3D volume growth rate evaluation in the EORTC-BTG-1320 clinical trial for recurrent WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that tumor 3D volume growth rate (3DVGR) classification could help in the assessment of drug activity in patients with meningioma using three main classes and a total of five subclasses: class 1: decrease; 2: stabilization or severe slowdown; 3: progression. The EORTC-BTG-1320 clinical trial was a randomized phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of trabectedin for recurrent WHO 2 or 3 meningioma. Our objective was to evaluate the discriminative value of 3DVGR classification in the EORTC-BTG-1320.

METHODS

All patients with at least one available MRI before trial inclusion were included. 3D volume was evaluated on consecutive MRI until progression. 2D imaging response was centrally assessed by MRI modified Macdonald criteria. Clinical benefit was defined as neurological or functional status improvement or steroid decrease or discontinuation.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with a median age of 58.5 years were included. Best 3DVGR classes were: 1, 2A, 3A and 3B in 2 (16.7%), 4 (33.3%), 2 (16.7%) and 4 (33.3%) patients, respectively. All patients with progression-free survival longer than 6 months had best 3DVGR class 1 or 2. 3DVGR classes 1 and 2 (combined) had a median overall survival of 34.7 months versus 7.2 months for class 3 (p=0.061). All class 1 patients (2/2), 75% of class 2 patients (3/4) and only 10% of class 3 patients (1/10) had clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor 3DVGR classification may be helpful to identify early signals of treatment activity in meningioma clinical trials.

Association of pre-radiotherapy tumour burden and overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma adjusted for MGMT promoter methylation status

PURPOSE

We retrospectively evaluated the association between postoperative pre-radiotherapy tumour burden and overall survival (OS) adjusted for the prognostic value of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radio-/chemotherapy with temozolomide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included from the CENTRIC (EORTC 26071-22072) and CORE trials if postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were available within a timeframe of up to 4weeks before radiotherapy, including both pre- and post-contrast T1w images and at least one T2w sequence (T2w or T2w-FLAIR). Postoperative (residual) pre-radiotherapy contrast-enhanced tumour (CET) volumes and non-enhanced T2w abnormalities (NT2A) tissue volumes were obtained by three-dimensional segmentation. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan Meier estimates were used to assess the association of pre-radiotherapy CET/NT2A volume with OS adjusted for known prognostic factors (age, performance status, MGMT status).

RESULTS

408 tumour (of which 270 MGMT methylated) segmentations were included. Median OS in patients with MGMT methylated tumours was 117 weeks versus 61weeks in MGMT unmethylated tumours (p < 0.001). When stratified for MGMT methylation status, higher CET volume (HR 1.020; 95% confidence interval CI [1.013-1.027]; p < 0.001) and older age (HR 1.664; 95% CI [1.214-2.281]; p = 0.002) were significantly associated with shorter OS while NT2A volume and performance status were not.

CONCLUSION

Pre-radiotherapy CET volume was strongly associated with OS in patients receiving radio-/chemotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma stratified by MGMT promoter methylation status.

P09.03.A Associations of levetiracetam use with the safety and tolerability of chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Background

Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most frequently used antiepileptic drugs (AED) for brain tumor patients with seizures. We hypothesized that toxicity of LEV and temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy may overlap.

Patients and Methods

In a retrospective analysis of individual patient data using a pooled cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma included in clinical trials prior to chemoradiotherapy (CENTRIC, CORE, AVAglio) or prior to maintenance therapy (ACT-IV), we tested associations of hematologic toxicity, nausea or emesis, fatigue, and psychiatric adverse events during concomitant and maintenance treatment with the use of LEV alone or with other AED versus other AED alone or in combination versus no AED use at the start of chemoradiotherapy and of maintenance treatment.

Results

Of 1681 and 2020 patients who started concomitant chemoradiotherapy and maintenance temozolomide, respectively, 473 and 714 patients (28.1% and 35.3%) were treated with a LEV-containing regimen, 538 and 475 patients (32.0% and 23.5%) with other AED, and 670 and 831 patients (39.9% and 41.1%) had no AED. LEV was associated with higher risk of psychiatric adverse events during concomitant treatment in univariable and multivariable analyses (RR 1.86 and 1.88, p&lt;0.001) while there were no associations with hematologic toxicity, nausea or emesis, or fatigue. LEV was associated with reduced risk of nausea or emesis during maintenance treatment in multivariable analysis (HR=0.80, p=0.017) while there were no associations with hematologic toxicity, fatigue, or psychiatric adverse events.

Conclusion

Any association of psychiatric adverse events with LEV did not persist beyond the concomitant treatment phase. Antiemetic properties of LEV may be beneficial during the maintenance temozolomide.

