Treatment Delay and HPV Status on OPSCC With Upfront Surgery: Analysis of National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effect of treatment delay on survival in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients undergoing primary surgical resection.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the 2010-2017 National Cancer Database.

SETTING

Multicenter database study.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old with OPSCC and known HPV status, treated surgically with or without postoperative radiation/chemotherapy were included. Two cohorts based on HPV status were grouped by time to treatment initiation (TD-TI, ≤30, 31-60, ≥61 days) and surgery to radiotherapy (TS-RT, ≤42, 43-66, ≥67 days). Univariate, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariate analyses assessed correlations between demographic and clinical factors with overall survival in treatment delay groups.

RESULTS

Included were 1643 HPV-positive OPSCC patients and 391 HPV-negative OPSCC patients. No associations between survival and gender, age, race, insurance, or radiotherapy length were observed. Regardless of HPV status, larger tumor size (>2 cm) and lymphovascular invasion predicted worse survival. HPV negative patients with >4 lymph nodes involved had 2.5× greater mortality risk (P = .039). Robotic surgery was associated with improved survival only in HPV positive patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, P < .001). In HPV positive patients, higher TD-TI related to lower mean survival, although this was not significant on multivariate analysis. HPV negative patients with >42 days of TS-RT had decreased survival (43-66 days, HR 1.63, P = .049; ≥67 days, HR 2.10, P = .032).

CONCLUSION

Longer TS-RT was associated with lower overall survival in HPV negative patients. Treatment delay was not associated with survival in HPV positive OPSCC according to multivariate analysis. These findings enhance knowledge about treatment delay effects in OPSCC, aiding providers in decisions and patient communication.

A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgeries for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATSs) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (RATSs) have become standard of care for patients needing surgical resection in early stages. The role for neoadjuvant systemic therapy has increased with patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, there has been some equipoise over the intraoperative and overall outcomes for these patients. Here, we review the current data regarding outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgical resection after systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies presenting data on patients with NSCLC that underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by minimally invasive surgery was performed assessing complications, conversion rates, and lymph node yield.

RESULTS

Our search strategy and review of references resulted in 239 publications to screen with 88 full texts assessed and 21 studies included in our final review. VATS had a statistically significant higher lymph node yield in five studies. The reported conversion rates ranged from 0 to 54%. Dense adhesions, bleeding, and difficult anatomy were the most common reported reasons for conversion to open surgeries. The most common complications between both groups were prolonged air leak, arrythmia, and pneumonia. VATS was found to have significantly fewer complications in three papers.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature supports VATS as safe and feasible for patients with NSCLC after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Surgeons should remain prepared to convert to open surgeries in those patients with dense adhesions and bleeding risk.

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Making It Safe and Successful for Obese Patients

Objective

To investigate outcomes and ascertain the safety and efficacy on patients having total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), stratified by body mass index (BMI), focusing on high-BMI patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study that reviewed 2,266 patients with benign gynecologic diagnoses, early cervical, endometrial, and ovarian carcinoma from September 1996 to October 2017. BMI was from 14.5 to 74.2 and were classified as normal or underweight (<24.9); overweight (25.0-29.9); class I obese (>30.0-34.9); class II obese (35-39.9); or class III obese (>40.0). All patients underwent TLH.

Results

Patients' characteristics were similar across all BMI classes except for age, postoperative pathological diagnoses, and whether a cystoscopy was performed. Surgical duration, and estimated blood loss were similar across BMI classes. Overweight and obese class III patients had lower odds of staying >1 day compared to patients of normal BMI (OR = 0.65, P = .015). Obese class II patients had fewer complications compared to normal BMI patients (OR = 0.27, P = .013), but patients from other high BMI categories did not show any difference compared to patients with normal BMI. The rate of unplanned laparotomy was statistically, but not clinically, higher in obese class III patients (1.8% versus .7%, P = 0.011), most often due to large fibroids. The mean reoperation rate was 2.7%, with the lowest rate (.5%) among obese class II patients, and the highest rate (3.9%) among the normal BMI patients.

Conclusion

TLH is feasible and safe for obese women, regardless of BMI. Obesity is not a contraindication to good outcomes from laparoscopic surgery.