Predictors of first pass isolation of the pulmonary veins in real world ablations: An analysis of 2671 patients from the REAL-AF registry

INTRODUCTION

During atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA), achievement of first pass isolation (FPI) reflects effective lesion formation and predicts long-term freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. We aim to determine the clinical and procedural predictors of pulmonary vein FPI.

METHODS

We reviewed AFA procedures in a multicenter prospective registry of AFA (REAL-AF). A multivariate ordinal logistic regression, weighted by inverse proceduralist volume, was used to determine predictors of FPI.

RESULTS

A total of 2671 patients were included with 1806 achieving FPI in both vein sides, 702 achieving FPI in one, and 163 having no FPI. Individually, age, left atrial (LA) scar, higher power usage (50 W), greater posterior contact force, ablation index >350 posteriorly, Vizigo™ sheath utilization, nonstandard ventilation, and high operator volume (>6 monthly cases) were all related to improved odds of FPI. Conversely sleep apnea, elevated body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, LA enlargement, antiarrhythmic drug use, and center's higher fluoroscopy use were related to reduced odds of FPI. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI > 30 (OR 0.78 [0.64-0.96]) and LA volume (OR per mL increase = 1.00 [0.99-1.00]) predicted lower odds of achieving FPI, whereas significant left atrial scarring (>20%) was related to higher rates of FPI. Procedurally, the use of high power (50 W) (OR 1.32 [1.05-1.65]), increasing force posteriorly (OR 2.03 [1.19-3.46]), and nonstandard ventilation (OR 1.26 [1.00-1.59]) predicted higher FPI rates. At a site level, high procedural volume (OR 1.89 [1.48-2.41]) and low fluoroscopy centers (OR 0.72 [0.61-0.84]) had higher rates of FPI.

CONCLUSION

FPI rates are affected by operator experience, patient comorbidities, and procedural strategies. These factors may be postulated to impact acute lesion formation.

Use of intracardiac echocardiography in vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Few methods have been reported to demonstrate real-time effects during vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

OBJECTIVE

This study was to evaluate the impact of left atrial (LA) monitoring using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during VOM ethanol infusion.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive patients with PeAF who underwent VOM ethanol infusion followed by radiofrequency (RF) ablation were included. Patients with findings on ICE consistent with echogenic streaming in the LA and with increased myocardial local echogenicity along the VOM area were placed into one group (group A) and those without into the other group (group B). Outcomes between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (62%) were placed into group A. A new ethanol-induced low-voltage area in group A was larger than that in group B (8.5 cm2 [5.5-10.2 cm2] and 4.0 cm2 (2.4-6.3 cm2]; P < .001). The RF ablation time required to achieve MI block was reduced in group A patients (263.0 seconds [196.0-351.0 seconds] vs 417.0 seconds [315.0-709.5 seconds] in group B patients; P < .001). MI block was achieved in 46 patients (100%) via an endocardial approach in group A and 27 patients (96.4%) in group B (extra coronary sinus ablation in 4 patients). One patient developed clinically significant pericardial effusions and required pericardiocentesis in group B.

CONCLUSION

Presence of increased myocardial local echogenicity at the ridge and consistent echogenic streaming in the LA detected by ICE-based imaging during VOM ethanol infusion suggests increased ablated tissue in that region and lower RF ablation time during ablation for PeAF.

Diagnosis and Management of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

Importance

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), defined as tachyarrhythmias that originate from or conduct through the atria or atrioventricular node with abrupt onset, affects 168 to 332 per 100 000 individuals. Untreated PSVT is associated with adverse outcomes including high symptom burden and tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy.

Observations

Approximately 50% of patients with PSVT are aged 45 to 64 years and 67.5% are female. Most common symptoms include palpitations (86%), chest discomfort (47%), and dyspnea (38%). Patients may rarely develop tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy (1%) due to PSVT. Diagnosis is made on electrocardiogram during an arrhythmic event or using ambulatory monitoring. First-line acute therapy for hemodynamically stable patients includes vagal maneuvers such as the modified Valsalva maneuver (43% effective) and intravenous adenosine (91% effective). Emergent cardioversion is recommended for patients who are hemodynamically unstable. Catheter ablation is safe, highly effective, and recommended as first-line therapy to prevent recurrence of PSVT. Meta-analysis of observational studies shows single catheter ablation procedure success rates of 94.3% to 98.5%. Evidence is limited for the effectiveness of long-term pharmacotherapy to prevent PSVT. Nonetheless, guidelines recommend therapies including calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, and antiarrhythmic agents as management options.