OS07.5.A Report from the pooled analysis of the randomized trials NORDIC, NOA-8 and CE.6 on elderly patients with glioblastoma

Background

The majority of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma are over 60 years old. Three randomized trials addressed the roles of radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for these patients. Two, the NORDIC and NOA-08 (N&N) compared RT versus TMZ head-to-head, the third, CE.6, randomized between hypofractionated RT and the combination of RT+TMZ. All showed significant benefit for the TMZ arms, especially for patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors. An ongoing pooled analysis of these three trials focuses on identifying significant baseline prognostic factors and assess their value for predicting outcome in relation to treatment. The aim is improved selection of elderly patients with glioblastoma for their optimal treament; RT alone, TMZ with or without concomitant RT or palliative care.

Methods

The data of two phase 3 studies (N&N) were pooled to build a large dataset and findings are compared to CE.6 trial data. A re-assessment of the clinically most relevant MGMT cut-off is performed. The prognostic value of baseline clinical factors and quality of life scores, determined by the EORTC QLQ-30 and BN-20 questionnaires, are investigated. Data is also analysed to account for a possible impact of sex.

Results

The N&N dataset includes 715 and the comparative dataset (CE.6) 562 patients. Median age for N&N is 71 years and 73 for CE.6. In N&N and CE.6 respectively, 66.2% versus 70.5% underwent resection and 50.9% and 75.3% were on steroids at the time of study inclusion. In N&N, 401 patients received RT alone and 281 in CE.6, while 314 were randomized to TMZ alone in N&N and 281 to concomitant RT and TMZ in CE.6. For N&N MGMT promoter methylation status was successfully determined for 412 (57.6%) and 354 (63.0%) for CE.6. In a first report, patients with the combination of the comorbidities hypertension, diabetes and/or cerebrovascular insult had poorer prognosis when treated with TMZ.

Conclusion

An ongoing pooled analysis of the trials NORDIC, NOA-08 and CE.6 is expected to identify factors that will improve personalized medicine for elderly patients with glioblastoma. Reanalyzed MGMT promoter methylation data and the role of baseline quality of life for outcome will be reported.

P11.63.B Thrombocytopenia limits the feasibility of salvage lomustine chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of EORTC 26101

Background

Chemotherapies used for the treatment of primary brain tumors frequently induce hematological toxicity. Thrombocytopenia represents the main cause of stopping chemotherapy for toxicity. Here we explored the incidence, and the consequences for treatment exposure and survival, of thrombocytopenia induced by lomustine chemotherapy at first recurrence of glioblastoma.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of thrombocytopenia at first recurrence of glioblastoma, its consequences for treatment delivery, and associations with outcome in the phase II and III parts of EORTC 26101, a randomized trial designed to define the role of lomustine versus bevacizumab versus their combination in glioblastoma patients at first relapse.

Results

225 patients were treated with lomustine alone (median 1 cycle) (group 1) and 283 patients were treated with lomustine plus bevacizumab (median 3 lomustine cycles) (group 2). Among cycle delays and dose reductions of lomustine for toxicity, thrombocytopenia was the leading cause. Among 129 patients of group 1 and 187 patients of group 2 experiencing at least one episode of thrombocytopenia, 36 patients in group 1 and 93 in group 2 had their treatment modified because of thrombocytopenia. Lomustine was discontinued for thrombocytopenia in 16 patients (7.1%) in group 1 and in 38 patients (13.4%) in group 2. Patients with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated glioblastoma treated with lomustine alone experienced more interference with study treatment than patients with tumors without MGMT promoter methylation. On adjusted analysis accounting for major prognostic factors, treatment modification by thrombocytopenia was a positive prognostic factor for overall survival, and this effect was entirely driven by patients with tumors without MGMT promoter methylation only. Conversely, thrombocytopenia was associated with inferior progression-free survival in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors, suggesting a link to insufficient lomustine exposure.

Conclusion

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is a major limitation to adequate exposure to lomustine salvage chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Its association with survival suggests that mitigating thrombocytopenia to allow enhanced drug exposure in patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors might improve outcome.

Results of screening in early and advanced thoracic malignancies in the EORTC pan-European SPECTAlung platform

Access to a comprehensive molecular alteration screening is patchy in Europe and quality of the molecular analysis varies. SPECTAlung was created in 2015 as a pan-European screening platform for patients with thoracic malignancies. Here we report the results of almost 4 years of prospective molecular screening of patients with thoracic malignancies, in terms of quality of the program and molecular alterations identified. Patients with thoracic malignancies at any stage of disease were recruited in SPECTAlung, from June 2015 to May 2019, in 7 different countries. Molecular tumour boards were organised monthly to discuss patients' molecular and clinical profile and possible biomarker-driven treatments, including clinical trial options. FFPE material was collected and analysed for 576 patients with diagnosis of pleural, lung, or thymic malignancies. Ultimately, 539 patients were eligible (93.6%) and 528 patients were assessable (91.7%). The turn-around time for report generation and molecular tumour board was 214 days (median). Targetable molecular alterations were observed in almost 20% of cases, but treatment adaptation was low (3% of patients). SPECTAlung showed the feasibility of a pan-European screening platform. One fifth of the patients had a targetable molecular alteration. Some operational issues were discovered and adapted to improve efficiency.

