Molecular dynamics and accuracy of NMR structures: Effects of error bounds and data removal

Predicting Real-Valued Protein Residue Fluctuation Using FlexPred

The conventional view of a protein structure as static provides only a limited picture. There is increasing evidence that protein dynamics are often vital to protein function including interaction with partners such as other proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules. Considering flexibility is also important in applications such as computational protein docking and protein design. While residue flexibility is partially indicated by experimental measures such as the B-factor from X-ray crystallography and ensemble fluctuation from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy as well as computational molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, these techniques are resource-intensive. In this chapter, we describe the web server and stand-alone version of FlexPred, which rapidly predicts absolute per-residue fluctuation from a three-dimensional protein structure. On a set of 592 nonredundant structures, comparing the fluctuations predicted by FlexPred to the observed fluctuations in MD simulations showed an average correlation coefficient of 0.669 and an average root mean square error of 1.07 Å. FlexPred is available at http://kiharalab.org/flexPred/ .

Structural features that predict real-value fluctuations of globular proteins

It is crucial to consider dynamics for understanding the biological function of proteins. We used a large number of molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories of nonhomologous proteins as references and examined static structural features of proteins that are most relevant to fluctuations. We examined correlation of individual structural features with fluctuations and further investigated effective combinations of features for predicting the real value of residue fluctuations using the support vector regression (SVR). It was found that some structural features have higher correlation than crystallographic B-factors with fluctuations observed in MD trajectories. Moreover, SVR that uses combinations of static structural features showed accurate prediction of fluctuations with an average Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.669 and a root mean square error of 1.04 Å. This correlation coefficient is higher than the one observed in predictions by the Gaussian network model (GNM). An advantage of the developed method over the GNMs is that the former predicts the real value of fluctuation. The results help improve our understanding of relationships between protein structure and fluctuation. Furthermore, the developed method provides a convienient practial way to predict fluctuations of proteins using easily computed static structural features of proteins.

Fluctuations of backbone torsion angles obtained from NMR-determined structures and their prediction

Protein molecules exhibit varying degrees of flexibility throughout their three-dimensional structures. Protein structural flexibility is often characterized by fluctuations in the Cartesian coordinate space. On the other hand, the protein backbone can be mostly defined by two torsion angles ϕ and ψ only. We introduce a new flexibility descriptor, backbone torsion-angle fluctuation derived from the variation of backbone torsion angles from different NMR models. The torsion-angle fluctuations correlate with mean-squared spatial fluctuations derived from the same collection of NMR models. We developed a neural-network based real-value predictor based on sequence information only. The predictor achieved ten-fold cross-validated correlation coefficients of 0.59 and 0.60, and mean absolute errors of 22.7° and 24.3° for the angle fluctuation of ϕ and ψ, respectively. This predictor is expected to be useful for function prediction and protein structure prediction when predicted torsion angles are used as restraints. Both sequence- and structure-based prediction of torsion-angle fluctuation will be available at http://sparks.informatics.iupui.edu within the SPINE-X package.

Similarity measures for protein ensembles

Analyses of similarities and changes in protein conformation can provide important information regarding protein function and evolution. Many scores, including the commonly used root mean square deviation, have therefore been developed to quantify the similarities of different protein conformations. However, instead of examining individual conformations it is in many cases more relevant to analyse ensembles of conformations that have been obtained either through experiments or from methods such as molecular dynamics simulations. We here present three approaches that can be used to compare conformational ensembles in the same way as the root mean square deviation is used to compare individual pairs of structures. The methods are based on the estimation of the probability distributions underlying the ensembles and subsequent comparison of these distributions. We first validate the methods using a synthetic example from molecular dynamics simulations. We then apply the algorithms to revisit the problem of ensemble averaging during structure determination of proteins, and find that an ensemble refinement method is able to recover the correct distribution of conformations better than standard single-molecule refinement.

A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing

The existence of a large number of proteins for which both nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and X-ray crystallographic coordinates have been deposited into the Protein Data Bank (PDB) makes the statistical comparison of the corresponding crystal and NMR structural models over a large data set possible, and facilitates the study of the effect of the crystal environment and other factors on structure. We present an approach for detecting statistically significant structural differences between crystal and NMR structural models which is based on structural superposition and the analysis of the distributions of atomic positions relative to a mean structure. We apply this to a set of 148 protein structure pairs (crystal vs NMR), and analyze the results in terms of methodological and physical sources of structural difference. For every one of the 148 structure pairs, the backbone root-mean-square distance (RMSD) over core atoms of the crystal structure to the mean NMR structure is larger than the average RMSD of the members of the NMR ensemble to the mean, with 76% of the structure pairs having an RMSD of the crystal structure to the mean more than a factor of two larger than the average RMSD of the NMR ensemble. On average, the backbone RMSD over core atoms of crystal structure to the mean NMR is approximately 1 A. If non-core atoms are included, this increases to 1.4 A due to the presence of variability in loops and similar regions of the protein. The observed structural differences are only weakly correlated with the age and quality of the structural model and differences in conditions under which the models were determined. We examine steric clashes when a putative crystalline lattice is constructed using a representative NMR structure, and find that repulsive crystal packing plays a minor role in the observed differences between crystal and NMR structures. The observed structural differences likely have a combination of physical and methodological causes. Stabilizing attractive interactions arising from intermolecular crystal contacts which shift the equilibrium of the crystal structure relative to the NMR structure is a likely physical source which can account for some of the observed differences. Methodological sources of apparent structural difference include insufficient sampling or other issues which could give rise to errors in the estimates of the precision and/or accuracy.

