1
|
Patel VM, Elias R, Asokan A, Sharma A, Christie A, Pedrosa I, Chiu H, Reznik S, Hannan R, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J. Life-threatening hemoptysis in patients with metastatic kidney cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:497-506. [PMID: 37045713 PMCID: PMC10510952 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Hemoptysis is a complication of intrathoracic tumors, both primary and metastatic, and the risk may be increased by procedural interventions as well as Stereotactic Ablative Radiation (SAbR). The risk of hemoptysis with SAbR for lung cancer is well characterized, but there is a paucity of data about intrathoracic metastases. Here, we sought to evaluate the incidence of life-threatening/fatal hemoptysis (LTH) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) chest metastases with a focus on SAbR. We systematically evaluated patients with RCC at UT Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) Kidney Cancer Program (KCP) from July 2005 to March 2020. We queried Kidney Cancer Explorer (KCE), a data portal with clinical, pathological, and experimental genomic data. Patients were included in the study based on mention of "hemoptysis" in clinical documentation, if they had a previous bronchoscopy, or had undergone SAbR to any site within the chest. Two hundred and thirty four patients met query criteria and their records were individually reviewed. We identified 10 patients who developed LTH. Of these, 4 had LTH as an immediate procedural complication whilst the remaining 6 had prior SAbR to ultra-central (UC; abutting the central bronchial tree) metastases. These 6 patients had a total of 10 lung lesions irradiated (UC, 8; central 1, peripheral 1), with a median total cumulative SAbR dose of 38 Gray (Gy/ lesion) (range: 25-50 Gy). Other risk factors included intrathoracic disease progression (n = 4, 67%), concurrent anticoagulant therapy (n = 1, 17%) and concurrent systemic therapy (n = 4, 67%). Median time to LTH from first SAbR was 26 months (range: 8-61 months). Considering that 130 patients received SAbR to a chest lesion during the study period, the overall incidence of LTH following SAbR was 4.6% (6/130). The patient population that received SAbR (n = 130) was at particularly high risk for complications, with 67 (52%) having two or more chest metastaes treated, and 29 (22%) receiving SAbR to three or more lesions. Overall, the risk of LTH following SAbR to a central or UC lesion was 10.5% (6/57). In conclusion, SAbR of RCC metastases located near the central bronchial tree may increase the risk of LTH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viral M Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Roy Elias
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Annapoorani Asokan
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Akanksha Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Biostatistics Shared Resource, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hsienchang Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Scott Reznik
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James Brugarolas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kraynak J, Marciscano AE. Image-guided radiation therapy of tumors in preclinical models. Methods Cell Biol 2023; 180:1-13. [PMID: 37890924 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) platforms for preclinical research represent an important advance for radiation research. IGRT-based platforms more accurately model the delivery of therapeutic ionizing radiation as delivered in clinical practice which permits more translationally and clinically relevant radiation biology research. Fundamentally, IGRT allows for precise delivery of ionizing radiation in order to (1) ensure that the tumor and/or target of interest is adequately covered by the prescribed radiation dose, and (2) to minimize the radiation dose delivered to adjacent nontargeted or normal tissues. Here, we describe the techniques and outline a general workflow employed for IGRT in preclinical in vivo tumor models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Kraynak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Ariel E Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cao L, Linden PA, Biswas T, Worrell SG, Sinopoli JN, Miller ME, Shenk R, Montero AJ, Towe CW. Modeling the COVID Pandemic: Do Delays in Surgery Justify Using Stereotactic Radiation to Treat Low-Risk Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? J Surg Res 2023; 283:532-539. [PMID: 36436290 PMCID: PMC9686123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It was suggested that stereotactic radiation (SBRT) is an "alternative if no surgical capacity is available" for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to compare the oncologic outcomes of delayed surgical resection and early SBRT among operable patients with early stage lung cancer. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with cT1aN0M0 NSCLC who underwent surgery or SBRT (2010-2016) with no comorbidity. Patients with any comorbidities or age >80 were excluded. The outcome of interest was overall survival. Delays in surgical care were modeled using different times from diagnosis to surgery. A 1:1 propensity match was performed and survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Of 6720 healthy cT1aN0M0 NSCLC patients, 6008 (89.4%) received surgery and 712 (10.6%) received SBRT. Among surgery patients, time to surgery >30 d was associated with inferior survival (HR > 1.4, P ≤ 0.013) compared with patients receiving surgery ≤14 d. Relative to SBRT, surgery demonstrated superior survival at all time points evaluated: 0-30 d, 31-60 d, 61-90 d, and >90 d (all P < 0.001). Among a propensity-matched cohort of 256 pairs of patients, delayed surgery (>90 d) remained association with better overall survival relative to early SBRT (5-year survival 76.9% versus 32.3%, HR = 0.266, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although longer time to surgery is associated with inferior survival among surgery patients, delayed surgery is superior to early SBRT. Surgical resection should remain the standard of care to treat operable early stage lung cancer despite delays imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifen Cao
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Philip A. Linden
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tithi Biswas
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stephanie G. Worrell
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jillian N. Sinopoli
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Megan E. Miller
- University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert Shenk
- University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alberto J. Montero
