1
|
Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kölbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N, Antoniou GA, Björck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:192-331. [PMID: 38307694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy. METHODS The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence. RESULTS A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed. CONCLUSION The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mehta A, Patel P, Elmously A, Iannuzzi J, Garg K, Siracuse J, Takayama H, Schermerhorn ML, O'Donnell TFX, Patel VI. Low-volume surgeons can have better outcomes at certain hospital settings for open abdominal aortic repairs. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:638-646. [PMID: 37172621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The volume-outcomes relationship is cross-cutting among open abdominal aortic operations, where higher-volume surgeons have better perioperative outcomes. However, there has been minimal focus on low-volume surgeons and how to improve their outcomes. This study sought to identify if there are any differences in outcomes among low-volume surgeons for open abdominal aortic surgeries by different hospital settings. METHODS We used the 2012-2019 Vascular Quality Initiative registry to identify all patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery for aneurysmal or aorto-iliac occlusive disease by a low-volume surgeon (<7 operations annually). We categorized high-volume hospitals using three distinct definitions: those that performed ≥10 operations annually, those with at least one high-volume surgeon, and by the number of surgeons (1-2 surgeons, 3-4 surgeons, 5-7 surgeons, and 8+ surgeons). Outcomes included 30-day perioperative mortality, overall complications, and failure-to-rescue. We compared outcomes among low-volume surgeons using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions across each of these three hospital categorizations. RESULTS Among 14,110 patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery, 10,252 (7 3%) were performed by 1155 low-volume surgeons. Two-thirds of these patients (66%) underwent their surgery at a high-volume hospital, fewer than one-third (30%) at a hospital that had at least one high-volume surgeon, and one-half (49%) at hospitals with at least five surgeons. Among all patients operated on by low-volume surgeons, rates of 30-day mortality were 3.8%, perioperative complications were 35.3%, and failure-to-rescue were 9.9%. Low-volume surgeons operating at high-volume hospitals for aneurysmal disease had lower rates of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.90) and failure-to-rescue (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98), but similar rates of complications (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.27). Similarly, patients undergoing their operation at hospitals that had at least one high-volume surgeon had lower rates of death (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99) for aneurysmal disease. Patient outcomes among low-volume surgeons for aorto-iliac occlusive disease did not vary by hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients undergoing open abdominal aortic surgery have a low-volume surgeon, where outcomes are slightly better for those taking place at a high-volume hospital. Focused and incentivized interventions may be needed to improve outcomes among low-volume surgeons across all practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambar Mehta
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Priya Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Division of General Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Adham Elmously
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - James Iannuzzi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
| | - Karan Garg
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Hiroo Takayama
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas F X O'Donnell
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Association between Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue after Open or Endovascular Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the VASCUNET and International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Ann Surg 2021; 274:e452-e459. [PMID: 34225297 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between hospital volume and failure to rescue (FtR), after open (OAR) and endovascular (EVAR) repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) among centers participating in the VASCUNET and International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA FtR (i.e., in-hospital death following major complications) is a composite end-point representing the inability to treat complications effectively and prevent death. METHODS Using data from eight vascular registries, complication and mortality rates after intact AAA repair were examined (n = 60,273; EVAR-43,668; OAR-16,605). A restricted analysis using pooled data from four countries (Australia, Hungary, New Zealand, USA) reporting data on all postoperative complications (bleeding, stroke, cardiac, respiratory, renal, colonic ischemia) was performed to identify risk-adjusted association between hospital volume and FtR. RESULTS The most frequently reported complications were cardiac (EVAR-3.0%, OAR-8.9%) and respiratory (EVAR-1.0%, OAR-5.7%). In adjusted analysis, 4.3% of EVARs and 18.5% of OARs had at least one complication. The overall FtR rate was 10.3% after EVAR and 15.7% after OAR. Subjects treated in the highest volume centers(Q4) had 46% and 80% lower odds of FtR after EVAR (OR = 0.54; 95%CI = 0.34-0.87;p = 0.04) and OAR (OR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.11-0.44;p < 0.001) when compared to lowest volume centers(Q1), respectively. Colonic ischemia had the highest risk of FtR for both procedures (adjusted predicted risks, EVAR: 27%, 95%CI 14%-45%; OAR: 30%, 95%CI 17%-46%). CONCLUSIONS In this multi-national dataset, FtR rate after intact AAA repair with EVAR and OAR is significantly associated with hospital volume. Hospitals in the top volume quartiles achieve the lowest mortality after a complication has occurred.
