Treatment Selection in First-line Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma-The Contemporary Treatment Paradigm in the Age of Combination Therapy: A Review

EGCG inhibits migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of renal cell carcinoma by activating TFEB-mediated autophagy

BACKGROUND

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is already in the top ten of all types of cancers, with more than 4 %. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a polyphenolic compound extracted from green tea, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of various tumors. However, limited studies have demonstrated the effect of EGCG on RCC and its underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

After exposure to gradient concentration (0,5,10,20,40,60,80,100 μM) of EGCG, the cell viability of RCC cells was determined by MTT assay. The migration and invasion abilities of RCC cells were investigated by wound healing and transwell assays. The expression levels of proteins involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and autophagy were explored by Western blotting assays. The formation of autophagosome was detected by electron microscope and LC3 puncta assays. Nude mouse xenograft model was used as the model system in vivo.

RESULTS

In the present study, EGCG significantly inhibited the migration, invasion and EMT of RCC cells in a concentrated manner. Further exploration of its mechanism indicated that autophagy is involved in EGCG-mediated metastasis inhibition and EMT inhibition of RCC cells. In addition, EGCG could significantly up-regulate the transcription factor EB (TFEB) and promotes its nuclear localization. The incorporation of TFEB into the nucleus enhanced the transcriptional levels of molecules associated with autophagy. TFEB knockdown inhibited EGCG-mediated autophagy activation, metastasis and EMT inhibition in RCC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, these findings demonstrate for the first time that EGCG inhibits migration, invasion, and EMT of RCC by activating TFEB-mediated autophagy. Therefore, the combination of EGCG and TFFB activators or EMT inhibitors is expected to be a promising therapeutic strategy for RCC.

Prognostic significance of absolute lymphocyte count in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line combination immunotherapies: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

BACKGROUND

Lymphocytes are closely linked to mechanisms of action of immuno-oncology (IO) agents. We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC), patients receiving first-line IO-based combination therapy were analysed. Baseline patient characteristics, objective response rates (ORRs), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 966 patients included, 195 (20%) had lymphopenia at baseline, and they had a lower ORR (37% versus 45%; P < 0.001), shorter TTNT (10.1 months versus 24.3 months; P < 0.001), and shorter OS (30.4 months versus 48.2 months; P < 0.001). Among 125 patients with lymphopenia at baseline, 52 (42%) experienced ALC recovery at 3 months, and they had longer OS (not reached versus 30.4 months; P = 0.012). On multivariable analysis for OS, lymphopenia was an independent adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.68; P < 0.001). Incorporation of lymphopenia into the IMDC criteria improved OS prediction accuracy (C-index from 0.688 to 0.707).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphopenia was observed in one-fifth of treatment-naive patients with mRCC and may serve as an indicator of unfavourable oncologic outcomes in the contemporary IO era.

Characterization of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Deferred, Upfront, or No Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Combination Immunotherapy: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

BACKGROUND

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has not yet been well characterized in the era of combination immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate characteristics and outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received immuno-oncology (IO)-based combination therapy according to CN status.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC), patients with mRCC who received frontline IO-based combinations were included. Upfront CN was defined as CN up to 3 mo before diagnosis of metastatic disease but before systemic therapy initiation. Deferred CN was defined as CN after systemic therapy initiation.

OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Overall survival (OS) from initiation of systemic therapy was estimated via Cox proportional-hazards regression. A 12-mo landmark time and a time-varying covariate for CN status were used to mitigate potential bias.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 385 patients eligible for landmark analysis, 24, 182, and 179 underwent deferred CN, upfront CN, and no CN, respectively. Patients in the no CN subgroup were older (63 yr vs 57 yr in the deferred CN subgroup and 60 yr in the upfront CN subgroup; p = 0.001) and a higher proportion had bone metastases (44% vs 26% in the deferred CN subgroup and 23% in the upfront CN subgroup; p < 0.001). A lower proportion of patients in the upfront CN subgroup had IMDC poor risk (23% vs 43% in the no CN subgroup and 47% in the deferred CN subgroup; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, CN receipt was an independent favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.78; p = 0.005). The study is limited by the lack of randomization and its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite changes in practice patterns with the advent of novel therapeutic agents, CN may still serve as an effective surgical intervention in carefully selected patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with metastatic kidney cancer, surgery to remove the primary tumor was traditionally the treatment of choice, but immunotherapy drugs are now another option for these patients. We analyzed data for contemporary patients with metastatic kidney cancer who received combination immunotherapy as their first treatment. We found that in selected patients receiving immunotherapy, surgery to remove the primary tumor as well can result in better prognosis.

Diagnostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in renal cell cancer

The clinical presentation of renal cell cancer (RCC) is shifting towards incidental and early detection, creating new challenges in RCC diagnosis. Overtreatment might be reduced with the development of new diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant small renal masses (SRMs). Differently from tissue biopsies, liquid biopsies are obtained from a patient's blood or urine and, therefore, are minimally invasive and suitable for longitudinal monitoring. The most promising types of liquid biopsy biomarkers for RCC diagnosis are circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-free DNA. Circulating tumour cell assays have the highest specificity, with low processing time and costs. However, the biological characteristics and low sensitivity limit the use of these markers in SRM diagnostics. Cell-free DNA might complement the diagnosis of high-volume RCC, but the potential for clinical application in SRMs is limited. EVs have the highest biological abundance and the highest sensitivity in identifying low-volume disease; moreover, the molecular characteristics of these markers make EVs suitable for multiple analytical applications. Thus, currently, EV assays have the greatest potential for diagnostic application in RCC (including identification of SRMs). All these liquid biomarkers have potential in clinical practice, pending validation studies. Biomarker implementation will be needed to also improve characterization of RCC subtypes. Last, diagnostic biomarkers might be extended to prognostic or predictive applications.

Real-world Outcome of Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Intermediate- or Poor-risk International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Criteria Treated by Immune-oncology Combinations: Differential Effectiveness by Risk Group?

BACKGROUND

Renal c carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary cancers worldwide, with a predicted increase in incidence in the coming years. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, in doublets, or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has rapidly become a cornerstone of the RCC therapeutic scenario, but no head-to-head comparisons have been made. In this setting, real-world evidence emerges as a cornerstone to guide clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with first-line immune combinations or immune oncology (IO)-TKIs for advanced RCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data from 930 patients, 654 intermediate risk and 276 poor risk, were collected retrospectively from 58 centers in 20 countries. Special data such as sarcomatoid differentiation, body mass index, prior nephrectomy, and metastatic localization, in addition to biochemical data such as hemoglobin, platelets, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils, and radiological response by investigator's criteria, were collected.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was calculated by the inverse Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median follow-up time was 18.7 mo. In the 654 intermediate-risk patients, the median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the intermediate than in those with the poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria (38.9 vs 17.3 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] p < 0.001, and 17.3 vs 11.6 mo, 95% CI p < 0.001, respectively). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the OS was 55.7 mo (95% CI 31.4-55.7) and 40.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p = 0.047). PFS was 30.7 mo (95% CI 16.5-55.7) and 13.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in intermediate-risk patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p < 0.001). In the poor-risk subgroup, the median OS and PFS did not show a statistically significant difference between IO + IO and IO + TKI. Our study presents several limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed differences between the IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations in intermediate-risk patients. A clear association with longer PFS and OS in favor of patients who received the IO + TKI combinations compared with the IO-IO combination was observed. Instead, in the poor-risk group, we observed no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received different combinations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Renal cancer is one of the most frequent genitourinary tumors. Treatment is currently based on immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there are no comparisons between these.In this study, we have analyzed the clinical course of 930 patients from 58 centers in 20 countries around the world. We aimed to analyze the differences between the two main treatment strategies, combination of two immunotherapies versus immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy, and found in real-life data that intermediate-risk patients (approximately 60% of patients with metastatic renal cancer) seem to benefit more from the combination of immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy than from double immunotherapy. No such differences were found in poor-risk patients. This may have important implications in daily practice decision-making for these patients.

Regulator of G protein signaling-1 regulates immune infiltration and macrophage polarization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To better understand how to clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC) is affected by the regulator of G protein signaling-1 (RGS1), its effect on immune infiltration, macrophage polarization, tumor proliferation migration, and to explore whether RGS1 may serve as a marker and therapeutic target for ccRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, a total of 20 surgical specimens of patients with pathological diagnosis of ccRCC admitted to the Department of Urology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from November 2021 to June 2022 were selected for pathological and protein testing, while the expression of RGS1 in tumors, immune infiltration, and macrophage polarization, particularly M2 macrophage linked to the development of tumor microenvironment (TME), were combined with TGCA database and GO analysis. We also further explored and studied the expression and function of RGS1 in TME, investigated how RGS1 affected tumor growth, migration, apoptosis, and other traits, and initially explored the signaling pathways and mechanisms that RGS1 may affect.

