Management of Severe Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy

Prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula based on multi-sequence MR imaging

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of conventional MRI sequences in predicting the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A total of 122 patients from August 2019 to April 2023 were enrolled. All patients underwent pancreatic histological evaluation, including fibrosis, fat deposition, and acinar cell atrophy. The preoperative image features of pancreas were obtained, including morphological features, pancreas-muscle signal intensity ratio, pancreatic fat fraction and multi-phase enhancement features. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether pancreatic fistula occurred after operation. The related risk factors of pancreatic fistula, the correlation between imaging and pathological changes were analyzed, and the value of preoperative imaging in predicting pancreatic fistula was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 122 patients, 23(18.9 %) developed POPF. Pathological score showed that there was a significant difference in pancreatic fat deposition between the two groups (P = 0.006), the fat deposition score was higher in the POPF group. Pancreatic fat deposition was the only independent risk factor for POPF(OR,1.933; P = 0.018). MRI showed that proton density fat fraction(PDFF) (P = 0.001), pancreas-to-aorta signal intensity ratio(P-A SI ratio) of equilibrium phase(P = 0.023) and delay phase(P = 0.020) had significant differences. PDFF was positively correlated with fat deposition(r = 0.404, P < 0.001), P-A SI ratio of equilibrium phase and delay phase were positively correlated with fibrosis(r = 0.313, P = 0.002; r = 0.315, P = 0.002, respectively). ROC analysis showed that PDFF had the best efficacy in predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula (AUROC = 0.810), better than P-A SI ratio of equilibrium phase(AUROC = 0.752) and delayed phase(AUROC = 0.766).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic fat deposition is a high risk factor for POPF, PDFF can reflect fat deposition and predict POPF.

Effects of Pancreatic Fistula After Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy

Importance

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) are the biggest contributor to surgical morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. The impact of POPF could be influenced by the surgical approach.

Objective

To assess the clinical impact of POPF in patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was conducted from 2007 to 2020 in 36 referral centers in Europe, South America, and Asia. Participants were patients with POPF (grade B/C as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery [ISGPS]) after MIPD and OPD (MIPD-POPF, OPD-POPF). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio based on the variables age (continuous), sex, body mass index (continuous), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (dichotomous), vascular involvement, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor size, malignancy, and POPF grade C. Data analysis was performed from July to October 2023.

Exposure

MIPD and OPD.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the presence of a second clinically relevant (ISGPS grade B/C) complication (postpancreatic hemorrhage [PPH], delayed gastric emptying [DGE], bile leak, and chyle leak) besides POPF.

Results

Overall, 1130 patients with POPF were included (558 MIPD and 572 OPD), of whom 336 patients after MIPD were matched to 336 patients after OPD. The median (IQR) age was 65 (58-73) years; there were 703 males (62.2%) and 427 females (37.8%). Among patients who had MIPD-POPF, 129 patients (55%) experienced a second complication compared with 95 patients (36%) with OPD-POPF (P < .001). The rate of PPH was higher with MIPD-POPF (71 patients [21%] vs 22 patients [8.0%]; P < .001), without significant differences for DGE (65 patients [19%] vs 45 patients [16%]; P = .40), bile leak (43 patients [13%] vs 52 patients [19%]; P = .06), and chyle leak (1 patient [0.5%] vs 5 patients [1.9%]; P = .39). MIPD-POPF was associated with a longer hospital stay (median [IQR], 27 [18-38] days vs 22 [15-30] days; P < .001) and more reoperations (67 patients [21%] vs 21 patients [7%]; P < .001) but comparable in-hospital/30-day mortality (25 patients [7%] vs 7 patients [5%]; P = .31) with OPD-POPF, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that for patients after MIPD, the presence of POPF is more frequently associated with other clinically relevant complications compared with OPD. This underscores the importance of perioperative mitigation strategies for POPF and the resulting PPH in high-risk patients.

Fluorescence-guided pancreatic surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Although fluorescence guidance during various surgical procedures has been shown to be safe and have possible better clinical outcomes than without the guidance, the use of fluorophores in pancreatic surgery is novel and not yet well described. This scoping review involved a systematic methodology of the currently available literature and aimed to illuminate the use of fluorophores in pancreatic surgery from a clinical view.

METHODS

The PRISMA and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used when appropriate and the following databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, The Cochrane Collection, and Web of Science. Human original articles and case reports were included. Bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the IDEAL framework was used for evaluation of surgical innovation.

RESULTS

A total of 5,565 search hits were screened, and 23 original articles and 24 case reports consisting of 754 patients met the inclusion criteria. The use of indocyanine green was both the most prominent and the most promising method for securing sufficient perfusion of neighboring organs, enhancing the detection and distinguishing of neuroendocrine tumors, and assisting in the identification of hepatic micrometastases.

CONCLUSION

The included studies were generally heterogenic, exploratory, and small. Indocyanine green was used in several ways, and it may add clinical value in different settings during pancreatic surgery. Tumor-targeted probes are a rapidly developing and promising field of research.

Reoperation for pancreatic fistula: a systematic review of completion pancreatectomy vs. pancreas-preserving-procedures and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Consensus on the nomenclature and indications for reoperation for post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is lacking. This study explores the available literature to classify the different types of reoperations and report outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed, including articles from 2010 to 2024 reporting reoperations for POPF after PD. The primary outcome was 30- or 90-day-mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperation date, additional relaparotomy, ICU-admission, hospital stay, rate of pancreatic-exocrine-insufficiency, diabetes and long-term survivors.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were reviewed with 766 patients reoperated for POPF after PD, 283 (37 %) undergoing completion pancreatectomy (CP) and 483 (63 %) pancreas-preserving-procedures (PPPs). Among PPPs, drainage (30 %), wirsungostomy (14 %), pancreatic anastomosis repair (6 %), "sinking" of pancreatic stump (6 %) and re-do pancreatic anastomosis (4 %) were identified. The main indications for reoperation were post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, necrotizing acute pancreatitis, sepsis and peritonitis. PPPs were preferred with severe hemodynamic instability. Mortality rates after CP and PPPs ranged from 20 to 56 % and 0-67 %, respectively. Early reoperation was associated with reduced ICU-recovery after "sinking" (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Reoperation for POPF after PD is rarely needed. When it is, early timing seems critical for better outcomes, and PPPs seems to be the best bail out option in patients with severe hemodynamic instability.

Preoperative body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis can predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgery. The methods for predicting pancreatic fistula are limited. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of body composition parameters measured by preoperative bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) on the development of POPF.

METHODS

A total of 168 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic surgery from March 2022 to December 2022 at our institution were included in the study and randomly assigned at a 3:2 ratio to the training group and the validation group. All data, including previously reported risk factors for POPF and parameters measured by BIA, were collected. Risk factors were analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A prediction model was established to predict the development of POPF based on these parameters.

RESULTS

POPF occurred in 41 of 168 (24.4%) patients. In the training group of 101 enrolled patients, visceral fat area (VFA) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.077, P = 0.001) and fat mass index (FMI) (OR = 0.628, P = 0.027) were found to be independently associated with POPF according to multivariable analysis. A prediction model including VFA and FMI was established to predict the development of POPF with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.753. The efficacy of the prediction model was also confirmed in the internal validation group (AUC 0.785, 95% CI 0.659-0.911).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative assessment of body fat distribution by BIA can predict the risk of POPF after pancreatic surgery.

Endovascular Management of a Portal Vein Pseudoaneurysm following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Introduction

Portal vein pseudoaneurysm is a rare but potential life-threatening complication following pancreatoduodenectomy. We herein report on the successful, minimally invasive treatment of this serious complication.

Case Presentation

A 68-year-old male patient who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein wedge resection at another facility presented to our department due to persistent bile leakage and intermittent bleeding. Abdominal computed tomography scanning demonstrated a large fluid collection surrounding the pancreatojejunostomy, with an occlusion of the common hepatic artery as well as a portal vein pseudoaneurysm. Treatment was performed by means of a minimally invasive approach, including endovascular portal vein stent placement and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) through the dehiscent hepaticojejunostomy. This was followed by the placement of a percutaneous pigtail in the peripancreatic fluid collection for adequate drainage. Antibiotics were administered for a total duration of 6 weeks following stent placement. In the subsequent weeks, the PTBD could be internalized and the pigtail removed, after which patient was discharged. During outpatient visits, a contrast injection through the PTBD confirmed the absence of bile leakage, after which the drain could be removed.