PL03.4.A Factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) deterioration in glioma patients during the progression-free survival period

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of functioning and wellbeing during the progression-free survival (PFS) period is important for glioma patients. This study aimed to determine whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be maintained during progression-free time, and factors associated with HRQoL deterioration in this period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included longitudinal HRQoL data from previously published clinical trials in glioma. The percentage of patients with stable HRQoL until progression was determined per scale and at the individual patient level (i.e. considering all scales simultaneously). We assessed time to a clinically relevant deterioration in HRQoL, expressed in deterioration-free survival and time-to-deterioration (the first including progression as an event). We also determined the association between sociodemographic and clinical factors and HRQoL deterioration in the progression-free period.

RESULTS

5539 patients with at least baseline HRQoL scores had a median time from randomization to progression of 7.6 months. Between 9%-29% of the patients deteriorated before disease progression on the evaluated HRQoL scales. When considering all scales simultaneously, 47% of patients deteriorated on ≥1 scale. Median deterioration-free survival period ranged between 3.8–5.4 months, and median time-to-deterioration between 8.2–11.9 months. For most scales, only poor performance status was independently associated with clinically relevant HRQoL deterioration in the progression-free period.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL was maintained in only 53% of patients in their progression-free period, and treatment was not independently associated with this deterioration in HRQoL. Routine monitoring of the patients’ functioning and well-being during the entire disease course is therefore important, so that interventions can be initiated when problems are signalled.

OS05.3.A Temporal muscle thickness as surrogate parameter of sarcopenia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients:translational imaging analysis of the CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 and CORE trials

BACKGROUND

Temporal muscle thickness (TMT) was described as surrogate parameter of skeletal muscle mass. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic relevance of TMT in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TMT was assessed in cranial magnetic resonance images (MRI) of 755 pts enrolled in the CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study (n=508) and CORE study (n=247). Predefined sex-specific TMT cutoff values were used to categorize “patients at risk of sarcopenia” and “patients with normal muscle status” at baseline. Furthermore, patients were categorized according to the extent of TMT loss over time. Cox models adjusted for other explanatory variables were used to evaluate the associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 510/755 (67.6%) patients were categorized as “at risk of sarcopenia” and 245/755 (32.4%) patients had normal muscle status at baseline. In both study cohorts patient at risk of sarcopenia at baseline had significantly higher risk of progression and death than patients with normal muscle status (CENTRIC: PFS = HR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.21, p&lt;0.001; OS = HR 0.341, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.44, p &lt; 0.001; CORE: PFS = HR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.39, p&lt;0.001; OS = HR 0.365, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.49, p&lt;0.001). In multivariate Cox models adjusted for other important prognostic parameters similar results were obtained. In patients at risk for sarcopenia the extent of TMT loss over time showed a significant inverse correlation with median OS times (CENTRIC: p &lt; 0.001, CORE: p = 0.005, log-rank test), but not in patients with normal baseline muscle mass in both study cohorts (CENTRIC: p = 0.538, CORE: p = 0.28, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

TMT identifies patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma at risk for progressive sarcopenia and adverse outcomes. Early intervention for muscle mass preservation including exercise and resistance training as well as nutritional support may prevent skeletal muscle loss and improve patient outcome in this group of patients.

OS05.2.A MGMT promoter status in IDH1/2 mutant anaplastic astrocytoma patients assessed by DNA methylation profiling and qMS-PCR: a report from the EORTC Brain Tumor Group

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TMZ) efficacy in high-grade glioma is related to O 6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter (MGMTp) methylation. We compared the prognostic and predictive effect of MGMTp between DNA methylation profiling (the MGMT-STP27 model) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (qMS-PCR) in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytoma patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 2x2 factorial design phase III CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy (RT), RT with concurrent TMZ, RT with 12 cycles of adjuvant TMZ, or RT with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. MGMTp methylation status was assessed with the MGMT-STP27 model using 850k EPIC data, and qMS-PCR. IDH1/2 mutation status was determined with a next-generation sequencing panel. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of randomization.

RESULTS

We identified 444 IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients of which MGMT-STP27 data was available for 440 patients (99.1%), qMS-PCR data for 361 patients (81.3%), and both for 357 patients (80.4%). MGMTp was methylated in 365 patients (83.0%) for the MGMT-STP27 model, and 168 patients (46.5%) for qMS-PCR. The agreement between the MGMT-STP27 model and qMS-PCR is 59.9% with a Cohen’s Kappa score of 0.229. At database lock, 289 patients with MGMT-STP27 data were still alive and 236 patients with qMS-PCR data. The median OS of MGMTp methylated glioma patients was 9.1 yrs [95 % confidence interval (CI) 7.5-not reached] for the MGMT-STP27 model, and not reached [95 % CI 9.1-not reached] for the qMS-PCR data. For MGMTp unmethylated glioma patients, the median OS was 6.9 yrs [95% CI 6.2-not reached] for the MGMT-STP27 model, and 6.8 yrs [95% CI 6.2–9.7] for the qMS-PCR data. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS based on MGMTp methylation was 0.88 [95% CI 0.58–1.31] for the MGMT-STP27 data, and 0.72 [95% CI 0.50–1.03]) for the qMS-PCR data. The HR for OS after RT with any TMZ vs RT alone for the MGMT-STP27 model was 0.53 [95% CI 0.37–0.78] for MGMTp methylated, and 0.54 [95% CI 0.25–1.18] for MGMTp unmethylated glioma patients; and for the MS-PCR data was 0.34 [95% CI 0.19–0.61] for MGMTp methylated, and 0.53 [95% CI 0.33–0.85] for MGMTp unmethylated glioma patients.

