Pathologic Complete Response and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy or Radiotherapy: The NRG/RTOG 9514 and 0630 Nonrandomized Clinical Trials

Pathologic complete response in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy and its correlation with clinical outcomes: A systematic review

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), comprising approximately 1% of adult solid malignancies, are primarily treated with surgery, with the choice of perioperative treatment being a challenging and highly individualized decision. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant modalities in STS predominantly use clinical outcomes or radiologic response as endpoints, with pathologic complete response (pCR) not being employed as a designated study endpoint. Our systematic review aimed to assess the rates of pCR in clinical trials of different neoadjuvant modalities for STS and its correlation with patient clinical outcomes. 23 phase I, II and III studies were included, from which data regarding rates of pCR with each treatment, as well as correlation of pCR with clinical outcomes were retrieved. In 16 trials that assessed pCR, the percentage of patients who achieved a pCR ranged from 8 to 58%. Most of these trials did not aim to establish an association between pCR and clinical outcomes. However, among those that did investigate this correlation, a positive association was identified between pCR and both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). While pCR serves as a crucial marker guiding treatment decisions in other neoplasms like triple negative breast cancer and urothelial cancer, it is not yet used in a similar setting for STS. Our findings indicate variability in patients achieving pCR across different neoadjuvant treatments for STS and a possible positive correlation with patient outcomes. Consequently, we propose considering pCR as a surrogate endpoint in future prospective trials for STS.

A retrospective study on the comparision of pathological tumour necrosis of conventional versus ultrahypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy in localised extremity soft tissue sarcoma and its correlation with clinical outcomes: A retrospective study on the comparision of pathological tumour necrosis of CONV-RT versus UHYPO-RT preoperative radiotherapy in localised extremity soft tissue sarcoma and its correlation with clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to determine if ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHYPO-RT) delivering 6Gy x 5 fractions yields similar tumour necrosis compared to conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT) with 2Gy x 25 fractions in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The clinical significance of tumor necrosis on loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with localised STS treated with CONV-RT or UHYPO-RT followed by surgery were included. Good response was defined as tumour necrosis ≥ 90%, and poor response as < 90%. Mann-Whitney U-test compared median tumour necrosis. Chi-squared analysis was used for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier function estimated LRFS, DDFS, and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients received CONV-RT, and 45 received UHYPO-RT. The median tumour size was 7.0 cm, with the lower extremity being the most common site (55%). Myxofibrosarcoma (39%) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (16%) were the most frequent histologies. The median time from radiotherapy to surgery was 35 days. There was a significant difference in median tumour necrosis between CONV-RT and UHYPO-RT, with rates of 40% and 60%, respectively (p = 0.022). Patients receiving UHYPO-RT had a higher percentage of tumour necrosis at the 90% cutoff, achieving 27% compared to 6% for CONV-RT (p = 0.003). In a median follow-up of 32 months, 12 patients (9%) experienced loco-regional recurrence, 24 patients (19%) faced distant failure, and 19 patients (15%) died from metastatic disease. Patients with < 90% necrosis had higher rates of loco-regional (13% vs. 0%, p = 0.207) and distant failure (25% vs. 0%, p = 0.021). Three-year LRFS was 86% for < 90% necrosis and 100% for ≥ 90% necrosis (p = 0.160). DDFS was 75% for < 90% necrosis versus 100% for ≥ 90% (p = 0.036). OS rates were 79% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.290).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative RT with UHYPO-RT was associated with a higher rate of tumour necrosis ≥ 90% than CONV-RT. Our data suggest that more extensive necrosis is associated with better clinical outcomes.

Comprehensive treatment of primary pelvic synovial sarcoma: A 28-month follow-up case report and review of the literature

Background

Primary synovial sarcoma originating in the pelvis is an extremely rare malignancy, and only a few cases have been reported. Usually, the tumor is detected at an advanced stage, making treatment more difficult. Lacking high-quality research, there are no consensus guidelines for the systemic treatment of the disease.

Case presentation

We admitted a 32-year-old male patient with an MRI suggestive of an 8.2 × 7.7 x 8.9 cm mass in the pelvis with bleeding. After a comprehensive evaluation, the patient underwent surgery, and postoperative pathology suggested biphasic synovial sarcoma. Once the diagnosis was clear, the patient was treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Unfortunately, the patient died due to a recurrence of pelvic synovial sarcoma with multiple metastases throughout the body, with a survival period of 28 months.

