Consolidative Radiotherapy for Limited Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Stereotactic body radiotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer: a knowledge and attitudes survey in collaboration with the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) and Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO) groups

The aim of this study was to present a nationwide survey on the specialist's attitudes towards stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) with oligometastatic/oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent ovarian cancer (oMPR-OC) patients. The 19-item questionnaire was developed by specialists and distributed online. Replies were stratified by categories and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Respondents ( N = 100) were radiation oncologists (57%), medical oncologists (32%), and gynecologic oncologists (11%). Fifty-four percent of respondents considered medical oncologists as the primary oncologists for oMPR-OC, while 23% preferred radiation oncologists and 15% favored gynecologic oncologists. Seventy-three percent discuss these cases in the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board, while 15, 6, and 2% send the patients straight to SBRT, surgery, or chemotherapy, respectively. Seventy-four percent of the experts interviewed were treated with SBRT less than 10 oMPR-OC patients. Concomitant treatment was highly heterogeneous, but it had little to no reported side effects. A significant variation in how PARPi is managed during SBRT was found: 34% do not interrupt the administration, while 52% pause and restart it later. Forty-three percent of respondents believe that the PARPi dosage should not be reduced when administered concurrently with SBRT. Sixty-nine percent of respondents believe that the SBRT dose should not be decreased while receiving PARPi if the constraints are met. The majority of respondents (40%) favored expert consensus for enhancing the clinical management of oMPR-OC, while 34% preferred clinical guidelines. A lack of or low toxicity with the combination of PARPi and SBRT was perceived, and a significant degree of heterogeneity concerning clinical protocols for their combination. Moreover, it emphasizes the low number of patients who have received this treatment approach nationwide.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer Lymph Node Disease: The MITO-RT3/RAD Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

MITO-RT3/RAD (NCT04593381) is a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients who received diagnoses of oligometastatic ovarian cancer. In this report, we provide the results of the trial in the setting of lymph node disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, secondary endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, treatment-free interval, and toxicity rates. The sample size was based on a previous study reporting an average 70.0% CR with SBRT. The study was powered to detect an improvement in the CR rate from 70.0% to 85.0%, with an α error of 0.05 (one-side) and a β error of 0.1.

RESULTS

The study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant improvement in CR. One hundred thirty-five patients with 249 lesions were enrolled across 15 institutions from May 2019 to November 2023. CRs were observed in 194 lesions (77.9%), partial responses in 40 (16.1%), stable disease in 14 (5.6%), and progressive disease in 1 lesion (0.4%). The objective response rate was 94%, with an overall clinical benefit rate of 99.6%. CR lesions exhibited a significantly higher LC rate than partial or not responding lesions (12-month LC: 92.7% vs 63.1%, P < .001). The 12-month actuarial rates for PFS and for overall survival were 36.6% (CR, 38.3% vs not-CR, 18.8%; P, .022) and 97.2% (CR, 97.8% vs not-CR, 93.8%; P, .067), respectively. The 12-month actuarial rate for treatment-free interval was 52.7% (CR, 58.4% vs not-CR, 24.4%; P, .004). CR was substantially associated with higher PFS (P, .036) and treatment-free interval (P, .006) rates in the univariate analysis. Twenty-three patients (17.0%) experienced mild acute toxicity. Late toxicity was reported in 9 patients (6.7%), mostly grade 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial confirms the efficacy of ablative SBRT, with minimal toxicity observed. SBRT offered a high CR rate, promising long-term outcomes, and a significant systemic therapy-free survival period for complete responders.

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Impact of local and contemporary systemic treatment approaches on clinical outcome

Oligometastatic (OMD) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct but heterogeneous entity. Current guidelines recommend systemic therapy and consolidation with local ablative therapy (LAT). However, evidence regarding the optimal choice of multimodal treatment approaches is lacking, in particular with respect to the integration of immunotherapy. This real-world study identified 218 patients with OMD NSCLC (2004-2023, prespecified criteria: ≤5 metastases in ≤2 organ systems) from three major German comprehensive cancer centers. Most patients had one (72.5%) or two (17.4%) metastatic lesions in a single (89.9%) organ system. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with a single metastatic lesion (HR 0.54, p = .003), and female gender (HR 0.4, p < .001). Median OS of the full cohort was 27.8 months, with 29% survival at 5 years. Patients who had completed LAT to all NSCLC sites, typically excluding patients with early progression, had a median OS of 34.4 months (37.7% 5-year OS rate) with a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 10.9 months (13.3% at 5 years). In those patients, systemic treatment as part of first-line therapy was associated with doubling of RFS (12.3 vs. 6.4 months, p < .001). Despite limited follow-up of patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy (EU approval 2018/2019), RFS was greatly improved by adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy (HR 0.44, p = .008, 2-year RFS 51.4% vs. 15.1%). In conclusion, patients with OMD NSCLC benefitted from multimodality approaches integrating systemic therapy and local ablation of all cancer sites. A substantial proportion of patients achieved extended OS, suggesting a potential for cure that can be further augmented with the addition of immunotherapy.

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) commonly is used for small liver metastases. Modern conformal radiotherapy techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy, enable the safe delivery of SABR to small liver volumes. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs, such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. Controlling respiratory motion, the use of image guidance, and increasing the number of radiation fractions sometimes are necessary for the safe delivery of SABR in these situations.

Recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer

Lung cancer has a poor prognosis, and further improvements in outcomes are needed. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of unresectable lung cancer, and there have been recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer. However, to date, there have been few reviews on the improvement in treatment outcomes associated with high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Thus, this review aimed to summarize the recent developments in radiotherapy techniques and indicate the future directions in the use of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable stage I lung cancer has been reported to improve local control rates without severe adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis. For locally advanced lung cancer, a combination of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors dramatically improves treatment outcomes, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enables safer radiation therapy with less frequent pneumonitis. Particle beam therapy, such as carbon-ion radiotherapy and proton beam therapy, has been administered as advanced medical care for patients with lung cancer. Since 2024, it has been covered under insurance for early stage lung cancer with tumors ≤ 5 cm in size in Japan. In addition to chemotherapy, local ablative radiotherapy improves treatment outcomes in patients with oligometastatic stage IV lung cancer. A particular problem with radiotherapy for lung cancer is that the target location changes with respiratory motion, and various physical methods have been used to control respiratory motion. Recently, coronavirus disease has had a major impact on lung cancer treatment, and cancer treatment during situations, such as the coronavirus pandemic, must be performed carefully. To improve treatment outcomes for lung cancer, it is necessary to fully utilize evolving radiotherapy modalities, and the role of radiotherapy in lung cancer treatment is expected to increase.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Malignant Disease (RADIANT): Oncologic Outcomes From a Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

In oligoprogressive (OP) cancer, there are a limited number of metastatic areas progressing on a background of stable or responding to widespread cancer. Although the standard of care for OP is changing systemic therapy (ST), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is being explored as an alternative local therapy targeting the sites of progression.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

RADIANT (NCT04122469) was a single-center phase 2 study of patients with metastatic genitourinary (GU), breast, and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, receiving ST for ≥3 months, with radiographic OP disease in ≤5 sites. Patients received SBRT for all OP disease in 1 to 5 fractions and were maintained on ST. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of change in ST, which was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as toxicity and health-related quality of life. Comparisons between diagnosis groups were done using the log-rank test. A 2-sided p value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were analyzed, with a median age of 69 years; 32 patients (46%) were women; the median number of lines of prior ST was 3. Primary sites were GU (n = 32; 46%), breast (n = 23; 33%), and GI (n = 15; 21%). The median follow-up was 12.3 months (IQR, 8.2-21.6 months). At 1 year, change in ST occurred in 47% (95% CI, 36%-61%) (GU 45%, breast 41%, and GI 60%; p = .23). PFS at 1 year was 32% (95% CI, 23%-45%), and median PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.1) (GU 4.8, breast 6.5, and GI 3.2), which significantly differed by disease type (p = .006). Overall survival was 75% at 1 year (95% CI, 65%-87%), which significantly differed between cancer types (GU 86%, breast 96%, and GI 22%; p < .001). The cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 toxicity was 1.2%, with 1 patient experiencing late grade 3 toxicity and no grade 4 to 5 acute or late toxicities. Health-related quality of life declined from the mean (SD) of 66.9 (20.2) at baseline to 60.5 (22.2) at 6 months, which did not meet the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for OP metastases delayed change in ST in approximately half of patients, warranting investigation in randomized trials.

