Carcinoid tumors of the ampulla of Vater: a comparison with duodenal carcinoid tumors

A rare case of neuroendocrine cell tumor mixed with a mucinous component in the ampulla of Vater

BACKGROUND

A rare case of neuroendocrine cell tumor (NET) having both conventional and mucinous components was reported. Mucinous NET is rarely encountered in the pathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Here we examined the mechanism for transformation of conventional NETs into mucinous NETs.

CASE PRESENTATION

Macroscopic examination revealed a tumor with ulceration in the ampulla of Vater that measured 1.7 cm in its largest diameter. Histologically, the tumor comprised two components: a tubular/ribbon-like feature and small nests floating in a mucinous lake. The tumor nests showed sheet, nest and ribbon-like structures of small cells having eosinophilic cytoplasm as well as small-sized nuclei with dense hyperchromatin. Immunohistochemical analysis showed tumor cells positive for pan-endocrine markers (synaptophysin, CD56, INSM1 and chromogranin). Based on the histological findings, the solid and mucinous components were diagnosed as conventional and mucinous NETs, respectively. Grading was NET G2 based on 12.8% and 13.2% Ki-67-positive cells in the solid and mucinous components, respectively. Immunohistochemically, the mucin phenotype of this tumor was gastric and intestinal. Only the mucinous NET component had cytoplasmic CD10 expression. Examination using a customized gene panel detected only a DPC4 mutation, which was limited to the mucinous component.

CONCLUSIONS

Coexistence of conventional and mucinous NETs could provide important insight into evaluating the NET subtype histogenesis. Moreover, molecular alterations including cytoplasmic expression of CD10 and the DPC4 mutation can contribute to interpretation of tumor pathogenesis.

Ampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Identification of Prognostic Factors in a Multicentric Series of 119 Cases

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the major and minor ampulla are rare diseases with clinico-pathologic features distinct from non-ampullary-duodenal NENs. However, they have been often combined and the knowledge on prognostic factors specific to ampullary NENs (Amp-NENs) is limited. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with metastatic potential and patient prognosis in Amp-NENs. We clinically and histologically investigated an international series of 119 Amp-NENs, comprising 93 ampullary neuroendocrine tumors (Amp-NETs) and 26 neuroendocrine carcinomas (Amp-NECs). Somatostatin-producing tubulo-acinar NET represented the predominant Amp-NET histologic subtype (58 cases, 62%, 12 associated with type 1 neurofibromatosis). Compared to Amp-NETs, Amp-NECs arose in significantly older patients and showed a larger tumor size, a more frequent small vessel invasion, a deeper level of invasion and a higher rate of distant metastasis, and, importantly, a tremendously worse disease-specific patient survival. In Amp-NETs, the WHO grade proved to be a strong predictor of disease-specific survival (hazard ratio: 12.61, p < 0.001 for G2 vs G1), as well as patient age at diagnosis > 60 years, small vessel invasion, pancreatic invasion, and distant metastasis at diagnosis. Although nodal metastatic disease was not associated with survival by itself, patients with > 3 metastatic lymph nodes showed a worse outcome in comparison with the remaining Amp-NET cases with lymphadenectomy. Tumor epicenter in the major ampulla, small vessel invasion, and tumor size > 16 mm were independent predictors of nodal metastases in Amp-NETs. In conclusion, we identified prognostic factors, which may eventually help guide treatment decisions in Amp-NENs.

Somatostatin-derived amyloidosis: a novel type of amyloidosis associated with well-differentiated somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumours

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinicopathologic and proteomic characteristics of a novel form of amyloidosis derived from the precursor protein somatostatin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases were identified by searching the Mayo Clinic amyloid liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) typing database from 1 January 2008 to 1 September 2020 for specimens with the amyloid signature proteins and abundant somatostatin, in the absence of other amyloid precursor proteins. All available medical records and pathologic materials were examined.

RESULTS

Somatostatin-derived amyloid deposits were found in four patients, two females and two males, with a median age of 61.5 years (range 47-73 years). One patient also had neurofibromatosis-1. The amyloid in each case was associated with a well-differentiated, somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumour arising in the small bowel or pancreas. The amyloid deposits were Congo Red-positive and were readily identified by LC- MS/MS analysis. Somatostatin was present exclusively in somatostatin-associated amyloid cases (p < .001), compared to small bowel and pancreas amyloidosis cases of other types. Long-term follow-up is available for one patient who is alive 6 years after initial presentation.

CONCLUSION

We propose that somatostatin-related amyloidosis is a novel localised human amyloid type that arises in association with well-differentiated somatostatin-producing enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Treatment of the associated neuroendocrine tumour may be adequate therapy for these patients.

Neuroendocrine tumor of the ampulla of Vater showing chronological endoscopic changes

We report a rare case of neuroendocrine tumor of the ampulla of Vater in a 53-year-old Japanese male. The patient was admitted to our institution for workup of presyncope secondary to anemia. Medical history was pertinent for coronary artery disease, for which he had drug eluting stents (DES) placed and was on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Upper endoscopic evaluation revealed bleeding from an erosion at the ampulla of Vater. Endoscopic therapy with epinephrine and thrombin injection allowed for successful hemostasis and repeat endoscopy 6 months later did not show any changes in lesion character. Repeat endoscopy at 1 year, however, revealed erythema and further erosion on the ampulla of Vater as the lesion had progressed. The patient was diagnosed with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Abdominal computed tomography showed a 9-mm hypervascular tumor at the ampulla of Vater and the patient underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy and lymphadenectomy. Histologically, the tumor consisted of small-sized round cell proliferations with a solid nest pattern. Immunostaining results indicated that the tumor cells were positive for synaptophysin and 2.5% were positive for Ki-67. The final diagnosis was sporadic non-functional neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1 of the ampulla of Vater. This case demonstrates that NET of the ampulla of Vater, while rare, can have significant changes and growth over time and highlights the importance of follow-up endoscopic evaluations.

