Association of Sinoatrial Node Radiation Dose With Atrial Fibrillation and Mortality in Patients With Lung Cancer

Cardiac Substructure Dose and Survival in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: Results of the Multi-Centre SSBROC Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly used for early-stage lung cancer, however the impact of dose to the heart and cardiac substructures remains largely unknown. The study investigated doses received by cardiac substructures in SABR patients and impact on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SSBROC is an Australian multi-centre phase II prospective study of SABR for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were treated between 2013 and 2019 across 9 centres. In this secondary analysis of the dataset, a previously published and locally developed open-source hybrid deep learning cardiac substructure automatic segmentation tool was deployed on the planning CTs of 117 trial patients. Physical doses to 18 cardiac structures and EQD2 converted doses (α/β = 3) were calculated. Endpoints evaluated include pericardial effusion and overall survival. Associations between cardiac doses and survival were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Cardiac structures that received the highest physical mean doses were superior vena cava (22.5 Gy) and sinoatrial node (18.3 Gy). The highest physical maximum dose was received by the heart (51.7 Gy) and right atrium (45.3 Gy). Three patients developed grade 2, and one grade 3 pericardial effusion. The cohort receiving higher than median mean heart dose (MHD) had poorer survival compared to those who received below median MHD (p = 0.00004). On multivariable Cox analysis, male gender and maximum dose to ascending aorta were significant for worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with lung SABR may receive high doses to cardiac substructures. Dichotomising the patients according to median mean heart dose showed a clear difference in survival. On multivariable analyses gender and dose to ascending aorta were significant for survival, however cardiac substructure dosimetry and outcomes should be further explored in larger studies.

Identification of atrial fibrillation-related genes through transcriptome data analysis and Mendelian randomization

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common persistent arrhythmia characterized by rapid and chaotic atrial electrical activity, potentially leading to severe complications such as thromboembolism, heart failure, and stroke, significantly affecting patient quality of life and safety. As the global population ages, the prevalence of AF is on the rise, placing considerable strains on individuals and healthcare systems. This study utilizes bioinformatics and Mendelian Randomization (MR) to analyze transcriptome data and genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, aiming to identify biomarkers causally associated with AF and explore their potential pathogenic pathways.

Methods

We obtained AF microarray datasets GSE41177 and GSE79768 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, merged them, and corrected for batch effects to pinpoint differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We gathered exposure data from expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and outcome data from AF GWAS through the IEU Open GWAS database. We employed inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted model approaches for MR analysis to assess exposure-outcome causality. IVW was the primary method, supplemented by other techniques. The robustness of our results was evaluated using Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. A "Veen" diagram visualized the overlap of DEGs with significant eQTL genes from MR analysis, referred to as common genes (CGs). Additional analyses, including Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, and immune cell infiltration studies, were conducted on these intersecting genes to reveal their roles in AF pathogenesis.

Results

The combined dataset revealed 355 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with 228 showing significant upregulation and 127 downregulated. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis identified that the autocrine motility factor receptor (AMFR) [IVW: OR = 0.977; 95% CI, 0.956-0.998; P = 0.030], leucine aminopeptidase 3 (LAP3) [IVW: OR = 0.967; 95% CI, 0.934-0.997; P = 0.048], Rab acceptor 1 (RABAC1) [IVW: OR = 0.928; 95% CI, 0.875-0.985; P = 0.015], and tryptase beta 2 (TPSB2) [IVW: OR = 0.971; 95% CI, 0.943-0.999; P = 0.049] are associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Conversely, GTPase-activating SH3 domain-binding protein 2 (G3BP2) [IVW: OR = 1.030; 95% CI, 1.004-1.056; P = 0.024], integrin subunit beta 2 (ITGB2) [IVW: OR = 1.050; 95% CI, 1.017-1.084; P = 0.003], glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase (QPCT) [IVW: OR = 1.080; 95% CI, 1.010-0.997; P = 1.154], and tripartite motif containing 22 (TRIM22) [IVW: OR = 1.048; 95% CI, 1.003-1.095; P = 0.035] are positively associated with AF risk. Sensitivity analyses indicated a lack of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy (P > 0.05), and leave-one-out analysis did not reveal any single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) impacting the MR results significantly. GO and KEGG analyses showed that CG is involved in processes such as protein polyubiquitination, neutrophil degranulation, specific and tertiary granule formation, protein-macromolecule adaptor activity, molecular adaptor activity, and the SREBP signaling pathway, all significantly enriched. The analysis of immune cell infiltration demonstrated associations of CG with various immune cells, including plasma cells, CD8T cells, resting memory CD4T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), gamma delta T cells, activated NK cells, activated mast cells, and neutrophils.