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christopher W. Towe
- Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness (UH-RISES), Cleveland, Ohio,Corresponding author. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-5011. Tel.: +1 216 844 0405
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tomita N, Ishiyama H, Makita C, Ohshima Y, Nagai A, Baba F, Kuno M, Otsuka S, Kondo T, Sugie C, Kawai T, Takaoka T, Okazaki D, Torii A, Niwa M, Kita N, Takano S, Kawakami S, Matsuo M, Kumano T, Ito M, Adachi S, Abe S, Murao T, Hiwatashi A. Daily irradiation versus irradiation at two- to three-day intervals in stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with 1-5 brain metastases: study protocol for a multicenter open-label randomized phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1259. [PMID: 36471274 PMCID: PMC9720969 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10371-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiobiological daily changes within tumors are considered to be quite different between stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (e.g., 50 Gy in 4 fractions) and conventional radiotherapy (e.g., 60 Gy in 30 fractions). We aim to assess the optimal interval of irradiation in SRT and compare outcomes of daily irradiation with irradiation at two- to three-day intervals in SRT for patients with one to five brain metastases (BM). METHODS This study is conducted as a multicenter open-label randomized phase II trial. Patients aged 20 or older with one to five BM, less than 3.0 cm diameter, and Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70 are eligible. A total of 70 eligible patients will be enrolled. After stratifying by the number of BMs (1, 2 vs. 3-5) and diameter of the largest tumor (< 2 cm vs. ≥ 2 cm), we randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive daily irradiation (Arm 1), or irradiation at two- to three-day intervals (Arm 2). Both arms are performed with total dose of 27-30 Gy in 3 fractions. The primary endpoint is an intracranial local control rate, defined as intracranial local control at initially treated sites. We use a randomized phase II screening design with a two-sided α of 0∙20. The phase II trial is positive with p < 0.20. All analyses are intention to treat. This study is registered with the UMIN-clinical trials registry, number UMIN000048728. DISCUSSION This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SRT interval on local control, survival, and toxicity for patients with 1-5 BM. The trial is ongoing and is recruiting now. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN000048728. Date of registration: August 23, 2022. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000055515 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsuo Tomita
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ishiyama
- grid.410786.c0000 0000 9206 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0329 Japan
| | - Chiyoko Makita
- grid.411704.7Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan
| | - Yukihiko Ohshima
- grid.411234.10000 0001 0727 1557Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195 Japan
| | - Aiko Nagai
- grid.260433.00000 0001 0728 1069Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8547 Japan
| | - Fumiya Baba
- grid.260433.00000 0001 0728 1069Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, 1-1-1 Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508 Japan
| | - Mayu Kuno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, 2-2-22 Bunkyo, Ichinomiya, Aichi 491-8558 Japan
| | - Shinya Otsuka
- grid.413724.70000 0004 0378 6598Department of Radiation Oncology, Okazaki City Hospital, 3-1 Goshoai, Koryuji-cho, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8553 Japan
| | - Takuhito Kondo
- grid.416417.10000 0004 0569 6780Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital, 4-66 Syonen-cho, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 454-8502 Japan
| | - Chikao Sugie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, 2-9 Myoken-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8650 Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kawai
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Taiki Takaoka
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Dai Okazaki
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Akira Torii
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Masanari Niwa
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Nozomi Kita
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Seiya Takano
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| | - Shogo Kawakami
- grid.410786.c0000 0000 9206 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0329 Japan
| | - Masayuki Matsuo
- grid.411704.7Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kumano
- grid.411704.7Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan
| | - Makoto Ito
- grid.411234.10000 0001 0727 1557Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195 Japan
| | - Sou Adachi
- grid.411234.10000 0001 0727 1557Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195 Japan
| | - Souichiro Abe
- grid.411234.10000 0001 0727 1557Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195 Japan
| | - Takayuki Murao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, 2-2-22 Bunkyo, Ichinomiya, Aichi 491-8558 Japan
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- grid.411885.10000 0004 0469 6607Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hannan R, Christensen M, Christie A, Garant A, Pedrosa I, Robles L, Mannala S, Wang C, Hammers H, Arafat W, Courtney K, Bowman IA, Sher D, Ahn C, Cole S, Choy H, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J. Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Systemic Therapy-naïve Oligometastatic Kidney Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:695-703. [PMID: 35985982 PMCID: PMC9988242 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based guidelines for the management of systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are lacking. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the potential of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) to provide longitudinal disease control while preserving quality of life (QOL) in patients with systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS RCC patients with three or fewer extracranial metastases were eligible. SAbR was administered longitudinally to all upfront and, as applicable, subsequent metastases. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS This prospective phase II single-arm trial was powered to achieve a primary objective of freedom from systemic therapy for >1 yr in >60% of patients (using the Clopper and Pearson methodology). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from first SAbR to progression not amenable to SAbR (local failure at SAbR-treated sites, new metastases not amenable to SAbR, more than three new metastases, or brain metastases); patient-reported QOL metrics; local control (LC) rates; toxicity; cancer-specific survival (CSS); and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Twenty-three patients received SAbR to 33 initial and 57 total sites. The median follow-up was 21.7 mo (interquartile range 16.3-30.3). Exceeding the prespecified 60% benchmark, freedom from systemic therapy at 1 yr was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.5, 97.8). One-year PFS was 82.6% (95% CI: 60.1, 93.1). QOL was largely unaffected. LC was 100%. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities, but there was one death due to immune-related colitis 3 mo after SAbR while on subsequent checkpoint inhibitor therapy, where a SAbR contribution could not be excluded. One-year OS was 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9, 99.4); one-year CSS was 100%. CONCLUSIONS SAbR for oligometastatic RCC was associated with meaningful longitudinal disease control while preserving QOL. These data support further evaluation of SAbR for systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic RCC. PATIENT SUMMARY Sequential stereotactic radiation therapy can safely and effectively control metastatic kidney cancer with limited spread for over a year without compromising patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Christensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Liliana Robles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Samantha Mannala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Chiachien Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hans Hammers
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Waddah Arafat
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Isaac A Bowman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Chul Ahn
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Cole
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hak Choy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hannan R, Christensen M, Hammers H, Christie A, Paulman B, Lin D, Garant A, Arafat W, Courtney K, Bowman I, Cole S, Sher D, Ahn C, Choy H, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J. Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligoprogressive Metastatic Kidney Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:216-224. [PMID: 34986993 PMCID: PMC9090939 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with systemic therapy sometimes progress at limited sites.The best treatment approach for patients with oligoprogression remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine the ability of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) to extend ongoing systemic therapy in mRCC patients with oligoprogression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted at a university medical center and county hospital, including 20 patients with mRCC on first- to fourth-line systemic therapy with three or fewer sites of progression (including new sites) involving ≤30% of all sites. INTERVENTION SAbR to oligoprogressing metastases at outset and longitudinally, while radiated sites remain controlled and overall disease oligoprogressive. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary objective was to extend ongoing systemic therapy by >6 mo in >40% of patients. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Twenty patients were enrolled. Upfront and sequential SAbR was administered to a total of 37 sites. The local control rate was 100%. At a median follow-up of 10.4 mo (interquartile range: 5.8-16.4), SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy by >6 mo in 14 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.9-90.1). The median time from SAbR to the onset of new systemic therapy or death was 11.1 mo (95% CI: 4.5-19.3). The median duration of SAbR-aided systemic therapy was 24.4 mo (95% CI: 15.3-42.2). Median overall survival was not reached. One patient developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity possibly related to treatment. There was no significant decline in quality of life. Limitations include nonrandomized design and a small patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy for patients with oligoprogressive mRCC without undermining quality of life. These data support the evaluation of SAbR for oligoprogressive mRCC in a prospective randomized clinical trial. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with metastatic kidney cancer on systemic therapy but progressing at limited sites may benefit from focused radiation to progressive sites. Focused radiation was safe and effective, and extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Christensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hans Hammers
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brendan Paulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dandan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Waddah Arafat
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Isaac Bowman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Cole
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hak Choy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Pittman PD, Ahmed AK, Lubelski D, McCarthy EF, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Chondrosarcoma of the spine: a narrative review. Spine J 2021; 21:2078-2096. [PMID: 33971325 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Chondrosarcoma is an uncommon primary bone tumor with an estimated incidence of 0.5 per 100,000 patient-years. Primary chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine and sacrum cumulatively account for less than 20% of all cases, most .commonly causing patients to present with focal pain with or without radiculopathy, or myelopathy secondary to neural element compression. Because of the rarity, patients benefit from multidisciplinary care at academic tertiary-care centers. Current standard-of-care consists of en bloc surgical resection with negative margins; for high grade lesions adjuvant focused radiation with ≥60 gray equivalents is taking an increased role in improving local control. Prognosis is dictated by lesion grade at the time of resection. Several groups have put forth survival calculators and epidemiological evidence suggests prognosis is quite good for lesions receiving R0 resection. Future efforts will be focused on identifying potential chemotherapeutic adjuvants and refining radiation treatments as a means of improving local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA 55905; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287.
| | - Jeff Ehresman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287; Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ USA 85013.
