Head and Neck Oncology Is on the National Quality Sidelines No Longer-Put Me in, Coach

Factors Associated with Head and Neck Cancer Postoperative Radiotherapy Delays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clincal Practice Guidelines and is a Commission on Cancer quality metric. Factors associated with delays in starting PORT have not been systematically described nor synthesized.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

We included studies describing demographic characteristics, clinical factors, or social determinants of health associated with PORT delay (>6 weeks) in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003. Meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) was performed on nonoverlapping datasets.

RESULTS

Of 716 unique abstracts reviewed, 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 15 in the meta-analysis. Study sample size ranged from 19 to 60,776 patients. In the meta-analysis, factors associated with PORT delay included black race (OR, 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.67), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.17-1.60), Medicaid or no health insurance (OR, 2.01, 95% CI, 1.90-2.13), lower income (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.20-1.59), postoperative admission >7 days (OR, 2.92, 95% CI, 2.31-3.67), and 30-day hospital readmission (OR, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.29-1.47).

CONCLUSION

Patients at greatest risk for a delay in initiating guideline-adherent PORT include those who are from minoritized communities, of lower socioeconomic status, and experience postoperative challenges. These findings provide the foundational evidence needed to deliver targeted interventions to enhance equity and quality in HNSCC care delivery.

Timing of postoperative radiation therapy for major salivary gland cancers

BACKGROUND

The impact of timing of PORT initiation for major salivary gland cancers on survival is unknown. We aim to examine the impact of PORT timeliness on overall survival (OS) of patients with major salivary gland cancers.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) and included patients with major salivary gland cancer treated with surgery and PORT.

RESULTS

In total, 5701 patients were included (3133 [55%] male, 4644 [82%] white, mean age 59 ± 16 years). For the overall cohort, PORT >6 weeks was not associated with decreased OS (1.00 aHR, 95% CI 0.89-1.11). When specifically examining patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma, PORT >6 weeks was associated with a decreased OS (1.27 aHR, 95% CI 1.01-1.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit for initiating PORT within 6 weeks for patients with salivary gland malignancies. Subset analysis did support initiating PORT within 6 weeks after resection for patients with mucoepidermoid carcinomas. This was not demonstrated in other major salivary gland cancer histologies.

Planned Dental Extractions After Radiation Therapy

Importance

Nonrestorable teeth are recommended to be extracted prior to radiation therapy (RT). Occasionally, preradiation extractions introduce unacceptable delays in treatment initiation. Planned dental extractions immediately postradiation presents an alternative strategy, though outcomes are uncertain.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of dental extractions immediately postradiation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prospective cohort study including patients planned for curative-intent RT but unable or unwilling to proceed with 1 or more extractions recommended pretreatment was carried out. From January 2020 to September 2022, 58 patients were screened and 50 enrolled. The dental care was performed at a single academic department and the cancer care at regional centers. Analysis took place between September 22, 2023, and June 10, 2024.

Exposure

On completion of RT, patients were recommended to complete extractions as soon as feasible, and ideally within 4 months.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the actuarial cumulative incidence of exposed alveolar bone noted by any practitioner at any time after extraction, calculated using Gray method with death as a competing risk. As a pilot study, no formal power calculation was performed; resources allowed for 50 evaluable patients.

Results

Among the 50 participants enrolled, RT was nonoperative for 32 patients (64%) and postoperative for 18 patients (36%). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was delivered in all patients. Of the 50 patients, 20 (40%) declined dental extractions immediately postradiation and the remaining 30 (60%) underwent a median (range) of 8.5 (1-28) extractions at a median (range) of 64.5 (13-152) days after RT. The median (IQR) follow-up for survivors without exposed bone was 26 (17-35) months from the end of RT. The 2-year cumulative incidence of any exposed bone was 27% (95% CI, 14%-40%). The 2-year incidence of exposed bone for those who underwent dental extractions immediately postradiation was 40% (95% CI, 22%-58%) and 7% (95% CI, 0%-22%) for those who did not. Of the 13 who developed exposed bone: 4 resolved, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 8 were confirmed as osteoradionecrosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that postradiation dental extractions incur considerable risk, even if performed within a 4-month window.

