO-associated stroke including the efficacy and safety of PFO closure in the elderly population, incidence, and long-term consequences of atrial fibrillation post-PFO closure, generalizability of the results of clinical trials in the real world, and the need for assessing the effect of neurocardiology teams on adherence to international recommendations. Other important knowledge gaps such as sex, race/ethnicity, and regional disparities in access to diagnostic technologies, PFO closure devices, and clinical outcomes in the real world are also discussed as priority research topics.

Comparative evaluation of intracardiac, transesophageal, and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of patent foramen ovale: A retrospective single-center study

INTRODUCTION

Certain patent foramen ovale (PFO) characteristics, such as a large right-to-left shunt (RLS) or atrial septal aneurysm, identify patients who may receive the highest clinical benefit from percutaneous PFO closure. This study aimed to compare intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with standard echocardiographic imaging in the evaluation of high-risk PFO characteristics and RLS severity in patients with PFO-associated stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent percutaneous PFO closure for PFO-associated stroke and received all three ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modalities and had interpretable results (N = 51). We then compared RLS severity, high-risk PFO characteristics, and the proportion of patients with a higher likelihood of PFO-associated stroke by ICE versus transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE).

RESULTS

The final cohort had a mean (±SE) age of 48.4 (±1.8) years and was predominantly female (58.8%). ICE was more likely to identify a large RLS versus TTE/TEE combined (66.7% vs. 45.1%; p = 0.03). The use of ICE resulted in significantly more patients being reclassified as having a higher likelihood of PFO-associated stroke (TTE vs. TEE vs. ICE: 10.4% vs. 14.6% vs. 25%; p = 0.03). A high-quality bubble study was found to be the single most important factor associated with identifying a larger RLS across all modalities (ρ [p]; TTE: 0.49 [<0.001], TEE: 0.60 [<0.001], ICE: 0.32 [0.02]). The presence of a hypermobile septum was associated with significantly greater RLS on ICE (ρ [p]: 0.3 [0.03]), especially with poor quality bubble studies (ρ [p]: 0.49 [0.02]).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study of patients with PFO-associated stroke, ICE detected a large RLS more frequently than TTE and TEE; and reclassified some patients as having a higher likelihood of PFO-associated stroke.

Cerebrovascular Events in Older Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, along with medical therapy, has emerged as the therapeutic gold standard in younger (<60-year-old) patients with a PFO-related stroke for preventing recurrent events. However, PFO management guidelines lack definite recommendations for older (>60 years) patients with a PFO-related cerebrovascular event, a complex group of patients who were mostly excluded from PFO closure clinical trials. Nevertheless, several studies have shown a higher prevalence of PFO among older patients with cryptogenic stroke, and its presence has been associated with an increased risk of recurrent events. Furthermore, older patients exhibit a higher prevalence of high-risk PFO anatomical features, present inherent age-related risk factors that might increase the risk of paradoxical embolism through a PFO, and have a higher incidence of ischemic events after a PFO-related event. Additionally, observational studies have shown the safety and preliminary efficacy of PFO closure in older PFO-related stroke patients. Yet, higher rates of recurrent cerebrovascular events and new-onset atrial fibrillation were observed in some studies among older patients compared to their younger counterparts. After careful case-by-case evaluation, including the assessment of hidden potential cardioembolic sources of a cryptogenic stroke other than PFO, transcatheter PFO closure might be a safe and effective therapeutic option for preventing recurrent thromboembolic events in patients >60 years with a high-risk PFO-associated stroke. Ongoing trials will provide important insights into the role of PFO closure in the elderly population.

Pearls and Pitfalls in the Transesophageal Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale

Large randomized controlled trials have shown the benefits of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO. Recent studies have highlighted the clinical significance and prognostic implication of various anatomical features of PFO and the adjacent atrial septum, such as atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), PFO size, large shunt, and hypermobility. Transthoracic echocardiography with contrast study is used for the indirect diagnosis of PFO, as it reveals the passage of the contrast into the left atrium. In contrast, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers a direct demonstration of PFO by measuring its size using the maximum separation distance between the septum primum and septum secundum. Furthermore, TEE enables the acquisition of detailed anatomical features of the adjacent atrial septum including ASA, hypermobility, and PFO tunnel length, which carry significant prognostic implications. Transesophageal echocardiography also facilitates the diagnosis of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, a relatively rare cause of paradoxical embolism. This review provides evidence for supporting TEE as a useful screening test for patients with cryptogenic stroke to identify suitable candidates for percutaneous device closure of PFO. Additionally, cardiac imaging specialists with proficiency in comprehensive TEE examination should be part of the heart-brain team for proper evaluation of and decision-making in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Effectiveness of Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Clinical Practice