Conclusion and Relevance

Paroxysmal SVT affects both adult and pediatric populations and is generally a benign condition. Catheter ablation is the most effective therapy to prevent recurrent PSVT. Pharmacotherapy is an important component of acute and long-term management of PSVT.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) are considered to be acceptable as LBBAP strategies. Differences in clinical outcomes between LBBP and LVSP are yet to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of LBBP vs LVSP vs BIVP for CRT.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter observational study, LBBP was compared with LVSP and BIVP in patients undergoing CRT. The primary composite outcome was freedom from heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, postprocedural NYHA functional class, and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 415 patients were included (LBBP: n = 141; LVSP: n = 31; BIVP: n = 243), with a median follow-up of 399 days (Q1-Q3: 249.5-554.8 days). Freedom from the primary composite outcomes was 76.6% in the LBBP group and 48.4% in the LVSP group (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.143-1.649; P = 0.001), driven by a 31.4% absolute increase in freedom from HF-related hospitalizations (83% vs 51.6%; HR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.856-6.791; P < 0.001) without differences in all-cause mortality. LBBP was also associated with a higher freedom from the primary composite outcome compared with BIVP (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.175-1.730; P < 0.001), with no difference between LVSP and BIVP.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CRT, LBBP was associated with improved outcomes compared with LVSP and BIVP, while outcomes between BIVP and LVSP are similar.

One-year mortality and causes of death after stereotactic radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Patients treated with cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (radioablation) for refractory ventricular arrhythmias are patients with advanced structural heart disease and significant comorbidities. However, data regarding 1-year mortality after the procedure are scarce. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed at determining 1-year mortality after cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias and investigating leading causes of death in this population. MEDLINE/EMBASE databases were searched up to January 2023 for studies including patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Quality of included trials was assessed using the NIH Tool for Case Series Studies (PROSPERO CRD42022379713). A total of 1,151 references were retrieved and evaluated for relevance. Data were extracted from 16 studies, with a total of 157 patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Pooled 1-year mortality was 32 % (95 %CI: 23-41), with almost half of the deaths occurring within three months after treatment. Among the 157 patients, 46 died within the year following cardiac radioablation. Worsening heart failure appeared to be the leading cause of death (52 %), although non-cardiac mortality remained substantial (41 %) in this population. Age≥70yo was associated with a significantly higher 12-month all-cause mortality (p<0.022). Neither target volume size nor radiotherapy device appeared to be associated with 1-year mortality (p = 0.465 and p = 0.199, respectively). About one-third of patients undergoing cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias die within the first year after the procedure. Worsening heart failure appears to be the leading cause of death in this population.

50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and freedom from atrial arrhythmias while decreasing procedural time. However, the optimal power setting in terms of safety and efficacy has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of 50-W vs 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry (Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) undergoing HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF, either using 50-W or 40-W, were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of any procedural complication at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and the occurrence of transient ischemic attack or stroke at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months was 80.7% in the 50-W group and 77.3% in the 40-W group (Log-rank P = 0.387). The primary safety outcome occurred in 3.7% of patients in the 50-W group vs 2.8% in the 40-W group (P = 0.646). The 50-W group had a higher rate of first-pass PVI (82.3% vs 76.2%; P = 0.040) as well as shorter procedural (67 minutes [IQR: 54-87.5 minutes] vs 93 minutes [IQR: 80.5-111 minutes]; P < 0.001) and radiofrequency ablation times (15 minutes [IQR: 11.4-20 minutes] vs 27 minutes [IQR: 21.5-34.6 minutes]; P < 0.001) than the 40-W group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias or procedural safety outcomes between 50-W and 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF. The use of 50-W was associated with a higher rate of first-pass PVI as well as shorter procedural times.