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang RJ, Barakat MT, Park W, Banerjee S. Quality metrics in the performance of EUS: a population-based observational cohort of the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:68-74.e3. [PMID: 33476611 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There are few data on the quality of EUS in the community setting. We characterized EUS performance at the individual facility level in 3 large American states, using need for repeat biopsy (NRB) as a metric for procedural failure, and the rate of unplanned hospital encounters (UHEs) as a metric for adverse events. METHODS We collected data on 76,614 EUS procedures performed at 166 facilities in California, Florida, and New York (2009-2014). The endpoints for the study were 7-day rate of UHEs after EUS, and 30-day rate of NRB after EUS with fine-needle aspiration. Facility-level factors analyzed included annual procedure volume, urban/rural location, and free-standing status (facilities not attached to a larger hospital). Predictors for UHE and NRB were analyzed in both multivariable regression and nonparametric local regression. RESULTS Facility volume did not predict risk for UHEs. However, high facility volume protected against NRB (P trend <.001) even after adjustment for other facility-level factors. When regressing facility volume against risk for NRB in local regression, a join point (inflection point) was identified at 97 procedures per annum. Once facilities reached this threshold volume, there appeared little additional protective effect of higher volume. Rural facility location (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.40) and free-standing status (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.13) were also associated with NRB. CONCLUSION Facility volume does not predict risk for adverse events after EUS. However, high facility volume is associated with decreased rates of technical failure (as assessed by NRB). These data provide one of the first descriptions of EUS practice in community settings and highlight opportunities to improve endoscopic quality nationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Monique T Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Walter Park
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Subhas Banerjee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miles S, Donnellan N. Learning Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Manual Skills: An Institutional Experience With Remote Coaching and Assessment. Mil Med 2021; 187:e1281-e1285. [PMID: 33907807 PMCID: PMC8135588 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 has altered the landscape of traditional surgical education. This is a pilot study of remote coaching and assessment of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) manual skills in obstetrics and gynecology residents. Materials and Methods PGY-3 obstetrics and gynecology residents participated in remote assessment of FLS manual skills using a live streaming platform. Learners who showed deficiencies in proficiency participated in live-streamed coaching sessions. The coaching sessions continued until the learner and coach mutually agreed that the learner was prepared for the skills portion of the FLS certification exam. The primary outcome was learner performance on skills assessment with external validation through the FLS manual skills exam pass rate. Results One learner demonstrated proficiency at baseline and the remaining nine underwent remote coaching sessions. Learners received a mean of two coaching sessions to reach mutually agreed readiness for the FLS exam as per learner and coach. All residents performed significantly better at the conclusion of the remote coaching series (11.3 ± 0.82) as compared to their baseline scores (8.8 ± 2.82) (P < .03; 95% CI, 0.31-4.69). Proficiency was externally validated through the FLS exam taken by each resident 1-2 weeks following their final assessment, with all learners passing the manual portion. The average satisfaction of learners with remote coaching was 77/100 (range 50-100). 100% of learners felt prepared for their FLS certification exam and 100% would recommend this remote training program to a colleague. Conclusion Remote coaching and assessment of FLS skills yields similar results to traditional face-to-face instruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shana Miles
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Nicole Donnellan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moussa MD, Lamer A, Labreuche J, Brandt C, Mass G, Louvel P, Lecailtel S, Mesnard T, Deblauwe D, Gantois G, Nodea M, Desbordes J, Hertault A, Saddouk N, Muller C, Haulon S, Sobocinski J, Robin E. Mid-Term Survival and Risk Factors Associated With Myocardial Injury After Fenestrated and/or Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62:550-558. [PMID: 33846076 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is an independent predictor of post-operative mortality in non-cardiac surgery patients and may increase health costs. Few data are available for MINS in vascular surgery patients, in general, and those undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repairs (F/BEVAR), in particular. The incidence of MINS after F/BEVAR, the associated risk factors, and prognosis have not been determined. The aim of the present study was to help fill these knowledge gaps. METHODS A single centre, retrospective study was carried out at a high volume F/BEVAR centre in a university hospital. Adult patients who underwent F/BEVAR between October 2010 and December 2018 were included. A high sensitivity troponin T (HsTnT) assay was performed daily in the first few post-operative days. MINS was defined as a HsTnT level ≥ 14 ng/L (MINS14) or ≥ 20 ng/L (MINS20). After assessment of the incidence of MINS, survival up to two years was estimated in a Kaplan-Meier analysis and the groups were compared according to MINS status. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of MINS. RESULTS Of the 387 included patients, 240 (62.0%) had MINS14 and 166 (42.9%) had MINS20. In multivariable Cox models, both conditions were significantly associated with poor two year survival (MINS14: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 - 4.19; MINS20: aHR 2.43, 95% CI 1.36 - 4.34). In a multivariable logistic regression, age, revised cardiac risk index, duration of surgery, pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and haemoglobin level were independent predictors of MINS. CONCLUSION After F/BEVAR surgery, the incidence of MINS was particularly high, regardless of the definition considered (MINS14 or MINS20). MINS was significantly associated with poor two year survival. The modifiable predictors identified were duration of surgery, eGFR, and haemoglobin level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouhamed D Moussa
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France.
