1
|
Ding P, Wu J, Wu H, Li T, Yang J, Yang L, Guo H, Tian Y, Yang P, Meng L, Zhao Q. Myosteatosis predicts postoperative complications and long-term survival in robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score analysis. Eur J Clin Invest 2024; 54:e14201. [PMID: 38533747 DOI: 10.1111/eci.14201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic gastrectomy is increasingly utilized for gastric cancer, but high morbidity remains a concern. Myosteatosis or low skeletal muscle density reflecting fatty infiltration, associates with complications after other cancer surgeries but has not been evaluated for robotic gastrectomy. METHODS This retrospective study analysed 381 patients undergoing robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer from September 2019 to October 2022. Myosteatosis was quantified on preoperative computed tomography (CT) images at lumbar 3 (L3). Propensity score matching addressed potential confounding between myosteatosis and non-myosteatosis groups. Outcomes were postoperative complications, 30 days mortality, 30 days readmissions and survival. RESULTS Myosteatosis was present in 33.6% of patients. Myosteatosis associated with increased overall (47.7% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.001) and severe complications (12.4% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). After matching, myosteatosis remained associated with increased overall complications, major complications, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and readmission (all p < 0.05). Myosteatosis independently predicted overall [odds ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-5.20, p = 0.001] and severe complications (OR = 4.81, 95% CI: 1.51-15.27, p = 0.008). Myosteatosis also associated with reduced overall (85.0% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.015) and disease-free survival (80.3% vs. 88.4%, p=0.029). On multivariate analysis, myosteatosis independently predicted poorer survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.32-6.08, p=0.012] and disease-free survival (HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.01-3.30, p=0.032). CONCLUSION Preoperative CT-defined myosteatosis independently predicts increased postoperative complications and reduced long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Assessing myosteatosis on staging CT could optimize preoperative risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pingan Ding
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jiaxiang Wu
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Haotian Wu
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Tongkun Li
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jiaxuan Yang
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Li Yang
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
- The Department of CT/MRI, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Honghai Guo
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Peigang Yang
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lingjiao Meng
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
- Research Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qun Zhao
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu CY, Huang QZ, Ye K. Comparison of clinical efficacy between modified Kamikawa anastomosis in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:17181. [PMID: 39060330 PMCID: PMC11282297 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68514-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis and laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 268 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric adenocarcinoma from January 2016 to October 2022 were collected. Among 268 patients, 26 underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis were assigned to Kamikawa group and 242 underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis were assigned to Roux-en-Y group. The sex, age, BMI, preoperative albumin, maximum tumor diameter, histological grade, and pathological stage of patients in the Kamikawa group and the Roux-en-Y group were subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching. After matching, 16 patients in Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group were respectively included in this study. Outcome measures: (1) Intraoperative condition. (2) Postoperative recovery. (3) Follow-up information. The patients' nutritional status, reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stoma were investigated by outpatient and telephone follow-up. Nutritional status assessment comprising body mass index and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score. (1) Intraoperative condition. All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy. Compared with Roux-en-Y group, the digestive tract reconstruction time in Kamikawa group was longer 93.0(74.0-111.0)min vs. 39.7(35.1-46.2)min, t = -2.001, P = 0.055., and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in total operation time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05). (2) Postoperative recovery. There was no statistically significant difference between Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group in first anal exhaust time, first postoperative liquid intake time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). (3) Follow-up information. All patients were followed up. BMI and NRS 2002 scores in Kamikawa group were better than those in Roux-en-Y group at 6 and 12 months after surgery 22.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2 vs. 20.8 ± 2.2 kg/m2, t = 2.165, P = 0.038; 23.1 ± 3.0 kg/m2 vs. 20.3 ± 2.2 kg/m2, t = 3.022, P = 0.005 and 2 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-3), Z = -2.585, P = 0.010; 2 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-3), Z = -2.273, P = 0.023., the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in GERD scale score and occurrence of ≥ Grade B reflux esophagitis at 6 and 12 months after surgery between Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group (P > 0.05). Anastomotic stenosis was not found in all patients by postoperative upper gastrointestinal angiography. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis is safe and feasible for the treatment of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric adenocarcinoma, and can achieve good anti-reflux effect. Besides, compared with traditional laparoscopic total gastrectomy, its postoperative nutritional status is better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chu-Ying Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qiao-Zhen Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China
| | - Kai Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cui H, Yuan Z, Liang W, Cao B, Chen L, Cui J, Wei B. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:606. [PMID: 39009976 PMCID: PMC11251346 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05193-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) in older patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, and efficacy of MIG for older patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy (NICT). METHODS The clinical data of 726 older patients aged over 65 years who underwent upfront MIG or MIG after NICT in the Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center between Jan 2020 and Nov 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis at a ratio of 1:2 was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The baseline characteristics were comparable between 61 patients in the NICT-MIG group and 114 patients in the MIG group after PSM (P > 0.05). The major pathological response (MPR) rate and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were 44.2% and 21.3%, respectively, in the NICT-MIG group. Patients in the NICT-MIG group had longer operation times (P = 0.005) and postoperative days (P = 0.030) than those in the MIG group. No significant differences were found in intraoperative bleeding, number of retrieved lymph nodes, first flatus day, R0 resection rate, overall postoperative complication (POC) morbidity, severe POC morbidity, 2-year overall, and recurrence-free survival between the MIG and NICT-MIG groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that an estimated blood loss > 200 mL (P = 0.010) and a lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) ≤ 3.25 (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for POCs after MIG in older patients. CONCLUSION The safety, and efficacy of NICT-MIG were comparable to those of upfront MIG in older patients with GC. Patients with an estimated blood loss > 200 mL or an LMR ≤ 3.25 should be carefully evaluated for an increased risk of POCs in older patients who undergo MIG. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2400086827).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Cui
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
| | - Zhen Yuan
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
| | - Wenquan Liang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Bo Cao
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Lin Chen
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jianxin Cui
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Bo Wei
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Long VD, Thong DQ, Dat TQ, Nguyen DT, Hai NV, Quoc HLM, Anh NVT, Vuong NL, Bac NH. Risk factors of postoperative complications and their effect on survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:580-594. [PMID: 38957552 PMCID: PMC11216791 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications and evaluate their impact on survival outcomes in patients undergoing LG. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent LG for gastric adenocarcinoma between March 2015 and December 2021. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with major complications defined as Grade III or higher. Logistic regression models with stepwise backward procedure were used to identify risk factors for complications. To assess the impact of postoperative complications on survival, uni- and multi-variable Cox proportional hazard models were used for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Overall rate of postoperative complications was 17.6% (109 patients); 33 patients (5.3%) had major complications. Independent risk factors for major complications were Charlson comorbidities index (OR [95% CI], 1.87 [1.09-3.12], p-value = 0.018 for each one score increase), and type of anastomosis (OR [95% CI], 0.28 [0.09-0.91], p-value = 0.029 when comparing Billroth II with Billroth I). Multivariable analysis identified major complications as an independent prognostic factor to reduce OS (HR [95% CI], 2.32 [1.02-5.30], p-value = 0.045) and DFS (HR [95% CI], 2.63 [1.37-5.06], p-value = 0.004). Other prognostic factors for decreased survival outcomes were tumor size, presence of invasive lymph nodes, and T4a stage. Conclusions Major complications rate of LG for GC was approximately 5.3%. Charlson comorbidities index and type of anastomosis were identified as risk factors for major postoperative complications. Major complications were demonstrated to pose adverse impact on survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vo Duy Long
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Dang Quang Thong
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Tran Quang Dat
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Doan Thuy Nguyen
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Nguyen Viet Hai
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Ho Le Minh Quoc
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Nguyen Lam Vuong
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Public HealthUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| | - Nguyen Hoang Bac
- Gastro‐intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical CenterUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ikoma N. What defines the "value" of robotic surgery for patients with gastrointestinal cancers? Perspectives from a U.S. Cancer Center. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:566-579. [PMID: 38957558 PMCID: PMC11216793 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of robotic surgery has experienced rapid growth across diverse medical conditions, with a notable emphasis on gastrointestinal cancers. The advanced technologies incorporated into robotic surgery platforms have played a pivotal role in enabling the safe performance of complex procedures, including gastrectomy and pancreatectomy, through a minimally invasive approach. However, there exists a noteworthy gap in high-level evidence demonstrating that robotic surgery for gastric and pancreatic cancers has substantial benefits compared to traditional open or laparoscopic methods. The primary impediment hindering the broader implementation of robotic surgery is its cost. The escalating healthcare expenses in the United States have prompted healthcare providers and payors to explore patient-centered, value-based healthcare models and reimbursement systems that embrace cost-effectiveness. Thus, it is important to determine what defines the value of robotic surgery. It must either maintain or enhance oncological quality and improve complication rates compared to open procedures. Moreover, its true value should be apparent in patients' expedited recovery and improved quality of life. Another essential aspect of robotic surgery's value lies in minimizing or even eliminating opioid use, even after major operations, offering considerable benefits to the broader public health landscape. A quicker return to oncological therapy has the potential to improve overall oncological outcomes, while a speedier return to work not only alleviates individual financial distress but also positively impacts societal productivity. In this article, we comprehensively review and summarize the current landscape of health economics and value-based care, with a focus on robotic surgery for gastrointestinal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Serizawa A, Shibasaki S, Nakauchi M, Suzuki K, Akimoto S, Tanaka T, Inaba K, Uyama I, Suda K. Standardized procedure for preventing late intestinal complications following minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4067-4084. [PMID: 38834724 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10929-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is commonly performed, reports regarding late complications are limited. We have made several improvements each time we experienced severe late complications since 2009. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these improved procedures in preventing late complications. METHODS Between January 2009 and December 2019, 302 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: Period-I (2009-2013, before established standardization of procedure, 166 patients) and Period-II (2014-2019, after established standardization of procedure, 136 patients). The standardized procedure comprised four major steps, including closure of the mesentery defects and diaphragm crus, circumferential fixation of the anastomotic site into the diaphragm, and linearization around the anastomotic site of esophagojejunostomy. The incidence of late complications was retrospectively compared between the two groups. RESULTS Late overall complications that occurred over 30 days after surgery were observed in 19 (6.3%) patients. In all, 14 of 24 (58.3%) patients admitted due to late intestinal complications eventually required reoperation for treatment. The most frequent complication was nonstenotic outlet obstruction of the distal jejunal limb. The incidence of late overall complications was significantly lower in Period-II than in Period-I (2.9 vs 9.0%, p = 0.030). Intestinal complications were reduced considerably in Period-II. The 3-year cumulative incidence rate of late overall complications was significantly lower in Period-II than in Period-I (0.03 vs 0.10, p = 0.035). Period-I as the only independent risk factor for the development of late intestinal complications. CONCLUSION Late complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy sometimes occurred, and more than half of the patients with intestinal complications required reoperation. Our standardized procedure was associated with a lower risk of late intestinal complications after minimally invasive total gastrectomy followed by intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using linear staplers in a cohort of patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Serizawa
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Susumu Shibasaki
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Masaya Nakauchi
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Kazumitsu Suzuki
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Shingo Akimoto
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Tanaka
- Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Technology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Kazuki Inaba
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
- Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Technology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Koichi Suda
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
- Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Intelligence, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hu H, Hu L, Li K, Jiang Q, Tan J, Deng Z. Comprehensive assessment of body mass index effects on short-term and long-term outcomes in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13842. [PMID: 38879651 PMCID: PMC11180086 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64459-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/19/2024] Open
Abstract
To examine the influence of Body Mass Index (BMI) on laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) short-term and long-term outcomes for gastric cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on gastric cancer patients undergoing LG at the Third Hospital of Nanchang City from January 2013 to January 2022. Based on WHO BMI standards, patients were categorized into normal weight, overweight, and obese groups. Factors such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and overall survival were assessed. Across different BMI groups, it was found that an increase in BMI was associated with longer operative times (average times: 206.22 min for normal weight, 231.32 min for overweight, and 246.78 min for obese), with no significant differences noted in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, or long-term survival among the groups. The impact of BMI on long-term survival following LG for gastric cancer was found to be insignificant, with no notable differences in survival outcome between different BMI groups. Although higher BMI is associated with increased operative time in LG for gastric cancer, it does not significantly affect intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, recovery, or long-term survival. LG is a feasible treatment choice for obese patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 2, Xiangshan South Road, Xihu District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Lili Hu
- Department of Pediatrics, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 2, Xiangshan South Road, Xi hu District, Nanchang city, China
| | - Kun Li
- Department of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 2, Xiangshan South Road, Xihu District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - QiHua Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 2, Xiangshan South Road, Xi Hu District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
| | - JunTao Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 2, Xiangshan South Road, Xi Hu District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
- Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Breast Diseases, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 1268, Jiuzhou Street, Chaoyang New Town, Xihu District, Nanchang City, China.
