1
|
Shammas RL, Hassan AM, Sergesketter AR, Berlin NL, Mirza HN, Guzman NM, Naga HI, Vingan P, Govande JG, Silverstein ML, Momeni A, Sisk GC, Largo RD, Momoh AO, Nelson JA, Matros E, Phillips BT. A Multi-institutional Analysis of a Textbook Outcome Among Patients Undergoing Microvascular Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92:S453-S460. [PMID: 38857013 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual outcomes may not accurately reflect the quality of perioperative care. Textbook outcomes (TOs) are composite metrics that provide a comprehensive evaluation of hospital performance and surgical quality. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of TOs in a multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. METHODS For autologous reconstruction, a TO was previously defined as a procedure without intraoperative complications, reoperation, infection requiring intravenous antibiotics, readmission, mortality, systemic complications, operative duration ≤12 hours for bilateral and ≤10 hours for unilateral/stacked reconstruction, and length of stay (LOS) ≤5 days. We investigated associations between patient-level factors and achieving a TO using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS Of 1000 patients, most (73.2%) met a TO. The most common reasons for deviation from a TO were reoperation (9.6%), prolonged operative time (9.5%), and prolonged LOS (9.2%). On univariate analysis, tobacco use, obesity, widowed/divorced marital status, and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy or bilateral reconstruction were associated with a lower likelihood of TOs (P < 0.05). After adjustment, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (odds ratio [OR], 5.71; P = 0.029) and hormonal therapy (OR, 1.53; P = 0.050) were associated with a higher likelihood of TOs; higher body mass index (OR, 0.91; P = <0.001) was associated with a lower likelihood. CONCLUSION Approximately 30% of patients did not achieve a TO, and the likelihood of achieving a TO was influenced by patient and procedural factors. Future studies should investigate how this metric may be used to evaluate patient and hospital-level performance to improve the quality of care in reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie L Shammas
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Abbas M Hassan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amanda R Sergesketter
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Nicholas L Berlin
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Humza N Mirza
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Natalie M Guzman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Hani I Naga
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Perri Vingan
- Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Janhavi G Govande
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Max L Silverstein
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Arash Momeni
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Geoffroy C Sisk
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Rene D Largo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adeyiza O Momoh
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Evan Matros
- Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brett T Phillips
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yun JY, Jeon DN, Jeon BJ, Kim EK. Factors influencing the decision-making process in breast reconstruction from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons: A qualitative study involving Korean plastic surgeons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 93:72-80. [PMID: 38670035 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little research has been conducted on factors influencing the decision-making process for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) options from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons, despite its significant impact on doctor-patient communication and shared decision-making. This study aims to explore the multiple factors and the mechanisms by which they interact using a qualitative methodology. We also address potential barriers to shared decision-making in IBR. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of reconstructive surgeons. Thematic analysis was used to identify key influences on IBR decision-making process from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons. RESULTS Four major themes were identified: 1. Patient clinical scenarios; 2. Nonclinical practice environments; 3. Reconstructive surgeon preferences; and 4. Patient consultation. Reconstructive surgeons demonstrated diverse approaches to patient clinical scenarios. High-volume centers were significantly influenced by nonclinical factors such as scheduling and operating room allocation systems. Reconstructive surgeons often had strong personal preferences for specific IBR options, shaped by their expertise, experience, and clinical environment. Based on the preliminary decision, surgeons provided information with varying degrees of neutrality. Patients varied in their knowledge and participation, resulting in variation in the final decision authority among surgeons. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the need to address nonclinical environmental constraints to improve shared decision-making process in IBR. Surgeons should recognize power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship and be aware of their biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Young Yun
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Dong Nyeok Jeon
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Korea
| | - Byung-Joon Jeon
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Key Kim
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu L, Gong J, Sun X, Zang M, Liu L, Yu S. Assessing the Content and Effect of Web-Based Decision Aids for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e53872. [PMID: 38801766 PMCID: PMC11165285 DOI: 10.2196/53872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Web-based decision aids have been shown to have a positive effect when used to improve the quality of decision-making for women facing postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). However, the existing findings regarding these interventions are still incongruent, and the overall effect is unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the content of web-based decision aids and its impact on decision-related outcomes (ie, decision conflict, decision regret, informed choice, and knowledge), psychological-related outcomes (ie, satisfaction and anxiety), and surgical decision-making in women facing PMBR. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 6 databases, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection, were searched starting at the time of establishment of the databases to May 2023, and an updated search was conducted on April 1, 2024. MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and text words were used. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials was used to assess the risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS In total, 7 studies included 579 women and were published between 2008 and 2023, and the sample size in each study ranged from 26 to 222. The results showed that web-based decision aids used audio and video to present the pros and cons of PMBR versus no PMBR, implants versus flaps, and immediate versus delayed PMBR and the appearance and feel of the PMBR results and the expected recovery time with photographs of actual patients. Web-based decision aids help improve PMBR knowledge, decisional conflict (mean difference [MD]=-5.43, 95% CI -8.87 to -1.99; P=.002), and satisfaction (standardized MD=0.48, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.95; P=.05) but have no effect on informed choice (MD=-2.80, 95% CI -8.54 to 2.94; P=.34), decision regret (MD=-1.55, 95% CI -6.00 to 2.90 P=.49), or anxiety (standardized MD=0.04, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.58; P=.88). The overall Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation quality of the evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that the web-based decision aids provide a modern, low-cost, and high dissemination rate effective method to promote the improved quality of decision-making in women undergoing PMBR. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023450496; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=450496.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yu
- School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Jianmei Gong
- School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoting Sun
- School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Min Zang
- School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Lei Liu
- School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Shengmiao Yu
- Outpatient Department, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wuyts K, Durston V, Morstyn L, Mills S, White V. Information needs in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis of free-text responses from 2077 women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:147-157. [PMID: 38300358 PMCID: PMC11063103 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07240-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For many, breast reconstruction following mastectomy (BR) forms an integral part of breast cancer survivorship. For those considering BR, provision of information is essential to allow informed decisions. Using free-text responses from a survey of breast cancer survivors, this study aims to understand current gaps in information regarding BR. METHOD At the end of an online survey assessing BR experiences, participants were asked the open-ended question: "Thinking about women who may experience BR in the future, is there anything you think needs to change so that they have a better experience?". Responses were analysed to identify common themes. RESULTS 3384 people completed the survey with 2,077 (61%) responding to the open-ended question. Three themes were identified: (1) content of information, (2) managing expectations, and (3) information sources, each associated with multiple subthemes. Information wanted in theme (1) covered a range of topics including BR options, risks, recovery and 'going flat.' Information on BR's psychological impact was also needed, with comments indicating many were not prepared for this. Theme (2) stressed the importance of realistic information about BR outcomes and processes to reduce discrepancies between expectations and experiences. In theme (3), peer insights and photos were important sources of realistic information. CONCLUSION Multiple gaps exist in BR-related information available to women. BR information needs to be comprehensive, realistic, and provided at the right time to allow informed decision-making. Developing strategies to strengthen existing information provision as well as new resources to fill information gaps might enhance BR experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Wuyts
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, 3220, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Vicki Durston
- Breast Cancer Network Australia, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Morstyn
- Breast Cancer Network Australia, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - Sam Mills
- Breast Cancer Network Australia, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, 3220, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aggarwal A, Han L, Lewis D, Costigan J, Hubbard A, Taylor J, Rigg A, Purushotham A, van der Meulen J. Association of travel time, patient characteristics, and hospital quality with patient mobility for breast cancer surgery: A national population-based study. Cancer 2024; 130:1221-1233. [PMID: 38186226 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This national study investigated hospital quality and patient factors associated with treatment location for breast cancer surgery. METHODS By using linked administrative data sets from the English National Health Service, the authors identified all women diagnosed between January 2, 2016, and December 31, 2018, who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or a mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. The extent to which patients bypassed their nearest hospital was investigated using a geographic information system (ArcGIS). Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the impact of travel time, hospital quality, and patient characteristics. RESULTS 22,622 Of 69,153 patients undergoing BCS, 22,622 (32.7%) bypassed their nearest hospital; and, of 23,536 patients undergoing mastectomy, 7179 (30.5%) bypassed their nearest hospital. Women who were younger, without comorbidities, or from rural areas were more likely to travel to more distant hospitals (p < .05). Patients undergoing BCS (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.50) or mastectomy (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.02) were more likely to be treated at specialist breast reconstruction centers despite not undergoing the procedure. Patients receiving mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction were more likely to travel to hospitals employing surgeons who had a media reputation (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.28-4.52). Patients undergoing BCS were less likely to travel to hospitals with shorter surgical waiting times (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92). The authors did not observe a significant impact for research activity, hospital quality rating, breast re-excision rates, or the status as a multidisciplinary cancer center. CONCLUSIONS Patient choice policies may drive inequalities in the health care system without improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Daniel Lewis
- UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, Agriculture Ministry of the United Kingdom, London, UK
| | | | - Alison Hubbard
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Anne Rigg
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Arnie Purushotham