| | - Antoine Lamer
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France; Université Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, CIC-IT 1403, Lille, France; Université Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques médicales, Lille, France
| | - Julien Labreuche
- Université Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques médicales, Lille, France; Université Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Biostatistics, Lille, France
| | - Caroline Brandt
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Mass
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Paul Louvel
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Sylvain Lecailtel
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- CHU Lille, Aortic Centre, Vascular Surgery, Lille, France
| | - Delphine Deblauwe
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Gantois
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Madalina Nodea
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Jacques Desbordes
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | | | - Noredine Saddouk
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Christophe Muller
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- CHU Lille, Aortic Centre, Vascular Surgery, Lille, France; Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Université Paris Sud, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| | - Jonathan Sobocinski
- CHU Lille, Aortic Centre, Vascular Surgery, Lille, France; Université Lille, INSERM U1008, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Emmanuel Robin
- CHU Lille, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation cardiovasculaire et thoracique, pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Editor's Choice - Optimal Threshold for the Volume-Outcome Relationship After Open AAA Repair in the Endovascular Era: Analysis of the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61:747-755. [PMID: 33722485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (OAR) rates decline in the endovascular era, the endorsement of minimum volume thresholds for OAR is increasingly controversial, as this may affect credentialing and training. The purpose of this analysis was to identify an optimal centre volume threshold that is associated with the most significant mortality reduction after OAR, and to determine how this reflects contemporary practice. METHODS This was an observational study of OARs performed in 11 countries (2010 - 2016) within the International Consortium of Vascular Registry database (n = 178 302). The primary endpoint was post-operative in hospital mortality. Two different methodologies (area under the receiving operating curve optimisation and Markov chain Monte Carlo procedure) were used to determine the optimal centre volume threshold associated with the most significant mortality improvement. RESULTS In total, 154 912 (86.9%) intact and 23 390 (13.1%) ruptured AAAs were analysed. The majority (63.1%; n = 112 557) underwent endovascular repair (EVAR) (OAR 36.9%; n = 65 745). A significant inverse relationship between increasing centre volume and lower peri-operative mortality after intact and ruptured OAR was evident (p < .001) but not with EVAR. An annual centre volume of between 13 and 16 procedures per year was associated with the most significant mortality reduction after intact OAR (adjusted predicted mortality < 13 procedures/year 4.6% [95% confidence interval 4.0% - 5.2%] vs. ≥ 13 procedures/year 3.1% [95% CI 2.8% - 3.5%]). With the increasing adoption of EVAR, the mean number of OARs per centre (intact + ruptured) decreased significantly (2010 - 2013 = 35.7; 2014 - 2016 = 29.8; p < .001). Only 23% of centres (n = 240/1 065) met the ≥ 13 procedures/year volume threshold, with significant variation between nations (Germany 11%; Denmark 100%). CONCLUSION An annual centre volume of 13 - 16 OARs per year is the optimal threshold associated with the greatest mortality risk reduction after treatment of intact AAA. However, in the current endovascular era, achieving this threshold requires significant re-organisation of OAR practice delivery in many countries, and would affect provision of non-elective aortic services. Low volume centres continuing to offer OAR should aim to achieve mortality results equivalent to the high volume institution benchmark, using validated data from quality registries to track outcomes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Association between operation volume and postoperative mortality in the elective open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review. GEFÄSSCHIRURGIE 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s00772-020-00739-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundAn inverse association between the case volume per hospital and surgeon and perioperative mortality has been shown for many surgical interventions. There are numerous studies on this issue for the open treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.AimTo present the available data on the association between the case volume per hospital and surgeon and perioperative mortality in the elective open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms in a systematic review.Materials and methodsUsing the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, Current Contents Medicine (CCMed), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, a systematic search was performed using defined keywords. From the search results, all original papers were included that compared the elective open repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm in a “high volume” center with a “low volume” center or by a “high volume” surgeon with a “low volume” surgeon, as defined in the respective study.ResultsAfter deduplication, the literature search yielded 1021 hits of which 60 publications met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37/43 studies showed a lower mortality in “high volume” compared to “low volume” centers and 14/17 comparisons showed a lower mortality for “high volume” compared to “low volume” surgeons. The effect measures, usually odds ratios, ranged from 0.37 to 0.99 for volume per hospital and 0.31 to 0.92 for volume per surgeon. Regarding the threshold values for the definition of “high volume” and “low volume,” a clear heterogeneity was shown between the individual studies.DiscussionThe available data on the association between the case volume per hospital and surgeon and perioperative mortality in the elective open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms show that interventions performed in “high volume” centers or by “high volume” surgeons are associated with lower mortality. To ensure the best possible outcome in terms of low perioperative mortality in the open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms, the aim should be centralization with high case volume per hospital and surgeon.