Disparities in Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

This article examines disparities in head and neck cancer across the cancer care continuum. It provides a public health lens to understand multilevel determinants of health behavior and the importance of social determinants of health. This article reviews the evidence base showing profound differences in incidence, treatment, and survival for patients with head and neck cancer by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geography. Continued research is needed to understand and address disparities for patients with head and neck cancer.

Return to Intended Oncological Therapy: State of the Art and Perspectives

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Despite advances in surgical procedures, cancer recurrence still affects a substantial proportion of patients for whom surgery is considered a curative therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RIOT, addressing its definition, influencing factors, and clinical implications.

FINDINGS

RIOT can be defined as a continuous variable as the time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant therapies or categorically as whether patients can successfully receive adjuvant therapies or not. Factors influencing RIOT are age, sex, socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, physical performance and comorbidities, and quality of anesthesia and surgical care. Adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy are often administered to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery and improve survival. Return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) has emerged as a promising outcome metric reflecting patients' functional recovery after surgery and their ability to receive adjuvant therapies.

The impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for major head and neck oncologic surgery on postoperative complications and adjuvant treatment delivery

OBJECTIVE

The Commission on Cancer (CoC) recently introduced a quality metric to optimize time between major head and neck surgery and adjuvant treatment (TAT) ≤6 weeks, as TAT delay adversely impacts patient survival. This study evaluates whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for this population reduces the rate of postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and TAT.

METHODS

Patients undergoing larynx or oral cavity resection with free flap reconstruction, ERAS, and adjuvant treatment after 2018 were compared to a historical pre-ERAS cohort. Patients underwent surgery at a single-institution tertiary referral center for complex head and neck oncology. Differences between groups were compared by chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. TAT >6 weeks was evaluated with univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine pre-ERAS patients were compared to 39 ERAS patients. No demographic differences existed between groups. LOS was improved with ERAS (p = 0.005). ERAS patients were discharged to home and returned to their activities of daily living (ADL) earlier (p = 0.004, 0.001). ADL recovery was associated with on-time TAT ≤42 days on univariate analysis (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13-1.63, p = 0.001). TAT delay was less frequent with ERAS (51.3% vs. 69.2%), but this was not significant after multivariable logistic regression (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

ERAS decreases LOS and returns advanced head and neck cancer patients to their ADL sooner. Postoperative ADL recovery independently predicts on-time adjuvant treatment. Still, compliance beyond 50% with the TAT ≤6 weeks CoC quality metric remains a major treatment barrier.

Treatment Delay and HPV Status on OPSCC With Upfront Surgery: Analysis of National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effect of treatment delay on survival in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients undergoing primary surgical resection.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the 2010-2017 National Cancer Database.

SETTING

Multicenter database study.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old with OPSCC and known HPV status, treated surgically with or without postoperative radiation/chemotherapy were included. Two cohorts based on HPV status were grouped by time to treatment initiation (TD-TI, ≤30, 31-60, ≥61 days) and surgery to radiotherapy (TS-RT, ≤42, 43-66, ≥67 days). Univariate, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariate analyses assessed correlations between demographic and clinical factors with overall survival in treatment delay groups.

RESULTS

Included were 1643 HPV-positive OPSCC patients and 391 HPV-negative OPSCC patients. No associations between survival and gender, age, race, insurance, or radiotherapy length were observed. Regardless of HPV status, larger tumor size (>2 cm) and lymphovascular invasion predicted worse survival. HPV negative patients with >4 lymph nodes involved had 2.5× greater mortality risk (P = .039). Robotic surgery was associated with improved survival only in HPV positive patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, P < .001). In HPV positive patients, higher TD-TI related to lower mean survival, although this was not significant on multivariate analysis. HPV negative patients with >42 days of TS-RT had decreased survival (43-66 days, HR 1.63, P = .049; ≥67 days, HR 2.10, P = .032).

