Update on the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam irradiation

Androgenic suppression combined with radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced prostate cancer is often associated with elevated recurrence rates. Despite the modest response observed, external-beam radiotherapy has been the preferred treatment for this condition. More recent evidence from randomised trials has demonstrated clinical benefit with the combined use of androgen suppression in such cases. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the combination of distinct hormone therapy modalities versus radiotherapy alone for overall survival, disease-free survival and toxicity.

METHODS

Databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov) were scanned for randomised clinical trials involving radiotherapy with or without androgen suppression in local prostate cancer. The search strategy included articles published until October 2011. The studies were examined and the data of interest were plotted for meta-analysis. Survival outcomes were reported as a hazard ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Data from ten trials published from 1988 to 2011 were included, comprising 6555 patients. There was a statistically significant advantage to the use of androgen suppression, in terms of both overall survival and disease free survival, when compared to radiotherapy alone. The use of long-term goserelin (up to three years) was the strategy providing the higher magnitude of clinical benefit. In contrast to goserelin, there were no trials evaluating the use of other luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues as monotherapy. Complete hormonal blockade was not shown to be superior to goserelin monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this systematic review, the evidence supports the use of androgen suppression with goserelin monotherapy as the standard treatment for patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy, which are at high risk of recurrence or metastases.

Inhibition of p21-activated kinase 6 (PAK6) increases radiosensitivity of prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

p21-activated kinase 6 (PAK6) is a serine/threonine kinase belonging to the p21-activated kinase (PAK) family. We investigated the role of PAK6 in radiation-induced cell death in human prostate cancer cells.

METHODS

We used a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) strategy to stably knock down PAK6 in PC3 and DU145 cells. Radiation sensitivities were compared in PAK6 stably knockdown cells versus the scrambled shRNA-expressing control cells.

RESULTS

PAK6 mRNA and protein levels in PC3 and DU145 cells were upregulated upon exposure to 6 Gy of radiation. After irradiation, an increased percentage of apoptotic cells and cleaved caspase-3 levels were demonstrated in combination with a decrease in cell viability and a reduction in clonogenic survival in PAK6-knockdown cells. In addition, transfection with PAK6 shRNA blocked cells in a more radiosensitive G2-M phase and increased levels of DNA double-strand breaks. We further explored the potential mechanisms by which PAK6 mediates resistance to radiation-induced apoptosis. Inhibition of PAK6 caused a decrease in Ser(112) phosphorylation of BAD, a proapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, which led to enhanced binding of BAD to Bcl-2 and Bcl-X(L) and release of cytochrome c culminating into caspase activation and cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PAK6 inhibition and irradiation resulted in significantly decreased survival of prostate cancer cells. The underlying mechanisms by which targeting PAK6 may improve radiation response seem to be multifaceted, and involve alterations in cell cycle distribution and impaired DNA double-strand break repair as well as relieved BAD phosphorylation.

Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer including noncoding transcripts

Levels of 27 transcripts were investigated as potential novel markers for prostate cancer, including genes encoding plasma membrane proteins (ADAM2, ELOVL5, MARCKSL1, RAMP1, TMEM30A, and TMEM66); secreted proteins (SPON2, TMEM30A, TMEM66, and truncated TMEFF2 (called POP4)); intracellular proteins (CAMK2N1, DHCR24, GLO1, NGFRAP1, PGK1, PSMA7, SBDS, and YWHAQ); and noncoding transcripts (POP1 (100 kb) from mRNA AK000023), POP2 (4 kb from mRNA AL832227), POP3 (50 kb from EST CFI40309), POP5 (intron of NCAM2, accession DO668384), POP6 (intron of FHIT), POP7 (intron of TNFAIP8), POP8 (intron of EFNA5), POP9 (intron of DSTN), POP10 (intron of ADAM2, accession DO668396), POP11 (87kb from EST BG194644), and POP12 (intron of EST BQ226050)). Expression of POP3 was prostate specific, whereas ADAM2, POP1, POP4, POP10, ELOVL5, RAMP1, and SPON2 had limited tissue expression. ELOVL5, MARCKSL1, NGFRAP1, PGK1, POP2, POP5, POP8, PSMA7, RAMP1, and SPON2 were significantly differentially expressed between laser microdissected malignant versus benign clinical samples of prostate tissue. PGK1, POP2, and POP12 correlated to clinical parameters. Levels of CAMK2N1, GLO1, SDBS, and TMEM30A transcripts tended to be increased in primary prostate cancer from patients who later had biochemical failure. Expression of GLO1, DHCR24, NGFRAP1, KLK3, and RAMP1 were significantly decreased in metastatic castration-recurrent disease compared with androgen-dependent primary prostate cancer. These novel potential biomarkers may therefore be useful in the diagnosis/prognosis of prostate cancer.

