The stenotic stent: mechanisms and revascularization options

Current Role of Laser Angioplasty of Restenotic Coronary Stents

Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) with conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) causes significant recurrent neointimal tissue growth in 30-85%. Therefore, laser ablation of intrastent neointimal hyperplasia before balloon dilation can be an attractive alternative. However, the long-term outcomes of such treatment have not been studied thoroughly enough. This prospective case-control study evaluated angiographic and clinical outcomes of PTCA alone and a combination of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and adjunct PTCA in 125 patients with ISR. ELCA was performed before balloon dilation in 67 patients, PTCA alone was performed in 58 patients. Basic demographic and clinical data were comparable in both groups. Lesions included in ELCA group were longer (17.1 ±9.9 vs 13.6 ±9.1 mm; p=0.034), more complex (36.5% type C stenoses vs 14.3%; p=0.006), and more frequently had reduced distal blood flow (TIMI <3: 18.9% vs 4.8%; p=0.025) compared to lesions in the PTCA group. Immediate angiographic results of PTCA and ELCA + PTCA appeared to be comparable. PTCA alone was successful in 57 patients (98.3%), ELCA + PTCA, in 66 patients (98.5%). The rates of hospital complications were comparable (3.0% in ELCA group vs 8.6% in PTCA group). The 1-year follow-up showed that the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were comparable in the 2 groups (37.3% in ELCA group vs 46.6% in PTCA group). The rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR) within 1 year after the intervention were also similar in the 2 groups (32.8% vs 34.5%). The data mean that ELCA in patients with complex ISR is efficient and safe. Despite a higher complexity of lesions in the ELCA group, no increase in the rate of complications was registered.

Finite element modeling of a novel self-expanding endovascular stent method in treatment of aortic aneurysms

A novel large self-expanding endovascular stent was designed with strut thickness of 70 μm × 70 μm width. The method was developed and investigated to identify a novel simpler technique in aortic aneurysm therapy. Stage 1 analysis was performed after deploying it in a virtual aneurysm model of 6 cm wide × 6 cm long fusiform hyper-elastic anisotropic design. At cell width of 9 mm, there was no buckling or migration of the stent at 180 Hg. Radial force of the stents was estimated after parametric variations. In stage 2 analysis, a prototype 300 μm × 150 μm stent with a cell width of 9 mm was chosen, and it was evaluated similarly after embedding in the aortic wall, and also with a tissue overgrowth of 1 mm over the stent. The 300/150 μm stent reduced the peak wall stress by 70% in the aneurysm and 50% reduction in compliance after embedding. Stage 3 analysis was performed to study the efficacy of stents with struts (thickness/width) 70/70, 180/100 and 300/150 μm after embedding and tissue overgrowth. The adjacent wall stresses were very minimal in stents with 180/100 and 70/70 μm struts after embedding. There is potential for a novel stent method in aortic aneurysm therapy.

Zotarolimus (ABT-578) eluting stents

Drug-eluting stents have revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology and have provided a significant innovation for preventing coronary artery restenosis. Polymer coatings that deliver anti-proliferative drugs to the vessel wall are key components of these revolutionary medical devices. This article focuses on the development of stents which elute the potent anti-proliferative agent, zotarolimus, from a synthetic phosphorylcholine-based polymer known for its biocompatible profile. Zotarolimus is the first drug developed specifically for local delivery from stents for the prevention of restenosis and has been tested extensively to support this indication. Clinical experience with the PC polymer is also extensive, since more than 120,000 patients have been implanted to date with stents containing this non-thrombogenic coating. This review provides background on pre-clinical studies with zotarolimus, on the development of the biocompatible PC polymer and on the clinical trials conducted using two stent platforms which deliver this drug to patients with coronary artery disease.

Directional coronary atherectomy vs. rotational atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries

Management of in-stent restenosis has become a significant challenge in interventional cardiology. Since the mechanism of in-stent restenosis is predominantly intimal hyperplasia, debulking techniques have been used to treat this condition. This study is a nonrandomized comparison of the immediate and long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA; n = 58) vs. high-speed rotational atherectomy (ROTA; n = 61) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in either group. DCA resulted in a larger postprocedural minimal luminal diameter of (2.57 +/- 0.51 vs. 2.14 +/- 0.37 mm; P < 0.0001) and a larger acute gain (1.83 +/- 0.52 vs. 1.42 +/- 0.48 mm; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, 12-month clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (39% vs. 21%; P = 0.02) and long-term follow-up MACE (44% vs. 28%; P = 0.03) was greater in the ROTA group. The present study suggests that DCA appears to be superior to ROTA for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries. Compared to ROTA, the debulking effect of DCA leads to a larger postprocedure minimal luminal diameter, and a lower incidence of subsequent target lesion revascularization and MACE.