CONCLUSION

MGMTp methylation, regardless of assay, was neither prognostic nor predictive for outcome to temozolomide in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients.

Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomised, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma

Background

Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors related to outcome in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients.

Methods

The CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy +/− concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide. The presence of necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation was scored at central pathology review. Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays were used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and the determination of copy number variations (CNV). Two DNA methylation-based tumor classifiers were used for risk stratification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using 1 of the 2 glioma-tailored NGS panels. The primary endpoint was overall survival measured from the date of randomization.

Results

Full analysis (genome-wide DNA methylation and NGS) was successfully performed on 654 tumors. Of these, 432 tumors were IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytomas. Both epigenetic classifiers identified poor prognosis patients that partially overlapped. A predictive prognostic Cox proportional hazard model identified that independent prognostic factors for IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients included; age, mini-mental state examination score, treatment with concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide, the epigenetic classifiers, PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, PI3K mutations, and total CNV load. Independent recursive partitioning analysis highlights the importance of these factors for patient prognostication.

Conclusion

Both clinical and molecular factors identify IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients with worse outcome. These results will further refine the current WHO criteria for glioma classification.

PL3.3 Second interim and first molecular analysis of the EORTC randomized phase III intergroup CATNON trial on concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in anaplastic glioma without 1p/19q codeletion

BACKGROUND

The 1st interim analysis of the CATNON trial showed benefit from adjuvant (adj) temozolomide (TMZ) on overall survival (OS) but remained inconclusive about concurrent (conc) TMZ. A 2nd interim analysis was planned after 356 events.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 2x2 factorial design phase III CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to either 59.4 Gy radiotherapy (RT) alone; the same RT with concTMZ; the same RT and 12 cycles of adjTMZ or the same RT with both concTMZ and adjTMZ (doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31442-3). MGMT promoter methylation (MGMTmeth) status was re-assessed with the Infinium Methylation EPIC Beadchip using the MGMT_STP27 model. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH) mutation (mt) status was assessed with glioma targeted Agilent SureSelect baits sequence using an Illumina HiSeq2500 Rapid PE100.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 56 months and 356 events, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS adjusted for stratification factors after concTMZ was 0.968 (99.1% CI 0.73, 1.28). 5-year OS was 50.2% with and 52.7% without concTMZ (95% CI [44.4, 55.7] and [46.9, 58.1]). An IDHmt was found in 335 of 480 assessed cases (70%). Median OS was 19 mo (95% CI 16.3, 22.3) in IDHwt tumors and 116 mo (95% CI 82.0, 116.6) in IDHmt tumors. The interaction test based on IDH status was significant (p=0.016) in the univariate HR analysis for OS after concTMZ (IDHwt, n=145, events=120, HR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.89, 1.82, p=0.19; IDHmt, n=335, events=92, HR= 0.67, 95% CI 0.44, 1.03, p=0.06). IDHmt was predictive of benefit from adjTMZ (IDHmt HR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.27, 0.64; IDHwt: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73, 1.52; interaction test p = 0.001). In IDHmt patients that received adjTMZ, the HR for OS after concTMZ was 0.71 (95% CI 0.35, 1.42, p=0.32). MGMTmeth was found in 288 of 410 assessed cases (70%), interaction test for concTMZ (p = 0.092) and adjTMZ (p = 0.166) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In the entire study cohort, concTMZ did not increase OS. However, in IDHmt tumors a trend towards benefit of concTMZ is present. AdjTMZ increased OS in IDHmt but not in IDHwt tumors. Further analyses and follow-up will allow full assessment of efficacy in the molecular subgroups.

P14.54 Association of EGFR Expression and Copy Number with Outcome in Depatux-m (ABT-414) Randomized Phase II Study of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group

BACKGROUND

Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a dismal prognosis and are in desperate need of better therapy than the standard of care (SOC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification is reported in more than 50% of GBMs as an important target for therapeutic intervention and as a potential predictive biomarker. Depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m, ABT-414) is an antibody-drug conjugate that preferentially binds cells with EGFR active conformation, internalized and releases the cytotoxin, leading to cell death. In the primary analysis we reported a trend (in EORTC 1410; HR: 0.71, 95% CI [0.50–1.02], p = 0.06) at topline analysis which continued to improve with ad hoc follow up (HR of 0.66, 95%CI [0.47–0.93]; p = 0.016) was observed towards improved overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR amplified (amp) recurrent glioblastoma treated with depatux-m in combination with temozolomide. OS was equivalent in the depatux-m monotherapy and chemotherapy control arms. Here, we evaluate the association of EGFR mRNA expression and EGFR copy number with outcome using the updated efficacy data.

