Treatment Trends and Outcomes for Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Cancer of the Penis

Regional lymph node mapping in patients with penile cancer undergoing radical inguinal lymph node dissection - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Radical inguinal lymph node dissection (rILND) is the most available treatment to cure penile cancer (PC) with limited inguinal-confined disease. However, guidelines regarding acceptable boundaries of rILND are controversial, and consensus is lacking. The authors aimed to standardize the surgical boundaries of rILND with definite pathological evidence and explore the distribution pattern of inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) in PC.

METHODS

A total of 414 PC patients from two centers who underwent rILND were enrolled. The ILN distribution was divided into seven zones anatomically for pathological examination. Student's t test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

ILNs displayed a funnel-shaped distribution with high density in superior regions. ILNs and metastatic nodes are present anywhere within the radical boundaries. Positive ILNs were mainly concentrated in zone I (51.7%) and zone II (41.3%), but there were 8.7% and 12.3% in inferior zones V and VI, respectively, and 7.1% in the deep ILNs. More importantly, a single positive ILN and first-station positive zone was detected in all seven regions. Single positive ILNs were located in zones I through VI in 40.4%, 23.6%, 6.7%, 18.0%, 4.5%, and 1.1%, respectively, and 5.6% presented deep ILN metastasis directly.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors established a detailed ILN distribution map and displayed lymphatic drainage patterns with definite pathological evidence using a large cohort of PC patients. Single positive ILNs and first-station metastatic zones were observed in any region, even directly with deep ILN metastasis. Only rILND can ensure tumor-free resection without the omission of positive nodes.

Management of Lymph Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.

Genomic Profiles and Clinical Outcomes of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden

Importance

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a putative biomarker of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies of solid tumors, but not specifically for penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC).

Objective

To characterize biomarker features and ICI therapy outcomes associated with high TMB in PSCC in the routine clinical practice setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, 397 PSCC cases were analyzed to identify genomic alterations in more than 300 cancer-associated genes and genomic signatures, including TMB, using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay. Tumor mutational burden was categorized as low (<10 mutations per megabase [mut/Mb]), high (10-19 mut/Mb), or very high (≥20 mut/Mb). Germline status of genetic alterations was predicted using a validated somatic-germline computational method. Clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic PSCC receiving first-line ICI were abstracted using the deidentified nationwide Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2022.

Exposure

Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using FoundationOne and FoundationOne CDx assays from Foundation Medicine Inc.

Main outcomes and measures

The spectrum of genetic alterations by TMB level in PSCC, the percentage of germline genetic alterations, and the outcome (overall survival with routine clinical treatment) by TMB of chemotherapy-naive patients with PSCC who received ICI treatment up front were assessed in this descriptive study.

Results

Among 397 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [54-73] years; 266 [67.0%] of European, 83 [20.9%] of admixed American, and 34 [8.5%] of African or other genomic ancestry), the median (IQR) age (eg, 65 [53-73] years for low TMB vs 68 [61-78] years for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) and genomic ancestry distribution (eg, European 228 of 339 [67.3%] for low TMB vs 38 of 58 [65.5%] for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) were similar between TMB subgroups. There were 339 PSCC cases (85.4%) with low TMB, 40 cases (10.1%) with high TMB, and 18 cases (4.5%) with very high TMB. Comparisons of TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher vs low TMB showed an enrichment of genetic alterations in PIK3CA (48.3% vs 18.3%; P < .001) and KMT2D (29.3% vs 7.7%; P < .001) and less frequent genetic alterations in CDKN2A (25.9% vs 45.7%; P = .05). Most genetic alterations did not co-occur. Human papillomavirus identification was more frequent as TMB increased: 28.3% for low TMB, 50.0% for high, and 72.2% for very high. In total, 95 of 1377 genetic alterations (6.9%) were germline. Of 10 patients identified from the CGDB receiving frontline ICIs, median (IQR) follow-up was 9.9 months. Four patients had overall survival with clinical treatment of more than 12 months, including 2 of 3 patients with TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of advanced metastatic PSCC based on TMB levels, significant differences were observed for biomarkers in nearly 15% of patients with a TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Germline testing and ICI-based therapy should be integrated into the management of selected PSCC cases.

[Systemic treatment of penile cancer: New concepts? New achievements?]

Systemic chemotherapy has been in use for metastatic penile carcinoma for years, but its success is limited. Its significance is largely associated with its role in multimodal treatment for lymphatic metastasis in the context of radical lymph node surgery. In cases of limited lymph node involvement, the combination of surgical treatment plus cisplatin- and taxane-based triple combinations may be curative. Advances in the understanding of molecular changes in penile cancer and the search for potential therapy targets have led to numerous studies. Although there is evidence of efficacy of immunotherapeutics, no significant therapeutic improvements have been seen in the clinical routine.

Nationwide Data Support Centralised Decision-making in Penile Cancer Care: A Before-and-After Study on Guideline Adherence and Disease-specific survival for Patients with an Indication for Perioperative Oncological Treatment

Background

The benefit of perioperative oncological treatment in men with penile cancer is uncertain. In 2015, treatment recommendations were centralised in Sweden and treatment guidelines were updated.

Objective

To evaluate if the use of oncological treatment in men with penile cancer increased after the introduction of centralised recommendations, and whether such therapy is associated with better survival.

Design setting and participants

This was a retrospective cohort study including a total of 426 men diagnosed with penile cancer with lymph node or distant metastases in Sweden during 2000-2018.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

We first assessed the change in the proportion of patients with an indication for perioperative oncological treatment who actually received such treatment. Second, we used Cox regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for disease-specific mortality associated with perioperative treatment. Comparisons were made for both all men without perioperative treatment and for those who did not receive treatment but who lacked apparent contraindications for treatment.

Results and limitations

The use of perioperative oncological treatment increased from 2000 to 2018, from 32% of patients with an indication for treatment during the first 4 yr to 63% during the last 4 yr. In comparison to patients potentially eligible for oncological treatment who did not receive it, those who were treated had a 37% lower risk of disease-specific death (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.98). Stage migration because of improvements in diagnostic tools over time may have inflated the more recent survival estimates. An influence of residual confounding due to comorbidity and other potential confounders cannot be excluded.

