Cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma

Pure seminoma: a review and update

Pure seminoma is a rare pathology of the young adult, often discovered in the early stages. Its prognosis is generally excellent and many therapeutic options are available, especially in stage I tumors. High cure rates can be achieved in several ways: standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and the patients' preferences should be considered when management decisions are made. This paper describes firstly the management of primary seminoma and its nodal involvement and, secondly, the various therapeutic options according to stage.

[What's new in the treatment of seminomas?]

Pure testicular seminoma is a rare disease with an excellent prognosis. Its management is controversial. In stage I disease, several treatment options are considered. Those are radiation therapy alone, chemotherapy alone or active surveillance, which is becoming increasingly popular. For more advanced stages, treatment is based on chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. In this article, we review thoroughly the existing literature and recent recommendations the various treatment options, their advantages and disadvantages in different stages of the disease.

Posttreatment surveillance after paraaortic radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: a systematic analysis

CONTEXT

The extent and duration of routine follow-up after paraaortic (PA) radiotherapy for stage I seminoma remain controversial in terms of efficacy, costs of technical investigations and long-term morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the current literature assessing routine follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We identified all published reports on PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma (1986-2005). We analyzed time patterns of recurrence, sites and methods of detection of relapse, and follow-up programs used.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 11 publications reporting outcome in 2,280 patients. Median time to recurrence in 80 relapsing patients was 15.5 months. Less than 10% of recurrences were diagnosed beyond the third year of follow-up. Isolated locoregional or distant recurrence was observed in 52 and 20 patients, respectively, without significant difference in median time to relapse. 19 out of 43 recurrences with reported method of detection of relapse were diagnosed by routine technical investigations. There was no significant difference in time to relapse between those patients followed with low volume as compared to high-volume imaging protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that technical investigations in posttreatment surveillance should be restricted to the first 3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, surveillance programs with a high volume of imaging apparently do not lead to earlier detection or less advanced stage at the time of relapse as compared to protocols with low volume imaging.

What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Routine posttreatment surveillance is recommended after adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma. However, systematic studies on the value of follow-up in these patients are missing. This report addresses the efficiency of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma with particular reference to the mode of detection of relapse and the costs of posttreatment screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All follow-up investigations of a prospectively followed cohort of 675 patients with stage I seminoma treated with PA radiotherapy were analyzed with respect to the first indications of relapse, patterns of recurrence, risk factors of relapse, and cost-efficiency of the different technical examinations of the follow-up schedule over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

With a median time to follow-up of 61 months, recurrence was diagnosed by symptoms or physical examination in 14 out of 26 relapsing patients. Among the technical follow-up investigations abdominopelvic imaging had the highest detection rate for relapse, while thoracic imaging and marker analysis were inefficient. Abdominal sonography had the highest cost-efficiency of all technical follow-up investigations, while computed tomography (CT) scans were responsible for approximately 60% of all costs. The authors failed to identify risk factors predictive of relapse after adjuvant irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Routine technical investigations during follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma yield only a low detection rate of relapse from cancer. The data presented here provide no evidence for the value of technical follow-up beyond the 3rd year after treatment or routine screening of the chest. Thorough physical examination of the patients should be encouraged. Patients should be informed about potential symptoms indicative of recurrence. Restrictive use of abdominopelvic CT scans will reduce exposure to ionizing radiation and considerably increase the cost-efficiency of follow-up.

Cost-effectiveness of reduced follow-up in malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Considerable variability exists in the extent and frequency of follow- up examinations for melanoma patients between different countries, generating significantly different total costs and uncertain clinical benefits.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We have analyzed the follow-up of melanoma patients under clinical and economic aspects based on the latest recommendations of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the German Dermatologic Society (DDG) in the Düsseldorf cohort of 526 patients (stage IIII) during a 5-year follow-up period. Outcome measures were frequency of metastasis detection, most effective detection method, costs per detected metastasis and cost per quality-adjusted life year.

RESULTS

Structured follow-up detected 17 recurrences in stages I-III. Physical examination and lymph node ultrasound were the only cost-effective methods at all stages, while laboratory studies were generally not cost-effective. The implementation of a reduced, yet medically adequate follow-up reducing chest X-rays, abdominal ultrasound examinations and eliminating blood tests in early stages yielded savings of more than 100,000 euro (120,000 $) annually at a tertiary care university hospital.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a reduced follow-up for melanoma patients seems not only medically justified but also economically required without adversely affecting patient outcome.