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Knowles AJ. Advocating for Enhanced Patient Engagement in Breast Cancer Care: Impact of Residual Increased Lateral Adiposity and Consideration of the Pursuit of "Living Flat". Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:e186-e194. [PMID: 38326163 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a significant health concern, accounting for a substantial proportion of cancer cases. Despite improvements in cancer survivorship, many women still require mastectomy as part of their therapeutic treatment. Mastectomy alone or delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) are two options available to women not suitable for immediate breast reconstruction at initial mastectomy. However, the presence of increased lateral adiposity (ILA) following mastectomy, commonly referred to as ``dog-ears,'' can lead to discomfort and aesthetic concerns. This paper explores the benefits and harms of ILA postmastectomy and its impact on patient satisfaction when choosing between mastectomy alone or DBR. A literature search was completed within OVID Medline, 1946-current, with the following terms, filtered for relevance: "mastectomy," "autologous reconstruction," "scar," "body image/dysmorphia," "patient-reported outcomes," "reconstructive surgical procedures/excess skin," "surgical flaps/dog ear." The disparity between clinical support and educational resources available for patients considering DBR options compared to those choosing mastectomy alone or pursuit of "living flat" is discussed. A common theme from qualitative research was the reported feeling of lack of inclusion in reconstruction planning by the patient. There were instances reported of residual skin remaining postmastectomy, against patient wishes. The findings emphasized the importance of shared decision-making and comprehensive preoperative education to ensure that patients are well-informed and satisfied with their chosen treatment approach. Further research is needed to address the specific needs and preferences of patients opting for mastectomy and to improve surgical techniques and education regarding living-flat options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Knowles
- Pioneer Wound healing and Lymphoedema Centres, Eastbourne, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hannoun-Lévi JM, Savignoni A, Féron JG, Malhaire C, Ezzili C, Brédart A, Loap P, Kirova Y. Management of second ipsilateral breast tumor event: An advocacy for a randomized trial. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:188-194. [PMID: 38216433 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
For a second ipsilateral breast tumor event, salvage mastectomy is the standard of care while second conservative treatment is a possible option. However, level 1 proofs are missing, leading to perform salvage mastectomy for patients who could receive second conservative treatment and consequently avoid psychological/quality of life salvage mastectomy deleterious impacts. A phase 3 randomized trial comparing salvage mastectomy to second conservative treatment is needed. Here we discuss what would be to us the optimal design of such trial to confirm the non-inferiority between the two salvage options, with a focus on methodological aspects in terms of patient characteristics and statistical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-M Hannoun-Lévi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - A Savignoni
- Department of Biostatistics, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J-G Féron
- Department of Breast Surgery, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Malhaire
- Department of Medical Imaging, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Ezzili
- Department of Clinical Research, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Brédart
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - P Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li X, Meng M, Yang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhao J, Yin Y, Pei X, Hao Y. "All about the value?" Decisional needs of breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the Chinese context: A mixed-methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 120:108102. [PMID: 38141445 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore breast cancer (BC) patients' participation in breast reconstruction (BR) decision-making and specific decisional needs, especially the manifestations and causes of decisional conflicts, in China. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted using triangulation of data from interviews and a questionnaire survey with health care professionals (HCPs) and BC patients with BR decision-making experience at 5 Beijing centers. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework guided (ODSF) the qualitative and quantitative data analyses. RESULTS A total of 82.53% of Chinese BC patients would consider BR. Seven themes captured patients' BR decisional needs per the ODSF: inadequate support/resources (100%, 58.82%) and knowledge (75%, 52.94%) were most frequently cited. Health beliefs (unclear values) reflected Chinese characteristics. Patients had inadequate knowledge (M=19.99/50, SD=8.67) but positive BR attitudes (M=59.48/95, SD=10.45). CONCLUSIONS BR decisions for Chinese BC patients are complex and often accompanied by decisional conflicts. Inadequate knowledge and inadequate support and resources contribute to these conflicts, emphasizing the need for culturally tailored information and support to promote SDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS HCPs need specialized training in SDM to guide patients in decision-making. It is essential to provide relevant resources and support that are culturally and clinically appropriate for Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Li
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Meiqi Meng
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Yang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingyuan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
| | - Yiyi Yin
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Pei
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yufang Hao
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang J, Xiang ZZ, Tan CF, Zeng YY, Yang T, Wei XY, Yu ST, Dai ZL, Xu NY, Liu L. Individualized 3D-printed bolus promotes precise postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients receiving breast reconstruction. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1239636. [PMID: 38152364 PMCID: PMC10751906 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1239636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D-printed tissue compensations in breast cancer patients receiving breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Methods and materials We enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving breast reconstruction and PMRT. The dose distribution of target and skin, conformability, and dose limit of organs at risk (OARs) were collected to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed bolus. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation injury classification was used to evaluated the skin toxicities. Results A total of 30 patients diagnosed between October 2019 to July 2021 were included for analysis. Among all the patients, the 3D-printed bolus could ensure the dose coverage of planning target volume (PTV) [homogeneity index (HI) 0.12 (range: 0.08-0.18)], and the mean doses of D99%, D98%, D95%, D50%, D2% and Dmean were 4606.29cGy, 4797.04cGy, 4943.32cGy, 5216.07cGy, 5236.10cGy, 5440.28cGy and 5462.10cGy, respectively. The bolus demonstrated an excellent conformability, and the mean air gaps between the bolus and the chest wall in five quadrants were 0.04cm, 0.18cm, 0.04cm, 0.04cm and 0.07cm, respectively. In addition, the bolus had acceptable dosage limit of OARs [ipsilateral lung: Dmean 1198.68 cGy, V5 46.10%, V20 21.66%, V30 16.31%); heart: Dmean 395.40 cGy, V30 1.02%, V40 0.22%; spinal cord planning risk volume (PRV): Dmax 1634 cGy] and skin toxicity (grade 1, 76.0%; grade 2, 21.0%; grade 3, 3.3%). Conclusion The 3D-printed bolus offers advantages in terms of dose uniformity and controllable skin toxicities in patients receiving breast reconstruction and PMRT. Further research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the 3Dprinted bolus in this patient subset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lei Liu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West, China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shammas RL, Hung A, Mullikin A, Sergesketter AR, Lee CN, Reed SD, Fish LJ, Greenup RA, Hollenbeck ST. Patient Preferences for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:1285-1292. [PMID: 37755818 PMCID: PMC10535024 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Importance Up to 40% of women experience dissatisfaction after breast reconstruction due to unexpected outcomes that are poorly aligned with personal preferences. Identifying what attributes patients value when considering surgery could improve shared decision-making. Adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC) analysis can elicit individual-level treatment preferences. Objectives To identify which attributes of breast reconstruction are most important to women considering surgery and to describe how these attributes differ by those who prefer flap vs implant reconstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants This web-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from March 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023, at Duke University and between June 1 and December 31, 2022, through the Love Research Army with ACBC analysis. Participants were 105 women at Duke University with a new diagnosis of or genetic predisposition to breast cancer who were considering mastectomy with reconstruction and 301 women with a history of breast cancer or a genetic predisposition as identified through the Love Research Army registry. Main Outcomes and Measures Relative importance scores, part-worth utility values, and maximum acceptable risks were estimated. Results Overall, 406 women (105 from Duke University [mean (SD) age, 46.3 (10.5) years] and 301 from the Love Research Army registry [mean (SD) age, 59.2 (11.9) years]) participated. The attribute considered most important was the risk of abdominal morbidity (mean [SD] relative importance [RI], 28% [11%]), followed by chance of major complications (RI, 25% [10%]), number of additional operations (RI, 23% [12%]), appearance of the breasts (RI, 13% [12%]), and recovery time (RI, 11% [7%]). Most participants (344 [85%]) preferred implant-based reconstruction; these participants cared most about abdominal morbidity (mean [SD] RI, 30% [11%]), followed by the risk of complications (mean [SD], RI, 26% [11%]) and additional operations (mean [SD] RI, 21% [12%]). In contrast, participants who preferred flap reconstruction cared most about additional operations (mean [SD] RI, 31% [15%]), appearance of the breasts (mean [SD] RI, 27% [16%]), and risk of complications (mean [SD] RI, 18% [6%]). Factors independently associated with choosing flap reconstruction included being married (odds ratio [OR], 2.30 [95% CI, 1.04-5.08]; P = .04) and higher educational level (college education; OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.01-5.86]; P = .048), while having an income level of greater than $75 000 was associated with a decreased likelihood of choosing the flap profile (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21-0.97]; P = .01). Respondents who preferred flap appearance were willing to accept a mean (SD) increase of 14.9% (2.2%) chance of abdominal morbidity (n = 113) or 6.4% (4.8%) chance of complications (n = 115). Conclusions and Relevance This study provides information on how women value different aspects of their care when making decisions for breast reconstruction. Future studies should assess how decision aids that elicit individual-level preferences can help tailor patient-physician discussions to focus preoperative counseling on factors that matter most to each patient and ultimately improve patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie L. Shammas
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Anna Hung
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alexandria Mullikin
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amanda R. Sergesketter
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Clara N. Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Shelby D. Reed
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Laura J. Fish
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rachel A. Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Scott T. Hollenbeck
- Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hannoun-Levi JM, Gal J, Polgar C, Strnad V, Loessl K, Polat B, Kauer-Domer D, Schiappa R, Gutierrez C. Second Conservative Treatment for Local Recurrence Breast Cancer: A GEC-ESTRO Oncological Outcome and Prognostic Factor Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1200-1210. [PMID: 37459998 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE For second ipsilateral breast tumor event (2nd IBTE), second conservative treatment (2nd CT) combining lumpectomy plus accelerated partial breast reirradiation (APBrI) represents a curative option. The aim of this study was to analyze oncological prognostic factors for patients with a 2nd IBTE treated with 2nd CT. METHODS AND MATERIALS An analysis of clinical practices was conducted across 7 academic hospitals/cancer centers in 6 European countries based on the GEC-ESTRO database. Patients presenting a 2nd IBTE occurring after conservative surgery (lumpectomy + axillary evaluation) and irradiation performed for the primary tumor underwent a 2nd CT with brachytherapy-based APBrI. The main outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence (CI) rate of second local relapse. All analyzed patients were classified according to risk groups for Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and molecular classification and time interval between first and second breast surgery (TIS1S2). Finally, we combined GEC-ESTRO APBI, molecular, and TIS1S2 risk groups, leading to the definition of a new score (named TAM: score based on the combination of time interval [T] between first and second surgery and APBI [A] and molecular [M] classifications) specifically designed for 2nd IBTE oncological outcome analysis. RESULTS From July 1994 to January 2021, a total of 508 patients received a 2nd CT. At the time of 2nd IBTE, median age was 64.6 years (range, 56.2-72.6). With a median follow-up of 60.9 months (56.2-72.6), the 5-year second local relapse CI rate was 4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2%-6%). The 5-year distant metastasis disease CI rate was 7% (95% CI, 4%-10%). Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 89% (95% CI, 86%-93%) and 91% (95% CI, 88%-94%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, TAM score was an independent prognostic factor for all the oncological items (P < .001) except disease-specific survival (P = .07) and overall survival (P = .09). The grade ≥3 late toxicity rate was 12.1%. CONCLUSIONS This analysis of 2nd CT combining lumpectomy with APBrI for 2nd IBTE confirmed the excellent oncological results obtained after 2nd CT. Furthermore, the GEC-ESTRO TAM score appears to be an important prognostic factor, assisting patients and physicians in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Epidemiology/Biostatistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Csaba Polgar
- Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bulent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wurzburg University, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Kauer-Domer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Epidemiology/Biostatistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Crisitna Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu C, Pfob A, Mehrara BJ, Yin P, Nelson JA, Pusic AL, Sidey-Gibbons C. Enhanced Surgical Decision-Making Tools in Breast Cancer: Predicting 2-Year Postoperative Physical, Sexual, and Psychosocial Well-Being following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction (INSPiRED 004). Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7046-7059. [PMID: 37516723 PMCID: PMC10562277 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13971-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to predict clinically meaningful changes in physical, sexual, and psychosocial well-being for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction 2 years after surgery using machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on clinical and patient-reported outcomes data. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used data from women undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction at 11 study sites in North America to develop three distinct ML models. We used data of ten sites to predict clinically meaningful improvement or worsening by comparing pre-surgical scores with 2 year follow-up data measured by validated Breast-Q domains. We employed ten-fold cross-validation to train and test the algorithms, and then externally validated them using the 11th site's data. We considered area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristics-curve (AUC) as the primary metric to evaluate performance. RESULTS Overall, between 1454 and 1538 patients completed 2 year follow-up with data for physical, sexual, and psychosocial well-being. In the hold-out validation set, our ML algorithms were able to predict clinically significant changes in physical well-being (chest and upper body) (worsened: AUC range 0.69-0.70; improved: AUC range 0.81-0.82), sexual well-being (worsened: AUC range 0.76-0.77; improved: AUC range 0.74-0.76), and psychosocial well-being (worsened: AUC range 0.64-0.66; improved: AUC range 0.66-0.66). Baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) variables showed the largest influence on model predictions. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning can predict long-term individual PROs of patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction with acceptable accuracy. This may better help patients and clinicians make informed decisions regarding expected long-term effect of treatment, facilitate patient-centered care, and ultimately improve postoperative health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Xu
- Section of Patient Centered Analytics, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - André Pfob
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Babak J Mehrara
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peimeng Yin
- Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Department of Surgery, Patient-Reported Outcome Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chris Sidey-Gibbons
- Section of Patient Centered Analytics, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu SS, Raymer C, Culbert A, Schafer R, Bernard S, Djohan R, Schwarz G, Bishop SN, Gurunian R. Predictors of Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP Flaps: Implications for Management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:566e-577e. [PMID: 36862950 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the standard for autologous breast reconstruction. This study investigated risk factors for DIEP complications in a large, contemporary cohort to optimize surgical evaluation and planning. METHODS This retrospective study included patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 at an academic institution. Demographics, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated in univariable and multivariable regression models for postoperative complications. RESULTS In total, 802 DIEP flaps were performed in 524 patients (mean age, 51.2 ± 9.6 years; mean body mass index, 29.3 ± 4.5). Most patients (87%) had breast cancer; 15% were BRCA -positive. There were 282 (53%) delayed and 242 (46%) immediate reconstructions and 278 (53%) bilateral and 246 (47%) unilateral reconstructions. Overall complications occurred in 81 patients (15.5%), including venous congestion (3.4%), breast hematoma (3.6%), infection (3.6%), partial flap loss (3.2%), total flap loss (2.3%), and arterial thrombosis (1.3%). Longer operative time was significantly associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions and higher body mass index. Prolonged operative time (OR, 1.16; P = 0.001) and immediate reconstruction (OR, 1.92; P = 0.013) were significant predictors of overall complications. Partial flap loss was associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions, higher body mass index, current smoking status, and longer operative time. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged operative time is a significant risk factor for overall complications and partial flap loss in DIEP breast reconstruction. For each additional hour of surgical time, the risk of developing overall complications increases by 16%. These findings suggest that reducing operative time through co-surgeon approaches, consistency in surgical teams, and counseling patients with more risk factors toward delayed reconstructions may mitigate complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon S Wu
- From the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Charles Raymer
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - August Culbert
- From the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Rachel Schafer
- From the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Steven Bernard
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Risal Djohan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Graham Schwarz
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Sarah N Bishop
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Raffi Gurunian
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sergesketter AR, Mundy LR, Geng Y, Shammas RL, Langdell HC, Wang SM, Njoroge M, Stukes B, Hollenbeck ST. Mapping Patient Encounters in Breast Cancer Care: An Analysis of 8800 Clinical Encounters Among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90:S433-S439. [PMID: 36913551 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitions toward value-based systems require a comprehensive definition of the complexity and duration of provider effort required for a given diagnosis. This study modeled the numbers of clinical encounters involved in various treatment pathways among breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS Clinical encounters with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, breast surgeons, or plastic surgeons ≤4 years after diagnosis among all patients undergoing mastectomy from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed. Relative encounter volumes were modeled each 90-day period after diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 8807 breast cancer-related encounters from 221 patients were analyzed, with mean (SD) encounter volume 39.9 (27.2) encounters per patient. Most encounters occurred in the first year after diagnosis (70.0%), with years 2, 3, and 4 representing 15.8%, 9.1%, and 3.5% of encounters, respectively. Overall stage was associated with encounter volume, with higher encounter volume with increasing stage (stages 0: 27.4 vs I: 28.5 vs II: 48.4 vs III: 61.1 vs IV: 80.8 mean encounters). Body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 0.22), adjuvant radiation (OR, 6.8), and receipt of breast reconstruction (OR, 3.5) were also associated with higher encounter volume (all P 's < 0.01). Duration of encounter volume varied by treatment phases, with medical oncology and plastic surgery sustaining high clinical encounter volume 3 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Encounter utilization in breast cancer care persists 3 years after index diagnosis and is influenced by overall stage and treatment characteristics, including receipt of breast reconstruction. These results may inform the design of episode durations within value-based models and institutional resource allocation for breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R Sergesketter
- From the Division of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Lily R Mundy
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Ronnie L Shammas
- From the Division of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Hannah C Langdell
- From the Division of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | - Scott T Hollenbeck
- From the Division of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yang S, Yu L, Zhang C, Xu M, Tian Q, Cui X, Liu Y, Yu S, Cao M, Zhang W. Effects of decision aids on breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:1025-1044. [PMID: 35460127 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate the effects of decision aids for women facing breast reconstruction decision on decision conflict, decision regret, knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and depression. BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction decision is not good or bad and should be guided by clinical evidence and patient preferences. Decision aids can increase the patient's decision-making enthusiasm and ability, improve the quality of decision and promote shared decision-making between patients and medical staff. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Eight databases were conducted from the establishment of the database until October 2021. The PRISMA checklist was selected for analysis in this paper. The meta-analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.3. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The result is decision conflict, decision regret, knowledge and other secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted. RESULTS A total of twelve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that decision aids could significantly reduce decision conflict and decision regret, improve knowledge, satisfaction and depression and had no influence on anxiety. CONCLUSIONS The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the positive effect of decision aids on the decision-making of women facing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. In the future, more well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the effects of decision aids on the decision-making of breast reconstruction and nurses should be encouraged to take part in the development of decision aids in accordance with strict standards and apply them to breast cancer patients considering postmastectomy breast reconstruction. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Our study provides evidence for the effectiveness of decision aids on breast reconstruction and points to the important role of healthcare providers in the use of decision aids and in facilitating shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Yang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lin Yu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Chunmiao Zhang
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Mengmeng Xu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qi Tian
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xuan Cui
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yantong Liu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shuanghan Yu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Minglu Cao
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ochoa O, Chrysopoulo MT. Preoperative Assessment of the Breast Reconstruction Patient. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50:201-210. [PMID: 36813398 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Through a multidisciplinary approach, as well as, a nuanced appreciation of patient goals and setting appropriate expectations, breast reconstruction can significantly improve the quality of life following mastectomy. A thorough review of the patient medical and surgical history in addition to oncologic treatments will facilitate discussion and recommendations for an individualized shared decision-making reconstructive process. Alloplastic reconstruction, although a highly popular modality, has important limitations. On the contrary, autologous reconstruction is more flexible but requires more thorough consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Ochoa
