Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in children

Administration of G-CSF from day +6 post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents accelerates neutrophil engraftment but does not appear to have an impact on cost savings

G-CSF post-allogeneic HSCT accelerates neutrophil engraftment, but evidence that it impacts on cost-related outcomes is lacking. We performed a retrospective child and adolescent single-center cohort study examining G-CSF administration from Day +6 of allogeneic HSCT vs. ad hoc G-CSF use where clinically indicated. Forty consecutive children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic HSCT were included. End-points were as follows: time to engraftment; incidence of acute and chronic GvHD; number of patients alive at Day +100; 180-day TRM; post-transplant days in hospital; and cost of antimicrobials, TPN, and G-CSF usage. Neutrophil engraftment occurred earlier in the group that received G-CSF from Day +6. There was no difference between groups in any of the other end-points with the following exception: the cost of GCSF was significantly higher in the D + 6 G-CSF group. However, median G-CSF cost in this group amounted to only €280. There was a trend towards reduced cost of antimicrobials in the D + 6 G-CSF group, although this did not reach significance (p = 0.13). The median cost per patient of antimicrobial agents between groups differed by €1116. This study demonstrated the administration of G-CSF on Day +6 in pediatric HSCT to be safe. A further study using a larger cohort of patients is warranted to ascertain its true clinico-economic value.

Administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to recipients followed by intra-bone marrow-bone marrow transplantation accelerates acceptance of allogeneic bone marrow cells in mice

We have recently established a novel method for bone marrow transplantation: intra-bone marrow-bone marrow transplantation (IBM-BMT), by which the rapid recovery of donor-derived hematopoiesis can be expected even when reduced radiation doses are used. In this paper, we examine, using mice, whether the combination of pretreatment of recipients with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and IBM-BMT can induce a more rapid recovery of donor-derived hematopoiesis than IBM-BMT alone. We first pretreated recipients with recombinant human (rh) G-CSF (250 microg/kg/day) for 5 consecutive days (days -6 to -2). On day -1, the recipients were irradiated, and IBM-BMT was carried out on day 0. On day 12, we performed colony-forming units of spleen (CFU-S) assays. The combination of G-CSF pretreatment and IBM-BMT augmented the CFU-S counts, the weight of spleens, and the numbers of donor-derived hematopoietic cells. We next analyzed the mechanisms underlying these effects of G-CSF and found that (i) G-CSF induces Th2 polarization, which can prevent graft rejection, and (ii) G-CSF augments natural suppressor activity, which suppresses graft rejection. The combination of G-CSF pretreatment and IBM-BMT can produce the rapid recovery of donor-derived hematopoiesis and suppress graft rejection. This method would lighten the burden on patients in allogeneic BMT.

Prophylactic colony-stimulating factors in children receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are widely utilized to prevent neutropenic complications in both adults and children, but randomized controlled trials in the pediatric setting have reported varied results. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were conducted to definitively assess the impact of prophylactic CSFs on the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric oncology patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched and references hand-searched through July 2004 for randomized controlled trials of prophylactic G-CSF or GM-CSF in pediatric oncology patients. Objectives, outcomes, and quality of the 16 included studies were extracted by two reviewers. Weighted summary estimates of relative risks (RR) were calculated for FN and documented infection (DI). Mean differences in hospitalization, antibiotic use, and duration of neutropenia were calculated.

RESULTS

FN occurred in 68% of 400 controls and 59% of 404 CSF patients. The estimated RR was 0.88 [0.81-0.97; (P=0.01)] favoring the CSFs for leukemia and high grade lymphoma studies and 0.71 [0.51-0.97; (P=0.03)] for solid tumor studies. DI occurred in 25% of controls and 20% of CSF patients for an estimated RR of 0.80 [0.61-1.06; (P=0.12)]. The mean decrease in duration of neutropenia was 3.5 days [2.2-4.7; (P<0.0001)]. Mean decreases favoring CSF use were also observed for hospital stay of 1.7 days [0.9-2.5 (P<0.01)] and antibiotic use of 2.0 days [0.4-3.6; P=0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic CSFs significantly decrease the incidence of FN and the durations of severe neutropenia, hospitalization, and antibiotic use in pediatric cancer patients, but they do not significantly decrease documented infections.