Ampullary and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Series of Cases and Review of the Literature

The ampulla of Vater is a unique, highly vascularized pouch. Its anatomic transition is halfway along the second part of the duodenum from the foregut to the midgut. According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) latest nomenclature, carcinoid tumors are now called neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Knowledge of NETs is important because of their rarity, reclassification, prognosis, and management. NETs involving the ampulla of Vater are extremely rare, constituting <0.05% of gastrointestinal NETs, and involving the pancreas are rare to our knowledge. There are only a few reports of ampullary NETs.

We report two rare NET cases involving the ampulla and pancreas and review the relevant literature. A 71-year-old patient with neurofibromatosis and multiple comorbidities presented with chronic intermittent abdominal pain. Abdominal imaging studies showed a suspicious mass at the level of the ampulla. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound revealed bulging papillae. Histopathology of the biopsied mass revealed a low-grade NET. Given his multiple comorbidities, the patient was scheduled for endoscopic resection. Our second patient was an 83-year-old lady presenting with nausea and vomiting. Abdominal imaging studies revealed a lobular mass over the body of the pancreas. Histopathological examination of fine-needle aspiration of the mass confirmed a well-differentiated low-grade NET. Octreoscan and dotatate scans showed pancreatic, multiple hepatic and metastatic lesions in the left lung and left shoulder. The patient is currently stable after completing peptide receptor radioligand therapy at a tertiary oncology center. Because of the patients’ comorbidities and staging, their management has taken different approaches.

More data and more research are needed for accurate assessment of prognosis; however, a review of the latest literature recommends Whipple resection with lymphadenectomy for all ampullary NETs provided patients can tolerate the procedure. Endoscopic resection or surgical ampullary resection should be performed on contraindicated patients. The majority of ampullary and pancreatic NETs would have metastasized by the time patients sought treatment. Because of their rarity and ill-defined and highly variable presentation, NET diagnosis is always delayed and sometimes incidental; therefore, we emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and management to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Duodenal, ampullary, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Oncologic outcomes are driven by tumor biology and tissue of origin

BACKGROUND

Periampullary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from the duodenum, ampulla, and periampullary pancreas. Duodenal and ampullary NETs are rare and may have distinct biologic behavior from pancreatic NETs (P-NETs). We examined the outcomes of these entities.

METHODS

An institutional database was queried for patients undergoing resection for pancreatic head, duodenal, or ampullary NETs from 2000 to 2018. Patients with MEN1 syndrome or follow up less than 12 months were excluded.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ten patients were identified. Tumor locations were ampulla (n = 15), duodenum (n = 35) and pancreas (n = 260). Median follow-up and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 60.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 34.8-99.3) and 171.7 (IQR: 84.0-NR) months. Clinicopathologic data and survival outcomes were similar for duodenal and ampullary NETs (RFS: p = .347 and overall survival [OS]: p = .246) and were combined into an intestinal subtype (IS) group. There were no differences in OS or RFS when comparing IS-NET and P-NET. On multivariate analysis, tissue of origin was not associated with risk of recurrence. The current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging guidelines, which account for origin tissue, were predictive of outcomes for all subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Tissue of origin does not appear to impact long-term outcomes when comparing IS-NETs and P-NETs. The AJCC staging system offers good discriminatory capacity in the context of the tissue type.

Three Cases of Ampullary Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated by Endoscopic Papillectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

We herein report three cases of patients with an ampullary neuroendocrine tumor (NET), who underwent endoscopic papillectomy (EP). No tumor recurrence or metastasis was detected in the patients for more than two years after EP. Generally, surgical resection is recommended for ampullary NETs by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. However, as EP is less invasive than surgical resection, there are some reports of low-grade small ampullary NETs curatively treated by EP with long-term follow-up. We consider that EP may be a curative treatment for small and low-grade ampullary NETs without regional or distant metastasis.

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia: The rules for non-operative management

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) with favorable pathological and clinical features may be considered as indolent lesions, and therefore be amenable to conservative management. According to the primary tumor site, different non-aggressive approaches, based on endoscopic resection or simple active surveillance, can be proposed to selected patients fulfilling specific criteria. Tumor size, Ki67 proliferative index and depth of invasion are markers that can be used in order to identify these subjects. Patients with type I gastric NENs <1 cm as well as those with non-ampullary duodenal NENs <1 cm with no associated syndrome can be safely managed by endoscopic resection. On the other hand, an active surveillance approach is preferred over surgery for patients with asymptomatic, non-functioning pancreatic NENs ≤2 cm without dilation of the main pancreatic duct or bile duct. As far as NENs of the appendix are concerned, appendectomy should be considered as curative when a R0 resection has been achieved in the presence of a tumor ≤1.5 cm, graded as G1 and without lymphovascular invasion. Finally, G1 rectal NENs ≤1 cm without invasion of the muscular layer can be safely treated by endoscopic resection. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of the existence of indolent GEP-NENs, in order to avoid unnecessary operations with associated postoperative complications.

Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Patients with Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Background

This study was designed to predict prognosis of patients with primary duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (D-NENs) by developing nomograms.

Material/Methods

Patients diagnosed with D-NENs between 1988 and 2015 were queried from the SEER database and a total of 965 appropriate cases were randomly separated into the training and validation sets. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generated survival curves, and the difference among the groups was assessed by the log-rank test. Independent prognostic indicators were acquired by Cox regression analysis, and were used to develop predictive overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms. Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the efficacy of nomograms. Tumor stage was regarded as a benchmark in predicting prognostic compared with the nomograms built in this study.

Results

The C-index was 0.739 (0.690–0.788) and 0.859 (0.802–0.916) for OS and CSS nomograms, respectively. Calibration curves exhibited obvious consistency between the nomograms and the actual observations. In addition, C-index, AUC, and DCA were better than tumor stage in the evaluative performance of nomograms.