1-year efficacy results after MR-guided risk-adapted stereotactic radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic oligometastases in a multicenter phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The SOFT (Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic sOFT tissue metastases) trial assesses the safety and efficacy of risk-adapted MR-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of infra-diaphragmatic soft tissue metastasis in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). This paper reports the one-year efficacy analysis and evaluates associations between local control (LC) and clinical and dosimetric parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study recruited patients from four MR-linac centers in Denmark and the US. Patients with De novo or recurrent OMD with ≤5 metastases in ≤3 organs and patients with induced OMD or oligoprogressive disease (OPD) with ≤3 metastases were eligible. Fractionation schemes were 45-75 Gy in 3-8 fractions.

RESULTS

The trial included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic lesions, primarily in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). The median follow-up time was 13.0 months, interquartile range (IQR) (11.7,13.7) months. The 1-year LC rate was 89 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (83,94 %). We did not observe any statistically significant associations between LC and clinical and dosimetric parameters. The median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, 95 % CI (6.0,9.4). One- and two-year overall survival was 82.6 %, 95 % CI (76.2 %,89.7 %), and 65.1 %, 95 % CI (56.4 %,75.3 %). Sixty-one patients (50 %) were kept off systemic therapy throughout the one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In our study, treatment with risk-adapted, MR-guided SABR resulted in a high one-year local control and survival rate and could keep half of the patients off systemic therapy within the first year of follow-up.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-spine bone metastases: A meta-analysis and international stereotactic radiosurgery society (ISRS) clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

While SBRT to NSBM has become common, particularly in the oligometastatic population, the approach to treating non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) varies widely across institutions and clinical trial protocols. We present a comprehensive systematic review of the literatures to inform practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies with at least 10 patients receiving SBRT for NSBM were identified and meta-analyses were completed to estimate pooled local control and overall survival rates. Published guidelines on NSBM SBRT were reviewed and consolidated.

RESULTS

There were 25 studies included for qualitative analysis and 18 studies for quantitative analysis consisting of 13 retrospective studies, 2 non-randomized prospective studies, 1 randomized phase 2/3 trial, and a subgroup analysis of a phase I trial. The pooled local control rates at 1 and 2 years were 95 % (95 % CI: 89 %-98 %) and 94 % (95 % CI: 86 %-98 %), respectively. Pooled overall survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 84 % (95 % CI: 73 %-91 %) and 81 % (95 % CI: 45 %-95 %), respectively. Consensus was reached on recommendations to inform treatment simulation, target delineation, dose fractionation, and anatomic site-specific recommendations.

CONCLUSION

We present ISRS-endorsed consensus recommendations to inform best practice of SBRT to NSBM, which we found to be efficacious and associated with low rates of adverse events.

Evolving Paradigms in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Multiple randomized trials have suggested that the addition of comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy to best systemic therapy improves disease control and survival among patients with oligometastatic disease, even for histologies with a high propensity for rapid spread. Here, we review the growing literature supporting the oligometastatic paradigm in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We summarize key details from nascent institutional series and reflect on the recently reported phase II randomized EXTEND trial. We discuss various strategies for enhancing the clinical and technical implementation of metastasis-directed therapy in this patient population. Lastly, we highlight multiple ongoing landmark trials seeking to optimize and validate the role of metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Ultimately, these and other continued clinical and translational research efforts will be critical to improve care and outcomes for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Characterization of the genomic landscape in liver oligometastatic NSCLC

OBJECTIVES

Emerging data have shown that local treatment could provide clinical benefit for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oligometastasis. Liver metastases have the worst prognosis in advanced NSCLC, but the genomic characteristics of liver oligometastasis remain unclear. The aim of our study was to elucidate the molecular features of liver oligometastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

Paired liver metastatic tissue samples and peripheral blood from 32 liver oligometastatic NSCLC patients were concurrently collected for comprehensive genomic analysis using next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 206 mutated genes in 32 patients were detected, with a median of 4 mutations per sample. The most frequent alterations (> 10%) in liver oligometastasis were TP53 (72%), EGFR (50%), RB1 (19%) and SMARCA4 (12%). The co-occurrence rate of TP53 and RB1 in our cohort was significantly higher than that in the TCGA-LUAD cohort. Age, APOBEC, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) established the mutational signature of liver oligometastatic NSCLC. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 4.8 mutations/Mb. A total of 78.12% patients harbored at least one potentially actionable molecular alteration that may guide further targeted therapy according to the OncoKB evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study comprehensively delineated the genomic characteristics of liver oligometastatic NSCLC - such findings were helpful to better understand the distinct clinic-biological features of oligometastasis and optimize personalized treatment of this population.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Clinical Practice Guideline on Surgical Management of Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving, with a preponderance of data supporting the benefits of such therapeutic approaches incorporating pulmonary resection for appropriately selected candidates. However, practices vary widely institutionally and regionally, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons assembled a panel of thoracic surgical oncologists to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence regarding the role of pulmonary resection as LCT. Clinical and research questions of interest were identified, and a complete literature review was conducted. Best practice guidelines were developed accordingly.

RESULTS

The panel identified 7 areas of controversy, and data were assimilated to support the best recommended practices related to these clinical issues. Ultimately, a number of issues in this realm were found to have a high level of evidence to support the role for surgical therapy in patients with stage IV lung cancer. However, the nuances of how these operations are conducted remain in equipoise, without ample evidence to support the extent of resection or nodal dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Clear data exist to support the use of surgical resection of the primary lung tumor as LCT in stage IV lung cancer. Evidence-based recommendations have been provided to guide multidisciplinary teams on the implementation of treatment plans as well as to guide researchers on areas of ongoing need for further investigation.

Single-arm multicenter phase II study on aggressive local consolidative therapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma with oligometastases: CURE-OLIGO (TORG1529)

INTRODUCTION

Stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with oligometastases is potentially curable by radical treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for thoracic disease, including the primary lesion and lymph node metastases, combined with local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastases.

METHODS

This was a multicenter Phase II trial for patients with Stage IV NSCLC with oligometastases for whom CRT for thoracic disease was feasible. The treatment procedures included CRT containing platinum-doublet for thoracic disease and LCT for oligometastases within 8 weeks of starting or completing CRT. The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate.

RESULTS

We enrolled 19 patients between June 2016 and May 2020. The median age was 68 (range: 51-74) years. Twelve patients had adenocarcinoma, and 6 had squamous cell carcinoma. The metastasis sites included the brain, bone, adrenal gland, lung, and cervical lymph node (n = 9, 7, 2, 1, and 1, respectively). All patients completed CRT concurrently with LCT for all oligometastases. There were 11 partial responses, resulting in a response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 33.5-79.7%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.6 (95% CI 7.0-10.2) and 42.1 (80% CI 13.6-not reached) months, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 68.4% (80% CI 52.6%-79.9%). Fourteen patients (74%) showed progression with newly observed lesions. There were no severe adverse events, and toxicities were tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy in combination with aggressive LCT for NSCLC with oligometastases might extend survival and achieve local control.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan (protocol identification number: UMIN000022431, first registration date: 01/JUN/2016).

