Effects of Freshly Irradiated vs Irradiated and Stored Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

RBC transfusion and necrotizing enterocolitis in very preterm infants: a multicenter observational study

The causal relationship between Packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains uncertain. This study aims to provide an exploration of transfusion and NEC in very preterm infants. Using data from the Chinese Neonatal Network cohort study between 2019 and 2021, the analysis focused on very preterm infants (with a birth weight of < 1500 g or a gestational age of < 32 weeks) who developed NEC after receiving transfusions. The time interval between the prior transfusion and NEC was analyzed. An uneven distribution of the time interval implies an association of transfusion and NEC. Additionally, multivariable logistic analysis was conducted to detect the prognosis of defined transfusion-associated NEC(TANEC). Of the 16,494 infants received RBC transfusions, NEC was noted in 1281 (7.7%) cases, including 409 occurred after transfusion. Notably, 36.4% (149/409) of post-transfusion NEC occurred within 2 days after transfusion. The time interval distribution showed a non-normal pattern (Shapiro-Wilk test, W = 0.513, P < 0.001), indicating a possible link between transfusion and NEC. TANEC was defined as NEC occurred within 2 days after transfusion. Infants with TANEC had a higher incidence of death (adjusted OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.64), severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (adjusted OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.41 to 2.91) and late-onset sepsis (adjusted OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.09) compared with infants without NEC after transfusion. Unevenly high number of NEC cases after RBC transfusions implies transfusion is associated with NEC. TANEC is associated with a poor prognosis. Further research is warranted to enhance our understanding of TANEC.

Thresholds for Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Preterm Infants: Evidence to Practice

Rapid blood loss with circulatory shock is dangerous for the preterm infant as cardiac output and oxygen-carrying capacity are simultaneously imperilled. This requires prompt restoration of circulating blood volume with emergency transfusion. It is recommended that clinicians use both clinical and laboratory responses to guide transfusion requirements in this situation. For preterm infants with anemia of prematurity, it is recommended that clinicians use a restrictive algorithm from one of two recently published clinical trials. Transfusion outside these algorithms in very preterm infants is not evidence-based and is actively discouraged.

Neonatal Blood Banking Practices

There is little formal guidance to direct neonatal blood banking practices and, as a result, practices vary widely across institutions. In this vulnerable patient population with a high transfusion burden, considerations for blood product selection include freshness, extended-storage media, pathogen inactivation, and other modifications. The authors discuss the potential unintended adverse impacts in the neonatal recipient. Concerns such as immunodeficiency, donor exposures, cytomegalovirus transmission, volume overload, transfusion-associated hyperkalemia, and passive hemolysis from ABO incompatibility have driven modifications of blood components to improve safety.

New frontiers in neonatal red blood cell transfusion research

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are common in neonates requiring intensive care. Recent studies have compared restricted versus liberal transfusion guidelines, but limitations exist on evaluations of outcomes in populations that never required a transfusion compared to those receiving any transfusion. Although there are well-established risks associated with RBC transfusions, new data has emerged that suggests additional clinically relevant associations, including adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, donor sex differences, and inflammation or immunosuppression. Further research is needed to delineate the magnitude of these risks and to further improve the safety of transfusions. The goal of this review is to highlight underappreciated, yet clinically important risks associated with neonatal RBC transfusions and to introduce several areas in which neonates may uniquely benefit from alterations in practice.

Optimizing RBC Transfusion Outcomes in Patients with Acute Illness and in the Chronic Transfusion Setting

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common clinical intervention used to treat patients with acute and chronic anemia. The decision to transfuse RBCs in the acute setting is based on several factors but current clinical studies informing optimal RBC transfusion decision making (TDM) are largely based upon hemoglobin (Hb) level. In contrast to transfusion in acute settings, chronic RBC transfusion therapy has several different purposes and is associated with distinct transfusion risks such as iron overload and RBC alloimmunization. Consequently, RBC TDM in the chronic setting requires optimizing the survival of transfused RBCs in order to reduce transfusion exposure over the lifespan of an individual and the associated transfusion complications mentioned. This review summarizes the current medical literature addressing optimal RBC-TDM in the acute and chronic transfusion settings and discusses the current gaps in knowledge which need to be prioritized in future national and international research initiatives.