Collapse
|
9
|
Giles KA, Stone DH, Beck AW, Huber TS, Upchurch GR, Arnaoutakis DJ, Back MR, Kubilis P, Neal D, Schermerhorn ML, Scali ST. Association of hospital volume with patient selection, risk of complications, and mortality from failure to rescue after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72:1681-1690.e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
10
|
Mohapatra A, Liang NL, Makaroun MS, Schermerhorn ML, Farber A, Eslami MH. Improved outcomes of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic injuries at higher volume institutions. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:1314-1319. [PMID: 32889071 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has significantly improved the ability to treat traumatic aortic injuries (tTEVAR). We sought to determine whether a greater center volume correlated with better outcomes. METHODS Vascular Quality Initiative data of TEVAR (2011-2017) for trauma were used in the present analysis. Using the distribution of the annual case volume at the participating centers, the sample was stratified into three terciles. In-hospital mortality at high-volume centers (HVCs) and low-volume centers (LVCs) was compared after adjustment for risk factors established in our previous Vascular Quality Initiative-based risk model containing age, gender, renal impairment, left subclavian artery involvement, and select concomitant injuries. RESULTS A total of 619 tTEVAR cases were studied across 74 centers. HVCs (n = 184 cases) had performed ≥4.9 cases annually and LVCs (n = 220 cases) had performed ≤2.4 cases annually. Both crude mortality (4.4% vs 8.6%; P = .22) and adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.09; P = .08) showed a trend toward better outcomes for tTEVAR performed at HVCs than at LVCs. The addition of center volume to our previous multivariate model significantly improved its discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.90 vs 0.88; P = .02). The overall TEVAR volume (for all indications) was not associated with increased odds of mortality for tTEVAR (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-1.20; P = .11), nor did it improve the model's discriminative ability. CONCLUSIONS Higher volume centers showed improved perioperative mortality after tTEVAR. The thoracic aortic trauma volume was more predictive than the overall TEVAR volume, suggesting that technical expertise is not the driving factor. Stable patients might benefit from transfer to a higher volume center before repair.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging
- Aorta, Thoracic/injuries
- Aorta, Thoracic/surgery
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/trends
- Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
- Endovascular Procedures/mortality
- Endovascular Procedures/trends
- Female
- Hospital Mortality/trends
- Hospitals, High-Volume/trends
- Hospitals, Low-Volume/trends
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends
- Quality Improvement/trends
- Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends
- Registries
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Factors
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
- United States
- Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging
- Vascular System Injuries/mortality
- Vascular System Injuries/surgery
- Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging
- Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality
- Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhisekh Mohapatra
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
| | - Nathan L Liang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa
| | - Michel S Makaroun
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Alik Farber
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Mohammad H Eslami
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Association between surgeon case volume and years of practice experience with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:1213-1226.e2. [PMID: 32707388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Widespread adoption of endovascular aneurysm repair has led to a consequential decline in the use of open aneurysm repair (OAR). This evolution has had significant ramifications on vascular surgery training paradigms and contemporary practice patterns among established surgeons. Despite being the subject of previous analyses, the surgical volume-outcome relationship has remained a focus of controversy. At present, little is known about the complex interaction of case volume and surgeon experience with patient selection, procedural characteristics, and postoperative complications of OAR. The purpose of the present analysis was to examine the association between surgeon annual case volume and years of practice experience with OAR. METHODS All infrarenal OARs (n = 11,900; elective, 70%; nonelective, 30%) included in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2019 were examined. Surgeon experience was defined as years in practice after training. The experience level at repair was categorized chronologically (≤5 years, n = 1667; 6-10 years, n = 1887; 11-15 years, n = 1806; ≥16 