| | - Patricia D Pittman
- Department of Neuropathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA 27710
| | - A Karim Ahmed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - Edward F McCarthy
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA 27710
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY USA 11030.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moran DE, Parikh M, Sheiman RG, Brook OR, Sun MRM, Mahadevan A, Siewert B. Comparison of technical success and safety of transbronchial versus percutaneous CT-guided fiducial placement for SBRT of lung tumors. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2021:S1939-8654(21)00131-4. [PMID: 34229986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the technical success and safety of transbronchial (bronchoscopic) fiducial placement compared to percutaneous CT-guided fiducial placement for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was performed at a single tertiary institution. Consecutive patients undergoing lung fiducial placement for purposes of guiding SBRT (CyberKnife®, Accuray, Inc.) between September 2005 to January 2013 were included in the study. Fiducial seeds were placed percutaneously with CT guidance or transbronchially with bronchoscopic guidance. We compared procedure-related complications (pneumothorax, chest tube placement), technical success (defined as implantation enabling adequate treatment planning with CT simulation) and migration rate. The need for repeat procedures and their mode was noted. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher exact and Chi square probability tests. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-four patients with lung tumors and 272 fiducial seed placements were included in the study. Two hundred and twenty-one of the 272 (81.2%) fiducial markers were placed percutaneously and 51/272 (18.8%) were placed transbronchially. Pneumothorax was seen in 73/221 (33%) of percutaneously-placed fiducials and in 4/51 (7.8%) of transbronchial placements (p<0.001). No significant difference was seen in the rate of chest tube placement between the two groups: 20/221 (9%) of percutaneously placed fiducials and 2/51 (3.9%) of transbronchially placed fiducials (p=0.39). Fifteen of the 51 (29%) of fiducial placements with transbronchial approach were unsuccessful, as discovered at radiotherapy planning session, and required a repeat procedure. Nine of the 15 (60%) of repeat procedures were performed percutaneously, 5/15 (33%) were placed during repeat bronchoscopy, and 1/15 (7%) was placed at transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound. No repeat fiducial placements were required for patients who had the fiducials placed percutaneously (p<0.001), with a technical success rate of 100%. CONCLUSION Transbronchial fiducial marker placement has a significantly higher rate of failed seed placements requiring repeat procedures in comparison to percutaneous placement. Complication rate of pneumothorax requiring chest drain placement is similar between the two approaches.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ruste V, Sunyach MP, Tanguy R, Jouanneau E, Schiffler C, Carbonnaux M, Moriceau G, Neidhardt EM, Boyle H, Robin S, Négrier S, Fléchon A. Synchronous brain metastases as a poor prognosis factor in clear cell renal carcinoma: a strong argument for systematic brain screening. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:133-41. [PMID: 33837880 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03751-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases (BM) usually represent a poor prognostic factor in solid tumors. About 10% of patients with renal cancer (RCC) will present BM. Local therapies such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and surgery are used to achieve brain control. We compared survival between patients with synchronous BM (SynBM group) and metachronous BM (MetaBM group). METHODS It is a retrospective study of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and BM treated with TKI between 2005 and 2019 at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon. We collected prognostic factors: The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, the TNM stage, the histological subtypes and the Fuhrman grade. Overall survival (OS) was defined from diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC to death. Brain progression-free survival (B-PFS) was defined from focal brain therapy to brain progression or death. RESULTS 99 patients were analyzed, 44 in the SynBM group and 55 in the MetaBM group. OS in the MetaBM group was 49.4 months versus 19.6 months in the SynBM group, p = 0.0002. The median time from diagnosis of metastasic disease to apparition of BM in the MetaBM group was 22.9 months (4.3; 125.7). SRT was used for 101 lesions (66.4%), WBRT for 25 patients (16.4%), surgery for 21 lesions (13.8%), surgery followed by radiation for 5 lesions (3.3%). B-PFS for all patients was 7 months (IC95% [5.0-10.5]). CONCLUSIONS Survival of patients with synchronous BM is inferior to that of patients with metachronous BM. Outcome is poor in both cases after diagnosis of BM. Brain screening should be encouraged at time of diagnosis of metastatis in ccRCC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, McCarthy EF, Ahmed AK, Pittman PD, Lubelski D, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a narrative review. Spine J 2021; 21:500-517. [PMID: 33589095 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Chordoma is a notochord-derived primary tumor of the skull base and vertebral column known to affect 0.08 to 0.5 per 100,000 persons worldwide. Patients commonly present with mechanical, midline pain with or without radicular features secondary to nerve root compression. Management of these lesions has classically revolved around oncologic resection, defined by en bloc resection of the lesion with negative margins as this was found to significantly improve both local control and overall survival. With advancement in radiation modalities, namely the increased availability of focused photon therapy and proton beam radiation, high-dose (>50 Gy) neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy is also becoming a standard of care. At present chemotherapy does not appear to have a role, but ongoing investigations into the ontogeny and molecular pathophysiology of chordoma promise to identify therapeutic targets that may further alter this paradigm. In this narrative review we describe the epidemiology, histopathology, diagnosis, and treatment of chordoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Jeff Ehresman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Edward F McCarthy
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - A Karim Ahmed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Patricia D Pittman