RESULTS

RGS1 was found to be expressed at higher quantities in ccRCC than in normal cells or tissues, according to bioinformatics analysis and preliminary experimental data from this work. Using the TCGA database and GO analysis to describe the expression of RGS1 in a range of tumors, it was found that ccRCC had a much higher level of RGS1 expression than other tumor types. The results of gene enrichment analysis indicated that overexpression of RGS1 may be associated with immune infiltration. The outcomes of in vitro tests revealed that RGS1 overexpression in ccRCC did not significantly alter the proliferation and migration ability of ccRCC, but RGS1 overexpression promoted apoptosis in ccRCC. By in vitro co-culture experiments, RGS1 overexpression inhibited M2 macrophage polarization and also suppressed the Jagged-1/Notch signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

RGS1 is highly expressed in ccRCC, while overexpression of RGS1 may increase immune infiltration in the TME and reduce the polarization of M2 macrophages while promoting apoptosis in ccRCC.

Chromosome 3p gene alterations as biomarkers for immunocombinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A hypothesis-generating analysis

BACKGROUND

Identifying biomarkers for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is an unmet need in actual immunotherapy era. Available data regarding chromosome 3p genes (i.e., VHL, PBRM1, SETD2) mutations as potential predictors for therapy response is conflicting. We describe the impact of these mutations on clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-doublet or ICI/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis on mRCC patients treated with first line ICI/ICI or ICI/TKI. A multi-gene panel was used, allowing the amplification of 841 amplicons (54.93 kb, human reference sequence hg19/GRCh37) in the coding sequences of the following genes: ATM, BAP1, KDM5C, MET, MTOR, NF2, PBRM1, PIK3CA, PTEN, SETD2, SMARCB1, TP53, TSC1, TSC2, VHL.

RESULTS

18 patients undergoing ICI/ICI and ICI/TKI who had tumor tissue adequate for molecular analysis were included. Histology was 100% clear cell. IMDC risk was 50% intermediate, 33.4% good, 16.6% poor. First line therapy was 89% ICI/TKI, 11% ICI/ICI. 83.3% pts (n = 15) carried genomic alterations (GA). Most common GA included VHL in 44% (n = 8; 7 pathogenic - PAT and 1 variant of unknown significance - VUS), PBRM1 in 44% (n = 8; 5 PAT and 3 VUS) and SETD2 in 33% (n = 6; 4 PAT and 2 VUS). With the limit of a small sample that did not allow proper statistical analyses, SETD2-mutated patients had lower median progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) than non-SETD2 mutated patients. Higher mPFS and mOS were shown with VHL or PBRM1 GA, especially in PBRM1 +VHL mutated pts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data shows a possible negative predictive role of SETD2 GA for ICI-based therapy in RCC. Concomitant VHL and PBRM1 GA could act as a predictor for ICI/TKI efficacy. Our hypothesis-generating analysis highlights the need of an integrated evaluation of these genes as promising biomarkers in RCC. Further larger studies are required.

Dysregulated ANLN reveals immune cell landscape and promotes carcinogenesis by regulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Background

Abnormal anillin (ANLN) expression has been observed in multiple tumours and is closely associated with patient prognosis and clinical features. In this study, we systematically elucidated the clinical significance and biological roles of ANLN in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods

We obtained transcriptome and clinical data of patients with ccRCC from public databases. Multi-omics data and clinical samples were combined to analyse the correlation between ANLN expression and the clinical characteristics of patients with renal cancer. Additionally, the immune cell landscape of ANLN expression was evaluated using different immune algorithms in the tumour microenvironment. The tumour-promoting potential of ANLN was confirmed using in vitro assays, including CCK8 and Transwell assays.

Results

Bioinformatics analysis showed that ANLN is over-expressed in patients with ccRCC, as validated by clinical samples. Publicly available clinical data suggest that high ANLN expression may indicate poor outcomes in patients with ccRCC. Moreover, biological function analysis revealed a marked enrichment of the cell cycle and PI3K-Akt pathways. The distribution of immune cells, particularly M2 macrophages, differed in patients with ccRCC. Furthermore, ANLN silencing inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of renal cancer cells in vitro. After ANLN expression was knocked down in 786-O cells, the protein levels of important PI3K signalling pathway components, including PI3K, Akt, and mTOR, drastically decreased.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that ANLN is dysregulated in renal cancer tissues and promotes tumour progression by activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway.