Conclusion

By integrating bioinformatics and MR approaches, genes such as AMFR, G3BP2, ITGB2, LAP3, QPCT, RABAC1, TPSB2, and TRIM22 are identified as causally linked to AF, enhancing our understanding of its molecular foundations. This strategy may facilitate the development of more precise biomarkers and therapeutic targets for AF diagnosis and treatment.

Consequences of ionizing radiation exposure to the cardiovascular system

Ionizing radiation is widely used in various industrial and medical applications, resulting in increased exposure for certain populations. Lessons from radiation accidents and occupational exposure have highlighted the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks associated with radiation exposure. In addition, radiation therapy for cancer has been linked to numerous cardiovascular complications, depending on the distribution of the dose by volume in the heart and other relevant target tissues in the circulatory system. The manifestation of symptoms is influenced by numerous factors, and distinct cardiac complications have previously been observed in different groups of patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy. However, in contemporary radiation therapy, advances in treatment planning with conformal radiation delivery have markedly reduced the mean heart dose and volume of exposure, and these variables are therefore no longer sole surrogates for predicting the risk of specific types of heart disease. Nevertheless, certain cardiac substructures remain vulnerable to radiation exposure, necessitating close monitoring. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the consequences of radiation exposure on the cardiovascular system, drawing insights from various cohorts exposed to uniform, whole-body radiation or to partial-body irradiation, and identify potential risk modifiers in the development of radiation-associated cardiovascular disease.

A roadmap for modelling radiation-induced cardiac disease

Cardiac risk mitigation is a major priority in improving outcomes for cancer survivors as advances in cancer screening and treatments continue to decrease cancer mortality. More than half of adult cancer patients will be treated with radiotherapy (RT); therefore it is crucial to develop a framework for how to assess and predict radiation-induced cardiac disease (RICD). Historically, RICD was modelled solely using whole heart metrics such as mean heart dose. However, data over the past decade has identified cardiac substructures which outperform whole heart metrics in predicting for significant cardiac events. Additionally, non-RT factors such as pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors and toxicity from other therapies contribute to risk of future cardiac events. In this review, we aim to discuss the current evidence and knowledge gaps in predicting RICD and provide a roadmap for the development of comprehensive models based on three interrelated components, (1) baseline CV risk assessment, (2) cardiac substructure radiation dosimetry linked with cardiac-specific outcomes and (3) novel biomarker development.

Dosimetric Impact of Delineation and Motion Uncertainties on the Heart and Substructures in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

AIMS

Delineation variations and organ motion produce difficult-to-quantify uncertainties in planned radiation doses to targets and organs at risk. Similar to manual contouring, most automatic segmentation tools generate single delineations per structure; however, this does not indicate the range of clinically acceptable delineations. This study develops a method to generate a range of automatic cardiac structure segmentations, incorporating motion and delineation uncertainty, and evaluates the dosimetric impact in lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen cardiac structures were delineated using a locally developed auto-segmentation tool. It was applied to lung cancer planning CTs for 27 curative (planned dose ≥50 Gy) cases, and delineation variations were estimated by using ten mapping-atlases to provide separate substructure segmentations. Motion-related cardiac segmentation variations were estimated by auto-contouring structures on ten respiratory phases for 9/27 cases that had 4D-planning CTs. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) incorporating these variations were generated for comparison.