METHODS

Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amp GBM at first recurrence after temozolomide chemo-irradiation. Patients were randomized to either a) depatux-m 1.0–1.25 mg/kg combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, b) depatux-m 1.0–1.25 mg/kg monotherapy or c) either temozolomide or lomustine (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was OS. Long-term follow-up data (24 months follow-up; 237 events) were utilized for this EGFR analysis. The expression level of EGFR was determined using RT-PCR. The absolute copy number of EGFR was determined using next generation sequencing. EGFR mRNA and EGFR copy number were treated as continuous variables and compared to OS using a generalized additive cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The outcome of the long-term follow-up was that when used in combination with TMZ, depatux-m addition resulted in improved OS as compared to TMZ/ LOM control regardless of EGFR expression or absolute copy number of EGFR. In contrast, in depatux-m monotherapy, a trend was observed that depatux-m improved the outcome only at highest expression levels and highest absolute EGFR copy number.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up trial results demonstrated that addition of depatux-m to SOC showed a trend to increased survival as compared to SOC alone in EGFR amp patients as determined using Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Further retrospective analysis supports this efficacy advantage is observed at all expression and amplification levels. When used in combination with SOC and regardless of the absolute copy number of EGFR, the trend for OS improvement was observed at all expression levels.

PL3.2 Trabectedin for recurrent WHO grade II or III meningioma: a randomized phase II study of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-1320-BTG)

BACKGROUND

EORTC-1320-BTG investigated the activity, safety and quality of life of therapy with the tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid trabectedin (Yondelis®) in patients with recurrent higher-grade meningiomas. Trabectedin was originally derived from the Caribbean sea squirt, Ecteinascidia turbinata, and currently is manufactured by total synthesis.

METHODS

Adult patients with histological diagnosis of WHO grade II or III meningioma and radiologically documented progression after maximal feasible surgery and radiotherapy were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2every three weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Within 22.1 months, we randomized a total of 90 patients (n=29 in LOC arm, n=61 in trabectedin arm) in 35 institutions and nine countries. In the LOC arm, the following treatments were administered: hydroxyurea (n=11), bevacizumab (n=9), none (n=4), chemotherapy (n=3), somatostatin analogue (n=1), combined chemotherapy and somatostatin analogue (n=1). With 71 PFS events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR] for progression, 1.42; 80% CI, 1.00–2.03; p=0.204) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) in the LOC and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%) in the trabectedin arm. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR for death, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54–1.76; p=0.94).Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 44.4% (18.5% related, 4 serious adverse events, 0 lethal events) of the patients in the LOC and 59% (32.8% related, 57 serious adverse events and 2 toxic deaths) of patient in the trabectedin arm.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first prospective randomized trial performed in recurrent grade II or III meningioma, trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with significantly higher toxicity as compared to LOC treatment. The data collected in this study may serve as benchmark for future clinical trials in this setting.

OS7.2 Measuring change in health-related quality of life: the added value of analysis on the individual patient level in glioma patients in clinical decision making

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often used as an outcome in glioma research, reflecting the impact of disease and treatment on a patient’s functioning and wellbeing. Data on changes in HRQoL scores may provide important information for clinical decision-making, but different analytical methods may lead to different interpretations of the impact of treatment on HRQoL. This study aimed to examine three different methods to evaluate change in HRQoL, and to study whether these methods result in different interpretations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

HRQoL and sociodemographical/clinical data from 15 randomized clinical trials were combined. Change in HRQoL scores was analyzed in three ways: (1) at the group level, comparing mean changes in scale/item scores between treatment arms over time, (2) at the patient level per scale/item by calculating the percentage of patients that deteriorated, improved or remained stable on a scale/item per scale/item, and (3) at the individual patient level combining all scales/items.

RESULTS

Baseline and first follow-up HRQoL data were available for 3727 patients. At the group scale/item level (method 1), only the item ‘hair loss’ showed a significant and clinically relevant change (i.e. ≥10 points) over time, whereas change scores on the other scales/items showed a statistically significant change only (all p<.001, range in change score: 0.1–6.2). Analyses on the patient level per scale (method 2) indicated that, while a large proportion of patients had stable HRQoL over time (range 27–84%), many patients deteriorated (range: 6–43%) or improved (range: 8–32%) on a specific scale/item. At the individual patient level (method 3), the majority of patients (86%) showed both deterioration and improvement, while only 1% of the patients remained stable on all scales. Clustering on clinical characteristics (WHO performance status, sex, tumor type, type of resection, newly diagnosed versus recurrent tumor and age) did not identify subgroups of patients with a specific pattern of change in their HRQoL score.