Conclusions

The use of perioperative oncological treatment increased after the centralisation of penile cancer care in Sweden. Although the observational study design precludes causal inference, the findings suggest that perioperative treatment in patients with penile cancer eligible for treatment may be associated with better survival.

Patient summary

In this study, we looked at the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for men with penile cancer and lymph node metastases in Sweden during 2000-2018. We found an increase in the use of cancer therapy and an increase in survival for patients who received such therapy.

Global research trends in penile cancer: Bibliometric and visualized analysis

Background

Penile cancer is a malignant tumor of the genitourinary system that mostly occurs in middle-aged and elderly men aged 50-70 years, which can seriously affect physical, psychological, and sexual health. Hundreds of original articles and reviews on penile cancer are published each year. However, a bibliometric analysis of these publications has not been performed.

Objective

This study aimed to systematically analyze and visualize penile cancer-related publications through bibliometrics and reveal identified topics, hotspots, and knowledge gaps in related fields.

Methods

Based on the Web of Science core collection database, we first analyzed the quantity and quality of publications in the field of penile cancer. Second, we profiled the publishing groups in terms of country, institution, author's publication, and cooperation network. Then, we systematized and summarized the hot topics of research.

Results

This bibliometric analysis was conducted from 2001 to 2022. The analysis identified 1,687 articles and reviews, which were published in 432 journals. The number of publications and citations on penile cancer-related research has steadily increased over the last two decades. Furthermore, academic institutions in Europe and the United States play a leading role in penile cancer research. The country, institution, journal, and author with the most publications were the United States (507), H Lee Moffitt Cancer Research Center (96), Journal of Urology (83), and Spiess P (87), respectively. The most frequently used keywords were penile cancer (743), squamous-cell carcinoma (717), cancer (380), carcinoma (232), lymphadenectomy (229). 16 keyword clustering information was obtained, including #0 male circumcision, #1 lichen sclerosus, #2 chemotherapy, #3 penile neoplasms, #4 targeted therapy, #5 resection margin, #6 cervical cancer, #7 lymph node dissection, #8 prognostic factor, #9 prostate cancer, #10 inguinal lymph node dissection, #11 human papillomavirus DNA, #12 gene, #13 penile intraepithelial neoplasia, #14 male sexual function, and #15 penile cancer.

Conclusion

More and more scholars are devoted to the research on penile cancer. This bibliometric analysis revealed that the main research topics and hotspots in penile cancer included risk factors and surgical treatment plans.

Effect of inguinal lymph node dissection in lymph node negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

INTRODUCTION

The survival benefit of inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) vs no ILND in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP) and the absence of lymph node invasion is unclear. We addressed this uncertainty within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER 2000-2018) database.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified lymph node negative SCCP patients who either underwent ILND (pN0) or clinical examination only (cN0). We tested for the effect of ILND vs no ILND on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in Kaplan-Meier plots, univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, in a pT stage-specific fashion, before and after 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM). Sensitivity analyses were conducted according to historical and contemporary treatment periods as well as geographic regions.

RESULTS

Of 2520 SCCP patients, 369 (15%) underwent ILND (pN0) vs 2151 (85%) did not (cN0). The pN0 vs cN0 distribution according to pT stages was as follows: 80 (7%) vs 1092 (93%) in pT1b, and 289 (21%) vs 1059 (79%) in pT2-3. At 36 months, CSM-free survival in pT2-3 stage was 89% in ILND vs 74% in no ILND patients (multivariable hazard ratio: 0.42, CI 0.30-0.60, p < 0.001). This result was confirmed in sensitivity analyses, and after 1:3 PSM. The same analyses could not be completed in pT1b stage due to insufficient number of observations and events.

CONCLUSIONS

In pT2-3 stage SCCP, a significantly lower CSM was recorded in lymph node negative patients treated with ILND than in their clinical lymph node negative counterparts who did not undergo ILND.

Contemporary use trends and effect on survival of pelvic lymph node dissection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Background

Patients diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who are at a very high risk of disease progression and failure of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin treatment are recommended to undergo immediate radical cystectomy (RC). The role and optimal degree of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during RC for NMIBC patients, however, have not been well investigated.

Patients and methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan–Meier technique. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine independent factors of OS.

Results

A total of 1,701 patients were identified in the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. Any level of PLND (>0 lymph nodes examined) was performed in 1,092 patients (64.2%). The median number of lymph nodes examined was 8 (interquartile range, 0–20) in T1, 0 (interquartile range, 0–11) in Ta, and 0 (interquartile range, 0–14) in Tia patients. Compared with non-PLND, any level of PLND improved OS in T1 but not in Ta or Tis patients. Compared to limited (1–9 lymph nodes examined) and non-PLND, extensive PLND (lymph nodes examined ≥10) resulted in better OS only in T1 patients (all p < 0.001, adjusted significance level = 0.017). PLND was identified as a independent protective factor for OS.

Conclusion

Based on the SEER database, we found that PLND during RC led to better OS and extensive PLND was associated with better OS in T1 but not in Ta or Tis patients. The implementation of PLND was insufficient both in population proportions and scope.

Chemotherapy Utilization in Men with Advanced Penile Cancer

Introduction

Although studies using mixed insurance populations suggest that chemotherapy use in men with advanced penile cancer (PC) is low, it is unclear what regimens are being utilized. In this study, we use a database of insured patients to better understand specific chemotherapy utilization in men with PC.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IIIB or IV PC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (2004-2015). Standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy was defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® guidelines: 4 cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or primary setting. We calculated what proportion of patients receive SOC or any chemotherapy within 2 years of diagnosis and analyzed what factors were associated with receiving chemotherapy.

Results

Our study included 147 patients-48 stage IIIB and 99 stage IV. Of these patients, 49 (33%) received chemotherapy. Less than 5% of men received SOC. About 10% received SOC chemotherapy but an insufficient number of cycles. Married men were more likely to undergo chemotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.8). Less than 5% of the 24 Black or Hispanic patients received chemotherapy compared to 37% of white patients (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Only a third of men with stage IIIB/IV PC underwent chemotherapy. Less than 5% of men received complete guideline-based regimens. Whether this is driven primarily by patient or provider factors is unknown, although social determinants of health may play a role. These data highlight the difficulty for patients with PC to get chemotherapy.