RESULTS

Variations in mean doses (Dmean), defined as the range in values across ten feasible auto-segmentations, were calculated for each cardiac substructure. Over the study cohort the median variations for delineation uncertainty and motion were 2.20-11.09 Gy and 0.72-4.06 Gy, respectively. As relative values, variations in Dmean were between 18.7%-65.3% and 7.8%-32.5% for delineation uncertainty and motion, respectively. Doses vary depending on the individual planned dose distribution, not simply on segmentation differences, with larger dose variations to cardiac structures lying within areas of steep dose gradient.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy dose uncertainties from delineation variations and respiratory-related heart motion were quantified using a cardiac substructure automatic segmentation tool. This predicts the 'dose range' where doses to structures are most likely to fall, rather than single DVH curves. This enables consideration of these uncertainties in cardiotoxicity research and for future plan optimisation. The tool was designed for cardiac structures, but similar methods are potentially applicable to other OARs.

Risk of clinically significant cardiovascular disease associated with postoperative radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: A Korean nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are no large-scale datasets that analyze the relationship between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidences of CVDs with PORT using a national population-based database.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were included from 2007 to 2017. Patients with a prior diagnosis of heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AFib), or heart surgery were excluded. A total of 11,141 patients were included in the final analysis. PORT was used in 1334 patients. Most patients received lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

Major adverse cardiac events mostly occurred within 3-4 years from the diagnosis. After the median follow-up duration of 70.6 months, HF was the most diagnosed disease (5.3 %), followed by AFib (4.5 %), stroke (4.1 %), and pulmonary embolism (3.5 %). All the incidences of clinically significant CVDs did not differ by PORT. This result remained unchanged after the propensity score matching comparison. Age ≥ 65, underlying hypertension, and history of ischemic heart disease were the most related factors to the occurrence of HF and AFib. No significant difference in CVD-free survivals according to PORT status was observed. When stratified by proposed scoring, there were no subgroups showed increased incidence by PORT.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that PORT had no significant impact on various CVD occurrences in NSCLC patients without underlying heart disease.

How to contour the different heart subregions for future deep-learning modeling of the heart: A practical pictorial proposal for radiation oncologists

There are currently no accurate rules for manually delineating the subregions of the heart (cavities, vessels, aortic/mitral valves, Planning organ at Risk Volumes for coronary arteries) with the perspective of deep-learning based modeling. Our objective was to present a practical pictorial view for radiation oncologists, based on the RTOG atlas and anatomical complementary considerations for the cases where the RTOG guidelines are missing.

Cardiac substructures dosimetric predicts cardiac toxicity and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell cancer treated by radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To look into the relationship between cardiac substructures (CS) dosimetric parameters and cardiac events (CE) or overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study included 350 patients with ESCC receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy (d-CRT/d-RT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) from March 2013 to May 2022. Our study examined the adverse cardiac events of any grade or G3+, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Competing risk analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between CS doses and CEs or OS.

RESULTS

201 (57.4 %) patients received any grade CEs over a median follow-up time of 22.50 months (IQR, 12.40-45.60), and 24 (6.86 %) patients suffered G3+ CEs. On landmark analysis, patients with any grade CEs had significantly lower OS (P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis revealed that any grade CEs were predicted by the dose of CSs in all populations. In addition, for G3+ cardiac events, arrhythmic and small probability of cardiac events, LAD V20 ((HR: 1.02, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.03, P = 0.012; HR: 1.01, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.005; HR; 1.01, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.012) was also an independent predictive factor. LAD V50 (HR: 1.07, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.10, P <0.001) predicted pericardium effusion events. Moreover, the multivariable analysis revealed that OS was predicted by LAD V30 (HR: 1.03; 95 % CI, 1.01-1.05, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

In the population of ESCC patients receiving RT, we showed that the CS factors had a substantial predictive value for the various types and grades of CEs. The elevated radiation dose of LAD was a significant contributor to a higher rate of cardiac events and a worse prognosis.

The Association of Incidental Radiation Dose to the Heart Base with Overall Survival and Cardiac Events after Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from the NI-HEART Study

AIMS

Cardiac disease is a dose-limiting toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy. The dose to the heart base has been associated with poor survival in multiple institutional and clinical trial datasets using unsupervised, voxel-based analysis. Validation has not been undertaken in a cohort with individual patient delineations of the cardiac base or for the endpoint of cardiac events. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of heart base radiation dose with overall survival and the risk of cardiac events with individual heart base contours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed for baseline patient, tumour and cardiac details and both cancer and cardiac outcomes as part of the NI-HEART study. Three cardiologists verified cardiac events including atrial fibrillation, heart failure and acute coronary syndrome. Cardiac substructure delineations were completed using a validated deep learning-based autosegmentation tool and a composite cardiac base structure was generated. Cox and Fine-Gray regressions were undertaken for the risk of death and cardiac events.

