Patterns of central nervous system recurrence in patients with systemic human immunodeficiency virus-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Lessons from Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection in cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic tool for EBV-induced central nervous system dysfunction among HIV-positive patients

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) remains vital for evaluating active EBV infection involving the central nervous system (CNS). CSF EBV DNA was often found in conjunction with other microbial infection affecting the CNS among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Sometimes CSF EBV DNA is detectable in patients without neurological symptoms. This review focused on the clinical and laboratory features of CNS EBV infection among patients with HIV, and discussed various types of EBV-associated CNS infections, and predominant neoplasms involving CNS such as primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), CNS-non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, smooth muscle tumors and leiomyosarcomas, EBV encephalitis or myelitis, EBV meningitis and EBV coinfection with other causative agents were also included. Furthermore, the metagenomic next-generation sequencing technique with high sensitivity for the detection of pathogenic coinfection in the CSF were also reviewed. We concluded that CSF EBV-DNA detection with high sensitivity and specificity could be a useful diagnostic tool for CNS lymphoma among HIV patients; however, it is still unknown for other CNS diseases. We further summarized and conclude that positive CSF EBV-DNA detection combined with specific brain focal lesions could be a minimally invasive method to diagnose PCNSL. The occurrence of positive CSF EBV-DNA was influenced by PCR detection limit, PCR methods, immunocompromised status, the possible influence of anti-herpetic therapy and anti-HIV therapy, and the size and location of a tumor mass. Uniform PCR methods as vital diagnostic tools and optimal EBV-DNA load threshold need to be established.

Efficacy and safety of prophylactic high-dose MTX in high-risk DLBCL: a treatment intent-based analysis

Despite central nervous system (CNS) relapse occurring in >10% of high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, the role of CNS-directed prophylaxis is controversial in the absence of randomized controlled trials. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) on CNS relapse and survival outcomes in 258 newly diagnosed R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-treated high-risk DLBCL patients, based on the initial treatment intent (ITT) of the physician on the use of prophylactic HD-MTX. Patients were classified into an ITT HD-MTX group (n = 128) and a non-ITT HD-MTX group (n = 130). The CNS relapse rate was not significantly different between these groups, with 2-year CNS relapse rates of 12.4% and 13.9%, respectively (P = 0.96). Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates in the ITT HD-MTX and non-ITT HD-MTX groups were 62.4% vs 64.5% (P = 0.94) and 71.7% vs 71.4% (P = 0.7), respectively. Also, propensity score-matched analyses showed no significant differences in the time-to-CNS-relapse, progression-free survival, or overall survival. The ITT HD-MTX group showed a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 oral mucositis and elevated alanine aminotransferase. Prophylactic HD-MTX does not improve CNS relapse rate or survival outcomes in high-risk DLBCL patients, and it is accompanied by increased toxicities.

Central nervous system involvement in AIDS-related lymphomas

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is reportedly more common in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphomas (ARL). We describe factors and outcomes associated with CNS involvement at baseline (CNS(B) ) and relapse (CNS(R) ) in 886 patients with newly diagnosed ARL. Of 886 patients, 800 received either intrathecal (IT) therapy for CNS(B) or IT prophylaxis. CNS(B) was found in 13%. CNS(B) was not associated with reduced overall survival (OS). There was no difference in the prevalence of CNS(B) between the pre-combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and cART eras. 5·3% of patients experienced CNS(R) at a median of 4·2 months after diagnosis (12% if CNS(B) ; 4% if not). Median OS after CNS(R) was 1·6 months. On multivariate analysis, only CNS(B) [hazard ratio (HR) 3·68, P = 0·005] and complete response to initial therapy (HR 0·14, P < 0·0001) were significantly associated with CNS(R) . When restricted to patients without CNS(B) , IT CNS prophylaxis with 3 vs. 1 agent did not significantly impact the risk of CNS(R) . Despite IT CNS prophylaxis, 5% of patients experienced CNS(R) . Our data confirms that CNS(R) in ARL occurs early and has a poor outcome. Complete response to initial therapy was associated with a reduced frequency of CNS(R) . Although CNS(B) conferred an increased risk for CNS(R) , it did not impact OS.