Conclusions

The nomograms were able to predict the 1-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS for D-NENs patients. The good performance of these nomograms suggest that they can be used for evaluating the prognosis of patients with D-NENs and can facilitate individualized treatment in clinical practice.

[Gastric neuroendocrine tumors]

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms. Currently, incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) is being significantly increased. There are 3 groups of gNETs: types I, II and III. Each type has important features regarding clinical picture, prognosis and treatment strategy. Type I is the most common (70-80%) and associated with chronic atrophic gastritis including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter associated atrophic gastritis. Type II (5-6%) is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN I - ZES). Both types are characterized by hypergastrinemia and small tumor dimension. These neoplasms are multiple and mostly benign. On the contrary, NETs type III (10-15%) is not associated with hypergastrinemia and represented by single large neoplasms. Tumors are malignant as a rule. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are preferred for these tumors. Endoscopic surgery followed by observation is acceptable for almost all NETS type I and II. At the same time, this approach is advisable only for small and highly differentiated neoplasms type III.

[Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors]

Significant augmentation of the incidence of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors duodenum has been observed in recent decades. There are 5 histological types of these tumors: gastrinoma (50-60%), somatostatin-producing tumor (15%), inactive serotonin-containing tumors (20%), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (<3%) and gangliocytic paraganglioma (<2%). The majority of tumors are localized within the bulb and postbulbar part of duodenum, 20% are found in periampular area. Treatment strategy depends on dimensions, localization, histological class, stage and type of tumor. It is believed that endoscopic resection is permissible for small inactive tumors (G1) located above major duodenal papilla. The majority of other neoplasms requires surgical resection. Personal experience of various surgeons is limited by small group of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to summarize results for selection of optimal treatment.

Current best practice in the management of neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare tumors that display marked heterogeneity with varying natural history, biological behavior, response to therapy and prognosis. Their management is complex, particularly as a number of them may be associated with a secretory syndrome and involve a variety of options. A number of factors such as proliferation rate, degree of differentiation, functionality and extent of the disease are mostly utilized to tailor treatment accordingly, ideally in the context of a multidisciplinary team. In addition, a number of relevant scientific societies have published therapeutic guidelines in an attempt to direct and promote evidence-based treatment. Surgery remains the treatment of choice with an intention to cure while it may also be recommended in some cases of metastatic disease and difficult to control secretory syndromes. Long-acting somatostatin analogs constitute the main treatment for the majority of functioning tumors, whereas specific evolving agents such as telotristat may be used for the control of carcinoid syndrome and related sequelae. In patients with advanced disease not amenable to surgical resection, treatment options include locoregional therapies, long-acting somatostatin analogs, molecular targeted agents, radionuclides, chemotherapy and recently immunotherapy, alone or in combination. However, the ideal time of treatment initiation, sequence of administration of different therapies and identification of robust prognostic markers to select the most appropriate treatment for each individual patient still need to be defined.

Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a still poorly recognized clinical entity

BACKGROUND

Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) are rare tumors, which usually show good prognosis. The optimal management of these tumors is still far from being clearly understood because of their rarity and the poor level of knowledge about their natural history. Herein, we have reviewed the literature on dNENs to collect and analyze the current data on epidemiology, diagnosis and management of these rare tumors.

METHODS

Bibliographical searches were performed in PubMed, using the following keywords: duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasm; duodenum; gastrinoma; diagnosis; therapy; guidelines. We searched for all relevant articles published over the last 15 years. Non-English language papers were excluded.

RESULTS

We reviewed the pertinent articles about dNENs. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy is the cornerstone of the dNENs diagnostic process. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration/biopsy should be performed in order to locally stage the disease and in all cases of non-diagnostic endoscopy. Endoscopic or complete surgical removal of the primary lesion is the recommended treatment and is generally achievable for the majority of the patients. A less aggressive approach may be suggested for well-differentiated low-stage tumors. After NEN removal, patients should be closely followed-up especially during the first 3 years by endoscopic examination, imaging tests and CgA measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-disciplinary approach and the preservation of the quality of life of the patients play a key role in the therapeutic process for dNENs. Further studies are needed to better define standardized guidelines specific to dNENs, including optimal management approaches and follow-up intervals.

Periampullary Neuroendocrine Tumor as a Cause of Acute Pancreatitis

Patient: Male, 60

Final Diagnosis: Periampullary neuroendocrine tumor

Symptoms: Abdominal discomfort

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Surgery

Outcomes of Surgical and Endoscopic Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs): a Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (dNETs) comprise about 2% of all the NETs. Treatment of dNETs involves resection of the tumour either by endoscopic or surgical resection. Surgical or endoscopic local resection of the lesion is usually a more conservative and less morbid option compared with a more radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, inadequate clearance by local resection might result in recurrent disease with reduced overall survival.

METHODS

The current systematic review compared the differences in outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER), local resection (LR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the management of dNETs. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using MeSH keyword combinations: 'duodenal', AND, 'neuroendocrine tumours'. All relevant articles published up to 2016 were included. Post-operative morbidity, R0 resection status and recurrence rates were the outcomes assessed.

RESULTS

Eight non-randomised retrospective studies with 335 participants were included (LR = 122; PD = 118; ER = 64). While PD was associated with higher morbidity compared with LR (27/64 vs. 10/74; P = 0.002), PD was associated with a higher incidence of an R0 resection (3/97 vs. 15/97; P = 0.007) as well as lower recurrence rates (3/51 vs. 6/46; P = 0.21). ER was associated with a higher positive resection margin status versus LR (22/51 vs. 14/91; P = 0.0002). Recurrence at follow-up was not different among patients with dNETs who underwent PD versus LR.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical surgical resection in the form of PD was associated with higher post-operative morbidity among patients with dNETs yet provided better margin clearance. Patients with dNETs need systematic evaluation with a view to obtain most of the information about the prognostic factors in order to tailor the treatment options.