RESULTS

Of 478 eligible patients, most received 55 Gy/20 fractions (96%) without chemotherapy (58%), planned with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (71%). Pre-existing cardiovascular morbidity was common (78% two or more risk factors, 46% one or more established disease). The median follow-up was 21.1 months. Dichotomised at the median, a higher heart base Dmax was associated with poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (20.2 months versus 28.3 months; hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.75, P = 0.0017) and statistical significance was retained in multivariate analyses. Furthermore, heart base Dmax was associated with pooled cardiac events in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.97, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart base Dmax was associated with the rate of death and cardiac events after adjusting for patient, tumour and cardiovascular factors in the NI-HEART study. This validates the findings from previous unsupervised analytical approaches. The heart base could be considered as a potential sub-organ at risk towards reducing radiation cardiotoxicity.

One-year mortality and causes of death after stereotactic radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Patients treated with cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (radioablation) for refractory ventricular arrhythmias are patients with advanced structural heart disease and significant comorbidities. However, data regarding 1-year mortality after the procedure are scarce. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed at determining 1-year mortality after cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias and investigating leading causes of death in this population. MEDLINE/EMBASE databases were searched up to January 2023 for studies including patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Quality of included trials was assessed using the NIH Tool for Case Series Studies (PROSPERO CRD42022379713). A total of 1,151 references were retrieved and evaluated for relevance. Data were extracted from 16 studies, with a total of 157 patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Pooled 1-year mortality was 32 % (95 %CI: 23-41), with almost half of the deaths occurring within three months after treatment. Among the 157 patients, 46 died within the year following cardiac radioablation. Worsening heart failure appeared to be the leading cause of death (52 %), although non-cardiac mortality remained substantial (41 %) in this population. Age≥70yo was associated with a significantly higher 12-month all-cause mortality (p<0.022). Neither target volume size nor radiotherapy device appeared to be associated with 1-year mortality (p = 0.465 and p = 0.199, respectively). About one-third of patients undergoing cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias die within the first year after the procedure. Worsening heart failure appears to be the leading cause of death in this population.

Sinoatrial Node Dose Is Associated With Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Central Lung Cancers

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical consequences of sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrioventricular node (AVN) irradiation in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-institutional retrospective review of patients with primary NSCLC undergoing definitive SBRT for centrally located thoracic tumors from February 2007 to December 2021 was performed. The SAN and AVN were contoured in accordance with a published contouring atlas, and the maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) for each structure were calculated. Sequential log rank testing between the 50th and 90th percentiles was used to identify potential cutoff values for the corresponding dosimetric parameters and overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 93 eligible patients, the median age was 72.5 years (IQR, 66.6-78.3), and median follow-up was 32.4 months (IQR, 13.0-49.6). The median SAN Dmax and Dmean were 95 cGy (range, 9-5394) and 58 cGy (range, 7-3168), respectively. The median AVN Dmax and Dmean were 45 cGy (range, 4-2121) and 34 cGy (range, 3-1667), respectively. Candidate cutoff values for SAN Dmax and Dmean were 1309 and 836 cGy, respectively. No associations between AVN parameters and survival outcomes were identified. Upon multivariate Cox regression, the SAN Dmax cutoff (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03 [1.09-3.79]; P = .026) and SAN Dmean cutoff (HR, 2.22 [1.20-4.12]; P = .011) were significantly associated with overall survival. For noncancer-associated survival, the SAN Dmax cutoff trended toward significance (HR, 2.02 [0.89-4.57]; P = .092), and the SAN Dmean cutoff remained significantly associated (HR, 2.34 [1.05-5.18]; P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing SBRT for NSCLC, SAN Dmax and Dmean were significantly associated with worse overall survival using cut-off values of 1309 and 836 cGy, respectively. Further studies examining the effect of SAN irradiation during SBRT are warranted.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer: A Review