years, n = 6540). The annual case volume was determined by the number of OARs performed by the surgeon annually (median, five cases). Logistic regression was used to perform risk adjustment of the outcomes across surgeon experience and volume (five or fewer vs more than five cases annually) strata for in-hospital major complications and 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS Practice experience had no association with unadjusted mortality (30-day death: elective, P = .2; nonelective, P = .3; 1-year death: elective, P = .2; nonelective, P = .2). However, more experienced surgeons had fewer complications after elective OAR (25% with ≥16 years vs 29% with ≤5 years; P = .004). A significant linear correlation was identified between increasing surgeon experience and performance of a greater proportion of elective OAR (P-trend < .0001). Risk adjustment (area under the curve, 0.776) revealed that low-volume (five or fewer cases annually) surgeons had inferior outcomes compared with high-volume surgeons across the experience strata for all presentations. In addition, high-volume, early career surgeons (≤5 years' experience) had outcomes similar to those of older, low-volume surgeons (P > .1 for all pairwise comparisons). Early career surgeons (≤5 years) had operated on a greater proportion of elective patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥4 (35% vs 30% [≥16 years' experience]; P = .0003) and larger abdominal aortic aneurysm diameters (mean, 62 vs 59 mm [≥16 years' experience]; P < .0001) compared with all other experience categories. Similarly, the use of a suprarenal cross-clamp occurred more frequently (26% vs 22% [≥16 years' experience]; P = .0009) but the total procedure time, estimated blood loss, and renal and/or visceral ischemia times were all greater for less experienced surgeons (P-trend < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Annual case volume appeared to be more significantly associated with OAR outcomes compared with the cumulative years of practice experience. To ensure optimal OAR outcomes, mentorship strategies for "on-boarding" early career, as well as established, low-volume, aortic aneurysm repair surgeons should be considered. These findings have potential implications for widespread initiatives surrounding regulatory oversight and credentialing paradigms.
Collapse
|
12
|
Barshes NR, Uribe-Gomez A, Sharath SE, Mills JL, Rogers SO. Leg Amputations Among Texans Remote From Experienced Surgical Care. J Surg Res 2020; 250:232-238. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
13
|
Boitano LT, DeCarlo C, Schwartz MR, Tanious A, LaMuraglia GM, Conrad MF, Eagleton MJ, Schwartz SI. Surgeon specialty significantly affects outcome of asymptomatic patients after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71:1242-1252. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
14
|
Tang L, Day AT, Lee R, Gordin E, Emerick K, Patel UA, Deschler DG, Richmon JD. Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons. Am J Otolaryngol 2020; 41:102291. [PMID: 31732308 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications. METHODS The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications. RESULTS Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9%) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1%, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0%) experienced "very few" complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have "very few" complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3% had interest in a SMF training course. CONCLUSIONS Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43% of surgeons performing the SMF reported "very few" complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gamble CR, Huang Y, Frey MK, Wright JD. Caring for Patients With Uterine Cancer in Rural and Public Hospitals in New York State. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134:1260-1268. [PMID: 31764737 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate perioperative outcomes for women with uterine cancer undergoing hysterectomy at rural and public hospitals in New York State. METHODS The New York Statewide Planning And Research Cooperative System database was used to identify women with uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2000 to 2015. Perioperative complications, inpatient mortality, and resource utilization were compared at rural, public and private hospitals. Multilevel mixed effect log-linear models were developed to evaluate the association between hospital type and outcomes of interest. Patient characteristics, hospital and surgeon clustering were accounted for within the model. RESULTS Over the years studied, there were 193 hospitals that cared for 46,298 women with uterine cancer. Of these, 9.8% were public, 15.0% were rural, and 75.1% were private metropolitan. They cared for 11.0%, 2.2% and 86.8% of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients cared for at rural hospitals decreased significantly from 5.2% in 2000 to 0.6% in 2014 (P<.001). There was no change in the volume of patients cared for at public hospitals (11.3 to 10.3%, P>.05). In a multivariable model adjusting for patient risk, there were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity, transfusion and length of stay across the three hospital types (P>.05). Compared with private hospitals, treatment at a rural hospital was associated with increased inpatient mortality (adjusted risk ratio 4.03, 95% CI 1.02-15.97). CONCLUSION In New York State, operative uterine cancer care is shifting away from rural hospitals. Public hospitals have similar risk-adjusted outcomes compared with private metropolitan facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte R Gamble