Conclusion

This article presents one of the few published cases of portal vein pseudoaneurysm following pancreatoduodenectomy and underscores the vital role of minimally invasive endovascular stent and PTBD placement in managing this rare and potentially lethal complication.

An improvement of pancreaticojejunostomy: double-row and six-suture method pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy

With the rapid development of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) surgery, the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and surgical complications has been greatly reduced. The occurrence of POPF is closely related to the quality of the pancreatic reconstruction. Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) remains a significant technical challenge, and no PJ has yet been widely recognized. From January 2021 to December 2023, 72 patients underwent PD with double-row and six-suture PJ. The clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of these patients were analysed. The median operation time was 240 min (180-540 min). The median intraoperative blood loss was 200 ml (50-600 mL). The postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (8-27 days). Eleven patients (15.3%) had a biochemical fistula and five patients (6.9%) had a grade B POPF. No patient had a grade C POPF or died within 90 days after surgery. Double-row and six-suture PJ is a safe and acceptable PJ.

Approach to postpancreatectomy care Impacts outcomes: Retrospective Validation of the PORSCH trial

BACKGROUND

In the recent PORSCH trial, a three-part postpancreatectomy care algorithm was employed with a near 50 ​% reduction in mortality. We hypothesized that clinical care congruent with this protocol would correlate with better outcomes in our patients.

METHODS

Real-world postoperative care was compared to the pathway described by the PORSCH trial and patients were assigned into groups based on congruence with its recommendations. The primary composite outcome (PCO) consisted of 90-day mortality, organ failure, and interventions for bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 289 patients, care of 12 ​% was entirely congruent with the PORSCH algorithm. The PCO was recorded in 9 ​% of the PORSCH care group, 8 ​% of the Partial-PORSCH care group, and 19 ​% of the Non-PORSCH care group (p ​= ​0.044). Adverse outcomes were highest when pancreaticoduodenectomy patients received care incongruent with the algorithm's CT imaging recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These results add external validity to the principles of clinical care underlying the PORSCH algorithm.

Late cholangitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A common complication with or without anatomical biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Postoperative cholangitis is a common complication after pancreatoduodenectomy that can occur with or without anatomical biliary obstruction. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and risk factors of cholangitis after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in 2 Dutch tertiary pancreatic centers (2010-2019). Primary outcome was postoperative cholangitis, defined as systemic inflammation with abnormal liver tests without another focus of infection, at least 1 month after resection. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies were evaluated. Two types of postoperative cholangitis were distinguished; obstructive cholangitis (benign stenosis of the hepaticojejunostomy) and nonobstructive cholangitis. Potential risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Postoperative cholangitis occurred in 93 of 900 patients (10.3%). Median time to first episode of cholangitis was 8 months (interquartile range 4-16) after pancreatoduodenectomy. Multiple episodes of cholangitis occurred in 44 patients (47.3%) and readmission was necessary in 83 patients (89.2%). No cholangitis-related mortality was observed. Obstructive cholangitis was seen in 37 patients (39.8%) and nonobstructive cholangitis in 56 patients (60.2%). Surgery was performed for cholangitis in 7 patients (7.5%) and consisted of revision of the hepaticojejunostomy or elongation of the biliary limb. Postoperative biliary leakage (odds ratio 2.56; 95% confidence interval 1.42-4.62; P = .0018) was independently associated with postoperative cholangitis.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative cholangitis unrelated to cancer recurrence was seen in 10% of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy. Nonobstructive cholangitis was more common than obstructive cholangitis. Postoperative biliary leakage was an independent risk factor.

Stent A pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: Is it always necessary?

The establishment of a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is considered the most common and, concomitantly, the most serious complication associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The search for either technical modifications of the operative technique or pharmaceutical interventions that could possibly aid in decreasing the incidence of this often-devastating complication appears justified. The stenting of the pancreatic duct, with the use of either internal or external stents, has been evaluated in this direction. In theory, it is an approach that could eliminate many pathophysiological factors responsible for the occurrence of a POPF. The purpose of the present study was to review the current data regarding the role of pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of POPF, after PD, by using PubMed and Reference Citation Analysis. In general, previous studies seem to highlight the superiority of external stents over their internal counterparts in regard to the incidence of POPF; this is at the cost, however, of increased morbidity associated mainly with the stent removal. Certainly, the use of an internal stent is a less invasive approach with acceptable results and is definitely deprived of the drawbacks arising through the complete diversion of pancreatic juice from the gastrointestinal tract. Bearing in mind the scarcity of high-quality data on the subject, an approach of reserving stent placement for the high-risk for POPF patients and individualizing the selection between the use of an internal or an external stent according to the distinct characteristics of each individual case scenario appears appropriate.

Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Using Open Drainage and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Times

Introduction Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) that may cause lethal complications. Therefore, it is important to properly treat POPF and prevent its aggravation during the postoperative management of PD. We have used a combination of open drainage, in which the wound above the fluid collection is opened, and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) to manage POPF after PD. To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this combination treatment, we analyzed the outcomes of patients with POPF after PD. Methods Patients who underwent PD were reviewed and those who developed POPF were extracted and divided into three groups according to the management of POPF: N group (patients treated with open drainage and NPWTi-d), O group (patients treated with open drainage without NPWTi-d), and C group (patients treated with catheter drainage). The perioperative outcomes were compared among the three groups. Results During the study period, 133 patients underwent PD, out of which 39 (29%) developed POPF (≥grade B). Among the 39 patients with POPF, eight, four, and 27 were classified into the N, O, and C group, respectively. No mortality was observed in the patients with POPF. No severe complications were observed in the patients who underwent open drainage (N and O groups), while two patients in the C group developed severe complications. Among the patients who underwent open drainage, the N group tended to have a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the O group. Conclusions The current study suggests that open drainage safely and effectively healed POPF and NPWTi-d promoted wound closure. The combination of open drainage and NPWTi-d may prevent the aggravation of POPF, reduce failure to rescue, and shorten hospital stay after PD.

Surgical complications requiring late surgical revisions after pancreatoduodenectomy increase postoperative morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomies are complex surgical procedures with considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Here, we describe complications and outcomes in patients requiring surgical revisions following pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

A total of 1048 patients undergoing a pancreatoduodenectomy at our institution between 2002 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients with surgical revisions were included. Revisions were divided into early and late using a cut-off of 5 days after the first surgery. Statistical significance was examined by using chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients with at least 1 surgical revision after pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Notably, 64 patients had a revision during the first 5 days and were classified as early revision. Compared with the 86 patients with late revisions, we found no differences concerning wound infections, delayed gastric emptying, or acute kidney failure. After late revisions, we found significantly more cases of sepsis (31.4% late versus 15.6% early, p = 0.020) and reintubation due to respiratory failure (33.7% versus 18.8%, p = 0.031). Postoperative mortality was significantly higher within the late revision group (23.2% versus 9.4%, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

Arising complications after pancreatoduodenectomy should be addressed as early as possible as patients requiring late surgical revisions frequently developed septic complications and multiorgan failure.

Completion pancreatectomy during pancreatoduodenectomy: A lifesaving solution in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is responsible of most major complications and fatalities after PD. By avoiding POPF, TP may improve operative outcomes in high-risk patients. The aim was to compare total pancreatectomy (TP) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in high-risk patients and evaluate results of implementing a risk-tailored strategy in clinical practice.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2023, 139 patients (76 men, median age 67 years) underwent resection of disease located in the head of the pancreas. Starting January 1, 2022, we offered TP to patients at high POPF risks (fistula risk score (FRS) ≥7) and to patients with intermediate POPF risks (FRS: 3-6) and high risks of failure to rescue (age> 75 years, ASA score ≥3). We compared outcomes of TP and PD and evaluated the results of the new strategy implementation on operative outcomes. Propensity score-based analysis was performed to limit bias of between-group comparison.