| | - ZiQing Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Nanchang, No. 2, Xiangshan South Road, Xihu District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Teh SH, Shiraga S, Kellem AM, Li RA, Le DM, Arsalane SP, Khayat FS, Li Y, Gong IY, Lee JM. A Path to High-Value Gastric Cancer Surgery Care Delivery. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e408. [PMID: 38911627 PMCID: PMC11192013 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a comprehensive regional program, including the Minimally Invasive Recovery and Empowerment Care (MIREC) pathway, that can significantly reduce hospital stays after laparoscopic gastrectomy without increasing adverse events. Background Cost-effectiveness and improving patient outcomes are crucial in providing quality gastric cancer care worldwide. Methods To compare the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery using 2 different models of care within an integrated healthcare system from February 2012 to March 2023. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the need for intensive care unit care, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days after surgery. Results There were 553 patients, 167 in the pre-(February 2012-April 2016) and 386 in the post-MIREC period (May 2016-March 2023). Perioperative chemotherapy utilization increased from 31.7% to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic gastrectomy increased from 17.4% to 97.7% (P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization decreased from 7 to 2 days (P < 0.0001), with 32.1% and 88% of patients discharged home on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2, respectively. When comparing pre- and post-MIREC, intensive care unit utilization (10.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001), ER visits (34.7% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.0002), and readmission (18.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.019) at 30 days were also considerably lower. In addition, more patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (31.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.0001), and the time between gastrectomy and starting adjuvant chemotherapy was also less (49-41 days; P = 0.002). Conclusion This comprehensive regional program, which encompasses regionalization care, laparoscopic approach, modern oncologic care, surgical subspecialization, and the MIREC pathway, can potentially improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes. These benefits include reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates. As such, this program can revolutionize how gastric cancer surgery is delivered, leading to a higher quality of care and increased value to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swee H. Teh
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| | - Sharon Shiraga
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| | - Aaron M. Kellem
- The Permanente Consulting and Information Technology Group, Northern California, CA
| | - Robert A. Li
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| | - David M. Le
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| | - Said P. Arsalane
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| | - Fawzi S. Khayat
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| | - Yan Li
- The Permanente Medical Group, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Northern California, CA
| | - I-Yeh Gong
- The Permanente Medical Group, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Northern California, CA
| | - Jessica M. Lee
- From the The Permanente Medical Group, Gastric Cancer Surgery, Northern California, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang GW, Cheng H, Song XY, Yang YF, Liu H, Ji FH, Peng K. Effect of Oxycodone-Based Multimodal Analgesia on Visceral Pain After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18:1799-1810. [PMID: 38828025 PMCID: PMC11141770 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s464518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Oxycodone is a potent μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist that can relieve both somatic and visceral pain. We assessed oxycodone- vs sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Methods In this randomised double-blind controlled trial, 40 adult patients were randomised (1:1, stratified by type of surgery) to receive oxycodone- or sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia, comprising bilateral transverse abdominis plane blocks, intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion, flurbiprofen axetil, and oxycodone- or sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia. The co-primary outcomes were time-weighted average (TWA) of visceral pain (defined as intra-abdominal deep and dull pain) at rest and on coughing during 0-24 h postoperatively, assessed using the numerical rating scale (0-10) with a minimal clinically important difference of 1. Results All patients completed the study (median age, 64 years; 65% male) and had adequate postoperative pain control. The mean (SD) 24-h TWA of visceral pain at rest was 1.40 (0.77) in the oxycodone group vs 2.00 (0.98) in the sufentanil group (mean difference=-0.60, 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.03; P=0.039). Patients in the oxycodone group had a significantly lower 24-h TWA of visceral pain on coughing (2.00 [0.83] vs 2.98 [1.26]; mean difference=-0.98, 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.30; P=0.006). In the subgroup analyses, the treatment effect of oxycodone vs sufentanil on the co-primary outcomes did not differ in terms of age (18-65 years or >65 years), sex (female or male), or type of surgery (colorectal or gastric). Secondary outcomes (24-h TWA of incisional and shoulder pain, postoperative analgesic usage, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and patient satisfaction) were comparable between groups. Conclusion For patients undergoing major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, oxycodone-based multimodal analgesia reduced postoperative visceral pain in a statistically significant but not clinically important manner. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052085).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Wang Yang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Anaesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yang Song
- Department of Anaesthesiology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu-Fan Yang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Fu-Hai Ji
- Department of Anaesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ke Peng
- Department of Anaesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsekrekos A, Okumura Y, Rouvelas I, Nilsson M. Gastric Cancer Surgery: Balancing Oncological Efficacy against Postoperative Morbidity and Function Detriment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1741. [PMID: 38730693 PMCID: PMC11083646 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in the surgical management of gastric cancer over the years, and previous discrepancies in surgical practice between different parts of the world have gradually lessened. A transition from the earlier period of progressively more extensive surgery to the current trend of a more tailored and evidence-based approach is clear. Prophylactic resection of adjacent anatomical structures or neighboring organs and extensive lymph node dissections that were once assumed to increase the chances of long-term survival are now performed selectively. Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been widely adopted and its indications have steadily expanded, from early cancers located in the distal part of the stomach, to locally advanced tumors where total gastrectomy is required. In parallel, function-preserving surgery has also evolved and now constitutes a valid option for early gastric cancer. Pylorus-preserving and proximal gastrectomy have improved the postoperative quality of life of patients, and sentinel node navigation surgery is being explored as the next step in the process of further refining the minimally invasive concept. Moreover, innovative techniques such as indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and robot-assisted gastrectomy are being introduced in clinical practice. These technologies hold promise for enhancing surgical precision, ultimately improving the oncological and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrianos Tsekrekos
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 52 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.T.); (Y.O.); (I.R.)
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Umeå, 907 19 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Yasuhiro Okumura
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 52 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.T.); (Y.O.); (I.R.)
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 57 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ioannis Rouvelas
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 52 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.T.); (Y.O.); (I.R.)
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 57 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 52 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.T.); (Y.O.); (I.R.)