Laparoscopic resection of duodenal carcinoid: A feasible method: Single institute case series

Background

Duodenal carcinoids (neuroendocrine tumour) are rare tumour, but recently, increase in incidence has been noted. Various techniques for excision of tumour have been described in literature, but very few case reports and case series have mentioned about laparoscopic management of carcinoid tumour. We describe a case series of seven cases of duodenal non-periampullary carcinoids which was managed by laparoscopic method.

Aims

The aim of the study was to check feasibility of laparoscopic management of duodenal carcinoid and technique of surgery.

Settings and Design

This study design was a case series and prospective data were retrospectively collected.

Materials and Methods

A total of 7 patients were operated for carcinoid tumour of duodenum mainly involving first part by laparoscopic method from February 2016 to January 2017. All patients were followed up for minimum 1-year period and various pre-operative, intra-operative findings and post-operative outcome were noted.

Results

Out of seven patients, 6 patient were managed by laparoscopic duodenotomy and transduodenal excision whereas one patient required duodenectomy of first part. Mean operative time was 99 min, mean intraoperative blood loss was 55.7, mean hospital stay was 99.7 and no recurrence in a 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic excision of carcinoid tumour is safe, technically reproducible and feasible method.

Management of Well-differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEPNETs): A Review

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are heterogeneous tumors that arise from the neuroendocrine cells of the digestive tract and other organs, such as the lung, ovary, and thyroid glands. They can be well differentiated or poorly differentiated, and management of these tumors differs for each histologic subtype. We have performed a review of NETs and focused on management of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) and carcinoid syndrome.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed to obtain articles on the management of well-differentiated NETs. Using the key words neuroendocrine tumors, carcinoid, pNET, octreotide, somatostatin analogues, and radiolabeled therapy, we reviewed Phase II and III trials that were published over the past 30 years. We also reviewed guidelines from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, North America Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network in our search.

FINDINGS

NETs are usually slow-growing tumors that remain asymptomatic for a long duration and can be either nonfunctioning or functioning. Surgical resection is recommended for locoregional disease, impending obstruction, symptom control, and advanced disease. Nonsurgical treatment options include somatostatin analogues (SSAs), multikinase inhibitors, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and radiolabeled SSAs. Carcinoid syndrome is mainly treated with SSAs.

IMPLICATIONS

Although GEPNETs are slow-growing tumors, most patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, and therefore it is important that the management of each patient be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting to optimize the treatment strategy. Patients should be considered for clinical trials and refractory cases referred to a specialty center.

Well-Differentiated, Non-Functional, Non-Ampullary Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Toward Defining Evaluation and Management

INTRODUCTION

Nonfunctional, non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs) are rare neoplasms, and specific treatment recommendations are less clear than for other NETs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients (pts) with a diagnosis of dNET, excluding hormonally functional, ampullary, and high-grade tumors. Clinical data were evaluated to identify factors that might impact clinical staging and predictors of metastases.

RESULTS

Thirty-six pts were identified. Surgical resection was performed in 28 and endoscopic resection in 8. LNs were included in specimens of 19/28 (68 %) pts who underwent surgical resection (median #LNs 5, range 1-12). Of these 19 pts, 5 (26 %) were found to be LN+. Of LN+ pts, all had tumors ≤2 cm. When compared to LN- pts, LN+ pts were more likely to have muscularis propria (MP) invasion (80 vs. 23 %, p = 0.04). Tumor size, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and multifocality were similar between LN+ and LN- patients. No pt was found to have distant metastases. Heterogeneity in clinical staging modalities and small number of pts evaluated prohibited meaningful analysis of most appropriate preoperative imaging. At a median follow-up of 25 months (range 9-139), no patient developed recurrence or experienced disease-specific death.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-functional, non-ampullary dNETs, particularly those with MP invasion, have a propensity to metastasize to regional LNs. However, these neoplasms appear to have a favorable prognosis. Further evaluation of preoperative imaging is required to better determine most appropriate clinical staging. A suggested workup and management strategy for prospective evaluation is proposed.

Multimodality Imaging Findings in Carcinoid Tumors: A Head-to-Toe Spectrum

Carcinoid tumors are a rare biologically heterogeneous group of neuroendocrine tumors with a spectrum ranging from benign indolent to aggressive metastatic tumors. They belong to the category of amine precursor uptake and decarboxylase tumors, or apudomas. The most common sites for primary locations are the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts; however, any organ can be involved. The clinical presentation depends on location, aggressiveness, production of biologically active amines and peptides, paraneoplastic syndromes, and tendency for metastasis. Their reported age-adjusted incidence has increased in recent years, partly due to improved detection at radiologic imaging and endoscopy. Not a ll neuroendocrine cell tumors are carcinoids. Numerous systems have been proposed regarding their nomenclature and classification. Cross-sectional and functional imaging plays an important role in diagnosis, lesion characterization, and staging. Awareness of nomenclature, classification, common sites of involvement, and imaging presentation are pivotal for making the diagnosis. Knowledge of the diverse clinical, pathologic, and radiologic spectrum of carcinoid tumors involving various organs of the body is important for diagnosis and patient management. ^©RSNA, 2017.

Neuroendocrine tumor of the ampulla of Vater with distant cystic lymph node metastasis: a case report

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the ampulla of Vater are rare and difficult to diagnose. We report a rare case of a small NET of the ampulla of Vater with metastasis to distant lymph nodes.

Case presentation

The patient was a 54-year-old man complaining of epigastric pain and melena. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a bulging papilla with active bleeding, which was diagnosed as a well-differentiated NET of the ampulla of Vater. An approximately 10-mm hypervascular tumor at the ampulla of Vater and a 41-mm cyst adjacent to the wall of the jejunum were revealed by abdominal computed tomography. We performed pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymph node dissection. Macroscopic examination revealed a 9-mm tumor of the ampulla of Vater and a 52-mm cyst adjacent to the wall of the jejunum. Histological examination revealed that the cyst was a lymph node metastasis. The final diagnosis was non-functional NET G1 of the ampulla of Vater, designated T1N1M0 stage IIIB. Postoperatively, the patient underwent no treatment and has had no recurrence for 4 years.