Epstein-Barr viral load in cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic marker of central nervous system involvement of AIDS-related lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

AIDS-related lymphoma (ARL) often involves the central nervous system (CNS). Although the diagnostic value of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in detecting HIV-positive primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) has been established, its usefulness for identifying CNS involvement of systemic ARL remains elusive. In this study, we evaluated the utility of the EBV-DNA load in CSF in identifying CNS involvement in patients with systemic ARL.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological data of consecutive ARL patients managed at our clinic between January 1998 and June 2012. Sixty-two patients with ARL, including eight PCNSL patients and 52 systemic ARL patients, and 63 controls underwent CSF EBV-DNA load evaluations before receiving chemotherapy. ARL-related CNS involvement was defined as any lesion diagnosed histologically or radiologically as a lymphoma in the brain, meninges, spine, cranial nerves or oculus.

RESULTS

A cut off value of 200 copies/mL predicted the presence of CNS lesions with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 85% in both the PCNSL and systemic ARL patients, while a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 93% were obtained for systemic ARL. A cut off value of 2,000 (3.30 log) copies/mL provided the best specificity (100%), with a sensitivity of 50%.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the clinical utility of evaluating the quantitative EBV-DNA load in the CSF for the diagnosis of CNS involvement of systemic ARL as well as PCNSL.

Phase 2 study of intrathecal, long-acting liposomal cytarabine in the prophylaxis of lymphomatous meningitis in human immunodeficiency virus-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) develop central nervous system (CNS) progression or recurrence during the course of their disease. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-NHL often develop CNS progression despite the use of prophylaxis. Liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyte) has shown activity in lymphomatous meningitis, but there are limited data for prophylaxis.

METHODS

Between May 2006 and December 2008, a phase 2 study of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine was performed at the dose of 50 mg in 30 patients with HIV-NHL, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and activity for prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Liposomal cytarabine was well tolerated, with headache grade I to III being the most frequent side effect in 40% of patients. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months, only 1 (3%) patient developed a combined systemic and meningeal recurrence. The use of liposomal cytarabine allowed significant reduction of the number of lumbar injections in comparison to the standard schedules (around 50%), improving the quality of life of patients and reducing the professional exposure risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study on prophylaxis of lymphomatous meningitis in HIV-NHL, liposomal cytarabine seems safe and active; it reduces by approximately 50% the number of lumbar punctures, and exposure risk for health staff as well.

Metastatic neurologic complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Neurologic complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma represent challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issues. Leptomeningeal, epidural, and brain metastases are the most common neurologic complications, and each is associated with a poor prognosis. However, early recognition and intervention often result in improved quality of life and, for a subset of patients, an opportunity for longer survival.

CNS prophylaxis in lymphoma: Who to target and what therapy to use

The purpose of this article is to review the current data on the risk of CNS relapse in patients with lymphoma and the efficacy of CNS directed prophylactic therapy. CNS relapse occurred in 30-50% of those with Burkitt lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma prior to the introduction of intensified regimens that include CNS prophylaxis. Most patients with AIDS-related-lymphoma receive a short course of intrathecal prophylaxis but a re-evaluation of type and targeting of CNS prophylaxis is needed. Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a 5% overall risk of CNS relapse but a high risk sub-population can be identified on the basis of raised LDH and >1 extranodal site, testicular or primary breast involvement. CNS prophylaxis for selected patients with DLBCL may be justified by risk but its benefit is not yet proven. Intravenous methotrexate > or = 3 g/m(2) achieves therapeutic levels in CSF and parenchyma and in combination with intrathecal methotrexate would be a reasonable option for prophylaxis.

AIDS-related malignancies: emerging challenges in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients are at increased risk of developing cancer, particularly in the later stages of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Despite the advent of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), malignancy in this population is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (ARL) are the most common AIDS-defining malignancies. AIDS-related KS varies from minimal to fulminant disease. Treatment decisions for AIDS-related KS are guided largely by the presence and extent of symptomatic disease. In addition to HAART, excellent treatments exist for both localized disease (topical gel, radiotherapy, and intralesional therapy) and advanced disease (liposomal anthracyclines, paclitaxel). Novel therapies that have become available to treat AIDS-related KS include angiogenesis inhibitors and antiviral agents. ARL comprises a heterogeneous group of malignancies. With the immune restoration afforded by HAART, standard-dose chemotherapies now can be safely administered to treat ARL with curative intent. The role of analogous treatments used in HIV-negative patients, including monoclonal antibodies and autologous stem cell transplantation, requires further clarification in HIV-positive patients. HIV-infected patients also appear to be at increased risk for developing certain non-AIDS-defining cancers, such as Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Although the optimal treatment of these neoplasms is at present uncertain, recent advances in chemotherapy, antiretroviral drugs, and supportive care protocols are allowing for more aggressive management of many of the AIDS-related cancers. This article provides an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment of various AIDS-related malignancies that are likely to be encountered by an oncologist practicing in the current HAART era.