- PRMA Plastic Surgery, 9635 Huebner Road, San Antonio, TX 78240, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chettri SR, Pignone MP, Deal AM, Sepucha KR, Blizard LB, Huh R, Liu YJ, Ubel PA, Lee CN. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Does the Quality of Decisions Matter? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1891-1900. [PMID: 36437408 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12785-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how the quality of decisions influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that higher decision quality for breast reconstruction would be independently associated with better PROs. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Patients were enrolled before surgery and followed for 18 months. We used BREAST-Q scales to measure PROs and linear regression models to explore the relationship between decision quality (based on knowledge and preference concordance) and PROs. Final models were adjusted for baseline BREAST-Q score, radiation, chemotherapy, and major complications. RESULTS The cohort included 101 patients who completed baseline and 18-month surveys. Breast reconstruction was independently associated with higher satisfaction with breasts (β = 20.2, p = 0.0002), psychosocial well-being (β = 14.4, p = 0.006), and sexual well-being (β = 15.7, p = 0.007), but not physical well-being. Patients who made a high-quality decision had similar PROs as patients who did not. Among patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction, higher decision quality was associated with lower psychosocial well-being (β = -14.2, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Breast reconstruction was associated with better PROs in some but not all domains. Overall, making a high-quality decision was not associated with better PROs. However, patients who did not have reconstruction had a trend toward better well-being after making a high-quality decision, whereas patients who did have reconstruction had poorer well-being after making a high-quality decision. Additional research on the relationship between decision quality and PROs is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibani R Chettri
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael P Pignone
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Karen R Sepucha
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lillian B Blizard
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruth Huh
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Peter A Ubel
- Fuqua Business School, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Clara N Lee
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA. .,The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jonczyk MM, Homsy C, Naber S, Chatterjee A. Examining a decade of racial disparity in partial mastectomy and oncoplastic surgery. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:541-549. [PMID: 36507913 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Understanding racial disparity is crucial to addressing health equity and access to care. Our study aims to examine racial differences in breast conserving surgery (BCS) utilization rates and determine how these rates have changed over time. METHODS This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the NSQIP database to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent BCS procedures between 2008 and 2019. Racial utilization trends were analyzed using a Cochran-Armitage test and Index of Disparity analysis. RESULTS In the 12-year period, 202 492 women underwent a breast cancer surgery, of which 47% underwent BCS. Within the BCS subgroup, oncoplastic surgery utilization increased from 3% to 10%, leading to a declining proportion of partial mastectomies: 97% to 90.0% (both p < 0.01). The racial index of disparity for overall BCS patients decreased from 7% to 6%, remained unchanged (1%) for partial mastectomies, and significantly decreased in oncoplastics (23%-7.6%). CONCLUSION BCS represents a mainstay option for early-staged breast cancer interventions, this study demonstrate promising progress in decreasing the index of disparity among races and persistent racial inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Jonczyk
- Department of General Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Homsy
- Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen Naber
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Doren EL, Park K, Olson J. Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: A systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework. Am J Surg 2023:S0002-9610(23)00013-2. [PMID: 36707301 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review assesses racial disparities for African American (AA) women in breast reconstruction following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. METHODS Four databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and September 2021. RESULTS Out of 917 screened articles, 61 were included. The most common metrics were breast reconstruction rates (57.4%) and clinical outcomes (14.8%). Pooled reconstruction rates were 45.7% in white and 38.5% in AA women. 95.1% of studies found disparities in breast reconstruction rates. The greatest influencers on reconstruction rates were individual interactions in the healthcare system (54%), sociocultural environment (39%), behavioral factors (31%), and community interactions with the healthcare system (36%). CONCLUSION Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist. Focusing on implicit bias, communication barriers and infrastructure are the most promising strategies to create equitable access to breast reconstruction for AA women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Doren
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 1155 N Mayfair Rd, Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Kelley Park
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 1155 N Mayfair Rd, Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Jessica Olson
- Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
10-year oncological outcome report after second conservative treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor event. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:71-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
21
|
Which Factors Are Important to Women When Choosing a Breast Reconstruction Surgeon? Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:38-45. [PMID: 35499575 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women undergoing breast reconstruction often research their health care provider options. The authors studied which factors may influence how a woman selects a plastic surgeon for breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS An online survey was distributed by means of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk; Amazon Web Services, Inc., Seattle, Wash.) to 1025 adult women. Participants were asked to imagine a scenario in which they had breast cancer, needed to undergo mastectomy, and were choosing a reconstructive surgeon. They were then asked to rank factors influencing this decision on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Two-sample t tests were used to compare Likert scores between dichotomized categories based on participant characteristics. RESULTS Women assigned the highest scores [mean (standard deviation)] to online reviews on Vitals or WebMD [6.1 (1.2)], years of experience [5.7 (1.4)], recommendations from another surgeon [5.7 (1.3)] or family/friend [4.9 (1.7)], and attending a top medical school [4.7 (1.7)]. Lowest ranked factors were online advertising and surgeon demographics, including having a sex concordant (female) surgeon. After amalgamation into attribute subsections, mean (standard deviation) rated relative importance of surgeon reputation [0.72 (0.13)] was higher than that of appearance [0.46 (0.19)] and demographics [0.31 (0.13)]. Patient demographics influenced relative importance of certain attributes; older, educated, and higher-income patients placed higher value on surgeon appearance (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS When selecting a breast reconstruction surgeon, women place the highest value on surgeons' online, educational, and personal reputations. Though most show no strong preferences for surgeon demographics or physical attributes, specific features may be important for some patients. Cognizance of these preferences may enable providers to more effectively understand patient expectations.
Collapse
|
22
|
Yehia ZA, Punglia RS, Wong J. Integration of Radiation and Reconstruction After Mastectomy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:237-244. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
23
|
A Comparison of Complications in Therapeutic versus Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Reconstruction: A Paired Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149:1037-1047. [PMID: 35245238 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although breast reconstruction after bilateral mastectomies including a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is known to have a higher overall complication profile, whether reconstructive complication rates differ between the therapeutic mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy sides remains unclear. METHODS Women undergoing bilateral mastectomies with autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction for a unilateral breast cancer at a single institution were identified (2009 to 2019). Postoperative complications were stratified by laterality (therapeutic mastectomy versus contralateral prophylactic mastectomy). Paired data were analyzed to compare the risks of complications between prophylactic and therapeutic reconstruction sides in the same patient. RESULTS A total of 130 patients (260 reconstructions) underwent bilateral autologous or implant-based reconstruction. Although most women underwent a simple mastectomy, a higher proportion of therapeutic mastectomies were modified radical mastectomies including axillary lymph node dissections compared to contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (15.4 percent versus 0 percent). Forty-four percent of women completed postmastectomy radiation therapy of the therapeutic side before definitive reconstruction. Overall, both therapeutic and prophylactic reconstructions had a similar incidence of reconstructive failure (p = 0.57), return to the operating room (p = 0.44), mastectomy skin flap necrosis (p = 0.32), seroma (p = 0.82), fat necrosis (p = 0.16), wound infection (p = 0.56), and cellulitis (p = 0.56). Nearly one-fifth of patients experienced complications limited to the prophylactic side [contralateral prophylactic mastectomy reconstruction complications, n = 26 (20.0 percent); therapeutic mastectomy reconstruction complications, n = 15 (11.5 percent)]. CONCLUSION Despite a history of local radiation therapy and more extensive oncologic surgery on the therapeutic side, there are no significant differences in the incidence of postsurgical complications on the therapeutic mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy sides after bilateral reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, II.
Collapse
|
24
|
Fang SY, Lin PJ, Kuo YL. Long-Term Effectiveness of a Decision Support App (Pink Journey) for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e31092. [PMID: 34890354 PMCID: PMC8709911 DOI: 10.2196/31092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Various kinds of breast reconstruction (BR) options, including implants and autologous, and surgery techniques, including traditional and endoscope assisted, can be used to perform surgery. All options have their own advantages and disadvantages. Women decide on an option depending on the values and preferences they emphasize. Lacking knowledge about BR or having decision difficulties during the treatment decision process makes women experience more decision regret, psychological distress, and poor body image. Delivering decision support with a values clarification exercise using eHealth approaches would be beneficial for patient outcomes. Objective This study aims to examine the effects of a decision support app on decision-making quality and psychological morbidity for women considering BR surgery. Methods This randomized controlled trial included women who were over 20 years of age and were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and candidates for mastectomy. Women having an option for breast conservation were excluded. After being referred from the outpatient physician, the women provided consent and completed the baseline assessment. Women allocated to the control group (CG) received usual care and were provided with a pamphlet with information about types of surgery and the advantages and disadvantages of different surgery types. Women allocated to the intervention group (IG) were given the same pamphlet and guided to use the Pink Journey app to support their decision. Then they were also prompted to discuss the opinions with their significant others. Finally, the decision-making process of using the app was printed out for women that they could take home. Decision conflict, anxiety, and depression were measured at baseline. At 1 week after the intervention (T1) and at 1 month (T2), 8 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) after surgery, the women completed decision conflict, decision regret, anxiety, depression, and body image scales. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Results From February 2018 to July 2019, 96 women were randomly assigned to the CG (n=48) or the IG (n=48). Results revealed that body image distress declined significantly for the IG but increased for the CG. The interaction of time and group also reached significance, indicating a significant decrease in body image distress from baseline in the IG compared with the CG after the 12th month (T4) follow-up (β=–2.25, standard error=1.01, P=.027). However, there was no significant difference in decision conflict (P=.21-.87), decision regret (P=.44-.55), anxiety (P=.26-.33), and depression (P=.20-.75), indicating that the decrease in these outcomes in the IG was not greater than those in the CG. Conclusions Although we found no effect on decision conflict, decision regret, anxiety, and depression, a decision aid that combines surgery information and values clarification can help women reduce their body image distress. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04190992; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04190992