Pulmonary Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Oligometastatic Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The value of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear, as existing evidence is primarily derived from retrospective single-center analyses with small patient cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pulmonary SBRT in patients with oligometastatic HNSCC and to identify factors associated with survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This trinational multicenter cohort study, including 16 centers from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, retrospectively analyzed patients with oligometastatic HNSCC undergoing SBRT for pulmonary metastases between 2010 and 2023. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and incidence of local failures.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients with 284 irradiated lung metastases were analyzed. The most common primary HNSCC subsites were oropharyngeal (n = 71), laryngeal (n = 37), and hypopharyngeal (n = 31). Lung metastases were treated with a median biologically effective dose (BEDα/β=10 Gy) of 105 Gy (IQR, 84-113) at the planning target volume periphery. After a median follow-up of 40 months (95% CI, 34-46), the median OS and progression-free survival were 33 months (95% CI, 26-40) and 9 months (95% CI, 7-11), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of local failures was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.2-8.8). One patient (0.6%) developed acute grade 3 dysphagia, and among 146 patients assessed for chronic toxicities, 2 (1.4%) experienced grade 3 events, with no grade 4-5 toxicities. On multivariable analysis, older (>65 years) patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.49; P = .040) and females (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.99; P = .035) exhibited worse OS, whereas longer time between HNSCC diagnosis and first SBRT was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = .045).

CONCLUSION

SBRT for pulmonary metastases achieves excellent local control with minimal toxicity in patients with oligometastatic HNSCC. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal timing for integrating SBRT with systemic treatment.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligoprogressive Cancers: Results of the Randomized Phase 2 STOP Trial

PURPOSE

This trial examined if patients with ≤5 sites of oligoprogression benefit from the addition of SABR to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We enrolled patients with 1 to 5 metastases progressing on systemic therapy, and after stratifying by type of systemic therapy (cytotoxic vs noncytotoxic), randomized 1:2 between continued SOC treatment versus SABR to all progressing lesions plus SOC. The trial was initially limited to non-small cell lung cancer but was expanded to include all nonhematologic malignancies to meet accrual goals. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), lesional control, quality of life, adverse events, and duration of systemic therapy postrandomization.

RESULTS

Ninety patients with 127 oligoprogressive metastases were enrolled across 8 Canadian institutions, with 59 randomized to SABR and 31 to SOC. The median age was 67 years, and 39 (43%) were women. The most common primary sites were lung (44%), genitourinary (23%), and breast (13%). Protocol adherence in the SOC arm was suboptimal, with 11 patients (35%) either receiving high-dose/ablative therapies (conflicting with trial protocol) or withdrawing from the study. The median follow-up was 31 months. There was no difference in PFS between arms (median PFS 8.4 months in the SABR arm vs 4.3 months in the SOC arm, but curves cross and 2-year PFS was 9% vs 24%, respectively; P = .91). The median OS was 31.2 months versus 27.4 months, respectively (P = .22). Lesional control was superior with SABR (70% vs 38%, respectively; P = .0015). There were 2 (3.4%) grade 3 and no grade 4/5 adverse events attributable to SABR.

CONCLUSIONS

SABR was well-tolerated with superior lesional control but did not improve PFS or OS. Accrual to this study was difficult, and the results may have been impacted by an unwillingness to forgo ablative treatments on the SOC arm. (NCT02756793).

Predictors of brain metastases in patients with oligometastatic solid tumours treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

In patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), those who develop brain metastases (BrM) may have poor outcomes. We aimed to investigate variables associated with BrM development in this population.

METHODS

Patients with ≤ 5 extracranial metastases from solid tumors treated with SBRT from 2008 to 2016 at Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre were included. We investigated the association between covariates and CIBrM (cumulative incidence of BrM) using Fine-Gray analysis, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression. We investigated the association between extracranial progression and CIBrM using time-based conditional analysis.

RESULTS

Among 404 patients, the most common primary sites were lung, colorectal, prostate, breast and kidney. Median follow-up was 49 months. Median PFS was 25 months. Median OS was 70 months. 58 patients developed BrM, and 5-year CIBrM was 16%. On multivariable analysis, number of extracranial metastases, location of metastases, total planning target volume (PTV), and time from primary diagnosis to OMD were not associated with CIBrM, although several of these variables were associated with extracranial PFS and OS. Primary site was associated with CIBrM, with colorectal and prostate cancer associated with lower CIBrM compared to lung cancer. Widespread extracranial progression (≥ 5 sites) within 24, 36, 48 and 60 months of OMD diagnosis was independently associated with higher CIBrM.

CONCLUSION

In patients with OMD treated with SBRT, baseline variables related to extracranial disease burden and distribution were not associated with BrM development, while primary site and widespread extracranial progression were associated with BrM development.

Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with oligometastatic disease involving only the brain in the era of PET/CT

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been improving owing to advancements in imaging techniques and new treatment approaches such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes, including the clinical course after recurrence, of patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC with only brain metastases, treated with bifocal treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with clinical T1-4 and N0-1 NSCLC with synchronous brain metastases who were diagnosed by preoperative PET/CT and brain CT or MRI and underwent pulmonary resection for the primary site and surgery or radiation therapy for brain metastases at our institution from 2005 to 2019.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 60 months. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate and overall survival rates after pulmonary resection were 31.8% and 58.7%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, pathological N0 status was significantly associated with better recurrence-free survival, but not overall survival. The median survival after recurrence was 24 months. Aggressive brain treatment at sites of recurrence and the use of TKIs after recurrence have significantly prolonged prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcomes in patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC with brain metastases who underwent bifocal treatment, including pulmonary resection, were favorable. In particular, bifocal treatment may provide a chance for cure in patients without lymph node involvement.

Multi-institutional study using sbrt to treat mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy

Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy (MHL) is a common pattern of cancer spread, particularly in lung disease. Recently, there has been interest in the use of SBRT for MHL, especially in the oligometastatic setting. The goal is to improve local control (LC) and to achieve shorter treatment durations to minimize systemic treatment interruptions. The primary endpoint of this study was local control (LC). The secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) and predictive factors of response. This is a retrospective study. It analyses a group of patients treated with SBRT for MHL with different primary tumours and histologies. From November 2007 to June 2023, we treated 159 MHL in 128 patients. The primary most represented was lung cancer. A single fraction was used in 16% of cases and multiple fractions in 84% of cases. The medium BED 10 was 75.06 Gy (range: 37-120 Gy). Actuarial LC rates at 1, 2 and 5 years were 80.0%, 78.8% and 75.2%. The actuarial DMFS rates at 1, 2 and 5 years were 43.9%, 34.1% and 14.1%, respectively. Actuarial PFS rates at 1, 2 and 5 years were 37.2%, 23.9% and 8.3%, respectively. Actuarial OS rates at 1, 2 and 5 years were 68.8%, 52.7% and 26.9%, respectively. SBRT may be an option for the treatment of MHL. In addition, achieving a complete response is one of the most important predictors of our endpoints, in addition to tumour burden and volume.

Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

Oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer is a clinical entity with no standard treatment recommendation. Treatment with curative intent has recently emerged as an option for selected patients in contrast to the traditional palliative treatment strategy. This prospective study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combined systemic and local treatment with curative intent for patients with oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

METHODS

In a multicenter study, consecutive patients with gastroesophageal cancer and metastases in the liver and/or extra-regional lymph nodes were screened for inclusion. Eligible patients were offered curatively intended perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection or liver ablation. Primary endpoints were treatment safety and feasibility. Secondary outcomes included postoperative mortality, treatment response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Subgroup analyses were stratified based on oligometastatic location.

RESULTS

A total of 29 (82.9%) patients completed treatment with surgical resection (93.1%), liver ablation (3.4%), or definitive chemoradiotherapy (3.4%). Postoperative complications were found in 19 (73.1%) patients, whereas postoperative mortality was 0%. The most common complications included infection (34.6%) and respiratory complications (34.6%). Median overall survival was 20.9 months (interquartile range 11.2-42.6) from diagnosis and 17.0 months (interquartile range 6.4-35.9) from surgery in patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (interquartile range 3.1-11.3).

CONCLUSION

This study found curative treatment to be a relatively safe option, with an overall survival of 20.8 months and no postoperative mortality.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of mortality in Canada, with many patients presenting with metastatic disease. The oligometastatic state (OM-NSCLC) may be amenable to cure using aggressive local consolidative therapies. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which entails the utilization of a high dose of radiation in one or few fractions, has many benefits in this setting, including its applicability in varied patient populations to ablate lesions in varied anatomical locations. It has also been demonstrated to prolong the time to next-line systemic therapy, to reduce financial burden, to improve quality-adjusted life years, and reduce adverse events caused by these lesions. This review outlines the published phase II and III trials that have already demonstrated the utility of SBRT in OM-NSCLC, as well as the many ongoing trials aiming to further define its role, including the largest phase II/III trial to date, NRG-LU002. Overall, SBRT appears to improve outcomes when combined with a broad range of standard-of-care therapies and is generally well tolerated; however, careful patient selection is necessary to maximize benefits while minimizing harm. Ongoing trials will help define the optimal patients for SBRT and the best timing for this intervention.