Conclusion

Synovial sarcoma, a highly malignant soft tissue tumor, and primary intrapelvic synovial sarcoma are even rarer, with a poor prognosis. Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and MRI can help doctors detect the tumor at an early stage and treat it aggressively, especially with surgical treatment, which can effectively improve the survival rate. Combined with the course of diagnosis and treatment of this case, it is possible to deepen the understanding of primary pelvic synovial sarcoma and discuss appropriate treatment strategies for this rare disease.

Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Should Not Yet Be Used as Standard of Care for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens should not be used as standard of care for localized soft tissue sarcoma.

Use of neoadjuvant paclitaxel in breast angiosarcoma-Impact on surgical resection and response rates

OBJECTIVE

Breast angiosarcoma is a tumor that can arise as a primary breast tumor or in association with prior radiation therapy. Angiosarcomas are uniquely sensitive to paclitaxel. This study evaluated the impact neoadjuvant paclitaxel (NAC) therapy has on surgical outcomes, tumor recurrence, and survival in breast angiosarcomas.

METHODS

Patients with angiosarcoma of the breast, either primary or radiation-associated, were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patients receiving NAC were compared to those treated with upfront surgery. Clinical and pathological variables were compared using Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test, differences in survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with angiosarcoma of the breast were identified, 10 with primary angiosarcoma and 14 with radiation-associated angiosarcoma. Twelve patients received NAC, 6 of each with primary angiosarcoma or radiation-associated angiosarcoma. Of these 12 patients, 11 had a margin negative resection (91%) of which, nine had a complete pathological response on surgical pathology. Of the 12 surgery-first patients, four (n = 4/12, 33%) had positive surgical margins, two of the four underwent reoperation. With a median follow-up of 16 months, four NAC patients had recurrence (33%) compared to six patients in the surgery-first group (58%) (p = 0.41). While not statistically significant, NAC patients had a 33% less risk of recurring compared to surgery-first patients ([hazard ratio =0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.16-2.72; p = 0.6]).

CONCLUSION

NAC for breast angiosarcoma may be associated with high rates of complete pathological response and margin-negative resection. However, this did not impact overall survival. Future prospective control studies and longer follow-up periods are warranted to understand the impact on recurrence and survival.

Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Hypofractionated radiation therapy is being used more frequently for many common cancer sites. Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy treatment regimens have remained the standard of care when radiation therapy is indicated for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The aim of this study was to systematically review published data on the use of preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy as part of a curative treatment paradigm in patients with STS. Herein, we summarize current evidence for the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy in the preoperative treatment of STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a database search for prospectively or retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of STS treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy. Studies evaluating STS of all histologic subtypes affecting extremities or trunks were included in the search. Articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers for inclusion in this review. Patient, treatment, toxicity, and outcome data were recorded and collated from selected studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles are included in this review. Nine prospective trials have been published since 2020. Dose fractionations range from 25 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 28-42.75 Gy in 8-15 fractions. Local control and overall survival outcomes are consistent with historical data for conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Acute toxicity and wound complication rates are in keeping with acceptable results. Late toxicity data are limited and require longer follow-up. Rates of pathologic complete response are promising across all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a growing body of evidence supporting hypofractionation as safe and effective in the preoperative treatment of STS. This review highlights potential areas that could be further investigated to optimize preoperative treatment for STS.

Spatial distribution of tumour immune infiltrate predicts outcomes of patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may modify tumour immune infiltrate. This study characterized immune infiltrate spatial distribution after NAC in primary high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and investigate association with prognosis.

METHODS

The ISG-STS 1001 trial randomized STS patients to anthracycline plus ifosfamide (AI) or a histology-tailored (HT) NAC. Four areas of tumour specimens were sampled: the area showing the highest lymphocyte infiltrate (HI) at H&E; the area with lack of post-treatment changes (highest grade, HG); the area with post-treatment changes (lowest grade, LG); and the tumour edge (TE). CD3, CD8, PD-1, CD20, FOXP3, and CD163 were analyzed at immunohistochemistry and digital pathology. A machine learning method was used to generate sarcoma immune index scores (SIS) that predict patient disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS).

FINDINGS

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-1+ cells together with CD163+ cells were more represented in STS histologies with complex compared to simple karyotype, while CD20+ B-cells were detected in both these histology groups. PD-1+ cells exerted a negative prognostic value irrespectively of their spatial distribution. Enrichment in CD20+ B-cells at HI and TE areas was associated with better patient outcomes. We generated a prognostic SIS for each tumour area, having the HI-SIS the best performance. Such prognostic value was driven by treatment with AI.

INTERPRETATION

The different spatial distribution of immune populations and their different association with prognosis support NAC as a modifier of tumour immune infiltrate in STS.

