1
|
Goel S, Negassa A, Ghalib MH, Chaudhary I, Desai K, Shah U, Swami U, Cohen B, Maitra R, Mani S. Outcomes Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Advanced Cancers in Phase 1 Trials: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2421485. [PMID: 38990570 PMCID: PMC11240188 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (eg, Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients) have low representation in clinical trials, especially in phase 1 trials in cancer. These trials represent valuable options for patients with advanced cancer who experience disease progression with standard therapy. Objective To determine whether the benefit of enrollment to phase 1 cancer trials extends to Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients as much as it does for non-Hispanic White patients. Data Sources Patient records at a single institution from January 1999 to December 2016 were reviewed. Treatment-related responses, toxic effects, and deaths were recorded. Study Selection All phase 1 studies were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data underwent independent extraction by multiple observers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), assessed using univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses. Results A total of 738 patients (median [range], 60 [22-93] years; 467 [63.3] female) including 197 Hispanic patients (26.7%), 238 non-Hispanic Black patients (32.2%), and 282 non-Hispanic White patients (38.2%), were enrolled in 64 phase 1 trials, including 33 cytotoxic trials (51.5%), 21 biologic trials (32.8%), and 10 combined therapy trials (15.6%). The primary cancer diagnoses were colorectal (187 patients [25.3%]), ovarian (141 patients [19.1%]), lung (58 patients [7.9%]), uterine (49 patients [6.6%]), and breast (41 patients [5.6%]). Patients underwent a median (range) of 3 (0-13) therapies prior to trial enrollment. Among 558 patients evaluated for response, the clinical benefit rate (ie, stable disease plus response rates) was 49.1%, and the overall response rate was 6.5%. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxic effects were observed in 27.8% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.3%) of patients and grade 3 or 4 hematological toxic effects were observed in 19.7% (95% CI, 17.0%-22.8%) of patients. The treatment-related mortality rate was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.9%). Median OS was 9.6 (95% CI, 8.2-11.0) months among Hispanic patients, 8.3 (95% CI, 6.7-10.4) months among non-Hispanic Black patients, and 9.8 (95% CI, 8.5-11.4) months among non-Hispanic White patients (P = .13). In a multivariable analysis, age older than 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or greater, more than 2 metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase grade 1 or 2, grade 2 or greater low albumin, grade 1 or greater total bilirubin, and grade 2 or greater anemia were associated with worse prognosis, whereas leukocytosis greater than grade 1 was associated with better OS. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis assessing outcomes in phase 1 cancer trials among patients from racial and ethnic minority groups, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients had benefits similar to those of non-Hispanic White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Goel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Formerly at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
- Formerly at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Abdissa Negassa
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Mohammad H. Ghalib
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Imran Chaudhary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Kavita Desai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Umang Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Umang Swami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Bruce Cohen
- Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Radhashree Maitra
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
- Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Sridhar Mani
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
- Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perni S, Jimenez R, Jagsi R. Optimizing Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:349-357. [PMID: 37684064 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
The concept of informed consent has evolved considerably over the course of the 20th century, leading to its establishment as a foundational ethical principle for the conduct of biomedical research in the United States. Even though it is now a highly regulated part of cancer research, the process of obtaining informed consent is often impeded by systemic, clinician, and patient factors that require both small- and large-scale intervention. New challenges and considerations continue to emerge due to innovations in clinical trial design, increases in utilization of genomic sequencing, and advances in genomic editing and artificial intelligence. We present a review of the history, policy, pragmatic challenges, and evolving role of the central ethical tenet of informed consent in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subha Perni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burnett AL, Nyame YA, Mitchell E. Disparities in prostate cancer. J Natl Med Assoc 2023; 115:S38-S45. [PMID: 37202002 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in early detection/prevention and treatments, and improved outcomes in recent decades, prostate cancer continues to disproportionately affect Black men and is the secondleading cause of cancer death in this subgroup. Black men are substantially more likely to develop prostate cancer and are twice as likely to die from the disease compared with White men. In addition, Black men are younger at diagnosis and face a higher risk of aggressive disease relative to White men. Striking racial disparities endure along the continuum of prostate cancer care, including screening, genomic testing, diagnostic procedures, and treatment modalities. The underlying causes of these inequalities are complex and multifactorial and involve biological factors, structural determinants of equity (i.e., public policy, structural and systemic racism, economic policy), social determinants of health (including income, education, and insurance status, neighborhood/physical environment, community/social context, and geography), and health care factors. The objective of this article is to review the sources of racial disparities in prostate cancer and to propose actionable recommendations to help address these inequities and narrow the racial gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Urology, University of Washington, United States