Risk factors and survival outcomes for upstaging after inguinal lymph node dissection for cN1 penile squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify incidence and risk factors for upstaging from cN1 to pN2/N3 at inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) for penile cancer (pSCC). Our secondary objective is to assess survival outcomes and associations for cN1 patients undergoing ILND.

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pT≥1cN1cM0 pSCC who underwent bilateral ILND and had complete data were identified in a multi-institutional international cohort from 8 referral centers in 7 countries diagnosed from 1980 to 2017. Upstaging was defined as pN2/N3 at ILND. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations with upstaging, and Cox multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine associations with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 144 patients were included in the final study population. 84 patients (58%) were upstaged from cN1 to pN2/N3, and 25 (17%) were down staged to pN0. Upstaging was associated with pT3/T4 (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.7, P < 0.01) and pTX (OR 7.1, 95CI 1.6-51.1, P = 0.02). Age, smoking status, HPV status, and LVI were not associated with upstaging. Age (HR 1.03/y, 95%CI 1.01-1.06, P < 0.01) and upstaging (HR 2.8, 95%CI 1.3-5.9, P < 0.01) were associated with worse OS. Upstaged patients had a 5-year OS of 49%, compared with 86% for patients who were not upstaged.

CONCLUSION

The majority of cN1 pSCC patients harbor a higher-risk disease state than their clinical staging suggests, especially those with higher pT stages. More intensive pre-operative workup may be warranted for these patients to identify upstaging prior to ILND and potentially qualify them for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or clinical trials.

Multimodal Treatment Combining Salvage Surgery-Assisted Chemotherapy and Checkpoints Blockade Immunotherapy Achieves Complete Remission on a Recurrent Penile Cancer Patient: A Case Report

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a rare disease in developed countries. pSCC causes a severe health problem and social burden in developing countries. We reported a 49-year-old male recurrent pSCC patient with medium PD-L1 expression and low TMB. The patient obtained complete response after multimodal therapy (MMT). The clinical manifestation is a recurrence in the right groin with nearly ruptured pSCC. He had partial resection of penile cancer plus bilateral groin lymph node dissection and pelvic lymph node dissection during the first operation. Pathology of the recurrent tumor showed fibrous tissue with cancer infiltration and necrosis. We used MMT, including resection of palliative right inguinal metastases, four cycles of paclitaxel+bleomycin+cisplatin, and continuous sintilimab to treat the patient. The patient had a complete response (CR) after four cycles of therapy and sustained CR for 18 months with continuous sintilimab, showing a good tolerance and acceptable toxicity. This is the first case presenting a complete response in a relapsed pSCC patient. These results suggest that MMT is worth exploring.

Underutilization of Surgical Standard of Care for Insured Men with Invasive Penile Cancer

PURPOSE

Prior studies of mixed insurance populations have demonstrated poor adherence to surgical standard of care (SOC) for penile cancer. We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry linked to Medicare to calculate SOC adherence to surgical treatment of penile cancer in insured men over the age of 65, focusing on potential social and racial disparities.

METHODS

This is an observational analysis of patients with T2-4 penile cancer of any histologic subtype without metastasis in the SEER-Medicare database (2004-2015). SOC was defined as penectomy (partial or radical) with bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We calculated proportions of those receiving SOC and constructed multivariate models to identify factors associated with receiving SOC.

RESULTS

A total of 447 men were included. Of these men, 22.1% (99/447) received SOC while 18.8% (84/447) received no treatment at all. Only 23.3% (104/447) had ILND while 80.9% (362/447) underwent total or partial penectomy. Race and socioeconomic status (SES) were not associated with decreased SOC. Increasing age (OR 0.93, 95%CI:0.89-0.96), Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 2 (OR 0.53, 95%CI:0.29-0.97), and T3-T4 disease (OR 0.34, 95%CI:0.18-0.65) were associated with not receiving SOC on adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of SOC are low among insured men 65 years of age or older with invasive penile cancer, regardless of race or SES. This finding is largely driven by low rates of ILND. Strategies are needed to overcome barriers to SOC treatment for men with invasive penile cancer.

[Penile carcinoma: Practical issues, from the biopsy to surgery]

The management of a penile carcinoma is complex, a collaboration between radiologist, pathologist and urologist is necessary to obtain a correct staging. In this review we try to demonstrate step by step how to achieve a complete pathology report, how to manage the patient (imaging, biopsy, fresh frozen section and surgery).

Management of Advanced Penile Cancer

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare cancer, with approximately 2000 new cases in the United States and 35,000 globally every year. Multiple risk factors are involved in PSCC, but most importantly, the high-risk human papillomavirus infection is thought to be present in approximately 50% of cases. Penile squamous cell carcinoma presents as localized or locally advanced disease. Multiple prognostic markers have been explored over the past 3 decades, but lymph node status remains the strongest predictor of clinical outcomes. Surgical decisions are based on the primary tumor pathologic findings, nodal clinical examination, and imaging results. Most patients with high-risk advanced PSCC benefit from a multimodal treatment approach combining chemotherapy with consolidation surgical treatment. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radiation therapy has not been well explored in PSCC. Prospective clinical studies, like the International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial, have been launched to provide high-level evidence for multimodal treatment. The International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial is the first randomized clinical trial among patients with PSCC and is currently accruing, with the expectation to generate results in 2023. Unfortunately, most patients with high-risk locally advanced PSCC will have relapsed or refractory cancer after cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. These patients have dismal outcomes with salvage chemotherapy, highlighting the major unmet need to expand our knowledge of the disease's biology and develop clinical trials that use novel systemic agents. This narrative review synthesizes relevant publications retrieved from PubMed. Our aim is to discuss current approaches in the management of PSCC, summarize ongoing efforts to improve care, and identify future areas for enhancing our understanding of the disease.

Expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) from penile cancer patients

Penile cancer is a rare but highly lethal cancer, and therapeutic options for patients presenting with lymph nodal disease are very limited. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was shown to provide durable objective response in patients with metastatic melanoma and TIL have been expanded from solid tumors at rates between 70 and 90% depending on the specific diagnosis. We evaluated whether TIL could be expanded from surgical specimens of patients with penile cancer. Tumor samples from metastatic lymph nodes obtained at the time of inguinal lymph node dissection were collected, minced into fragments, placed in individual wells of a 24-well plate, and propagated in high dose IL-2 for four weeks. The phenotype of expanded TILs was assessed by flow cytometry and their anti-tumor reactivity was assessed by IFN-γ ELISA. TIL were expanded from 11 out of 12 (91.6%) samples of metastatic lymph nodes. Expanded TIL were predominantly CD3⁺ (mean 67.5%, SD 19.4%) with a mean of 46.8% CD8⁺ T cells (SD 21.1%). Five out of 11 samples (45.4%) from expanded TIL secreted IFN-γ in response to autologous tumor. TIL expansion and phenotype of expanded T cell lymphocytes were independent of previous HPV infection and treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This is the first report demonstrating successful expansion of tumor-reactive TIL from penile cancer patients, which support development of ACT strategies using TIL for the treatment of advanced and recurrent penile cancer.

Prognostic Factors in Penile Cancer: Should We Avoid Inguinal Lymph Node Staging?

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer (PC) is a rare neoplasm, mostly in developed countries. Herewith, we evaluate the main prognostic factors of patients with PC undergoing surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors of overall survival in 65 patients with PC treated at a tertiary referral center over the last 15 years (2004-2018).

RESULTS

Almost half (48%) of the patients were diagnosed at an advanced local stage pT3/4. Thirty-eight (58%) patients underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, and 25 (66%) were negative for lymph node (LN) invasion. Overall survival was 80% at a median follow-up of 31 months. In the multivariate analysis, the main factors of poor prognosis were nodal staging (pN) (p = 0.008) and perineural invasion (p = 0.023). The presence of LN metastasis and perineural invasion in the primary tumor increased the risk of death by 29 (hazard ratio 29.0, 95% confidence interval 2.4-354.2) and 13 (hazard ratio 12.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-112.0) times, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Late diagnosis of PC has a negative impact on overall survival, as nodal invasion correlates with survival. Despite the high number of negative inguinal lymphadenectomy, we continue to advocate aggressive surgical treatment of this disease due to the poor prognosis associated with LN metastasis.

Penile cancer

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare cancer with orphan disease designation and a prevalence of 0.1-1 per 100,000 men in high-income countries, but it constitutes up to 10% of malignancies in men in some African, Asian and South American regions. Risk factors for PSCC include the absence of childhood circumcision, phimosis, chronic inflammation, poor penile hygiene, smoking, immunosuppression and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Several different subtypes of HPV-related and non-HPV-related penile cancers have been described, which also have different prognostic profiles. Localized disease can be effectively managed by topical therapy, surgery or radiotherapy. As PSCC is characterized by early lymphatic spread and imaging is inadequate for the detection of micrometastatic disease, correct and upfront surgical staging of the inguinal lymph nodes is crucial in disease management. Advanced stages of disease require multimodal management. Optimal sequencing of treatments and patient selection are still being investigated. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of systemic therapy for advanced PSCC, but they have poor and non-durable responses and high rates of toxic effects, indicating a need for the development of more effective and less toxic therapeutic options. Localized and advanced penile cancers and their treatment have profound physical and psychosexual effects on the quality of life of patients and survivors by altering sexual and urinary function and causing lymphoedema.

Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most current literature on how the treatment for penile cancer can affect quality of life and to discuss current treatment options to overcome sexual dysfunction and ultimately improve patient wellbeing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist to address the high incidence of sexual dysfunction following penile cancer treatment. Advancements and refinements in the neophalloplasty, penile prosthesis, and penile lengthening procedures have opened the door to improved long-term outcomes. Additionally, studies continue to highlight the severe psychological toll that penile cancer treatment can have on patients. We explore the potential options for addressing the inherent psychologic effects of these treatments and highlight the need for further research in this domain. Although rare, it is important for all urologists to be familiar with the treatments and post-treatment sequelae of penile cancer. Penile cancer is associated with dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist that addresses these concerns. Additionally, urologists must also be mindful of the psychologic component regarding surgical disfigurement and the decline in sexual function.

Oncological therapy to Swedish men with metastatic penile cancer 2000-2015

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer is an uncommon disease with poor prognosis when spread to more than one inguinal lymph node. Recommendations on chemo- and radiotherapy in treatment guidelines are based on low-grade evidence. There are to our knowledge no described population-based cohort with detailed information on given oncological treatment and survival data. The aim of this study is to investigate in detail how men with metastatic penile cancer have been treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy over time, and how survival varies with N-stage and given treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this observational cohort study all men in Sweden diagnosed with penile cancer with lymph node- or distant metastases 2000-2015 were identified through the Swedish National Penile Cancer Register (NPECR). Medical records were retrieved and 325 men were confirmed to have metastatic penile cancer (T_any, c or pN1-3 and/or M1). Information on treatments was collected. Causes of death were retrieved from the National Cause of Death Register (CDR).

RESULTS

Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were given to 172 (53%) of all men. The use of oncological treatments with curative intent increased significantly during the study period, from 30% of men with c/pN2-3 diagnosed 2000-2003 compared with 57% of men diagnosed 2012-2015. Ninety-three (29%) men received oncological treatments with curative intent of whom 85/93 (91%) had stage c/pN2-3M0. Survival decreased with higher N-stage, M1-stage, and absence of oncological treatment with curative intent. For men with c/pN3-stage, the engagement of pelvic lymph nodes was entailed with lower survival than pN3 based on extra-nodal extension (ENE).

CONCLUSION

The use of oncological treatment was below recommendations in guidelines but increased during the study period. Treatment was given predominantly to men with c/pN2-3 and M1-disease. Survival was higher among men treated with curative intent; this could be due to patient selection bias.

Molecular stratification by BCL2A1 and AIM2 provides additional prognostic value in penile squamous cell carcinoma

Background: Lymph node metastasis is the most unfavorable prognostic factor of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). However, patients with the same lymph node status have different outcomes, and molecular classifiers for precise prognostic assessments are lacking.