Background Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has reduced the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic strokes in randomized clinical trials. Whether PFO closure in clinical practice is associated with similar benefit remains unknown. Methods and Results We identified patients with PFO and a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who were treated with PFO closure or medical therapy in the OptumLabs database. The primary end point was recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. Secondary outcomes included mortality, all stroke, transient ischemic attack, and major bleeding. A total of 6668 propensity-matched patients were included (PFO closure n=4111; medical therapy n=2557). The incidence of stroke or systemic embolization per 100 person-years was 2.38 after PFO cohort and 2.99 with medical therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.68-1.05], P=0.13). Mortality was lower in the PFO closure cohort (1.78 versus 2.59 per 100 person-years: HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.87], P=0.002). Falsification end points showed that this difference is unlikely to be completely explained by residual confounders. There were no significant differences between the groups in secondary end points including intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding except for an increase in nonintracranial hemorrhage bleeding among patients treated with oral anticoagulation (1.42 versus 2.16 per 100 person-years: HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.99], P=0.043). The main end point was consistent in subanalyses including patients <60 years of age, patients with prior stroke, and those treated after the publication of the positive PFO trials in 2017. Conclusions In contemporary US practice, PFO closure is not associated with lower rates of recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolization compared with medical therapy. Potential reasons for this discrepancy warrant further investigation.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke

Though rare, stroke in infants and children is an important cause of mortality and chronic morbidity in the pediatric population. Neuroimaging advances and implementation of pediatric stroke care protocols have led to the ability to rapidly diagnose stroke and in many cases determine the stroke etiology. Though data on efficacy of hyperacute therapies, such as intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, in pediatric stroke are limited, feasibility and safety data are mounting and support careful consideration of these treatments for childhood stroke. Recent therapeutic advances allow for targeted stroke prevention efforts in high-risk conditions, such as moyamoya, sickle cell disease, cardiac disease, and genetic disorders. Despite these exciting advances, important knowledge gaps persist, including optimal dosing and type of thrombolytic agents, inclusion criteria for mechanical thrombectomy, the role of immunomodulatory therapies for focal cerebral arteriopathy, optimal long-term antithrombotic strategies, the role of patent foramen ovale closure in pediatric stroke, and optimal rehabilitation strategies after stroke of the developing brain.

Comparison of Sex Based In-Hospital Procedural Outcomes and Hospital Readmission Frequency After Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device Placement: A Propensity Matched National Cohort

INTRODUCTION

PFO occluder device has been shown to reduce the chance of recurrent stroke in clinically indication per guidelines, stroke is higher in females but procedural efficacy and complications based on sex difference is not well studied in literature.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to create sex cohorts using ICD-10 Procedural code for elective PFO occluder device placement performed during the years 2016-2019. The two groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models that matched for confounders to report multivariate odd's ratio (mOR) for primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute ischemic stroke, post-procedure bleeding, and cardiac tamponade. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17.

RESULTS

A total of 5,818 patients who underwent PFO occluder device placement were identified, of which 3,144 (54.0%) were females, and 2,673 (46.0%) were males. There was no difference in periprocedural in-hospital mortality, new onset acute ischemic stroke, post-procedural bleeding, or cardiac tamponade between both sexes undergoing occluder device placement. AKI onset was higher in males as compared to females after matching for CKD (mOR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.48-0.92]; p=0.016) this can be procedural or can be secondary to volume status or nephrotoxins. Males also had a higher length of stay (LOS) at their index hospitalization (2 days vs 1 day) which led to slightly higher total hospitalization cost ($26,585 vs $24,265). Our data did not show a statistically significant difference in the readmission LOS trends between the two groups at 30, 90, and 180 days.

CONCLUSION

PFO occluder is equally efficacious in both sex and no significant difference in sex-based complications noticed on national cohort analysis. AKI occurrence was high in males that can be limited due to unavailability of data about hydration status and nephrotoxic medications.

Dilemmas in hematology: consults in patients with arterial thrombosis

Arterial thrombotic events, particularly ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, are common, and mostly occur due to atherosclerotic disease or arrhythmias. The diagnosis and management of the majority of such events occurs without the involvement of a hematologist, following established guidelines or pathways. In this review, we discuss 3 scenarios in which optimal management is less certain. These scenarios concern patients with a left ventricular thrombus, in whom the duration and choice of anticoagulant has been debated, patients with ischemic stroke and a patent foramen ovale, in whom the role of patent foramen ovale closure requires careful consideration, and the role of thrombophilia testing in young patients after a stroke or myocardial infarction, which remains an area of contention. We consider the available evidence and published guidelines in order to provide a practical, evidence-based approach to these 3 clinical scenarios.