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 57 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dong TX, Wang D, Zhao Q, Zhang ZD, Zhao XF, Tan BB, Liu Y, Liu QW, Yang PG, Ding PA, Zheng T, Li Y, Liu ZJ. Comparative analysis of two digestive tract reconstruction methods in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1109-1120. [PMID: 38690052 PMCID: PMC11056665 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of gastric cancer has significantly increased in recent years. Surgical resection is the main treatment, but the method of digestive tract reconstruction after gastric cancer surgery remains controversial. In the current study, we sought to explore a reasonable method of digestive tract reconstruction and improve the quality of life and nutritional status of patients after surgery. To this end, we statistically analyzed the clinical results of patients with gastric cancer who underwent jejunal interposition double-tract reconstruction (DTR) and esophageal jejunum Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY). AIM To explore the application effect of DTR in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TLTG) and evaluate its safety and efficacy. METHODS We collected the relevant data of 77 patients who underwent TLTG at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2021 to January 2023. Among them, 35 cases were treated with DTR, and the remaining 42 cases were treated with traditional RY. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the cases were grouped into 31 cases per group, with evenly distributed data. The clinical characteristics and short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the two groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS The two groups showed no significant differences in basic data, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissections, first defecation time after operation, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and laboratory examination results on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days after operation. The operation time of the DTR group was longer than that of the RY group [(307.58 ± 65.14) min vs (272.45 ± 62.09) min, P = 0.016], but the first intake of liquid food in the DTR group was shorter than that in the RY group [(4.45 ± 1.18) d vs (6.0 ± 5.18) d, P = 0.028]. The incidence of reflux heartburn (Visick grade) and postoperative gallbladder disease in the DTR group was lower than that in the RY group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.038). Although there was no significant difference in body weight, hemoglobin, prealbumin, and albumin between the two groups at 1,3 and 6 months after surgery, the diet of patients in the DTR group was better than that in the RY group (P = 0.031). CONCLUSION The clinical effect of DTR in TLTG is better than that of RY, indicating that it is a more valuable digestive tract reconstruction method in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-Xiang Dong
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Qun Zhao
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Dong Zhang
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Xue-Feng Zhao
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Bi-Bo Tan
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Qing-Wei Liu
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Pei-Gang Yang
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ping-An Ding
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Tao Zheng
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yong Li
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zi-Jing Liu
- Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li P, Li Z, Linghu E, Ji J. Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024; 137:887-908. [PMID: 38515297 PMCID: PMC11046028 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive system in China. Few comprehensive practice guidelines for early gastric cancer in China are currently available. Therefore, we created the Chinese national clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer. METHODS This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed in accordance with the World Health Organization's recommended process and with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) in assessing evidence quality. We used the Evidence to Decision framework to formulate clinical recommendations to minimize bias and increase transparency in the CPG development process. We used the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) as reporting and conduct guidelines to ensure completeness and transparency of the CPG. RESULTS This CPG contains 40 recommendations regarding the prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of early gastric cancer based on available clinical studies and guidelines. We provide recommendations for the timing of Helicobacter pylori eradication, screening populations for early gastric cancer, indications for endoscopic resection and surgical gastrectomy, follow-up interval after treatment, and other recommendations. CONCLUSIONS This CPG can lead to optimum care for patients and populations by providing up-to-date medical information. We intend this CPG for widespread adoption to increase the standard of prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of early gastric cancer; thereby, contributing to improving national health care and patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Enqiang Linghu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Imam MS, Abdel‐Sattar RM, Alotaibi GR, Alotaibi KS, Almuthaybiri NM, Alshahrani SA, Alghamdi MA, Abdelrahim MEA. A meta-analysis evaluating wound infections and other complications following distal versus complete gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14516. [PMID: 38084020 PMCID: PMC10958092 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
A meta-analysis investigation was carried out to measure the wound infections (WIs) and other postoperative problems (PPs) of distal gastrectomy (DG) compared with total gastrectomy (TG) for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature investigation till February 2023 was used and 1247 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 12 chosen investigations enclosed 2896 individuals with GC in the chosen investigations' starting point, 1375 of them were TG, and 1521 were DG. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to compute the value of the WIs and other PPs of DG compared with TG for GC by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. TG had significantly higher overall PP (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.15-2.18, p = 0.005), WIs (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.07-2.67, p = 0.02), peritoneal abscess (PA) (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.67-5.36, p < 0.001), anastomotic leakage (AL) (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.21-2.97, p = 0.005) and death (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.17-4.37, p = 0.02) compared to those with DG in individuals with GC. TG had significantly higher overall PP, WIs, PA, AL and death compared to those with DG in individuals with GC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S. Imam
- Pharmacy Practice Department, College of PharmacyShaqra UniversityShaqraSaudi Arabia
- Clinical Pharmacy DepartmentNational Cancer Institute, Cairo UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Randa M. Abdel‐Sattar
- Biomedical Sciences Department, College of PharmacyShaqra UniversityShaqraSaudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang X, Wei Z, Fu H, Hu Z, Wang W, Yan R. Predictors of iatrogenic splenic injury in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1361185. [PMID: 38601758 PMCID: PMC11005098 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1361185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Iatrogenic splenic injury (ISI) is a recognized complication in radical gastrectomy that may result in incidental splenectomy (IS). However, the predictors of such events remain largely unknown. Methods Medical records of the patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at our institution between January 2015 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Potential predictors of ISI and IS were collected and analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results were reported as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 2916 patients were included, of whom 211 patients (7.2%) suffered from ISI and 75 patients (2.6%) underwent IS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that BMI≥25 (OR: 3.198 (2.356-4.326), p<0.001), total gastrectomy (OR: 2.201 (1.601-3.025), p<0.001), and the existence of "criminal fold" (OR: 13.899 (2.824-251.597), p=0.011) were independent predictive risk factors for ISI; whereas laparoscopic surgical approach (OR: 0.048 (0.007-0.172), p<0.001) was a protective factor for ISI. Moreover, the existence of "criminal fold" (OR: 15.745 (3.106-288.470), p=0.008) and BMI≥25 (OR: 2.498 (1.002-6.046), p=0.044) were identified as independent risk factors of ISI under laparoscopic gastrectomy. There was no association between sex, age, previous abdominal surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, outlet obstruction, tumor stage, nodal stage, and total lymph node retrieved and ISI. Conclusions BMI≥25 and total gastrectomy can predict high risk of ISI during radical gastrectomy. Laparoscopic surgery is superior to open gastrectomy in lowing the risk of ISI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Weijun Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ronglin Yan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gu H, Li W, Zhou L. Application of hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:73. [PMID: 38439060 PMCID: PMC10910664 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03350-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic implication of hand-sewn anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS Retrospective analysis is adopted to the clinicopathologic data of 112 patients with gastric cancer (GC) who went through LTG in the Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between October 2020 and October 2022. Among them, 60 individuals receiving medical care were split into the hand-sewn anastomosis group (Group H, N = 60); while, 52 individuals were split into the circular stapler anastomosis group (Group C, N = 52) The clinical efficacy and prognostic conditions of hand-sewn anastomosis are compared with those of circular stapler anastomosis in the application of LTG. RESULTS The analysis results indicated that no notable difference was observed in intraoperative bleeding volume, time to first flatus (TFF), postoperative hospitalization duration and postoperative complications among the two groups (P > 0.05). Group H had shorter esophagojejunal anastomosis duration (20.0 min vs. 35.0 min) and surgery duration (252.6 ± 19.4 min vs. 265.9 ± 19.8 min), smaller incisions (5.0 cm vs. 10.5 cm), and lower hospitalization costs (58415.0 CNY vs. 63382.5 CNY) compared to Group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The clinical efficacy and the postoperative complications of hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy are basically equivalent in comparison to the circular stapler anastomosis in the application of LTG. Its advantage lies in shorter esophagojejunal anastomosis duration, shorter surgery duration, smaller incisions, lower hospitalization costs and wider adaptability of the location of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Gu
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
| | - Weixiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lianbang Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yan W, Zhu L, Wang J. Effects of Clavien-Dindo Classification on Long-Term Survival of Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer After Radical Resection: A Propensity Score-matched Study. Am Surg 2024; 90:356-364. [PMID: 37679024 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231191230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of postoperative complications (POCs) classified by the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) system on long-term survival after radical resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is not yet clear. METHODS This study analyzed 531 patients with AGC who underwent radical resection in an institution between January 2015 and December 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the occurrence of POCs and recorded according to C-D classifications. The long-term survival outcomes of the entire cohort after propensity score matching (PSM) were compared. RESULTS After PSM, there was no significant difference in baseline data between the complications (C) group (n = 92) and the non-complications (NC) group (n = 92). Survival analysis showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were lower in the C group (48.9% vs 62.0%, P = .040; 38.5% vs 54.9%, P = .005; respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that severe complications (C-D grade > II) were associated with a decrease in 5-year OS and RFS compared with the matched NC group (40.0% vs 62.0%, P = .008; 29.4% vs 54.9%, P = .001; respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor size, and complications were independent risk factors for poor survival outcomes. Further multivariate analysis showed that older age, combined excision, and comorbidities were independent risk factors for POCs. CONCLUSIONS Severe complications reduced the survival outcome of patients. More attention should be paid to perioperative management of patients with high risk factors for complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenwu Yan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Jinguo Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Riascos MC, Greenberg JA, Palacardo F, Edelmuth R, Lewis VC, An A, Najah H, Al Asadi H, Safe P, Finnerty BM, Christos PJ, Fahey TJ, Zarnegar R. Timing to Surgery and Lymph Node Upstaging in Gastric Cancer: An NCDB Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1714-1724. [PMID: 38006526 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14536-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown tumor specificity on the impact of longer time interval from diagnosis to surgery, however in gastric cancer (GC) this remains unclear. We aimed to determine if a longer time interval from diagnosis to surgery had an impact on lymph node (LN) upstaging and overall survival (OS) outcomes among patients with clinically node negative (cN0) GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with cN0 GC undergoing surgery between 2004-2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and divided into intervals between time of diagnosis and surgery [short interval (SI): ≥ 4 days to < 8 weeks and long interval (LI): ≥ 8 weeks]. Multivariable regression analysis evaluated the independent impact of surgical timing on LN upstaging and a Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated survival outcomes. RESULTS Of 1824 patients with cN0 GC, 71.8% had a SI to surgery and 28.1% had a LI to surgery. LN upstaging was seen more often in the SI group when compared to LI group (82% versus 76%, p = 0.004). LI to surgery showed to be an independent factor protective against LN upstaging [adjusted odds ratio = 0.62, 95% CI: (0.39-0.99)]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that time to surgery was not associated with a difference in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% CI: (0.71-1.17)], however uncontrolled Kaplan-Meier curves showed OS difference between the SI and LI to surgery groups (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION Timing to surgery was not a predictor of LN upstaging or overall survival, suggesting that additional medical optimization in preparation for surgery and careful preoperative staging may be appropriate in patients with node negative early stage GC without affecting outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - V Colby Lewis
- Department of Population and Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anjile An
- Department of Population and Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haythem Najah
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hala Al Asadi
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parima Safe
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas J Fahey
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rasa Zarnegar
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tian M, Yao Z, Zhou Y, Gan Q, Wang L, Lu H, Wang S, Zhou P, Dai Z, Zhang S, Sun Y, Tang Z, Yu J, Wang X. DeepRisk network: an AI-based tool for digital pathology signature and treatment responsiveness of gastric cancer using whole-slide images. J Transl Med 2024; 22:182. [PMID: 38373959 PMCID: PMC10877826 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital histopathology provides valuable information for clinical decision-making. We hypothesized that a deep risk network (DeepRisk) based on digital pathology signature (DPS) derived from whole-slide images could improve the prognostic value of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system and offer chemotherapeutic benefits for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS DeepRisk is a multi-scale, attention-based learning model developed on 1120 GCs in the Zhongshan dataset and validated with two external datasets. Then, we assessed its association with prognosis and treatment response. The multi-omics analysis and multiplex Immunohistochemistry were conducted to evaluate the potential pathogenesis and spatial immune contexture underlying DPS. RESULTS Multivariate analysis indicated that the DPS was an independent prognosticator with a better C-index (0.84 for overall survival and 0.71 for disease-free survival). Patients with low-DPS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy responded favorably to treatment. Spatial analysis indicated that exhausted immune clusters and increased infiltration of CD11b+CD11c+ immune cells were present at the invasive margin of high-DPS group. Multi-omics data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-Stomach adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) hint at the relevance of DPS to myeloid derived suppressor cells infiltration and immune suppression. CONCLUSION DeepRisk network is a reliable tool that enhances prognostic value of TNM staging and aid in precise treatment, providing insights into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengxin Tian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhao Yao
- Biomedical Engineering Center, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
- The Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yufu Zhou
- Department of Immunology and Pathogenic Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiangjun Gan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leihao Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongwei Lu
- Biomedical Engineering Center, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
- The Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Siyuan Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiqiang Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China
- Xiamen Clinical Research Center for Cancer Therapy, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China
| | - Sijia Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yihong Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaoqing Tang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
| | - Jinhua Yu
- Biomedical Engineering Center, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
- The Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xuefei Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
- Xiamen Clinical Research Center for Cancer Therapy, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Patil M, Gharde P, Reddy K, Nayak K. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Procedures in Specific General Surgical Interventions. Cureus 2024; 16:e54433. [PMID: 38510915 PMCID: PMC10951803 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic and open surgeries are two distinct surgical approaches with significantly different procedures and outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery, also known as laparoscopic surgery, utilizes small incisions and specialized instruments like the laparoscope to perform procedures. This contrasts with open surgery, which requires larger incisions to directly access the surgical site. Open surgery was the preferred approach for any invasive procedure until the introduction of new technological advances in the form of laparoscopy. While laparoscopy is still evolving, preliminary results demonstrate promise for various operations. Open surgery provides the healthcare professional with more liberty in the form of increased visualization, but it also increases tissue damage and hospital stays. Laparoscopic and open procedures are both valuable surgical methods with advantages and disadvantages. While open surgery is favored for difficult patients, laparoscopic surgery offers a quicker recovery and fewer scars. The choice between the two approaches depends on the patient's condition, surgical demands, and the surgeon's skills. As these methods develop, they become increasingly important for offering safe and efficient surgical treatments across a range of medical specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir Patil
- General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Pankaj Gharde
- General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Kavyanjali Reddy
- General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Krushank Nayak
- General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lim HJ, di Pietro M, O’Neill JR. A Systematic Review on Clinical and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes following Total Gastrectomy in Patients with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:473. [PMID: 38339225 PMCID: PMC10854827 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal-dominant syndrome associated with early onset diffuse gastric cancer. Definitive treatment is prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) associated with significant morbidity. Studies published from January 2000 to December 2022 reporting clinical, histopathological or health-related quality of life outcomes in HDGC patients undergoing PTG were identified. The study quality was assessed by the "Newcastle-Ottawa scale". Of the 257 articles screened, 21 were selected. A total of 353 patients were examined in 15 studies that reported surgical outcomes. The median age was 42 years old. The median major complication and mortality rates were 19.2% and 0.3%, respectively. The most common complications were wound infection at 4.8% followed by anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications at 4.5% each. Following PTG, 88.6% of patients had early lesions amongst 414 patients. The mean/median number of signet ring cell carcinoma foci in the gastrectomy specimens was from 2 to 78. All cases were stage 1 with no lymph node involvement. There was a wide range of psychosocial effects following PTG closely related to the physical symptoms. It is imperative for patients to receive comprehensive preoperative counselling to make an informed decision and be followed up under the care of a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Jun Lim
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK or (H.J.L.); (M.d.P.)