Colony stimulating factors for prevention of myelosupressive therapy induced febrile neutropenia in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

BACKGROUND

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the most common cancer in childhood and febrile neutropenia is a potentially life-threatening side effect of its treatment. Current treatment consists of supportive care plus antibiotics. Clinical trials have attempted to evaluate the use of colony-stimulating factors (CSF) as additional therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia in children with ALL. The individual trials do not show whether there is significant benefit or not. Systematic review provides the most reliable assessment and the best recommendations for practice.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the addition of G-CSF or GM-CSF to myelosuppressive chemotherapy in children with ALL, in an effort to prevent the development of febrile neutropenia. Evaluation of number of febrile neutropenia episodes, length to neutrophil count recovery, incidence and length of hospitalisation, number of infectious disease episodes, incidence and length of treatment delays, side effects (flu-like syndrome, bone pain and allergic reaction), relapse and overall mortality (death).

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search covered the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, LILACS, and SciElo. We manually searched records of conference proceedings of ASCO and ASH from 1985 to 2003 as well as databases of ongoing trials. We consulted experts and scanned references from the relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CSF with placebo or no treatment as primary or secondary prophylaxis to prevent febrile neutropenia in children with ALL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected, critically appraised studies and extracted relevant data. The end points of interest were:* Primary end points: number of febrile neutropenia episodes and overall mortality (death) * Secondary end points: time to neutrophil count recovery, incidence and length of hospitalisation, number of infectious diseases episodes, incidence and length of treatment delays, side effects (flu-like syndrome, bone pain and allergic reaction) and relapse. We conducted a meta-analysis of these end points and expressed the results as Peto odds ratios. For continuous outcomes we calculated a weighted mean difference and a standardised mean difference. For count data, meta-analysis of the logarithms of the rate ratios using generic inverse variance was employed.

MAIN RESULTS

We scanned more than 5500 citations and included six studies with a total of 332 participants in the analysis. There were insufficient data to assess the effect on survival. The use of CSF significantly reduced the number of episodes of febrile neutropenia episodes (Rate Ratio = 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.85; p =0.003, with substantial heterogeneity), the length of hospitalisation (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1.58; 95% CI -3.00 to -0.15; p = 0.03), and number of infectious diseases episodes (Rate Ratio=0.44; 95%CI 0.24 to 0.80; p=0.002). In spite of these results, CSF did not influence the length of episodes of neutropenia (WMD = -1.11; 95% CI -3.55 to 1.32; p = 0.4) or delays in chemotherapy courses (Rate Ratio=0.77; 95%CI 0.49 to 1,23; p=0.28) .

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Children with ALL treated with CSF benefit from shorter hospitalisation and fewer infections. However, there was no evidence for a shortened duration of neutropenia nor fewer treatment delays, and no useful information about survival. The role of CSF regarding febrile neutropenia episodes is still uncertain. Although current data shows statistical benefit for CSF use, substantial heterogeneity between included trials does not allow this conclusion.

Granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors in allografts: Uses, misuses, misconceptions, and future applications