Low-dose radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma—long-term results

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review retrospectively the results of low-dose radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma using four different fractionation schedules and target volume definitions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 191 patients underwent irradiation for histologically proven Stage I seminoma after undergoing an inguinal orchiectomy. Fractionation schedules were used one after another as follows: Total dose 30 Gy (dose/fraction 1.5 Gy, 16 patients), total dose 25.5 Gy (dose/fraction 1.5 Gy, 62 patients), total dose 20 Gy (dose/fraction 2 Gy, 69 patients), total dose 26 Gy (dose/fraction 2 Gy, 29 patients). The remaining 12 patients were excluded from this study. In the same period the target volume was gradually reduced. In 1983 the paraaortic, pelvic and inguinal regions were irradiated; later the target volume was reduced to the paraaortic region exclusively.

RESULTS

Overall survival and event-free survival were identical in all groups ranging from 95% to 100% /5 years. Three patients experienced a lymph node metastasis during follow-up, 3 patients a distant metastasis to the lung and the bones. Mild acute side effects were noted in 8% to 15% of the patients, and very mild long-term side effects in 1% to 5% of patients. Multivariate analysis showed no prognostic significance of total dose, dose per fraction, or target volume. In univariate analysis, a higher frequency of acute side effects to the skin and the bowel was related to a higher total dose, and an elevated frequency of nausea was related to a higher daily dose per fraction.

CONCLUSION

Using lower doses and limiting the target volume to the paraaortic region exclusively did not result in a worse prognosis in our patient series.

Efficacy of routine follow-up after first-line treatment for testicular cancer

To define guidelines for the follow-up management of patients treated for testicular germ cell tumor this study assessed characteristics of patients with recurrent disease. The charts of 505 patients with testicular cancer treated and followed-up at the University Medical Centre Nijmegen between 1982-2000 were reviewed retrospectively. In 42 patients disease recurrence was found during routine follow-up. In a subset of patients no recurrences were seen after first-line treatment: (a) pathological stage IIa nonseminoma patients who were adjuvantly treated with chemotherapy and (b) histologically confirmed complete responders after primary chemotherapy. Furthermore, in low-stage disease no intra-abdominal recurrences were seen in (a) pathological stage I nonseminoma patients and (b) low-stage seminoma patients who received radiotherapy. The risk of recurrent testicular cancer depends on primary therapy and efficacy of it; these results indicate a limited role for follow-up in pathological stage II nonseminoma patients adjuvantly treated with chemotherapy and in histologically confirmed complete responders after chemotherapy. Abdominal computed tomography does not appear necessary in routine follow-up of patients treated for low-stage testicular cancer.

Routine chest X-rays have no additional value in the detection of relapse during routine follow-up of patients treated with chemotherapy for disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer

BACKGROUND

The routine follow-up of patients with disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer (DNSTC) treated with the combination of orchidectomy, polychemotherapy, and if needed, resection of the residual mass, consists of regular physical examinations, chest X-rays (CXR) and tumor marker assessments. Most guidelines for this routine follow-up originate from multi-center trials. In order to estimate the value of CXR in the detection of tumor relapse after complete remission, we reviewed all patients with disseminated testicular cancer treated with chemotherapy at the University Hospital Groningen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients with DNSTC treated between February 1977 and February 1999 at our institution were reviewed. Two hundred and ninety (82.2%) patients, who were in complete remission after cisplatin-containing chemotherapy followed by, if necessary, resection of the residual mass, entered this analysis. The follow-up schedule consisted of regular physical examinations, tumor marker assessment (lactate dehydrogenase, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha-FP) and CXR. In all patients the first diagnostic sign of tumor relapse was documented.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 107 months (range 8-261) a tumor relapse was documented in 33 patients (11.4%). Median time to relapse was 17 months (range 6-179) after the start of chemotherapy. In 27 patients, tumor relapse was first detected by a rise in tumor markers. Two patients presented their relapse with neurological complaints. Both were diagnosed with brain metastasis. In four patients the relapse was detected by both increase in tumor markers and abnormalities in the physical examination. In none of the 33 relapsed patients was routine CXR during follow-up involved in the detection of tumor recurrence. All but one of the relapsed patients had elevated tumor markers before the start of chemotherapy. The total number of CXR made during follow-up in all 290 patients was 10 160; none were diagnostic for the detected relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that routine CXR has no additional value in the detection of tumor relapses during follow-up after chemotherapy in the subset of patients who present their DNSTC with increased tumor markers and are in complete remission after treatment. In order to save valuable resources, CXR can be omitted from the follow-up schedule after chemotherapy for marker-positive non-seminomatous testicular cancer in complete remission.