Methods: Comprehensive genomic profiling and high-content proliferation screening were performed in eight PSCC and normal tissue pairs and in cell lines. BCL2A1 and AIM2 were selected and further evaluated by qPCR and Western blot. The clinical relevance and prognostic value of the target genes were validated via immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 220 PSCC patients with a defined pN stage. Finally, the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of BCL2A1 and AIM2 were investigated in vitro and in vivo.

Results: BCL2A1 and AIM2 were both upregulated in PSCC tissues and associated mostly with cell proliferation. Staining for either BCL2A1 or AIM2 revealed that both are correlated with pN status, extranodal extension, clinical stage and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Compared to patients who are single-positive or double-negative for BCL2A1 and AIM2, those overexpressing both genes had a higher risk of tumor progression and the poorest survival in the pN0 (5-year CSS: 63.3% vs. 94.9% and 100.0%, respectively, p = 0.000) and pN+ subsets (5-year CSS: 24.1% vs. 45.7% and 55.1%, respectively, p = 0.035). Molecular biofunction and mechanistic studies demonstrated that BCL2A1 and AIM2 knockdown inhibited tumorigenesis via the AIM2/NF-κB/BCL2A1/MAPK/c-Myc signaling pathway.

Conclusions: BCL2A1 and AIM2 promote PSCC progression. Integrating BCL2A1 and AIM2 as novel molecular classifiers with pN stage provides additional information for the prognosis and treatment of PSCC patients.

Association Between Human Papillomavirus Infection and Outcome of Perioperative Nodal Radiotherapy for Penile Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Data on the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection status and outcomes for perioperative treatments for patients with lymph node-involved penile squamous-cell carcinoma (PSCC) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the benefit from perioperative radiotherapy (RT) for PSCC according to HPV infection status.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In an international multicenter database of 1254 patients with PSCC who received inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND), 507 had suitable clinical information.

INTERVENTION

ILND, with or without chemotherapy or RT for involved lymph nodes.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analyses for overall survival (OS) were performed for all patients and after propensity score-matching (PSM; n = 136), for which patient age, histology, type of penile surgical procedure, pathological tumor and nodal stage, ILND laterality, pelvic LND, and perioperative treatment were taken into account when assessing differences between HPV⁺ and HPV- patients. Finally, we looked at genomic alterations in PSCC using data from the Foundation Medicine database (n = 199) to characterize HPV⁺ PSCC.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Patients with HPV⁺ PSCC (n = 86; 17%) had lower clinical N stage (p < 0.001) and inguinal lymph node metastasis density (p < 0.001). Perioperative RT was delivered in 49 patients (9.7%), with the vast majority receiving adjuvant RT (n = 40). HPV⁺ patients had similar median OS (p = 0.1) but longer RMST than HPV- patients at different time points. Nevertheless, HPV⁺ patients treated with perioperative RT exhibited longer median OS (p = 0.015) and longer RMST compared to HPV- patients. In the PSM cohorts, HPV⁺ status remained significantly associated with longer OS after RT. The HPV- PSCC group had a higher frequency of TP53 mutations compared to HPV⁺ PSCC (75% vs 15%; p < 0.001). The results are limited by the retrospective nature of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative RT was more effective in the HPV⁺ PSCC subgroup. Reasons for the enhanced radiosensitivity may be related to the lack of TP53 mutations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We analyzed data from a large multicenter database for patients with penile cancer who had received inguinal lymph node dissection, with or without chemotherapy or radiotherapy. We found that for tumors positive for human papillomavirus (HPV), use of radiotherapy resulted in prolonged survival compared to HPV-negative tumors. On the basis of these results we are inspired to design studies on the use of radiotherapy in HPV-selected patients.

An update on systemic therapy for penile cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Whereas substantial advances have been made in systemic tumour therapy in the past decade, the prognosis of advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis remains disproportionally poor. In this review, we aimed to present an update on systemic therapy of penile SCC highlighting the most recent data and future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lymph node metastases play a key role in treating and assessing the prognosis of patients with penile SCC. Data show longer overall survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pelvic lymph node metastases and recent analyses lead to the development of a nomogramm predicting overall survival in connection with the use of perioperative chemotherapy. There are two pathways in the pathogenesis of penile cancer, including human papilloma virus related and unrelated, leading to many possible novel therapeutic targets. Other targeted therapies have been evaluated, which show promising results with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Chemotherapy has shown moderate activity in advanced stages of the disease, however, the ideal timing of chemotherapy in patients with lymph node metastases is not entirely clear. Potential targets for future therapies exist, and are already being tested in other malignancies. Owing to the rarity of this condition, a robust evidence is lacking and it is of great importance to pursue further research to unveil several aspects of this disease, particularly in patients with recurrence, lymph node metastases or metastatic disease.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive penile cancer: current evidence and knowledge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the latest in penile cancer treatment focusing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with regional lymph node involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with regional lymph node involvement from penile cancer still suffer from a poor prognosis, and the chances to achieve cure are primarily dependent on the extent of the disease. Despite multiple lines of research are indicating the need for a multimodal management of the disease upfront, the search for newer effective systemic therapies is ongoing. The available guidelines currently suggest the use of combination chemotherapy regimens including taxanes and cisplatin as induction therapy before lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced disease (i.e., fixed or bulky inguinal lymph nodes or pelvic lymph node involvement). Research in the field will aim to provide more effective systemic therapies also in patients with a more limited disease spread to further improve the outcomes. Data from the literature also indicate the possibility to effectively administer postoperative chemotherapy in selected high-risk patients.

SUMMARY

We aimed to provide the evidence from the literature and the new avenues that would help delineating the optimal therapeutic pathway for these complex patients, commenting on the new opportunities that may come from the ongoing research.