RESULTS

Eventually, 26 (19%) patients underwent TP and 113 (81%) patients underwent PD. Severe complications occurred in 42 (30%) patients and 13 (9%) patients died. TP resulted in shorter lengths of hospital stay (median: 14 days [11; 18] vs. 17 days [13; 24], p = 0.016) and less risks of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) (0% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) compared to PD. Crude and propensity match analysis showed that the implementation of a risk-tailored strategy led to significant reduction of reoperation, POPF, PPH and mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

The use of TP as part of a risk-tailored strategy in high-risk patients can be lifesaving.

Pancreatic duct occlusion with polychloroprene-based glue for the management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy-an outdated approach?

Background

Managing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) presents a formidable challenge after pancreatoduodenectomy. Some centers consider pancreatic duct occlusion (PDO) in reoperations following pancreatoduodenectomy as a pancreas-preserving procedure, aiming to control a severe POPF. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of employing PDO for the management of the pancreatic stump during relaparotomy for POPF subsequent to pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive patients at Oslo University Hospital undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy and PDO during relaparotomy. Pancreatic stump management during relaparotomy consisted of occlusion of the main pancreatic duct with polychloroprene Faxan-Latex, after resecting the dehiscent jejunal loop previously constituting the pancreaticojejunostomy.

Results

Between July 2005 and September 2015, 826 pancreatoduodenectomies were performed. Overall reoperation rate was 13.2% (n = 109). POPF grade B/C developed in 113 (13.7%) patients. PDO during relaparotomy was performed in 17 (2.1%) patients, whereas completion pancreatectomy was performed in 22 (2.7%) patients. Thirteen (76%) of the 17 patients had a persistent POPF after PDO, and the time from PDO until removal of the last abdominal drain was median 35 days. Of the PDO patients, 13 (76%) patients required further drainage procedures (n = 12) or an additional reoperation (n = 1). In-hospital mortality occurred in one patient (5.9%). Five (29%) patients developed new-onset diabetes mellitus, and 16 (94%) patients acquired exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.

Conclusions

PDO is a safe and feasible approach for managing severe POPF during reoperation following pancreatoduodenectomy. A significant proportion of patients experience persistent POPF post-procedure, necessitating supplementary drainage interventions. The findings suggest that it is advisable to explore alternative pancreas-preserving methods before opting for PDO in the management of POPF subsequent to pancreatoduodenectomy.

Deep learning-based prediction of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a life-threatening complication with an unmet need for accurate prediction. This study was aimed to develop preoperative artificial intelligence-based prediction models. Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were enrolled and stratified into model development and validation sets by surgery between 2016 and 2017 or in 2018, respectively. Machine learning models based on clinical and body composition data, and deep learning models based on computed tomographic data, were developed, combined by ensemble voting, and final models were selected comparison with earlier model. Among the 1333 participants (training, n = 881; test, n = 452), postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 421 (47.8%) and 134 (31.8%) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 59 (6.7%) and 27 (6.0%) participants in the training and test datasets, respectively. In the test dataset, the area under the receiver operating curve [AUC (95% confidence interval)] of the selected preoperative model for predicting all and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was 0.75 (0.71-0.80) and 0.68 (0.58-0.78). The ensemble model showed better predictive performance than the individual ML and DL models.

Machine learning models and nomogram based on clinical, laboratory profiles and skeletal muscle index to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

Background

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a perilous complication that may arise subsequent to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In recent times, there has been an escalating interest in employing machine learning (ML) techniques to aid in treatment decision-making. The purpose of this research is to assess the effectiveness of ML in comparison to conventional models, while also conducting an initial evaluation of the predictive capability of skeletal muscle index (SMI) concerning POPF.

Methods

This retrospective observational study was carried out at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2012 to January 2021, encompassing data from 269 patients who underwent PD. After identifying independent factors associated with the condition, a logistic regression model was employed to construct a nomogram, alongside the establishment of five ML models. To assess their effectiveness, the best-performing ML model and nomogram were evaluated on a separate test group comprising 77 additional patients. The evaluation involved comparing the area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score.

Results

Among the 269 patients studied, the incidence of POPF was found to be 56.9%, with 106 patients (69.3%) experiencing clinically-relevant POPF. We identified six independent factors associated with POPF, including body mass index (BMI), SMI, pancreatic duct dilatation, tumor size, triglyceride levels, and the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) on the first postoperative day. When evaluated on the test set, the Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) model, which was the best-performing ML model, achieved an AUC of 0.824 and a Brier score of 0.175. The corresponding performance indicators for the nomogram were 0.844 for AUC and 0.165 for the Brier score.

Conclusions

This study found that there is minimal difference between ML and the nomogram based on logistic regression in predicting POPF. Additionally, SMI shows promise as a potential and practical tool for assessing the risk of POPF.

Nationwide Outcome after Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at very High Risk (ISGPS-D) for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula

OBJECTIVE

To assess nationwide surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients at very high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), categorized as ISGPS-D.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Morbidity and mortality after ISGPS-D PD is perceived so high that a recent randomized trial advocated prophylactic total pancreatectomy (TP) as alternative aiming to lower this risk. However, current outcomes of ISGPS-D PD remain unknown as large nationwide series are lacking.

METHODS

Nationwide retrospective analysis including consecutive patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD (i.e., soft texture and pancreatic duct ≤3 mm), using the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2021). Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C). The use of prophylactic TP to avoid POPF during the study period was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1402 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was 4.1% (n=57), which decreased to 3.7% (n=20/536) in the last 2 years. Major morbidity occurred in 642 patients (45.9%) and POPF in 410 (30.0%), which corresponded with failure to rescue in 8.9% (n=57/642). Patients with POPF had increased rates of major morbidity (88.0% vs. 28.3%; P<0.001) and mortality (6.3% vs. 3.5%; P=0.016), compared to patients without POPF. Among 190 patients undergoing TP, prophylactic TP to prevent POPF was performed in 4 (2.1%).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide series found a 4.1% in-hospital mortality after ISGPS-D PD with 45.9% major morbidity, leaving little room for improvement through prophylactic TP. Nevertheless, given the outcomes in 30% of patients who develop POPF, future randomized trials should aim to prevent and mitigate POPF in this high-risk category.

Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of published fistula risk models by external validation, and to identify independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

BACKGROUND

Multiple risk models have been developed to predict POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. External validation in high-quality prospective cohorts is, however, lacking or only performed for individual models.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of data from the stepped-wedge cluster cluster-randomized Care After Pancreatic Resection According to an Algorithm for Early Detection and Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Fistula versus Current Practice (PORSCH) trial was performed. Included were all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands (January 2018-November 2019). Risk models on POPF were identified by a systematic literature search. Model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) and calibration plots. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with clinically relevant POPF.

RESULTS

Overall, 1358 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 341 patients (25%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Fourteen risk models for POPF were evaluated, with AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.70. The updated alternative fistula risk score had an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.69-0.72). The alternative fistula risk score demonstrated an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.689-0.71), whilst an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.699-0.71) was also found for the model by Petrova and colleagues. Soft pancreatic texture, pathology other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis, small pancreatic duct diameter, higher body mass index, minimally invasive resection and male sex were identified as independent predictors of POPF.

CONCLUSION

Published risk models predicting clinically relevant POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy have a moderate predictive accuracy. Their clinical applicability to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment strategies is therefore questionable.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Total Pancreatectomy as an Alternative to Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at High Risk for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is it a Justifiable Indication?

OBJECTIVE

Examine the potential benefit of total pancreatectomy (TP) as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients at high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

TP is mentioned as an alternative to PD in patients at high risk for POPF, but a systematic review is lacking.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analyses using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published up to October 2022, comparing elective single-stage TP for any indication versus PD in patients at high risk for POPF. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality. Secondary endpoints were major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) on the short-term and quality of life.