| | - Edith Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer at Jefferson, 925 Chestnut Street, Suite 220A, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lucero KT, Obodozie-Ofoegbu OO, Nooruddin Z, Ryan K, Castillo A, Moore AM, Jones X, Frei CR. Health disparity in use of novel agents for first-line therapy in Black and White patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2023; 29:420-430. [PMID: 36989449 PMCID: PMC10387978 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.4.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Novel agents (NAs) (ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax) were first introduced in 2013 as therapeutic options to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). OBJECTIVES: To determine if the uptake of NAs for first-line treatment was similar in Black and White patients with CLL treated in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including adults with CLL managed in the VA from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic data, and appropriate bivariable statistical tests were used to compare NA use, baseline characteristics, health outcomes, and complications. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with uptake of NAs. The study included 565 patients; 86% were White and 14% were Black. Black patients were younger than White patients (median age [66 vs 69 years; P < 0.01]) but had similar median baseline Charlson comorbidity scores (4 vs 5). RESULTS: Overall, Black patients were less likely to receive NAs than White patients (14% vs 26%; P = 0.02). The gap narrowed over the study period: 4% vs 17% (2014), 13% vs 25% (2015), 17% vs 33% (2016), and 31% vs 33% (2017). Black race (P = 0.02) and fiscal year (P < 0.01) were the only variables significantly associated with NA use in the multivariable model. Health outcomes and most complications were similar for Black and White patients despite the difference in prescribing patterns. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify a potential health disparity with respect to use of NAs among Black and White patients with CLL treated in the VA. Fortunately, health outcomes and most complications were similar for Black and White patients despite the difference in prescribing patterns. DISCLOSURES: Funding for the study was provided by AstraZeneca as a research grant to the Foundation for Advancing Veterans' Health Research (FAVHR), a non-profit entity within the Audie L. Murphy Veterans Hospital, San Antonio, TX. Drs Nooruddin and Frei have received research grants (paid to FAVHR) from AstraZeneca in the last 3 years. Ms Ryan is an employee of AstraZeneca. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, or the authors' affiliated institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kana Tai Lucero
- Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio
| | - Obiageri O Obodozie-Ofoegbu
- Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio
| | - Zohra Nooruddin
- Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio
| | - Kellie Ryan
- AstraZeneca US Medical Affairs, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Alyssa Castillo
- Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio
| | - Amanda M Moore
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio
| | - Xavier Jones
- Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio
| | - Christopher R Frei
- Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio
- University Health System, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eggly S, Senft N, Kim S, Heath EI, Jang H, Moore TF, Baidoun F, Manning MA, Penner LA, Albrecht TL, Carducci MA, Lansey D, Hamel LM. Addressing multilevel barriers to clinical trial participation among Black and White men with prostate cancer through the
PACCT
study. Cancer Med 2022; 12:8604-8613. [PMID: 36540051 PMCID: PMC10134336 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer clinical trial participation is low and inequitable. Partnering Around Cancer Clinical Trials (PACCT) addressed systemic and interpersonal barriers through an observational study of eligibility and an intervention to improve patient-physician communication and trial invitation rates. METHODS Physicians at two comprehensive cancer centers and Black and White men with prostate cancer participated. Patients were followed for 2 years to determine whether they became potentially eligible for an available therapeutic trial. Potentially eligible patients were randomized to receive a trials-focused Question Prompt List or usual care. Patient-physician interactions were video-recorded. Outcomes included communication quality and trial invitation rates. Descriptive analyses assessed associations between sociodemographic characteristics and eligibility and effects of the intervention on outcomes. RESULTS Only 44 (22.1%) of participating patients (n = 199) became potentially eligible for an available clinical trial. Patients with higher incomes were more often eligible (>$80,000 vs. <$40,000, adjusted OR = 6.06 [SD, 1.97]; $40,000-$79,000 vs. <$40,000, adjusted OR = 4.40 [SD, 1.81]). Among eligible patients randomized to the intervention (n = 19) or usual care (n = 25), Black patients randomized to the intervention reported participating more actively than usual care patients, while White intervention patients reported participating less actively (difference, 0.41 vs. -0.34). Intervention patients received more trial invitations than usual care patients (73.7% vs. 60.0%); this effect was greater for Black (80.0% vs. 30.0%) than White patients (80.0% vs. 66.7%). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest the greatest enrollment barrier is eligibility for an available trial, but a communication intervention can improve communication quality and trial invitation rates, especially for eligible Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Eggly
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Nicole Senft
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Seongho Kim
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Elisabeth I. Heath
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Hyejeong Jang
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Tanina F. Moore
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Fatmeh Baidoun