Emerging Immunotherapy Approaches for Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

The most common subtype of renal cell carcinoma is clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). While localized ccRCC can be cured with surgery, metastatic disease has a poor prognosis. Recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for advanced ccRCC. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving immunotherapeutic landscape for metastatic ccRCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy as monotherapies and in combination regimens. Combination immunotherapies pairing ICIs with antiangiogenic agents, other immunomodulators, or novel therapeutic platforms such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are areas of active research. Beyond the checkpoint blockade, additional modalities including therapeutic vaccines, cytokines, and oncolytic viruses are also being explored for ccRCC. This review discusses the mechanisms, major clinical trials, challenges, and future directions for these emerging immunotherapies. While current strategies have shown promise in improving patient outcomes, continued research is critical for expanding and optimizing immunotherapy approaches for advanced ccRCC. Realizing the full potential of immunotherapy will require elucidating mechanisms of response and resistance, developing predictive biomarkers, and rationally designing combination therapeutic regimens tailored to individual patients. Advances in immunotherapy carry immense promise for transforming the management of metastatic ccRCC.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: A Scoping Review on Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are complex chemical structures composed of a monoclonal antibody, serving as a link to target cells, which is conjugated with a potent cytotoxic drug (i.e., payload) through a chemical linker. Inspired by Paul Ehrlich's concept of the ideal anticancer drug as a "magic bullet", ADCs are also highly specific anticancer agents, as they have been demonstrated to recognize, bind, and neutralize cancer cells, limiting injuries to normal cells. ADCs are among the newest pharmacologic breakthroughs in treating solid and hematologic malignancies. Indeed, in recent years, various ADCs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for the treatment of several cancers, resulting in a "practice-changing" approach. However, despite these successes, no ADC is approved for treating patients affected by renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the present paper, we thoroughly reviewed the current literature and summarized preclinical studies and clinical trials that evaluated the activity and toxicity profile of ADCs in RCC patients. Moreover, we scrutinized the potential causes that, until now, hampered the therapeutical success of ADCs in those patients. Finally, we discussed novel strategies that would improve the development of ADCs and their efficacy in treating RCC patients.

Prognostic and tumor microenvironmental feature of clear cell renal cell carcinoma revealed by m6A and lactylation modification-related genes

Background

Both lactylation and m6A modification have important implications for the development of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and we aimed to use crosstalk genes of both to reveal the prognostic and immunological features of ccRCC.

Methods

Our first step was to look for lactylation-related genes that differed between normal and tumor tissues, and then by correlation analysis, we found the genes associated with M6A. Following that, ccRCC subtypes will be identified and risk models will be constructed to compare the prognosis and tumor microenvironment among different subgroups. A nomogram was constructed to predict the prognosis of ccRCC, and in vitro, experiments were conducted to validate the expression and function of key genes.

Results

We screened 100 crosstalk genes and identified 2 ccRCC subtypes. A total of 11 prognostic genes were screened for building a risk model. we observed higher immune scores, elevated tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability scores in the high-risk group. Therefore, individuals classified as high-risk would derive greater benefits from immunotherapy. The nomogram's ability to predict overall survival with a 1-year AUC of 0.863 demonstrates its significant practical utility. In addition, HIBCH was identified as a potential therapeutic target and its expression and function were verified by in vitro experiments.

Conclusion

In addition to developing a precise prognostic nomogram for patients with ccRCC, our study also discovered the potential of HIBCH as a biomarker for the disease.

Bibliometric analysis on the progress of immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma from 2003-2022

The incidence and mortality rates of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been increasing annually due to obesity and environmental pollution. Although immunotherapy of RCC has been studied for decades, few comprehensive bibliometric analyses exist on the treatment. Therefore, the purpose of this bibliometric analysis was to identify scientific achievements of the global research on RCC immunotherapy from 2003 to 2022 and discuss research trends. Data were retrieved from the Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection using a set retrieval strategy. The Bibliometrics tool Cite Space 6.2 R2 (Chaomei Chen, Drexel University) was used to analyze 4,841 articles. The USA had the most publications (n = 1,864); Harvard University was identified as the leading institution (n = 264); and Dr. Toni K. Choueiri, was the most productive researcher in the field (n = 55). Keyword analysis showed that nivolumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor microenvironment, everolimus, cabozantinib, resistance, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab were the main hotspots and frontier directions of RCC. By analyzing the results of bibliometrics, national and international researchers can better understand the current research status of RCC immunotherapy and identify new directions for future research. However, the analysis also identified pockets of insularity, highlighting a need for greater collaboration and cooperation among researchers to advance the field of RCC immunotherapy.