RESULTS

After screening 1212 unique records, five studies with 707 patients (334 TP and 373 high-risk PD) met the eligibility criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies. The 90-day mortality after TP and PD did not differ (6.3% vs. 6.2%; RR=1.04 [95%CI 0.56-1.93]). Major morbidity rate was lower after TP compared to PD (26.7% vs. 38.3%; RR=0.65 [95%CI 0.48-0.89]), but no significance was seen in matched/randomized studies (29.0% vs. 36.9%; RR = 0.73 [95%CI 0.48-1.10]). Two studies investigated quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) at a median of 30-52 months, demonstrating comparable global health status after TP and PD (77% [±15] vs. 76% [±20]; P =0.857).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found no reduction in short-term mortality and major morbidity after TP as compared to PD in patients at high risk for POPF. However, if TP is used as a bail-out procedure, the comparable long-term quality of life is reassuring.

Identifying Effective Biomarkers for Accurate Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis Using Statistical Machine Learning

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the lowest survival rates among all major types of cancer. Consequently, it is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Serum biomarkers historically correlate well with the early prognosis of post-surgical complications of PC. However, attempts to identify an effective biomarker panel for the successful prognosis of PC were almost non-existent in the current literature. The current study investigated the roles of various serum biomarkers including carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 8 (CXCL-8), procalcitonin (PCT), and other relevant clinical data for identifying PC progression, classified into sepsis, recurrence, and other post-surgical complications, among PC patients. The most relevant biochemical and clinical markers for PC prognosis were identified using a random-forest-powered feature elimination method. Using this informative biomarker panel, the selected machine-learning (ML) classification models demonstrated highly accurate results for classifying PC patients into three complication groups on independent test data. The superiority of the combined biomarker panel (Max AUC-ROC = 100%) was further established over using CA19-9 features exclusively (Max AUC-ROC = 75%) for the task of classifying PC progression. This novel study demonstrates the effectiveness of the combined biomarker panel in successfully diagnosing PC progression and other relevant complications among Egyptian PC survivors.

Effects of early enteral nutrition on pancreatic fistula and long-term prognosis after distal pancreatectomy or enucleation of pancreatic tumours in a major academic university hospital in China: protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the main complications following pancreatic resection. Despite pancreatic fistula having a low postoperative mortality rate, the readmission and intervention rates in patients with pancreatic fistula are still considerable. Although there are several studies on pancreatic fistula development after pancreaticoduodenectomy, there are only a few studies on the feeding protocols applied after distal pancreatectomy or enucleation of pancreatic tumours. We designed this trial to test the hypothesis that early feeding does not increase the incidence of POPF and positively influences the long-term prognosis in patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy or enucleation of pancreatic tumours.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective randomised controlled trial that will be conducted in a single centre. A total of 106 patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy or enucleation of pancreatic tumours will be recruited after providing informed consent. They will be randomly assigned to either an early or late feeding group. The early feeding group will begin enteral nutrition on postoperative day (POD) 3, and the late feeding group will begin enteral nutrition on POD7. The primary outcome is the incidence of POPF. The secondary outcomes include the length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and indicators of long-term prognosis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee approved the study (M2021395). Findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and in national and/or international meetings to guide future practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100053978.

Completion Pancreatectomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Who Needs It?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify the indications for and report the outcomes of completion pancreatectomy (CPLP) in the postoperative course after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

BACKGROUND

CPLP may be considered or even inevitable for damage control after PD.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing PD between 2001 and 2019 was searched for patients who underwent CPLP in the postoperative course after PD. Baseline characteristics, perioperative details, and outcomes of CPLP patients were analyzed and specific indications for CPLP were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 3953 consecutive patients underwent PD during the observation period. CPLP was performed in 120 patients (3%) after a median of 10 days following PD. The main indications for CPLP included postpancreatectomy acute necrotizing pancreatitis [n=47 (39%)] and postoperative pancreatic fistula complicated by hemorrhage [n=41 (34%)] or associated with uncontrollable leakage of the pancreatoenteric anastomosis [n=23 (19%)]. The overall 90-day mortality rate of all 3953 patients was 3.5% and 37% for patients undergoing CPLP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding that only very few patients (3%) need CPLP suggests that conservative, interventional, and organ-preserving surgical measures are the mainstay of complication management after PD. Postpancreatectomy acute necrotizing pancreatitis, uncontrollable postoperative pancreatic fistula, and fistula-associated hemorrhage are highly dangerous and represent the main indications for CPLP after PD.

Preemptive wirsungostomy: a safe fistula for avoiding a dreadful fistula in elective or planned pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

High-risk pancreatic anastomosis can lead to a high mortality rate after PD due to the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Performing a wirsungostomy by externalizing the pancreatic duct is a poorly known alternative to anastomosis which could reduce the risk of POPF and the associated severe morbidity METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent primary wirsungostomy with PD from January 2007 to December 2021 in our tertiary referral center. Rates of morbidity and mortality with long-term pancreatic functions were studied.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. The median Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) was 52%, with 95% patients in the high-risk ua-FRS category and 88.3% patients with stage D risk of developing POPF according to the classification of the ISGPS. The mortality rate was 3.3%, and overall 90-day postoperative morbidity was 63.7% with 50% of patients developing major complications. Mean follow-up was 29.8 months. Twelve patients (20%) became diabetic and 35 patients (58.3%) had preserved pancreatic endocrine function CONCLUSION: Preemptive wirsungostomy with PD could be an appropriate procedure for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis. The high associated morbidity could be compromised by the low mortality and preservation of endocrine function compared to total pancreatectomy or severe POPF.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of prophylactic irrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy on postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, whether irrigation-suction (IS) decreases the incidence and severity of CR-POPF has not yet been well elucidated.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with planned PD were enrolled in the study at a high-volume pancreatic center in China from August 2018 to January 2020. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate whether irrigation-suction (IS) decreases the incidence and severity of CR-POPF and other postoperative complications after PD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CR-POPF, and the secondary endpoints were other postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were assigned to the control group and 60 patients to the IS group. The IS group had a comparable POPF rate (15.0% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.806) but a lower incidence of intra-abdominal infection (8.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.033) than the control group. The incidences of other postoperative complications were comparable in the two groups. The subgroup analysis for patients with intermediate/high risks for POPF also showed an equivalent POPF rate (17.0% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.800) and a significantly decreased incidence of intra-abdominal infection (8.5% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.020) in the IS group than that in the control group. The logistic regression models indicated that POPF was an independent risk factor for intra-abdominal infection (OR 0.049, 95% CI 0.013-0.182, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Irrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy does not reduce the incidence or severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula but decreases the incidence of intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Can the Realization of an External Wirsungostomy be an Option for High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

BACKGROUND

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurs in 15-20% of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and reintervention in the setting of Grade C POPF remains associated with a mortality rate of up to 25%. In patients at high risk of POPF, PD with external wirsungostomy (EW) could be a safe alternative that avoids pancreatico-enteric anastomosis while preserving the remnant pancreas.

METHODS

Of the 155 consecutive patients who underwent PD from November 2015 to December 2020, 10 patients were managed using an EW, all with a fistula risk score (FRS) ≥ 7 and BMI ≥30 kg/m², and/or major associated abdominal surgery. The pancreatic duct was cannulated with a polyethylene tube to allow good external drainage of the pancreatic fluid. We retrospectively analyzed postoperative complications and endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies.

RESULTS

The median alternative FRS was 36.9% [22.1-45.2]. There was no postoperative death. The 90-day overall severe complication (grade  ≥3) rate was 30% (n = 3 patients), no patient required reoperation, and 2 hospital readmissions occurred. 3 patients experienced Grade B POPF (30%), managed using image-guided drainage for 2 patients. The external pancreatic drain was removed after a median drainage time of 75 days [63-80]. Two patients presented with late symptoms (> 6 months) warranting interventional management (pancreaticojejunostomy and transgastric drainage). Six patients experienced significant weight loss (> 2 kg) 3 months after surgery. One year after surgery, 4 patients still complained of diarrhea and were treated with transit-delaying drugs. One patient presented new-onset diabetes one year after surgery, and 1 of the 4 patients with preexisting diabetes experienced worsening disease.

CONCLUSION

EW after PD might be a solution to reduce post-operative mortality following PD in high-risk patients.