CONCLUSION

Different analytical methods of changes in HRQoL result in distinct interpretations of treatment effects, all of which may be relevant for clinical decision-making. Additional information about the joint impact of treatment on all outcomes, showing that most patients experience both deterioration and improvement, may help patients and physicians to make the best treatment decision.

P14.124 EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximal debulking surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant as well as maintenance therapy with the alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ). However, the prognosis remains poor and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Targeting the proteasome has been considered a promising anti-cancer approach for several years. Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and pan-proteasome inhibitor, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and has been assessed in phase I trials in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. Patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a performance status >70 are eligible. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard of care (TMZ/RT→TMZ) alone or TMZ/RT→TMZ plus marizomib. The study aims at enrolling 750 patients. Stratification factors include study site, age, performance status and extent of resection. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard of care with those receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy specifies the determination of this objective in the intent-to-treat population as well as the subgroup of patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. A translational research program has been set up. The study will be activated at approximately 50 EORTC sites across Europe, 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient recruitment started in June 2018 and as of April 29, 2019, a total of 164 patients have been randomized. An update on the enrolment status will be provided at the EANO meeting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345095

P11.08 Defining EGFR amplification status for clinical trial inclusion

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine trials targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastoma patients require selection for EGFR-amplified tumors. However, there is currently no golden standard in determining the amplification status of EGFR or EGFRvIII expression. Here, we aimed to determine which technique and which cut-offs are suitable to determine EGFR amplification status.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We compared fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) and RT-qPCR data from patients screened for trial inclusion into the Intellance 2 clinical trial, with data from a panel-based next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (both DNA and RNA).

RESULTS

By using data from >1000 samples, we show which cut-offs are optimal to determine EGFR gene amplification by FISH. Our data also show that gene amplification (as determined by FISH) correlates with EGFR expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) with ROC analysis showing an under the curve area of up to 0.902. EGFR expression as assessed by RT-qPCR therefore may function as a surrogate marker for EGFR amplification. Our NGS data shows that EGFR copy numbers can strongly vary between tumors with levels ranging from 2 to more than 100 copies per cell. Levels exceeding 5 gene copies can be used to define EGFR-amplification by NGS; below this level FISH detects very few (if any) EGFR amplified nuclei and none of the samples express EGFRvIII.

CONCLUSION

Our data from central laboratories and diagnostic sequencing facilities, using material from patients eligible for clinical trial inclusion, help defining the optimal cut-off for various techniques to determine EGFR amplification for diagnostic purposes.

OS7.4 Calculating the net clinical benefit in brain tumor clinical trials by combining survival and health-related quality of life data using two methods: quality adjusted survival effect sizes (QASES) and joint modelling (JM)

BACKGROUND

The impact of treatment on both the quality and the quantity of life, i.e. the ‘net clinical benefit’, should be considered to inform glioma patients and facilitate shared decision making. We applied two methods (i.e. Quality Adjusted Effect Sizes (QASES) and Joint Modelling (JM)) that combine survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data into one outcome, to gain insight in the net clinical benefit of a treatment strategy. In addition, we assessed if both methods result in similar interpretations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We calculated the net clinical benefit in one randomized controlled trial, EORTC 26951 comparing radiotherapy (RT) + PCV chemotherapy versus RT alone, as a proof of concept for other trials. With the QASES method, effect sizes for differences in survival and HRQoL between treatment arms were calculated. Next, the combined effect size can be determined by weighing the emphasis put on survival or HRQoL (e.g. survival more important). JM allows simultaneous modeling of a longitudinal outcome (HRQoL), and a time-to event outcome (survival). HRQoL scales/items that were selected for primary analysis in the main study were also selected for this analysis: fatigue, global health, social functioning, communication deficit, seizures, physical functioning, and nausea/vomiting.

RESULTS

288/386 patients completed baseline HRQoL forms and were included in the analysis. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with combined treatment (difference of 10.8 months). In contrast, the percentage of patients who experienced a clinically relevant deterioration (≥10 points) in nausea/vomiting, fatigue, social functioning and global health up to one year after treatment compared to baseline was larger in the RT+PCV arm. The QASES corresponded to a reduction in the median OS difference from 10.8 months to 6.8 months when adjusted for the HRQoL scales/items, when given equal weights to OS and HRQoL. JM analyses resulted in a theoretical loss of treatment effect in OS of 2–6% when adjusting for HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Both methods showed that adjusting for the impact of treatment on a relevant HRQoL parameter reduced the survival benefit in the experimental treatment arm compared to standard treatment arm. Applying these methods may facilitate communicating the impact of treatment to patients in clinical practice.