Oligo-Recurrence in Lung Cancer; The Most Curable State Among Advanced Disease?

Despite the introduction of effective systemic therapies and advancements in precision medicine, recurrence or progression remains common in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For a subset of patients with more localized metastatic disease-referred to as oligometastases and oligo-recurrence-emerging evidence suggests that a multimodal approach combining systemic therapy with local ablative therapies (LATs) may offer curative potential. Oligo-recurrence is defined by the presence of a limited number of metastases and recurrences in patients with controlled primary lesions. In this review, we focus on providing a comprehensive overview of the evidence supporting the concepts of oligo-recurrence in lung cancer, which is considered one of the most curable states among advanced diseases. Although the definition remains variable and is still under discussion, retrospective studies have reported that it is not a rare condition (occurring in 18-53% of cases) and shows relatively better survival outcomes regardless of whether a local ablative therapy (LAT) is performed. However, this classification remains a topic of ongoing debate and warrants further exploration. In addition to an ongoing randomized clinical trial on oligo-recurrent NSCLC, further rigorous studies specifically addressing oligo-recurrence are needed to refine treatment strategies for this advanced yet potentially curable state. These investigations are essential for developing effective, tailored approaches to optimize outcomes for patients within this prognostically favorable subgroup.

Efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

The significance of local radiotherapy (RT) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well documented. However, the advent of immunotherapy has raised questions regarding the synergistic survival benefits or potential adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore whether a combination of RT and systematic immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can improve the survival outcomes for NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Based on collected data patients who received RT were defined as the RT group, and those who had not for any site were defined as the non-RT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to mitigate bias. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Out of 709 patients (235 in RT group and 474 in non-RT group) were included, with 213 patients per group. The median PFS of the RT group was better than that of the non-RT group (13.8 months versus 9.5 months; p < 0.0001), although no superiority in median overall survival (OS) of the RT group was observed (p = 0.715). However, among the cohort of patients with ≤3 metastases, the median OS of the RT group improved significantly (HR = 0.60, [95% CI 0.44-0.83]; p = 0.004). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 94.5% of RT group patients and in 94.9% of non-RT group patients (p = 0.792), which indicated no observable increase in AEs from RT.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the tolerability of RT when administered along with immunotherapy, suggesting its potential to positively impact the survival outcomes of NSCLC patients.

Unraveling the role of local ablative therapies for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma - A retrospective multicenter study of the Bavarian university hospitals

BACKGROUND

Local ablative therapies (LAT) are increasingly used in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), yet evidence-based standards are lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of LAT on survival of metastatic STS patients and to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, 246 STS patients with metastatic disease who underwent LAT on tumor board recommendation between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. A mixed effects model was applied to evaluate multiple survival events per patient.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) after first metastasis was 5.4 years with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 93.7, 81.7, and 53.1 %, respectively. A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of liver metastases were positively correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) after LAT (HR = 0.61, p = 0.00032 and HR = 0.52, p = 0.0081, respectively). A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of metastatic lesions in a single organ site other than lung and liver were positive prognostic factors for OS after first LAT (HR = 0.50, p = 0.028 and HR = 0.40, p = 0.026, respectively) while rare histotypes and LAT other than surgery and radiotherapy were negatively associated with OS after first LAT (HR = 2.56, p = 0.020 and HR = 3.87, p = 0.025). Additional systemic therapy was independently associated with a PFS benefit in patients ≤60 years with ≥4 metastatic lesions (for max. diameter of treated lesions ≤2 cm: HR = 0.32, p = 0.02 and >2 cm: HR = 0.20, p = 0.0011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter study conducted at six German university hospitals underlines the value of LAT in metastatic STS. The exceptionally high survival rates are likely to be associated with patient selection and treatment in specialized sarcoma centers.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers of Oligometastatic NSCLC: New Insights and Clinical Applications

This review discusses the current data on predictive and prognostic biomarkers in oligometastatic NSCLC and discusses whether biomarkers identified in other stages and widespread metastatic disease can be extrapolated to the oligometastatic disease (OMD) setting. Research is underway to explore the prognostic and predictive value of biological attributes of tumor tissue, circulating cells, the tumor microenvironment, and imaging findings as biomarkers of oligometastatic NSCLC. Biomarkers that help define true OMD and predict outcomes are needed for patient selection for oligometastatic treatment, and to avoid futile treatments in patients that will not benefit from locoregional treatment. Nevertheless, these biomarkers are still in the early stages of development and lack prospective validation in clinical trials. Furthermore, the absence of a clear definition of OMD contributes to a heterogeneous study population in which different types of OMD are mixed and treatment strategies are different. Multiple tissue-based, circulating, and imaging features are promising regarding their prognostic and predictive role in NSCLC, but data is still limited and might be biased owing to the inclusion of heterogeneous patient populations. Larger homogeneous and prospective series are needed to assess the prognostic and predictive role of these biomarkers. As obtaining tissue can be difficult and is invasive, the most promising tools for further evaluation are liquid biopsies and imaging-based biomarkers as these can also be used for longitudinal follow-up.

Multi-institutional Analysis of Metastasis-directed Therapy with or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is increasingly being used in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). However, it is currently unclear how to optimally integrate MDT with the standard of care of systemic hormonal therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term outcomes of MDT alone versus MDT and a defined course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in omCSPC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Here, a multicenter, international retrospective cohort of omCSPC as defined by conventional imaging was reported.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant progression-free survival (dPFS), and combined biochemical or distant progression-free survival (cPFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 263 patients were included, 105 with MDT + ADT and 158 with MDT alone. The majority of patients had metachronous disease (90.5%). Five-year bPFS, dPFS, and cPFS were, respectively, 24%, 41%, and 19% in patients treated with MDT + ADT and 11% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.64), 29% (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78), and 9% (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.67) in patients treated with MDT alone. On a multivariable analysis adjusting for pretreatment variables, the use of ADT was associated with improved bPFS (HR 0.43, p < 0.001), dPFS (HR 0.45, p = 0.002), and cPFS (HR 0.44, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multi-institutional report, the addition of concurrent ADT to MDT appears to improve time to prostate-specific antigen progression and distant recurrence, noting that about 10% patients had durable control with MDT alone. Ongoing phase 3 studies will help further define treatment options for omCSPC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Here, we report a large retrospective review evaluating the outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy with or without a limited course of androgen deprivation for patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. This international multi-institutional review demonstrates that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves progression-free survival. While a proportion of patients appear to have long-term disease control with MDT alone, further work in biomarker discovery is required to better identify which patients would be appropriate for de-escalated therapy.

Efficacy and Mechanism of Combining Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with about 85% of patients being diagnosed as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); and most presenting with stage IV disease initially. With the continuous advancement of treatment strategies of oncology, immunotherapy with/without chemo-immunotherapy has become the first-line treatment for patients with stage IV NSCLC. However, a proportion of patients still develop resistance to the treatment regimen and experience local progression, and primary lung lesion progression is the main progression pattern of stage IV NSCLC. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the potential of radiotherapy in anti-tumor treatment and suggest that administering local radiotherapy prior to cancer progression can prolong survival. Therefore, we consider whether adding local radiotherapy before the progression of a pulmonary lesion in stage IV NSCLC patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy would be beneficial. The present review aims to explore the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC, delving into the intricacies of their underlying mechanism.

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Seeking the Cure by Redefining Stage IV Disease?