Internal drainage for interdisciplinary management of anastomotic leakage after pancreaticogastrostomy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) may occur after pancreatic head resection, also in the setting of pancreato-gastric reconstruction. For adequate complication management, a variety of non-standardized treatments are available. Still, data on clinical evaluation of endoscopic methods remain scarce. Based on our interdisciplinary experience on endoscopic treatment of retro-gastric fluid collections after left-sided pancreatectomies, we developed an innovative endoscopic concept with internal peri-anastomotic stent placement for patients with anastomotic leakage and/or peri-anastomotic fluid collection.

METHODS

Over the period of 6 years (2015-2020) we retrospectively evaluated 531 patients after pancreatic head resections at the Department of Surgery, Charité-Unversitätsmedizin Berlin. Of these, 403 received reconstruction via pancreatogastrostomy. We identified 110 patients (27.3%) with anastomotic leakage and/or peri-anastomotic fluid collection and could define four treatment groups which received either conservative treatment (C), percutaneous drainage (PD), endoscopic drainage (ED), and/or re-operation (OP). Patients were grouped in a step-up approach for descriptive analyses and in a stratified, decision-based algorithm for comparative analyses. The study's primary endpoints were hospitalization (length of hospital stay) and clinical success (treatment success rate, primary/secondary resolution).

RESULTS

We characterized an institutional, post-operative cohort with heterogenous complication management following pancreato-gastric reconstruction. The majority of patients needed interventional treatments (n = 92, 83.6%). Of these, close to one-third (n = 32, 29.1%) were treated with endoscopy-guided, peri-anastomotic pigtail stents for internal drainage as either primary, secondary and/or tertiary treatment modality. Following a decision-based algorithm, we could discriminate superior primary-(77,8% vs 53.7%) and secondary success rates (85.7% vs 68.4%) as well as earlier primary resolutions (11.4 days, 95%CI (5.75-17.13) vs 37.4 days, 95%CI (27.2-47.5)] in patients receiving an endoscopic compared to percutaneous management.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the importance of endoscopy-guided approaches for adequate treatment of anastomotic leakage and/or peri-anastomotic fluid collections after pancreatoduodenectomy. We herein report a novel, interdisciplinary concept for internal drainage in the setting of pancreato-gastric reconstruction.

Beyond successful hemostasis: CT findings and organ failure predict postoperative death in patients suffering from post-pancreatoduodenectomy hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

To predict postoperative death even after successful hemostasis in patients with post pancreatoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula-associated hemorrhage (PPFH).

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between September 2011 and August 2020 were identified. PPFH patients were enrolled in this retrospective case-control study and divided into the Cured and Death groups. Perioperative variables were analyzed, especially the characteristics of PPFH and CT image findings.

RESULTS

Among the 2732 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies, 63 patients (2.3%) were confirmed to have PPFH. The mortality rate of patients following PPFH was 50.8% (32/63). After univariate and multivariate analysis, organ failure 24 h before initial hemorrhage (P = 0.039, OR = 11.53, 95% CI: 1.14-117.00), CT imaging findings of the operative area bubble sign (P = 0.021, OR = 5.15, 95% CI: 1.28-20.79) and PJ dehiscence (P = 0.016, OR = 8.95, 95% CI: 1.50-53.38) were remained as significant predictive factors of postoperative death for PPFH patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients following PPFH showed a high mortality rate. Organ failure and CT evidence of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) dehiscence and operative area bubble signs before initial hemorrhage may allow early prediction of postoperative death in PPFH patients.

Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the main complication after cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD). Unlike its prevention, the curative management of POPFs has long been poorly codified. This review seeks best practices for managing POPFs after CPD. The diagnosis of a POPF is based on two signs: (i) an amylase level in drained fluid more than 3 times the upper limit of the blood amylase level; and (ii) an abnormal clinical course. In the standardised definition of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery, a purely biochemical fistula is no longer counted as a POPF and is treated by gradual withdrawal of the drain over at most 3 weeks. POPF risk can be scored using pre- and intraoperative clinical criteria, many of which are related to the quality of the pancreatic parenchyma and are common to several scoring systems. The prognostic value of these scores can be improved as early as Day 1 by amylase assays in blood and drained fluid. Recent literature, including in particular the Dutch randomised trial PORSCH, argues for early systematic detection of a POPF (periodic assays, CT-scan with injection indicated on standardised clinical and biological criteria plus an opinion from a pancreatic surgeon), for rapid minimally invasive treatment of collections (percutaneous drainage, antibiotic therapy indicated on standardised criteria) to forestall severe septic and/or haemorrhagic forms, and for the swift withdrawal of abdominal drains when the risk of a POPF is theoretically low and evolution is favourable. A haemorrhage occurring after Day 1 always requires CT angiography with arterial time and monitoring in intensive care. Minimally invasive treatment of a POPF (radiologically-guided percutaneous drainage or, more rarely, endoscopic drainage, arterial embolisation) should be preferred as first-line treatment. The addition of artificial nutrition (enteral via a nasogastric or nasojejunal tube, or parenteral) is most often useful. If minimally invasive treatment fails, then reintervention is indicated, preserving the remaining pancreas if possible, but the expected mortality is higher.

Covered stent treatment for arterial complications after pancreatic surgery: risk assessment for recurrence and peri-stent implantation management

OBJECTIVES

To explore the risk factors for recurrence of arterial complications after pancreatectomy during the period of covered stent implantation and to provide some opinions on peri-stent implantation management.

METHODS

Data on patients implanted with covered stents due to arterial complications after pancreatectomy between January 2017 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Technical success, clinical success, recurrence, and survival were evaluated to elucidate the practicability of covered stents. Wilson score, Random Forest, logistic regression, and Pearson's chi-square test with bootstrap aggregation were performed for determining the perioperative risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

Among all fifty-five patients, success stent implantation (technical success) was achieved 100%. Patients who were hemodynamically stabilized without further treatment for artery complications in situ (clinical success) accounted for 89.1%. Based on statistical analysis, pre-stent implantation pancreatic fistula was identified as a robust recurrence-related risk factor for preoperative assessment (p = 0.02, OR = 4.5, 95% CI [1.2, 16.9]; p_bootstrap = 0.02). Post-stent implantation pancreatic fistula (p = 0.01, OR 4.5, 95% CI [1.4, 14.6]; p_bootstrap < 0.05) and SMA branches or GDA stumps (p = 0.02, OR 3.4, 95% CI [1.1, 10.3]) were relevant to recurrence. The survival rate during hospitalization was 87.3%. All survivors were free from recurrence during the subsequent follow-up. Vasospasm and stent occlusion were observed as short-term and long-term complications, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A covered stent implantation is a feasible and effective treatment option for post-pancreatectomy arterial complications. Rigorous management of pancreatic fistula, timely detection of problems, sensible strategies during stent implantation, and reasonable anticoagulation therapy are necessary for a better prognosis.

KEY POINTS

• A covered stent is feasible for various artery-related complications after pancreatectomy and has an ideal therapeutic effect. • Pancreatic fistula during the perioperative period of the covered stent is an independent risk factor for recurrent arterial complications and SMA branches or GDA stumps are prone to be recurrent offending arteries. • Rigorous management of pancreatic fistula, timely detection of problems, sensible strategies during stent implantation, and reasonable anticoagulation therapy are necessary for a better prognosis.

Operative Re-Intervention following Pancreatoduodenectomy: What Has Changed over the Last Decades

Background: To investigate changes over the last decades in the management of postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with special emphasis on reoperations, their indications, and outcomes. Methods: 409 patients who underwent PD between 2008 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to their need for reoperations (reoperation, n = 81, 19.8% vs. no reoperation, n = 328, 80.2%). The cohort was then compared to a second cohort comprising patients who underwent PD between 1989 and 2007 (n = 285). Results: 81 patients (19.8%) underwent reoperation. The main cause of reoperation was the dehiscence of pancreatogastrostomy (22.2%). Reoperation was associated with a longer duration of the index operation, more blood loss, and more erythrocyte concentrates being transfused. Patients who underwent reoperation showed more postoperative complications and a higher mortality rate (25% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). Compared to the earlier cohort, the observed increase in reoperations did not lead to increased mortality (5% vs. 6%, p = 353). Conclusions: The main cause for reoperation has changed over the last decades and was the dehiscence of pancreatogastrostomy. Associated with a leakage of pancreatic fluid and clinically relevant PF, it remains the most devastating complication following PD. Strategies for prevention and treatment, e.g., by endoscopic vacuum-assisted-closure therapy are of utmost importance.