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su-Ying Fang
- Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Pin-Jun Lin
- Department of Nursing, DaYeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Lung Kuo
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Paraskeva N, Tollow P, Clarke A, White P, Powell JE, Cox DM, Harcourt DM. A multi-centred sequential trial comparing PEGASUS, an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with usual care. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 75:1342-1351. [PMID: 34924325 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Decision making about breast reconstruction (BR) is complex. The Patients' Expectations and Goals: Assisting Shared Understanding of Surgery (PEGASUS) intervention aims to support shared decision making by helping women and clinicians clarify and discuss their expectations around reconstructive surgery. We conducted a multi-centred sequential trial comparing PEGASUS (n = 52) with usual care (UC) (n = 86) in women considering reconstruction, who completed outcome measures at baseline, and 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. The primary outcome was BR-specific quality of life (Breast-Q) 6 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), capabilities (ICECAP-A) and decisional regret, compared using t-tests and Cohen's d. Comparative analyses revealed no significant differences between groups in Breast-Q scores at any time point, except for a favourable effect for UC on psychological well-being at 3 months (t = -2.41, p = .019, d= -0.59). Intervention participants reported significantly higher, therefore improved, ICECAP-A (t = -2.13, p = .037, d = -0.45) and EQ VAS (t = -2.28, p = .026, d = -0.49) scores at 12 months compared to UC. Decisional regret was significantly lower in the PEGASUS group compared to the UC group at 6 months (t =2.06, p = .044, d= -0.51), but this was not sustained at 12 months. In conclusion, the PEGASUS intervention offers some benefits to women considering BR. At times, women experienced less decisional regret, improved health-related quality of life and capability well-being. Findings are discussed in the light of fidelity testing and embedding PEGASUS into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Paraskeva
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - P Tollow
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - A Clarke
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - P White
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - J E Powell
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - D M Cox
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - D M Harcourt
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ter Stege JA, Raphael DB, Oldenburg HSA, van Huizum MA, van Duijnhoven FH, Hahn DEE, The R, Karssen K, Corten EML, Krabbe-Timmerman IS, Huikeshoven M, Ruhé QPQ, Kimmings NAN, Maarse W, Sherman KA, Witkamp AJ, Woerdeman LAE, Bleiker EMA. Development of a patient decision aid for patients with breast cancer who consider immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Health Expect 2021; 25:232-244. [PMID: 34708487 PMCID: PMC8849254 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (pDA) that could support patients with breast cancer (BC) in making an informed decision about breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy. Methods The development included four stages: (i) Establishment of a multidisciplinary team; (ii) Needs assessment consisting of semi‐structured interviews in patients and a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs); (iii) Creation of content, design and technical system; and (iv) Acceptability and usability testing using a think‐aloud approach in patients and interviews among HCPs and representatives of the Dutch Breast Cancer Patient Organization. Results From the needs assessment, three themes were identified: Challenging period to make a decision, Diverse motivations for a personal decision and Information needed to make a decision about BR. HCPs valued the development of a pDA, especially to prepare patients for consultation. The pDA that was developed contained three parts: first, a consultation sheet for oncological breast surgeons to introduce the choice; second, an online tool including an overview of reconstructive options, the pros and cons of each option, information on the consequences of each option for daily life, exercises to clarify personal values and patient stories; and third, a summary sheet with patients’ values, preferences and questions to help inform and guide the discussion between the patient and her plastic surgeon. The pDA was perceived to be informative, helpful and easy to use by patients and HCPs. Conclusion Consistent with information needs, a pDA was developed to support patients with BC who consider immediate BR in making an informed decision together with their plastic surgeon. Patient or Public Contribution Patients participated in the needs assessment and in acceptability and usability testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline A Ter Stege
- Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela B Raphael
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine A van Huizum
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniela E E Hahn
- Psychosocial Counseling, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Eveline M L Corten
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Menno Huikeshoven
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Quinten P Q Ruhé
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wies Maarse
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kerry A Sherman
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A E Woerdeman
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Giunta S, Laidsaar-Powell R, Huang L, Hatcher N, Dhillon H, Muscat DM, Carroll S, McNeil C, Burke L, Howson P, Chan B, Juraskova I. Considering the type and timing of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Qualitative insights into women's decision-making. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 54:102024. [PMID: 34536790 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The information women receive about the type and timing of breast reconstruction (BR) from healthcare providers is crucial to help them make an informed decision, and this is particularly important in complex cases and/or high-risk cases. This study sought to provide qualitative insights into Australian women's BR decision-making experiences. METHOD Twenty-nine women who had received a mastectomy and made decisions about BR, including the type (expander, implant and/or autologous) and timing (immediate, delayed or immediate-delayed), participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Interviews were analysed thematically using the Framework method. RESULTS Seven themes were identified: 1) information provision and needs; 2) values and preferences; 3) pressure to decide; 4) feasibility (e.g. clinical and/or financial factors); 5) social influence and support; 6) multidisciplinary team and organisational structures; and 7) decision implementation and outcomes. Breast care nurse support, as well as collaboration and communication within multidisciplinary teams were perceived by women as facilitating the BR decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS The identified themes offer an in-depth explanation of how a sample of Australian women make BR decisions. The current findings highlight the often limited clinician-patient information-sharing and demonstrate the overarching influence of the multidisciplinary medical team and organisational structures on BR decision-making. Development of in-consult decision-aids and strategies to improve multidisciplinary care are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Giunta
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lorna Huang
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
| | - Natasha Hatcher
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana Dhillon
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Susan Carroll
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Medical School, NSW, Australia; Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Catriona McNeil
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Medical School, NSW, Australia; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Lucinda Burke
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Medical School, NSW, Australia; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Pamela Howson
- Strathfield Private Hospital, Strathfield, NSW, Australia
| | - Belinda Chan
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Strathfield Private Hospital, Strathfield, NSW, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shammas RL, Fish LJ, Sergesketter AR, Offodile AC, Phillips BT, Oshima S, Lee CN, Hollenbeck ST, Greenup RA. Dissatisfaction After Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed-Methods Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1109-1119. [PMID: 34460034 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10720-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction is associated with improved patient well-being after mastectomy; however, factors that contribute to post-surgical dissatisfaction remain poorly characterized. METHODS Adult women who underwent post-mastectomy implant-based or autologous breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their lived experiences with reconstructive care. Participants completed the BREAST-Q, and tabulated scores were used to dichotomize patient-reported outcomes as satisfied or dissatisfied (high or low) for each BREAST-Q domain. A convergent mixed-methods analysis was used to evaluate interviews for content related to satisfaction or dissatisfaction with breast reconstruction. RESULTS Overall, we interviewed 21 women and identified 17 subcodes that corresponded with the five BREAST-Q domains. Sources of dissatisfaction were found to be related to the following domains: (a) low breast satisfaction due to asymmetry, cup size, and lack of sensation and physical feeling (n = 8, 38%); (b) poor sexual well-being due to shape, look and feel (n = 7, 78% [of 9 who discussed sexual well-being]); (c) reduced physical well-being of the chest due to persistent pain and weakness (n = 11, 52%); (d) reduced abdominal well-being due to changes in abdominal strength, numbness, and posture (n = 6, 38% [of 16 who underwent abdominally based reconstruction]); and (e) low psychosocial well-being impacted by an unexpected appearance that negatively influenced self-confidence and self-identity (n = 13, 62%). CONCLUSION Patients may be unprepared for the physical, sexual, and psychosocial outcomes of breast reconstruction. Targeted strategies to improve preoperative education and shared decision making are needed to mitigate unexpectedness associated with breast reconstruction and related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie L Shammas
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura J Fish
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda R Sergesketter
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Anaeze C Offodile
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brett T Phillips
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sachi Oshima
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Clara N Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Scott T Hollenbeck
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Section Chief of Breast Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, DUMC 3513, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Understanding the Relationship between Breast Reconstruction Subtype and Risk of Financial Toxicity: A Single-Institution Pilot Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:1e-11e. [PMID: 34181599 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of breast reconstruction on financial toxicity remains poorly understood despite growing awareness. The authors sought to illustrate the relationship between breast reconstruction subtypes and the risk of financial toxicity. METHODS The authors conducted a single-institution cross-sectional survey of all female breast cancer patients undergoing any form of breast reconstruction between January of 2018 and June of 2019. Financial toxicity was measured by means of the validated Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity instrument. Demographics, clinical course, and coping strategies were abstracted from a purpose-built survey and electronic medical records. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify associations with financial toxicity. RESULTS The authors' analytical sample was 350 patients. One hundred eighty-four (52.6 percent) underwent oncoplastic reconstruction, 126 (36 percent) underwent implant-based reconstruction, and 40 (11.4 percent) underwent autologous reconstruction. Oncoplastic reconstruction recipients were older, had a higher body mass index, and were more likely to have supplemental insurance and receive adjuvant hormonal therapy. No significant differences in the risk of financial toxicity were uncovered across breast reconstruction subtypes (p = 0.53). Protective factors against financial toxicity were use of supplemental insurance (p = 0.0003) and escalating annual household income greater than $40,000 (p < 0.0001). Receipt of radiation therapy was positively associated with worsening financial toxicity (-2.69; 95 CI percent, -5.22 to -0.15). Financial coping strategies were prevalent across breast reconstruction subtypes. CONCLUSIONS Breast reconstruction subtype does not differentially impact the risk of financial toxicity. Increasing income and supplemental insurance were found to be protective, whereas receipt of radiation therapy was positively associated with financial toxicity. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to identify the main drivers of out-of-pocket costs and financial toxicity in breast cancer care.