CONCLUSION

Longer TS-RT was associated with lower overall survival in HPV negative patients. Treatment delay was not associated with survival in HPV positive OPSCC according to multivariate analysis. These findings enhance knowledge about treatment delay effects in OPSCC, aiding providers in decisions and patient communication.

Patterns and Trends in Adjuvant Therapy for Major Salivary Gland Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate adjuvant therapy indications, utilization, and associated survival disparities in major salivary gland cancer (MSGC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The 2006 to 2017 National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients with surgically resected MSGC were included (N = 11,398). pT3-4 classification, pN2-3 classification, lymphovascular invasion, pathologic extranodal extension (pENE), and positive surgical margin (PSM) were considered indications for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT). pENE and PSM were considered possible indications for adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were implemented.

RESULTS

Among 6694 patients with≥ $\ge $ 1 indication for aRT, 1906 (28.5%) received no further treatment and missed aRT. Age, race, comorbidity status, facility type, and distance to reporting facility were associated with missed aRT (P < .025). Among 4003 patients with ≥1 possible indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT), 914 (22.8%) received aCRT. Patients with pENE only (38.5%) and both pENE and PSM (44.0%) received aCRT more frequently than those with PSM only (17.0%) (P < .001). Academic facility was associated with aCRT utilization (P < .05). aCRT utilization increased between 2006 and 2017 in both academic (14.8% vs 23.9%) and nonacademic (8.8% vs 13.5%) facilities (P < .05). Among 2691 patients with ≥1 indication for aRT alone, missed aRT portended poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-2.03, P < .001). Among 4003 patients with ≥1 possible indication for aCRT, aRT alone (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.18, P = .780) and aCRT were associated with similar OS.

CONCLUSION

Missed aRT in MSGC occurs frequently and portends poorer OS. Further studies clarifying indications for aCRT are required.

Neighborhood-Level Disadvantage and Delayed Adjuvant Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Importance

For patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines and the Commission on Cancer. Although individual-level measures of socioeconomic status are associated with receipt of timely, guideline-adherent PORT, the role of neighborhood-level disadvantage has not been examined.

Objective

To characterize the association of neighborhood-level disadvantage with delays in receiving PORT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included 681 adult patients with HNSCC undergoing curative-intent surgery and PORT from 2018 to 2020 at 4 US academic medical centers. The data were analyzed between June 21, 2023, and March 5, 2024.

Main Outcome Measures and Measures

The primary outcome was delay in initiating guideline-adherent PORT (ie, >6 weeks after surgery). Time-to-PORT (TTP) was a secondary outcome. Census block-level Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were calculated and reported as national percentiles (0-100); higher scores indicate greater deprivation. The association of ADI scores with PORT delay was assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic, clinical, and institutional characteristics. PORT initiation across ADI score population quartiles was evaluated with cumulative incidence plots and Cox models.

Results

Among 681 patients with HNSCC undergoing surgery and PORT (mean [SD] age, 61.5 [11.2] years; 487 [71.5%] men, 194 [29.5%] women) the PORT delay rate was 60.8% (414/681) and median (IQR) TTP was 46 (40-56) days. The median (IQR) ADI score was 62.0 (44.0-83.0). Each 25-point increase in ADI score was associated with a corresponding 32% increase in the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of PORT delay (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63) on multivariable regression adjusted for institution, age, race and ethnicity, insurance, comorbidity, cancer subsite, stage, postoperative complications, care fragmentation, travel distance, and rurality. Increasing ADI score population quartiles were associated with increasing TTP (hazard ratio of PORT initiation, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77; and 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; for ADI quartiles 2, 3, and 4 vs ADI quartile 1, respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

Increasing neighborhood-level disadvantage was independently associated with a greater likelihood of PORT delay and longer TTP in a dose-dependent manner. These findings indicate a critical need for the development of multilevel strategies to improve the equitable delivery of timely, guideline-adherent PORT.