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Massimiliano di Pietro
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK or (H.J.L.); (M.d.P.)
| | - J. Robert O’Neill
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK or (H.J.L.); (M.d.P.)
- Cambridge Oesophagogastric Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hong QQ, Yan S, Zhao YL, Fan L, Yang L, Zhang WB, Liu H, Lin HX, Zhang J, Ye ZJ, Shen X, Cai LS, Zhang GW, Zhu JM, Ji G, Chen JP, Wang W, Li ZR, Zhu JT, Li GX, You J. Machine learning identifies the risk of complications after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:79-90. [PMID: 38293327 PMCID: PMC10823896 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i1.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is widely used, and perioperative complications have become a highly concerned issue. AIM To develop a predictive model for complications in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer to better predict the likelihood of complications in gastric cancer patients within 30 days after surgery, guide perioperative treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients, and prevent serious complications. METHODS In total, 998 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 16 Chinese medical centers were included in the training group for the complication model, and 398 patients were included in the validation group. The clinicopathological data and 30-d postoperative complications of gastric cancer patients were collected. Three machine learning methods, lasso regression, random forest, and artificial neural networks, were used to construct postoperative complication prediction models for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and their prediction efficacy and accuracy were evaluated. RESULTS The constructed complication model, particularly the random forest model, could better predict serious complications in gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. It exhibited stable performance in external validation and is worthy of further promotion in more centers. CONCLUSION Using the risk factors identified in multicenter datasets, highly sensitive risk prediction models for complications following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were established. We hope to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of preoperative and postoperative decision-making by using these models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing-Qi Hong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen 361001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Su Yan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China
| | - Yong-Liang Zhao
- Department of General Surgery and Center of Minimal Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Lin Fan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wen-Bin Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urmuqi 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - He-Xin Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen 361001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhi-Jian Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xian Shen
- Department of Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Sheng Cai
- Department of General Surgery Unit 4, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China
| | - Guo-Wei Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361021, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jia-Ming Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Hernia Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Gang Ji
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jin-Ping Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362002, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zheng-Rong Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Jing-Tao Zhu
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 35000, Fujian Province, China
| | - Guo-Xin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun You
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen 361001, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meng C, Cao S, Yu Q, Tian Y, Li Z, Liu X, Sun Y, Liu Q, Zhong H, Niu Z, Zhou Y. Short- and long-term comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with BMI≥30 kg/m 2: A propensity score matched analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107312. [PMID: 38071764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric patients has gained popularity in recent decades, reports on the comparison of short and long clinical outcomes between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer patients with BMI≥30 kg/m2 are still limited. METHODS A total of 226 obese gastric cancer patients who underwent either RG (n = 81) or LG (n = 145) were enrolled in this study between October 2014 and September 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to reduce confounding bias. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the RG and LG groups. RESULTS The clinicopathological characteristics of 156 patients in the RG group (n = 79) and LG group (n = 79) were well balanced after PSM. Compared with the LG group, the RG group had a significantly shorter operation time, less estimated blood loss, more harvested lymph nodes, a faster postoperative recovery course, reduced surgical morbidity, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. The long-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS RG is a safe and feasible approach for gastric cancer with a BMI≥30 kg/m2 and has better short-term clinical outcomes than LG. However, RG is similar to LG in terms of long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Meng
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Shougen Cao
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Qin Yu
- General Internal Medicine, Jimo People's Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Yulong Tian
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Zequn Li
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Xiaodong Liu
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Yuqi Sun
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Hao Zhong
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Zhaojian Niu
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China
| | - Yanbing Zhou
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tu RH, Lin M, Lin JX, Wu SZ, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Zheng CH, Huang CM, Li P. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Long-term outcome in a teaching center. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:459-465. [PMID: 37879983 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) are increasing, yet the evidence of the relationship between the learning curve and long-term outcomes is limited. AIMS To analyze the relationship between the learning curve and survival in GC patients over a 10-year period. METHODS This retrospective cohort study studied 3674 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Cusum and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the association between the surgeon's experience and the 3 years overall survival (OS). RESULTS The 3-year OS of all patients was 71.8 %. This increase of 3-year OS was associated with laparoscopic cases (r = 0.638, p = 0.047). Analysis of the CUSUM curve showed a significant change in the 3-year OS of 1400 cases. Further propensity score matching (PSM) of patients during and after the learning curve (<1400 and ≥ 1400 cases) showed a significant difference in the 3-year OS between the two groups (68.5 % vs. 72.3 %, p = 0.045). Cox regression analysis verified that in ≥1400 cases, prior laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.045), textbook outcome (TO) and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) were independent protective factors. The LN non-compliance rate was an independent risk factor. In contrast, the rate of TO and the median number of retrieved LNs were significantly higher after the learning curve (≥1400 cases). Furthermore, the rates of LN non-compliance were significantly lower (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Increasing laparoscopic surgical experience is associated with surgical quality and prognostic improvement in patients with gastric cancer. But improvements in outcomes accrued slowly over a long period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-Hong Tu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mi Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Sheng-Ze Wu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Long-Long Cao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang F, Zhang X, Tang L, Wu Q, Cai M, Li Y, Qu X, Qiu H, Zhang Y, Ying J, Zhang J, Sun L, Lin R, Wang C, Liu H, Qiu M, Guan W, Rao S, Ji J, Xin Y, Sheng W, Xu H, Zhou Z, Zhou A, Jin J, Yuan X, Bi F, Liu T, Liang H, Zhang Y, Li G, Liang J, Liu B, Shen L, Li J, Xu R. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2024; 44:127-172. [PMID: 38160327 PMCID: PMC10794017 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng‐Hua Wang
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Xiao‐Tian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal OncologyKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education)Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Lei Tang
- Department of RadiologyPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Endoscopy CenterPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Mu‐Yan Cai
- Department of PathologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Yuan‐Fang Li
- Department of Gastric SurgerySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Xiu‐Juan Qu
- Department of Medical OncologyThe First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Hong Qiu
- Department of Medical OncologyTongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Yu‐Jing Zhang
- Department of RadiotherapySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Jie‐Er Ying
- Department of Medical OncologyZhejiang Cancer HospitalHangzhouZhejiangP. R. China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyRuijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Ling‐Yu Sun
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinHeilongjiangP. R. China
| | - Rong‐Bo Lin
- Department of Medical OncologyFujian Cancer HospitalFuzhouFujianP. R. China
| | - Chang Wang
- Tumor CenterThe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunJilinP. R. China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General SurgeryNanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Miao‐Zhen Qiu
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Wen‐Long Guan
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Sheng‐Xiang Rao
- Department of RadiologyZhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Jia‐Fu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Yan Xin
- Pathology Laboratory of Gastrointestinal TumorThe First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Wei‐Qi Sheng
- Department of PathologyZhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Fudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Hui‐Mian Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery. The First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Zhi‐Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric SurgerySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Ai‐Ping Zhou
- Department of OncologyNational Cancer CenterNational Clinical Research Center for CancerCancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingP. R. China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation OncologyShenzhen hospitalCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingP. R. China
| | - Xiang‐Lin Yuan
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Feng Bi
- Department of Abdominal OncologyWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduSichuanP. R. China
| | - Tian‐Shu Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyZhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastric SurgeryTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalTianjinP. R. China
| | - Yan‐Qiao Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyCancer Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinHeilongjiangP. R. China
| | - Guo‐Xin Li
- Department of General SurgeryNanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Medical OncologyPeking University International HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Bao‐Rui Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyNanjing Drum Tower HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingP. R. China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of GI OncologyKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education)Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of OncologyEaster Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Tongji UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Rui‐Hua Xu
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kunisaki C, Katai H, Sakuramoto S, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Kadoya S, Yamada T, Kinoshita T, Yoshikawa T, Terashima M. A nonrandomized controlled trial: long-term outcomes of LATG/LAPG for cStage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:164-175. [PMID: 37875696 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01432-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A previous report confirmed the safety of laparoscopy-assisted total and proximal gastrectomies (LATG and LAPG) (JCOG1401). This report demonstrates the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after long-term follow-up to confirm the efficacy of these surgical methods as key secondary endpoints for cStage I gastric cancer. METHODS This study enrolled patients who had histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma and were diagnosed with clinical T1N0, T1N(+), or T2N0 tumors according to the 14th edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (3rd English edition). RESULTS Between April 2015 and February 2017, 246 patients were enrolled, although one patient was excluded because of misregistration. Meticulous follow-up was continued for > 5 years for each patient, and the data were analyzed in March 2022. The 5-year RFS was 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85.5-93.2%), and the 5-year OS was 91.2% (95% CI 86.9-94.2%) in all enrolled patients. Grade 3 or 4 late postoperative complications were detected in 12.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS This single-arm study showed that the long-term outcomes of LATG/LAPG for cStage I gastric cancer were acceptable, which is considered one of the standard treatments when performed by experienced surgeons. Trail registration UMIN000017155 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chikara Kunisaki
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan.