FUNDING

Pharmamar; Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2019-12370923; GR-2016-02362609]; 5 × 1000 Funds-2016, Italian Ministry of Health; AIRC Grant [ID#28546].

Testing new anticancer drugs before curative locoregional therapies: MDICT 2024 recommendations

Advances in the treatment of cancer have resulted in improved outcomes for patients, but improving the cure rate is a major unmet need. While testing new anticancer drugs in the earliest settings may be attractive as the chance of benefit may be greatest, it is also a setting where researchers must ensure patients are not harmed, by either over or undertreatment, or denial of timely standard curative treatments. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies Taskforce (MDICT) meets immediately before the ESMO-Targeted Anticancer Therapies (ESMO-TAT) meeting, usually held annually in Paris, France, to address questions that are considered important for early academic clinical trials. The focus of the MDICT 2024 was on early, signal-seeking phase clinical trials of new drugs conducted in the neoadjuvant (NEO) setting (NEO-ECTs) rather than pivotal confirmatory NEO trials (NEO-CONFs), which are typically phase III in design. Recommendations encompass four key concepts: patient engagement, reviewing risk-benefit ratio and clinical/ethical equipoise, the requirement for a randomization to reduce bias and allow robust conclusions to be drawn, and the selection of appropriate endpoints. The careful design of NEO-ECTs will allow the testing of new anticancer treatments in earlier disease settings where activity is hoped to result in higher cure rates, while also ensuring that patients are not harmed by delays to curative/definitive treatments nor by long-term or late-onset toxicity and morbidity. Additional research and investigation are required to further define and refine robust endpoints for use in this setting, including imaging, tissue and blood based endpoints.

Regional hyperthermia for soft tissue sarcoma - a survey on current practice, controversies and consensus among 12 European centers

PURPOSE

To analyze the current practice of regional hyperthermia (RHT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at 12 European centers to provide an overview, find consensuses and identify controversies necessary for future guidelines and clinical trials.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, a 27-item questionnaire assessing clinical subjects and procedural details on RHT for STS was distributed to 12 European cancer centers for RHT.

RESULTS

We have identified seven controversies and five consensus points. Of 12 centers, 6 offer both, RHT with chemotherapy (CTX) or with radiotherapy (RT). Two centers only offer RHT with CTX and four centers only offer RHT with RT. All 12 centers apply RHT for localized, high-risk STS of the extremities, trunk wall and retroperitoneum. However, eight centers also use RHT in metastatic STS, five in palliative STS, eight for superficial STS and six for low-grade STS. Pretherapeutic imaging for RHT treatment planning is used by 10 centers, 9 centers set 40-43 °C as the intratumoral target temperature, and all centers use skin detectors or probes in body orifices for thermometry.

DISCUSSION

There is disagreement regarding the integration of RHT in contemporary interdisciplinary care of STS patients. Many clinical controversies exist that require a standardized consensus guideline and innovative study ideas. At the same time, our data has shown that existing guidelines and decades of experience with the technique of RHT have mostly standardized procedural aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

The provided results may serve as a basis for future guidelines and inform future clinical trials for RHT in STS patients.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Patients suffering from locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma often face a high postoperative recurrence rate. Despite aggressive treatment, less than 50% survive beyond five years. Ongoing clinical studies are exploring ways to prolong patient survival, revealing that perioperative chemotherapy can extend both the period of recurrence-free survival and overall survival for this group of patients. Currently, combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a critical treatment approach for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, the effectiveness of this approach in locally advanced patients remains unverified. This article delves into the latest research concerning the use of perioperative chemotherapy coupled with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treatment, and highlights prospective challenges and discusses how to best identify patients who may benefit from combined chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Habitat escalated adaptive therapy (HEAT): a phase 2 trial utilizing radiomic habitat-directed and genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) optimization for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), have significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, with poor response to standard neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Achieving a favorable pathologic response (FPR ≥ 95%) from RT is associated with improved patient outcome. Genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD), a radiation-specific metric that quantifies the expected RT treatment effect as a function of tumor dose and genomics, proposed that STS is significantly underdosed. STS have significant radiomic heterogeneity, where radiomic habitats can delineate regions of intra-tumoral hypoxia and radioresistance. We designed a novel clinical trial, Habitat Escalated Adaptive Therapy (HEAT), utilizing radiomic habitats to identify areas of radioresistance within the tumor and targeting them with GARD-optimized doses, to improve FPR in high-grade STS.