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, the Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mehta HB, Yong S, Sura SD, Hughes BD, Kuo YF, Williams SB, Tyler DS, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery. Health Serv Res 2019; 54:1223-1232. [PMID: 31576566 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a claims-based comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery, and compare its performance with established comorbidity scores. DATA SOURCE Five percent Medicare data from 2007 to 2014. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years undergoing six major operations (N = 99 250). DATA COLLECTION One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. The comorbidity score was developed in the derivation cohort (70 percent sample) using logistic regression model. The comorbidity score was calibrated and validated in the validation cohort (30 percent sample), and compared against the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (CMS-HCC) comorbidity scores using c-statistic, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In the validation cohort, the surgery-specific comorbidity score was well calibrated and performed better than the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC comorbidity scores for all outcomes; the performance was comparable to the CMS-HCC for 30-day readmission. For example, the surgery-specific comorbidity score (c-statistic = 0.792; 95% CI, 0.785-0.799) had greater discrimination than the Charlson (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.739-0.755), Elixhauser (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.735-0.755), or CMS-HCC (c-statistic = 0.755; 95% CI, 0.747-0.763) scores in predicting 1-year mortality. The net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were greater for surgery-specific comorbidity score compared to the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC scores. CONCLUSIONS Compared to commonly used comorbidity measures, a surgery-specific comorbidity score better predicted outcomes in the surgical population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemalkumar B Mehta
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Shan Yong
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Sneha D Sura
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Byron D Hughes
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Taylor S Riall
- Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - James S Goodwin
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 132:1229-1237. [PMID: 30303921 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To model the effect of implementing minimum-volume standards for women who underwent hysterectomy on patient outcomes and surgeon practice patterns. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System to capture data for all women who underwent hysterectomy from 2010 to 2014. We estimated the number of hysterectomies performed by each patient's physician during the prior year. Multivariable models were used to estimate the ratio of observed to expected complications based on each surgeon's volume during the prior year. The mean observed/expected ratio of surgeons was then plotted by volume. The number of patients and surgeons who would be eliminated and the reduction in complications if minimum-volume standards (lowest fifth and 10th percentiles) were implemented were analyzed. Separate analyses were performed for each route of hysterectomy. RESULTS We identified a total of 127,202 patients. For abdominal hysterectomy, increasing surgeon volume was associated with a decreasing rate of complications (P<.001). Overall, 17.5% of surgeons (n=1,260) had a prior year volume of one abdominal hysterectomy. The mean observed/expected ratio of surgeons with a prior year abdominal hysterectomy volume of one was 1.47 (SD 2.71). Within this group of surgeons, 31.4% had an observed/expected ratio of 1 or greater, indicating a higher than expected complication rate, and 68.7% of the surgeons had a observed/expected ratio of less than 1, suggesting a lower complication rate than expected based on case mix. Selection of a prior year volume standard of one would restrict 12.5% of surgeons performing robotic-assisted, 16.8% of those performing laparoscopic, and 27.6% of surgeons performing vaginal hysterectomy. CONCLUSION Implementing minimum-volume standards for hysterectomy, for even the lowest volume physicians, would restrict a significant number of gynecologic surgeons, including many with outcomes that are better than predicted.