Implications of Malignancy, Radiation, and Timing of Major Nasal Reconstruction

Owing to the complex, multilayered anatomy of the nose in the central face, major nasal reconstruction can pose a significant challenge for reconstructive surgeons. It is the responsibility of reconstructive surgeons to have an understanding of the most common cutaneous malignancies and excisional techniques that may lead to complex nasal defects. The purpose of this article is to discuss these malignancies, excisional techniques, and impacts of radiation on tissue that has implications for reconstructive surgeons.

Clinical predictors of premature radiotherapy terminations in senior adults with oral cavity and laryngeal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The underlying factors that contribute to early radiotherapy (RT) termination are understudied, especially in the era of hypofractionated treatment regimens. In this retrospective investigation, we examined the characteristics and causes of premature RT terminations in senior adults (>70 years old) with oral cavity (OC) and laryngeal carcinomas.

METHODS

Hundred and eighty-eight patients treated with RT ± systemic therapy for OC and laryngeal cancer from 2017 to 2022 were identified. Premature termination was defined as completion of less than 95% of the prescribed RT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors predictive of premature termination, and survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (10.6%) experienced premature RT terminations. On regression analysis, ECOG score at initiation of RT was the only covariate studied to be independently associated with premature termination (OR 2.00, 95%CI: [1.21, 3.30], p = 0.007). Three-year overall survival (49.1% vs. 77.3%) was significantly reduced in the termination cohort (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrated over 1 in 10 patients had premature RT termination, which prognosticated inferior survival outcomes. Poor performance status may highlight patients at risk for premature termination and thus identify good candidates for hypofractionated protocols.

Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT.

DATA SOURCES

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.

Timely delivery of PORT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a county hospital

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare the rate of post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) initiation within 6 weeks for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated at a safety net, academic institutio between 2019 and 2021 versus those treated in 2022 after implementation of a new clinical pathway.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was performed at a single tertiary care, safety-net, academic institution. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, dates of surgery, and other treatment dates were collected from the electronic medical record. The time from surgery to PORT was calculated. Patients who started radiation treatment within 42 days of surgery were regarded as having started PORT on time. The demographics, tumor characteristics, and rate of timely PORT for the two cohorts of patients were compared.

Results

From 2018 to 2021, our rate of PORT initiation within 6 weeks of surgery was 12% (n = 57). In 2022, our rate of timely PORT was 88% (n = 16), p < 0.5. Patient demographics and characteristics were similar with the exception of marital status and use of free-flap reconstruction. The 2022 cohort was more likely to be single (p < 0.5), and all patients underwent free-flap reconstruction in 2022 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early referrals, frequent communication, and use of a secure registry were the key to the success found by our group despite the socioeconomic challenges of our underserved, safety-net hospital patient population. The changes made at our institution should serve as a template for other institutions seeking to improve the quality of care for their HNSCC patients.

Trends in Response Rate to US News & World Report Best Hospitals Reputation Survey, 2015 to 2023

Reputation score has been shown to be the strongest predictor of ranking in the US News & World Reports (USNWR) Best Hospitals report. However, the extent to which physicians participate in the underlying USNWR reputation survey is not well-characterized. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of USNWR public methodology reports from 2015 to 2023 to characterize trends in physician response rates by specialty, region, and Doximity membership. Overall response rates declined between 2015 (24.0%) and 2023 (8.9%). In 2023, rates ranged from 4.7% (psychiatry) to 13.9% (otolaryngology). Otolaryngology had the highest response rate among all specialties between 2017 and 2023. Within otolaryngology, both response rates (25.0% to 13.9%) and count (2106 to 1724 physicians) declined between 2015 and 2023. Among Doximity members, response rates were consistently higher for otolaryngologists in the Northeast and Midwest compared to other regions. Though hospital rankings often influence where patients seek care, our findings suggest USNWR reputation scores may not be reliable or representative.

Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC.

RESULTS

Of the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.

Improving Quality and Value in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Multiple advances in surgical techniques, technology, and perioperative patient care have revolutionized head and neck reconstruction over the last 40 years. Concurrent with these advances, health systems, patients, and payers have become increasingly focused on value and quality, owing in part to rapidly increasing health care costs. However, there is no consensus on how to define value and quality in the realm of head and neck reconstruction. This review focuses on the past, present, and future of quality improvement efforts in head and neck reconstruction.