Standalone cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of stent-related restenosis: acute results and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates

Despite excellent acute reperfusion results, 20%-30% of patients who undergo coronary stent implantation will develop angiographic restenosis and may require same additional treatments. Cutting Balloon angioplasty (CBA) causes less histological damage outside of the incised area than a regular balloon. However, regular plain old balloon angioplasty is sometimes required before CBA, as is adjunctive stenting and adjunctive angioplasty. These adjunctive strategies may negate the advantages of CBA. There is little data available on CBA as a standalone therapy for stent-related restenosis (SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates following standalone CBA in a patient population treated for SRS and in whom optimal acute results were obtained. In this study, 40 patients with SRS (54 lesions) underwent standalone CBA with optimal acute results. For all lesions, coronary angiography was conducted before and after a standalone CBA procedure for SRS and systematically during 3-6 months to assess recurrent angiographic restenosis rates in the study population. In the study lesions, SRS was either diffuse disease (> 15 mm; 52%) or focal type (48%). Cutting Balloon diameter was 3.20 +/- 0.44 mm and maximal inflation pressure 8.7 +/- 1.2 atm. Ratio of Cutting Balloon diameter to restenotic stent diameter was 0.996 +/- 0.487. Multiple inflations (6 +/- 3 times) were performed. Number of used Cutting Balloon was 1.02 +/- 0.14. Complications were as follows; one non-Q-wave MI (1.9%); 0 death (0%), and 17 repeat target lesion revascularizations (TLRs; 32%). Follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) was not attained for one patient. The angiographic recurrent restenosis rate was 34%, with a higher rate observed when the SRS was diffuse type, 50% vs. 16% for focal-type SRS (P < 0.01). The recurrent restenosis rate for smaller vessels (vessel diameter < or = 3.0 mm) was the same as for larger ones. At follow-up CAG, diffuse-type recurrent restenosis (56%) presented nearly as frequently as that presenting in the original SRS lesions (52%). But four diffuse-type SRS (29%) changed into focal-type recurrent stenosis. In this study, standalone CBA for SRS with optimal acute results was associated with an angiographic restenosis rate of 34%. Diffuse-type disease had a higher recurrent restenosis rate. When CBA achieves acute optimal results, adjunctive stenting or adjunctive PTCA are not always necessary, particularly when the SRS is focal. As a result of CBA, some diffuse-type SRS may change into focal-type recurrent stenosis by the time of the next intervention.

Feasibility of photopheresis to reduce the occurrence of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a clinical pilot study

BACKGROUND

Photopheresis was evaluated as a means of preventing restenosis on the basis of immune modulation.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial analyzing clinical restenosis at 6 months after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Seventy-eight patients with single-vessel angioplasty were randomly assigned to a control group of 41 patients and a treatment group of 37 patients. At 6 months, there were 72 evaluable patients: 39 control patients and 33 treated. Twenty-nine control patients received balloon PTCA only and 10 patients received stents. Twenty treated patients received PTCA only and 13 patients received stents. Baseline clinical characteristics of both groups were similar. The treatment group received photopheresis for a total of 5 treatments. Primary end points were death from any cause, myocardial infarction, ischemia, and repeat revascularization procedures.

RESULTS

By intention-to-treat analysis, clinical restenosis occurred in 27% of control patients versus 8% of treated patients (P =.040, relative risk = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Photopheresis therapy in patients undergoing balloon PTCA with and without stent deployment has been shown to be effective in reducing restenosis. The use of photopheresis in such patients merits further investigation.