| | - Hitoshi Katai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tachikawa Hospital, Tachikawa, Japan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Sakuramoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Katayama
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Kadoya
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Takanobu Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kinoshita
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takaki Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bryant MK, Sillcox R, Grady WM, Oelschlager BK. Laparoscopic prophylactic total gastrectomy with limited lymphadenectomy for CDH1 gene carriers. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9373-9380. [PMID: 37644154 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CDH1 gene mutations are the leading etiology of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer with cumulative lifetime risk ranging up to 83%. Prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) is, therefore, recommended for CDH1 carriers. A laparoscopic approach may reduce operative risk versus an open operation, thus leading more patients with CDH1 mutations to pursue PTG prior to cancer development. However, more experience and oncologic outcome data are needed for a laparoscopic approach and indicated lymphadenectomy. METHODS A retrospective descriptive cohort study of adult patients with CDH1 mutations who underwent laparoscopic PTG with D1 lymphadenectomy between 2012 and 2022 was conducted at a single institution. All patients had preoperative EGD screening, and those with visible tumor lesions on surveillance EGD were excluded and not considered prophylactic. Demographics, family history, pathology, and operative course were obtained. Outcomes included complications, readmission, and postoperative weight change. RESULTS Among 23 patients, median age was 48 years (IQR 37, 53) and 15 (65%) were female. Family history for gastric and/or lobular breast cancer was present in 22 (96%) patients. The median [IQR] time from positive genetic testing to PTG was 347 days [140, 625]. Pathologic evaluation showed five (22%) patients with foci of gastric cancer on pre-operative EGD biopsies, 10 (44%) in resected stomach specimens. All lymph nodes were negative. To address early postoperative complications, EJ anastomotic technique changed from EEA to GIA over the course of the study and feeding jejunostomy was no longer placed during PTG with minimal change in postoperative weight loss. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series, spanning 10 years at a single institution, dedicated solely to a laparoscopic approach for risk-reducing PTG. A laparoscopic approach with limited lymphadenectomy resulted in acceptable surgical and oncologic outcomes. Despite no visible cancer, over half of our patients had foci of early gastric cancer. Therefore, CDH1 carriers should consider laparoscopic PTG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary K Bryant
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 3564101, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Rachel Sillcox
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 3564101, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - William M Grady
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brant K Oelschlager
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 3564101, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cheng X, Huang C, Jia W, Guo Z, Shi Y, Song Z, Feng H, Huang H, Xu S, Li H, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Liu K, Ji X, Zhao R. Clinical status and future prospects of single-incision robotic-assisted surgery: a review. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4221-4237. [PMID: 37988410 PMCID: PMC10720873 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Since the advent of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery, the prosperity of minimally invasive surgery has been thriving on the advancement of endoscopic techniques. Cosmetic superiority, recovery benefits, and noninferior surgical outcomes weigh single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a promising modality. Although there are surgical challenges posed by steep learning curve and technological difficulties, such as instruments collision, triangulation loss and limited retraction, the establishment of robotic surgical platform as a solution to all is inspiring. Furthermore, with enhanced instrument maneuverability and stability, robotic ergonomic innovations adopt the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery and surmount its recognized barriers by introducing a novel combination, single-incision robotic-assisted surgery. As was gradually diffused in general surgery and other specialties, single-incision robotic-assisted surgery manifests privileges in noninferior clinical outcomes an satisfactory cosmetic effect among strictly selected patients, and has the potential of a preferable surgical option for minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Cheng
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenhao Huang
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenqing Jia
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zichao Guo
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiqing Shi
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zijia Song
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haoran Feng
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyan Huang
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuiyu Xu
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haosheng Li
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaodong Wang
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaqi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun Liu
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaopin Ji
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ren Zhao
- Department of General Surgery
- Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Muttillo EM, La Franca A, Stefanelli S, Coppola A, Li Causi FS, Giannella RA, Pino E, Castagnola G, Scarinci A, Balducci G, Mercantini P. Oncological Adequacy of Laparoscopic Surgery for Bulky Gastric Cancer: Results of a Western Single-Center Series. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2243. [PMID: 38137844 PMCID: PMC10744348 DOI: 10.3390/life13122243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is increasing worldwide and one million new cases were estimated globally in 2020. Use of the laparoscopic approach is increasing especially for subtotal gastrectomy. However, to date, solid data on locally advanced bulky tumors are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery in bulky gastric tumors. METHODS We performed an observational retrospective single-center analysis. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, tumor-related data, intra-operative data, peri-operative data, and pathological data. Statistical analysis was conducted, including descriptive statistics and chi-squared test, to analyze the differences between categorical variables. RESULTS O the 116 patients who underwent gastric surgery, 49 patients were included in the study protocol. All patients had bulky gastric tumors. Eighteen patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and 31 open gastrectomy. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 28.5 (15-46) in the laparoscopic group and 23.05 (6-62) in the open group (p = 0.04). In total, 5.6% of patients of the laparoscopic group had <16 lymph nodes harvested and 35.5% in the open group (p = 0.035). No statistical differences were found between the open and laparoscopic groups in terms of surgical margins (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery is still a subject of debate in locally advanced bulky gastric cancer. Limited data are available concerning Western patients. This study showed superiority in terms of the quality of lymphadenectomy and non-inferiority in terms of radical resection margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Maria Muttillo
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Alice La Franca
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Silvia Stefanelli
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Alessandro Coppola
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Saverio Li Causi
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Rachele Anna Giannella
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Elena Pino
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Giorgio Castagnola
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Andrea Scarinci
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Genoveffa Balducci
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| | - Paolo Mercantini
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00198 Rome, Italy; (E.M.M.); (A.L.F.); (S.S.); (F.S.L.C.); (R.A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
WEI GUO, ZHIPENG HE, SHI SU, FEDOR CAROLINENADIA, XIANGHUANG MEI, YANGYANG WANG, KE ZHANG, XIAOQI GUAN, MALCOLM V. BROCK, ORITA HAJIME, FUKUNAGA TETSU. Totally Laparoscopic Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy (TLPPG) is Safe and Effective for Early Gastric Cancer Treatment. JUNTENDO IJI ZASSHI = JUNTENDO MEDICAL JOURNAL 2023; 69:466-476. [PMID: 38855066 PMCID: PMC11153081 DOI: 10.14789/jmj.jmj23-0018-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Compared to distal gastrectomy (DG), pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), a peristaltic function-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer (EGC), is advantageous as it leads to a more improved nutritional status and quality of life (QOL) of patients. In recent years, total laparoscopic PPG (TLPPG), an anastomosis which is performed intracorporeally, has increasingly replaced laparoscopic-assisted PPG (LAPPG) due to its minimal invasiveness. Aim To evaluate the safety and feasibility of TLPPG in terms of perioperative efficacy. Patients Three patients underwent TLPPG in the Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College from September 2021 to March 2022. Methods Surgical safety analysis: Our three cases (TLPPG group) were compared to data from the CLASS-02 study, which collected data from multiple centers across China for the laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG group). The CLASS-02 study provides data from the most invasive type of gastric surgery, providing solid comparative data to our own.Postoperative short-term efficacy analysis: Patient questionnaire responses provided data on postoperative nutritional and QOL status. Results from our three cases were compared to the Japanese multicenter data PGSAS-37 (PGSAS group). Results There were no complications or deaths occurred during or after operation in our cases. Compared to the PGSAS group, our cases scored lower for abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and weight loss. Conclusion Although more case information is needed, our findings demonstrate that TLPPG may be a possible and effective treatment for EGC in China, similar to that in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - HAJIME ORITA
- Corresponding author: Hajime Orita, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Upper), Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan, TEL: +81-3-3813-3111/+81-3-5802-1743 FAX: +81-3-5802-1557 E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang C, Zhang P, Yu J, Jiang Q, Shen Q, Mao G, Kargbo AB, Liu W, Zeng X, Yin Y, Tao K. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comprehensive contrastive analysis with propensity score matching. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:350. [PMID: 37940927 PMCID: PMC10633974 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03221-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is increasingly applied in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). However, there is no study to comprehensively evaluate the clinicopathological, prognostic, and laboratory data such as nutrition, immune, inflammation-associated indexes, and tumor markers between LG and open gastrectomy (OG) for LAGC following NC. METHODS The clinicopathological, prognostic, and laboratory data of LAGC patients with clinical stage of cT2-4aN1-3M0 who underwent gastrectomy after NC were retrospectively collected. The effects of LG and OG were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS This study enrolled 148 cases, of which 110 cases were included after PSM. The LG group had a shorter length of incision (P < 0.001) and was superior to OG group in terms of blood loss (P < 0.001), postoperative first flatus time (P < 0.001), and postoperative first liquid diet time (P = 0.004). No significant difference was found in postoperative complications (P = 0.482). Laboratory results showed that LG group had less reduced red blood cells (P = 0.039), hemoglobin (P = 0.018), prealbumin (P = 0.010) in 3 days after surgery, and less reduced albumin in 1 day (P = 0.029), 3 days (P = 0.015), and 7 days (P = 0.035) after surgery than the OG group. The systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammatory response index were not significantly different between the two groups. As for oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences in postoperative tumor markers of CEA (P = 0.791), CA199 (P = 0.499), and CA724 (P = 0.378). The 5-year relapse-free survival rates (P = 0.446) were 46.9% and 43.3% in the LG and OG groups, with the 5-year overall survival rates (P = 0.742) being 46.7% and 52.1%, respectively; the differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size ≥ 4 cm (P = 0.021) and the absence of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.012) were independent risk factors for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS LG has faster gastrointestinal recovery, better postoperative nutritional status, and comparable oncological outcomes than OG, which can serve as an alternative surgical method for LAGC patients after NC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenggang Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Jiaxian Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Qi Jiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Qian Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Gan Mao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Abu Bakarr Kargbo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Weizhen Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Xiangyu Zeng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Yuping Yin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.
