Association Between Facility Surgical Volume and Excess Time in the Hospital After Surgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas

Sporadic vestibular schwannoma in a pediatric population: a case series

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics, management, and outcomes of pediatric patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (sVS).

METHODS

This was a case series at a tertiary care center. Patients were identified through a research repository and chart review. Interventions were microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and observation. Outcome measures were tumor control, facial nerve function, and hearing.

RESULTS

Eight patients over 2006-2022 fulfilled inclusion criteria (unilateral VS without genetic or clinical evidence of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2); age ≤ 21) with a mean age of 17 years (14-20). Average greatest tumor length in the internal auditory canal was 9.7 mm (4.0-16.1). Average greatest tumor dimension (4/8 tumors) in the cerebellopontine angle was 19.1 mm (11.3-26.8). Primary treatment was microsurgery in five (62.5%) patients, observation in two (25%), and SRS in one (12.5%). Four (80%) surgical patients had gross total resections, and one (20%) had regrowth post-near total resection and underwent SRS. One observed patient and the primary SRS patient have remained radiographically stable for 3.5 and 7 years, respectively. The other observed patient required surgery for tumor growth after 12 months of observation. Two surgical patients had poor facial nerve outcomes. All post-procedural patients developed anacusis. Mean follow-up was 3 years (0.5-7).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe one of the largest reported cohorts of pediatric sVS in the USA. Diligent exclusion of NF2 is critical. Given the high likelihood of eventually requiring intervention and known adverse effects of SRS, microsurgery remains the preferred treatment. However, observation can be considered in select situations.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Cystic Versus Solid Vestibular Schwannoma in a Multi-institutional Cohort

OBJECTIVE

Cystic vestibular schwannomas (cVSs) have more variable and less favorable clinical outcomes after microsurgical resection compared with solid VS (sVS). This study compares the preoperative presentation and postoperative outcomes between cVS and sVS.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary skull base referral centers.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients who underwent VS resection from 2016 to 2021 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared differences in baseline symptoms and postoperative outcomes between cVS and sVS.

RESULTS

There were a total of 315 patients (64% female; mean age, 54 yrs) and 46 (15%) were cystic. cVS were significantly larger than sVS (maximum diameter, 28 vs. 18 mm, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of dysphagia and dysphonia preoperatively (p < 0.02). cVSs were more likely to undergo translabyrinthine resection (76 vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and have a higher rate of subtotal resection (STR) compared with sVS (30 vs. 13%, p = 0.003). At latest follow-up, fewer cVS achieved good facial nerve (FN) outcome (House-Brackmann [HB] I/II) (80 vs. 90%, p = 0.048). Subanalysis of cVS and sVS matched in tumor size, and surgical approach did not show differences in the rate of STR or FN outcomes (HB I/II, 82 vs. 78%, p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

In this large multi-institutional series, cVSs represent a distinct entity and are characterized by larger tumor size and higher incidence of atypical symptoms. Although cVSs were more likely to undergo STR and portend worse FN outcomes than sVSs, this may be due to their larger tumor size rather than the presence of the cystic component.

Socioeconomic Disparities in the Pursuit of Care at a High-Volume Institution for Surgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

Increased institutional surgical resection case volume for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) has been associated with improved patient outcomes, including reduced risk of prolonged hospital stay and readmission. Socioeconomic disparities in the pursuit of care at these high-volume institutions remain unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort epidemiological study.

SETTING

National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry of over 1,500 facilities in the United States.

PATIENTS

Adult VS patients (age, >18 years) treated surgically.

INTERVENTIONS

High- versus low-volume facilities, defined using a facility case volume threshold of 25 cases per year. A risk-adjusted restricted cubic spline model was previously used to identify this risk threshold beyond which the incremental benefit of increasing case volume began to plateau.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sociodemographic factors, including race, ethnicity, income, insurance status, and rurality. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics, including age, sex, Charlson-Deyo score, and tumor size.

RESULTS

A totoal of 10,048 patients were identified (median [interquartile range] age = 51 [41-60] years, 54% female, 87% Caucasian). Patients with Spanish/Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.96), income below median (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55-0.73]), and Medicare, Medicaid, or other government insurance versus private insurance (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53-0.74) had reduced odds of treatment at a high-volume facility. Further sensitivity analyses in which facility volume was operationalized continuously reinforced direction and significance of these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic disparities exist in the propensity for VS patients to be treated at a high-volume facility. Further work is needed to understand the nature of these associations and whether interventions can be designed to mitigate them.