Clinical and angiographic outcome in the laser angioplasty for restenotic stents (LARS) multicenter registry

In-stent restenosis (ISR), when treated with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) alone, has an angiographic recurrence rate of 30%-85%. Ablating the hypertrophic neointimal tissue prior to PTCA is an attractive alternative, yet the late outcomes of such treatment have not been fully determined. This multicenter case control study assessed the angiographic and clinical outcomes of 157 consecutive procedures in 146 patients with ISR at nine institutions treated with either PTCA alone (n = 64) or excimer laser assisted coronary angioplasty (ELCA, n = 93)) for ISR. Demographics were similar except more unstable angina at presentation in ELCA-treated patients (74.5% vs. 63.5%; P = 0.141). Lesions selected for ELCA were longer (16.8 +/- 11.2 mm vs. 11.2 +/- 8.6 mm; P < 0.001), more complex (ACC/AHA type C: 35.1% vs. 13.6%; P < 0.001), and with compromised antegrade flow (TIMI flow < 3: 18.9% vs. 4.5%; P = 0.008) compared to PTCA-treated patients. ELCA-treated patients had similar rate of procedural success [93 (98.9% vs. 62 (98.4%); P = 1.0] and major clinical complications [1 (1.1%) vs. 1 (1.6%); P = 1.0]. At 30 days, repeat target site coronary intervention was lower in ELCA-treated patients (1.1% vs. 6.4% in PTCA-treated patients; P = 0.158), but not significantly so. At 1 year, ELCA-treated patients had similar rate of major cardiac events (39.1% vs. 45.2%; P = 0.456) and target lesion revascularization (30.0% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.646). These data suggest that ELCA in patients with complex in-stent restenosis is as safe and effective as balloon angioplasty alone. Despite higher lesion complexity in ELCA-treated patients, no increase in event rates was observed. Future studies should evaluate the relative benefit of ELCA over PTCA alone for the prevention of symptom recurrence specifically in patients with complex in-stent restenosis.

Clinical and angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis and repeat target lesion revascularisation in small coronary arteries

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries and repeat target lesion revascularisation.

DESIGN

Patients with in-stent restenosis in coronary arteries < or = 2.85 mm were eligible for the study and underwent target lesion revascularisation. Clinical and angiographic variables were assessed during a six month follow up period.

RESULTS

73 patients with 79 lesions were treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (47%), excimer laser angioplasty (25%), or restenting (28%). The mean (SD) reference diameter before target lesion revascularisation was 2.12 (0.5) mm. Procedural success was achieved in all cases, but 57% of the patients had restenosis after six months. The rate of further restenosis was higher with laser angioplasty (78%) than with restenting (47%) or balloon angioplasty alone (49%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment for in-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries is feasible and safe, with a second restenosis rate comparable to large coronary artery series. The strategy of target lesion revascularisation influences further in-stent restenosis, with an increased rate with laser angioplasty compared with restenting and repeat dilatation alone.

Irradiation and postangioplasty restenosis: a recent overview

One of the most intriguing developments in recent years towards prevention of restenosis after angioplasty is the use of ionizing radiation. The background for the use of radiation treatment for this application is sound, since radiation is used not only to treat malignant cancerous growths but also is used for treatment of benign hyperplastic disorders such as post-surgical keloid formation and recurrence of pterygium after surgical removal. Restenosis can be considered a form of overexuberant wound healing triggered by angioplasty. Ionizing radiation inhibits serum-stimulated proliferation of many cell types including fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in vitro and also suppresses the synthesis of collagen by cultured fibroblasts. Liermann who showed inhibition of post-stent restenosis first used ionizing radiation for restenosis prevention clinically in iliac and iliofemoral arteries. Subsequently, extensive animal studies in various restenosis models have shown a profound inhibitory effect of catheter-based radiation (endovascular brachytherapy) on neointima formation and overall vessel shrinkage (negative remodeling). Based on these results clinical trials have been initiated with several types of devices and isotopes. Among these are 192Ir, 32P, 90Y, 90Sr/Y and 188Re. Additionally, radioactive stents have been developed; devices for clinical use are made radioactive at the microCi level by surface implantation of 32P ions. Results from early clinical trials are encouraging and brachytherapy appears safe for clinical use and at an appropriate dose, may be highly effective for restenosis prevention.