Chinese expert consensus on the construction of the fluoroless cardiac electrophysiology laboratory and related techniques

Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation has been widely introduced for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. The demand for catheter ablation continues to grow rapidly as the level of recommendation for catheter ablation. Traditional catheter ablation is performed under the guidance of X-rays. X-rays can help display the heart contour and catheter position, but the radiobiological effects caused by ionizing radiation and the occupational injuries worn caused by medical staff wearing heavy protective equipment cannot be ignored. Three-dimensional mapping system and intracardiac echocardiography can provide detailed anatomical and electrical information during cardiac electrophysiological study and ablation procedure, and can also greatly reduce or avoid the use of X-rays. In recent years, fluoroless catheter ablation technique has been well demonstrated for most arrhythmic diseases. Several centers have reported performing procedures in a purposefully designed fluoroless electrophysiology catheterization laboratory (EP Lab) without fixed digital subtraction angiography equipment. In view of the lack of relevant standardized configurations and operating procedures, this expert task force has written this consensus statement in combination with relevant research and experience from China and abroad, with the aim of providing guidance for hospitals (institutions) and physicians intending to build a fluoroless cardiac EP Lab, implement relevant technologies, promote the standardized construction of the fluoroless cardiac EP Lab.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing as Initial Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVp).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between LBBAP and BiVp as an initial implant strategy for CRT.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter, observational, nonrandomized study, first-time CRT implant recipients with LBBAP or BiVp were included. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcomes were acute and long-term complications. Secondary outcomes included postprocedural New York Heart Association functional class and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients (median follow-up of 340 days [IQR: 206-477 days]) were included. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 24.2% in the LBBAP vs 42.4% in the BiVp (HR: 0.621 [95% CI: 0.415-0.93]; P = 0.021) group, driven by a reduction in HF-related hospitalizations (22.6% vs 39.5%; HR: 0.607 [95% CI: 0.397-0.927]; P = 0.021) without significant difference in all-cause mortality (5.5% vs 11.9%; P = 0.19) or differences in long-term complications (LBBAP: 9.4% vs BiVp: 15.2%; P = 0.146). LBBAP resulted in shorter procedural (95 minutes [IQR: 65-120 minutes] vs 129 minutes [IQR: 103-162 minutes]; P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (12 minutes [IQR: 7.4-21.1 minutes] vs 21.7 minutes [IQR: 14.3-30 minutes]; P < 0.001), shorter QRS duration (123.7 ± 18 milliseconds vs 149.3 ± 29.1 milliseconds; P < 0.001), and higher postprocedural left ventricular ejection fraction (34.1% ± 12.5% vs 31.4% ± 10.8%; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP as an initial CRT strategy resulted in a lower risk of HF-related hospitalizations compared to BiVp. A reduction in procedural and fluoroscopy times, shorter paced QRS duration, and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction compared with BiVp were observed.

Sustained Apnea for Epicardial Access With Right Ventriculography: The SAFER Epicardial Approach

BACKGROUND

Epicardial access (EA) has emerged as an increasingly important approach for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and to perform other interventional cardiology procedures. EA is frequently underutilized because the current approach is challenging and carries a high risk of life-threatening complications.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the SAFER (Sustained Apnea for Epicardial Access With Right Ventriculography) epicardial approach.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent EA with the SAFER technique were included in this multicenter study. The primary efficacy outcome was the successful achievement of EA. The primary safety outcomes included right ventricular (RV) perforation, major hemorrhagic pericardial effusion (HPE), and bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics and any complications. Our results were compared with those from previous studies describing other EA techniques to assess differences in outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients undergoing EA with the SAFER approach from June 2021 to February 2023 were included. EA was used for ventricular tachycardia ablation in 98 patients (93.4%), left atrial appendage closure in 6 patients (5.7%), and phrenic nerve displacement in 1 patient (0.9%). EA was successful in all subjects (100%). The median time to EA was 7 minutes (IQR: 5-14 minutes). No cases of RV perforation, HPE, or need of surgical intervention were observed in this cohort. Comparing our results with previous studies about EA, the SAFER epicardial approach resulted in a significant reduction in major pericardial bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAFER epicardial approach is a simple, efficient, effective, and low-cost technique easily reproducible across multiple centers. It is associated with lower complication rates than previously reported techniques for EA.

High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Improves Long-Term Outcomes in AF Ablation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-frequency, low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and simple strategy to improve catheter stability and first-pass isolation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. However, the impact of this technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess acute and long-term outcomes of HFLTV ventilation compared with standard ventilation (SV) during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter registry (REAL-AF), patients undergoing PAF ablation using either HFLTV or SV were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and hospitalizations at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 661 patients were included. Compared with those in the SV group, patients in the HFLTV group had shorter procedural (66 [IQR: 51-88] minutes vs 80 [IQR: 61-110] minutes; P < 0.001), total RF (13.5 [IQR: 10-19] minutes vs 19.9 [IQR: 14.7-26.9] minutes; P < 0.001), and PV RF (11.1 [IQR: 8.8-14] minutes vs 15.3 [IQR: 12.4-20.4] minutes; P < 0.001) times. First-pass PV isolation was higher in the HFLTV group (66.6% vs 63.8%; P = 0.036). At 12 months, 185 of 216 (85.6%) in the HFLTV group were free from all-atrial arrhythmia, compared with 353 of 445 (79.3%) patients in the SV group (P = 0.041). HLTV was associated with a 6.3% absolute reduction in all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, lower rate of AF-related symptoms (12.5% vs 18.9%; P = 0.046), and hospitalizations (1.4% vs 4.7%; P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