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Mark A. Manning
- Department of Psychology Oakland University Rochester Michigan USA
| | - Louis A. Penner
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Terrance L. Albrecht
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Michael A. Carducci
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Dina Lansey
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Lauren M. Hamel
- Department of Oncology Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit Michigan USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thominet L, Hamel LM, Baidoun F, Moore TF, Barton E, Heath EI, Carducci M, Lansey D, Eggly S. Physicians' use of plain language during discussions of prostate cancer clinical trials with patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3453-3458. [PMID: 36085183 PMCID: PMC9675686 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study described physicians' use of plain language during patient-physician cancer clinical trial discussions. METHODS Video-recorded clinical interactions and accompanying transcripts were taken from a larger study of communication and clinical trials (PACCT). Interactions (n = 25) were selected if they included invitations to participate in a clinical trial. We used descriptive, qualitative discourse analysis, a method that identifies language patterns at or above the sentence level. We first excerpted discussions of clinical trials, then identified instances of plain language within those discussions. Finally, we inductively coded those instances to describe physicians' plain language practices. RESULTS The analysis identified four plain language practices. Lexical simplification replaced medical terminology with simpler words. Patient-centered definition named, categorized, and explained complex medical terminology. Metaphor explained medical terminology by comparing it with known concepts. Finally, experience-focused description replaced medical terminology with descriptions of patients' potential physical experiences. CONCLUSION These plain language practices hold promise as part of effective information exchange in discussions of cancer clinical trials. Testing is needed to identify patient preferences and the extent to which these practices address patient health literacy needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Pending further testing, these plain language practices may be integrated into physician clinical trial and other communication training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Thominet
- Department of English, Floria International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Lauren M Hamel
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
| | - Fatmeh Baidoun
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
| | - Tanina F Moore
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
| | - Ellen Barton
- Linguistics Program, Department of English, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
| | - Elisabeth I Heath
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
| | - Michael Carducci
- Johns Hopkins Medicine/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Dina Lansey
- Johns Hopkins Medicine/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Susan Eggly
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu Y, Kang R, Zheng H, Wang P, Jiang W, Xiong B, Chen J, Xu J. Female Colon Cancer Metastasis Pattern and Prognosis: A SEER-Based Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:3865601. [PMID: 35845938 PMCID: PMC9283037 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3865601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the metastatic pattern and prognosis of female colon cancer (FCC) to that of male colon cancer (MCC) to ascertain the independent factors impacting the prognosis of patients with FCC. The data of the present study population were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Descriptive analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox regression were used to evaluated FCC characteristics and factors associated with prognosis. There were 56,442 patients diagnosed with FCC, of whom 8,817 had distant metastases. Compared to patients with nonmetastatic FCC, a greater proportion of metastatic FCC patients was less than 60 years of age, black race, and grade III-IV. The primary sites were mainly located on the left side and have more possibility to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Compared to metastatic MCC, a higher proportion of metastatic FCC patients ranged over 60 years of age, black race, treated without chemotherapy, and insurance, while the primary site was located on the right side. Liver and lung were the two most common sites of solitary metastases in CC, and among patients with solitary metastases in CC, patients who had lung metastases had a better prognosis than those who developed other types of metastasizes. Patients with FCC with metastases of the liver had a worse prognosis than their MCC counterparts. Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that the risk ratio was higher in metastatic FCC patients compared to those without metastases. We report the survival comparison of metastatic FCC with nonmetastatic FCC through the SEER database. Our results suggest that it has unique clinicopathological features and differs from metastatic MCC. Furthermore, patients with liver metastatic FCC have a worse prognosis than those with MCC. Emphasis on screening for colon cancer in women and additional clinical care should be paid for, especially for patients with FCC with metastatic liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yurong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Rongbin Kang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Huida Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Pengcheng Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Weixin Jiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Jintao Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jianhua Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sentana-Lledo D, Sartor O, Balk SP, Einstein DJ. Immune mechanisms behind prostate cancer in men of African ancestry: A review. Prostate 2022; 82:883-893. [PMID: 35254710 PMCID: PMC9875381 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men of African ancestry (AA) with prostate cancer suffer from worse outcomes. However, a recent analysis of patients treated with the dendritic cell vaccine sipuleucel-T for