Coronary revascularization in heart transplant recipients by excimer laser angioplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Aggressive development of allograft coronary artery disease is a major cause of death in heart transplant recipients. Percutaneous balloon angioplasty is considered suboptimal for complex lesions in native coronary vessels and heart transplant recipients, alike. Excimer laser energy (308-nm wavelength) can successfully remove and vaporize atherosclerotic plaques in native coronary vessels; however, its application in heart transplant recipients has not been studied clinically yet.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six heart transplant recipients underwent percutaneous excimer laser (CVX-300, Spectranetics, Colorado Springs, CO) coronary angioplasty for treatment of a total of 10 discrete, obstructive coronary artery lesions. By using concentric or eccentric multifiber laser catheters, energy parameters were set at a fluence of 45 mJ/mm(2) or 60 mJ/mm(2) with a frequency of 25 Hz and 40 Hz, respectively, with a pulse duration of 135 ns and output of 200 mJ/pulse. The "saline flush" and "pulse and retreat" lasing techniques were used. In each case, adjunct balloon angioplasty was performed; in five lesions, an intracoronary stent was implanted. Angiographic evaluation was performed by visual assessment.

RESULTS

Each procedure was successful as defined by laser recanalization of the target lesion (reduction of target lesion stenosis in more than 20%) and subsequent adequate final luminal patency (reduction of target lesion stenosis to less than 50%) and absence of any major in-cardiac catheterization complication (such as perforation, acute closure, dissection, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery), or in-hospital complications (such as death, myocardial infarction, cardiac enzyme elevation, major bleeding), or need for surgical revascularization. A 92 +/- 5% preprocedural percent diameter stenosis was reduced by laser to 35 +/- 16% and by adjunct balloon angioplasty in all lesions and stenting in five lesions, to final residual stenosis of 2 +/- 6%. Angiographic follow-up between 2 and 6 months after the procedure demonstrated a target lesion restenosis rate of 22%.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous excimer laser is safe and efficacious in the treatment of focal obstructive lesions caused by allograft coronary artery disease. These data represent an early clinical experience; thus, the long-term outcome of this revascularization method in recipients of heart transplantation will have to be determined by a large scale prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study.

Acute thrombotic-ischemic coronary syndromes: the usefulness of TEC

Transluminal extraction catheter (TEC) is a percutaneous device that performs simultaneous thrombus aspiration and plaque excision. Clinical indications for its application are acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and stable angina caused by atherosclerotic, thrombotic lesions located within native coronary arteries and degenerated saphenous vein grafts. The device is useful in management of ischemic patients with contraindications to either pharmacologic thrombolytics or platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, and can also effectively be used in combination with these agents. A successful TEC procedure requires careful patient selection, strict adherence to recommended indications, optimal equipment selection, familiarity with mechanical components of the device, full understanding of safe and efficacious techniques for deployment and activation, as well as recognition of unique associated angiographic manifestations such as the "empty-pouch phenomenon." As with other debulking devices, the incidence of restenosis post-TEC appears to be directly related to acute luminal gain at the time of procedure and therefore requires the need for adjunct stenting. This communication describes and illustrates various clinical, technical, and angiographic aspects of TEC procedure in patients with acute ischemic-thrombotic coronary syndromes. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:406-420, 1999.

Recurrent stenosis of common carotid-intracranial internal carotid interposition saphenous vein bypass graft caused by intimal hyperplasia and treated with endovascular stent placement. Case report and review of the literature

Intimal hyperplasia is a well-known cause of delayed stenosis in vein bypass grafts in all types of vascular surgery. Options for treatment of stenosis in peripheral and coronary artery bypass grafts include revision surgery and the application of endovascular techniques such as balloon angioplasty and stent placement. The authors present a case of stenosis caused by intimal hyperplasia in a high-flow common carotid artery-intracranial internal carotid artery (IICA) saphenous vein interposition bypass graft that had been constructed to treat a traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the intracavernous ICA. The stenosis recurred after revision surgery and was successfully treated by endovascular stent placement in the vein graft. The literature on stent placement for vein graft stenoses is reviewed, and the authors add a report of its application to external carotid-internal carotid bypass grafts. Further study is required to define the role of endovascular techniques in the management of stenotic cerebrovascular disease.

Economic impact on physicians and hospitals of proposed changes in Medicare reimbursement for coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

The federal government is implementing changes in reimbursement for angioplasty and coronary stenting. These include reductions in physician reimbursement and a redesignation of intracoronary stents to a different diagnosis-related group than other methods of intracoronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the financial impact on physicians and hospitals of proposed federal reimbursement policies for percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.