Cardio-oncology currently faces one of the greatest challenges in the field of health care. The main goal of this discipline is to ensure that patients treated for cancer do not suffer or die from cardiovascular disease. The number of studies on the mechanisms of heart injury during cancer treatment is constantly increasing. However, there is insufficient data on heart rhythm disorders that may result from this treatment. This issue seems to be particularly important in patients with lung cancer, in whom anticancer therapy, especially radiotherapy, may contribute to the onset of cardiac arrhythmias. The observed relationship between cardiac dosimetry and radiotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in lung cancer treatment may explain the increased mortality from cardiovascular causes in patients after chest irradiation. Further research is essential to elucidate the role of cardiac arrhythmias in this context. Conversely, recent reports have highlighted the application of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. This review of available studies on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of arrhythmias in patients treated for lung cancer aims to draw attention to the need for regular cardiological monitoring in this group of patients. Improving cardiac care for patients with lung cancer has the potential to enhance their overall therapeutic outcomes.

Predicting Adverse Cardiac Events After Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Radiotherapy may cause grade ≥3 cardiac events, necessitating a better understanding of risk factors. The potential predictive role of imaging biomarkers with radiotherapy doses for cardiac event occurrence has not been studied.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to establish the associations between cardiac substructure dose and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and cardiac event occurrence.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis included patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy (2006-2018). Cardiac substructures, including the left anterior descending coronary artery, left main coronary artery, left circumflex coronary artery, right coronary artery, and TotalLeft (left anterior descending, left main, and left circumflex coronary arteries), were contoured. Doses were measured in 2-Gy equivalent units, and visual CAC scoring was compared with automated scoring. Grade ≥3 adverse cardiac events were recorded. Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic modeling, the log-rank statistic, and competing-risk models were used to measure prediction performance, threshold modeling, and the cumulative incidence of cardiac events, respectively.

Results

Of the 233 eligible patients, 61.4% were men, with a median age of 68.1 years (range: 34.9-90.7 years). The median follow-up period was 73.7 months (range: 1.6-153.9 months). Following radiotherapy, 22.3% experienced cardiac events, within a median time of 21.5 months (range: 1.7-118.9 months). Visual CAC scoring showed significant correlation with automated scoring (r = 0.72; P < 0.001). In a competing-risk multivariable model, TotalLeft volume receiving 15 Gy (per 1 cc; HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.11-1.72; P = 0.004) and CAC score >5 (HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.08-5.86; P = 0.033) were independently associated with cardiac events. A model incorporating age, TotalLeft CAC (score >5), and volume receiving 15 Gy demonstrated a higher incidence of cardiac events for a high-risk group (28.9%) compared with a low-risk group (6.9%) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Adverse cardiac events associated with radiation occur in more than 20% of patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy within a median time of <2 years. The present findings provide further evidence to support significant associations between TotalLeft radiotherapy dose and cardiac events and define CAC as a predictive risk factor.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Identify Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of RTOG 0617

PURPOSE

Dosimetric predictors of toxicity in patients treated with definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer are often identified through trial and error. This study used machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence to empirically characterize dosimetric predictors of toxicity in patients treated as part of a prospective clinical trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A secondary analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617 trial was performed. Multiple ML models were trained to predict grade ≥3 pulmonary, cardiac, and esophageal toxicities using clinical and dosimetric features. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The best performing model for each toxicity was explained using the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) framework; SHAP values were used to identify relevant dosimetric thresholds and were converted to odds ratios (ORs) with confidence intervals (CIs) generated using bootstrapping to obtain quantitative measures of risk. Thresholds were validated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The best-performing models for pulmonary, cardiac, and esophageal toxicities, outperforming logistic regression, were extreme gradient boosting (AUC, 0.739), random forest (AUC, 0.706), and naive Bayes (AUC, 0.721), respectively. For pulmonary toxicity, thresholds of a mean dose >18 Gy (OR, 2.467; 95% CI, 1.049-5.800; P = .038) and lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20) > 37% (OR, 2.722; 95% CI, 1.034-7.163; P = .043) were identified. For esophageal toxicity, thresholds of a mean dose >34 Gy (OR, 4.006; 95% CI, 2.183-7.354; P < .001) and V20 > 37% (OR, 3.725; 95% CI, 1.308-10.603; P = .014) were identified. No significant thresholds were identified for cardiac toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this data set, ML approaches validated known dosimetric thresholds and outperformed logistic regression at predicting toxicity. Furthermore, using explainable artificial intelligence, clinically useful dosimetric thresholds might be identified and subsequently externally validated.