Collapse
|
30
|
Park EY, Yi M, Kim HS, Kim H. A Decision Tree Model for Breast Reconstruction of Women with Breast Cancer: A Mixed Method Approach. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18073579. [PMID: 33808263 PMCID: PMC8036358 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The number of breast reconstructions following mastectomy has increased significantly during the last decades, but women are experiencing a number of conflicts with breast reconstruction decisions. The aim of this study was to develop a decision tree model of breast reconstruction and to examine its predictability. Mixed method design using ethnographic decision tree modeling was used. In the qualitative stage, data were collected using individual and focus group interviews and analyzed to construct a decision tree model. In the quantitative stage, the questionnaire was developed questions based on the criteria identified in the qualitative stage. A total of 61 women with breast cancer participated in 2017. Five major criteria: recovery of body image; impact on recurrence; recommendations from others; financial resources; and confirmation by physicians. The model also included nine predictive pathways. It turns out that the model predicted 90% of decisions concerning whether or not to have breast reconstruction. The findings indicate that the five criteria play a key role in decision-making about whether or not to have breast reconstruction. Thus, more comprehensive issues, including these five criteria, need to be integrated into an intervention for women with breast cancer to make their best decision on breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Park
- College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea;
| | - Myungsun Yi
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Hye Sook Kim
- Department of Nursing, Suwon Science College, Suwon 18516, Korea;
| | - Haejin Kim
- Department of Nursing, Suwon Women’s University, Suwon 16632, Korea
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Connors SK, Leal IM, Nitturi V, Iwundu CN, Maza V, Reyes S, Acquati C, Reitzel LR. Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions. Am J Health Behav 2021; 45:352-370. [PMID: 33888195 PMCID: PMC8383809 DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.45.2.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Breast reconstruction (BR) potentially can improve quality of life in postmastectomy breast cancer survivors (BCS); however, African-American women are less likely to undergo BR than Caucasian women. This qualitative study was undertaken to explore individual, sociocultural, and contextual factors influencing African-American women's BR decision-making processes and preferences. Methods: Postmastectomy African-American BCS with and without BR participated in semi-structured interviews. We adopted a grounded theory approach using the constant comparison method to understand the contexts and processes informing participants' BR decision-making. Results: Twenty-three women participated, of whom 17 elected BR and 6 did not. Whereas women's primary reasons for deciding for or against BR differed, our core category, "empowered choices ," describes both groups' decision-making as a process focused on empowering themselves physically and/or psychologically, through self-advocacy, informed and shared decision-making, and giving back/receiving communal and spiritual support from church and African-American survivor groups. Socioeconomic factors influenced women's access to BR. Women preferred autologous BR and expressed the need for greater culturally-matched resources and support to inform treatment and shared BR decision-making. Conclusions: Understanding and supporting African-American women's BR preferences and empowerment is essential to ensuring equal access, and culturally-relevant, high-quality, and informed patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahnjayla K Connors
- Shahnjayla K. Connors, Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Isabel Martinez Leal
- Isabel Martinez Leal, Research Associate II, Social and Behavioral Science, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States;,
| | - Vijay Nitturi
- Vijay Nitturi, Research Assistant, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Chisom N Iwundu
- Chisom N. Iwundu, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological Health and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Valentina Maza
- Valentina Maza, Research Assistant, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University, Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stacey Reyes
- Stacey Reyes, Research Assistant, Department of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Chiara Acquati, Assistant Professor, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lorraine R Reitzel
- Lorraine R. Reitzel, Professor, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Oshima SM, Tait SD, Rushing C, Lane W, Hyslop T, Offodile AC, Wheeler SB, Zafar SY, Greenup R, Fish LJ. Patient Perspectives on the Financial Costs and Burdens of Breast Cancer Surgery. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e872-e881. [PMID: 33566677 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although financial toxicity is a well-documented aspect of cancer care, little is known about how patients narratively characterize financial experiences related to breast cancer treatment. We sought to examine these patient experiences through mixed methods analysis. METHODS Women (≥ 18 years old) with a history of breast cancer were recruited from the Love Research Army and Sisters Network to complete an 88-item electronic survey including an open-ended response. Quantitative data were used to sort and stratify responses to the open-ended question, which comprised the qualitative data evaluated here. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to evaluate the financial costs and other burdens resulting from breast cancer surgery. RESULTS In total, 511 respondents completed the survey in its entirety and wrote an open-ended response. Participants reported significant financial burden in different categories including direct payments for medical care and indirect costs such as lost wages and travel expenses. Treatment-related costs burdened participants for years after diagnosis, forming a financial arc for many participants. Discrepancies existed between the degree of financial burden reported on multiple-choice questions and participants' corresponding open-ended descriptions of financial burden. Participants described a lack of communication surrounding costs with their providers and difficulty negotiating payments with insurance. CONCLUSION Breast cancer care can result in ongoing financial burden years after diagnosis among all patients, even those with adequate insurance patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christel Rushing
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Whitney Lane
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Anaeze C Offodile
- Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global and Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Rachel Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Laura J Fish
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Behavioral Health and Survey Research Core, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Singh T, Goparaju L, Giladi AM, Aliu O, Song DH, Fan KL. Perspectives of Women Who Forgo Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed Methods Analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3203. [PMID: 33680631 PMCID: PMC7929531 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Despite a growing body of evidence suggesting improved psychosocial well-being and survival after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR), rates remain stagnant at approximately 40%. Although PMBR access and utilization have been well reported, there is much less known from the point of view of women who decide not to undergo PMBR. This study uses a mixed methods approach to fill that gap by investigating the patient-level decisions that lead to foregoing PMBR. METHODS A concurrent triangulation model under mixed methods research (MMR) was employed using in-depth qualitative interviews and the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached and were analyzed using iterative methodologies under the grounded-theory framework. Reliability checks included inter-rater reliability using Cohen's kappa statistic (mean kappa = 0.99) and triangulation. RESULTS Interviews with 8 patients who declined PMBR revealed (1) lack of trust in plastic surgeons; (2) reliance on self-developed support; (3) desire to resume normal life; (4) perceived lack of equivalency between reconstructed and natural breasts. Concurrent triangulation between the data revealed dissonance between the BREAST-Q scores for psychosocial well-being and reported levels of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Women in this study highlighted certain deficits in the current pathway to reconstruction: lack of trust, resources, and counseling. Such feelings of suspicion and reported opposition to PMBR are at odds with low scores for satisfaction with breasts and sexual well-being. These findings can be used to guide efforts that engender confidence, provide support, empower vulnerable patient groups, and increase utilization of PMBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanvee Singh
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Aviram M. Giladi
- Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Oluseyi Aliu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - David H. Song
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| | - Kenneth L. Fan
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rocco N, Catanuto G, Chiodini P, Rispoli C, Nava MB. Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Rocco
- G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; Naples Italy
| | - Giuseppe Catanuto
- Multidisciplinary Breast Unit; Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro; Catania Italy
- G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; Catania Italy
| | - Paolo Chiodini
- Physical and Mental Health; University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"; Napoli Italy
| | | | - Maurizio B Nava
- G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hannoun-Levi JM, Gal J, Van Limbergen E, Chand ME, Schiappa R, Smanyko V, Kauer-Domer D, Pasquier D, Lemanski C, Racadot S, Houvenaeghel G, Guix B, Belliere-Calandry A, Loessl K, Polat B, Gutierrez C, Galalae R, Polgar C, Strnad V. Salvage Mastectomy Versus Second Conservative Treatment for Second Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Event: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis of the GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group Database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 110:452-461. [PMID: 33383125 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Second conservative treatment has emerged as an option for patients with a second ipsilateral breast tumor event after conserving surgery and breast irradiation. We aimed to address the lack of evidence regarding second breast event treatment by comparing oncologic outcomes after conservative treatment or mastectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a propensity score-matched cohort analysis study on patients who received a diagnosis of a second breast event between January 1995 and June 2017. Patient data were collected from 15 hospitals/cancer centers in 7 European countries. Patients were offered mastectomy or lumpectomy plus brachytherapy. Propensity scores were calculated with logistic regression and multiple imputations. Matching (1:1) was achieved using the nearest neighbor method, including 10 clinical/pathologic data related to the second breast event. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival from the salvage surgery date. Secondary endpoints were 5-year cumulative incidence of third breast event, regional relapse and distant metastasis, and disease-free and specific survival. Complications and 5-year incidence of mastectomy were investigated in the conservative treatment cohort. RESULTS Among the 1327 analyzed patients (mastectomy, 945; conservative treatment, 382), 754 were matched by propensity score (mastectomy, 377; conservative treatment, 377). The median follow-up was 75.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4-83.3) and 73.8 months (95% CI, 67.5-80.8) for mastectomy and conservative treatment, respectively (P = .9). In the matched analyses, no differences in 5-year overall survival and cumulative incidence of third breast event were noted between mastectomy and conservative treatment (88% [95% CI, 83.0-90.8] vs 87% [95% CI, 82.1-90.2], P = .6 and 2.3% [95% CI, 0.7-3.9] vs 2.8% [95% CI, 0.8-4.7], P = .4, respectively). Similarly, no differences were observed for all secondary endpoints. Five-year cumulative incidence of mastectomy was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.0-5.1). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the largest matched analysis of mastectomy and conservative treatment combining lumpectomy with brachytherapy for second breast events. Compared with mastectomy, conservative treatment does not appear to be associated with any differences in terms of oncologic outcome. Consequently, conservative treatment could be considered a viable option for salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marie-Eve Chand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Viktor Smanyko
- Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Daniela Kauer-Domer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Séverine Racadot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leon Berard Cancer Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Benjamin Guix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Institute for Radiotherapy & Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Kristina Loessl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Bulent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wurzburg University, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Razvan Galalae
- MedAustron Centre for Ion Therapy and Research, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Csaba Polgar
- Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Patterns and characteristics of patients' selection of cancer surgeons. Am J Surg 2020; 221:1033-1041. [PMID: 33969822 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite evidence of volume-outcome relationships for cancer surgery, treatment at low-volume hospitals remains common. Our objective was to evaluate whether individuals actively involved in selecting their cancer surgeon were more likely to go to hospitals recognized for quality cancer care. METHODS Individuals diagnosed with breast, prostate and colorectal cancer in 2015 completed online surveys in 2017-2018. Participants were categorized as "directed" to a surgeon (relied on referral) or "active" (sought additional information), and hospitals were categorized by NCI-designation, CoC accreditation, and academic affiliation. RESULTS Of 299 participants, 42% were active. Individuals with breast cancer were more active (aOR = 2.46,95%CI:1.32-4.59). Active participants had nonsignificantly higher odds of surgery at NCI-designated facilities (aOR = 2.04,95%CI:0.95-4.38), or academic centers (aOR = 1.51,95%CI:0.86-2.64). CONCLUSIONS While most participants were directed to their cancer surgeon, active participants tended to select NCI-designated/academic hospitals. Although centralization of cancer care would require altering referral patterns, decision-support resources may help patients make informed choices.