HIF2α, Hepcidin and their crosstalk as tumour-promoting signalling

Not all aspects of the disruption of iron homeostasis in cancer have been fully elucidated. Iron accumulation in cancer cells is frequent for many solid tumours, and this is often accompanied by the contemporary rise of two key iron regulators, HIF2α and Hepcidin. This scenario is different from what happens under physiological conditions, where Hepcidin parallels systemic iron concentrations while HIF2α levels are inversely associated to Hepcidin. The present review highlights the increasing body of evidence for the pro-tumoral effect of HIF2α and Hepcidin, discusses the possible imbalance in HIF2α, Hepcidin and iron homeostasis during cancer, and explores therapeutic options relying on these pathways as anticancer strategies.

Mechanisms and clinical implications in renal carcinoma resistance: narrative review of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma. The prognosis for patients with ccRCC has improved over recent years with the use of combination therapies with an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) backbone. This has enhanced the quality of life and life expectancy of patients with this disease. Unfortunately, not all patients benefit; eventually, most patients will develop resistance to therapy and progress. Recent molecular, biochemical, and immunological research has extensively researched anti-angiogenic and immune-based treatment resistance mechanisms. This analysis offers an overview of the principles underpinning the resistance pathways related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Additionally, novel approaches to overcome resistance that may be considered for the trial context are discussed.

The components of tumor microenvironment as biomarker for immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Substantial improvement in prognosis among metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients has been achieved, owing to the rapid development and utilization of immunotherapy. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been considered the backbone of systemic therapy for patients with mRCC alongside multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the latest clinical practice guidelines. However, controversies and challenges in optimal individualized treatment regarding immunotherapy remains still About 2/3 of the patients presented non-response or acquired resistance to ICIs. Besides, immune-related toxicities, namely immune-related adverse events, are still elusive and life-threatening. Thus, reliable biomarkers to predict immunotherapeutic outcomes for mRCC patients are needed urgently. Tumor microenvironment (TME), consisting of immune cells, vasculature, signaling molecules, and extracellular matrix and regulates tumor immune surveillance and immunological evasion through complex interplay, plays a critical role in tumor immune escape and consequently manipulates the efficacy of immunotherapy. Various studied have identified the different TME components are significantly associated with the outcome of mRCC patients receiving immunotherapy, making them potential valuable biomarkers in therapeutic guidance. The present review aims to summarize the latest evidence on the associations between the components of TME including immune cells, cytokines and extracellular matrix, and the therapeutic responses among mRCC patients with ICI-based treatment. We further discuss the feasibility and limitation of these components as biomarkers.

Clinical Characteristics of Molecularly Defined Renal Cell Carcinomas

Kidney tumors comprise a broad spectrum of different histopathological entities, with more than 0.4 million newly diagnosed cases each year, mostly in middle-aged and older men. Based on the description of the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), some new categories of tumor types have been added according to their specific molecular typing. However, studies on these types of RCC are still superficial, many types of these RCC currently lack accurate diagnostic standards in the clinic, and treatment protocols are largely consistent with the treatment guidelines for clear cell RCC (ccRCC), which might result in worse treatment outcomes for patients with these types of molecularly defined RCC. In this article, we conduct a narrative review of the literature published in the last 15 years on molecularly defined RCC. The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical features and the current status of research on the detection and treatment of molecularly defined RCC.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Is Safe and Facilitates Treatment-free Intervals

Patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) who respond to upfront immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies may be treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) to remove radiographically viable primary tumors. Early data for post-ICI CN suggested that ICI therapies induce desmoplastic reactions in some patients, increasing the risk of surgical complications and perioperative mortality. We evaluated perioperative outcomes for 75 consecutive patients treated with post-ICI CN at four institutions from 2017 to 2022. Our cohort of 75 patients had minimal or no residual metastatic disease but radiographically enhancing primary tumors after ICI and were treated with CN. Intraoperative complications were identified in 3/75 patients (4%) and 90-d postoperative complications in 19/75 (25%), including two patients (3%) with high-grade (Clavien ≥III) complications. One patient was readmitted within 30 d. No patients died within 90 d after surgery. Viable tumor was present in all but one specimen. Approximately half of the patients (36/75, 48%) remained off systemic therapy at last follow-up. These data suggest that CN following ICI therapy is safe and associated with low rates of major postoperative complications in appropriately selected patients at experienced centers. Post-ICI CN may facilitate observation without additional systemic therapy in patients without significant residual metastatic disease.

Patient summary

Current first-line treatment for patients with kidney cancer that has spread to other sites (metastatic cancer) is immunotherapy. For cases in which metastatic sites respond to this therapy but primary tumor is still detected in the kidney, surgical treatment of the tumor is feasible and has a low rate of complications, and may delay the need for further chemotherapy.