- Department of Neuropathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gutzmer R, Vordermark D, Hassel JC, Krex D, Wendl C, Schadendorf D, Sickmann T, Rieken S, Pukrop T, Höller C, Eigentler TK, Meier F. Melanoma brain metastases - Interdisciplinary management recommendations 2020. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 89:102083. [PMID: 32736188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common and associated with a particularly poor prognosis; they directly cause death in 60-70% of melanoma patients. In the past, systemic treatments have shown response rates around 5%, whole brain radiation as standard of care has achieved a median overall survival of approximately three months. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of MAP-kinase inhibitors both have shown very promising response rates of up to 55% and 58%, respectively, and improved survival. However, current clinical evidence is based on multi-cohort studies only, as prospectively randomized trials have been carried out rarely in MBM, independently whether investigating systemic therapy, radiotherapy or surgical techniques. Here, an interdisciplinary expert team reviewed the outcome of prospectively conducted clinical studies in MBM, identified evidence gaps and provided recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, outcome evaluation and monitoring of MBM patients. The recommendations refer to four distinct scenarios: patients (i) with 'brain-only' disease, (ii) with oligometastatic asymptomatic intra- and extracranial disease, (iii) with multiple asymptomatic metastases, and (iv) with multiple symptomatic MBM or leptomeningeal disease. Changes in current management recommendations comprise the use of immunotherapy - preferably combined anti-CTLA-4/PD-1-immunotherapy - in asymptomatic MBM minus/plus stereotactic radiosurgery which remains the mainstay of local brain therapy being safe and effective. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy provides no clinical benefit in oligometastatic MBM. Among the systemic therapies, combined MAPK-kinase inhibition provides, in BRAFV600-mutated patients with rapidly progressing or/and symptomatic MBM, an alternative to combined immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Wendl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Rieken
- Policlinic for Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Höller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas K Eigentler
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diamantopoulos LN, Khaki AR, Sonpavde GP, Venur VA, Yu EY, Wright JL, Grivas P. Central Nervous System Metastasis in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma: Institutional Experience and a Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:e266-e276. [PMID: 32178979 PMCID: PMC7272305 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) is uncommon and poorly understood. We aimed to explore the clinical behavior and outcomes of this unique patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with UC and CNS metastasis, treated in our institution (2006-2018), along with an exploratory patient-point meta-analysis of a similar patient population derived from a comprehensive literature review. Data regarding diagnosis, management, and outcomes were extracted. Overall survival, time to CNS metastasis (TTCM), and residual survival (RS) from CNS involvement to death were calculated (Kaplan-Meier method). Cox regression was used for testing key clinicopathologic associations. RESULTS We identified 20 "institutional" and 154 "literature" patients with adequate data granularity for analysis. Median TTCM was 17.7 (institutional cohort) and 10 (literature cohort) months. Most patients who developed CNS metastases had previous non-CNS metastasis (15/20 [75%] and 103/154 [67%], respectively). CNS lesions without previous history of metastasis were identified in 5/20 (25%) and 33/154 (21%) cases and those patients had a shorter TTCM. CNS lesions in the absence of known UC history were also documented in 18/154 (12%) literature cases. Multifocal CNS disease was associated with shorter RS in both cohorts in univariate, but not multivariate, analysis. CONCLUSION We observed a variability in disease presentation and course, with a subset of patients showing an early predilection for CNS insult, potentially reflecting a diverse underlying biology. Genomic profiling studies, elucidating the molecular landscape, and driving future treatments should be considered in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas N Diamantopoulos
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Vyshak A Venur
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ali AS, Chen VE, Zurlo C, Taylor JM, Fernandez C, Shi W. Target treatment with stereotactic radiation for recurrent gliomas. Chin Clin Oncol 2020; 9:74. [PMID: 32389000 DOI: 10.21037/cco.2020.03.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
High grade gliomas (HGG) have a propensity to recur locally and have poor outcomes. As such, safe and effective treatment is paramount. Target treatment with stereotactic radiation allows safe re-irradiation through minimizing normal brain tissue radiation due to its high precision. In this review, we evaluated the clinical experiences using SRS and FSRT for re-irradiation in HGG. We report the radiobiological advantages and disadvantages of both modalities as well as the safety and efficacy published in current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha S Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Victor E Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Claire Zurlo
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James M Taylor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christian Fernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mills MN, Figura NB, Arrington JA, Yu HHM, Etame AB, Vogelbaum MA, Soliman H, Czerniecki BJ, Forsyth PA, Han HS, Ahmed KA. Management of brain metastases in breast cancer: a review of current practices and emerging treatments. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:279-300. [PMID: 32030570 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05552-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are becoming an increasingly common diagnosis due to improved systemic control and more routine surveillance imaging. Treatment continues to require a multidisciplinary approach managing systemic and intracranial disease burden. Although, improvements have been made in the diagnosis and management of BCBM, brain metastasis patients continue to pose a challenge for practitioners. METHODS In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in the treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of BCBM. RESULTS We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation for BCBM. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing prospective trials enrolling BCBM patients and their biologic rationale. CONCLUSIONS BCBM management is an increasing clinical concern. Multidisciplinary management combining the strengths of surgical, systemic, and radiation treatment modalities with prospective trials incorporating knowledge from the basic and translational sciences will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for BCBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Nicholas B Figura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - John A Arrington