Collapse
|
37
|
Regret and Quality of Life After Mastectomy With or Without Reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 21:162-169. [PMID: 33744100 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mastectomy represents a deep burden for women with breast cancer. Very little is known about the psychological consequences over time and the quality of life (QoL) of women so treated, with or without breast reconstruction (BR). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 709 patients underwent mastectomy with or without BR between 2002 and 2012 at one institution. Among 468 surviving patients, a 60-query QoL questionnaire on personal issues including some European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire items was presented either by email, letter, or telephone interview. RESULTS Of those questioned, 328 patients participated, whereas 140 (30%) declined the invitation or were unavailable. The median age was 63 years (range, 30-93 years). Stage I or II of disease was recorded in 73% of patients. Immediate BR was performed in 168 (51%) of 328 patients. Of the remaining patients, only 7 (4%) of 160 proceeded to delayed BR. Younger women had significantly worse Emotional Functioning and Social Functioning (SF) scores (P < .001), independently of tumor stage, and immediate BR improved that (P = .02). SF score was also worsened by chemotherapy (P = .03). Cognitive Functioning score was independent of age, BR, stage, or adjuvant therapies. Body Image and Sexual Functioning scores improved with BR (P < .03), and age was a strong co-variable (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, immediate BR was correlated with age and preoperative plastic surgery consultation. Some 68 (21%) of 328 patients regretted their decision or were disappointed with their choice regarding BR. CONCLUSIONS Younger patients with breast cancer report a worse impact on their Emotional Functioning and SF scores after mastectomy, both of which are improved by BR. Reconstructing the breast at the time of mastectomy has a significant impact on Body Image and Sexual Functioning scores. A preoperative plastic surgeon consultation improves the rate of immediate BR, whereas delayed reconstruction is rarely adopted. Some 20% of patients are disappointed in or regret their decision regarding BR. We need to improve our management in consideration of these findings.
Collapse
|
38
|
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Burn Survivors Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery in the Rehabilitative Period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146:171-182. [PMID: 32590661 PMCID: PMC9836002 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life is decreased in burn survivors, with scars implicated as a cause. The authors aim to characterize the use of reconstructive surgery following hospitalization and determine whether patient-reported outcomes change over time. The authors hypothesized improvement in health-related quality of life following reconstructive surgery. METHODS Adult burn survivors undergoing reconstructive surgery within 24 months after injury were extracted from a prospective, longitudinal database from 5 U.S. burn centers (Burn Model System). Surgery was classified by problem as follows: scar, contracture, and open wound. The authors evaluated predictors of surgery using logistic regression. Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 health survey outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months were compared at follow-up intervals and matched with nonoperated participants using propensity score matching. RESULTS Three hundred seventy-two of 1359 participants (27.4 percent) underwent one or more reconstructive operation within 24 months of injury. Factors that increased the likelihood of surgery included number of operations during index hospitalization (p < 0.001), hand (p = 0.001) and perineal involvement (p = 0.042), and range-of-motion limitation at discharge (p < 0.001). Compared to the physical component scores of peers who were not operated on, physical component scores increased for participants undergoing scar operations; however, these gains were only significant for those undergoing surgery more than 6 months after injury (p < 0.05). Matched physical component scores showed nonsignificant differences following contracture operations. Mental component scores were unchanged or lower following scar and contracture surgery. CONCLUSIONS Participants requiring more operations during index admission were more likely to undergo reconstructive surgery. There were improvements in Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 scores for those undergoing scar operations more than 6 months after injury, although contracture operations were not associated with significant differences in Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 scores.
Collapse
|
39
|
Shumway DA, Momoh AO, Sabel MS, Jagsi R. Integration of Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2329-2340. [PMID: 32442071 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dean A Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Adeyiza O Momoh
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michael S Sabel
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the BREASTChoice Tool for Personalized Decision Support About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy. Ann Surg 2020; 271:230-237. [PMID: 31305282 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a web-based breast reconstruction decision aid, BREASTChoice. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA Although postmastectomy breast reconstruction can restore quality of life and body image, its morbidity remains substantial. Many patients lack adequate knowledge to make informed choices. Decisions are often discordant with patients' preferences. METHODS Adult women with stages 0-III breast cancer considering postmastectomy breast reconstruction with no previous reconstruction were randomized to BREASTChoice or enhanced usual care (EUC). RESULTS Three hundred seventy-six patients were screened; 120 of 172 (69.8%) eligible patients enrolled. Mean age = 50.7 years (range 25-77). Most were Non-Hispanic White (86.3%) and had a college degree (64.3%). Controlling for health literacy and provider seen, BREASTChoice users had higher knowledge than those in EUC (84.6% vs. 58.2% questions correct; P < 0.001). Those using BREASTChoice were more likely to know that reconstruction typically requires more than 1 surgery, delayed reconstruction lowers one's risk, and implants may need replacement over time (all ps < 0.002). BREASTChoice compared to EUC participants also felt more confident understanding reconstruction information (P = 0.009). There were no differences between groups in decisional conflict, decision process quality, shared decision-making, quality of life, or preferences (all ps > 0.05). There were no differences in consultation length between BREASTChoice and EUC groups (mean = 29.7 vs. 30.0 minutes; P > 0.05). BREASTChoice had high usability (mean score = 6.3/7). Participants completed BREASTChoice in about 27 minutes. CONCLUSIONS BREASTChoice can improve breast reconstruction decision quality by improving patients' knowledge and providing them with personalized risk estimates. More research is needed to facilitate point-of-care decision support and examine BREASTChoice's impact on patients' decisions over time.
Collapse
|
41
|
Miseré R, Schop S, Heuts E, de Grzymala AP, van der Hulst R. Psychosocial well-being at time of diagnosis of breast cancer affects the decision whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1441-1445. [PMID: 32220543 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Numerous studies have shown that breast reconstruction after mastectomy improves QoL in breast cancer survivors. However, still about half of the patients does not opt for reconstruction. In order to accommodate suitable counseling, we should elucidate the factors that play a role in the decision-making process. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of QoL, among women diagnosed with breast cancer before the start of any treatment, on their decision whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS BREAST-Q surveys were provided to breast cancer patients at the specialized breast care outpatient clinic after their first consultation with a surgical oncologist, between June 2017 and March 2019. The Q-scores of the subdomains physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and satisfaction with breasts of patients that underwent mastectomy were statistically analyzed. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients, undergoing mastectomy, completed the questionnaire. Fifty-four percent received reconstructive surgery. Mean age of patients seeking breast reconstruction was significantly lower than patients who did not opt for a reconstruction (53.5 vs. 63.7). Mean follow-up after mastectomy was 18.1 months. Except for satisfaction with breasts, mean Q-scores were higher in the group of patients who did not choose for reconstructive surgery. Psychosocial well-being was significantly higher in the non-reconstruction group (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial well-being at time of diagnosis of breast cancer was significantly higher in patients refraining from breast reconstructive surgery after mastectomy. Psychosocial characteristics might be essential for the decision-making process as well. Further prospective research should evaluate this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Miseré
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Sander Schop
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Heuts
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Andrzej Piatkowski de Grzymala
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - René van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chu CK, Bedrosian I. Prophylactic Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00355-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
43
|
Terri Coutee: ASPS Patient of Courage, 2018. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2019; 7:e2451. [PMID: 31772884 PMCID: PMC6846302 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Mrs. Terri Coutee was selected as an American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Patient of Courage in 2018. Following successful treatment of her second breast cancer, which included a double nipple-sparing mastectomy and delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, Terri changed her career path from teaching to patient advocacy. In 2016, she launched DiepCFoundation.org, a non-profit organization that provides education, support, resources, and a community for women and men seeking information about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Today, DiepCFoundation connects patients and physicians on a global scale, fostering a shared decision-making approach to breast reconstruction.