HFLTV ventilation during catheter ablation of PAF improved freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF-related symptoms, and AF-related hospitalizations with shorter procedural times.

Performance of the REAL-AF Same-Day Discharge Protocol in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been widely adopted. Nevertheless, planned SDD has been performed by using subjective criteria rather than standardized protocols.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the previously described SDD protocol in a prospective multicenter study.

METHODS

Using the REAL-AF (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) SDD protocol eligibility criteria (stable anticoagulation, no bleeding history, left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, no pulmonary disease, no procedures within 60 days, and body mass index <35 kg/m2), operators prospectively determined whether patients undergoing ablation of AF were candidates for SDD (SDD vs non-SDD groups). Successful SDD was achieved if the patient met the protocol discharge criteria. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of SDD. The primary safety endpoints were readmission rates as well as acute and subacute complications. The secondary endpoints included procedural characteristics and freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias.

RESULTS

A total of 2,332 patients were included. The REAL-AF SDD protocol identified 1,982 (85%) patients as potential candidates for SDD. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 1,707 (86.1%) patients. The readmission rate for SDD vs non-SDD group was similar (0.8% vs 0.9%; P = 0.924). The SDD group had a lower acute complication rate than the non-SDD group (0.8% vs 2.9%; P < 0.001), and there was no difference in the subacute complication rate between groups (P = 0.513). Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was comparable between groups (P = 0.212).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, multicenter prospective registry, the use of a standardized protocol showed the safety of SDD after catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF. (Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation [REAL-AF]; NCT04088071).

Intracardiac echocardiography is a safe and effective alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage thrombus evaluation at the time of atrial fibrillation ablation: The ICE-TEE study

BACKGROUND

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) technology has been increasingly accepted as an integral part of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. It is still unknown whether ICE can routinely replace transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for routine thrombus screening in non-selective AF patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether ICE can routinely replace TEE in screening for left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in general patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF.

METHODS

A total of 2003 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were included. 1155 patients (ICE group) received intra-procedural ICE examination for LA/LAA thrombus screening, while 848 patients (TEE group) received pre-procedure TEE examination. The incidence of thrombus, peri-procedure complications, and hospital efficiency were assessed.

RESULTS

The LA and LAA were adequately visualized in all patients. Five patients in the ICE group and 15 patients in the TEE group were found to have LAA thrombus. The incidence of major periprocedural thrombo-embolic events was comparable between two groups (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p = .76), none were due to undetected LA/LAA thrombus. Other major periprocedural complications occurred at similar rates in both groups, while post-procedure fever was less common in the ICE group (12.7% vs. 17.4%, p < .001). Procedure times and hospital length of stay were both shorter in the ICE group (142 min [87-197 min] vs. 150 min [95-205 min], and 3[2-4] day vs. 4[3-5] day, respectively, both p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE can replace TEE for atrial thrombus screening in AF patients undergoing ablation without increased complications. An "ICE replacing TEE" workflow can also reduce the incidence of postoperative fever and improve hospital efficiency.

Intracardiac echocardiography Chinese expert consensus

In recent years, percutaneous catheter interventions have continuously evolved, becoming an essential strategy for interventional diagnosis and treatment of many structural heart diseases and arrhythmias. Along with the increasing complexity of cardiac interventions comes ever more complex demands for intraoperative imaging. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is well-suited for these requirements with real-time imaging, real-time monitoring for intraoperative complications, and a well-tolerated procedure. As a result, ICE is increasingly used many types of cardiac interventions. Given the lack of relevant guidelines at home and abroad and to promote and standardize the clinical applications of ICE, the members of this panel extensively evaluated relevant research findings, and they developed this consensus document after discussions and correlation with front-line clinical work experience, aiming to provide guidance for clinicians and to further improve interventional cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment procedures.