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hatem Soliman
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Myrehaug S, Hallet J, Chu W, Yong E, Law C, Assal A, Koshkina O, Louie AV, Singh S. Proof of concept for stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of functional neuroendocrine neoplasms. J Radiosurg SBRT 2020; 6:321-324. [PMID: 32185093 PMCID: PMC7065890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Dysregulated hormonal production remains a challenge in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). We report 4 cases of patients with functional NEN treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to either the primary/dominant metastatic site of disease or the end organ of hormonal release. No significant toxicities were observed during or after treatment. Each patient has had biochemical, clinical and radiographic response to therapy, providing proof of concept that SBRT is an effective therapeutic strategy for functional neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Elaine Yong
- Division of Gastroenterology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Calvin Law
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Angela Assal
- Division of Endocrinology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Olexandra Koshkina
- Division of Endocrinology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alexander V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Simron Singh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto. 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lucke-Wold B, Scott K. A Brief Overview of Neurosurgical Management for Breast Cancer Metastasis. SF J Med Oncol Cancer 2020; 1:1001. [PMID: 32613208 PMCID: PMC7328909 DOI: pmid/32613208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances in chemotherapy and radiation, stage IV breast cancer presents a serious challenge to clinicians in light of the continued poor outcomes for patients. Stage IV breast cancer frequently metastasizes to the brain often necessitating neurosurgical intervention. The goals of the neurosurgeon are to adequately address metastatic disease to the central nervous system, limit morbidity for the patients, while preserving as much neurologic function as possible, and to help guide next steps regarding need for radiation and immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a background overview of the role of neurosurgery in managing stage IV metastatic breast cancer involving the brain, discuss what is known about brain metastasis, and highlight avenues for future study and investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Correspondence: Brandon Lucke-Wold, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Wagner P, Proust F, Thiery A, Labani A, Noël G. [Skull base meningioma: Clinical and radiological efficacy based on a quantitative volumetric analysis]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:290-295. [PMID: 31128988 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To date, no correlation has been found between clinical and radiological efficacy after irradiation of skull base meningiomas. However, the evaluation of the radiological response was most often made by questionable methods that may have underestimated the radiological effectiveness of radiotherapy. The objective of this work is to verify this hypothesis by quantitative volumetric analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 35 patients treated with either helical tomotherapy (45.7%) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (54.3%) were retrospectively analysed. These were mainly women (94%) aged 59 (43-81) with lesions mainly of the cavernous sinus (60%). There was a median of 2 (1-4) symptoms and the main symptoms were visual impairment (39%), cranial nerve deficits (23.4%) and headaches (17.2%). RESULTS Median tumour volume decreased significantly (P<0.05) from 9.6mL (0.3-36.6) to 6.8mL (0.1-26.5) after median follow-up of 44 months (24-77). Sixty-three percent of patients had an improvement of at least one symptom. In univariate analysis, clinical efficacy (P<0.05), radiotherapy technique (P<0.05), tumor topography (P<0.05) and initial tumor volume (P<0.05) were predictive factors for radiological response. In multivariate analysis, only the inverse correlation between radiological response and initial tumor volume remained significant (ρ: -0.47 95% CI -3.2 to 5.7; P<0.05). CONCLUSION The quantitative volumetric monitoring demonstrates a major radiological efficiency of radiotherapy. However, no clear correlation between clinical and radiological efficacy was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Brahimi
- University radiation oncology department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - D Antoni
- University radiation oncology department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratory of radiobiology, EA 3430, Federation of translational medicine, Strasbourg (FMTS), Strasbourg university, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - R Srour
- Neurosurgery department, hôpital Pasteur, 39, avenue de la Liberté, 68000 Colmar, France
| | - P Wagner
- Department of radiology, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - F Proust
- Neurosurgery department, CHU de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Thiery
- Epidemiology and biostatistics department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - A Labani