Sustained long-term immune responses after in situ gene therapy combined with radiotherapy and hormonal therapy in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To explore long-term immune responses after combined radio-gene-hormonal therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with prostate specific antigen 10 or higher or Gleason score of 7 or higher or clinical stage T2b to T3 were treated with gene therapy that consisted of 3 separate intraprostatic injections of AdHSV-tk on Days 0, 56, and 70. Each injection was followed by 2 weeks of valacyclovir. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was delivered 2 days after the second AdHSV-tk injection for 7 weeks. Hormonal therapy was initiated on Day 0 and continued for 4 months or 2.3 years. Blood samples were taken before, during, and after treatment. Lymphocytes were analyzed by fluorescent antibody cell sorting (FACS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 26 months (range, 4-48 months). The mean percentages of DR+CD8+ T cells were increased at all timepoints up to 8 months. The mean percentages of DR+CD4+ T cells were increased later and sustained longer until 12 months. Long-term (2.3 years) use of hormonal therapy did not affect the percentage of any lymphocyte population.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained long-term (up to 8 to 12 months) systemic T-cell responses were noted after combined radio-gene-hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. Prolonged use of hormonal therapy does not suppress this response. These results suggest the potential for sustained activation of cell-mediated immune responses against cancer.

Influence of patient age on biochemical freedom from disease in patients undergoing conformal proton radiotherapy of organ-confined prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To examine a large, single-institution series of patients to test the perception among clinicians that radiotherapy is preferred for "older" patients and surgery should be indicated for "younger" men. Both radiotherapy and surgery are used to control prostate cancer, and both yield similar results in terms of long-term biochemical disease-free (bNED) survival.

METHODS

The bNED survival results from more than 1000 patients treated solely with conformal radiotherapy were analyzed to determine whether a difference in outcome supervened for patients younger than 60 years of age versus older patients.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in bNED survival was found, in terms of patient age. Statistically significant predictors of outcome included pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage at diagnosis, and Gleason score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age younger than 60 years versus older than 60 years at treatment did not influence bNED survival significantly. Patient age at treatment should not be used in and of itself to recommend one type of treatment over another.

Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery

PURPOSE

To quantify the theoretical benefit, in terms of improvement in precision and accuracy of treatment delivery and in dose increase, of using online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) performed with onboard cone-beam computed tomography (CT), in an ideal setting of no intrafraction motion/deformation, in the treatment of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-two prostate cancer patients treated with conventional radiotherapy underwent multiple serial CT scans (median 18 scans per patient) during their treatment. We assumed that these data sets were equivalent to image sets obtainable by an onboard cone-beam CT. Each patient treatment was simulated with conventional IMRT and online IG-IMRT separately. The conventional IMRT plan was generated on the basis of pretreatment CT, with a clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-to-PTV) margin of 1 cm, and the online IG-IMRT plan was created before each treatment fraction on the basis of the CT scan of the day, without CTV-to-PTV margin. The inverse planning process was similar for both conventional IMRT and online IG-IMRT. Treatment dose for each organ of interest was quantified, including patient daily setup error and internal organ motion/deformation. We used generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD) to compare the two approaches. The generalized EUD (percentage) of each organ of interest was scaled relative to the prescription dose at treatment isocenter for evaluation and comparison. On the basis of bladder wall and rectal wall EUD, a dose-escalation coefficient was calculated, representing the potential increment of the treatment dose achievable with online IG-IMRT as compared with conventional IMRT.