Current advances in 2022: A critical review of selected topics by the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee

BACKGROUND

The Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee (CTMC) composes a summary of new and important advances in transfusion medicine (TM) on an annual basis. Since 2018, this has been assembled into a manuscript and published in Transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

CTMC members selected original manuscripts relevant to TM that were published electronically and/or in print during calendar year 2022. Papers were selected based on perceived importance and/or originality. References for selected papers were made available to CTMC members to provide feedback. Members were also encouraged to identify papers that may have been omitted initially. They then worked in groups of two to three to write a summary for each new publication within their broader topic. Each topic summary was then reviewed and edited by two separate committee members. The final manuscript was assembled by the first and senior authors. While this review is extensive, it is not a systematic review and some publications considered important by readers may have been excluded.

RESULTS

For calendar year 2022, summaries of key publications were assembled for the following broader topics within TM: blood component therapy; infectious diseases, blood donor testing, and collections; patient blood management; immunohematology and genomics; hemostasis; hemoglobinopathies; apheresis and cell therapy; pediatrics; and health care disparities, diversity, equity, and inclusion.

DISCUSSION

This Committee Report reviews and summarizes important publications and advances in TM published during calendar year 2022, and maybe a useful educational tool.

Comparative efficacy and safety of restrictive versus liberal transfusion thresholds in anemic preterm infants: a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials

The comparative efficacy and safety of restrictive with liberal transfusion thresholds remain controversial in anemic preterm infants. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two transfusion thresholds for anemic preterm infants. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing restrictive with liberal transfusion thresholds in anemic preterm infants through April 30, 2022. Two independent investigators screened literature, extracted data, and appraised the methodological quality of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan version 5.3.5. Twelve RCTs with 4380 preterm infants were included. Liberal transfusion threshold significantly increased the level of hemoglobin after transfusion (mean difference (MD): -10.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): -15.98 to -4.08; p=0.001; I2=94%) and hematocrit (MD: -3.62; 95%CI: -6.78 to -0.46; p=0.02; I2=80%) compared with restrictive transfusion. Infants' age at first transfusion in restrictive transfusion group was higher than that of infants in liberal transfusion group (MD: 5.08; 95%CI: 2.27 to7.89; p=0.004; I2=54%); however, restrictive transfusion was associated with more time on supplemental oxygen (MD: 3.56; 95%CI: 1.93 to 5.18; p<0.001; I2=62%) and ventilator or CPAP (MD: 3.31; 95%CI: 1.42 to 5.20; p=0.006; I2=75%). For the remaining outcomes, two transfusion strategies were comparable. Furthermore, a series of sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the level of hemoglobin after transfusion, age at first transfusion, time on ventilator or CPAP, and safety outcomes. Evidence with substantial heterogeneity indicates that liberal and restrictive transfusion thresholds are effective and safe blood cell transfusion strategies in anemic preterm infants, but the liberal strategy may be more effective in shortening the length of necessary respiratory support.

Frühgeborene: Haben frisch bestrahlte Erythrozytenkonzentrate Vorteile?

Nahezu alle extrem unreifen Frühgeborenen leiden an einer chronischen Anämie. Um die Sauerstoffversorgung der sich entwickelnden Organe zu gewährleisten, benötigen sie mehrfach leukozytenreduzierte Erythrozytenkonzentrate. Diese werden zur Vermeidung der transfusionsassoziierten Graft-Versus-Host-Erkrankung üblicherweise bestrahlt. Inwiefern beeinflusst der Bestrahlungszeitpunkt die Sauerstofftransportkapazität der Erythrozyten?