The effect of ionizing radiation through cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy on myocardial tissue for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: A review

Cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (cSBRT) is a non-invasive treatment modality that has been recently reported as an effective treatment for ventricular arrhythmias refractory to medical therapy and catheter ablation. The approach leverages tools developed and refined in radiation oncology, where experience has been accumulated in the treatment of a wide variety of malignant conditions. However, important differences exist between rapidly dividing malignant tumor cells and fully differentiated myocytes in pathologically remodeled ventricular myocardium, which represent the respective radiation targets. Despite its initial success, little is known about the radiobiology of the anti-arrhythmic effect cSBRT. Pre-clinical data indicates a late fibrotic effect of that appears between 3 and 4 months following cSBRT, which may result in conduction slowing and block. However, there is clear clinical evidence of an anti-arrhythmic effect of cSBRT that precedes the appearance of radiation induced fibrosis for which the mechanism is unclear. In addition, the data to date suggests that even the late anti-arrhythmic effect of cSBRT is not fully attributable to radiation.-induced fibrosis. Pre-clinical data has identified upregulation of proteins expected to result in both increased cell-to-cell coupling and excitability in the early post cSBRT period and demonstrated an associated increase in myocardial conduction velocity. These observations indicate a complex response to radiotherapy and highlight the lack of clarity regarding the different stages of the anti-arrhythmic mechanism of cSBRT. It may be speculated that in the future cSBRT therapy could be planned to deliver both early and late radiation effects titrated to optimize the combined anti-arrhythmic efficacy of the treatment. In addition to these outstanding mechanistic questions, the optimal patient selection, radiation modality, radiation dose and treatment planning strategy are currently being investigated. In this review, we consider the structural and functional effect of radiation on myocardium and the possible anti-arrhythmic mechanisms of cSBRT. Review of the published data highlights the exciting prospects for the development of knowledge and understanding in this area in which so many outstanding questions exist.

Current Understanding of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: From Pulmonary Vein to Epicardium

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is common, with pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection considered the most likely cause. However, technologies such as contact force-sensing, irrigated catheters, and ablation index (AI)-guided ablation strategies have resulted in more durable PV isolation. As a result, it is difficult to predict which patients will develop AF recurrence despite durable PV isolation, with evolving non-PV atrial substrates thought to be a key contributor to late recurrences. Deciphering the complex mechanisms of AF recurrence beyond the cornerstone of PV isolation therefore remains challenging. Recently, there have been several important advances that may lead to better understanding and treatment of this challenging clinical entity: percutaneous epicardial access and mapping, late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI), improvements in high-resolution electroanatomic mapping, and new ablation energy sources, specifically pulsed-field ablation. This review aims to synthesize the current literature in an effort to better understand arrhythmia mechanisms and treatment targets in patients with AF/Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence post-ablation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cost of cardiac stereotactic body radioablation therapy versus catheter ablation for treatment of ventricular tachycardia

AIMS

To compare the cost of cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) vs catheter ablation for treating ventricular tachycardia (VT).

BACKGROUND

Cardiac SBRT is a novel way of treating refractory VT that may be less costly than catheter ablation, owing to its non-invasive, outpatient nature. However, the true costs of either procedure are not well described, which could help inform a more appropriate reimbursement for cardiac SBRT than simply cross-indexing existing procedural rates.

METHODS

Process maps were derived for the full patient care cycle of both procedures using time-driven activity-based costing. Step-by-step timestamps were collected prospectively from a 10-patient SBRT cohort and retrospectively from a 59-patient catheter ablation cohort. Individual costs were estimated by multiplying timestamps with capacity cost rates (CCRs) for personnel, space, equipment, consumable, and indirect resources. These were summed into total cost, which for cardiac SBRT was compared with current catheter ablation and single-fraction lung SBRT reimbursements, both potential reference rates for cardiac SBRT.

RESULTS

The direct and total procedural costs of cardiac SBRT ($7,549 and $10,621) were 49% and 54% less than those of VT ablation ($14,707 and $23,225). These costs were significantly different from current reimbursement for catheter ablation ($22,692) and lung SBRT ($6,329). After including hospitalization expenses (≥$15,000), VT ablation cost at least $27,604 more to furnish than cardiac SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

TDABC can be a helpful tool for assessing healthcare costs, including novel treatment approaches. In addition to its clinical benefits, cardiac SBRT may provide significant cost reduction opportunities for treatment of VT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The wall of unintended consequences: is the main benefit of posterior LA wall isolation simply more durable pulmonary vein isolation?

