Assessment of Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy as Adjuvant or Salvage Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Deep learning based clinical target volumes contouring for prostate cancer: Easy and efficient application

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy has been crucial in prostate cancer treatment. However, manual segmentation is labor intensive and highly variable among radiation oncologists. In this study, a deep learning based automated contouring model is constructed for clinical target volumes (CTVs) of intact and postoperative prostate cancer.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) data sets of 197 prostate cancer patients were collected. Two auto-delineation models were built for radical radiotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy of prostate cancer respectively, and each model included CTVn for pelvic lymph nodes and CTVp for prostate tumors or prostate tumor beds.

RESULTS

In the radical radiotherapy model, the volumetric dice (VD) coefficient of CTVn calculated by AI, was higher than that of the one delineated by the junior physicians (0.85 vs. 0.82, p = 0.018); In the postoperative radiotherapy model, the quantitative parameter of CTVn and CTVp, counted by AI, was better than that of the junior physicians. The median delineation time for AI was 0.23 min in the postoperative model and 0.26 min in the radical model, which were significantly shorter than those of the physicians (50.40 and 45.43 min, respectively, p < 0.001). The correction time of the senior physician for AI was much shorter compared with that for the junior physicians in both models (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using deep learning and attention mechanism, a highly consistent and time-saving contouring model was built for CTVs of pelvic lymph nodes and prostate tumors or prostate tumor beds for prostate cancer, which also might be a good approach to train junior radiation oncologists.

Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

RESULTS

European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.

Novel hormone therapy and coordination of care in high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-50% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing primary definitive treatment. Patients with high-risk BCR have an increased risk of metastatic progression and subsequent PCa-specific mortality, and thus could benefit from treatment intensification. Given the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, multidisciplinary care (MDC) can play a crucial role in the individualized management of this patient population. This review explores the role for MDC when evaluating the clinical evidence for the evolving definition of high-risk BCR and the emerging therapeutic strategies, especially with novel hormone therapies (NHTs), for patients with either high-risk BCR or oligometastatic PCa. Clinical studies have used different characteristics to define high-risk BCR and there is no consensus regarding the definition of high-risk BCR nor for management strategies. Next-generation imaging and multigene panels offer potential enhanced patient identification and precision-based decision-making, respectively. Treatment intensification with NHTs, either alone or combined with radiotherapy or metastasis-directed therapy, has been promising in clinical trials in patients with high-risk BCR or oligometastases. As novel risk-stratification and treatment options as well as evidence-based literature evolve, it is important to involve a multidisciplinary team to identify patients with high-risk features at an earlier stage, and make informed decisions on the treatments that could optimize their care and long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, MDC data are scarce in the BCR or oligometastatic setting. Efforts to integrate MDC into the standard management of this patient population are needed, and will likely improve outcomes across this heterogeneous PCa patient population.

Association of radiotherapy for prostate cancer and second primary colorectal cancer: a US population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is a common treatment for prostate cancer, yet the risk of second primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC) in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RT has not been adequately studied.

METHODS

This study employed a population-based cohort design using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify individuals diagnosed between January 1975 and December 2015. The cumulative incidence of SPCRC was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk regression. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the risk associated with RT. Survival outcomes of patients with SPCRC were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 287,607 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were identified. The cumulative incidences were higher in patients who did not receive RT (2.00%) compared to those who underwent RT (2.47%) after 25 years. After adjustment for multiple variables, RT was associated with an increased risk of developing combined SPCRC (adjusted HR 1.590). Additionally, the overall survival was significantly lower in patients who developed colorectal cancer after receiving RT as compared to those who did not receive RT.

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore the need for diligent long-term monitoring and effective management strategies to detect SPCRC in patients treated with RT for prostate cancer.

Salvage prostate bed plus elective pelvic node radiation without androgen deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCA) after radical prostatectomy (RP), there is limited data on the effectiveness of adding elective pelvic nodal radiation (EPNI) to salvage prostate bed radiation (PBRT) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to prevent progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 326 patients treated for BCR of PCA from a single institution was performed to capture baseline pre-operative PSA, pathologic details, post-operative PSA, treatment details (radiation and ADT), subsequent failure (rising PSA), response to radiation, and subsequent outcomes after radiation.

RESULTS

Between 2004 through 2017, 326 patients received PBRT. Majority (n = 253; 78%) did not receive ADT. Majority received EPNI (n = 227; 90%) with salvage PBRT (n = 213; 94%). The median pre-PBRT PSA was 0.50 ng/ml (0.10-75.60 ng/ml). Of the patients that did not receive ADT, 83% (210/253) achieved an undetectable (< 0.2 ng/ml) PSA after salvage PBRT. After a median follow-up of 87 months, 172 (53%) patients were without a rising PSA and 50 (15%) developed metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes with salvage PBRT plus EPNI without ADT appear comparable to salvage PBRT plus EPNI plus ADT. These results need confirmation in a randomized setting.

Investigating the Benefit of Combined Androgen Modulation and Hypofractionation in Prostate Cancer

Hypofractionation is currently considered a valid alternative to conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with organ-confined prostate cancer. Recent data have demonstrated that extreme hypofractionation, which involves the use of a high radiation dose per delivered fraction and concomitant reduction of sessions, is a safe and effective treatment, even though its radiobiological rationale is still lacking. The present work aims to investigate the biological basis sustaining this approach and to evaluate the potential of a hypofractionated regimen in combination with androgen deprivation therapy, one of the major standards of care for prostate cancer. Findings show that androgen receptor (AR) modulation, by use of androgens and antiandrogens, has a significant impact on cell survival, especially in hypoxic conditions (4% O₂). Subsequent experiments have revealed that AR activity as a transcription factor is involved in the onset of malignant senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and activation of DNA repair cascade. In particular, we found that AR stimulation in hypoxic conditions promotes the enhanced transcription of ATM gene, the cornerstone kinase of the DNA damage repair genes. Together, these data provide new potential insights to justify the use of androgen deprivation therapy, in particular with second-generation anti-androgens such as enzalutamide, in combination with radiotherapy.