| | - Kaixiong Tao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Takahashi C, Glasser J, Schuster C, Huston J, Shridhar R, Meredith K. Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic approaches to gastrectomy: a National Cancer Database study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7530-7537. [PMID: 37433916 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10204-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is associated with significant mortality worldwide. Radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is considered the only curative option. Traditionally, these operations are associated with significant morbidity. Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and more recently robotic gastrectomy (RG) techniques have been developed to potentially decrease the perioperative morbidity. We sought to compare oncologic outcomes with laparoscopic and robotic techniques for gastrectomy. METHODS Utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by open, robotic or laparoscopic surgical technique. Open gastrectomy patients were excluded. RESULTS We identified 1,301 patients who underwent RG and 4,892 LG with median ages of 65 (20-90) and 66 (18-90) respectively, p = 0.02. The mean number of positive lymph nodes were higher in the LG 2.2 ± 4.4 vs RG 1.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.01. The R0 resections were higher in the RG at 94.5% vs 91.9% in LG, p = 0.001. Conversions to open were 7.1% in the RG and 16% in the LG group, p < 0.001. The median length of hospitalization was 8 (6-11) in both groups. There was no difference in the 30-day readmission (p = 0.65), 30-day mortality (p = 0.85) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.34) between groups. The median and overall 5-year survival was 71.3 mo and 56% in the RG and 66.1 mo and 52% in the LG, p = 0.03. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores, location of gastric cancer, histology grade, pathologic T-stage, pathologic N-stage, surgical margins, and facility volume were all predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS Robotic and laparoscopic techniques are both acceptable approaches to gastrectomy. However, conversions to open are higher and R0 resections rates are lower in the laparoscopic group. Additionally, a survival benefit is demonstrated in those undergoing robotic gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jamie Glasser
- Brian D. Jellison Cancer Institute, Sarasota Memorial Hospital System, Florida State of University College of Medicine, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - Cassie Schuster
- Brian D. Jellison Cancer Institute, Sarasota Memorial Hospital System, Florida State of University College of Medicine, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - Jamie Huston
- Sarasota Memorial Cancer Institute, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Meredith
- Brian D. Jellison Cancer Institute, Sarasota Memorial Hospital System, Florida State of University College of Medicine, Sarasota, FL, USA.
- Sarasota Memorial Cancer Institute, Sarasota, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hirata Y, Chiang YJ, Mansfield P, Badgwell BD, Ikoma N. Trends of Oncological Quality of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in the United States. World J Oncol 2023; 14:371-381. [PMID: 37869235 PMCID: PMC10588505 DOI: 10.14740/wjon1657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been increasingly used for treatment of gastric cancer in the United States. However, it is unknown if there has been a nationwide improvement of short-term safety outcomes and oncological quality metrics over time. Methods We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients who underwent major gastrectomy from 2010 through 2018. The short-term safety outcomes and oncological metrics were compared between cases of open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), and RG. We also compared the indications and outcomes of RG between the three periods (2010 - 2012, 2013 - 2015, and 2016 - 2018). Results Of the 22,445 patients included, 1,867 (8%) underwent RG. Number of RG continued to increase from only 37 cases performed in 2010 to 412 cases performed in 2018. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined (OG, 16; LG, 17; and RG, 19) and the R0 rate (OG, 88%; LG, 92%; and RG 94%) were better for RG than for OG or LG (P < 0.001). In the RG group, the number of LNs examined (first period, 15; third period, 18; P < 0.001), R0 rate (first period, 88.6%; third period, 91.1%; P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (first period, 9 days; third period, 8 days; P < 0.001), 30-day readmission rate (first period, 10.1%; third period, 7.9%; P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (first period, 7.3%; third period, 6.0%; P = 0.003) continued to improve cohort over time. The ratio of the robotic cases performed in academic institutions gradually increased (first period, 48.6%; third period, 54.3%; P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, RG was associated with more than 15 LNs being examined (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.34 - 1.65; P < 0.001). The indications for RG appeared expanding to include more advanced stage, high comorbidity, and patients who underwent preoperative therapy. Conclusions RG has been increasingly performed in the past decade. Although its indication was expanded to include more advanced tumors, we found that the oncological quality metrics and safety outcomes of RG have improved over time and were better than those of OG or LG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hirata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian D. Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yan Y, Wang D, Mahuron K, Wang X, Lu L, Zhao Z, Melstrom L, Li C, Paz IB, Liu J, Fong Y, Li W, Fu W, Woo Y. Different Methods of Minimally Invasive Esophagojejunostomy After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Outcomes from Two Experienced Centers. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6718-6727. [PMID: 37442910 PMCID: PMC10506935 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13771-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagojejunostomy after minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) for gastric cancer (GC) is technically challenging. Failure of the esophagojejunal anastomosis can lead to significant morbidity, leading to short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) impairment or mortality. The optimal reconstruction method following MITG remains controversial. We evaluated outcomes of minimally invasive esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic or robotic total gastrectomies. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed MITG patients between 2015 and 2020 at two high-volume centers in China and the United States. Eligible patients were divided into groups by different reconstruction methods. We compared clinicopathologic characteristics, postoperative outcomes, including complication rates, overall survival rate (OS), disease-free survival rate (DFS), and patient-reported QoL. RESULTS GC patients (n = 105) were divided into intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IEJ, n = 60) and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EEJ, n = 45) groups. EEJ had higher incidence of wound infection (8.3% vs 13.3%, P = 0.044) and pneumonia (21.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.042) than IEJ. The linear stapler (LS) group was inferior to the circular stapler (CS) group in reflux [50.0 (11.1-77.8) vs 44.4 (0.0-66.7), P = 0.041] and diarrhea [33.3 (0.0-66.7) vs 0.0 (0.0-66.7), P = 0.045] while LS was better than CS for dysphagia [22.2 (0.0-33.3) vs 11.1 (0.0-33.3), P = 0.049] and eating restrictions [33.3 (16.7-58.3) vs 41.7 (16.7-66.7), P = 0.029] at 1 year. OS and DFS did not differ significantly between LS and CS. CONCLUSIONS IEJ anastomosis generated better results than EEJ. LS was associated with a better patient eating experience, but more diarrhea and reflux compared with CS. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes show the superiority of IEJ with the LS reconstruction method in MITG for GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjia Yan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Daohan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kelly Mahuron
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Li Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhicheng Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Laleh Melstrom
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Chuan Li
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - I Benjamin Paz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Weidong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Weihua Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
- Cancer Immunotherapeutics Program, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hu ZH, Wang JT, Li RX, Wang GJ, Gao BL. Short-term efficacy of additional laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:354. [PMID: 37697006 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03085-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate short-term efficacy of direct laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy (LAG) versus non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) plus additional LAG for early gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS 286 patients were retrospectively assigned into two groups: direct LAG group (n = 255) and additional LAG (ESD plus LAG, n = 31) group. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to equalize relevant confounding factors between two groups for analysis. RESULTS Ninety-three patients were successfully matched, including 62 in the direct LAG group and 31 in the additional LAG group. A significant (P = 0.013) difference existed in the drainage removal time between the additional LAG and direct LAG group (7 d vs. 6 d). Age, sex, tumor location and surgical approach were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications, with age ≥ 60 years (P = 0.002) and total gastrectomy (P = 0.011) as significant independent risk factors. A significant (P = 0.023) difference existed in the surgical time between the early and late groups (193.3 ± 37.6 min vs. 165.5 ± 25.1 min). CONCLUSION Additional LAG (D1 + lymphadenectomy) after ESD may be safe and effective even though non-curative ESD may prolong the drainage removal time and increase the difficulty of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Hao Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Jing-Tao Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Rui-Xin Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Guo-Jun Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
| | - Bu-Lang Gao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Matsui R, Nunobe S, Makuuchi R, Hayami M, Ida S, Kumagai K, Ohashi M, Sano T. Relationship between antithrombotic drugs and postoperative outcomes in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a propensity matching analysis. Gastric Cancer 2023; 26:833-842. [PMID: 37328674 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01410-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As there is no consensus on the impact of antithrombotic drugs on post-gastrectomy outcomes in gastric cancer patients, this study aimed to investigate the impact of antithrombotic drugs on postoperative outcomes in these patients after gastrectomy. METHODS Patients with Stage I-III primary gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy between April 2005 and May 2022 were included. We performed propensity score matching to adjust for patient background and compared bleeding complications. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with bleeding complications. RESULTS Of the 6798 patients, 310 (4.6%) were in the antithrombotic group and 6488 (95.4%) were in the non-antithrombotic group. Twenty-six patients (0.38%) experienced bleeding complications. After matching, the number of patients in each group was 300, with insignificant differences in any factor. A comparison of postoperative outcomes showed no difference in bleeding complications (P = 0.249). In the antithrombotic group, 39 (12.6%) continued drugs, and 271 (87.4%) discontinued them before surgery. After matching, there were 30 and 60 patients, respectively, with no differences in patient background. A comparison of postoperative outcomes showed no differences in bleeding complications (P = 0.551). In multivariate analysis, antithrombotic drug use and continuation of antiplatelet agents were not risk factors for bleeding complications. CONCLUSION Antithrombotic drugs and its continuation may not worsen bleeding complications in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy. Bleeding complications were rare, and further studies are needed on risk factors for bleeding complications in larger databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Souya Nunobe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Rie Makuuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Masaru Hayami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Koshi Kumagai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Manabu Ohashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yanagimoto Y, Kurokawa Y, Doki Y. Essential updates 2021/2022: Perioperative and surgical treatments for gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:698-708. [PMID: 37663969 PMCID: PMC10472390 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, important clinical trials for gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) have been reported, changing the strategies of surgical and perioperative treatment. Although laparoscopic gastrectomy has already been shown to be effective for early-stage cancer, recent evidence from both Asia (JLSSG0901, CLASS-01 and KLASS-02) and Europe (LOGICA and STOMACH trials) has demonstrated that it is useful for advanced GC. Robotic surgery has been rapidly gaining popularity in recent years, and randomized controlled trials are ongoing to evaluate its efficacy. A prospective nationwide multicenter study mapped sites with frequent metastasis and revealed lymphatic flow specific to EGJC, thus establishing the optimal lymph node dissection area and surgical approach based on esophageal involvement. Perioperative chemotherapy, the mainstay of treatment in Europe, also has been established in Asia by the PRODIGY and RESOLVE studies. New clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy or molecular-targeted therapy with perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. In this review, we present important recent clinical trials regarding the treatment of GC and EGJC published in 2021 or 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen Y, Yang Z, Zhao M, Xu C, Zhu Y, Zhang H, Huang H, Peng Y, Hu Y, Lin T, Chen T, Chen H, Zhao L, Liu H, Li G, Yu J, Chen X. Impact of preoperative therapy on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2023; 35:354-364. [PMID: 37691897 PMCID: PMC10485917 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.04.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective As laparoscopic surgery is widely applied for primarily treated gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) and gains many advantages, the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for GC/GEJC patients who have received preoperative therapy (PT) has come to the fore. This study aims to analyze the safety and feasibility of LTG after PT for GC/GEJC patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 511 patients with GC/GEJC undergoing LTG, of which 405 received LTG (LTG group) and 106 received PT+LTG (PT-LTG group) at Nanfang Hospital between June 2018 and September 2022. The surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical duration was significantly longer in the PT-LTG group (P<0.001), while the incidence of intraoperative complications (P=1.000), postoperative complications (LTG group vs. PT-LTG group: 26.2% vs. 23.6%, P=0.587), the classification of complication severity (P=0.271), and postoperative recovery was similar between two groups. Notably, the incidence of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy was also comparable between the two groups (LTG group vs. PT-LTG group: 5.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.918). The univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed that positive proximal margin [positive vs. negative: odds ratio (OR)=14.094, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.639-75.260, P=0.002], rather than PT, has an impact on anastomotic complications after LTG (OR=0.945, 95% CI: 0.371-2.408, P=0.905). Conclusions PT did not increase the surgical risk of LTG for GC/GEJC. Therefore, considering the positive effect of PT on long-term survival, the broader application of PT and LTG for GC/GEJC is supported by our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuehong Chen