Validation of the ISGLS classification of bile leakage after pancreatic surgery: A rare but severe complication

INTRODUCTION

Hepaticoenterostomy is an important step of reconstruction during hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery with a subsequent bile leakage rate of up to 5%. The International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) proposed a severity grading system for defining bile leakage after HPB surgery, which has not been validated after pancreatic surgery in a large patient cohort. The present study aimed to validate the ISGLS definition for bile leakage in pancreatic surgery and to investigate the postoperative outcomes of bile leakage after pancreatic resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the prospectively maintained database for pancreas surgery were extracted for any type of pancreatectomy with hepaticoenterostomy between 2006 and 2019. The severity of bile leakage was graded according to the ISGLS definition. The influence of our standardized hepaticoenterostomy technique and of the complexity of the surgical procedure on the rate of clinically relevant bile leakages (B and C) were assessed in three different timeframes.

RESULTS

Bile leakage was detected in 152 of 5,300 patients (2.9%). Clinically relevant bile leakages included seventy patients with grade B and eighty-two patients with grade C bile leakages (46.1% and 53.9%, respectively). During the study period, the overall rate of bile leakage showed to be stable (from 3.5% to 2.4%). Patients with grade C bile leakage had a higher rate of postoperative wound infection (P < 0.001) and longer ICU stays and hospital stays compared to patients with grade B bile leakage (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001 respectively). These parameters were significantly higher in patients with late grade C bile leakage but were similar between patients with grade B bile leakage and early grade C bile leakage (<5th day POD). In the whole patients' cohort, the 90-day mortality rate was 3.2% (174/5,300), with a rate of 25% in patients with bile leakage (38/152).

CONCLUSION

The ISGLS classification is a valid method for classifying postoperative bile leak after pancreas surgery. Standardization of our hepaticoenterostomy technique resulted in a stable rate of bile leakage. Although rare, bile leakage following pancreas surgery is a severe complication that has a major impact on patient outcomes and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality, even in the absence of POPF.

Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3)

OBJECTIVE

To assess feasibility and safety of a multicenter training program in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) adhering to the IDEAL framework for implementation of surgical innovation.

BACKGROUND

Good results for RPD have been reported from single center studies. However, data on feasibility and safety of implementation through a multicenter training program in RPD are lacking.

METHODS

A multicenter training program in RPD was designed together with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, including an online video bank, robot simulation exercises, biotissue drills, and on-site proctoring. Benchmark patients were based on the criteria of Clavien. Outcomes were collected prospectively (March 2016-October 2019). Cumulative sum analysis of operative time was performed to distinguish the first and second phase of the learning curve. Outcomes were compared between both phases of the learning curve. Trends in nationwide use of robotic and laparoscopic PD were assessed in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.

RESULTS

Overall, 275 RPD procedures were performed in seven centers by 15 trained surgeons. The recent benchmark criteria for low-risk PD were met by 125 (45.5%) patients. The conversion rate was 6.5% (n = 18) and median blood loss 250ml [interquartile range (IQR) 150-500]. The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications was 44.4% (n = 122), postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) rate 23.6% (n = 65), 90-day complication-related mortality 2.5% (n = 7) and 90-day cancer-related mortality 2.2.% (n = 6). Median postoperative hospital stay was 12 days (IQR 8-20). In the subgroup of patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 80), the major complication rate was 31.3% and POPF rate was 10%. Cumulative sum analysis for operative time found a learning curve inflection point at 22 RPDs (IQR 10-35) with similar rates of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications in the first and second phase (43.4% vs 43.8%, P = 0.956, respectively). During the study period the nationwide use of laparoscopic PD reduced from 15% to 1%, whereas the use of RPD increased from 0% to 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter RPD training program in centers with sufficient surgical volume was found to be feasible without a negative impact of the learning curve on clinical outcomes.

Surgical management of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparison of early versus late rescue pancreatectomy

Background

Rescue pancreatectomy for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with high mortality. However, in-depth literature is scarce and hard to interpret. This study aimed to evaluate the indications, timing and perioperative outcomes of rescue pancreatectomy for severe POPF after PD.

Methods

Retrospective single-centre study from all consecutive patients (2008–2020) with POPF-C after PD (ISGPS 2016 definition). Major morbidity and mortality during hospitalization or within 90 days after index surgery were evaluated. Time from index surgery to rescue pancreatectomy was dichotomized in early and late (≤ 11 versus > 11 days).

Results

From 1076 PDs performed, POPF-B/C occurred in 190 patients (17.7%) of whom 53 patients (4.9%) with POPF-C were included. Mortality after early rescue pancreatectomy did not differ significantly compared to late rescue pancreatectomy (13.6% versus 35.3%; p = 0.142). Timing of a rescue pancreatectomy did not change significantly during the study period: 11 (IQR, 8–14) (2008–2012) versus 14 (IQR, 7–33) (2013–2016) versus 8 days (IQR, 6–11) (2017–2020) (p = 0.140). Over time, the mortality in patients with POPF grade C decreased from 43.5% in 2008–2012 to 31.6% in 2013–2016 up to 0% in 2017–2020 (p = 0.014). However, mortality rates after rescue pancreatectomy did not differ significantly: 31.3% (2008–2012) versus 28.6% (2013–2016) versus 0% (2017–2020) (p = 0.104).

Conclusions

Rescue pancreatectomy for severe POPF is associated with high mortality, but an earlier timing might favourably influence the mortality. Hypothetically, this could be of value for pre-existent vulnerable patients. These findings must be carefully interpreted considering the sample sizes and differences among subgroups by patient selection.

Pure biliary leak vs. pancreatic fistula associated: non-identical twins following pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Biliary leak (BL) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may have diffrent severity depending on its association with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

METHODS

Data of 2715 patients undergoing PD between 2011 and 2020 at two European third-level referral Centers for pancreatic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. These included BL incidences, grading, outcomes, specific treatments, and association with POPF.

RESULTS

BL occurred in 6% of patients undergoing PD. Among 143 BL patients, 47% had an associated POPF and 53% a pure BL. Major morbidity (64% vs 36%) and mortality (19% vs 4%) were higher in POPF-associated BL group (all P< 0.01). Day of BL onset was similar between groups (POD 2 vs 3; P = 0.2), while BL closure occurred earlier in pure BL (POD 12 vs 23; P < 0.01). Conservative treatment was more frequent (55% vs 15%; P < 0.01), and the rate of percutaneous and/or trans-hepatic drain placement was lower (30% vs 16%; P = 0.04) in pure BL group. Relaparotomy was more common in POPF-associated BL group (42% VS 17%; P < 0.01) but was performed earlier in pure BL (POD 2 vs 10; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Pure BL represents a more benign entity, managed conservatively in half of the cases.

Total pancreatectomy as an alternative to high-risk pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score analysis on surgical outcome and quality of life

BACKGROUND

Total pancreatectomy (TP) is mentioned as alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with high-risk pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) to avoid severe pancreatic fistula-related complications, but its benefit is controversial and comparative studies are scarce.

METHODS

Cross-sectional single-center study among patients after PD with high-risk PJ versus patients after single-stage elective TP for any indication (2015-2017), using propensity scores to evaluate surgical outcomes and long-term quality of life (QoL) in three risk strata. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L were used for QoL assessment.

RESULTS

Overall, 77 patients after TP (68.8%) and 102 patients after high-risk PD (34.5%) were included. Major morbidity (29.9% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.119) and 90-day mortality (5.2% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.354) did not differ significantly between TP and high-risk PD. Interventions for intra-abdominal fluid collections (9.1% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.011) and postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (6.5% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.018) were more often required after high-risk PD, but these differences did not remain after stratification. QoL was comparable after TP and high-risk PD (75% vs. 83%; p = 0.720), even after stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

TP seems not to be inferior to high-risk PD regarding surgical outcomes and QoL. TP could be considered as an alternative to a very high-risk PD, but reluctance persists since TP does not appear to reduce mortality.