Collapse
|
18
|
Changes in Surgical Volume and Outcomes Over Time for Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 132:59-69. [PMID: 29889759 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine changes over time in surgeon and hospital procedural volume for hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and explore the association between changes in volume and perioperative outcomes. METHODS We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database to analyze women who underwent abdominal or minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2000 to 2014. Annualized surgeon and hospital volume was estimated. The association between surgeon and hospital volume and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization (transfusion, length of stay, hospital charges) was estimated by modeling procedural volume as a continuous and categorical variable. RESULTS A total of 44,558 women treated at 218 hospitals were identified. The number of surgeons performing cases each year decreased from 845 surgeons with 2,595 patients (mean cases=3) in 2000 to 317 surgeons who operated on 3,119 patients (mean cases=10) (P<.001) in 2014, whereas the mean hospital volume rose from 14 to 32 cases over the same time period (P=.29). When stratified by surgeon volume quartiles, the morbidity rate was 14.6% among the lowest volume surgeons, 20.8% for medium-low, 15.7% for medium-high, and 14.1% for high-volume surgeons (P<.001). In multivariable models in which volume was modeled as a continuous variable, there was no association between surgeon volume and the rate of complications, whereas excessive total charges were lowest and perioperative mortality highest for the high-volume surgeons (P<.001 for both). CONCLUSION Care of women with endometrial cancer has been concentrated to a smaller number of surgeons and hospitals. The association between surgeon and hospital volume for endometrial cancer is complex with an increased risk of adverse outcomes among medium-volume hospitals and surgeons but the lowest complication rates for the highest volume surgeons and centers.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ruiz MP, Chen L, Hou JY, Tergas AI, St Clair CM, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Outcomes of Hysterectomy Performed by Very Low-Volume Surgeons. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 131:981-990. [PMID: 29742669 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a population-based analysis to first examine the changes in surgeon and hospital procedural volume for hysterectomy over time and then to explore the association between very low surgeon procedural volume and outcomes. METHODS All women who underwent hysterectomy in New York State from 2000 to 2014 were examined. Surgeons were classified based on the average annual procedural volume as very low-volume surgeons if they performed one procedure per year. We used multivariable models to examine the association between very low-volume surgeon status and morbidity, mortality, transfusion, length of stay, and cost. RESULTS Among 434,125 women who underwent hysterectomy, very low-volume surgeons accounted for 3,197 (41.0%) of the surgeons performing the procedures and operated on 4,488 (1.0%) of the patients. The overall complication rates were 32.0% for patients treated by very low-volume surgeons compared with 9.9% for those treated by other surgeons (P<.001) (adjusted relative risk 1.97, 95% CI 1.86-2.09). Specifically, the rates of intraoperative (11.3% vs 3.1%), surgical site (15.1% vs 4.1%) and medical complications (19.5% vs 4.8%), and transfusion (38.5% vs 11.8%) were higher for very low-volume compared with higher volume surgeons (P<.001 for all). Patients treated by very low-volume surgeons were also more likely to have a prolonged length of stay (62.0% vs 22.0%) and excessive hospital charges (59.8% vs 24.6%) compared with higher volume surgeons (P<.001 for both). Mortality rate was 2.5% for very low-volume surgeons compared with 0.2% for higher volume surgeons (P<.001) (adjusted relative risk 2.89, 95% CI 2.32-3.61). CONCLUSION A substantial number of surgeons performing hysterectomy are very low-volume surgeons. Performance of hysterectomy by very low-volume surgeons is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P Ruiz
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, the Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Regionalization of care for women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154:394-400. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
21
|
Bath MF, Awopetu AI, Stather PW, Sadat U, Varty K, Hayes PD. The Impact of Operating Surgeon Experience, Supervised Trainee vs. Trained Surgeon, in Vascular Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 58:292-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
22
|
Staudt MD, Langdon KD, Hammond RR, Lownie SP. Incisional Seeding of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following Carotid Endarterectomy: An Unusual Case of an Unknown Primary Cancer Presenting as a Presumed Neck Abscess. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 17:202-207. [PMID: 30418629 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a safe and effective procedure, with a low risk of complications when performed by experienced surgeons. Postoperative infections are particularly rare, reportedly affecting less than 1% of cases. Incisional metastases have not been described. OBJECTIVE To describe a previously unreported complication, the incisional seeding of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) during neck dissection, which presented and was treated as a presumed postoperative neck abscess. METHODS Clinical records were reviewed regarding a 73-yr-old female who underwent routine CEA and presented 2 mo postoperatively with neck induration and erythema. Tissue submitted during the initial CEA was reexamined given the updated clinical history. RESULTS Postoperatively, a complex, multi-cystic fluid collection beneath the incision was identified and percutaneously drained. Although cultures were negative, an infection was favored and antibiotic therapy initiated. The patient's symptoms worsened prompting surgical exploration, and tissue sent for pathological examination was consistent with metastatic SCC. Retrospective analysis of a lymph node excised during the initial dissection also revealed tumor deposits, indicating that the surgical site had been seeded during exposure. A primary origin was not identified. CONCLUSION The time from initial presentation of postoperative complications to a final diagnosis of metastatic SCC was 2 mo, during which time the patient was treated as having a postoperative infection. Further investigations were consistent with diffuse and incurable metastatic disease. This report highlights the diagnostic challenges and potential avoidance strategies when dealing with rare complications following CEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Staudt