Conclusions

This case demonstrates that sporadic NETs of Vater’s papilla have aggressive metastatic potential even with a small primary lesion, and radical resection with lymphadenectomy is recommended for all cases.

Is there an Optimal Surgical Approach to Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Ampulla? A Single Institution Experience over 15 Years

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the ampulla of Vater are rare neoplasms accounting for a small fraction of gastroenteropancreatic NETs. The optimal surgical approach remains controversial. This study aimed to define the optimal approach in patients with ampullary NETs. Patients who underwent resection of ampullary NETs from 2000 to 2014 were analyzed. Fourteen patients with well-differentiated, nonfunctional NETs were identified. The mean age was 60 ± 15 years, and nine (64%) were male. The mean tumor size was 1.6 ± 0.9 cm and the majority (61%) had an advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage. Eight (57%) patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and six (43%) underwent transduodenal ampullectomy (TA). Although the mean tumor size was similar (1.7 vs 1.5 cm), the majority (75 vs 20%) of PD patients demonstrated a trend toward more aggressive tumors, characterized by advance T stage in 25 vs 0 per cent, lymph node positivity in 88 vs 17 per cent, and elevated proliferative index (Ki-67) in 25 vs 0 per cent. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in all PD patients versus 75 per cent in TA patients. There was no difference in major complication rate (50 vs 33%). In the TA group, one (17%) patient recurred and two (33%) patients died, whereas only one (13%) patient died in the PD group and no patients recurred. In conclusion, ampullary tumors can be aggressive tumors characterized by high regional lymph node involvement. A transduodenal approach may provide an inadequate oncological resection and thus has the potential to understage ampullary NETs. In the era of increasing therapeutic options for gastroenteropancreatic NETs, accurate staging is crucial and appropriate oncologic resection via PD for ampullary NETs should be considered.

A Multi-institutional Analysis of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Tumor Biology Rather than Extent of Resection Dictates Prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with poorly defined management. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing resection of duodenal NETs.

METHODS

Using a multi-institutional database, 146 patients who underwent resection for duodenal NETs between 1993 and 2015 were identified. Data on clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Local surgical resection (LR) was performed in 57 (39.0 %) patients, while 50 (34.3 %) patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 39 (26.7 %) patients an endoscopic resection (ER). Factors associated with worse RFS included advanced tumor grade and metastasis at diagnosis (both P < 0.05) but not procedure type (P > 0.05). Among patients who had at least one lymph node examined (n = 85), 50 (58.8 %) had a metastatic lymph node; lymph node metastasis (P = 0.04) and advanced tumor grade (P = 0.04) were more common among patients with tumors >1.5 cm. Median length-of-stay was longer for PD versus LR (P < 0.001). PD patients were at increased risk for severe postoperative complications (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of duodenal NETs was dependent on tumor biology rather than procedure type. PD was associated with a longer hospital stay and higher risk of perioperative complications. For patients with tumors ≤1.5 cm, LR or ER may be appropriate with PD reserved for larger lesions and those not amenable to a more local approach.

Surgical management of neuroendocrine tumors

During the last decades an increase in the incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) was observed. Gastroenteropancreatic NETs represent the majority of NETs. Compared with their epithelial counterpart they usually have a more indolent behaviour and surgical resection improves survival. Tumor diameter is one of the main parameter in the decision making process for nonfunctioning forms. Generally, small lesions can be treated conservatively whereas larger tumors should be treated with standard surgical resection and lymphadenectomy. Functioning tumors should be resected regardless the dimension of the lesion. Locally advanced and metastatic disease should be also treated with extended resections, keeping in consideration the grading, size, Ki67, and presence of extra-abdominal disease. In the case of metastases the panel of operative treatment includes resection, ablation, up to liver transplantation.

Coincident liposarcoma, carcinoid and gastrointestinal stromal tumor complicating type 1 neurofibromatosis: Case report and literature review

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is associated with increased risk of multiple neoplasms. We present a case of a female patient with NF1 who presented with a rectal low-grade neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumor. Computed tomography imaging found a well-differentiated liposarcoma and a well-circumscribed gastro-intestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Although GIST and carcinoid tumors are frequently found in NF1 patients, liposarcoma complicating NF1 is quite rare and this is the first reported case of well-differentiated liposarcoma in NF1. In summary, we report a case of coincident abdominal carcinoid tumor, GIST and well-differentiated liposarcoma, which illustrates the variability of neoplasms in NF1 patients.

Pathologic grade and tumor size are associated with recurrence-free survival in patients with duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors are rare and few studies exist to guide surgical management. This study identifies factors associated with recurrence after resection.

METHODS

A retrospective, single institution review was performed between 1983 and 2011 on patients with a pathologic diagnosis of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor. Tumor grade was assigned based on WHO 2010 criteria (Ki-67 and mitotic rate).

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were identified that underwent curative resection. This included 12 patients with endoscopic mucosal resection, 34 that had local resection, and 29 that underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Two-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 84 and 81%, respectively. There were 11 tumor recurrences (either local or distant), and four patients died of their disease (3/4 had high-grade lesions) with an overall median follow-up of 27 months. On univariate analysis, tumor size and tumor grade were identified as being associated with recurrence, but not intervention type, lymph node metastases, ampullary location, or margin status.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor grade and size are associated with recurrence-free survival in duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. When feasible, a less aggressive surgical approach to treat low-grade and low-stage duodenal NETs should be considered.