- Department of radiology, CHU de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- University radiation oncology department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratory of radiobiology, EA 3430, Federation of translational medicine, Strasbourg (FMTS), Strasbourg university, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Milano MT, Katz AW, Zhang H, Huggins CF, Aujla KS, Okunieff P. Oligometastatic breast cancer treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: Some patients survive longer than a decade. Radiother Oncol 2019; 131:45-51. [PMID: 30773186 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical state of oligometastases describes metastases limited in number and extent, amenable to metastasis-directed therapy. We sought to analyze long-term outcomes and characterize potential prognostic factors, in women with breast cancer (BC) oligometastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation (HSRT) therapy on a prospective phase II protocol. METHODS Forty-eight women with 1-5 extracranial BC oligometastases received HSRT to all radiographically apparent sites of disease. Various dose-fractionation schedules were used. Most (n = 27) received 10 daily fractions, typically ≥50 Gy (n = 17). RESULTS BC patients with bone-only oligometastases (BO, n = 12) vs. all other patients (non-BO; n = 36) were significantly younger, more likely to present with oligometastases at the time of primary BC diagnosis (i.e., synchronous), and significantly more likely to have had hormone receptor-positive disease. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates after HSRT were 83% and 75%, respectively, for BO patients vs. 31% and 17%, respectively, for non-BO patients (p = 0.002). BO patients experienced a significantly (p = 0.018) greater freedom from widespread metastases (FFWM). Among non-BO patients, net oligometastatic GTV >25 cc (reflecting disease burden) was a significant factor for freedom from local recurrence (p = 0.047) and FFWM (p = 0.028). The number of oligometastatic lesions (p = 0.007) and organs (p = 0.001) involved were also significant factors for FFWM in non-BO patients. CONCLUSIONS Some patients with BC oligometastases treated with HSRT can survive >10 years. Tumor burden (volume and number of lesions) appears to impact risk of recurrence. Further research is needed to help better identify BC patients most likely to benefit from metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
19
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Proust F, Cebula H, Labani A, Noël G. [Base of the skull meningioma: Efficacy, clinical tolerance and radiological evaluation after radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:264-286. [PMID: 29773473 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Skull base meningioma leads to functional disturbances, which can significantly alter the quality of life. The optimal management of these lesions, whose goals are neurological preservation and tumour local control, is not yet clearly established. It is widely recognized that the goal of a radical excision should be abandoned despite the advances in the field of microsurgery of skull base lesions. Although less morbid, partial tumour excision would be associated with increased risk of local tumour recurrence. Although discussed both exclusive and adjuvant have proven to be highly successful in terms of clinical improvement and local control. Various radiation techniques have demonstrated their efficacy in the management of this pathology. However, high rates of clinical improvement are in contrast with low rates of radiological improvement. The notion of clinical and radiological dissociation appeared. However, in most of these studies, the analysis of the radiological response could be subject of legitimate criticism. This work proposes to review the local control, the efficacy and the clinical tolerance and the radiological response of the various radiation techniques for the meningioma of the base of the skull and to demonstrate the interest of quantitative volumetric analyses in the follow-up of meningioma after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Brahimi
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - R Srour
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Pasteur, 39, avenue de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, France
| | - F Proust
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - H Cebula
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Labani
- Service de radiologie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kumar AMS, Miller J, Hoffer SA, Mansur DB, Coffey M, Lo SS, Sloan AE, Machtay M. Postoperative hypofractionated stereotactic brain radiation (HSRT) for resected brain metastases: improved local control with higher BED 10. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:449-54. [PMID: 29749569 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2885-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HSRT directed to large surgical beds in patients with resected brain metastases improves local control while sparing patients the toxicity associated with whole brain radiation. We review our institutional series to determine factors predictive of local failure. METHODS In a total of 39 consecutive patients with brain metastases treated from August 2011 to August 2016, 43 surgical beds were treated with HSRT in three or five fractions. All treatments were completed on a robotic radiosurgery platform using the 6D Skull tracking system. Volumetric MRIs from before and after surgery were used for radiation planning. A 2-mm PTV margin was used around the contoured surgical bed and resection margins; these were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and neurosurgeon. Lower total doses were prescribed based on proximity to critical structures or if prior radiation treatments were given. Local control in this study is defined as no volumetric MRI evidence of recurrence of tumor within the high dose radiation volume. Statistics were calculated using JMP Pro v13. RESULTS Of the 43 surgical beds analyzed, 23 were from NSCLC, 5 were from breast, 4 from melanoma, 5 from esophagus, and 1 each from SCLC, sarcoma, colon, renal, rectal, and unknown primary. Ten were treated with three fractions with median dose 24 Gy and 33 were treated with five fractions with median dose 27.5 Gy using an every other day fractionation. There were no reported grade 3 or higher toxicities. Median follow up was 212 days after completion of radiation. 10 (23%) surgical beds developed local failure with a median time to failure of 148 days. All but three patients developed new brain metastases outside of the treated field and were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, whole brain radiation and/or chemotherapy. Five patients (13%) developed leptomeningeal disease. With a median follow up of 226 days, 30 Gy/5 fx was associated with the best local control (93%) with only 1 local failure. A lower total dose in five fractions (ie 27.5 or 25 Gy) had a local control rate of 70%. For three fraction SBRT, local control was 100% using a dose of 27 Gy in three fractions (follow up was > 600 days) and 71% if 24 Gy in three fractions was used. A higher total biologically equivalent dose (BED10) was statistically significant for improved local control (p = 0.04) with a threshold BED10 ≥ 48 associated with better local control. CONCLUSIONS HSRT after surgical resection for brain metastasis is well tolerated and has improved local control with BED10 ≥ 48 (30 Gy/5 fx and 27 Gy/3 fx). Additional study is warranted.
