1
|
Sewell EK, Milla SS, Dutt M, Riedesel E, Kadom N. A model for teaching radiology to clinical specialty trainees: A pilot study in pediatric neuroradiology and neonatology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2024; 53:679-684. [PMID: 39068100 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
This article describes the development and assessment of a neuroimaging curriculum for neonatology fellows. The curriculum is focused on topics that are relevant to the practice of neonatology and employs contemporary teaching methods, such as flipped classroom, learner engagement, and spaced repetition. Since its implementation 2018 the curriculum has been appreciated by our trainees and demonstrated improvements in trainee knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Sewell
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah S Milla
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Monideep Dutt
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Pediatric Institute of Emory and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Erica Riedesel
- Department of Radiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nadja Kadom
- Department of Radiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ayesa SL, Katelaris AG, Brennan PC, Grieve SM. Medical imaging education opportunities for junior doctors and non-radiologist clinicians: A review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:710-718. [PMID: 34180148 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Medical imaging plays a critical role in clinical decision-making across disciplines, and as such, there is frequent need for non-radiologist clinicians to interact with medical imaging. This review examines the literature about the delivery of medical imaging education to non-radiologist clinicians, spanning junior doctors, advanced trainees and specialists. Knowledge of medical imaging among non-radiologist clinicians is paramount to the quality of patient care, with calls for formal implementation of radiology education into non-imaging specialty training programmes. Overall, there is a demand across non-imaging disciplines for greater formalised medical imaging education. Concerns are raised that too great a reliance on informal methods of teaching radiology, for example in ward settings, results in greater variation in the quality and volume of educational opportunities and risks the perpetuation of erroneous attitudes and practices. The evolution of the medical imaging workplace and increasing utilisation of remote reporting has distanced the collaborative relationship between radiologists and their non-imaging colleagues, diminishing opportunities for ad hoc learning and engagement in larger formalised educational collaborations. Ideally, radiologists should be directly involved in the development and delivery of medical imaging education to post-graduate doctors to not only benefit patient care but also foster inter-specialty relationships and respect. Evidence supports the value of structured radiological teaching opportunities, including tutorials, lectures and electronic resources, in improving medical imaging skills among non-radiologist clinicians. There is wide scope for growth in the e-learning arena to address this demand for quality and accessible imaging education for our non-radiology colleagues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally L Ayesa
- Imaging and Phenotyping Laboratory, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Gosford & Wyong Hospitals, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annette G Katelaris
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick C Brennan
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stuart M Grieve
- Imaging and Phenotyping Laboratory, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dhillon VK, Dailey SH, Akst LM. Microlaryngeal Teaching Courses: A National Survey on Prevalence, Value, and Barriers to Implementation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2019; 129:101-109. [PMID: 31522512 DOI: 10.1177/0003489419876290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the prevalence of microlaryngeal teaching course in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited otolaryngology residency programs in an effort to evaluate the nature, perceived value and barriers to implementation of microlaryngeal courses. METHOD A 14-question survey to all ACGME-accredited otolaryngology programs in the United States. RESULT Out of 119 ACGME-accredited otolaryngology programs identified on the ACGME Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database, responses were received from 67 programs (56%). Although 90% of respondents indicated that instruction courses in one discipline or another existed at their institution for their otolaryngology residents, only 33% indicated that their program offers a hands-on instruction course in microlaryngeal surgery. Of those programs that offered a microlaryngeal surgery course, 100% felt the residents appreciated the course; 95% of those programs that did not have a course felt their residents would appreciate a microlaryngeal course at their institution if they were able to offer one. Among programs without a microlaryngeal teaching course, the largest perceived barriers were cost and availability of appropriate equipment. CONCLUSION Microlaryngeal courses for otolaryngology residency training are limited in availability in the United States, and there is variability in training across the country. All respondents in our survey indicated the value in these courses for microlaryngeal surgical skill training. There is a clear role for increasing availability of low-cost microlaryngeal stations and courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaninder K Dhillon
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda MD, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Seth H Dailey
- Section of Laryngology, Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Lee M Akst
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda MD, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|