A risk calculator predicting recurrence in lymph node metastatic penile cancer

OBJECTIVES

To develop and externally validate a risk calculator for prediction of any cancer recurrence in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) and inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM), as to date no validated prognostic tool is available for patients with pSCC and ILNM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The development cohort included 234 patients from seven referral centres. The external validation cohort included 273 patients from two additional referral centres. Cox regression identified predictors of any recurrence, which were used to develop a risk calculator. The risk-calculator grouped the development and the validation cohorts according to the individual risk of any recurrence at 24 months (24m-R). Adjuvant treatment effects were tested on overall survival (OS) according to the derived tertiles, within the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Positive surgical margins, pN₃ , and ILNM ratio were associated with higher recurrence rate. The 2-year OS rates were lower for patients with high (>37%) and intermediate (19-37%) compared to low (<19%) 24m-R risk of recurrence, for both the development (43% and 58% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (44% and 50% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), but not in patients who did receive adjuvant treatments in both the development and validation cohorts (P > 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant treatment planning is crucial in patients with pSCC with ILNM, where only weak evidence is available. The current tool proved to successfully stratify patients according to their individual risk, potentially allowing better tailoring of adjuvant treatments.

A Lack of Palliative Therapy Use in Patients With Advanced Penile Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Advanced penile cancer is associated with a poor prognosis; therefore, providing patients with realistic expectations, addressing goals of care and offering palliative therapy when appropriate is critical. Our goal was to investigate the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and analyze the role and trends in use of palliative therapy in patients with advanced penile cancer.

METHODS

The NCDB 2004-2015 penile cancer data set was queried for patients with locally advanced, defined as cT4NanyM0 and cTanyN3M0, or metastatic disease regardless of tumor or nodal stage. Patients were categorized based on whether they did or did not receive palliative care. Palliative care was cataloged as pain management therapy, surgery, radiation or systemic treatment, any combination therapy or not otherwise specified (NOS). Our primary outcome was receiving palliative therapy. Secondary outcome was the temporal trends in palliative care. Logistic regression (LR) was performed.

RESULTS OBTAINED

385 and 279 patients were identified with locally advanced and metastatic penile cancer respectively. 27 (7.1%) and 49 (17.6%) patients received palliative care. Average age of patients accepting palliative care was 61.9 years old, about 5 years younger than their counterparts who declined therapy (p < 0.011) in the metastatic cohort. Other patient specific demographics and clinical tumor characteristics were not significantly different in either population. Of patients with locally advanced disease pursuing palliative therapy, radiation (29.6%), surgery (14.8%), systemic treatment (14.8%) and combination treatment (22.2%) were the more popular choices. In the metastatic population, radiation (32.7%) and systemic therapy (24.5%) were the most prevalent choices for palliative treatment followed by combination treatment (16.3%), surgery (12.2%), pain management (10.2%), or NOS (4.1%). LR for the receipt of "any palliative therapy" revealed that increasing age (OR 0.971, p = 0.032) decreased the likelihood of accepting palliative therapy in the metastatic population but not in the locally advanced group. Charlson score of 2 (OR 5.966, p = 0.025) and low income (OR 3.968, p = 0.002) predicted receipt of palliative therapy in the locally advanced group. In patients with metastatic disease, African-American race (OR 2.502, p = 0.025), Charlson score 1 (2.175, p = 0.047) and 3+ (5.386, p = 0.020) predicted an increased predilection for receiving palliative therapy. Interestingly, no statistically significant difference in mortality was noted in either cohort. No significant increase in the trend of palliative care administration was seen in locally advanced and metastatic penile cancer between 2004 to 2015 (p = 0.078 and p = 0.942, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Locally advanced and metastatic penile cancer carry a high mortality rate yet only 11.4% of all patients studied received palliative care. Its use is more common in younger patients, those with co-morbidities and/or those of black race in the metastatic group. Locally advanced patients with low income or comorbidities were also more likely to opt for palliative therapy. Receipt of palliative care did not affect mortality. No increase in frequency of palliative therapy was seen, suggesting much improvement needs to be done in adopting and implementing palliative care in this patient population.

Conditional survival after surgery for patients with penile cancer

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer represents a rare pathology whose natural history of treatment is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the dynamic survival profiles in surgically treated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP) using the conditional survival (CS) estimates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic SCCP were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Conditional 3-yr overall survival (OS) rate and 3-yr cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate represented the primary outcomes of interest and were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The multivariable Cox regression model was employed to calculate proportional hazard ratios for the prediction of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1887 SCCP patients who had undergone surgeries were identified. Given a 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-yr survivorship, the 3-yr OS rates were, respectively, improved by + 9.8 (72.6%), +18.2 (78.1%), +23.4 (81.6%), +27.8 (84.5%), and + 26.6% (83.7%) from those calculated at baseline (time zero). As compared with the baseline calculations, patients who had survived 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 yr after surgery could, respectively, harvest a + 7.8 (84.7%), +14.8 (90.2%), +19.5 (93.9%), +22.1 (96.0%), and + 22.4% (96.2%) improvement in 3-yr CSS. Patients with the most aggressive disease at baseline ultimately benefited the most from event-free survivorship. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the impact of adverse pathological parameters (G2-3, ≥ pT2, pN+) on OS and CSS mostly showed a decreasing trend over time and some could disappear after a minimum of 1-yr survivorship.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The survival probability of SCCP patients increases with post-operative survival. Patients with aggressive disease at baseline ultimately benefit the most from event-free survivorship and may expect a better prognosis once they survive the critical few years after surgery. The recorded observations have crucial implications regarding patient counseling and follow-up.

Association of KRAS mutation with tumor deposit status and overall survival of colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To examine associations of KRAS mutation with tumor deposit status and overall survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with incidental CRC diagnosed during 2010-2014 and recorded statuses of KRAS and tumor deposit in the National Cancer Database of the USA. Multivariable logistic regression and time-varying Cox regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

We included 45,761 CRC patients with KRAS status (24,027 [52.5%] men, 24,240 [53.0%] < 65 years old, 17,338 [37.9%] with KRAS mutation). Adjusted for microsatellite instability, age, pathologic stage and tumor grade, KRAS mutation (versus wild type) was associated with tumor deposit presence (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). KRAS mutation was also linked to worse overall survival of CRC patients regardless of tumor deposit status (adjusted Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.33 for CRC with tumor deposits, and adjusted HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35 or CRC without) or tumor stage (adjusted HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.54 for early-stage and adjusted HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.27 for late-stage). Microsatellite instability was associated with better overall survival in CRC without tumor deposit (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99), but not in CRC with tumor deposit (adjusted HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.30).

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation is independently associated with tumor deposit presence and a worse overall survival in CRC patients.