RESULTS

With respect to radiosensitive tumor, the average EUD for the target (prostate plus seminal vesicles) was 96.8% for conventional IMRT and 98.9% for online IG-IMRT, with standard deviations (SDs) of 5.6% and 0.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The average EUDs of bladder wall and rectal wall for conventional IMRT vs. online IG-IMRT were 70.1% vs. 47.3%, and 79.4% vs. 72.2%, respectively. On average, a target dose increase of 13% (SD = 9.7%) can be achieved with online IG-IMRT based on rectal wall EUDs and 53.3% (SD = 15.3%) based on bladder wall EUDs. However, the variation (SD = 9.7%) is fairly large among patients; 27% of patients had only minimal benefit (<5% of dose increment) from online IG-IMRT, and 32% had significant benefit (>15%-41% of dose increment).

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal maximum dose increment achievable with online IG-IMRT is, on average, 13% with respect to the dose-limiting organ of rectum. However, there is a large interpatient variation, ranging <5%-41%. The results can be applied to calibrate other practical online image-guided techniques for prostate cancer radiotherapy, when intratreatment organ motion/deformation and machine delivery accuracy are considered.

Survival and cell cycle kinetics of human prostate cancer cell lines after single- and multifraction exposures to ionizing radiation

PURPOSE

Fractionated radiation therapy is frequently used to treat prostate cancer with an underlying assumption that each daily dose of ionizing radiation (IR) results in equal cell killing. We used three human prostate cancer cell lines to evaluate how survival after a single 2-Gy dose may predict responses after daily repeated 2-Gy exposures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

LNCaP, CWR22R, and PC3 cells were used in these studies. Survival after IR exposures was assessed using clonogenic assays and cell cycle responses were determined by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The experimentally determined multifraction survival differed significantly from that predicted from their single-dose SF2. LNCaP and CWR22R cells showed lower than predicted survivals; PC3 cells exhibited greater than predicted survival. Daily IR exposures resulted in changes in the cell cycle distributions beyond those caused by a single exposure to IR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in these prostate cancer cells: (1) survival after a clinically relevant dose of IR does not predict survival after multifraction IR, (2) cell cycle responses after a single 2 Gy dose can differ from those that occur when cells receive daily 2 Gy doses, and (3) some cell cycle changes that result from fractionated IR may predict their ultimate survival responses from such treatment.

Atypia in nonneoplastic prostate glands after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: duration of atypia and relation to type of radiotherapy

It is unknown how long postradiation atypia of benign prostate glands persists and whether the type of radiation is a factor. Forty-four cases consisting of 37 needle biopsies and 7 transurethral resections of the prostate seen in consultation (January 1997 to September 2000) were studied. In two men (5%), the cases were initially sent without a history of radiotherapy. Thirteen patients had minimal cancer (one core) with the remaining showing no residual tumor. Twenty patients were treated with interstitial radiotherapy (brachytherapy) (IRT), 17 with external beam radiation (XRT), and 7 with a combination of both (CT). The time interval between the treatment and tissue sampling ranged from 8 to 72 months (mean 3 months). Slides were reviewed blindly to the type of radiation and the time interval. Radiation-induced atypia in nonneoplastic glands, stromal fibrosis, and vascular changes was scored separately 0-3, with 0 showing no radiation injury and grade 3 showing prominent nuclear atypia, stromal fibrosis, and vascular hyalinization. We derived a combined score for the epithelial atypia from 0 to 300 (% of glands x grade) for each biopsy. For each case, an overall grade from 0 to 3 was given separately for the stromal and vascular changes. Cases were divided into three groups based on time between treatment and biopsy: <24 months (n = 14), between 24 and 48 months (n = 19), and >48 months (n = 11). Because the scores for epithelial atypia with IRT and CT were the same, we combined them into one group. There was more atypia in cases treated with IRT/CT (mean score 190) than XRT (mean score 105) (p <0.00001). There was also a greater degree of stromal fibrosis with IRT/CT than XRT (p <0.04). There was no correlation between the type of treatment and the effect on vessels. There was no change over time in epithelial atypia in men treated with IRT/CT. With XRT, there was less epithelial atypia in cases biopsied >48 months after treatment (mean score 57) compared with those with a shorter interval between biopsy and treatment (mean score 132) (p = 0.02). Radiation atypia in benign prostate glands may persist for a long time after the initial treatment, resulting in a significant pitfall in evaluating prostate biopsies. Prominent radiation effect (100% of the glands showing grade 2 and 3 atypia) was detected up to 72 months in one of the patients treated with IRT. In some cases, the clinician may not be aware of a prior remote history of radiation or does not relay this history to the pathologist. The pathologist must recognize radiation atypia without relying on the clinician to provide this history. The type of radiation therapy (IRT/CT vs XRT) is a major factor in the degree and duration of postradiation epithelial atypia.