prostate cancer suggested that AA patients could have improved outcomes relative to whites. METHODS We conducted a focused literature review of Medline-indexed articles and clinical trials listed on clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS We identify several studies pointing to enrichment of inflammatory cellular infiltrates and cytokine signaling among AA patients with prostate cancer. We outline potential genomic and transcriptomic alterations that may contribute to immunogenicity. Last, we investigate differences in host immunity and vaccine responsiveness that may be enhanced in AA patients. CONCLUSIONS AA patients with prostate cancer may be enriched for an immunogenic phenotype. Dedicated studies are needed to better understand the immune mechanisms that contribute to existing cancer disparities and test immune-based therapies in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sentana-Lledo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Steven P. Balk
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David J. Einstein
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Espinoza-Gutarra MR, Duma N, Aristizabal P, Segarra-Vazquez B, Borno H, Halbert CH, Simon MA, Velazquez AI. The Problem of Hispanic/Latinx Under-Representation in Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:380-384. [PMID: 35544652 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Narjust Duma
- Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paula Aristizabal
- University of California San Diego, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, San Diego, CA.,Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, Peckham Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, San Diego, CA.,University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, Population Sciences Disparities and Community Engagement, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Hala Borno
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Melissa A Simon
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Ana I Velazquez
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jiang S, Hong YA. Clinical trial participation in America: The roles of eHealth engagement and patient-provider communication. Digit Health 2021; 7:20552076211067658. [PMID: 34925874 PMCID: PMC8679028 DOI: 10.1177/20552076211067658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Public participation in a clinical trial is the foundation of clinical
research and the cornerstone for the discovery of new treatment and
improving health outcomes. This study aims to examine how eHealth
engagement, patient–provider communication, and clinical trial knowledge are
associated with clinical trial participation in the United States. Methods Data were drawn from the Health Information National Trends Survey Iteration
5 Cycle 4 conducted in 2020. The sample included 3865 American adults aged
18 years and above. Path analysis using structural equation modeling and
hierarchical linear regression was performed to examine the effects of
eHealth engagement and patient–provider communication on clinical trial
participation. Results About 5% of American adults have ever participated in a clinical trial.
Younger adults, males, minorities, and people with lower education, less
clinical trial knowledge, and less eHealth engagement were less likely to
participate. After controlling for demographic variables, we found that more
eHealth engagement led to a better knowledge of clinical trials, which was
strongly associated with participation. Further, patient-centered
communication did not directly lead to clinical trial participation;
instead, it positively moderated the relationship between clinical trial
knowledge and participation. Conclusions The national survey data indicate that American participation in clinical
trials remains low and a significant disparity exists. Within the context of
the eHealth movement, it is critical to implement targeted interventions to
improve clinical trial knowledge, address the digital divide, and enhance
patient-centered communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaohai Jiang
- Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Both authors contribute equally
| | - Y Alicia Hong
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.,Both authors contribute equally
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ma TM, Romero T, Nickols NG, Rettig MB, Garraway IP, Roach M, Michalski JM, Pisansky TM, Lee WR, Jones CU, Rosenthal SA, Wang C, Hartman H, Nguyen PL, Feng FY, Boutros PC, Saigal C, Chamie K, Jackson WC, Morgan TM, Mehra R, Salami SS, Vince R, Schaeffer EM, Mahal BA, Dess RT, Steinberg ML, Elashoff D, Sandler HM, Spratt DE, Kishan AU. Comparison of Response to Definitive Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer in Black and White Men: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2139769. [PMID: 34964855 PMCID: PMC8717118 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Black men have a 2-fold increased risk of dying from prostate cancer compared with White men. However, race-specific differences in response to initial treatment remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare overall and treatment-specific outcomes of Black and White men with localized prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT). DATA SOURCES A systematic search was performed of relevant published randomized clinical trials conducted by the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2010. This meta-analysis was performed from July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials of definitive RT for patients with localized prostate cancer comprising a substantial number of Black men (self-identified race) enrolled that reported on treatment-specific and overall outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Individual patient data were obtained from 7 NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized clinical trials evaluating definitive RT with or without short- or long-term androgen deprivation therapy. Unadjusted Fine-Gray competing risk models, with death as a competing risk, were developed to evaluate the cumulative incidences of end points. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate differences in all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of distant metastasis (DM) or death. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) of biochemical recurrence (BCR), DM, and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). RESULTS A total of 8814 patients (1630 [18.5%] Black and 7184 [81.5%] White) were included; mean (SD) age was 69.1 (6.8) years. Median follow-up was 10.6 (IQR, 8.0-17.8) years for surviving patients. At enrollment, Black men were more likely to have high-risk disease features. However, even without adjustment, Black men were less likely to experience BCR (sHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91), DM (sHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91), or PCSM (sHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97). No significant differences in all-cause mortality were identified (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92-1.07). Upon adjustment, Black race remained significantly associated with improved BCR (adjusted sHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88; P < .001), DM (adjusted sHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.87; P = .002), and PCSM (adjusted sHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that Black men enrolled in randomized clinical trials present with more aggressive disease but have better BCR, DM, and PCSM with definitive RT compared with White men, suggesting that other determinants of outcome, such as access to care, are important factors of achieving racial equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
| | | | - Nicholas G. Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew B. Rettig
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Isla P. Garraway
- Department of Urology, UCLA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
- Division of Urology, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - W. Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Seth A. Rosenthal
- Sutter Medical Group and Sutter Cancer Centers, Roseville, California
| | - Chenyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Holly Hartman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Paul L. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Paul C. Boutros
- Department of Urology, UCLA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
- Department of Human Genetics, UCLA
| | | | | | | | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Rohit Mehra
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Randy Vince
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Edward M. Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert T. Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | | | - Howard M. Sandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
- Department of Urology, UCLA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Racial and ethnic survival disparities in patients with haematological malignancies in the USA: time to stop ignoring the numbers. THE LANCET HAEMATOLOGY 2021; 8:e947-e954. [DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00303-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
13
|
Hao S, Snyder RA, Irish W, Parikh AA. Association of race and health insurance in treatment disparities of colon cancer: A retrospective analysis utilizing a national population database in the United States. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003842. [PMID: 34695123 PMCID: PMC8575307 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both health insurance status and race independently impact colon cancer (CC) care delivery and outcomes. The relative importance of these factors in explaining racial and insurance disparities is less clear, however. This study aimed to determine the association and interaction of race and insurance with CC treatment disparities. STUDY SETTING Retrospective cohort review of a prospective hospital-based database. METHODS AND FINDINGS In this cross-sectional study, patients diagnosed with stage I to III CC in the United States were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB; 2006 to 2016). Multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were performed to evaluate the association of insurance and race/ethnicity with odds of receipt of surgery (stage I to III) and adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III), with an additional 2-way interaction term to evaluate for effect modification. Confounders included sex, age, median income, rurality, comorbidity, and nodes and margin status for the model for chemotherapy. Of 353,998 patients included, 73.8% (n = 261,349) were non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 11.7% (n = 41,511) were non-Hispanic Black (NHB). NHB patients were less likely to undergo resection [odds ratio (OR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.72, p < 0.001] or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.87, p < 0.001] compared to NHW patients. NHB patients with private or Medicare insurance were less likely to undergo resection [OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p = 0.004 (private insurance); OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.66, p < 0.001 (Medicare)] and to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87, p < 0.001 (private insurance); OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91, p < 0.001 (Medicare)] compared to similarly insured NHW patients. Although Hispanic patients with private and Medicare insurance were also less likely to undergo surgical resection, this was not the case with adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is mainly limited by the retrospective nature and by the variables provided in the dataset; granular details such as continuity or disruption of insurance coverage or specific chemotherapy agents or dosing cannot be assessed within NCDB. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that racial disparities in receipt of treatment for CC persist even among patients with similar health insurance coverage and that different disparities exist for different racial/ethnic groups. Changes in health policy must therefore recognize that provision of insurance alone may not eliminate cancer treatment racial disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett Hao
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A. Snyder
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - William Irish