Medicine is rife with therapies originally developed for a specific purpose, yet after some time, the true benefit is determined to lie elsewhere - examples of the "law of unintended consequences". This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Practice Patterns of Operators Participating in the Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (REAL-AF) Registry

BACKGROUND

The Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (REAL-AF) is a multicenter prospective registry of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We sought to describe the baseline workflows of REAL-AF operators.

METHODS

REAL-AF enrolls high volume minimum fluoroscopy radiofrequency ablators. A 150 item questionnaire was administered to participating operators. Responses were analyzed using standard methods.

RESULTS

Forty-two respondents had a mean 178.2 ± 89.2 yearly AF ablations, with 42.4 ± 11.9% being paroxysmal (PAF). Most operators performed ablation with uninterrupted or minimally interrupted anticoagulation (66.7% and 28.6%). Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus was most commonly ruled out with transesophageal echocardiography (33.3% and 42.9% for PAF and persistent AF). Consistent with registry design, radiofrequency energy (92.1% ± 18.8% of cases) and zero fluoroscopy ablation (73.8% goal 0 fluoroscopy) were common. The majority of operators relied on index-guided ablation (90.5%); Mean Visitag surpoint targets were higher anteriorly vs posteriorly (508.3 ± 49.8 vs 392.3 ± 37.0, p < 0.01), but power was similar. There was considerable heterogeneity related to gaps in current knowledge, such as lesion delivery targets and sites of extra-pulmonary vein ablation (most common was the posterior wall followed by the roof). Peri-procedural risk factor management of obesity, hypertension, and sleep apnea was common. There was a mean of 3.0 ± 1.2 follow-up visits at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

REAL-AF operators were high volume low fluoroscopy "real world" operators with good follow-up and adherence to known best-practices. There was disagreement related to knowledge gaps in guidelines.

Selective Interventricular Septal Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: Who Can Benefit?

Introduction: Septal mass reduction is beneficial for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients with severe left ventricular outflow (LVOT) gradient and symptoms, with surgical myectomy or alcohol septal ablation (ASA) currently recommended in selected patients. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hypertrophied septum has been published as a novel method to alleviate LVOT obstruction in small populations. This study aims to investigate factors influencing clinical outcomes of radiofrequency septum ablation.

Methods and Results: In this study, 20 patients with HOCM who underwent endocardial ablation were included. Echocardiography and cardiac MRI (CMR) data was collected and analyzed pre- and (or) post- procedure. Nineteen patients underwent ablation successfully, while ablation was aborted in one patient with prior RBBB due to transient complete atrioventricular block (AVB). After 6 months of follow-up, NYHA heart functional class improved from III (2 - 3) to II (1 - 2) (p < 0.001), and resting LVOT gradient was significantly reduced (87.6 ± 29.5 mmHg vs. 48.1 ± 29.7, p < 0.001). LVOT gradient reduction was significantly higher in patients with limited basal septal hypertrophy (60.9 ± 8.3 vs. 27.9 ± 7.1, p = 0.01), shorter anterior mitral leaflet (56.1 ± 6.4 vs. 20.4 ± 5.0, p < 0.01), and normally positioned papillary muscle (36.9 ± 7.1 vs. 75.0 ± 6.3, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Endocardial septal ablation appears to be a safe and effective procedure for alleviating LVOT gradient in patients with HOCM, especially in those with limited basal septal hypertrophy, shorter anterior mitral leaflet, and normal positioned papillary muscle.

Cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy for ventricular tachycardia: Current experience and technical gaps

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in drug and catheter ablation therapy, long-term recurrence rates for ventricular tachycardia remain suboptimal. Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel treatment that has demonstrated reduction of arrhythmia episodes and favorable short-term safety profile in treatment-refractory patients. Nevertheless, the current clinical experience is early and limited. Recent studies have highlighted variable duration of treatment effect and substantial recurrence rates several months postradiation. Contributing to these differential outcomes are disparate approaches groups have taken in planning and delivering radiation, owing to both technical and knowledge gaps limiting optimization and standardization of cardiac SBRT.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In this report, we review the historical basis for cardiac SBRT and existing clinical data. We then elucidate the current technical gaps in cardiac radioablation, incorporating the current clinical experience, and summarize the ongoing and needed efforts to resolve them.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac SBRT is an emerging therapy that holds promise for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Technical gaps remain, to be addressed by ongoing research and growing clincial experience.