Despite more than 10 years experience using growth factors after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), their state in this has not been elucidated. Most studies show that they accelerate myeloid recovery, regardless of whether they are instituted on day 0 or day 10 after transplant. However, this does not correlate with an improvement in the outcome. One disadvantage is that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis is associated with slower platelet engraftment due to an increase in platelet aggregation. There is also no agreement as regards the value of G-CSF given as prophylaxis after ASCT, the effects on graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and the survival rate. A large retrospective study from Europe showed that patients with acute leukemia who received bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings and were treated with G-CSF ran a higher risk of acute and chronic GVHD and transplant-related mortality, while the survival and the leukemia-free survival rates were reduced. In contrast, a meta-analysis of 18 small studies showed no evidence of an increase in acute and chronic GVHD, using G-CSF as prophylaxis after ASCT. Two studies from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed contradictory data. When G-CSF is given to the recipient as prophylaxis, the levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor-alpha increase, which aggravates GVHD. When it is given to the donor, G-CSF polarizes T cells to produce T-helper cell-2 cytokines, which reduce GVHD after transplantation. G-CSF has no effect on relapse. Available findings suggest that there is no indication to use G-CSF as prophylaxis after ASCT.

The effect of hematopoietic growth factors on the risk of graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis

The effect of hematopoietic growth factors on neutrophil recovery after allogeneic transplantation is well-recognized. Recent laboratory studies demonstrated that these cytokines may also modify T-cell and dendritic cell function, but whether the effect is strong enough to alter the risk of GVHD is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effect of G-CSF or GM-CSF on the risk of nonhematopoietic outcomes after allogeneic transplantation. A search of the literature from 1986 to present yielded 18 publications in which data were provided for cohorts receiving growth factor vs either placebo or no therapy. These included nine prospective randomized studies, eight retrospective cohort studies, and one case-control study comprising a total of 1198 patients. The publication types were heterogeneous with regard to demographic and treatment characteristics, although within publications, comparative groups were generally balanced. The pooled risk ratio estimates with use of growth factor was 1.08 (95% CI 0.87-1.33, P=0.48) for grades 2-4 acute GVHD, 1.22 (95% CI 0.80-1.86, P=0.99) for grades 3-4 acute GVHD, and 1.02 (95% CI 0.82-1.26, P=0.87) for chronic GVHD. This analysis did not detect a significant change in the risk of acute or chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation when hematopoietic growth factors were used to shorten the initial period of neutropenia.

Clinical applications of hematopoietic growth factors in pediatric oncology

Myeloid growth factors are widely used in both pediatric and adult oncology. Although the literature supporting the use of growth factors in pediatric oncology is less extensive than the adult literature, some uses are clearly established. Both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor shorten the duration of febrile neutropenia after myelosuppressive chemotherapy, effectively mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation, and enhance neutrophil engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although some open-label, uncontrolled trials and retrospective analyses support growth factor use to ameliorate the number of infections, duration of hospitalizations, and duration of intravenous antibiotic use after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or to enhance dose intensity, randomized controlled trials supporting these practices are lacking.

Haemopoietic growth factors in paediatric oncology: a review of the literature

Recombinant haemopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are an attractive adjunct to reduce morbidity from chemotherapy regimens and their use has become widespread in paediatric oncology. Although patients receiving HGFs often have faster haematological recovery after intensive chemotherapy, this does not always translate into meaningful clinical benefits. This article reviews the clinical effectiveness of HGFs in a variety of different contexts. Most published studies have used granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as prophylaxis to ameliorate the subsequent neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy. These 2 agents have also been used to mobilise peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation. HGFs specific for anaemia and thrombocytopenia are currently in paediatric clinical trials and it is hoped that the proper context and administration strategy can be found to make their use clinically effective. This article also reviews data on toxicity, specifically focusing on differences between various formulations of growth factors. HGFs are expensive, and cost-benefit analyses reviewed in this article give an important perspective on the financial aspects of paediatric cancer care. Because HGFs do not benefit every child receiving chemotherapy and overuse increases costs and may result in unnecessary adverse effects, evidence-based guidelines for their rational use in paediatric oncology are proposed.