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Alexander A. Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Williams CP, Senft Everson N, Shelburne N, Norton WE. Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2127792. [PMID: 34586365 PMCID: PMC8482053 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Representative enrollment in clinical trials is critical to ensure equitable and effective translation of research to practice, yet disparities in clinical trial enrollment persist. OBJECTIVE To examine person-level factors associated with invitation to and participation in clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study analyzed responses from 3689 US adults who participated in the nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey, collected February through June 2020 via mailed questionnaires. EXPOSURES Demographic, clinical, and health behavior-related characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES History of invitation to and participation in a clinical trial, primary information sources, trust in information sources, and motives for participation in clinical trials were described. Respondent characteristics are presented as absolute numbers and weighted percentages. Associations between respondent demographic, clinical, and health behavior-related characteristics and clinical trial invitation and participation were estimated using survey-weighted logistic regression models. RESULTS The median (IQR) age of the 3689 respondents was 48 (33-61) years, and most were non-Hispanic White individuals (2063 [59%]; non-Hispanic Black, 452 [10%]; Hispanic, 521 [14%]), had more than a high school degree (2656 [68%]), were employed (1809 [58%]), and had at least 1 medical condition (2535 [61%]). Overall, 439 respondents (9%) had been invited to participate in any clinical trial. Respondents with increased odds of invitation were non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.13-3.02), had greater than a high school education compared with less than high school education (eg, ≥college degree: aOR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.89-12.39), were single compared with married or living as married (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04-2.73), and had at least 1 medical condition compared to none (eg, 1 medical condition: aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.32-3.82). Respondents residing in rural vs urban areas had 77% decreased odds of invitation to a clinical trial (aOR 0.33; 95% CI 0.17-0.65). Of invited respondents, 199 (47%) participated. Compared with non-Hispanic White respondents, non-Hispanic Black respondents had 72% decreased odds of clinical trial participation (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.87). Respondents most frequently reported "health care providers" as the first and most trusted source of clinical trial information (first source: 2297 [59%]; most trusted source: 2597 [70%]). The most frequently reported motives for clinical trials participation were "wanting to get better" (2294 [66%]) and the standard of care not being covered by insurance (1448 [41%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that invitation to and participation in clinical trials may differ by person-level demographic and clinical characteristics. Strategies toward increasing trial invitation and participation rates across diverse patient populations warrant further research to ensure equitable translation of clinical benefits from research to practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P. Williams
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nicole Senft Everson
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nonniekaye Shelburne
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Wynne E. Norton
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Perni S, Moy B, Nipp RD. Disparities in phase 1 cancer clinical trial enrollment. Cancer 2021; 127:4464-4469. [PMID: 34379799 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phase 1 trials are increasingly important in the molecularly driven era of oncology, but few studies have examined phase 1 participation disparities. The authors of this study investigated factors associated with phase 1 versus phase 2/3 trial enrollment. METHODS They authors conducted a cross-sectional study using serial samples of patients age ≥18 years enrolling on cancer trials from October 2011 to November 2014 at an academic cancer center. They used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to analyze sociodemographic and clinical associations with phase 1 versus phase 2/3 trial enrollment. RESULTS Among 3103 patients enrolled in cancer trials, 2657 unique patients participated in phase 1/2/3 trials. For patients enrolled in phase 1 (n = 1401) versus phase 2/3 (n = 1256) trials, we found no significant differences by age, insurance status, marital status, and income. Overall, 1216 (93%) White, 72 (6%) Asian, and 21 (2%) Black patients enrolled on phase 1 trials, whereas 1068 (93%) White, 40 (3%) Asian, and 43 (4%) Black patients enrolled on phase 2/3 trials. Adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, marital status, income, cancer type, disease status, travel distance, and trial year, compared with White patients, Black patients had lower phase 1 enrollment (odds ratio [OR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.82), as did Hispanic/Latino (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79) and male patients (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). Asian patients had higher phase 1 enrollment (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.88-2.16). CONCLUSIONS Disparities in phase 1 versus phase 2/3 cancer clinical trial enrollment underscore the urgent need for interventions addressing inequities in early-phase trial participation. LAY SUMMARY Phase 1 trials are of increasing importance in oncology. The authors of the study analyzed all patients enrolling on cancer clinical trials at a large academic cancer center from October 2011 to November 2014. Among the 2657 trial participants, when age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, marital status, income, cancer type, disease status, travel distance, and trial year were taken into account, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and male patients were less likely to enroll on phase 1 trials versus phase 2/3 trials. These findings suggest a need for targeted interventions to improve access to and education about phase 1 trials for Black and Hispanic/Latino patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subha Perni