OPINION STATEMENT

Breast cancer represents one of the most common malignancies worldwide. In early stages a combination of treatment strategies are offered with curative intent, whereas the therapeutic aim in metastatic disease is to provide the longest possible survival with an acceptable quality of life. The term "oligometastasis", first described by Hellmann and Weichselbaum in 1995, represents an intermediate state between local and systemic disease, where radical focal treatments to all metastatic lesions might have a curative potential. Due to sufficient lack of data, the proper management of oligometastatic disease remains even until today a highly unmet need. Surgery, radiotherapy or ablation (radiofrequency or cryotherapy) are among the local eradication therapies that could offer long-term outcomes in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC). The present review aims to bring the readers up to the latest data regarding the management of OMBC according to the different organs involved by setting a framework of current treatment paradigms. It also brings to the forefront debatable questions requiring multidisciplinary approach and highlights the concerns arising from dealing with this clinically and biologically unique entity in everyday clinical practice.

Phase 2 Trial of Consolidative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Oncogene-driven Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

PURPOSE

The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of advanced EGFR/ALK/ROS1-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains undefined. In EGFR-mutant NSCLC, 50-60% of recurrences on first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) occur in originally involved sites and may lead to subsequent distant failures (DFs). We sought to determine whether consolidative SBRT to residual sites reduces DF.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a single-arm, phase 2 trial of SBRT to residual sites of disease in patients with metastatic oncogene-driven NSCLC with stable or responding disease to TKI within 12 months of treatment start. The primary endpoint was DF frequency at 12 months after SBRT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 57.1 months. The trial enrolled 27 of 30 planned patients between 2015 and 2021, stopping early caused by slow accrual. Most (n = 22) had EGFR driver mutations. The majority (59.5%) were treated with later-generation TKIs. The median time from TKI start to SBRT was 6.4 months. Twenty-five patients (92.6%) received SBRT to the residual lung primary only. The 12-month DF rate was 19% (95% CI, 7%-36%). Median progression-free survival from SBRT was 15.0 months (95% CI, 8.6-46.7). The 2-year local failure rate of irradiated sites was 11% (95% CI, 3%-27%). Two-year and median overall survival were 88% (95% CI, 68%-96%) and 59.6 months (95% CI, 42.3-NR), respectively. There were no grade ≥3 adverse events related to SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with first-line TKIs, consolidative SBRT was associated with improvement in distant disease control compared with historical controls, supporting ongoing randomized trials.

Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (EXTEND): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

The EXTEND trial tested the hypothesis that adding comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to chemotherapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone among patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

EXTEND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03599765) is a multicenter, phase II basket trial randomly assigning patients with ≤five metastases 1:1 to MDT plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy. Disease progression was defined by radiologic criteria (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. The primary end point was PFS in the per-protocol population, evaluated after all patients achieved at least 6 months of follow-up. Exploratory end points included systemic immune response measures.

RESULTS

Between March 19, 2019, and February 13, 2023, 41 patients were randomly assigned and 40 were eligible for the primary analysis of PFS (19 patients in the MDT arm; 21 patients in the control arm). At a median follow-up time of 17 months, the median PFS time was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 14.0) in the MDT arm versus 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.1) in the control arm. PFS was significantly improved by the addition of MDT to systemic therapy (P = .030 for stratified log-rank test) with a hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.94). No grade ≥3 or greater adverse events related to MDT were observed. Systemic immune activation events were associated with MDT and correlated with improved PFS.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the addition of MDT to systemic therapy for patients with oligometastatic PDAC. Induction of systemic immunity is a possible mechanism of benefit. These results warrant confirmatory trials to refine treatment strategy and provide external validation.

Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p < 0.05) with no statistical difference between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in survival between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups. In ES-SCLC, the number of metastases may be a more predictive factor for prognosis than the number of metastatic organs.

Time to Next Treatment Following Sub-Ablative Progression Directed Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

We aimed to evaluate whether progression-directed radiation therapy (PDRT) can prolong the initiation of a subsequent systemic therapy regimen in a cohort of patients with oligoprogressive NSCLC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on NSCLC patients who underwent PDRT for extracranial oligoprogressive NSCLC, defined as limited (up to five) progressing lesions following initial complete, partial, or stable response to systemic therapy according to REC1ST 1.1 and/or PERCIST 1.0 criteria. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed to identify factors influencing time to next treatment (TTNT), which was considered the primary endpoint. Forty patients were analyzed. First, second, and ≥3 lines of systemic therapy were administered in 22 (58.2%), 14 (27.2%), and 4 (14.6%) cases, respectively. The median total dose was 36 Gy (range: 12-60) in five fractions (1-10), with a median biological effective dose for tumor control (BED10) of 52 Gy (26.4-151.2). After a median follow-up of 11 months (2-50), PDRT delayed further systemic therapy in 32 (80.0%) treatments. Median TTNT was not reached at 8 months (1-47) with a one-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of 81.4% (95% CI: 75.0% to 87.8%). No >grade 3 adverse event was observed. On multivariate analysis, patients with ≥3 lines of systemic therapy and/or with larger CTV volumes did not benefit from PDRT. Despite the use of sub-ablative doses, our findings show that PDRT represents an effective, safe, and viable option for oligoprogressive NSCLC. Patients irradiated early during their systemic treatment course, with a low volume of disease and nonmetastatic oligoprogression, could derive substantial benefits from PDRT.

Combination Immunotherapy With Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of Evidence

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy plays a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with all stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the standard of care in these patients. The use of ICIs is increasingly utilized in the definitive setting as an adjunct to chemoradiotherapy or surgery and remains a vital component in the treatment of metastatic disease. Despite improvements in patient survival, the use of immunotherapy as monotherapy has shown limited overall response rates with susceptibility to resistance. Radiotherapy has been identified as a viable option to enhance the response rate to ICI and improve outcomes in NSCLC.

METHODS

We queried the English PubMed database utilizing variably combined search items including "radiation," "chemoradiation," "immune checkpoint," "immunotherapy," "stereotactic body radiotherapy," and "non-small-cell lung". We additionally searched various acceptable alternative terms for similar keywords such as "radiotherapy" in place of "radiation." These results were subsequently curated for relevance and impact on current treatment paradigms.

RESULTS

In this review, we discuss preclinical and clinical studies relating to combinatorial use of immunotherapy and radiation in NSCLC. These studies are presented in the context of early-stage, operable stage III, unresectable stage III, and metastatic disease. The majority of the data illustrate promising results regarding the additive or synergistic effects of radiation and immunotherapy with a suggestion that the timing of these treatment modalities is crucial to optimizing outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While there is now evidence regarding the favorable interplay between radiation and immunotherapy in NSCLC, there remain multiple unanswered questions which are expected to be addressed in ongoing clinical trials.

ACROPath Oligometastases: The American College of Radiation Oncology Clinical Pathway

Radiation oncology is among the most data-driven specialties in medicine. Recently, a wealth of peer-reviewed data has been published supporting the treatment of oligometastatic malignancies, demonstrating improved survival with metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), when combined with appropriate patient selection and treatment. However, there are currently few, if any, established guidelines that synthesize the abundance of data specific to radiotherapy into a single, easily accessed resource for clinicians. ACROPath® is a major initiative of the American College of Radiation Oncology (ACRO) that aims to present aggregated clinical pathway data in a highly usable format that is readily accessible to clinicians at the point of care in real time. The oligometastases pathway is the first published algorithm in this collection, with additional pathways anticipated in future publications. Clinical radiation oncologists with expertise in the treatment and management of oligometastatic disease were recruited from across ACRO's diverse membership, including both academic and private practice physicians, to ensure a broad-based experience and insight. Individual participants were assigned subsections of the pathway for guideline development, and then, each subsection was presented to the full group for evaluation and consensus development based on published data. Rather than presenting an unstructured set of treatment options, as is common in other treatment guidelines, this initiative aimed to categorize appropriate treatments based on published clinical evidence in a hierarchy further ranked by efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Based on these strata, treatment recommendations were collated and grouped into three rank categories (gold, silver, or bronze) to denote the degree of applicability. The team assembled an interactive document that will eventually be available online, and it is summarized in detail here. Recommendations are grouped both by the anatomic site of metastasis and by the primary tumor type, recognizing that original histology might impact the treatment differently in different anatomic locations. After a review of available published clinical evidence, the committee reached a consensus on all recommendations presented, categorizing each option as gold, silver, or bronze to guide clinicians appropriately. This first iteration of ACROPath® Oligometastases represents one of the few comprehensive clinical decision support tools available for managing patients with limited metastatic disease. It presents available data in a highly accessible, easily used reference, which will be formally reviewed and updated by the committee as frequently as emerging data requires, likely at six- to 12-month intervals.