Factors affecting neutrophil and platelet reconstitution following T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: differential effects of growth factor type and role of CD34(+) cell dose

We have performed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the factors that affect the kinetics of neutrophil and platelet recovery in 546 recipients of T cell-depleted (TCD) marrow allografts. All patients received marrow depleted of mature CD3(+) T cells by complement-mediated lysis using T(10)B(9)-1A3 (n = 489) or Muromonab-Orthoclone OKT3 (n = 57) monoclonal antibodies. Neutrophil engraftment to 0.5 x 10(9)/1 and platelet engraftment to 20 x 10(9)/l were assessed as endpoints. Factors significantly affecting neutrophil or platelet engraftment in the univariate analysis included patient age, T cell dose, anti-thymocyte globulin use, gender, diagnosis at transplant, CMV serostatus, HLA mismatch, CD34 cell dose (n = 249), and growth factor use and type. These variables were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. The results showed that a faster rate of neutrophil engraftment was independently associated with CD34(+) cell dose > or = 5 x 10(6)/kg and most strongly with growth factor administration. Faster platelet engraftment was associated with transplantation for chronic leukemia, CD34(+) cell dose > or = 2 x 10(6)/kg, an HLA matched related donor, and the absence of growth factor use. G-CSF had a higher relative risk (RR) of enhancing neutrophil engraftment than GM-CSF and significantly delayed platelet engraftment. The combined use of G-CSF + GM-CSF was similar to G-CSF alone. The enhancing effect of G-CSF for neutrophil recovery was most striking for patients who engrafted to 0.5 x 10(9)/1 at or before day 12 (RR = 9.5, P < 0.0001) compared to patients who received no growth factor. Conversely, the delaying effect of G-CSF on platelet engraftment was strongest for patients engrafting on or before day 25 (RR = 0.4, P = 0.0004). Of the independent variables affecting engraftment kinetics in recipients of TCD marrow allografts only growth factor, and to a limited extent, CD34(+) cell dose can be controlled by the clinician. A higher CD34(+) cell dose enhances the rate of both neutrophil and platelet engraftment whereas for G-CSF the benefits of myeloid growth factor use in enhancing neutrophil recovery may be partly offset by a delay in platelet engraftment.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor support in therapy of high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to increase the dose intensity of chemotherapy and reduce the days with neutropenic fever in childhood high-risk (HR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) by systematic use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

PROCEDURE

All children with HR-ALL in Finland during 1990-1996 were included. Two open-label study groups were formed: 1) 34 children diagnosed between January, 1992, and December, 1996, received seven or nine courses (depending on cranial RT or no cranial RT) of GM-CSF at 5 microg/kg s.c. daily until an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 1,000 x 10(6)/liter at scheduled places in the protocol and 2) 80 control children, those diagnosed between January, 1990, and December, 1991, plus all with significant coexpression of myeloid markers, did not receive GM-CSF.

RESULTS

Dose intensity increased in patients who received regular GM-CSF support. The intensive phase of therapy, including induction, consolidation courses, and delayed intensification, was 33 days shorter (P < 0.001) in children with seven courses and 26 days shorter (P < 0.01) in those with nine courses of GM-CSF compared to controls. The number of infections during the whole ALL therapy was reduced by use of GM-CSF in children aged >5 years (P < 0.001), but not in those aged <5 years. The mean total duration of intravenous antibiotics per child was 39 days in the GM-CSF group and 48 days in the control group (P < 0. 001). Systematic use of GM-CSF was cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic use of GM-CSF improved dose intensity by shortening the intensive treatment period by about 4 weeks. Use of GM-CSF reduced the days for inpatient antibiotics by about 1 week per child, which translates into reduced costs.