The prognostic impact of cytokeratin-positive cells in bone marrow of patients with localized prostate cancer

Our study evaluates the prognostic significance of the cytokeratin-positive mononuclear cells (CK+ cells) in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) as detected by immunocytochemistry in patients with locoregionally confined prostate cancer. BM and PB samples were obtained from 66 newly diagnosed patients with T1-4pN0M0 prostate cancer. All samples were analyzed by standardized immunocytochemical methods (anticytokeratin mononuclear antibody; AE1/AE3) applying a negative immunomagnetic cell enrichment technique. A second sampling was obtained in 60 of the 66 patients >or=2 years after definitive radiotherapy. The median follow-up after high-dose radiotherapy of the patients was 65 months. For the analysis of the postradiotherapy clinical progression-free survival (PFS) treatment, failure was defined as pelvic tumor growth or development of distant metastases. At diagnosis CK+ cells were found in BM in 14 of 66 (21%) prostate cancer patients. This was not associated with an increased risk of progression. On the other hand, the presence of CK+ cells in 12 of 60 (20%) patients at the second BM aspiration was significantly related to a shorterPFS (p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of CK+ cells in the posttreatment BM did not remain as an independent variable of PFS assessment if posttreatment PSA was entered into the analysis. CK+ cells in PB were found in 12% of the patients. After therapy, none of the patients had detectable CK+ cells in PB. The presence of CK+ cells in the posttreatment but not in the pretreatment BM was associated with decreased PFS in patients irradiated for pelvis-confined nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Although this association was not retained in multivariate analysis, our observations indicate that the presence of CK+ cells after local therapy define a group of patients that have a high risk of developing distant metastases.

BCL2 antisense reduces prostate cancer cell survival following irradiation

Irradiation of the prostate, delivered as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), is currently one of the few treatment options for localized prostate cancer. While it is relatively effective, the failure rate still remains unacceptably high with a 5-year biochemical failure rate of 10-40%. Utilizing genetically engineered LNCaP prostate cancer sublines that either overexpress Bcl2 (LNCaP/S22-d) or have down-regulated Bcl2 (LNCaP/AS17-f) we investigated the influence of this antiapoptotic protein on clonogenic survival following radiation. The radiation dose response curves (2-8 Gy) for the sublines differed significantly from the parental LNCaP (LNCaP/S22d: p < 0.001 and LNCaP/AS17-f: p = 0.008). The relative survival of the sublines revealed increased survival in the Bcl2 overexpressing cells, and decreased survival in the Bcl2 down-regulated cells. These data suggest a potentially important therapeutic approach for enhancing radiosensitivity in prostate tumors via antisense oligonucleotide or other drug therapies that down-regulate Bcl2. Strategies such as these likely hold the promise of enhancing the efficacy of EBRT by decreasing tumor cell survival, reducing the incidence of tumor recurrence and improving patient outcome.