The Whole Picture of First-Line Osimertinib for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC: Real-World Efficacy, Safety, Progression Pattern, and Posttreatment Therapy (Reiwa Study)

Introduction

Osimertinib is used as the first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, its efficacy and safety in clinical practice remain to be fully elucidated and the pattern of progression and the optimal subsequent treatment after osimertinib remains unclear.

Methods

This was a multicenter prospective observational study. EGFR mutation-positive patients with NSCLC who started first-line osimertinib from September 2018 to August 2020 were enrolled and followed up until August 2022.

Results

A total of 583 patients received osimertinib. The median progression-free and overall survival were 20.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6-21.7) months and 41.0 (95% CI: 37.1-44.1) months, respectively. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed in 136 patients (23.3%). Progression patterns were categorized as central nervous system only, oligo-progression, and multiple organs on the basis of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-progressive disease and occurred in 37 (10.8%), 156 (45.4%), and 151 patients (43.9%). The patient's condition on progression was asymptomatic in 195 patients (56.7%). Osimertinib was continued in 163 patients (47.4%) after confirming progression. In clinically stable population with progressive disease (n = 247), survival after progression was 13.3 (95% CI: 10.9-16.4) months for those who continued osimertinib beyond progressive disease (n = 124), and 24.1 (95% CI: 17.7-34.0) months for those who discontinued osimertinib (n = 123) (hazard ratio = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.38-2.91, p = 0.0002). Platinum plus pemetrexed had the best overall survival benefits after osimertinib.

Conclusions

First-line osimertinib was found to have good effectiveness comparable to that reported in pivotal studies. Nevertheless, osimertinib should be discontinued among those who develop progression.

Trial registration number

UMIN000038683.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligoprogressive solid tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review evidence and pool outcomes to assess the effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients treated for oligoprogressive metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A search was conducted January 2010 to January 2023 in five bibliographic databases for studies of patients with oligoprogressive disease treated with SABR to all lesions. Clinical outcomes included PFS (progression-free survival), OS (overall survival) and CST (change in systemic therapy). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Binary random effects model was used for pooled analyses.

RESULTS

12,366 titles/abstracts screened, of which 25 met eligibility criteria and were included the review. All studies were published after 2017 with approximately 80% of the publications in 2021 and 2022. The primary tumour was prostate (n=8, 32%), kidney (n=6, 24%), colorectal (n=4, 16%) followed by breast (n=3, 12%), lung (n=2, 8%) and mixed (n=3, 12%). At 1 year, the pooled PFS was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-53%, I2=91%); 53% (95% CI: 45-60%, I2=46%) in prostate, 49% (95% CI: 33-65%, I2=88%) in kidney, 62% (95% CI: 11-113%, I2=96%) in lung, 13% (95% CI: 3-24%, I2=39%) in breast and 30% (95% CI: 19-41%, I2=59%) in mixed.

DISCUSSION

There has been a surge in publications describing the use of SABR in oligoprogressive tumours. Published studies are mostly retrospective reported in prostate and kidney cancers, with limited evidence in other sites. Universal guidelines are recommended to ensure consistency in reporting and comparability of future studies.

A new proposal of simplified classification of non-small cell lung cancer oligometastases for easy applicability through systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation

INTRODUCTION

Oligometastasis (OM) exhibits wide range of prognosis, which necessitates appropriate classification for optimal therapeutic decision-making. Complementing the ESTRO-EORTC classification which lacked prognostic differentiation and was rather complex, we propose a new and simpler classification based on systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation.

METHOD

The databases were searched up to April 2024. Inclusion criteria were (1) ≥ 10 Non-small cell lung cancer OM patients, (2) local ablative treatment (LAT) versus control (systemic/supportive treatment), (3) reporting progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), respectively. A simpler classification was proposed through systematic reviews evaluating outcomes based on OM characteristics. According to this new classification, the LAT benefit and pooled 2-year OS and 1-year PFS percentiles were validated through meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In overall meta-analysis, LAT was correlated with enhanced 1-year PFS (odds ratio (OR):3.487, p < 0.001) and 2-year OS (OR:2.984, p < 0.001), respectively. According to simplified classification, LAT benefit of 1-year PFS was differentiated with ORs of 5.631 (p < 0.001), 3.484 (p < 0.001), and 1.702 (p = 0.067) for Synchronous (Syn), OPS (Oligopersistence), and OPR (Oligoprogression/recurrence) subgroups, respectively. Inter-subgroup comparisons showed significant differences as well. For 2-year OS, ORs of LAT benefit were 3.366 (p < 0.001), 3.355 (p < 0.001), and 1.821 (p = 0.127) in Syn, OPS, and OPR subgroups, respectively; LAT benefit was significant in Syn and OPS, but not significant in OPR. In pooled percentile comparison, 1-year pooled PFS was significantly lower in the OPR group than others, both in the LAT and control arms.

CONCLUSION

Based on a systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation, we developed a simpler three-step OM classification: Syn, OPS, and OPR. We would propose this new classification that is simpler and more applicable to clinical decisions than the currently available classification.

Emerging Indications for Interventional Oncology: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Metastatic Non-cervical Lymph Node Disease

INTRODUCTION

Lymphatic node metastatic disease encompasses a distinct oncological entity which has been associated with poor prognosis. Image-guided thermal ablation has recently been proposed as a safe and alternative treatment for these lesions. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the pooled safety and efficacy of thermal ablation techniques for the treatment of oligometastatic non-cervical lymph nodal disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic search of the three major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) from inception to 30 December 2023 was conducted according to the PRISMA Guidelines. Observational studies reporting technical success, complications and oncologic outcomes were included. Meta- analysis was performed by estimating the pooled incidence rates and risk ratios by fitting random-effect models. Overall, 8 studies were included, comprising of 225 patients and 305 ablated LNMs and a median follow-up of 12 months. The combined data analysis showed that technical success after thermal ablation was 98% (CI: 95%-99%), major complication rate was 1% (CI: 95%-99%), pooled overall response rate was 72% (CI: 54%-87%), local tumor progression rate was 18% (CI: 8%-33%) and disease-free survival rate was 68% (CI: 51%-81%). No difference between radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation was found for every outcome during subgroup analysis. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation (with either radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) is safe and effective for the treatment of oligometastatic LMN disease, however further studies to confirm these findings are still needed.

Local Ablative Therapy Combined With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Synchronous Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Recursive Partitioning Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of local ablative therapy (LAT) combined with pembrolizumab in patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify patients who would most benefit from LAT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified patients who received diagnosis of synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC (≤5 metastatic lesions and ≤3 organs involved) and were treated with first-line pembrolizumab between January 2017 and December 2022. Patients who underwent LAT, including surgery or radiation therapy at all disease sites, were compared with those who did not undergo LAT. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) model was developed using prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among the 258 patients included, 78 received LAT with pembrolizumab, and 180 received pembrolizumab alone. The median follow-up duration was 15.5 months (range, 3.0-71.2 months). In the entire cohort, LAT was independently associated with significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; P = .015) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.61; P = .020). In the propensity score-matched cohort (N = 74 in each group), the median PFS was 19.9 months and 9.6 months, respectively (P = .003), and the median OS was 42.2 months and 20.5 months, respectively (P = .045), for the LAT and non-LAT groups. Based on the RPA model, incorporating the number of metastatic lesions, performance status, and programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression level, patients were stratified into 3 risk groups with distinct PFS. LAT significantly improved PFS and OS in the low- and intermediate-risk groups; however, no difference was observed in the high-risk group. LAT was more effective as a consolidative treatment after pembrolizumab initiation than as an upfront therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LAT combined with pembrolizumab was associated with higher PFS and OS compared with pembrolizumab alone in selected patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC. The RPA model could serve as a valuable clinical tool for identifying appropriate patients for LAT.