Collapse
|
44
|
Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:891-899. [PMID: 29926096 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 253] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Importance Previous outcome studies comparing implant and autologous breast reconstruction techniques have been limited by short-term follow-up, single-center design, and a lack of rigorous patient-reported outcome data. An understanding of the expected satisfaction and breast-related quality of life associated with each type of procedure is central to the decision-making process. Objective To determine outcomes reported by patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction using implant or autologous techniques 2 years after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients were recruited from 11 centers (57 plastic surgeons) across North America for the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study, a prospective, multicenter trial, from February 1, 2012, to July 31, 2015. Women undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using implant or autologous tissue reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer treatment or prophylaxis were eligible. Overall, 2013 women (1490 implant and 523 autologous tissue reconstruction) met the inclusion criteria. All patients included in this analysis had 2 years of follow-up. Exposures Procedure type (ie, implant vs autologous tissue reconstruction). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes of interest were scores on the BREAST-Q, a validated, condition-specific, patient-reported outcome instrument, which were collected prior to and at 2 years after surgery. The following 4 domains of the BREAST-Q reconstruction module were evaluated: satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, physical well-being, and sexual well-being. Responses from each scale were summed and transformed on a 0 to 100 scale, with higher numbers representing greater satisfaction or quality of life. Results Of the 2013 women in the study (mean [SD] age, 48.1 [10.5] years for the group that underwent implant-based reconstruction and 51.6 [8.7] years for the group that underwent autologous reconstruction), 1217 (60.5%) completed questionnaires at 2 years after reconstruction. After controlling for baseline patient characteristics, patients who underwent autologous reconstruction had greater satisfaction with their breasts (difference, 7.94; 95% CI, 5.68-10.20; P < .001), psychosocial well-being (difference, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.25-5.29; P = .002), and sexual well-being (difference, 5.53; 95% CI, 2.95-8.11; P < .001) at 2 years compared with patients who underwent implant reconstruction. Conclusions and Relevance At 2 years, patients who underwent autologous reconstruction were more satisfied with their breasts and had greater psychosocial well-being and sexual well-being than did those who underwent implant reconstruction. These findings can inform patients and their clinicians about expected satisfaction and quality of life outcomes of autologous vs implant-based procedures and further support the adoption of shared decision making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine B Santosa
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor
| | - Ji Qi
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor
| | - Hyungjin M Kim
- Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Jennifer B Hamill
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor
| | - Edwin G Wilkins
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,now with the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Berlin NL, Wilkins EG, Alderman AK. Addressing Continued Disparities in Access to Breast Reconstruction on the 20th Anniversary of the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:603-604. [PMID: 29800943 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Berlin
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Edwin G Wilkins
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Amy K Alderman
- The Swan Center for Plastic Surgery, Alpharetta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA. Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 73:278-285. [PMID: 31711862 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Breast reconstruction following mastectomy can increase the quality of life of patients. Reconstruction methods can broadly be divided into implant-based and autologous tissue reconstruction. Patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction are one of the most important success parameters. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the two methods using the recognized Breast-Q questionnaire. METHODS We performed a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Meta-analysis was performed on the five most commonly reported Breast-Q modules. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies. RESULTS The search strategy resulted in 219 studies of which nine studies were included in the analysis, yielding 2129 implant-based and 825 autologous breast reconstructions. Overall satisfaction with outcome as well as breast was significantly higher among patients with autologous breast reconstructions (mean Breast-Q difference between the two groups was 9.82 [3.09, 16.54], p = 0.004, and 10.33 [95% CI 5.93, 14.74], p<0.00001, respectively). Sexual and psychosocial well-being was higher among autologous breast reconstructions. There was no difference in the physical well-being. CONCLUSION This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare patient-reported outcomes of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction. We found that autologous reconstruction yields a higher satisfaction with overall outcome and breast. These findings can aid clinicians when discussing breast reconstruction options with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tine Damsgaard
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Ahm Sørensen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using TiLoop Bra Mesh Combined With Pectoralis Major Disconnection. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 83:396-400. [PMID: 31524731 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare breast symmetry and patient satisfaction with breast appearance between implant-based breast reconstruction using TiLoop Bra mesh combined with pectoralis major disconnection (IMR) and conventional implant reconstruction (IR), and to analyze differences in complications. METHODS This retrospective study included 59 patients administered IMR or IR in 2016 to 2018. Three-dimensional scanning was performed to objectively evaluate breast symmetry. The BREAST-Q scale was used to survey satisfaction with breast appearance, social psychosocial health, physical health, and sexual well-being. RESULTS There were no significant differences in age, TNM stage, and chemotherapy between the 2 groups (all P > 0.05). In 3-dimensional scanning data, patients who underwent IMR had better bilateral breast symmetry compared with those administered IR (all P < 0.001). Based on the BREAST-Q survey, the satisfaction rate was significantly higher for IMR compared with IR (P = 0.0368), whereas psychosocial health, physical health, and sexual well-being showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > 0.05). The IMR model showed no obvious advantages in common complications, including hematoma, incision site infection, skin flap necrosis, and prosthesis exposure and rupture compared with IR; loss of skin and nipple sensations was evident in both groups. The IMR model was associated with reduced incidence of fibrous capsule contracture compared with IR (0% vs 18.75%, P = 0.0267). The incidence rates of pectoralis major disconnection syndrome after IMR and IR were 18.50% and 0%, respectively (P = 0.0161). CONCLUSIONS Patients administered IMR have better breast symmetry and greater satisfaction with breast appearance compared with those treated by IR; however, IMR has unique complications, including pectoralis major disconnection syndrome.
Collapse
|
48
|
Ter Stege JA, Woerdeman LAE, Hahn DEE, van Huizum MA, van Duijnhoven FH, Kieffer JM, Retèl VP, Sherman KA, Witkamp AJ, Oldenburg HSA, Bleiker EMA. The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:165. [PMID: 31426772 PMCID: PMC6701008 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0873-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy are candidates for breast reconstruction. Deciding about breast reconstruction is complex and the preference-sensitive nature of this decision requires an approach of shared decision making between patient and doctor. Women considering breast reconstruction have expressed a need for decision support. We developed an online patient decision aid (pDA) to support decision making in women considering immediate breast reconstruction. The primary aim of this study is to assess the impact of the pDA in reducing decisional conflict, and more generally, on the decision-making process and the decision quality. Additionally, we will investigate the pDA’s impact on health outcomes, explore predictors, and assess its cost-effectiveness. Methods A multicenter, two-armed randomized controlled trial (1:1) will be conducted. Women with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ who will undergo a mastectomy and are eligible for immediate breast reconstruction will be invited to participate. The intervention group will receive access to the online pDA, whereas the control group will receive a widely available free information leaflet on breast reconstruction. Participants will complete online questionnaires at: baseline (T0), 1 week after consultation with a plastic surgeon (T1), and 3 (T2) and 12 months (T3) after surgery. The primary outcome is decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes include other measures reflecting the decision-making process and decision quality (e.g., decision regret), patient-reported health outcomes (e.g., satisfaction with the breasts) and costs. Discussion This study will provide evidence about the impact of an online pDA for women who will undergo mastectomy and are deciding about breast reconstruction. It will contribute to the knowledge on how to optimally support women in making this difficult decision. Trial registration This study is retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03791138).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline A Ter Stege
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A E Woerdeman
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E E Hahn
- Department of Psychosocial Counseling, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine A van Huizum
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kerry A Sherman
- Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2019, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Greenup RA, Rushing C, Fish L, Campbell BM, Tolnitch L, Hyslop T, Peppercorn J, Wheeler SB, Zafar SY, Myers ER, Hwang ES. Financial Costs and Burden Related to Decisions for Breast Cancer Surgery. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:e666-e676. [PMID: 31356147 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity is a well-recognized adverse effect of cancer care, yet little is known about how women consider treatment costs when facing preference-sensitive decisions for breast cancer surgery or how surgical treatment choice affects financial harm. We sought to determine how financial costs and burden relate to decisions for breast cancer surgery. METHODS Women (≥ 18 years old) with a history of breast cancer were recruited from the Army of Women and Sisters Network to complete an 88-item electronic survey. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the impact of costs on surgical decisions and financial harm after breast cancer surgery. RESULTS A total of 607 women with stage 0 to III breast cancer were included. Most were white (90%), were insured privately (70%) or by Medicare (25%), were college educated (78%), and reported household incomes of more than $74,000 (56%). Forty-three percent underwent breast-conserving surgery, 25% underwent mastectomy, 32% underwent bilateral mastectomy, and 36% underwent breast reconstruction. Twenty-eight percent reported that costs of treatment influenced their surgical decisions, and at incomes of $45,000 per year, costs were prioritized over breast preservation or appearance. Overall, 35% reported financial burden as a result of their cancer treatment, and 78% never discussed costs with their cancer team. When compared with breast-conserving surgery, bilateral mastectomy with or without reconstruction was significantly associated with higher incurred debt, significant to catastrophic financial burden, treatment-related financial hardship, and altered employment. Among the highest incomes, 65% of women were fiscally unprepared, reporting higher-than-expected (26%) treatment costs. CONCLUSION Cancer treatment costs influenced decisions for breast cancer surgery, and comparably effective surgical treatments differed significantly in their risk of patient-reported financial burden, debt, and impact on employment. Cost transparency may inform preference-sensitive surgical decisions and improve patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Yousuf Zafar
- 1Duke University, Durham, NC.,3University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Greenup RA, Rushing CN, Fish LJ, Lane WO, Peppercorn JM, Bellavance E, Tolnitch L, Hyslop T, Myers ER, Zafar SY, Hwang ES. Perspectives on the Costs of Cancer Care: A Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3141-3151. [PMID: 31342390 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07594-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer treatment costs are not routinely addressed in shared decisions for breast cancer surgery. Thus, we sought to characterize cost awareness and communication among surgeons treating breast cancer. METHODS We conducted a self-administered, confidential electronic survey among members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons from 1 July to 15 September 2018. Questions were based on previously published or validated survey items, and assessed surgeon demographics, cost sensitivity, and communication. Descriptive summaries and cross-tabulations with Chi-square statistics were used, with exact tests where warranted, to assess findings. RESULTS Of those surveyed (N = 2293), 598 (25%) responded. Surgeons reported that 'risk of recurrence' (70%), 'appearance of the breast' (50%), and 'risks of surgery' (47%) were the most influential on patients' decisions for breast cancer surgery; 6% cited out-of-pocket costs as significant. Over half (53%) of the surgeons agreed that doctors should consider patient costs when choosing cancer treatment, yet the majority of surgeons (58%) reported 'infrequently' (43%) or 'never' (15%) considering patient costs in medical recommendations. The overwhelming majority (87%) of surgeons believed that patients should have access to the costs of their treatment before making medical decisions. Surgeons treating a higher percentage of Medicaid or uninsured patients were more likely to consistently consider costs (p < 0.001). Participants reported that insufficient knowledge or resources (61%), a perceived inability to help with costs (24%), and inadequate time (22%) impeded cost discussions. Notably, 20% of participants believed that discussing costs might impact the quality of care patients receive. CONCLUSIONS Cost transparency remains rare, however in shared decisions for breast cancer surgery, improved cost awareness by surgeons has the potential to reduce financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. .,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. .,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. .,Duke Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Christel N Rushing
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura J Fish
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Tolnitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Evan R Myers
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|