Collapse
|
21
|
Shi W, Blomain ES, Siglin J, Palmer JD, Dan T, Wang Y, Werner-Wasik M, Glass J, Kim L, Bar Ad V, Bhamidipati D, Evans JJ, Judy K, Farrell CJ, Andrews DW. Salvage fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (FSRT) for patients with recurrent high grade gliomas progressed after bevacizumab treatment. J Neurooncol 2017; 137:171-177. [PMID: 29235052 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2709-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Bevacizumab failure is a major clinical problem in the management of high grade gliomas (HGG), with a median overall survival (OS) of < 4 months. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (FSRT) for patients progressed after Bevacizumab treatment. Retrospective review was conducted of 36 patients treated with FSRT after progression on bevacizumab. FSRT was most commonly delivered in 3.5 Gy fractions to a total dose of 35 Gy. Survival from initial diagnosis, as well as from recurrence and re-irradiation, were utilized as study endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. The median time from initial bevacizumab treatment to FSRT was 8.5 months. The median plan target volume for FSRT was 27.5 cc. The median OS from FSRT was 4.8 months. FSRT treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3 or higher toxicity. Favorable outcomes were observed in patients with recurrent HGG who received salvage FSRT after bevacizumab failure. The treatment was well tolerated. Prospective study is warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of salvage FSRT for selected patients with recurrent HGG amenable to FSRT, who had failed bevacizumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Erik S Blomain
- Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Siglin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Altoona Cancer Center, Altoona, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tu Dan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yang Wang
- Cyberknife Center, Huashan Hospital Pudong, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jon Glass
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lyndon Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Voichita Bar Ad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Deepak Bhamidipati
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kevin Judy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher J Farrell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David W Andrews
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Folkert MR, Timmerman RD. Stereotactic ablative body radiosurgery (SABR) or Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; 109:3-14. [PMID: 27932046 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2015] [Revised: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
While conventional treatment relies on protracted courses of therapy using relatively small dose-per-fraction sizes of 1.8-2Gy, there is substantial evidence gathered over decades that this may not be the optimal approach for all targetable disease. Stereotactic ablative body radiosurgery (SABR) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a technique which uses precise targeting to deliver high doses of radiation capable of ablating tumors directly. In this review, we will discuss the justification for and techniques used to deliver ablative doses to improve treatment outcomes, interactions with biological and immunologic therapy, and special procedures to spare normal tissue, which have facilitated the expanding role for these techniques in the management of a wide range of malignant histologies and disease states.
Collapse
|
23
|
Stefan D, Popotte H, Stefan AR, Tesniere A, Tomaszewski A, Lesueur P, Habrand JL, Verneuil L. Vemurafenib and concomitant stereotactic radiation for the treatment of melanoma with spinal metastases: A case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015; 21:76-80. [PMID: 26900362 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
A 56-year-old man with BRAFV600E melanoma and spinal metastases treated with vemurafenib and stereotactic radiation showed a partial response without neurological, skin or mucosal toxicity, 8 months after completion of this combination. This case suggests that stereotactic radiation spares normal tissues and might be safer than conventional fractionated radiation with vemurafenib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinu Stefan
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue General Harris, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Hosni Popotte
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue General Harris, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Andreea Raluca Stefan
- CHU-Caen, Dermatology, F-14033 Caen, France; Université-Caen-Basse-Normandie, Medical-School-Caen, F-14000, France
| | - Audrey Tesniere
- CHU-Caen, Dermatology, F-14033 Caen, France; Université-Caen-Basse-Normandie, Medical-School-Caen, F-14000, France
| | - Aurélie Tomaszewski
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue General Harris, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue General Harris, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue General Harris, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Laurence Verneuil
- CHU-Caen, Dermatology, F-14033 Caen, France; Université-Caen-Basse-Normandie, Medical-School-Caen, F-14000, France
| |
Collapse
|