P14.41 Temporal muscle thickness is an independent prognostic marker in patients with progressive glioblastoma: translational imaging analysis of the EORTC-26101 trial

BACKGROUND

Temporal muscle thickness (TMT) was described as surrogate marker of skeletal muscle mass and prognostic parameter in brain metastasis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic relevance of TMT in patients with progressive glioblastoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TMT was analyzed on the baseline cranial magnetic resonance (MR) images of 596 patients with progression of glioblastoma after radio-chemotherapy enrolled in the EORTC 26101 trial. An optimal TMT cutoff for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was defined in the training cohort (n=260 patients enrolled in phase 2 part of EORTC 26101). Patients were grouped as “below” or “above” the TMT cutoff and associations with OS and PFS were tested using the Cox model. The findings were validated in a test cohort (n=308 patients enrolled in phase 3 part of EORTC 26101).

RESULTS

An optimal baseline TMT cutoff of 7.2 mm was obtained in the training cohort for both OS and PFS (AUC=0.64). Univariate analyses estimated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI:0.42, 0.70, p<0.0001) for OS and a HR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.64, p<0.0001) for PFS for the comparison of training cohort patients above versus below the TMT cutoff. This was confirmed in multivariate testing for OS (HR of 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.70, p<0.0001) and PFS (HR of 0.47, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.61, p<0.0001) adjusted for the important risk factors with relevance in the trial for OS (Steroid use at baseline, HR of 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.11, p = 0.002; MGMT Status, HR of 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.72, p<0.001; maximum diameter ≥ 40mm, HR of 2.49, 95% CI: 1.41, 4.41, p = 0.002; central hemisphere involvement, HR of 1.97, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.84, p<0.001) and PFS (Neurological deficit, HR of 1.44, 95% CI:1.09, 1,92, p = 0.011; Steroid use at baseline, HR of 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.86, p = 0.011; MGMT status, HR of 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.87, p = 0.007; Number of target lesion >1, HR of 2.47, 95% CI: 1.38, 4,41, p = 0.002). Similar results were obtained in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

TMT is an independent prognostic parameter in patients with progressive glioblastoma. This parameter is easily assessable on routine MR images and may help to better define frail patient populations and thus facilitate patient management by supporting patient stratification for therapeutic interventions or clinical trials.

A concurrent ultra-fractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide treatment: A promising therapy for newly diagnosed, inoperable glioblastoma

We report on a phase II clinical trial to determine the effect of a concurrent ultra-fractionated radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment in inoperable glioblastoma patients. A phase II study opened; patients over 18 years of age who were able to give informed consent and had histologically proven, newly diagnosed inoperable diagnosed and supratentorial glioblastoma were eligible. Three doses of 0.75 Gy spaced apart by at least 4 hr were delivered daily, 5 days a week for six consecutive weeks for a total of 67.5 Gy. Chemotherapy was administered during the same period, which consisted of temozolomide given at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) for 7 days a week. After a 4-week break, chemotherapy was resumed for up to six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide treatment, given every 28 days, according to the standard 5-day regimen. Tolerance and toxicity were the primary endpoints; survival and progression-free survival were the secondary endpoints. In total, 40 patients were enrolled in this study, 29 men and 11 women. The median age was 58 years, and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80. The concomitant ultra-fractionated radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment was well tolerated. Complete responses were seen in four patients, and partial responses were reported in seven patients. The median survival from the initial diagnosis was 16 months. Several long-term survivors were noted. Concurrent ultra-fractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide treatment are well accepted by the patients. The results showed encouraging survival rates for these unfavorable patients.

Prolonged survival with valproic acid use in the EORTC/NCIC temozolomide trial for glioblastoma

OBJECTIVE

This analysis was performed to assess whether antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) modulate the effectiveness of temozolomide radiochemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

METHODS

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 26981-22981/National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) CE.3 clinical trial database of radiotherapy (RT) with or without temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma was examined to assess the impact of the interaction between AED use and chemoradiotherapy on survival. Data were adjusted for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

When treatment began, 175 patients (30.5%) were AED-free, 277 (48.3%) were taking any enzyme-inducing AED (EIAED) and 135 (23.4%) were taking any non-EIAED. Patients receiving valproic acid (VPA) only had more grade 3/4 thrombopenia and leukopenia than patients without an AED or patients taking an EIAED only. The overall survival (OS) of patients who were receiving an AED at baseline vs not receiving any AED was similar. Patients receiving VPA alone (97 [16.9%]) appeared to derive more survival benefit from TMZ/RT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.63) than patients receiving an EIAED only (252 [44%]) (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90) or patients not receiving any AED (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

VPA may be preferred over an EIAED in patients with glioblastoma who require an AED during TMZ-based chemoradiotherapy. Future studies are needed to determine whether VPA increases TMZ bioavailability or acts as an inhibitor of histone deacetylases and thereby sensitizes for radiochemotherapy in vivo.

Boron neutron capture therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: an assessment of clinical potential

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the potential of BNCT, with L-boronophenylalanine (L-BPA), as first line radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The survival of patients with newly diagnosed GBM from a phase II BNCT study was compared with those from the two arms of a phase III study with conventional radiotherapy (RT) vs. RT plus concomitant and adjuvant medication with temozolomide (TMZ). A small subgroup, for which the methylation status of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) DNA-repair gene was known, was also considered. The results indicated that the use of BNCT with BPA should be explored in a stratified randomized phase II trial in which patients with the unmethylated MGMT DNA-repair gene are offered BNCT vs. RT plus TMZ.