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Zhijing Yang
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Mingli Zhao
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Chuanjin Xu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Yuxuan Zhu
- The First Clinical Medical School, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Huimin Zhang
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Huilin Huang
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Yanmei Peng
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Yanfeng Hu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Tian Lin
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Liying Zhao
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Guoxin Li
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Jiang Yu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Xinhua Chen
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Su H, Bu Z. Research progress of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2023; 35:343-353. [PMID: 37691896 PMCID: PMC10485916 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.04.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the first laparoscopic radical surgery for early gastric cancer 30 years ago, there has been a gradual shift from "open" to "minimally invasive" surgery for gastric cancer. This transition is due to advancements in refined anatomy, enlarged field of view, faster recovery, and comparable oncological outcomes. Several high-quality clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy in the treatment of both early and locally advanced gastric cancer. The role of perioperative chemotherapy in managing locally advanced gastric cancer has been widely recognized, and there have been continuous breakthroughs in the exploration of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for perioperative treatment. Additionally, the application of indocyanine green near-infrared imaging technology, 3D laparoscopic technology, and robotic surgery systems has further improved the accuracy and minimally invasive nature of gastric cancer surgeries. Looking ahead, the field of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer is expected to become more standardized, resulting in a significant enhancement in the quality of life for gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Su
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Center of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhaode Bu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Center of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
He H, Lin C, Li R, Zang L, Huang X, Liu F. Surgeons' mental distress and risks after severe complications following radical gastrectomy in China: a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2179-2184. [PMID: 37158145 PMCID: PMC10442099 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to investigate incidences of surgeons' mental distress following severe complications after radical gastrectomy. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 among Chinese general and/or gastrointestinal surgeons who experienced severe complications after radical gastrectomy. The clinical features collected in the questionnaire included: (i) feeling burnout, anxiety, or depression; (ii) avoiding radical gastrectomy or feeling stress, slowing down the process during radical gastrectomy operations; (iii) having physical reactions, including heart pounding, trouble breathing, or sweating while recalling; (iv) having urges to quit being a surgeon; (v) taking psychiatric medications; and (vi) seeking psychological counselling. Analyses were performed to identify risk factors of severe mental distress, which was defined as meeting three or more of the above-mentioned clinical features. RESULTS A total of 1062 valid questionnaires were received. The survey showed that most of the participating surgeons (69.02%) had at least one clinical feature of mental distress following severe complications after radical gastrectomy, and more than 25% of the surgeons suffered from severe mental distress. Surgeons from non-university affiliated hospitals, the junior surgeons, and existing violent doctor-patient conflicts were recognized as independent risk factors for surgeons' severe mental distress related to the severe complications after radical gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS About 70% of surgeons had mental health problems following severe complications after radical gastrectomy, and more than 25% of the surgeons suffered from severe mental distress. More strategies and policies are needed to improve the mental well-being of these surgeons after such incidences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyong He
- Departments of Emergency Surgery
- General Surgery
| | - Chao Lin
- Departments of Emergency Surgery
- General Surgery
| | - Ruochen Li
- Departments of Emergency Surgery
- General Surgery
| | - Lu Zang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Psychology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shen J, Feng X, Li Z, Wang Y. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy performed by the same surgical team during the same period. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1174396. [PMID: 37483520 PMCID: PMC10357816 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1174396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and robotic distal gastrectomy performed during the same period. Methods This study enrolled 46 cases of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and 67 cases of robotic distal gastrectomy that were performed by a single surgeon between April 2020 to October 2021. Baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes of these two groups were then compared. Moreover, the robotic distal gastrectomy group was further divided into two subgroups according to the learning curve. Finally, the baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes of both subgroups were compared with the laparoscopic group, respectively. Results The baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes of the LDG group and RDG group were comparable. In contrast, the operation time in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the early experience robotic group (191.3 ± 37.6 VS 225.1 ± 49, P=0.001). However, the operation time (191.3 ± 37.6 VS 185.3 ± 25.3, P=0.434) was comparable between the laparoscopic group and the late experience robotic group. Likewise, the bleeding volume was comparable between the laparoscopic and early experience robotic groups. However, bleeding volume was significantly lower in the late experience robotic group compared to that in the laparoscopic group (37.5 ± 18.8 VS 49.2 ± 29.0, P=0.049). Conclusions With surgeons stepping into the stable stage of the robotic learning curve, RDG showed a comparable operation time and lower volume of blood loss compared with LDG. Collectively, our study supports the application of robotic distal gastrectomy in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hirata Y, Noorani A, Song S, Wang L, Ajani JA. Early stage gastric adenocarcinoma: clinical and molecular landscapes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:453-469. [PMID: 37264184 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00767-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Gastric adenocarcinoma, even when diagnosed at an early (localized) disease stage, poses a major health-care burden with cure rates that remain unsatisfactorily low, particularly in Western countries. This lack of progress reflects, among other aspects, the impracticality of early diagnosis, considerable variations in therapeutic approaches that is partly based on regional preferences, and the ingrained heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma cells and their associated tumour microenvironment (TME). Clinical trials have long applied empirical interventions with the assumption that all early stage gastric adenocarcinomas are alike. Despite certain successes, the shortcomings of these approaches can potentially be overcome by targeting the specific molecular subsets of gastric adenocarcinomas identified by genomic and/or multi-omics analyses, including microsatellite instability-high, Epstein-Barr virus-induced, DNA damage repair-deficient, HER2-positive and PD-L1-high subtypes. Future approaches, including the availability of sophisticated vaccines, novel antibody technologies, agents targeting TME components (including fibroblasts, macrophages, cytokines or chemokines, and T cells) and novel immune checkpoint inhibitors, supported by improved tissue-based and blood-based diagnostic assays, seem promising. In this Review, we highlight current knowledge of the molecular and cellular biology of gastric adenocarcinomas, summarize the current approaches to clinical management of the disease, and consider the role of novel management and/or treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hirata
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ayesha Noorani
- Cancer Ageing and Somatic Mutation Group, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Cambridge Oesophago-gastric Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shumei Song
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pang HY, Chen LH, Chen XF, Yan MH, Chen ZX, Sun H. Prophylactic drainage versus non-drainage following gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:166. [PMID: 37270519 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03054-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of prophylactic drainage (PD) in gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) is not well-established. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes between the PD and non-drainage (ND) in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy. METHODS A systematic review of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was performed up to December 2022. All eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included and meta-analyzed separately. The registration number of this protocol is PROSPERO CRD42022371102. RESULTS Overall, 7 RCTs (783 patients) and 14 observational studies (4359 patients) were ultimately included. Data from RCTs indicated that patients in the ND group had a lower total complications rate (OR = 0.68; 95%CI:0.47-0.98; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%), earlier time to soft diet (MD = - 0.27; 95%CI: - 0.55 to 0.00; P = 0.05; I2 = 0%) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD = - 0.98; 95%CI: - 1.71 to - 0.26; P = 0.007; I2 = 40%). While other outcomes including anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, pancreatic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, surgical-site infection, pulmonary infection, need for additional drainage, reoperation rate, readmission rate, and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. Meta-analyses on observational studies showed good agreement with the pooled results from RCTs, with higher statistical power. CONCLUSION The present meta-analysis suggests that routine use of PD may not be necessary and even harmful in GC patients following gastrectomy. However, well-designed RCTs with risk-stratified randomization are still needed to validate the results of our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Yang Pang
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Li-Hui Chen
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiu-Feng Chen
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Meng-Hua Yan
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhi-Xiong Chen
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hao Sun
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liang W, Huang J, Song L, Cui H, Yuan Z, Chen R, Zhang P, Zhang Q, Wang N, Cui J, Wei B. Five-year long-term comparison of robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large single-center cohort study. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10125-7. [PMID: 37208483 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10125-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been reported to be technically feasible and safe for patients with gastric cancer. However, 5-year long-term survival and recurrence outcomes for advanced gastric cancer have rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes between RG and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer. METHODS The general clinicopathological data of 1905 consecutive patients who underwent RG and LG were retrospectively collected at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between November 2011 and October 2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match groups. The primary endpoints were 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS After PSM, a well-balanced cohort of 283 patients in the RG group and 701 patients in the LG group were included in the analysis. The 5-year cumulative DFS rates were 67.28% in the robotic group and 70.41% in the laparoscopic group. The 5-year OS rate was 69.01% in the robotic group and 69.58% in the laparoscopic group. No significant differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves for DFS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.83-1.39, Log-rank P = 0.557) and OS (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.78-1.34, Log-rank P = 0.850) were observed between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analyses for potential confounding variables, there were no significant differences in 5-year DFS and 5-year OS survival between the 2 groups (P > 0.05), except for patients with pathological stage III and pathological stage N3 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION For patients with early gastric cancer, robotic and laparoscopic approaches have similar long-term survival. For patients with advanced gastric cancer, further studies need to be conducted to assess the long-term survival outcomes of RG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenquan Liang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Liqiang Song
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hao Cui
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhen Yuan
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Runkai Chen
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Peixuan Zhang
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Qingpeng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jianxin Cui
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Bo Wei
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zheng HL, Shen LL, Xu BB, Chen QY, Lu J, Xue Z, Xie JW, Li P, Huang CM, Zheng CH. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical total gastrectomy for upper-middle gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a study of real-world data. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10084-z. [PMID: 37198408 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10084-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic technique has been increasingly used in gastrectomy, but the safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for advanced proximal gastric cancer (PGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 146 patients who received NAC followed by radical total gastrectomy at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018 was performed. The primary endpoints were long-term outcomes. RESULTS The patients were divided into two groups: 89 were in the LTG group and 57 were in the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group. The LTG group had a significantly shorter operative time (median 173 min vs. 215 min, p < 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (62 ml vs. 135 ml, p < 0.001), higher total lymph node (LN) dissections (36 vs 31, p = 0.043), and higher total chemotherapy cycle completion rate (≥ 8 cycles) (37.1% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.027) than OTG. The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the LTG group was significantly higher than that of the OTG group (60.7% vs. 35%, p = 0.0013). Survival with inverse probability weighting(IPW) correction for Lauren type, ypTNM stage, NAC schemes and the times at which the surgery was performed showed that there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (p = 0.463). Postoperative complications (25.8% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.215) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.561) between the LTG and OTG groups were also comparable. CONCLUSION In experienced gastric cancer surgery centers, LTG is recommended as the preferred option for such patients who performed NAC, owing to its long-term survival is not inferior to OTG, and it offers less intraoperative bleeding, better chemotherapy tolerance than conventional open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Long Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Li-Li Shen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Bin-Bin Xu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhen Xue