Local management of preinvasive and clinical T1-3 penile cancer: utilization of diverse treatment modalities

Aim: To explore management trends in preinvasive and cT1–T3 penile cancer. Materials & methods: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004–2013) for cT1–T3 M0 penile cancer with specified nonpalliative surgical techniques and histologies (n = 5,728). Results: Local excision (39%) and partial penectomy (38%) were most commonly utilized. Patients with cTis/Ta or cT1 disease more often received nonpenectomy approaches (p < 0.05); cT2–T3 cases more likely underwent penectomy (p < 0.001). No survival differences were observed between penectomy (49.3 months) and nonpenectomy approaches (50.3 months) in the overall cohort (p = 0.107) and when stratifying by T-stage (p > 0.20 for all). Conclusion: This study provides contemporary insight into the landscape for management of this rare disease and can serve as a benchmark for future evaluation of treatment trends.

Adjuvant radiation compares favorably to chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma penis and nodal positivity restricted to groin

OBJECTIVES

To compare overall survival (OS) between adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CCRT) postsurgery for node-positive patients with carcinoma penis.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained registry for 45 patients receiving adjuvant treatment following lymph node dissection from 2011 to 2017, having minimum 6 months follow-up and more than 2 positive inguinal nodes was analyzed. Patients without pelvic nodal positivity (n= 32) were treated by radiotherapy (RT) (n = 25) or chemotherapy (n = 7); CCRT (n = 6) or chemotherapy (n = 7) was used in patients with positive pelvic nodes (n = 13). Data was collected for age, comorbidities, body mass index, tobacco exposure, treatment modality, tumor grade, pathological T and N stage, and extra-nodal extension. OS was compared between different treatment modalities stratifying patients with and without pelvic nodal positivity. Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis was used to narrow down remaining variables and Inverse Probability Treatment Weights modeling was used to determine average treatment effect.

RESULTS

About 12 of 14 patients in the chemotherapy group received both cisplatin and paclitaxel. Pathological T stage, N stage and extra-nodal extension had significant association with OS on multivariate analysis. Among patients with nodal positivity restricted to groin the estimated average OS when all patients received adjuvant RT was 1,438 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 1,256-1,619 days, Pvalue <0.0001). The estimated average OS if all patients received chemotherapy was lower by 1,007 days (95% CI 810-1,202 days, P value <0.0001). Among patients with positive pelvic nodes the estimated average OS when all patients received adjuvant CCRT was 467 days (95% CI 368-566 days, P value <0.0001). The estimated average OS difference if all patients received chemotherapy was 17 days (95% CI -144 to 178 days, Pvalue 0.21).

CONCLUSION

In patients with nodal positivity limited to groin, adjuvant RT proved superior to chemotherapy. Among patients with pelvic nodal positivity, CCRT offers no significant OS advantage over combination chemotherapy.

Characteristics of penile cancer in Japan: An analysis of nationwide hospital-based cancer registry data

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with penile cancer in Japan using the nationwide hospital-based cancer registry database.

METHODS

Using hospital-based cancer registry data, we described the distribution of age, pathology, tumor-node-metastases classification, and first-course treatment in patients treated between 2012 and 2015. We compared the patterns of first-line treatment between elderly and non-elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1012 patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma among 1773 patients with penile tumors who registered under topography code C60. The median age at diagnosis was 74 years, and 85.9% of patients were aged >60 years. The most common pathology was usual-type squamous cell carcinoma (91.9%), followed by verrucous carcinoma (5.0%), sarcomatoid carcinoma (1.1%), papillary carcinoma (0.7%), basaloid carcinoma (0.6%), adenosquamous carcinoma (0.4%), warty carcinoma (0.2%) and mixed carcinoma (0.1%). A total of 61.3% of patients were diagnosed with localized disease. In contrast, the proportions of patients with lymph node and distant metastases were 27.5% and 2.1% at diagnosis, respectively. The proportion of patients who were treated with chemotherapy as the first-course treatment was significantly lower among elderly patients (≥80 years) with clinical stage III (27.6% vs 7.1%, P = 0.0312) and clinical stage IV (53.2% vs 14.3%, P = 0.0086).

CONCLUSIONS

Most penile cancer patients in Japan are diagnosed with usual-type squamous cell carcinoma, and those with human papilloma virus-related squamous cell carcinomas are <1%. Chemotherapy for advanced penile cancer is administered less in Japanese elderly (≥80 years) patients.

Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) on survival outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 532 patients who underwent inguinal LN dissection (ILND) across tertiary referral centres from Europe, China, Brazil and North America were retrospectively evaluated. From this cohort, 198 patients received pelvic LND (PLND).We identified threshold values for ILND and PLND using receiver operating characteristic curves. We tested prognostic value of LNY for recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meir method and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile [IQR]) age was 59 (49-68) years and the median (IQR) follow-up after ILND was 28 (12-68.2) months. Overall, 85% of the patients had bilateral dissections. The median (IQR) number of inguinal LNs removed was 15 (10-22). Of those receiving PLND, The median (IQR) number of LNs was 13 (8-19). A LNY of ≥15 was used for dichotomisation of ILND patients, and a LNY of ≥9 was used in the PLND cohort. Patients with a LNY ≥15 had significantly better 5-year OS vs patients with a LNY <15 (70.1% vs 58.7%). On multivariable analyses, a LNY ≥15 was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, P = 0.029). For cN0 patients, a LNY ≥15 was an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.52, P = 0.043) and OS (HR 0.53, P = 0.021). In the PLND cohort, a LNY ≥9 was a predictor of RFS (HR 0.53, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Using one of the largest LND datasets to date, we found LNY to be a significant predictor of outcomes after lymphatic staging for penile SCC. Prospective validation is warranted.

Nomogram-based prediction of overall survival after regional lymph node dissection and the role of perioperative chemotherapy in penile squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To improve the prognostic allocation of patients with penile squamous-cell carcinoma (PSCC) receiving regional lymph node dissection (LND).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An international, multicenter, retrospective study was performed on patients with PSCC who received regional LND, with or without perioperative therapy, from 1980 to 2017. We first used a random forest (RF) method with missing data imputation. Additionally, data were modeled using Cox proportional hazard regression, and a Cox model was also fit including prespecified variables. Based on the latter model, a nomogram for estimating 12-month and 24-month overall survival (OS) was developed.