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristopher D Langdon
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert R Hammond
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen P Lownie
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Montgomery JR, Sung RS, Woodside KJ. Transplant Center Volume: Is Bigger Better? Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 74:432-434. [PMID: 31358310 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Randall S Sung
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huang RJ, Barakat MT, Girotra M, Lee JS, Banerjee S. Unplanned Hospital Encounters After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 3 Large North American States. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:119-129.e3. [PMID: 30243620 PMCID: PMC6309462 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We have few population-level data on the performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. We investigated the numbers of unplanned hospital encounters (UHEs), patient and facility factors associated with UHEs, and variation in quality and outcomes in the performance of ERCP in 3 large American states. METHODS We collected data on 68,642 ERCPs, performed at 635 facilities in California, Florida, and New York from 2009 through 2014. The primary endpoint was number of UHEs with an ERCP-related event within 7 days of ERCP; secondary endpoints included number of UHEs within 30 days and mortality within 30 days. Each facility was assigned a risk-standardized cohort, and variations in number of UHEs were analyzed with multivariable analysis. RESULTS Among all ERCPs, 5.8% resulted in a UHE within 7 days and 10.2% within 30 days. Performance of sphincterotomy was significantly associated with a higher risk of UHE at 7 and 30 days (P < .001). Younger age, female sex, and more advanced comorbidity were associated with UHE. There was substantial heterogeneity in rates of UHE among facilities: 4.2% at facilities in the 5th percentile and 25.2% at facilities in the 95th percentile. Increasing facility volume and ability to perform endoscopic ultrasonography were associated inversely with risk. The median number of ERCPs performed each year was 68.7, but 69% of facilities performed 100 or fewer ERCPs per year. Risk for UHE after sphincterotomy decreased with increasing facility volume until an inflection point of 157 ERCPs per year was reached. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of outcomes of 68,642 ERCPs performed in 3 states, we found a higher-than-expected number of UHEs. There is substantial unexplained variation in risk for adverse events after ERCPs among facilities, and volume is the strongest predictor of risk. Annual facility volumes above approximately 150 ERCPs per year may protect against UHE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Monique T. Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Mohit Girotra
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Jennifer S. Lee
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Subhas Banerjee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Deery SE, O'Donnell TFX, Zettervall SL, Darling JD, Shean KE, O'Malley AJ, Landon BE, Schermerhorn ML. Use of an Assistant Surgeon Does not Mitigate the Effect of Lead Surgeon Volume on Outcomes Following Open Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 55:714-719. [PMID: 29609964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND While higher lead surgeon volume has been associated with lower mortality following open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, little is known about the impact of using an attending surgeon as assistant surgeon. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of an assistant surgeon, particularly a high volume assistant, mitigates the relationship between lead surgeon volume and outcomes. METHODS All Medicare beneficiaries who underwent intact, open AAA repair between 2003 and 2008 were evaluated and nested regression models were constructed to evaluate the relationship between surgeon and assistant volume and peri-operative mortality, adjusting for comorbid conditions and hospital volume. RESULTS In total 28,590 repairs were studied, of which 19,284 (67.5%) were performed by a single surgeon and 9306 (32.5%) included an assistant surgeon. Of cases with an assistant, 12.3% included a high volume assistant surgeon. Lower volume surgeons more frequently used an assistant (lead surgeon Q1 volume: 40%; Q2: 36%; Q3: 34%; Q4: 29%; Q5: 27% [p < .01]). In cases with no assistant, adjusted peri-operative mortality varied monotonically with surgeon volume (Q1: 4.7%; Q2: 4.4%; Q3: 4.1%; Q4: 3.3%; Q5: 3.2%). However, the use of a high or a low volume assistant surgeon, compared with no attending surgeon as assistant, was not associated with lower peri-operative mortality in any lead surgeon volume quintile, even among those operations performed by the lowest volume lead surgeons. CONCLUSION Employing an assistant surgeon does not improve outcomes amongst any quintile of volume of the lead surgeon. As surgeons perform fewer open AAA repairs in the modern era, these data imply that even the help of a high volume assistant surgeon may not mitigate the detrimental effect of a lower volume surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Deery
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas F X O'Donnell
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara L Zettervall
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeremy D Darling
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katie E Shean
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A James O'Malley
- Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Bruce E Landon
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|