Adding Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Standard-of-Care Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer (EXTEND): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

Prior evidence suggests a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to standard-of-care (SOC) systemic therapy for patients with some oligometastatic solid tumors. Randomized trials testing this hypothesis in breast cancer have yet to be published. We sought to determine whether adding MDT to SOC systemic therapy improves PFS in oligometastatic breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

External Beam Radiation to Eliminate Nominal Metastatic Disease is a multicenter phase 2 randomized basket trial testing the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy in patients with ≤5 metastases (NCT03599765). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to MDT (definitive local treatment to all sites of disease, plus SOC systemic therapy) or to SOC systemic therapy-only. Primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, and time to the appearance of new metastases. Exploratory analyses included quality of life and systemic immune response measures.

RESULTS

From September 2018 through July 2022, 22 and 21 patients were randomly assigned to the MDT and no-MDT arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, PFS was not improved with the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy (median PFS 15.6 months MDT vs 24.9 months no-MDT [hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.34-2.48; P = .86]). Similarly, MDT did not improve overall survival, time to subsequent line of systemic therapy, or time to the appearance of new metastases (all P > .05). No significant differences were found in quality of life measures, systemic T-cell activation, or T-cell stimulatory cytokine concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, the addition of MDT to SOC systemic therapy did not improve PFS. These findings suggest that MDT may have no systemic benefit in otherwise unselected patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, although this trial was limited by a heterogeneous and small sample size and overperformance of both treatment arms.

Influence of brain metastases on the classification, treatment, and outcome of patients with extracranial oligometastasis: a single-center cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

Increasing evidence suggests that a subgroup of patients with oligometastatic cancer might achieve a prolonged disease-free survival through local therapy for all active cancer lesions. Our aims are to investigate the impact of brain metastases on the classification, treatment, and outcome in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed a total of 7,000 oncological positron emission tomography scans to identify patients with extracranial oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤ 5 intra- or extra-cranial metastases). Concurrent magnetic resonance imaging brain was assessed to quantify intracranial tumor burden. We investigated the impact of brain metastases on oligometastatic disease state, therapeutic approaches, and outcome. Predictors for transitioning from oligo- to polymetastatic states were evaluated using regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients with extracranial oligometastases and simultaneous brain metastases were identified, primarily originating from skin or lung/pleura cancers (90%, n = 96). Brain metastases caused a transition from an extracranial oligometastatic to a whole-body polymetastatic state in 45% (n = 48) of patients. While oligometastatic patients received systemic therapy (55% vs. 35%) more frequently and radiotherapy for brain metastases was more often prescribed to polymetastatic patients (44% vs. 26%), the therapeutic approach did not differ systematically between both sub-groups. The oligometastatic sub-group had a median overall survival of 28 months compared to 10 months in the polymetastatic sub-group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with brain metastases, a low total tumor burden with an oligometastatic disease state remained a significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Presence of brain metastases should therefore not serve as exclusion criterion for clinical trials in the field of oligometastatic disease. Moreover, it underscores the importance of considering a multimodality treatment strategy in oligometastatic cancer patients.

Sharing the Burden: The Case for Definitive Local Therapy in Place of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Patients With a Low-Volume Burden of Metastatic Disease

COMMENTARY

Sharing the burden of low-volume metastatic cancer between ICB and local treatments.

Palliative radiotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with painful hepatic cancer (CCTG HE1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Palliative treatment options for painful hepatic cancer can be restricted due to patients eventually becoming refractory to standard treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiotherapy improves hepatic pain from cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (CCTG HE1) done in nine cancer centres across Canada, we included patients aged 18 years or older with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, who were refractory to standard treatment, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3, with life expectancy of more than 3 months, and pain or discomfort at its worst in the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) of at least 4 out of 10, which was stable for up to 7 days before randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a minimisation method after stratification by centre and type of cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma vs liver metastases), to single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) to the liver with 8 mg ondansetron (or equivalent) orally and 4 mg dexamethasone orally given 1-2 h before radiotherapy plus best supportive care (including non-opioid or opioid analgesia, or dexamethasone, or a combination of these) or best supportive care alone. The primary endpoint was improvement in patient-reported liver cancer pain or discomfort of at least 2 points on worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month after randomisation. All patients with both baseline and 1-month assessments were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511522, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between July 25, 2015, and June 2, 2022, 66 patients were screened and randomly assigned to radiotherapy plus best supportive care (n=33) or best supportive care (n=33). Median age was 65 years (IQR 57-72), 37 (56%) of 66 patients were male, 29 (44%) were female, 43 (65%) had liver metastases, and 23 (35%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (data on race and ethnicity were not collected). As of data cutoff (Sept 8, 2022), median follow-up was 3·2 months (95% CI 3·0-3·4). 24 (73%) of 33 in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group and 18 (55%) of 33 in the best supportive care only group completed baseline and 1-month assessments. An improvement in hepatic pain of at least 2 points in worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month was seen in 16 (67%) of 24 patients in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group versus four (22%) of 18 patients in the best supportive care group (p=0·0042). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events within 1 month after randomisation were abdominal pain (three [9%] of 33 in the radiotherapy group vs one [3%] of 33 in best supportive care group) and ascites (two [6%] vs one [3%]). No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Single-fraction radiotherapy plus best supportive care improved pain compared with best supportive care alone in patients with liver cancer, and could be considered a standard palliative treatment.

FUNDING

Canadian Cancer Society.

Acute toxicity in patients with oligometastatic cancer following metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy: An interim analysis of the E2-RADIatE OligoCare cohort

AIM

To evaluate acute toxicity at 6 months after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic cancer within the OligoCare cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

OligoCare is a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational study that aims to report prospective real-world data of patients with oligometastases from solid cancer treated with SBRT (NCT03818503). Primary tumor included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and prostate cancer (PC). This analysis addresses a secondary endpoint of the trial, acute toxicity within 6 months after SBRT.

RESULTS

Out of 1,597registered patients, 1'468 patients were evaluated for acute toxicity. Globally, 290 (20 %) had NSCLC primary disease, 227 (16 %) had BC, 293 (20 %) had CRC, and 658 (45 %) had PC. Concomitant systemic treatment was administered in 527 (35.9 %) patients. According to the EORTC/ESTRO oligometastatic disease (OMD) classification, 828 (56 %) patients had de novo OMD, 464 (32 %) repeat OMD, and 176 (12 %) induced OMD. Acute grade ≥ 3 SBRT related adverse events were reported in 8 (0.5 %) patients, including 2 (0.1 %) fatal AEs. In particular, 6 (0.4 %) grade 3 events were: 1 empyema, 1 pneumonia, 1 radiation pneumonitis, 1 radiation skin injury, 1 decreased appetite, and 1 bone pain. Among those 2 occurred in NSCLC patients, 2 in BC patients, and 1 in CRC and PC patients each. The two (0.1 %) grade 5 toxicity were represented by: pneumonitis and cerebral hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

OligoCare is the largest prospective registry cohort on oligometastatic disease. Acute toxicity within 6 months was low, confirming the safety of SBRT in the treatment of oligometastases.

Strategies and influencing factors for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the primary treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, significantly enhancing patient prognosis. Despite the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs, monotherapy faces challenges such as variability among individuals and early drug resistance. This article aims to explore the treatment strategies and influencing factors for advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, optimize treatment plans, and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We undertook a comprehensive, narrative review of the latest literature to define the current application and progress of EGFR-TKIs in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

Key Content and Findings

The efficacy and promise of EGFR-TKIs, both as monotherapy and combined with other agents, for treating patients with advanced NSCLC are outlined. The study delves into the mechanisms of resistance and the ongoing development of EGFR-TKIs. Various factors influencing the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-TKIs are also examined.

Conclusions

EGFR-TKIs alone improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. Combined with other agents, some regimens have shown improved benefits in overcoming drug resistance and prolonging patient survival. It is imperative to focus on developing novel EGFR-TKIs and investigate innovative combination therapies to maximize patient benefit.