RESULTS

There were 743 patients who received LND at 7 referral centers from Europe, the USA, Brazil, and China. Of these patients, 689 were analyzed: 86 (12.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); 171 (24.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 74 (10.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. The variables significantly associated with OS were age (P < 0.001), the pathologically involved/total removed LN ratio (P < 0.001), pN stage (overall P < 0.001), and NAC (P = 0.013). NAC and AC were ineffective in N1-2 patients (clinical and pathological, respectively), whereas they provided OS improvements in N3 patients. Finally, we developed a nomogram predicting 12- and 24-month OS based on prespecified variables (c-index: 0.75). The study is limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a tool that can be offered as an aid to physicians to enhance decision-making, clinical research, and patient counseling whenever LND is needed for PSCC. Administration of NAC and AC should be restricted to clinical and pathological N3 patients, respectively.

Long-term outcomes for penile cancer patients presenting with advanced N3 disease requiring a myocutaneous flap reconstruction or primary closure-a retrospective single centre study

Background

Penile cancer patients with advanced metastatic disease in the inguinal region present a therapeutic challenge. We compared the outcomes for patients with advanced inguinal node disease requiring myocutaneous flap reconstruction (MFR) against primary closure for N3 disease.

Methods

A retrospective comparative study of a consecutive cohort of advanced penile cancer patients with N3 disease was performed. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, primary tumour site, stage and grade were recorded. The type of MFR used, patient outcomes and post-operative complications were recorded from an institutional database. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were calculated to analyse the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates for the MFR group and compared with the no-MFR group. P values were calculated by log-rank and Chi square tests for CSS rates and complications respectively.

Results

Eighteen patients requiring MFR were identified; mean age 62 years. Ten (55.6%) patients had a first presentation with penile cancer and advanced nodal disease with the remaining 8 (44.4%) presenting with an inguinal recurrence having already undergone surgery. The majority (n=15) underwent a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. The average length of stay was 23 days for the MFR group versus 8.5 days for the no-MFR group. The 5-year CSS was 20.9% for the MFR group and 39.8% for the no-MFR group (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Aggressive surgical management for patients with extensive nodal disease and flap reconstruction is feasible and aids wound management although the long-term prognosis is still poor.

Important Therapeutic Considerations in T1b Penile Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Adherence to Treatment Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications and contemporary management of T1b penile cancer are unknown. National treatment guidelines advocate surgical lymph node examination (SLNE) for T1b disease.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of T1b disease and adherence to corresponding treatment guidelines.

METHODS

We analyzed 296 patients from two academic centers, and 1263 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (median follow-up 48.3 and 21 months, respectively). Multivariate Cox and Fine-Gray regressions were applied for penile cancer-specific survival (PCSS) analyses.

RESULTS

In the academic center cohort, 28.3% of T1 patients had T1b disease, all of whom underwent SLNE. Nodal metastases were detected in 86.7% of T1b patients and 13.2% of T1a patients (p < 0.001). Using T1a as a reference, PCSS was significantly poorer in the T1b patients, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 4.10 (p = 0.03). In the SEER cohort, 16.8% of T1 patients were classified as T1b. SLNE was performed in 21.7% of the T1b patients versus 38.2% of the T2 patients (p = 0.002). The probability of nodal metastases was 2.23-fold higher in T1b patients than in T1a patients (p < 0.001). In clinical N0M0 patients without SLNE, compared with T1a disease, T1b was associated with an aHR of 4.40 and a subdistribution HR of 4.53 for PCSS (both p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

T1b penile cancer is strongly associated with nodal metastases and adverse PCSS, and is poorly managed according to guidelines recommended in the nationwide registry.

Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer translates into better outcomes: a multicenter international study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate adherence to the EAU guidelines (GL) on penile cancer (PC) with regard to primary surgical treatment and management of lymph nodes and to estimate the influence of adherence to GL on clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 12 European and American centers between 2010 and 2016. Adherence to the EAU GL on the surgical management of the primary penile tumor and lymphadenectomy was evaluated. Descriptive analyses were performed, and survival curves were estimated.

RESULTS

Data on 425 patients were considered for the analysis. The EAU GL on surgical treatment of the primary tumor and lymphadenectomy were respected in 74.8% and 73.7% of cases, respectively. Survival analysis showed that adherence to the GL on primary penile surgery was significantly associated with a good overall survival [adjusted HR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.83, p value = 0.014)]. Also, the adherence to the GL on lymphadenectomy was statistically significantly associated with overall survival [adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.96, p value = 0.038)]. Limited follow-up and retrospective design represent limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there is a good adherence to the EAU GL on PC. However, this should be further reinforced, endorsed and encouraged as it might translate into better clinical outcomes for PC patients.

Current controversies and developments on the role of lymphadenectomy for penile cancer

Penile squamous cell carcinoma is a rare cancer in men. The main prognosticators of survival for penile cancer patients remain the presence and the extent of lymph node metastasis. While radical inguinal lymphadenectomy has been the cornerstone of regional lymph node management for many years, it is still associated with significant morbidity and psychological distress. Recent developments in penile squamous cell carcinoma management have been met with some controversy in the urologic oncology community. Herein, we review the current controversies and developments on the role of inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.

New insight in penile cancer

Penile cancer is a rare disease. Most of penile cancer are squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnosis is based on self-examination, clinical examination and confirmatory biopsy. Several imaging techniques could be used for staging purposes. However, the best modality for staging in intermediate and high-risk patients is by surgical evaluation and the use of inguinal lymph node dissection, that has also a therapeutic effect. Unfortunately, inguinal lymph node dissection is underused. Penile cancer treatment may have a major adverse impact on urinary and sexual function and on quality of life. Penile-sparing surgery and radiation therapies are available, and in selected patients offer good outcomes with acceptable rates of local recurrence. Penile-sparing surgery should be preferred when indicated. Follow-up with periodical controls is mandatory up to 5 years. However, risk of local, nodal and distant recurrence after 5 years was reported. Imaging is not routinely recommended during follow-up. Patients should be trained to self-examination during the follow-up.