Central nervous system chemoprophylaxis in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: current practice in the UK

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a well-recognised complication. There is no consensus regarding indications for prophylaxis or a standard CNS chemoprophylaxis regimen. Current UK practice was evaluated using a questionnaire. A total of 223 questionnaires were sent to clinicians who administered chemotherapy to patients with NHL; 158 (71%) evaluable questionnaires were returned. The overwhelming majority of respondents used prophylaxis in all cases of lymphoblastic lymphoma (97%) and Burkitt lymphoma (96%). Ninety-six per cent of respondents required risk factors to be present before prophylaxis was initiated in cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The commonest risk factor was site of involvement (paranasal sinus 88%, testicular 85%, orbital cavity 78%, bone marrow 65% and bone 28%). Other risk factors included stage IV, high International Prognostic Index score, >1 extranodal site and raised lactate dehydrogenase levels (34%, 21%, 16% and 10%). A total of 82% did not give prophylaxis in follicular lymphoma and 90% used intrathecal chemotherapy as their preferred method of prophylaxis. The most popular regimen was 12.5 mg methotrexate with each cycle of chemotherapy for six courses. Thirty-nine per cent used systemic chemotherapy for CNS prophylaxis either alone (4%) or as an adjunct to intrathecal prophylaxis (35%). These variations in the indications and methods of prophylaxis indicate that this subject deserves further review.

Leukemic and lymphomatous meningitis: incidence, prognosis and treatment

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer. Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms in NM, NM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis and therefore staging and treatment need encompass all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Central nervous system (CNS) staging of NM includes contrast enhanced cranial computerized tomography (CE-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MR-Gd), contrast enhanced spine magnetic resonance imaging (MR-S) or computerized tomographic myelography (CT-M) and radionuclide CSF flow study (FS). Treatment of NM involves involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (i.e. methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside and thio-TEPA) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of NM is palliative with an expected median patient survival of 4 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM. In patients with leukemia or lymphoma, prophylaxis of the CNS is used (utilizing a combination of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and intra-CSF chemotherapy) for patients at high risk as defined by specific tumor-related laboratory markers. Using such a risk-stratified approach, the late occurrence of CNS relapse has decreased dramatically attesting to the value of CNS prophylaxis.

Leptomeningeal metastases from leukemias and lymphomas

Leptomeningeal dissemination of lymphoma and leukemia differs from that of solid tumors in a number of clinically important aspects. Specific histologic variants of lymphoma and leukemia have such a high incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination that assessing CSF cytology at diagnosis is crucial and prophylactic therapy of the CSF compartment is required. Furthermore, while the overall prognosis for patients with leptomeningeal metastases from leukemia and lymphoma is similar to solid tumors, selected patients have excellent response to therapy and attain durable remission. Therefore, aggressive treatment is warranted.

AIDS-related cancer in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART): a model of the interplay of the immune system, virus, and cancer. "On the offensive--the Trojan Horse is being destroyed"--Part B: Malignant lymphoma

The impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on the incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was less obvious initially, although primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has dropped precipitously since the introduction of HAART. The pathogenesis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related lymphoma is multifactorial. Epstein-Barr virus plays a significant role in these diseases, especially Burkitt lymphoma and PCNSL. Data regarding the effect of HAART on the natural history and treatment outcomes of these malignancies are emerging. The possibility of direct and indirect roles of human immunodeficiency virus in the carcinogenesis suggests that antiretroviral therapy may be an important component of the treatment for these malignancies. The simultaneous administration of HAART and chemotherapy does not appear to significantly alter the toxicity profile, although the information with respect to the interaction of HAART and chemotherapy is limited. The use of biological agents, for example, monoclonal antibody against CD-20, is being explored to improve the clinical outcome of this disease.