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beverly Moy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan D Nipp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simon MS, Raychaudhuri S, Hamel LM, Penner LA, Schwartz KL, Harper FWK, Thompson HS, Booza JC, Cote M, Schwartz AG, Eggly S. A Review of Research on Disparities in the Care of Black and White Patients With Cancer in Detroit. Front Oncol 2021; 11:690390. [PMID: 34336677 PMCID: PMC8320812 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Racial disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes are well-documented in the US, with Black people having higher incidence rates and worse outcomes than White people. In this review, we present a summary of almost 30 years of research conducted by investigators at the Karmanos Cancer Institute's (KCI's) Population Studies and Disparities Research (PSDR) Program focusing on Black-White disparities in cancer incidence, care, and outcomes. The studies in the review focus on individuals diagnosed with cancer from the Detroit Metropolitan area, but also includes individuals included in national databases. Using an organizational framework of three generations of studies on racial disparities, this review describes racial disparities by primary cancer site, disparities associated with the presence or absence of comorbid medical conditions, disparities in treatment, and disparities in physician-patient communication, all of which contribute to poorer outcomes for Black cancer patients. While socio-demographic and clinical differences account for some of the noted disparities, further work is needed to unravel the influence of systemic effects of racism against Black people, which is argued to be the major contributor to disparate outcomes between Black and White patients with cancer. This review highlights evidence-based strategies that have the potential to help mitigate disparities, improve care for vulnerable populations, and build an equitable healthcare system. Lessons learned can also inform a more equitable response to other health conditions and crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S. Simon
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Sreejata Raychaudhuri
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Ascension Providence Hospital/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine (MSUCHM), Southfield, MI, United States
| | - Lauren M. Hamel
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Louis A. Penner
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Kendra L. Schwartz
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Felicity W. K. Harper
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Hayley S. Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Jason C. Booza
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Academic and Student Programs, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Michele Cote
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Ann G. Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Susan Eggly
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Perni S, Hong K, Hong TS, Nipp RD. Toward a Science of Personalized Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:655-661. [PMID: 33974444 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Subha Perni
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Kessely Hong
- Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ryan D Nipp
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Senft N, Manning MA, Eggly S. Redefining Attribution From Patient to Health System-How the Notion of "Mistrust" Places Blame on Black Patients-Reply. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:780-781. [PMID: 33662108 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.8494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Senft
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Mark A Manning
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Susan Eggly
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Borno HT, Andemeskel G, Palmer NR. Redefining Attribution From Patient to Health System-How the Notion of "Mistrust" Places Blame on Black Patients. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:780. [PMID: 33662096 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.8482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hala T Borno
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Ghilamichael Andemeskel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Nynikka R Palmer
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Osarogiagbon RU, Sineshaw HM, Unger JM, Acuña-Villaorduña A, Goel S. Immune-Based Cancer Treatment: Addressing Disparities in Access and Outcomes. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-13. [PMID: 33830825 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_323523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Avoidable differences in the care and outcomes of patients with cancer (i.e., cancer care disparities) emerge or worsen with discoveries of new, more effective approaches to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The rapidly expanding use of immunotherapy for many different cancers across the spectrum from late to early stages has, predictably, been followed by emerging evidence of disparities in access to these highly effective but expensive treatments. The danger that these new treatments will further widen preexisting cancer care and outcome disparities requires urgent corrective intervention. Using a multilevel etiologic framework that categorizes the targets of intervention at the individual, provider, health care system, and social policy levels, we discuss options for a comprehensive approach to prevent and, where necessary, eliminate disparities in access to the clinical trials that are defining the optimal use of immunotherapy for cancer, as well as its safe use in routine care among appropriately diverse populations. We make the case that, contrary to the traditional focus on the individual level in descriptive reports of health care disparities, there is sequentially greater leverage at the provider, health care system, and social policy levels to overcome the challenge of cancer care and outcomes disparities, including access to immunotherapy. We also cite examples of effective government-sponsored and policy-level interventions, such as the National Cancer Institute Minority-Underserved Community Oncology Research Program and the Affordable Care Act, that have expanded clinical trial access and access to high-quality cancer care in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joseph M Unger
- Health Services Research, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Affiliate, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Sanjay Goel
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|