Error distribution derived NOE distance restraints

Errors and imprecisions in distance restraints derived from NOESY peak volumes are usually accounted for by generous lower and upper bounds on the distances. In this paper, we propose a new form of distance restraints, replacing the subjective bounds by a potential function obtained from the error distribution of the distances. We derived the shape of the potential from molecular dynamics calculations and by comparison of NMR data with X-ray crystal structures. We used complete cross-validation to derive the optimal weight for the data in the calculation. In a model system with synthetic restraints, the accuracy of the structures improved significantly compared to calculations with the usual form of restraints. For experimental data sets, the structures systematically approach the X-ray crystal structures of the same protein. Also standard quality indicators improve compared to standard calculations. The results did not depend critically on the exact shape of the potential. The new approach is less subjective and uses fewer assumptions in the interpretation of NOESY peak volumes as distance restraints than the usual approach. Figures of merit for the structures, such as the RMS difference from the average structure or the RMS difference from the data, are therefore less biased and more meaningful measures of structure quality than with the usual form of restraints.

Estimating the accuracy of protein structures using residual dipolar couplings

It has been commonly recognized that residual dipolar coupling data provide a measure of quality for protein structures. To quantify this observation, a database of 100 single-domain proteins has been compiled where each protein was represented by two independently solved structures. Backbone 1H-15N dipolar couplings were simulated for the target structures and then fitted to the model structures. The fits were characterized by an R-factor which was corrected for the effects of non-uniform distribution of dipolar vectors on a unit sphere. The analyses show that favorable R values virtually guarantee high accuracy of the model structure (where accuracy is defined as the backbone coordinate rms deviation). On the other hand, unfavorable R values do not necessarily suggest low accuracy. Based on the simulated data, a simple empirical formula is proposed to estimate the accuracy of protein structures. The method is illustrated with a number of examples, including PDZ2 domain of human phosphatase hPTP1E.

Assessment of the role of computations in structural biology

Computations are now an integrated part of structural biology and are used in data gathering, data processing, and data storage as well as in a full spectrum of theoretical pursuits. In this review, we focus on areas of great promise and call attention to important issues of internal consistency and error analysis.

Ab initio modelling of the N-terminal domain of the secretin receptors

G protein coupled receptors of the secretin family are activated by peptide hormones of about 30 residues in length. There is considerable sequence homology within both the hormone and receptor families. The receptors possess in addition to the integral membrane domain a characteristic extracellular domain of about 120 residues in length, having conserved cysteine residues, which are involved in disulphide bridge formation, and tryptophanes, which have been shown to be critical for hormone binding. This extracellular domain does not have detectable homology to any known protein fold. In order to be able to propose a structure for this domain we have used ab initio prediction methods combined with constraints based on experimental results for the disulphide connectivity. The results of computational tools for predicting secondary structure and accessibility, together with ligand binding and mutational data and other structural considerations were used in the ab initio protein folding programs DRAGON and GADGET and also the simpler program RAMBLE, which was able to explore different permutations of disulphide bond connectivity, tryptophan side chain orientation and chain topology. The methods generated a limited number of plausible models but no single unique solution was found under the constraints. One of these was refined into a full atomic model that contained a possible peptide binding site comprising the most conserved residues.

Continuum secondary structure captures protein flexibility

The DSSP program assigns protein secondary structure to one of eight states. This discrete assignment cannot describe the continuum of thermal fluctuations. Hence, a continuous assignment is proposed. Technically, the continuum results from averaging over ten discrete DSSP assignments with different hydrogen bond thresholds. The final continuous assignment for a single NMR model successfully reflected the structural variations observed between all NMR models in the ensemble. The structural variations between NMR models were verified to correlate with thermal motion; these variations were captured by the continuous assignments. Because the continuous assignment reproduces the structural variation between many NMR models from one single model, functionally important variation can be extracted from a single X-ray structure. Thus, continuous assignments of secondary structure may affect future protein structure analysis, comparison, and prediction.