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-related lymphoma with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and its co-administration with chemotherapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related lymphoma has lead to the exploration of potentially curative combination chemotherapy and myeloablative therapy followed by autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Applying the same principles used for patients with HIV-negative aggressive lymphoma, in 1998 we developed a program of high-dose therapy and ASCT at City of Hope for patients with HIV-related lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. Our studies have primarily included patients with chemosensitive lymphoma in relapse or first remission with poor-risk features at diagnosis. Filgrastim (G-CSF)-primed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and apheresis have been successful while patients were receiving HAART and chemotherapy. To date, ASCT has been performed in 19 patients with HIV-related lymphoid malignancies, representing the largest single-institution experience reported to date. Most patients received a chemotherapy-based conditioning regimen consisting of high-dose carmustine, etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Early infections, namely bacteremias and neutropenic fever were similar to those observed in the HIV-negative transplant setting. Opportunistic infections were rare and easily treatable. There were three early deaths, two from relapsed lymphoma and one from multi-organ failure in an older patient. The remaining 16 patients are alive and in remission. In summary, ASCT is well tolerated, can result in long-term remissions, and is potentially curative in selected HIV-related lymphoma patients with chemosensitive relapse and high-risk disease in first remission defined by the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index criteria (i.e., two or three of the following: elevated LDH, advanced stage, and poor performance status). Acquisition of resistance to HAART remains as a potential problem for HIV-positive patients who are cured of their lymphoma.

Therapeutic approaches to AIDS-related malignancies

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has changed dramatically the landscape of HIV disease. Deaths from AIDS-related diseases have been reduced by 75% since protease inhibitor therapy and combination antiretroviral therapy came into use in late 1995. While KS is declining, the situation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is more complex with a reduced incidence of primary central nervous system lymphoma, but a relatively stability in the number of patients developing systemic NHL. AIDS related NHL appears not to be markedly decreased by the introduction of HAART and it is the greatest therapeutic challenge in the area of AIDS oncology. The emphasis has now shifted to cure while maintaining vigilance regarding the unique vulnerability of HIV-infected hosts. Furthermore, also for the prolongation of the survival expectancy of these patients, other non AIDS-defining tumors, such as Hodgkin's disease, anal and head and neck, lung and testicular cancer, and melanoma have been recently reported with increased frequency in patients with HIV infection.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome–Related Lymphoma in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

The treatment and outcome of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection altered dramatically in the mid-1990s with the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Highly active antiretroviral therapy, where available, has led to a dramatic decline in mortality from HIV and a decrease in the incidence of opportunistic infections and Kaposi sarcoma. This article addresses the effects that HAART has had on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Metaanalysis of numerous cohort studies confirmed that the incidence of AIDS-related NHL has decreased since the advent of HAART. This decline is most marked for primary cerebral lymphomas and systemic immunoblastic lymphoma but has not been demonstrated for Burkitt lymphoma. In addition to genetic predisposing factors, age, nadir CD4 cell count, and lack of HAART therapy predict the development of NHL. The clinical presentation of AIDS-related NHL has not changed, but several institutions have reported an improvement in survival since the introduction of HAART. Moreover, HAART has been combined safely with systemic chemotherapy in the management of NHL, and this approach results in a more modest decrease in immune function than when chemotherapy is administered alone. This has led to a more aggressive approach to the management of AIDS-related NHL and response rates and overall survival durations that are approaching those seen in stage-matched high-grade lymphomas in the immunocompetent population.

CNS prophylaxis and treatment in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: variation in practice and lessons from the literature

Practices regarding central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis and treatment for non-"high-grade" lymphomas are not standardized. We designed a survey to address the CNS surveillance, prophylaxis and treatment (S + P + T) habits of Ontario oncologists, to compare tertiary with community care and gauge interest in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We mailed 145 questionnaires to oncologists/hematologists registered at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario between 1980 and 1999. The questionnaire posed questions of S + P + T for a variety of histologies, locations and risk factors. Results showed that 49/77 respondents treated adult NHL, (19 community, 30 tertiary care). Surveillance LP's were commonly done in testicular, orbital, sinus and epidural sites of presentation (76, 69, 71, 80%, respectively), but these were less commonly prophylaxed (45, 33, 29 and 41%). HIV associated NHL received surveillance and prophylaxis by 51 and 33% of respondents. Stage IV disease, increased LDH and extranodal-sites warranted infrequent S + P. IT chemotherapy via LP was the most commonly used form of prophylaxis (74%) or treatment (84%). Twenty percent used systemic agents that cross the blood brain barrier for prophylaxis, and 45% for treatment. A vast heterogeneity of practice within and between tertiary care and community physicians' practices was documented. Ninety percent of physicians indicated willingness to participate in a RCT. In conclusion, CNS surveillance and prophylaxis in non-"high-grade" NHL is highly variable, probably because there are poorly defined risk factors, inconclusive prophylaxis efficacy and the inconvenience/toxicity of therapy. Patients at high risk by International prognostic index criteria are at an increased risk for CNS relapse. A RCT comparing standard chemotherapy with or without CNS prophylaxis in selected patients is needed.