Establishing a prognostic model of chromatin modulators and identifying potential drug candidates in renal clear cell patients

BACKGROUND

Renal carcinoma is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system. Advanced renal carcinoma has a low 5-year survival rate and a poor prognosis. More and more studies have confirmed that chromatin regulators (CRs) can regulate the occurrence and development of cancer. This article investigates the functional and prognostic value of CRs in renal carcinoma patients.

METHODS

mRNA expression and clinical information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis were used to select prognostic chromatin-regulated genes and use them to construct a risk model for predicting the prognosis of renal cancer. Differences in prognosis between high-risk and low-risk groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between chromatin regulators and tumor immune infiltration, and explored differences in drug sensitivity between risk groups.

RESULTS

We constructed a model consisting of 11 CRs to predict the prognosis of renal cancer patients. We not only successfully validated its feasibility, but also found that the 11 CR-based model was an independent prognostic factor. Functional analysis showed that CRs were mainly enriched in cancer development-related signalling pathways. We also found through the TIMER database that CR-based models were also associated with immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoints. At the same time, the genomics of drug sensitivity in cancer database was used to analyze the commonly used drugs of renal clear cell carcinoma patients. It was found that patients in the low-risk group were sensitive to medicines such as axitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and gemcitabine. In contrast, those in the high-risk group may be sensitive to sunitinib.

CONCLUSION

The chromatin regulator-related prognostic model we constructed can be used to assess the prognostic risk of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The results of this study can bring new ideas for targeted therapy of clear cell renal carcinoma, helping doctors to take corresponding measures in advance for patients with different risks.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma

The therapeutic algorithm of renal cell carcinoma has been revolutionized by the approval of immunotherapy agents by regulatory agencies. However, objective and durable responses are still not observed in a large number of patients, and prognostic and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response are urgently needed. Prognostic models used in clinical practice are based on clinical and laboratory factors (such as hypercalcaemia, neutrophil count or Karnofsky Performance Status), but, with progress in molecular biology and genome sequencing techniques, new renal cell carcinoma molecular features that might improve disease course and outcomes prediction have been highlighted. An implementation of current models is needed to improve the accuracy of prognosis in the immuno-oncology era. Moreover, several potential biomarkers are currently under evaluation, but effective markers to select patients who might benefit from immunotherapy and to guide therapeutic strategies are still far from validation.

Bone Metabolism Effects of Medical Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

The medical therapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is based on the use of targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). These therapies are characterized by multiple endocrine adverse events, but the effect on the bone is still less known. Relatively few case reports or small case series have been specifically focused on TKI and ICI effects on bone metabolism. However, the importance to consider these possible side effects is easily intuitable because the bone is one of the most frequent metastatic sites of RCC. Among TKI used in RCC, sunitinib and sorafenib can cause hypophosphatemia with increased PTH levels and low-normal serum calcium levels. Considering ICI, nivolumab and ipilimumab, which can be used in association in a combination strategy, are associated with an increased risk of hypocalcemia, mediated by an autoimmune mechanism targeted on the calcium-sensing receptor. A fearsome complication, reported for TKI and rarely for ICI, is osteonecrosis of the jaw. Awareness of these possible side effects makes a clinical evaluation of RCC patients on anticancer therapy mandatory, especially if associated with antiresorptive therapy such as bisphosphonates and denosumab, which can further increase the risk of these complications.

Non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H participates in anti-programmed cell death-1 resistance of clear cell renal cell carcinomas

Non-SMC condensin I complex subunit H (NCAPH) is reported to play an important role and be a poor prognostic factor in various cancers. However, the function and regulatory mechanism of NCAPH in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain unknown. The roles of NCAPH on ccRCC growth were detected in vitro and in vivo assays. The regulatory mechanism of NCAPH was explored by immunoprecipitation assay, ubiquitination assay, ChIP assay, RIP assay, luciferase reporter assay and RNA pull-down assay. The role of NCAPH in immunoregulation also was explored by flow cytometry, T cell-mediated tumour cell killing assay and immune-competent mouse model. In this research, we displayed that NCAPH was upregulated in ccRCC and patients with elevated NCAPH expression had an undesirable prognosis. Functionally, NCAPH depletion restrained ccRCC growth in vitro and in vivo. The elevated NCAPH was attributed to FOXP3-mediated transcription, FUS-mediated transcription splicing and METTL3-mediated m6A modification. Moreover, YTHDC1 promoted NCAPH mRNA nuclear export, and IGF2BP3 enhanced NCAPH mRNA stability in an m6A-dependent manner. NCAPH increased PD-L1 expression by inhibiting the degradation of β-catenin in ccRCC cells, which further facilitated aerobic glycolysis and immune tolerance of ccRCC. Collectively, our findings display the vital function of NCAPH in ccRCC and uncover that NCAPH may be regarded as a potential therapeutic target to reverse the immune tolerance of ccRCC.

Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming-mediated immunogenic cell death reveals immune and prognostic features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Background

Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming (MMR)-mediated immunogenic cell death (ICD) is closely related to the tumor microenvironment (TME). Our purpose was to reveal the TME characteristics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by using them.

Methods

Target genes were obtained by intersecting ccRCC differentially expressed genes (DEGs, tumor VS normal) with MMR and ICD-related genes. For the risk model, univariate COX regression and K-M survival analysis were used to identify genes most associated with overall survival (OS). Differences in the TME, function, tumor mutational load (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) between high and low-risk groups were subsequently compared. Using risk scores and clinical variables, a nomogram was constructed. Predictive performance was evaluated by calibration plots and receiver operating characteristics (ROC).

Results

We screened 140 DEGs, including 12 prognostic genes for the construction of risk models. We found that the immune score, immune cell infiltration abundance, and TMB and MSI scores were higher in the high-risk group. Thus, high-risk populations would benefit more from immunotherapy. We also identified the three genes (CENPA, TIMP1, and MYCN) as potential therapeutic targets, of which MYCN is a novel biomarker. Additionally, the nomogram performed well in both TCGA (1-year AUC=0.862) and E-MTAB-1980 cohorts (1-year AUC=0.909).

Conclusions

Our model and nomogram allow accurate prediction of patients' prognoses and immunotherapy responses.

Establishment and validation of a polygene prognostic model for clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Purpose: To establish an effective prognostic model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: We identified four hub differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and verified them in the Cancer Gene Atlas (TCGA), STRING, UALCAN, TIMER, and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) databases. We then used TCGA and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) to identify tumor pathway molecules highly correlated with hub DEGs. And by further LASSO and Cox regression analysis, we successfully identified five genes as prognostic factors. Results: We successfully identified a risk prediction model consisting of five genes: IGF2BP3, CDKN1A, GSDMB, FABP5, RBMX. We next distributed patients into low-risk and high-risk groups using the median as a cutoff. The low-risk group obviously had better survival than those in the predicted high-risk group. The results showed discrepancies in tumor-associated immune cell infiltration between risk groups. We also combined the risk model with clinical variables to create a nomogram. Conclusion: Our model has a satisfactory predictive effect on the prognosis of ccRCC patients and may provide new ideas for future immune therapy.

Comprehensive analysis of 7-methylguanosine and immune microenvironment characteristics in clear cell renal cell carcinomas

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common tumors in the urinary system. ccRCC has obvious immunological characteristics, and the infiltration of immune cells is related to the prognosis of ccRCC. The effect of immune checkpoint therapy is related to the dynamic changes of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIM). The 7-methylguanosine (m7G) is an additional mRNA modification ability besides m6A, which is closely related to the TIM and affects the occurrence and development of tumors. At present, the correlations between m7G and the immune microenvironment, treatment, and prognosis of ccRCC are not clear. As far as we know, there was no study on the relationship between m7G and the immune microenvironment and survival of clear cell renal cell carcinomas. A comprehensive analysis of the correlations between them and the construction of a prognosis model are helpful to improve the treatment strategy. Two different molecular subtypes were identified in 539 ccRCC samples by describing the differences of 29 m7G-related genes. It was found that the clinical features, TIM, and prognosis of ccRCC patients were correlated with the m7G-related genes. We found that there were significant differences in the expression of PD-1, CTLA4, and PD-L1 between high- and low-risk groups. To sum up, m7G-related genes play a potential role in the TIM, treatment, and prognosis of ccRCC. Our results provide new findings for ccRCC and help to improve the immunotherapy strategies and prognosis of patients.

Imaging Response to Contemporary Immuno-oncology Combination Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

IMPORTANCE

The association between treatment with first-line immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies and physician-assessed objective imaging response among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains uncharacterized.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the likelihood of objective imaging response (ie, complete or partial response) to first-line IO combination ipilimumab-nivolumab (IOIO) therapy vs approved IO with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (IOVE) combination therapies among patients with mRCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter international cohort study was nested in routine clinical practice. A data set from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) was used to identify consecutive patients with mRCC who received treatment with IO combination therapies between May 30, 2013, and September 9, 2021. A total of 899 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC who received treatment with a first-line IOVE or IOIO regimen and had evaluable responses were included.