Operationalizing a Free Flap Program for Head and Neck Reconstruction at a Veterans Affairs Hospital

Objectives

We aimed to operationalize a head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT) program at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital with the emphasis on initiating radiotherapy within 6 weeks of surgery for cancer patients and minimizing readmissions.

Study Design

Case series.

Setting

Tertiary care VA hospital.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive head and neck MVFTT patients from May 1, 2017 and April 30, 2022. Demographics, patient and disease characteristics, per-operative data and postoperative outcomes were recorded from the electronic medical record. We sought to compare our rate of 30-day readmissions with those published in the literature.

Results

One hundred and forty-one procedures were performed in the queried timeframe. Eighty-four percent (119) were performed after oncologic resections and 16% (22) were for nononcologic procedures. The rate of total flap loss was <1% and the rate of partial flap loss was 3.5%. For mucosal defects, the fistula rate was 2.3%. The rate of return to the OR for any reason within 30 days was 7.8%. The 30-day readmission rate was 6.4% while the rates reported in the literature range from 13% to 20%. One hundred and four patients required postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and 76% started PORT within 42 days of surgery.

Conclusion

Operationalizing a head and neck MVFTT program with a VA hospital is safe and allows for the successful delivery of multimodality treatment to cancer patients. These resources can be expanded for the care of head and neck cancer treatment sequelae, such as osteoradionecrosis, and other nononcologic patient needs.

Update on adherence to guidelines for time to initiation of postoperative radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A prior study reported that over half of patients with HNSCC initiated PORT after 6 weeks from surgery during 2006-2014. In 2022, the CoC released a quality metric for patients to initiate PORT within 6 weeks. This study provides an update on time to PORT in recent years.

METHODS

The NCDB and TriNetX Research Network were queried to identify patients with HNSCC who received PORT during 2015-2019 and 2015-2021, respectively. Treatment delay was defined as initiating PORT beyond 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

In NCDB, PORT was delayed for 62% of patients. Predictors of delay included age >50, female sex, black race, nonprivate insurance/uninsured status, lower education, oral cavity site, negative surgical margins, increased postoperative length of stay, unplanned hospital readmissions, IMRT radiation modality, treatment at an academic hospital or in the Northeast, and surgery and radiation at different facilities. In TriNetX, 64% experienced treatment delay. Additional associations with prolonged time to treatment included never married/divorced/widowed marital status, major surgery (neck dissection/free flaps/laryngectomy), and gastrostomy/tracheostomy dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

There continue to be challenges to timely initiation of PORT.

Going Off Guidelines: An NCDB Analysis of Missed Adjuvant Therapy Among Surgically Treated Oral Cavity Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Patient factors associated with failure to receive adjuvant therapy after oral cavity cancer resection remain understudied. Here, we identified rates of missed adjuvant therapy, determined factors associated with missed therapy, and assessed associations with survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and known adjuvant therapy status were included. T3-4 stage, N2-3 stage, and lymphovascular invasion were considered indications for adjuvant radiation. Extranodal extension or positive margins were considered indications for chemoradiation. Patient factors were examined for associations with missed adjuvant therapy. Overall survival was evaluated by Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 53,503 patients were included. 27.5% missed adjuvant therapy altogether, and 26.7% with a documented indication for chemoradiation missed chemotherapy. Factors associated with missed adjuvant therapy were age, white race, low income, metropolitan population, increasing comorbidities, travel distance, lip primary, and treatment at the academic facility. Factors associated with missed chemotherapy were age, female sex, nontongue subsite, and treatment at a nonacademic center. Among patients with indications for adjuvant radiation, missed radiation was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-1.53). Among patients with indications for adjuvant chemoradiation, missed chemotherapy was associated with worse overall survival (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09-1.29).

CONCLUSION

Missed adjuvant therapy occurs frequently after oral cavity resection. Patients treated at academic centers may be at risk of missed therapy related to travel distance, though these patients are more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated. Missed adjuvant therapy is associated with worse survival.