Sagopilone (ZK-EPO, ZK 219477) for recurrent glioblastoma. A phase II multicenter trial by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Brain Tumor Group

Background: Sagopilone (ZK 219477), a lipophylic and synthetic analog of epothilone B, that crosses the blood–brain barrier has demonstrated preclinical activity in glioma models.

Patients and methods: Patients with first recurrence/progression of glioblastoma were eligible for this early phase II and pharmacokinetic study exploring single-agent sagopilone (16 mg/m² over 3 h every 21 days). Primary end point was a composite of either tumor response or being alive and progression free at 6 months. Overall survival, toxicity and safety and pharmacokinetics were secondary end points.

Results: Thirty-eight (evaluable 37) patients were included. Treatment was well tolerated, and neuropathy occurred in 46% patients [mild (grade 1) : 32%]. No objective responses were seen. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months was 6.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–18.7], the median PFS was just over 6 weeks, and the median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI 5.3–12.3), with a 1-year survival rate of 31.6% (95% CI 17.7–46.4). Maximum plasma concentrations were reached at the end of the 3-h infusion, with rapid declines within 30 min after termination.

Conclusions: No evidence of relevant clinical antitumor activity against recurrent glioblastoma could be detected. Sagopilone was well tolerated, and moderate-to-severe peripheral neuropathy was observed in despite prolonged administration.

Boron neutron capture therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: an assessment of clinical potential

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), with a 6-h infusion of the boron carrier l-boronophenylalanine as a fructose preparation (BPA-f), as first-line radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patient survival data from a Phase II study using BNCT were compared with retrospective data from the two arms of a Phase III study using conventional radiotherapy (RT) in the reference arm and using RT plus concomitant and adjuvant medication with temozolomide (TMZ) in the experimental arm, and were also compared with small subgroups of these patients for whom the methylation status of the MGMT (O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) DNA repair gene was known. Differences in the baseline characteristics, salvage therapy after recurrence and levels of severe adverse events were also considered. The results indicate that BNCT offers a treatment that is at least as effective as conventional RT alone. For patients with an unmethylated MGMT DNA repair gene, a possible clinical advantage of BNCT over RT/TMZ was suggested. BNCT is a single-day treatment, which is of convenience to patients, with mild side effects, which would offer an initial 6 weeks of good-quality life during the time when patients would otherwise be undergoing daily treatments with RT and TMZ. It is suggested that the use of BNCT with a 6-h infusion of BPA-f should be explored in a stratified randomised Phase II trial in which patients with the unmethylated MGMT DNA repair gene are offered BNCT in the experimental arm and RT plus TMZ in the reference arm.

Phase 1 study of LY317615 (enzastaurin) and temozolomide in patients with gliomas - EORTC trial 26054

e13005

Background: Enzastaurin (Enz) is a small selective inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC). Synergy with temozolomide (TMZ) has been demonstrated in vitro. This phase I trial investigated optimal dosing and toxicity when Enz was combined with a standard TMZ regimen. Methods: Patients (pts) with recurrent high-grade glioma or newly diagnosed disease not amenable to radiotherapy (RT) and WHO PS 0–1 were eligible. Pts on EIAEDs were excluded. Two dose levels (DL) of Enz were explored. DL1: Loading dose 500 mg followed by 250 mg daily. DL2: Loading dose 1,125 mg followed by 500 mg daily. TMZ was given at 150 mg/m2 d1-d5 every 28 days in cycle 1, escalating to 200 mg/m2 in subsequent cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined by CTCAE 3.0 criteria in the first two cycles as (1) any non haematological toxicity grade 3/4 (2) ANC < 500/mm3 (3) thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 (4) any toxicity reducing drug dose intensity to <80%. Results: 15 pts were included, three at DL1, 12 at DL2. 13 pts had received prior RT, seven prior chemotherapy, and two were newly diagnosed. Median number of cycles was four (range 2–8).Treatment is ongoing in five pts. TMZ dose was escalated in all pts with no DLT. Modest and reversible thrombocytopenia was the most frequent toxicity, occurring in seven pts (3 @ Gd 1, 3 @ Gd2, 1 @ Gd 3) and led to TMZ dose reduction in two pts and treatment delays in four pts (multiple in 2). One pt discontinued after three cycles due to persistent thrombocytopenia. Five pts developed neutropenia not requiring dose modification. Two pts developed hyperbilirubinemia. Six SAE's (3 at each DL) were recorded, and one death (DL2). None was considered treatment related. Two pts showed a partial response, six pts stable disease. Conclusions: Enz can be safely combined with standard TMZ regimen. Results of the just completed phase I part with Enz 250 mg twice daily dosing will also be presented at the meeting.

[Table: see text]