EXPOSURES

Best overall response to first-line IO combination therapy based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the difference in treating physician-assessed objective imaging response based on the type of first-line IO combination therapy received. Secondary outcomes included the identification of baseline characteristics positively associated with objective imaging response and the association of objective imaging response with overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 1085 patients with mRCC who received first-line IO combination therapies, 899 patients (median age, 62.8 years [IQR, 55.9-69.2 years]; 666 male [74.2%]) had evaluable responses. A total of 794 patients had information available on IMDC risk classification; of those, 127 patients (16.0%) had favorable risk, 442 (55.7%) had intermediate risk, and 225 (28.3%) had poor risk. With regard to best overall response among all participants, 37 patients (4.1%) had complete response, 344 (38.3%) had partial response, 315 (35.0%) had stable disease, and 203 (22.6%) had progressive disease. Corresponding median overall survival was not estimable (95% CI, 53.3 months to not estimable) among patients with complete response, 55.9 months (95% CI, 44.1 months to not estimable) among patients with partial response, 48.1 months (95% CI, 33.4 months to not estimable) among patients with stable disease, and 13.0 months (95% CI, 8.4-18.1 months) among patients with progressive disease (log rank P < .001). Treatment with IOVE therapy was found to be independently associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining response (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.26-2.81; P = .002) compared with IOIO therapy. The presence of lung metastases (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.20), receipt of cytoreductive nephrectomy (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.04-2.43), and favorable IMDC risk (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.10-3.39) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of response.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, treatment with IOVE therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of objective imaging response compared with IOIO therapy. The presence of lung metastases, receipt of cytoreductive nephrectomy, and favorable IMDC risk were associated with increased odds of experiencing objective imaging response. These findings may help inform treatment selection, especially in clinical contexts associated with high-volume multisite metastatic disease, in which obtaining objective imaging response is important.

Compassionate Use Program of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Intermediate or Poor Risk Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Large Multicenter Italian Study

This is a retrospective analysis on the safety and activity of compassionate Ipilimumab and Nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) administered to patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) with intermediate or poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score as a first-line regimen. IPI was infused at 1 mg/kg in combination with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every three weeks for four doses, followed by maintenance Nivolumab (240 or 480 mg flat dose every two or four weeks, respectively) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 324 patients started IPI-NIVO at 86 Italian centers. Median age was 62 years, 68.2% IMDC intermediate risk. Primary tumor had been removed in 65.1% of patients. Two hundred and twenty patients (67.9%) completed the four IPI-NIVO doses. Investigator-assessed overall response rate was 37.6% (2.8% complete). Twelve-month survival rate was 66.8%, median progression-free survival was 8.3 months. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67 patients (26.9%). IMDC intermediate risk, nephrectomy, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, and steroid use for toxicities correlated with improved survival, while age < 70 years did not. IPI-NIVO combination is a feasible and effective regimen for the first-line treatment of intermediate-poor IMDC risk mRCC patients in routine clinical practice.

The roaring 2020s: a new decade of systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The genomic and immunologic profiling of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has provided the impetus for advancements in systemic treatments using combination therapy - either with immune check point inhibitor (ICI) + ICI or with ICI + targeted therapy. This approach has been examined in several landmark trials, treating both clear cell (ccRCC) and nonclear cell (nccRCC) histologies. In this review, we highlight systemic therapy advancements made in this new decade, the 2020s.

RECENT FINDINGS

Targeting the programmed death receptor 1/PD-L1 pathway has created more tolerable and effective immunotherapy regimens, expanding the applications of ICIs. These new applications, paired with trial data, include ICI monotherapy in nccRCC and adjuvant pembrolizumab in resected, high-risk RCC. In addition, ICI + ICI and ICI + TKI combination therapy have demonstrated oncologic efficacy in advanced ccRCC and sarcomatoid RCC. Similar progress has been noted regarding new targeted therapies. Along the hypoxia inducible factor pathway, belzutifan has received FDA approval in von Hippel-Lindau-associated RCC. In addition, in papillary RCC, agents such as cabozantinib target the MET proto-oncogene pathway and have demonstrated impressive oncologic outcomes.

SUMMARY

The 2020s utilize the molecular profiling of advanced RCC as a scaffold for recent trials in immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Going forward, emphasizing patient-reported outcomes and careful clinical trial construction remain critical to improve systemic therapy in RCC.