Radiation therapy in the thoracic region: Radio-induced cardiovascular disease, cardiac delineation and sparing, cardiac dose constraints, and cardiac implantable electronic devices

Radiation therapy in the thoracic region may deliver incidental ionizing radiation to the surrounding healthy structures, including the heart. Radio-induced heart toxicity has long been a concern in breast cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma and was deemed a long-term event. However, recent data highlight the need to limit the dose to the heart in less favorable thoracic cancers too, such as lung and esophageal cancers in which incidental irradiation led to increased mortality. This article will summarize available cardiac dose constraints in various clinical settings and the types of radio-induced cardiovascular diseases encountered as well as delineation of cardiac subheadings and management of cardiac devices. Although still not completely deciphered, heart dose constraints remain intensively investigated and the mean dose to the heart is no longer the only dosimetric parameter to consider since the left anterior descending artery as well as the left ventricle should also be part of dosimetry constraints.

Accelerated Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Toxicity Induced by Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer

The number of patients diagnosed with breast cancer and cardiovascular disease is continuously rising. Treatment options for breast cancer have greatly evolved, but radiotherapy (RT) still has a key role in it. Despite many advances in RT techniques, cardiotoxicity is one of the most important side effects. The new cardio-oncology guidelines recommend a baseline evaluation, risk stratification and follow-up of these patients. Cardiotoxicity induced by RT can be represented by almost all forms of cardiovascular disease, with atherosclerosis being the most frequent. An interdisciplinary team should manage these patients, in order to have maximum therapeutic effect and minimum cardiovascular toxicity. This review will summarize the current incidence, risk factors, mechanisms and follow-up of RT-induced cardiovascular toxicity.

Demystifying the Results of RTOG 0617: Identification of Dose Sensitive Cardiac Subregions Associated With Overall Survival

INTRODUCTION

The RTOG 0617 trial presented a worse survival for patients with lung cancer treated in the high-dose (74 Gy) arm. In multivariable models, radiation level and whole-heart volumetric dose parameters were associated with survival. In this work, we consider heart subregions to explain the observed survival difference between radiation levels.

METHODS

Voxel-based analysis identified anatomical regions where the dose was associated with survival. Bootstrapping clinical and dosimetric variables into an elastic net model selected variables associated with survival. Multivariable Cox regression survival models assessed the significance of dose to the heart subregion, compared with whole heart v5 and v30. Finally, the trial outcome was assessed after propensity score matching of patients on lung dose, heart subregion dose, and tumor volume.

RESULTS

A total of 458 patients were eligible for voxel-based analysis. A region of significance (p < 0.001) was identified in the base of the heart. Bootstrapping selected mean lung dose, radiation level, log tumor volume, and heart region dose. The multivariable Cox model exhibited dose to the heart region (p = 0.02), and tumor volume (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with survival, and radiation level was not significant (p = 0.07). The models exhibited that whole heart v5 and v30 were not associated with survival, with radiation level being significant (p < 0.05). In the matched cohort, no significant survival difference was seen between radiation levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose to the base of the heart is associated with overall survival, partly removing the radiation level effect, and explaining that worse survival in the high-dose arm is owing, in part, to the heart subregion dose. By defining a heart avoidance region, future dose escalation trials may be feasible.

Radiation Exposure of Cardiac Conduction Nodes During Breast Proton Therapy

Purpose

The exposition of cardiac conduction system during breast radiation therapy has never been studied, despite the increasing use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, which exposes larger volume to low-dose bath. We evaluated conduction node exposure during breast irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy and estimated the potential dosimetric benefit with intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Materials and Methods

Atrioventricular (AVN) and sinoatrial (SAN) nodes were retrospectively delineated according to published guidelines on the simulation computed tomography scans of 12 breast cancer patients having undergone conserving surgery and adjuvant locoregional volumetric modulated arc therapy. Intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment was replanned on the simulation computed tomography scans for all breast cancer patients. Mean and maximum doses delivered to the SAN and the AVN were retrieved and compared. Correlation coefficients were calculated between doses to the SAN or the AVN and the whole heart.