Clinical outcomes for neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and ampulla of Vater: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Previous case series report that neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the ampulla of Vater have worse overall survival (OS) than NETs in the duodenum. We aimed to compare the OS of patients with ampullary NETs to patients with duodenal NETs.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 1988 to 2009. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

Ampullary NETs (n = 120) were larger (median size 18 vs. 10 mm, p < 0.001), higher grade (poorly and undifferentiated tumor 42 % vs. 12 %, p < 0.001), higher SEER historic stage (distant metastasis 16 % vs. 7 %, p < 0.001), and more often resected (78 % vs. 60 %, p < 0.001) than duodenal NETs (n = 1,360). Median OS was significantly worse for patients with ampullary NETs than with duodenal NETs (98 vs. 143 months, p = 0.037). Local resection was performed for 50.5 % of the resected ampullary NETs and resulted in similar OS compared to locally resected duodenal NETs (HR 1.37, 95 % CI 0.76-2.48, p = 0.291).

CONCLUSIONS

While ampullary NETs are more advanced at presentation and have worse OS than duodenal NETs, long-term survival is possible with proximal small bowel NETs. For locally resected NETs, OS is similar between ampullary and duodenal NETs.

Duodenal carcinoid with carcinoid syndrome

Carcinoid tumours are uncommon well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours. Primary duodenal carcinoids account for less than 2% of all gastrointestinal carcinoids. Duodenal carcinoids are seldom associated with carcinoid syndrome. We report a rare case of duodenal carcinoid presenting as a carcinoid syndrome in a middle-aged man with upper abdominal pain, hot flushes, diarrhoea and dry cough. Endoscopy-guided biopsy and 24 h urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) proved the diagnosis. He was further evaluated and managed with definitive surgical treatment.

Carcinoid tumor of the duodenum: a rare tumor at an unusual site. Case series from a single institution

CONTEXT

Duodenal carcinoids are extremely rare, and their characteristics and biological behavior have not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with resected duodenal carcinoids.

METHODS

Twenty patients (12 females and 8 males) were investigated. Their average age was 66.4 ± 5.8 years old (43 to 88 years old). The data corresponding to the clinical picture, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with duodenal carcinoid tumors subjected to resection over a period of 18 years (1993-2011) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most common symptoms were dyspepsia (50%) and epigastric pain (45%) followed by weight loss (10%) and vomiting (5%). Carcinoid syndrome was not observed in any patient. The lesion was located on the first part of the duodenum in 15 (75%) patients, the second part in 4 (20%) patients, and the third part in 1 (5%) patient. The diagnosis of a carcinoid tumor was established through an endoscopic excision biopsy in 19 (95%) patients and an histopathological examination of the surgical specimen in 1 (5%) patient. The average tumor size was 1.1 cm ± 0.4 cm (0.3 cm to 6.0 cm). Nineteen (95%) patients were initially treated by endoscopic resection of the duodenal lesion. One patient (5%), whose tumor was on the third part of the duodenum underwent a duodenectomy of the third and fourth duodenal parts and duodenojejunal anastomosis. The duodenal carcinoid resection margin was involved in four (20%) patients. Four (20%) patients were subjected to a partial gastrectomy to fully remove the lesion. The tumor was restricted to the submucosal layer in 16 (80%) cases, and it penetrated into the muscular layer in 4 (20%) cases. All patients exhibited positive chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, and/or synaptophysin immunostaining. The average duration of the follow-up period was 39.6 months (3 to 96 months). Twelve (60%) of the 20 cases in this series are alive without any evidence of active disease. Only one (5%) patient died due to liver metastases of the duodenal carcinoid.

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenal carcinoids are rare and indolent tumors usually associated with a benign progression. Duodenoscopy, computerized tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound should be performed to evaluate the tumor size, the level of wall invasion, and the presence of regional or distant lymphatic metastases. Endoscopic removal of tumors smaller than 1.0 cm without periampullary localization or evidence of muscular propria layer invasion assessed by histology and/or endoscopic ultrasound is recommended. The endoscopic resection with a carcinoid tumor size between 1.0 cm and 2.0 cm can be incomplete and require new endoscopic resection or even surgical removal. Duodenal carcinoid larger than 2.0 cm require full-thickness resection and concomitant lymphadenectomy.

Gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumours

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in frequency and have a varied spectrum with regard to histology, clinicopathologic background, stage, and prognosis. They are usually discovered incidentally, are for the most part benign and are associated with hypergastrinaemia (secondary either to chronic atrophic gastritis or rarely Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; types 1 and 2, respectively) or more rarely sporadic type 3. Applications of recent staging and grading systems - namely using Ki-67 proliferative indices - (from ENETS and WHO 2010) can be particularly helpful in further categorising these tumours. The natural history of Type 1 gastric carcinoids is generally (>95%) favourable and simple surveillance is usually recommended for small (<1 cm) T1 tumours, with local (endoscopic or surgical) resection for larger lesions. Other potential therapies such as somatostatin analogues and gastrin receptor antagonists may offer newer therapeutic possibilities. Rarely, gastric NENs have a malignant course and this is usually confined to Type 2 and especially Type 3 tumours; the latter mimic the biological course of gastric adenocarcinoma and require radical oncological therapies. Most duodenal NENs, apart from gastrinomas (that are not dealt with here) are sporadic and non functional. They are also increasing in frequency probably due to incidental discovery at endoscopy or imaging for other reasons and this may account for their overall good prognosis. Peri-ampullary and ampullary NENs may have a more aggressive outcome and should be carefully appraised and treated (often with surgical resection).

A 12-mm carcinoid tumor of the minor duodenal papilla with lymph node metastases

Carcinoid tumors located in the minor duodenal papilla are extremely rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature. Herein, we report the case of a 71-year-old man with a 12-mm carcinoid tumor at the minor duodenal papilla with lymph node metastases. Multidetector-row computed tomography with contrast enhancement revealed a 12-mm well-enhanced tumor in the duodenum. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a 12-mm submucosal tumor at the minor papilla of the duodenum. Biopsy specimens revealed a carcinoid tumor, and a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy was performed. Carcinoid tumors at the minor duodenal papilla have a high prevalence of nodal disease, even for tumors <2 cm in diameter. Therefore, we believe that radical resection with tumor-free margins (i.e. pancreatoduodenectomy) is the treatment of choice.