High-dose cytarabine-containing chemotherapy with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for children with acute leukemia

We sought to determine the role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct therapy in high-dose cytarabine-containing chemotherapy (HD C/T) for children with acute leukemia. Seventeen patients, aged 9 months to 18 years old, 8 ALL and 9 AML, were treated with cytarabine (Ara-C) 1 g/m2 q12h for 8 doses with mitoxantrone, idarubicin, VP-16, or asparaginase. A total of 71 courses of HD C/T was given. G-CSF was not used in 14 courses (Group A). Prophylactic G-CSF was given in 57 courses (Group B) as 200 microg/m2/d SC started one day after the completion of HD C/T and continued until the neutrophil recovery was maintained. The incidences of sepsis per course in Group A and Group B were 35.7% (5/14) and 40.4% (23/57), respectively. While 2 patients in Group A died of sepsis or pneumonia, none in Group B died. The mortality and delay in chemotherapy were fewer in Group B (P = 0.037 and 0.0006, respectively, Fisher exact test). There was a shorter average number of days of neutrophil <500/cumm, antibiotic usage, fever, and hospital stay in Group B (11, 8, 5, 17 days in Group B vs. 21, 17, 10, 37 days in Group A; P = 0.0001, log-rank test; 0.0006, 0.0023, 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively). The incidence of neutropenic fever was lower in Group B, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06, Fisher exact test). We conclude that G-CSF as an adjunct therapy in HD C/T is effective in reducing mortality, days of neutropenia, antibiotic usage, fever, hospital stay, and frequency of delay in chemotherapy. The efficacy of this treatment approach requires further testing in a randomized, controlled trial.

Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor PO1 CA-20180ilgrastim) hastens the recovery from neutropenia after P30 CA-21765emotherapy, but its role in the management of childhood leukemia is unclear.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 164 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (age range, 2 months to 17 years) to receive placebo or G-CSF (10 microg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously), beginning one day after the completion of remission-induction therapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was greater than or equal to 1000 per cubic millimeter for two days. The clinical and laboratory effects of this therapy were documented for 21 days. The area under the plasma G-CSF concentration-time curve was measured on days 1 and 7 in both groups.

RESULTS

Responses to the growth factor could be assessed in 148 patients (73 in the G-CSF group and 75 in the placebo group). G-CSF treatment did not significantly lower the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (58 percent in the G-CSF group vs. 68 percent in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.16), increase the likelihood of event-free survival at three years (83 percent in both groups), or decrease the number of severe infections (five in the G-CSF group vs. six in the placebo group). Patients treated with G-CSF had shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 10 days, P=0.011) and fewer documented infections (12 vs. 27, P=0.009). The median total costs of supportive care were similar in the G-CSF and placebo groups ($8,768 and $8,616, respectively). Among patients who did not have febrile neutropenia during the first week of G-CSF or placebo injections, higher systemic exposure to the growth factor on day 7 was significantly related to a lower probability of subsequent hospitalization (P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF treatment had some clinical benefit in children who received induction chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but it did not reduce the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia, prolong survival, or reduce the cost of supportive care.

The potential role of NK cells in the separation of graft-versus-tumor effects from graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is being increasingly used for the treatment of a variety of cancers ranging from leukemias to breast cancer. However, significant obstacles currently limit the efficacy of this treatment procedure. The predominant two are the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse from the cancer. While regimens exist that prevent the occurrence or severity of GVHD, these same regimens also increase the rate of relapse. Conversely, most attempts to reduce the relapse rate also result in increased GVHD. The use of NK cells as an adoptive immunotherapy after BMT is attractive for several reasons. NK cells exhibit antitumor effects both in vitro and in animal models and may, therefore, promote graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects to remove minimal residual disease after allogeneic BMT. NK cells have also been shown to promote hematopoietic engraftment and donor cell reconstitution after allogeneic BMT in mice. The effects of NK cells on hematopoiesis are believed to be due to the hematopoietic growth factors they can produce after activation. Another advantage in using NK cells is that they can prevent the occurrence of GVHD after allogeneic BMT in mice. This effect is mediated at least in part by the immunosuppressive cytokine, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta). BMT studies in mice also indicate that the beneficial effects of NK cells are optimal if they are administered soon after the transplant. Thereafter, NK cells and, more importantly, IL-2, which is used to activate them, are detrimental and can exacerbate the subsequent GVHD. Thus, the use of activated NK cells after allogeneic BMT may provide GVT effects without inducing GVHD.