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jia Z, Cao S, Meng C, Liu X, Li Z, Tian Y, Yu J, Sun Y, Xu J, Liu G, Zhang X, Yang H, Zhong H, Wang Q, Zhou Y. Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high-volume center retrospective propensity score matching study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:10485-10498. [PMID: 36924361 PMCID: PMC10225175 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared. RESULTS After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three-year overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) were observed. CONCLUSIONS Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short-term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long-term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoyu Jia
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Shougen Cao
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Cheng Meng
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Xiaodong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Zequn Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Yulong Tian
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Junjian Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Yuqi Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Jianfei Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Gan Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Xingqi Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Hao Zhong
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Qingrui Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| | - Yanbing Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational MedicineQingdaoChina
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shibasaki S, Suda K, Hisamori S, Obama K, Terashima M, Uyama I. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review and future directions. Gastric Cancer 2023; 26:325-338. [PMID: 37010634 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01389-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic gastrectomy (RG) using the da Vinci Surgical System for gastric cancer was approved for national medical insurance coverage in Japan in April 2018, and its number has been rapidly increasing since then. AIM We reviewed and compared current evidence on RG and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) to identify the differences in surgical outcomes. METHODS Three independent reviewers systematically reviewed the data collected from a comprehensive literature search by an independent organization, focusing on the following nine endpoints: mortality, morbidity, operative time, estimated blood loss volume, length of postoperative hospital stay, long-term oncologic outcome, quality of life, learning curve, and cost. RESULTS Compared to LG, RG has lower intraoperative blood loss volume, shorter length of hospital stay, and shorter learning curve, but both procedures have similar mortality. Contrarily, its disadvantages include longer procedural time and higher costs. Although the morbidity rate and long-term outcomes are almost comparable, RG showed superior potentials. Currently, the outcomes of RG are considered comparable to or better than LG. CONCLUSION RG might be applicable to all gastric cancer patients who fulfill the indication of LG at institutions that meet specific criteria and are approved to claim the National Health Insurance costs for the use of the surgical robot in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susumu Shibasaki
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Koichi Suda
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
- Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Intelligence, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Shigeo Hisamori
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54, Shogoin-Kawahara, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54, Shogoin-Kawahara, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Masanori Terashima
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Sunto, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
- Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Technology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Long VD, Dat TQ, Thong DQ, Hai NV, Le Minh Quoc H, Nguyen DT, Minh TA, Anh NVT, Vuong NL, So J, Terashima M, Bac NH. Long-Term Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for T4a Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2278-2289. [PMID: 36469222 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12897-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer (GC) has been applied more frequently worldwide but is still controversial for patients with serosal invasion (T4a). This study compared short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy (LDG) with open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for T4a GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied 472 patients with T4a gastric adenocarcinoma in the lower or middle third of the stomach: 231 underwent LDG and 241 underwent ODG between 2013 and 2020. Short-term outcomes included operative characteristics and complications. Long-term outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline characteristics between groups. RESULTS The PSM strategy resulted in 294 patients (147 in each group). The LDG group had a significantly longer operating time (mean: 200 vs 190 min, p = 0.001) but reduced blood loss (mean: 50 vs 100 ml, p = 0.001). The LDG group had a higher rate of any postoperative complication (23.1% vs 12.2%, p = 0.021) but most were classified as grades I-II according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Grade III-V complications were similar between groups. Five-year OS was 69% versus 60% (p = 0.109) and 5-year DFS was 58% vs 53% (p = 0.3) in LDG and ODG groups, respectively. For tumor size < 5 cm, LDG was better in reduction of blood loss, postoperative hospital length of stay, and OS. CONCLUSIONS LDG is feasible and safe for patients with T4a GC and is comparable to ODG regarding short- and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, LDG can be a favorable option for T4a GC smaller than 5 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vo Duy Long
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
| | - Tran Quang Dat
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Dang Quang Thong
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Viet Hai
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Ho Le Minh Quoc
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Doan Thuy Nguyen
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tran Anh Minh
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Vu Tuan Anh
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Lam Vuong
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
| | - Jimmy So
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Nguyen Hoang Bac
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Aoyama R, Tsunoda S, Okamura R, Yamashita Y, Hata H, Kinjo Y, Miki A, Kanaya S, Yamamoto M, Matsuo K, Manaka D, Tanaka E, Kawada H, Kondo M, Itami A, Kan T, Kadokawa Y, Ito T, Hirai K, Hosogi H, Nishigori T, Hisamori S, Hoshino N, Hida K, Goto Y, Nakayama T, Obama K. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Remnant Gastric Cancer: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3605-3614. [PMID: 36808589 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13232-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite growing evidence of the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for primary gastric cancer, MIS for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains controversial due to the rarity of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of MIS for radical resection of RGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RGC who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2020 at 17 institutions were included, and a propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of MIS with open surgery. RESULTS A total of 327 patients were included in this study and 186 patients were analyzed after matching. The risk ratios for overall and severe complications were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45, 1.27] and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.29), respectively. The MIS group had significantly less blood loss [mean difference (MD), -409 mL; 95% CI: -538, -281] and a shorter hospital stay (MD, -6.5 days; 95% CI: -13.1, 0.1) than the open surgery group. The median follow-up duration of this cohort was 4.6 years, and the 3-year overall survival were 77.9% and 76.2% in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.36]. The 3-year relapse-free survival were 71.9% and 62.2% in the MIS and open surgery groups, respectively (HR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.16). CONCLUSIONS MIS for RGC showed favorable short- and long-term outcomes compared to open surgery. MIS is a promising option for radical surgery for RGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryuhei Aoyama
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shigeru Tsunoda
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. .,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Ryosuke Okamura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshito Yamashita
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Hata
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Kinjo
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Himeji Medical Center, Himeji, Japan
| | - Akira Miki
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Toyooka Hospital, Toyooka, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Kanaya
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michihiro Yamamoto
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Koichi Matsuo
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Dai Manaka
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Eiji Tanaka
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hironori Kawada
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Masato Kondo
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Atsushi Itami
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takatsugu Kan
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshio Kadokawa
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ito
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Saiseikai-Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Hirai
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Otsu City Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Hisahiro Hosogi
- Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tatsuto Nishigori
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shigeo Hisamori
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Hoshino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Goto
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Kyoto Esophageal and Gastric Surgery Study Group, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
SMYD Family Members Serve as Potential Prognostic Markers and Correlate with Immune Infiltrates in Gastric Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2023; 2023:6032864. [PMID: 36816359 PMCID: PMC9929213 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6032864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Background The SMYD family comprises a group of genes encoding lysine methyltransferases, which are closely related to tumorigenesis. However, a systematic understanding of their role in gastric cancer (GC) is lacking. Methods Using databases and tools such as the Cancer Genome Atlas, Human Protein Atlas, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, and Metascape, we comprehensively analyzed differences in SMYD expression and its prognostic value as well as the association of SMYDs with immune cell infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). We conducted functional enrichment analysis and explored a competing endogenous RNA mechanism regulating SMYD mRNA and protein levels in patients with GC. Results In GC, the expression of SMYD2/3/4/5 mRNA was significantly upregulated, as opposed to that of SMYD1 mRNA, which was significantly downregulated. The protein levels of SMYDs were consistent with mRNA levels. SMYD1/2/4/5 was negatively correlated with overall survival; SMYD1/2/3/5 was negatively correlated with progression-free survival. Our SMYD-based signature and nomogram model may be useful for inferring the prognosis of GC. All SMYDs were closely associated with the infiltration of six immune cell types: uncharacterized, CD8+ T, CD4+ T, macrophage, endothelial, and B cells. TMB was significantly negatively correlated with SMYD1 expression, while a significant positive correlation was observed with SMYD2/5. Furthermore, MSI was significantly positively correlated with SMYD2/5 expression. Long non-coding RNAs, such as chr22-38_28785274-29006793.1, XLOC_002309, and CTD-2008N3.1, were suggested to regulate SMYD expression by sponging multiple microRNAs. Conclusion SMYDs are differentially expressed in GC and are thus potential prognostic markers. SMYD expression is closely related to immune infiltration, TMB, and MSI, all of which are closely related to the response to targeted immune therapy.
Collapse
|
50
|
Beyer K. Surgery Matters: Progress in Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:108-129. [PMID: 36656504 PMCID: PMC9883345 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-01042-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma has progressed significantly in the past few decades. A major milestone was the establishment of multimodal therapies for locally advanced tumours. Improvements in the technique of endoscopic resection have supplanted surgery in the early stages of many cases of gastric cancer. In cases in which an endoscopic resection is not possible, surgical limited resection procedures for the early stages of carcinoma are an equal alternative to gastrectomy in the field of oncology. Proximal gastrectomy is extensively discussed in this context. Whether proximal gastrectomy leads to a better quality of life and better nutritional well-being than total gastrectomy depends on the reconstruction chosen. The outcome cannot be conclusively assessed at present. For locally advanced stages, total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is now the global standard. A subtotal gastrectomy requires sufficiently long tumour-free proximal resection margins. Recent data indicate that proximal margins of at least 3 cm for tumours with an expansive growth pattern and at least 5 cm for those with an infiltrative growth pattern are sufficient. The most frequently performed reconstruction worldwide following gastrectomy is the Roux-en-Y reconstruction. However, there is evidence that pouch reconstruction is superior in terms of quality of life and nutritional well-being. Oncological gastric surgery is increasingly being performed laparoscopically. The safety and oncological equivalency were first demonstrated for early carcinomas and then for locally advanced tumours, by cohort studies and RCTs. Some studies suggest that laparoscopic procedures may be advantageous in early postoperative recovery. Robotic gastrectomy is also increasing in use. Preliminary results suggest that robotic gastrectomy may have added value in lymphadenectomy and in the early postoperative course. However, further studies are needed to substantiate these results. There is an ongoing debate about the best treatment option for gastric cancer with oligometastatic disease. Preliminary results indicate that certain patient groups could benefit from resection of the primary tumour and metastases following chemotherapy. However, the exact conditions in which patients may benefit have yet to be confirmed by ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Beyer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|