Estimating survival gain for economic evaluations with survival time as principal endpoint: a cost-effectiveness analysis of adding early hormonal therapy to radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer

The problem of estimating expected outcomes for the economic evaluation of treatments for which the outcome of principal interest is (quality adjusted) survival time has so far not received sufficient attention in the literature. The best estimate of expected survival is mean survival time, but with censored survival data, the true survival time for all the subjects is not known, so the mean is not defined.A possible solution to this estimation problem is illustrated by a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of hormonal therapy to standard radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. A recently proposed method is used to approach the problem caused by censored cost data, and the impact of uncertainty is assessed by bootstrap resampling techniques. Mean survival time is estimated by a restricted means analysis with the time point of restriction determined by statistical criteria. When average total costs and mean survival time is evaluated at this time point of restriction, the result is that the combined therapy (radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy) increases mean survival time by about 1 year, while reducing the costs per patient for the French health insurance system by 12 700 FF. The time point of restriction may also be determined by other criteria and mean survival time may be estimated by extrapolating the survival curves by means of various parametric survival distributions. We show that the exact results of the economic evaluation are decisively determined by the restriction time point chosen and the approach taken to estimate mean survival time.

Cost-effectiveness of the addition of early hormonal therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer: results decisively determined by the cut-off time-point chosen for the analysis

We present a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis using data from a randomised controlled trial (EORTC 22863) of the addition of early hormonal therapy with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue to radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Data on the use of medical resources were extracted from the hospital charts of 90 patients recruited into the trial by one French hospital. Costs are assessed from the viewpoint of the French healthcare financing system and adjusted for censoring. Expected costs per patient of each treatment is related to the expected outcome, mean survival time, estimated by a restricted means analysis. The time point of restriction is determined by statistical criteria. In the base case analysis with a cut-off time point at 8.58 years, the combined therapy group (COMB) had a gain in mean survival time of 1.06 years (7.05 versus 5.99 years) and a reduction of average total costs of 12700 French francs (FF) (58300 FF versus 71000 FF). The analysis of uncertainty uses bootstrap techniques with 5000 replicates to examine the joint distribution of cost and survival outcomes. In 76% of the cases, COMB results in longer mean survival time and lower costs than the radiotherapy group (RT). In cases where COMB therapy raises costs (13% of the cases), it is rarely by more than 20000 FF per patient, no matter the size of the associated survival gain. It is thus highly likely that COMB should be considered a cost-effective option compared with RT for these patients. The exact result of the economic evaluation is decisively determined by the restriction time point selected for the determination of mean survival time, partly also because the average total costs of the two treatments develop entirely differently as a function of the survival time.

Image-guided therapy in urology

Technological breakthroughs have advanced the fields of urology, radiology, and minimally invasive surgery. Today, the various imaging modalities are increasingly applied to guiding therapy. Among the procedures now in use or under development are percutaneous cyst drainage or sclerotherapy; tissue ablation with high-intensity focused ultrasound, cold, heat, or photon radiation; and conformal radiation and brachytherapy. As current limitations are overcome, image-guided therapy will expand.

Prognostic value of neuroendocrine serum markers and PSA in irradiated patients with pN0 localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with localized prostate cancer depends on clinical stage, histological grade, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We evaluated the additional prognostic impact of serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and chromograninA (CgA) after curative radiotherapy and the importance of serum PSA, analyzed 3 months after irradiation.

METHODS

From 1988 to 1995, 161 patients with localized T1-4, pN0M0, prostate adenocarcinoma were treated with external radiation (66Gy, 2Gy/5 fractions per week). Frozen serum samples were assessed for CgA, NSE, and PSA before and 3 months after radiotherapy. CgA was analyzed in only 100 patients. NSE and CgA were determined by a immunometric assay. Total PSA was measured by a time-resolved fluoro-immunometric assay.

RESULTS

Prior to radiotherapy CgA was elevated in 16 of 100 patients, and NSE was elevated in 33 of the 161 patients. There was no association between grade, T category or pretreatment PSA and the levels of neuroendocrine markers. Pretreatment-elevated serum NSE, but not initial CgA, identified patients with an unfavorable prognosis. A < 50% reduction of PSA 3 months after radiotherapy was associated with decreased failure-free 10 years urvival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased risk of failure for patients with elevated pretreatment NSE and PSA values, T3 category, and decline of PSA less than 50% 3 months after radiotherapy. The presence of none or several risk factors (1-4) defined clearly separable groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Together with T category and pretreatment serum PSA values, serum NSE values before radiotherapy and decrease of serum PSA 3 months after radiotherapy represent easily assessable prognostic parameters in patients undergoing curative radiation treatment for prostate cancer.