Surgical Management of Postoperative Grade C Pancreatic Fistula following Pancreatoduodenectomy

Background

The incidence of Grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula ranges from 2 to 11% depending on the type of pancreatic resection. This complication may frequently require early relaparotomy and the surgical approach remains technically challenging and is still associated with a high mortality. Infectious complications and post-operative hemorrhage are the two most common causes of reoperation.

Summary

The best management of grade C pancreatic fistulas remains controversial and ranges from conservative approaches up to completion pancreatectomy. The choice of the technique depends on the patient's conditions, intraoperative findings, and surgeon's discretion. A pancreas-preserving strategy appears to be attractive, including from simple to more complex procedures such as debridement and drainage, and external wirsungostomy. Completion pancreatectomy should be reserved for selected cases, including stable patients with severe infection complication or hemorrhage after pancreatic fistula who do not respond to pancreas-preserving procedures.

Key Messages

This review describes the current options for management of grade C pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy with regard to indication, choice of procedure and outcomes of the different approaches.

Algorithm-based care versus usual care for the early recognition and management of complications after pancreatic resection in the Netherlands: an open-label, nationwide, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Early recognition and management of postoperative complications, before they become clinically relevant, can improve postoperative outcomes for patients, especially for high-risk procedures such as pancreatic resection.

METHODS

We did an open-label, nationwide, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial that included all patients having pancreatic resection during a 22-month period in the Netherlands. In this trial design, all 17 centres that did pancreatic surgery were randomly allocated for the timing of the crossover from usual care (the control group) to treatment given in accordance with a multimodal, multidisciplinary algorithm for the early recognition and minimally invasive management of postoperative complications (the intervention group). Randomisation was done by an independent statistician using a computer-generated scheme, stratified to ensure that low-medium-volume centres alternated with high-volume centres. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment. A smartphone app was designed that incorporated the algorithm and included the daily evaluation of clinical and biochemical markers. The algorithm determined when to do abdominal CT, radiological drainage, start antibiotic treatment, and remove abdominal drains. After crossover, clinicians were trained in how to use the algorithm during a 4-week wash-in period; analyses comparing outcomes between the control group and the intervention group included all patients other than those having pancreatic resection during this wash-in period. The primary outcome was a composite of bleeding that required invasive intervention, organ failure, and 90-day mortality, and was assessed by a masked adjudication committee. This trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NL6671.

FINDINGS

From Jan 8, 2018, to Nov 9, 2019, all 1805 patients who had pancreatic resection in the Netherlands were eligible for and included in this study. 57 patients who underwent resection during the wash-in phase were excluded from the primary analysis. 1748 patients (885 receiving usual care and 863 receiving algorithm-centred care) were included. The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the algorithm-centred care group than in the usual care group (73 [8%] of 863 patients vs 124 [14%] of 885 patients; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·38-0·61; p<0·0001). Among patients treated according to the algorithm, compared with patients who received usual care there was a decrease in bleeding that required intervention (47 [5%] patients vs 51 [6%] patients; RR 0·65, 0·42-0·99; p=0·046), organ failure (39 [5%] patients vs 92 [10%] patients; 0·35, 0·20-0·60; p=0·0001), and 90-day mortality (23 [3%] patients vs 44 [5%] patients; 0·42, 0·19-0·92; p=0·029).

INTERPRETATION

The algorithm for the early recognition and minimally invasive management of complications after pancreatic resection considerably improved clinical outcomes compared with usual care. This difference included an approximate 50% reduction in mortality at 90 days.

FUNDING

The Dutch Cancer Society and UMC Utrecht.

The net parenchymal thickness predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study of objective data

BACKGROUND

The clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is still a challenging complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aims to explore the predictors of CR-POPF after PD, including net parenchymal thickness (NPT) of pancreatic neck.

METHODS

The consecutive patients who underwent PD at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on the perioperative data, which was mainly extracted from the objective data, containing the results from the laboratory tests and the imaging examination. NPT refers to the total thickness of pancreatic gland excluding main pancreatic duct (MPD) at the CT film.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses showed that total serum bilirubin (TBiL) and albumin (ALB) levels, MPD size and NPT were significantly different between the patients with and without CR-POPF. The white blood cell count, the rate of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and the postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) were associated with the incidence of CR-POPF. The proportion of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis was significantly lower in the CR-POPF group than in the non-CR-POPF group. Multivariate analyses manifested that ALB ≤35 g/L and NPT >10 mm were two of the independent risk factors for CR-POPF.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ALB ≤35 g/L and NPT > 10 mm were both the independent predictors of CR-POPF. CR-POPF was associated with the higher IAI rate and the extended LOS.

Biliopancreatic and biliary leak after pancreatoduodenectomy treated by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

BACKGROUND

Complementary to percutaneous intra-abdominal drainage, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) might ameliorate healing of pancreatic fistula and biliary leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy by diversion of bile from the site of leakage. This study evaluated technical and clinical outcomes of PTBD for this indication.

METHODS

All patients undergoing PTBD for leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively evaluated in two tertiary pancreatic centers (2014-2019). Technical success was defined as external biliary drainage. Clinical success was defined as discharge with a resolved leak, without additional surgical interventions for anastomotic leakage other than percutaneous intra-abdominal drainage.

RESULTS

Following 822 pancreatoduodenectomies, 65 patients (8%) underwent PTBD. Indications were leakage of the pancreaticojejunostomy (n = 25; 38%), hepaticojejunostomy (n = 15; 23%) and of both (n = 25; 38%). PTBD was technically successful in 64 patients (98%) with drain revision in 40 patients (63%). Clinical success occurred in 60 patients (94%). Leakage resolved after median 33 days (IQR 21-60). PTBD related complications occurred in 23 patients (35%), including cholangitis (n = 14; 21%), hemobilia (n = 7; 11%) and PTBD related bleeding requiring re-intervention (n = 4; 6%). In hospital mortality was 3% (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Although drain revisions and complications are common, PTBD is highly feasible and appears to be effective in the treatment of biliopancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Dual-Energy CT Iodine Concentration to Evaluate Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy

Background Pancreatic fibrosis and fatty infiltration are associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), but accurate preoperative assessment remains a challenge. Iodine concentration (IC) and fat fraction derived from dual-energy CT (DECT) may reflect the amount of fibrosis and steatosis, potentially enabling the preoperative prediction of POPF. Purpose To identify multiphasic DECT-derived IC and fat fraction that improve the prediction of POPF risks compared with contrast-enhanced CT attenuation values and to evaluate the underlying histopathologic changes. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and DECT (including pancreatic parenchymal, portal venous, and delayed phase scanning) between January 2020 and December 2020. The relationships of the quantitative DECT-derived IC and fat fraction, along with CT attenuation values from enhanced images with POPF risk, were analyzed with logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of the IC was compared with that of the CT values. The histopathologic underpinnings of IC were evaluated with multivariable linear regression analysis. Results A total of 107 patients (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 57-70 years; 56 men) were included. Of these, 23 (21%) had POPF. The pancreatic parenchymal-to-portal venous phase IC ratio (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 13; 95% CI: 2, 162; P < .001) was an independent predictor of POPF occurrence. The accuracy of the pancreatic parenchymal-to-portal venous phase IC ratio in predicting POPF was higher than that of the CT value ratio in the same phases (78% vs 65%, P < .001). The pancreatic parenchymal-to-portal venous phase IC ratio was independently associated with pancreatic fibrosis (β = -1.04; 95% CI: -0.44, -1.64; P = .001). Conclusion A higher pancreatic parenchymal-to-portal venous phase IC ratio was associated with less histologic fibrosis and greater risk of POPF. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lee and Yoon in this issue.

Protective peritoneal patch for arteries during pancreatoduodenectomy: good value for money

PURPOSE

This study proposes and details a simple and inexpensive protective technique of wrapping the hepatic and gastroduodenal artery stumps with a peritoneal patch during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in order to decrease post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH).

METHODS

Among the 85 patients who underwent PD between July 2020 and March 2021, 16 patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis received a peritoneal patch. The Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) was calculated. Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and PPH were diagnosed and graded according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The mortality rate was calculated up to 90 days after PD.