Results

Average mean doses delivered to the SAN and AVN were 2.8 and 2.3 Gy, respectively, for left-sided irradiation and 9.6 and 3.6 Gy, respectively, for right-sided irradiation. Average maximum doses to the SAN and AVN were 3.5 Gy and 2.8 Gy, respectively, for left-sided irradiation and 13.1 and 4.6 Gy, respectively, for right-sided irradiation. Intensity-modulated proton therapy significantly reduced mean and maximum doses to the SAN and AVN. Correlations between doses to the SAN or AVN and whole heart were usually significant.

Conclusion

SAN and AVN can be substantially exposed during breast volumetric modulated arc therapy, especially for right-sided irradiation. Cardiotoxicity studies evaluating conduction node exposure might define dose constraints and criteria for additional cardiac-sparing techniques, such as respiratory techniques or proton therapy, which could benefit patients with underlying rhythmic or conduction disorders.

Cardiovascular Toxicity and Risk Mitigation with Lung Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with lung cancer often have concomitant cardiovascular comorbidities and receive potentially cardiotoxic therapies. As oncologic outcomes improve, the relative impact of cardiovascular disease on lung cancer survivors is expected to increase. This review summarizes cardiovascular toxicities observed after treatment for lung cancer, as well as recommended risk mitigation strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of cardiovascular events may be observed after surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy. The risk of cardiovascular events after radiation therapy (RT) is higher than previously appreciated (23-32%), and RT dose to the heart is a modifiable risk factor. Targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been associated with cardiovascular toxicities distinct from those of cytotoxic agents; these are rare but can be severe and require prompt intervention. Optimization of cardiovascular risk factors is important at all phases of cancer therapy and survivorship. Recommended practices for baseline risk assessment, preventive measures, and appropriate monitoring are discussed herein.

Dosimetric evaluation of the benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for locoregional irradiation of right breast cancer with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT)

INTRODUCTION

Right-lateralized cardiac substructures can be substantially exposed during right breast cancer (R-BC) radiotherapy. The cardiac benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is established in combination with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) for left breast cancer with regional node irradiation but is unknown for R-BC. This study evaluated the dosimetric benefit of DIBH for locoregional irradiation of R-BC with VMAT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients treated for R-BC with adjuvant locoregional DIBH-VMAT in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Institut Curie (Paris, France) until December 2022 were included, corresponding to 15 patients. FB- and DIBH-VMAT plans were compared both for a normofractionated regimen (50 Gy/25fx) used for treatment and a replanned hypofractionated regimen (40 Gy/15fx). Dose to the heart, cardiac substructures (sinoatrial node (SAN), atrio-ventricular node (AVN), right coronary artery, left anterior descending coronary artery, left ventricle), ipsilateral lung and liver were retrieved and compared.

RESULTS

Mean heart dose (MHD) was 3.33 Gy with FB vs. 3.10 Gy with DIBH on normofractionated plans (p = 0.489), and 2.58 Gy with FB vs. 2.41 Gy with DIBH on hypofractionated plan (p = 0.489). The benefit of DIBH was not significant for any cardiac substructure. The most exposed cardiac substructure were the SAN (mean dose of 6.62 Gy for FB- and 5.64 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans) and the RCA (mean dose of 4.21 Gy for FB- and 4.06 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans). The maximum benefit was observed for the RCA with a median individual dose reduction of 0.84 Gy on normofractionated plans (p = 0.599). No significant dosimetric difference were observed for right lung. Liver mean dose was significantly lower with DIBH with median values decreasing from 2.54 Gy to 0.87 Gy (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Adding DIBH to efficient cardiac-sparing radiotherapy techniques, such as VMAT, is not justified in the general case for locoregional R-BC irradiation. Specific R-BC patient subpopulations who could benefit from additional DIBH combination with locoregional VMAT are yet to be identified.