Long-term experience with carboplatin monotherapy for clinical stage I seminoma: a retrospective single-center study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term oncologic efficacy and morbidity of carboplatin monotherapy, which was introduced at our department 11 years ago for the treatment of Stage I seminoma. Radiotherapy is the standard treatment of patients with clinical Stage I seminoma. Carboplatin has been advocated as a treatment alternative to avoid the late side effects of radiotherapy and the high recurrence rate of surveillance strategies.

METHODS

From February 1990 until August 2001, 108 patients received two adjuvant cycles of single-agent carboplatin (400 mg/m2 body surface on days 1 and 22) 2 weeks after high inguinal orchiectomy. To assess for myelosuppression, complete blood counts were performed at least once a week until the nadir occurred after the second treatment cycle.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 59.8 months (range 6 to 134), 2 patients (1.85%) developed a recurrence (retroperitoneal tumor) within the first year. Both patients received cisplatin-based salvage chemotherapy. At last follow-up, all patients were alive without any evidence of disease. Carboplatin treatment was well tolerated by all patients and was associated with only mild gastrointestinal side effects. Leukopenia was noted in 32 patients (29.6%); 21 (19.4%) of these patients had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1, 8 (7.4%) had grade 2, 3 (2.8%) had grade 3, and none had grade 4. No patient developed neutropenic fever. Thrombocytopenia was observed in 48 patients (44.4%); of these patients, 38 (35.2%) had WHO grade 1, 5 (4.6%) had grade 2, 2 (1.9%) had grade 3, and 3 (2.8%) had grade 4.

CONCLUSIONS

From an oncologic standpoint, two cycles of carboplatin monotherapy was highly effective and very well tolerated by all patients.

The use of preferences to measure the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for stage I seminoma

PURPOSE

In Stage I seminoma, treatment with radiation therapy (RT) after radical inguinal orchiectomy reduces the likelihood of relapse by 15%, but does not improve survival, thus making quality of life an important outcome measure. The purpose of this study was to use utilities to assess the quality of life benefits associated with adjuvant RT in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred healthy men were interviewed using a utility assessment tool. Utilities for five health states were measured using the standard gamble technique: (A) adjuvant RT with 5% recurrence risk; (B) recurrence after RT, salvaged with chemotherapy; (C) orchiectomy alone with 20% recurrence risk; (D) recurrence after orchiectomy alone, salvaged with RT; and (E) recurrence after orchiectomy alone, salvaged with chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 25. Utilities were highest for nonrecurrent health states, and lowest for recurrence salvaged with chemotherapy. All differences in utilities between health states were significant, except between states A and C and B and E. Variability in utilities was not explained by the sociodemographic factors examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that healthy males do not value the 15% reduction in recurrence risk achievable with adjuvant RT. However, they do predict that an actual recurrence, especially one requiring salvage chemotherapy, will lead to significant decline in quality of life. We intend to use these utilities to further evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RT in this setting.

Follow-up of clinical stage I testicular cancer patients: cost and risk benefit considerations

BACKGROUND

Regardless of the way it is managed, a high cure rate has been achieved for recurrent low-stage testicular cancer. Achieving a balance between survival and the patient's inconvenience and expense during follow-up, has therefore become an important issue.

METHODS

Prognoses and recurrence patterns were investigated in 39 patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (NSGCT), and 82 patients with stage I seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (SGCT), who underwent high orchiectomy between 1970 and 1997 at our institution. We considered the cost benefits and the risks by reviewing our results together with other reported results.

RESULTS

Patients with clinical stage I NSGCT under surveillance showed no progression later than 4 years after orchiectomy. The ability to detect progression using chest X-ray alone appeared very low. There was no infradiaphragmatic recurrence after adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with stage I SGCT. Only two of 204 patients showed progression, which included eight of our patients who underwent two cycles of adjuvant carboplatin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Four years of intensive follow-up is probably sufficient for patients with stage I NSGCT under surveillance, and routine chest X-rays may be required only during the first year of surveillance. The benefit of using adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with stage I SGCT is that we could remove abdominal and pelvic CT scans from the routine follow-up protocol. Randomized trials will clarify whether the adjuvant carboplatin therapy is less toxic, provides better prognosis and is more cost-effective than adjuvant radiotherapy.