Neuroendocrine tumours of the ampulla of Vater: clinico-pathological features, surgical approach and assessment of prognosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Neuroendocrine tumours occur very rarely in the ampulla of Vater and their clinical behaviour is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the clinico-pathological features, surgical approach and prognosis of these patients.

METHODS

Six patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the ampulla of Vater treated with curative intent surgery at a single centre were retrospectively analysed. A univariate analysis of potential prognostic factors was also performed (data provided from the present study and literature review).

RESULTS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy was curative in all the patients. Overall and disease-free survival rates were significantly better for G1/G2 tumours (p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively). Although frequent, lymph node metastases did not influenced both overall (p = 0.760) and disease-free survival rates (p = 0.745). No significant differences of survival were observed in patients with ENETS stage I/II disease, as compared to ENETS stage III disease (p = 0.169 and p = 0.137, respectively). No differences were observed according to UICC staging system (p = 0.073 and p = 0.177, respectively). Tumours that are less than 2 cm or limited to the ampulla appear to have a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The WHO 2010 classification appear to accurately predict patient prognosis, while the ENETS or UICC staging systems have a limited value (especially in regard to lymph node metastases). Radical surgery (i.e. pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy) should be the standard approach in most patients with NET of the ampulla of Vater because this procedure removes all the potential tumour-bearing tissue.

Neoplasms associated with germline and somatic NF1 gene mutations

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis 1 is a tumor predisposition genetic syndrome with autosomal dominant inheritance and virtually 100% penetrance by the age of 5 years. NF1 results from a loss-of-function mutation in the NF1 gene, resulting in decreased levels of neurofibromin in the cell. Neurofibromin is a negative regulator of various intracellular signaling pathways involved in the cellular proliferation. Although the loss of heterozygosity in the NF1 gene may predispose NF1 patients to certain malignancies, additional genetic alterations are a prerequisite for their development. The precise nature of these additional genetic alterations is not well defined, and genetic testing of all malignancies in NF1 patients becomes an essential component of future research in this subset of patients. In addition to germline NF1 mutations, alteration of the somatic NF1 gene is associated with sporadic malignancies such as adenocarcinoma of the colon, myelodysplastic syndrome, and anaplastic astrocytoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive English and non-English language search for all articles pertinent to malignancies associated with NF1 was conducted using PubMed, a search engine provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health. Key words searched included the following: "malignancies associated with NF1", "tumors associated with NF1", and "NF1 and malignancies". A comprehensive analysis in terms age and mode of presentation, investigation and therapeutic modalities, and outcome of the published data was performed and compared with similar information on the sporadic cases.

RESULTS

Malignancies in NF1 patients typically occur at an earlier age and, with an exception of optic pathway gliomas, certain types of malignancies carry a poor prognosis compared with their sporadic counterparts. Malignancies are the leading cause of death in NF1 patients, resulting in a 10- to 15-year decreased life expectancy compared with the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of well-defined screening tests for early detection and the nonspecific clinical presentation contributes to a poorer outcome in malignancies associated with NF1. Small study group size, mixed patient population, and a lack of uniformity in reporting research results make comparison of treatment outcome for this group difficult. An International Consensus Meeting to address and recommend best practices for screening, diagnosis, management, and follow-up of malignancies associated with NF1 is needed.

Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The old and the new WHO classifications distinguish between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. All well-differentiated neoplasms, regardless of whether they behave benignly or develop metastases, will be called neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and graded G1 (Ki67 <2%) or G2 (Ki67 2-20%). All poorly differentiated neoplasms will be termed neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and graded G3 (Ki67 >20%). To stratify the GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs regarding their prognosis, they are now further classified according to TNM-stage systems that were recently proposed by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the AJCC/UICC. In the light of these criteria the pathology and biology of the various NETs and NECs of the gastrointestinal tract (including the oesophagus) and the pancreas are reviewed.

The rare malignancy of the hepatobiliary system: ampullary carcinoid tumor

Introduction. Carcinoid tumors are low-grade tumors originating from endoderm and mostly involving the gastrointestinal system. However; they may be seen in any site within the gastrointestinal system. Case Presentation. A 69-year-old female patient. The results of blood tests were observed to be consistent with obstructive jaundice. A mass appearance was not encountered on tomographic examination. Papilla that was tumor-like macroscopically was seen in the second part of the duodenum in diagnostic endoscopy. Pylorus—preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy surgical procedure was applied. On pathological examination of the mass, a tumoral mass was detected in ampulla vateri localization, 1.5 × 1 × 0.8 cm in size, which, in immunohistochemical staining, was evaluated as a neuroendocrine tumor. Also, Metastasis was observed. Conclusion. The rarest type of carcinoid tumor is ampullary located carcinoid tumor, and tumor size is not a reliable indicator for tumor aggressivity in ampullary carcinoid tumors.

Carcinoid tumors of the extrahepatic biliary tract: report of four cases

Carcinoid tumors located in the biliary tree are exceedingly rare, accounting for 0.2%-2% of all gastrointestinal carcinoids. This study describes four cases of carcinoid tumors of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Four carcinoid tumors arising in the common bile duct (Case 1, 59-year-old man), gallbladder (Case 2, 49-year-old man; Case 3, 65-year-old man), and ampulla of Vater (Case 4, 52-year-old woman) were studied. All of the cases were misdiagnosed before surgery as proximal bile duct cancer, stomach cancer with liver metastasis, gallbladder cancer, and adenocarcinoma of ampulla of Vater, respectively. The clinicopathological characteristics and clinical course were reviewed. Treatment depends on the location of the tumor and the extent of the disease. Aggressive surgical therapy with a curative intention therefore offers the only chance for cure and has to be considered whenever possible.

Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum and the ampulla of Vater: current diagnostic and therapeutic approach in a series of 8 patients. Case series

AIM

To describe the specific characteristics of duodenal/perivaterian carcinoids and to analyze the diagnostic/therapeutic approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight patients were included in our study. Symptoms on admission included dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and anemia. All patients underwent upper GI endoscopy and gastrointestinal peptides (gastrin) and neuroendocrine markers (Chromogranin-A, CgA) measurement. Imaging studies were performed in all patients, including OCTREOSCAN, while in patients with ACs MRCP or ERCP was also performed, when necessary. Definite diagnosis was confirmed by histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

Polypoid masses (carcinoids) were revealed at duodenal bulb and ampulla of Vater, in 5 and 3 patients, respectively. Serum gastrin was moderately increased in 4 patients, while in one patient it was more than 1000 pg/ml. Serum CgA was moderately increased in one patient, in whom OCTREOSCAN detected a solitary hepatic metastasis. Two patients with DC, of less than 1 cm of diameter, were treated by endoscopic polypectomy, while all the other patients underwent surgery. The patient with hepatic metastasis and positive OCTREOSCAN received also Octreotide LAR, resulting in stabilization of disease. No recurrence or metastases were observed during follow-up (range : 1.5-9.6 years).

CONCLUSIONS

In DC tumors <1 cm endoscopic excision with close follow-up is an adequate treatment, while in tumors >1 cm and in AC, surgical resection is the treatment of choice. In metastatic tumors, resection of the primary lesion with administration of somatostatin analogues may stabilize the disease and improve patient's quality of life.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowels are on the rise: Early aspects and management

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel are on the rise. In the US they have increased by 300%-500% in the last 35 years. At the same time their prognosis is much improved. Today, most neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the duodenum are detected "incidentally" and therefore recognized at an early stage. Duodenal NETs which are well differentiated, not larger than 10 mm and limited to the mucosa/submucosa can be endoscopically resected. The management of duodenal NETs ranging between 10 and 20 mm needs an interdisciplinary discussion. Endoscopic ultrasound is the method of choice to determine tumor size and depth of infiltration. Surgery is recommended for well-differentiated duodenal NET tumors greater than 20 mm, for localized sporadic gastrinomas (of any size) and for localized poorly differentiated NE cancers. Surgery is recommended for any ileal NET. Advanced ileal NETs with a carcinoid syndrome are treated with long-acting somatostatin analogs. This treatment significantly improves (progression-free) survival in patients with metastatic NETs of the ileum. For optimal NET management, tumor biology, type, localization and stage of the neoplasm, as well as the patient's individual circumstances have to be taken into account.

Carcinoid tumor of the minor papilla in complete pancreas divisum presenting as recurrent abdominal pain

Background

Tumors of the minor papilla of the duodenum are extremely rare, and they are mostly neuroendocrine tumors, such as somatostatinomas and carcinoid tumors. However, true incidence of carcinoid tumors in minor papilla might be much higher, because patients with minor papillary tumors usually remain asymptomatic. We report a very unusual case of carcinoid tumor in a patient with complete pancreas divisum with a review of the literature.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old female patient was referred for evaluation of pancreatic duct dilatation noted on abdominal ultrasonography and computerized tomography. She complained of intermittent epigastric pain for 6 months. A MRCP and ERCP revealed complete pancreas divisum with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. On duodenoscopy, a small, yellows, subepithelial nodule was visualized at the minor papilla; biopsy of this lesion revealed a carcinoid tumor. She underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. The histologic evaluation showed a single nodule, 1 cm in diameter, in the submucosa with duodenal and vascular invasion and metastasis to the regional lymph nodes.

Conclusion

Although the size of the carcinoid tumor was small and the tumor was hormonally inactive, the concomitant pancreas divisum led to an early diagnosis, the tumor had aggressive behavior. Carcinoid tumors of the minor papilla should be included in the differential diagnosis of recurrent abdominal pain or pancreatitis of unknown cause.

Long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for endocrine tumors of the ampulla of Vater and minor papilla

OBJECTIVE

Endocrine tumors of the ampullary region are rare, and accurate indications for their management are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment in this indication.

METHOD

We reviewed all patients who submitted to a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary endocrine tumors between 1982 and 2003 in our center.

RESULTS

Eight patients, 3 men and 5 women, with a mean age of 47.8 years (range, 37-57 years) were included. Two patients presented with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and 1 had neurofibromatosis. Operative mortality was nil. The mean size of the tumors was 17.4 mm (range, 5-40 mm). There were 7 well-differentiated and 1 poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas. Seven patients had satellite lymph node metastases, and 1 had diffuse liver metastases. Median follow-up was 131 months (range, 17-315 months). At the end of the follow-up period, 5 patients were alive and disease-free; 1 patient was alive with stable liver metastases. Two patients died 17 months and 13 years after surgery, respectively, from metastasis and an unrelated cause.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the high frequency of lymph node invasion in these uncommon tumors, even at an early clinical stage. Pancreaticoduodenectomy may result in prolonged survival of patients with well-differentiated tumors.

Endocrine carcinoma of the major papilla: report of two cases and review of the literature

To date, about 100 cases of ampullary NET are reported in International literature. These tumors can cause symptoms mainly secondary to their periampullary location. Up to 25% of patients have von Recklinghausen's disease. Carcinoid syndrome is uncommon, unless hepatic metastasis is present. Determination of histopathology is of utmost importance and involves specific immunohistochemical staining. The published data indicate that these tumors, metastasize in approximately half of cases irrespective of primary tumor size. Therefore, radical excision in the form of pancreaticoduodenectomy is recommended regardless of tumor size. Local excision should be confined to patients unable to tolerate more extensive surgery. We here report two case of ampullary neuroendocrine tumors presenting as melena and painless jaundice respectively in a 51-year old man and in a 54-year old man and review the relevant literature, giving special attention to the morphologic features, clinical characteristics, and treatment modalities associated with this disease process.