METHODS

Phase 2 non-randomized single-arm clinical trial includes non-metastatic, resectable high-grade STS patients. Pre-treatment multiparametric MRIs (mpMRI) delineate three distinct intra-tumoral habitats based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences. GARD estimates that simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) doses of 70 and 60 Gy in 25 fractions to the highest and intermediate radioresistant habitats, while the remaining volume receives standard 50 Gy, would lead to a > 3 fold FPR increase to 24%. Pre-treatment CT guided biopsies of each habitat along with clip placement will be performed for pathologic evaluation, future genomic studies, and response assessment. An mpMRI taken between weeks two and three of treatment will be used for biological plan adaptation to account for tumor response, in addition to an mpMRI after the completion of radiotherapy in addition to pathologic response, toxicity, radiomic response, disease control, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. Furthermore, liquid biopsy will be performed with mpMRI for future ancillary studies.

DISCUSSION

This is the first clinical trial to test a novel genomic-based RT dose optimization (GARD) and to utilize radiomic habitats to identify and target radioresistance regions, as a strategy to improve the outcome of RT-treated STS patients. Its success could usher in a new phase in radiation oncology, integrating genomic and radiomic insights into clinical practice and trial designs, and may reveal new radiomic and genomic biomarkers, refining personalized treatment strategies for STS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05301283.

TRIAL STATUS

The trial started recruitment on March 17, 2022.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogeneous group of extraskeletal mesenchymal tumors that affect individuals throughout the entire age continuum. Despite this pervasive influence, key differences exist in the presentation of these sarcomas across varying age groups that have prevented a more uniform approach to management. Notably, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is more common in children, while most nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) subtypes are more prevalent in adults. Older patients with NRSTS appear to have more molecularly complex biology and often present with more advanced disease compared with children. Poorer outcome disparities are observed in older patients with RMS despite receiving similar treatment as younger patients. In this review, we highlight differences in epidemiology, biology, and management paradigms for pediatric and adult patients with STS and explore opportunities for a unified approach to enhance the care and outcomes within the AYA population.

Moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy and pathologic response for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and trunk: experience from a tertiary cancer center

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiation therapy following by limb-sparing or conservative surgery is a standard approach for limb and trunk STS. Data supporting hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are scarce albeit biological sensitivity of STS to radiation would justify it. We sought to evaluate the impact of moderate hypofractionation on pathologic response and its influence on oncologic outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From October 2018 to January 2023, 18 patients with limb or trunk STS underwent preoperative radiotherapy at a median dose of 52.5 Gy (range 49.5-60 Gy) in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy (3.3-4 Gy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A favorable pathologic response (fPR) was considered as ≥ 90% tumor necrosis on specimen examination.

RESULTS

All patients completed planned preoperative radiotherapy. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved a fPR, and 7 patients (36.8%) a complete pathologic response with total disappearance of tumor cells. Nine patients (47%) developed grade 1-2 acute skin toxicity, and 7 patients (38.8%) had wound complications on follow-up. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-40), no cases of local relapse were observed, and actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) are 87% and 76.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the presence of a favorable pathologic response (fPR) was associated with improved 3-year OS (100% vs. 56.03%, p = 0.058) and 3-year DMFS (86.91% vs. 31.46%, p = 0.002). Moreover, both complete or partial RECIST response and radiological stabilization of the tumor lesion showed a significant association with higher rates of 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (83% vs. 83% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs. 80% vs. 0, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative moderate hypofractionated radiation treatment for STS is feasible and well tolerated and associates encouraging rates of pathologic response that could have a favorable impact on final outcomes.

What is the optimal (neo)adjuvant strategy of extremity high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS)?

Currently, the standard treatment for extremity high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS) combines surgery and pre- or post-op radiation therapy (RT). In some selected cases, chemotherapy (CT) is incorporated into the therapeutic algorithm as a neoadjuvant approach to enable conservative management. Given the risk of local or metastatic relapse, this paper discusses the potential benefits of CT and RT in high-grade ESTs. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant CT, the prognostic value of the pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment, and the role for an adjuvant "boost" following resection after pre-operative radiotherapy will be discussed.

Case Report: An exceptional response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma following checkpoint inhibitor use

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), is an uncommon malignancy associated with a poor prognosis. As with other forms of sarcoma, surgical resection remains the only form of treatment with curative potential. The role of perioperative systemic therapy has not been definitively elucidated. Due to high recurrence rates and metastatic potential, management of UPS can pose a difficult task for clinicians. In cases of unresectable UPS due to anatomic limitations and in patients with comorbidities and poor performance status (PS), management options are limited. We describe a patient with UPS involving the chest wall with poor PS who achieved complete response (CR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in the setting of prior immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.