Leptomeningeal disease in AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinicopathological features associated with leptomeningeal disease in systemic AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and to compare outcomes to those without leptomeningeal disease. In addition to evaluate intrathecal chemoprophylaxis for patients with good immunological parameters and high risk of meningeal relapse (bone marrow, paraspinal or paranasal involvement or Burkitt's lymphoma histology).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective data, which has been collected on our cohort of 8640 HIV seropositive patients treated at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital includes 176 patients with systemic AIDS-related NHL, was analysed.

RESULTS

At presentation, 18 (10%) patients had meningeal involvement. There were significant associations between meningeal disease and both Burkitt's lymphoma and paraspinal or paranasal involvement. There was no difference in the overall survival between patients with or without meningeal involvement at presentation (Kaplan-Meier log-rank, P = 0.35) and the 1-year actuarial survivals are 25% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3-47%] for patients with meningeal involvement and 33% (95% CI, 26-41%) for those without. Prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy was administered to 21 high-risk patients and four (19%) relapsed with meningeal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-centre experience of a large cohort has demonstrated that meningeal involvement at presentation correlates with Burkitt's lymphoma histology and paraspinal or paranasal space disease, but not with bone marrow lymphoma. It also documents that long-term survival is achievable rarely in patients who present with meningeal disease and in patients with isolated meningeal relapse.

Management of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

The incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in individuals infected with HIV is approximately 60- to 100-fold increased over the general population. The majority of patients with AIDS-related lymphoma (ARL) present with stage III-IV disease and with B-symptoms. They often have multiple extranodal localisations, with a high incidence of central nervous system involvement. Histologically, most tumours are either diffuse large cell lymphomas or Burkitt lymphomas. Several factors, such as disrupted immune surveillance, Epstein-Barr virus infection, chronic antigenic stimulation, cytokine dysregulation and the acquisition of genetic lesions, are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis. Patients with ARL have a poor prognosis: overall survival ranges from 1.5 to 18 months. The most important adverse prognostic factors are poor performance status, a low CD4+ cell count and a history of opportunistic infections. Results of treatment with polychemotherapy compare unfavourably to results in patients without HIV infection. Since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), there appears to be a decrease in the incidence of ARL. In addition, the use of HAART in combination with chemotherapy and the use of new treatment modalities may improve the outcome of this disease.

Clinical aspects and management of AIDS-related lymphoma

The incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is increased by approximately 100-fold in patients with advanced HIV infection. Clinical presentations may include systemic lymphoma, primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, and primary effusion lymphoma. Systemic lymphoma is the most common presentation, is almost always of intermediate or high-grade histology and B-cell phenotype, and usually involves extranodal sites. The disease is potentially curable with combination chemotherapy used for immunocompetent patients with lymphoma, although cure is achieved in only approximately 10-35% of patients. Primary CNS lymphoma may be difficult to distinguish from cerebral infection. The prognosis is very poor, although approximately 10% of patients selected for therapy may survive beyond 1 year with brain irradiation. Attention to infection prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy is important. Evidence suggests that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has resulted in a decreased incidence of lymphoma, and that patients with systemic lymphoma treated in the post-HAART era have a better prognosis.

Systemic chemotherapy for HIV-associated lymphoma in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Treatment of AIDS-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma poses a complex and multifaceted challenge for the physician. Treatment responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy are relatively poor, relapse rates are high, and AIDS progression continues to be a major concern in patients receiving dose-intensive antilymphoma therapy. The recent advances in anti-HIV therapy have not seen a clear counterpart in improved antilymphoma therapy, but trials are underway that may help move this field forward. For patients who achieve a complete and durable response to antilymphoma therapy, potent antiretroviral therapy may help improve the prognosis from AIDS progression. Major questions persist, however, on the role of chemotherapy dose intensity, the best use of antiretroviral therapy during the administration of lymphoma therapy, and the optimal design of studies that can address these questions.