The role of active treatment in early prostate cancer

The dramatic increase in the number of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in the last decade presents a difficult challenge for physicians. Because the window of opportunity for cure is short it is vital to begin treatment before the cancer cells invade neighbouring tissues and organs or metastasise to other sites. This pressure of increased patient numbers provided clinicians with the opportunity to investigate other treatment options. New surgical techniques including laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, improving therapeutic radiation by the introduction of conformal radiotherapy, neutron radiation, cryosurgery, high intensity focussed ultrasound (HIF) and the revival of brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation are currently being investigated. The goal of these techniques is to treat localized prostate cancer based on the endpoints of disease specific mortality, no evidence of disease, absent or low levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), reduced side-effects, improved quality of life and importantly increased cost-efficacy. It is important to remember however, that watchful waiting and endocrine therapy are still valid therapy options in certain patient groups. The lack of randomized, prospective trials on local treatment of prostate cancer, makes it difficult to compare the efficacy of the different treatments, especially in terms of disease-specific survival. Trials are now in progress but it will be several years before results are available. In the meantime, we need to focus on surrogate endpoints, side effects, quality of life and the cost-efficacy of each treatment. It is also important to ensure that patients are kept informed and up-to-date with any new therapeutic developments.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy: a clinical review

Intensity modulated radiotherapy represents a significant advance in conformal radiotherapy. In particular, it allows the delivery of dose distributions with concave isodose profiles such that radiosensitive normal tissue close to, or even within a concavity of, a tumour may be spared from radiation injury. This article reviews the clinical application of this technique to date, and discusses the practical issues of treatment planning and delivery from the clinician's perspective.

Prodrug activation gene therapy and external beam irradiation in the treatment of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Gene therapy may represent a new avenue for the development of multimodal treatment for men with locally advanced prostate cancer. This study explores the potential benefits of combining adenovirus-mediated (ADV) herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (HSV-tk) transduction and ganciclovir (GCV) therapy with external beam radiation therapy (XRT) to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of each treatment alone.

METHODS

ADV/HSV-tk-transduced mouse prostate cancer cells, RM-1, were irradiated as single-cell suspensions at escalating doses in a cesium source (4.4 Gy/min). HSV-tk-expressing cells were randomized to receive varying doses and varying chronologies of GCV therapy in relation to XRT to fully evaluate potential cooperative activities. End points were determined in a clonogenic assay by counting colonies with greater than 50 cells 7 days after replating. The potential role of apoptosis as a mediator of enhanced cell killing was addressed by a TUNEL assay 12 and 24 hours after therapy.

RESULTS

Neither ADV infection nor GCV alone affected XRT killing. However, the combination of ADV/HSV-tk+GCV plus XRT maintained the 1 log of cell kill from gene therapy alone through escalating doses of radiation. Radiation sensitization was noted at higher doses of radiation (8.8 Gy or more). Although decreasing the GCV dose had a profound negative influence on HSV-tk+GCV-mediated killing, combination therapy continued to maintain the degree of HSV-tk+GCV killing through escalating doses of XRT in an additive fashion but did not result in radiosensitization. Changing the chronology of GCV exposure in relation to XRT did not significantly alter the additive activities of combination therapy. Studies of apoptosis noted a doubling of apoptotic activity with HSV-tk+GCV compared with HSV-tk+PBS with or without XRT. However, there was no significant change in apoptotic activity in combination therapy over HSV-tk+GCV alone within the 24-hour period after GCV exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ADV/HSV-tk+GCV and XRT appears to result in at least additive, and with higher doses of radiation, synergistic killing activities, indicating a potential usefulness of this treatment strategy for patients with prostate cancer.