Non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequent cancer types and is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The management of NSCLC has improved considerably, especially in the past 10 years. The systematic screening of populations at risk with low-dose CT, the implementation of novel surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques and a deeper biological understanding of NSCLC that has led to innovative systemic treatment options have improved the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. In non-metastatic NSCLC, the combination of various perioperative strategies and adjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced disease seem to enhance cure rates. In metastatic NSCLC, the implementation of novel drugs might prolong disease control together with preserving quality of life. The further development of predictive clinical and genetic markers will be essential for the next steps in individualized treatment concepts.

Feasibility of Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Targeting Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) is a novel radiation delivery approach utilizing fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) activity on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging performed in real-time to track and direct RT. Our institution recently acquired the RefleXion X1 BgRT system and sought to assess the feasibility of targeting metastatic sites in various organs, including the liver. However, in order for BgRT to function appropriate, adequate contrast in FDG activity between the tumor and the background tissue, referred to as the normalized SUV (NSUV), is necessary for optimal functioning of BgRT.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 50 lung adenocarcinoma patients with liver metastases. The following variables were collected: SUVmax and SUVmean for each liver metastasis, SUVmean and SUVmax at 5 and 10 mm radially from the lesion, and NSUV at 5 mm and 10 mm (SUVmax of the liver metastasis divided by SUV mean at 5 mm at 10 mm respectively).

RESULTS

82 measurable liver metastases were included in the final analysis. The average SUVbackground of liver was 2.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-2.35); average SUVmean for liver metastases was 5.31 (95% CI 4.87-5.75), and average SUVmax of liver metastases was 9.19 (95% CI 7.59-10.78). The average SUVmean at 5 mm and 10 mm radially from each lesion were 3.08 (95% CI 3.00-2.16) and 2.60 (95% CI 2.52-2.68), respectively. The mean NSUV at 5 mm and 10 mm were 3.13 (95% CI 2.53-3.73) and 3.69 (95% CI 3.00-4.41) respectively. Furthermore, 90% of lesions had NSUV greater than 1.45 at 5 mm and greater than 1.77 at 10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to comprehensively characterize FDG contrast between the liver tumor and background, referred to as NSUV. Due to the high background SUV normally found in the liver, this work will be valuable for guiding optimization of BgRT for treating liver metastases in the future using the RefleXion® X1 and potentially other similar BgRT platforms.

Genomic signature for oligometastatic disease in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Purpose/objectives

Biomarkers for extracranial oligometastatic disease remain elusive and few studies have attempted to correlate genomic data to the presence of true oligometastatic disease.

Methods

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases were identified in our departmental database. Electronic medical records were used to identify patients for whom liquid biopsy-based comprehensive genomic profiling (Guardant Health) was available. Extracranial oligometastatic disease was defined as patients having ≤5 non-brain metastases without diffuse involvement of a single organ. Widespread disease was any spread beyond oligometastatic. Fisher's exact tests were used to screen for mutations statistically associated (p<0.1) with either oligometastatic or widespread extracranial disease. A risk score for the likelihood of oligometastatic disease was generated and correlated to the likelihood of having oligometastatic disease vs widespread disease. For oligometastatic patients, a competing risk analysis was done to assess for cumulative incidence of oligometastatic progression. Cox regression was used to determine association between oligometastatic risk score and oligoprogression.

Results

130 patients met study criteria and were included in the analysis. 51 patients (39%) had extracranial oligometastatic disease. Genetic mutations included in the Guardant panel that were associated (p<0.1) with the presence of oligometastatic disease included ATM, JAK2, MAP2K2, and NTRK1, while ARID1A and CCNE1 were associated with widespread disease. Patients with a positive, neutral and negative risk score for oligometastatic disease had a 78%, 41% and 11.5% likelihood of having oligometastatic disease, respectively (p<0.0001). Overall survival for patients with positive, neutral and negative risk scores for oligometastatic disease was 86% vs 82% vs 64% at 6 months (p=0.2). Oligometastatic risk score was significantly associated with the likelihood of oligoprogression based on the Wald chi-square test. Patients with positive, neutral and negative risk scores for oligometastatic disease had a cumulative incidence of oligometastatic progression of 77% vs 35% vs 33% at 6 months (p=0.03).

Conclusions

Elucidation of a genomic signature for extracranial oligometastatic disease derived from non-invasive liquid biopsy appears feasible for NSCLC patients. Patients with this signature exhibited higher rates of early oligoprogression. External validation could lead to a biomarker that has the potential to direct local therapies in oligometastatic patients.

Modern era systemic therapies: Expanding concepts of cure in early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Cure of cancer is a sensitive and multidimensional concept that is challenging to define, difficult to assert at the individual patient level, and often surrounded by controversy. The notion of cure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed and continues to evolve with improvements in diagnosis and treatment. Targeted and immune therapies have recently entered the treatment landscape of stage I-III NSCLC. While some initial pivotal trials of such agents failed to improve survival, recently approved epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (in EGFR-mutated NSCLC) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown delays in disease recurrence or progression and unprecedented survival gains compared to previous standards of care. Additional data is now emerging supporting the benefit of treatment strategies based on alternation-matched targeting (anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] inhibition in ALK-altered disease) and immune checkpoint inhibition in stage I-III NSCLC. Similar to previous developments in the treatment of early and locally advanced NSCLC, it is expected that statistically significant and clinically meaningful trial-level benefits will translate into real-world benefits, including improvements in cure measures. Parallel advances in molecular testing (e.g., circulating tumor DNA analyses) are also allowing for a deeper and more comprehensive characterization of disease status and treatment response. Given the impact that curative-intent treatments have on survival, it is critical that various stakeholders, including clinicians and patients, are aware of new opportunities to pursue cure in stage I-III NSCLC.

Outcomes with non-small cell lung cancer and brain-only metastasis

Background

We evaluated outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who presented with brain-only metastatic (BOM) disease overall and by EGFR/ALK mutation status.

Methods

We analyzed clinico-demographic, treatment and survival data for all NSCLC patients who presented to our center between 2014 and 2016 with BOM as their first presentation of metastatic disease. Differences in overall survival (OS) were evaluated using log-rank tests for NSCLC wildtype (NSCLCwt) versus NSCLC with an ALK-rearrangement/EGFR-mutation (NSCLCmut+).

Results

Of 109 patients with BOM, median age was 68 years; 51 % were female; 69 % Caucasian; 76 % ever-smoker; 76 % adenocarcinoma; and 25 % NSCLCmut+. While 41 patients (38 %) had subsequent brain-only progressive disease (PD), 22 (20 %) developed extracranial metastases. A higher proportion of NSCLCmut+ (vs -wt) subsequently progressed outside the brain (37 % vs 15 %, p = 0.03). Median time-to-first-extracranial-metastases was 8.5 (NSCLCmut+) vs 21.0 months (NSCLCwt; p = 0.23).With 17.7 months median follow-up, median-OS was 15.9 months [95%CI: 11.5-21.3; all patients]; 12.3 [7.4-18.4; NSCLCwt] and 38.9 [21.3-not reached (NR); NSCLCmut+] (p = 0.09). In 33 of 80 patients with de novo BOM, the primary tumor was treated with surgery or radiotherapy. In patients with NSCLCwt, there was no OS benefit associated with local lung tumor treatment (p = 0.68), whereas in NSCLCmut + pts, local lung tumor treatment correlated with greater OS (median-OS NR vs 21.5 months; p = 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with NSCLCwt with BOM, we observed a -predominant pattern of brain-only secondary progression, however patients with NSCLCmut + more often progressed extracranially. In patients with NSCLCmut+ and BOM, definitive primary tumor treatment correlated with improved survival.

Focal therapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can present with oligometastatic disease and/or develop oligoprogression following systemic therapy. Cytoreductive and focal metastasis-directed therapy options include resection, stereotactic ablative radiation and thermal ablation. Aggressive focal therapy may allow delay in initiation of or modification to systemic therapy and improve clinical outcomes. In this narrative review we synthesize current practice guidelines and prospective data on focal therapy management options and highlight future research. Patient selection and the choice of focal treatment techniques are controversial due to limited and heterogeneous data and patients may benefit from multidisciplinary evaluation. Prospective comparative trials with clearly defined inclusion criteria and relevant end points are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of different approaches.