RESULTS

The mean ua-FRS of the 16 patients was 43% (range: 21-63%). Among them, 6 (38%) experienced clinically relevant-POPF, and a PPH was observed in two patients (13%). In these two patients who required re-intervention, the peritoneal patch was remarkably intact, and neither the gastroduodenal stump nor hepatic artery was involved. None of the patients experienced 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although the outcomes are encouraging, the evaluation of a larger series to assess the effectiveness of the peritoneal protective patch for arteries in a high-risk pancreatic anastomosis is ongoing.

Completion pancreatectomy or a pancreas-preserving procedure during relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicentre cohort study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that primary percutaneous catheter drainage has become standard practice, some patients with pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy ultimately undergo a relaparotomy. The aim of this study was to compare completion pancreatectomy with a pancreas-preserving procedure in patients undergoing relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of nine institutions included patients who underwent relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy from 2005-2018. Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

From 4877 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 786 (16 per cent) developed a pancreatic fistula grade B/C and 162 (3 per cent) underwent a relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula. Of these patients, 36 (22 per cent) underwent a completion pancreatectomy and 126 (78 per cent) a pancreas-preserving procedure. Mortality was higher after completion pancreatectomy (20 (56 per cent) versus 40 patients (32 per cent); P = 0.009), which remained after adjusting for sex, age, BMI, ASA score, previous reintervention, and organ failure in the 24 h before relaparotomy (adjusted odds ratio 2.55, 95 per cent c.i. 1.07 to 6.08). The proportion of additional reinterventions was not different between groups (23 (64 per cent) versus 84 patients (67 per cent); P = 0.756). The meta-analysis including 33 studies evaluating 745 patients, confirmed the association between completion pancreatectomy and mortality (Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model: odds ratio 1.99, 95 per cent c.i. 1.03 to 3.84).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current data, a pancreas-preserving procedure seems preferable to completion pancreatectomy in patients in whom a relaparotomy is deemed necessary for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in Vietnamese patients with periampullary of Vater malignancies: A single-institution prospective study

Introduction

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is a technically complex technique, that is being used to treat periampullary malignancy. We provide our experience with laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD) with statistics on the outcomes of periampullary cancer patients.

Material and method

Thirty patients underwent surgery between June 1, 2016 and May 30, 2020, with 21 undergoing classical PD and 9 undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Prospectively gathered data on surgical outcomes and long-term oncological results are given.

Results

The median operative time was 277.5 min (range, 258.7–330 min), and the median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 319.5 mL (range, 241.2–425 mL). The rate of conversion to OPD, surgical reintervention, and mortality was 20%, 13.3%, and 10% respectively. Cumulative surgery-related morbidity was 33.4%, including bleeding (n = 4), severe POPF (n = 4), biliary fistula (n = 1), DGE (n = 2), and intestinal obstruction (n = 1). Pathologic diagnoses were AoV cancer (n = 23), distal CBD cancer (n = 4), PDAC (n = 2), and AoV NET (n = 1). The mean survival time of the LAPD group was 29.9 months. The long-term survival time of the N0 group was 36.8 months, which was significantly longer than that of the N1 group. The long-term survival times of stages I–B, II-A, and II-B were 36.9, 26.5, and 15.7 months, respectively (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

LAPD has a high rate of conversion to OPD, morbidity, and mortality. However, LPD is feasible technique for highly selected patients. Lymph node metastasis and stage of disease are the risk factors for long-term survival.

•

Most of tumours that develop in the periampullary of the Vater region are malignant.

•

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) remains the most challenging procedure in laparoscopic surgery with the rate of conversion to OPD, morbility, and mortality was 0–40%, 3.8%–50%, and 1.6%–8%, respectively.

•

In the first 30 cases, LAPD has a high rate of complications, conversion to OPD, and mortality. However, LAPD is feasible method and can provide acceptable oncological results with careful patient selection.

•

Experience, learning curve, and high-volume centre might have influenced the results.

Para-aortic lymph nodes and ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Distant neighbors?

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymph nodes in the ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head are regarded as distant metastases. Chemotherapy is considered the only treatment option if para-aortic lymph nodes metastases are detected preoperatively or intraoperatively. The role of standardized para-aortic lymph node lymphadenectomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate complication profiles and survival.

METHODS

All cases of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database (n = 289). Para-aortic lymph node lymphadenectomy was routinely performed in all patients with suspected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Subgroup analysis was performed between patients with histologically positive (+) and negative (-) para-aortic lymph nodes. Patients receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy without para-aortic lymph node lymphadenectomy for other causes served as a control group.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients received para-aortic lymph node lymphadenectomy, of which 41 were positive for para-aortic lymph node metastases. In 97 patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, no para-aortic lymph node lymphadenectomy was performed owing to postoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis. Clinicopathologic data were homogenously distributed. Hospital stay and postoperative morbidity demonstrated no significant difference between the 3 subgroups. The median overall survival of 19.63 months (95% confidence interval: 14.57-24.79 months) in para-aortic lymph node- patients was not statistically different when compared with the median overall survival of 18.22 months (95% confidence interval: 12.68-23.75 months) in para-aortic lymph node + patients (log-rank test P = .223). Preoperative computed tomography was a poor predictor for para-aortic lymph node status (sensitivity = 10.3%, specificity = 97.8%).

CONCLUSION

This study represents the largest cohort receiving routine para-aortic lymph node lymphadenectomy. Extended lymphadenectomy can be performed safely and, although disease-free survival of para-aortic lymph node+ patients was significantly shorter, overall survival and postrelapse survival were on par with that of para-aortic lymph node- patients. Preoperative computed tomography indicating para-aortic lymph node metastasis should not preclude curative resection.

Clinical implications of bile cultures obtained during pancreatoduodenectomy: a cohort study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between intraoperative bile cultures and infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy remains unclear. This cohort study and meta-analysis aimed to determine the predictive role of intraoperative bile cultures in abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

The cohort study included 114 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. Regression analyses were used to estimate the odds to develop an organ space infection (OSI) or isolated OSI (OSIs without a simultaneous complication potentially contaminating the intraabdominal space) after a positive bile culture. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on abdominal infectious complications (Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model).

RESULTS

The positive bile culture rate was 61%, predominantly in patients after preoperative biliary drainage (98% vs 26%, p < 0.001). OSIs occurred in 35 patients (31%) and isolated OSIs in nine patients (8%) and were not associated with positive bile cultures (OSIs: odds ratio = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.25-1.23, isolated OSIs: odds ratio = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.20-3.04). In the meta-analysis, 15 studies reporting on 2047 patients showed no association between positive bile cultures and abdominal infectious complications (pooled odds ratio = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.98-1.65).

CONCLUSION

Given the rare occurrence of isolated OSIs and similar odds for patients with positive and negative bile cultures to develop abdominal infectious complications, routine performance of bile cultures should be reconsidered.

Surgical margin clearance and extended chemotherapy defines survival for synchronous oligometastatic liver lesions of the ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Background

The role of surgery for circumscribed synchronous hepatic lesions of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. Thus, the aim of our study was to compare survival outcome (OS) after surgery of patients with hepatic metastases (M1surg) to patients with only localized disease.

Methods

Correlation analysis of clinicopathological data and OS after resection of M1surg patients and patients with localized PDACs (M0) was performed. Patients were included for survival analysis only if a complete staging including perineural, venous and lymphatic invasion was available.

Results

Out of the study collective, 35 patients received extended surgery (M1surg), whereas 131 patients received standardized surgery for localized disease (M0). Length of hospitalization and mortality was similar in both groups. FOLFIRNOX as an adjuvant treatment regime was administered in ~ 23 and ~ 8% of M1surg and M0 patients, respectively. In subgroup analysis of R0 resected patients and in multivariate analysis of the total cohort, there was no difference in overall survival between both groups. Only the resection status (R1 vs R0) and venous invasion (V1) were identified as independent prognostic factors. Site of recurrence in R0 resected M1surg patients and in M0 patients were homogenously distributed.

Conclusion

This is the first study demonstrating a survival benefit after extended surgery for synchronously hepatic-metastasized PDACs. We found no difference in survival outcome of metastasized patients when compared to patients with localized disease. FOLFIRINOX as an adjuvant treatment regime for resected M1surg presumably is worthwhile. Larger multicenter studies are still needed to validate our results.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-01961-5.