METHODS

We modeled the financial effects of 3 different stenting strategies: strategy I is the most conservative, with stents reserved for addressing lab complications; strategy II stents are used for suboptimal results after attempts at conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA); strategy III is the most aggressive, with initial stenting of all accessible lesions. We used economic data on PTCA and stent costs from a 1996 dataset and made assumptions about PTCA and stent success rates and restenosis rates based on published data.

RESULTS

Under current reimbursement policies, physician revenues and profits are approximately equal under all 3 stenting strategies. After the proposed changes, there is a slight financial incentive for physicians to pursue the more aggressive strategy III, but the major financial effect is a substantial overall decline in revenues with any of the 3 strategies. For hospitals, the present situation strongly favors the more conservative strategies, but after the proposed changes the more aggressive stenting strategies will be more profitable, thus realigning physician and hospital incentives. Health care delivery organizations that combine physician and hospital income streams achieve the greatest financial stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Current reimbursement policies for angioplasty and stenting have created misaligned incentives between physicians and hospitals. Proposed changes do not present physicians with large economic incentives to pursue aggressive versus conservative stent strategies but substantially address the current disparity in hospital financial incentives.

Percutaneous revascularization modalities in heart transplant recipients

Accelerated allograft vasculopathy significantly limits the survival of heart transplant recipients. The prevalence of allograft coronary artery disease is as high as 18% by 1 year and 50% by 5 years following heart transplant. Heart failure and sudden cardiac death are the two most common clinical presentations. In heart transplant recipients with severe, discrete focal allograft vascular disease, percutaneous balloon angioplasty is a viable palliative option. However, its application is limited by a significant restenosis rate and progression of allograft disease in nontreated segments. Diffuse disease with tapering of vessels may be approached by debulking devices. Emerging revascularization modalities for focal stenoses and some of the diffuse tapering vessels include coronary stents, rotational atherectomy, various wavelength lasers, and, to a lesser extent, directional atherectomy. Conceivably, stents will reduce restenosis rates related to focal, discrete plaques; yet it is unknown whether they will be efficacious in short- and long-term treatment of diffusely diseased segments affected by allograft disease. Accurate assessment of clinical outcomes and long-term evaluation is imperative prior to acceptance of these devices as fundamental interventional tools for treatment of allograft coronary artery disease.

Directional coronary atherectomy for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis

Management of in-stent restenosis has become a significant challenge in interventional cardiology. The results of balloon angioplasty have been disappointing due to the high recurrence of restenosis at follow-up. Debulking of the restenotic tissue within the stents using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) may offer a therapeutic advantage. We report the immediate clinical and angiographic outcomes and long-term clinical follow-up results of 45 patients (46 lesions), mean age 63+/-12 years, 73% men, with a mean reference diameter of 2.9+/-0.6 mm, treated with DCA for symptomatic Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis. DCA was performed successfully in all 46 lesions and resulted in a postprocedural minimal luminal diameter of 2.7+/-0.7 mm and a residual diameter stenosis of 17+/-10%. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgeries. Four patients (9%) suffered a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Target lesion revascularization was 28.3% at a mean follow-up of 10+/-4.6 months. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and repeat target lesion revascularization) was 71.2% and 64.7% at 6 and 12 months after DCA, respectively. Thus, DCA is safe and efficacious for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis. It results in a large postprocedural minimal luminal diameter and a low rate of both target lesion revascularization and combined major clinical events at follow-up.

Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND

Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear.

METHODS

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate.

RESULTS

Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046.

CONCLUSIONS

Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with high speed rotational atherectomy and IVUS guidance in small <3.0 mm vessels

The management of in-stent restenosis remains a subject for debate because no one revascularization option is considered the most appropriate. Since a high restenosis rate still occurs after repeat balloon angioplasty, new techniques are attempted in order to reduce this rate. A combination of high speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty is likely to achieve good results. In small (<3.0 mm diameter) vessels, the risk of interaction between the burr and the stent increases. We thus used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with HSRA in small <3.0 mm small diameter vessels. Nine patients with in-stent restenosis in small vessels were referred for repeat angioplasty. Initial IVUS examination was used to assess the minimal stent struts diameter and to guide the burr size selection. A combination of HSRA and additional balloon angioplasty was performed under IVUS and angiographic guidance. Mean angiographic reference diameter was 2.25 +/- 0.35 mm and mean stent struts diameter was 2.38 +/- 0.20 mm. Burr size was selected approximately 0.5 mm smaller than stent struts diameter and ranged from 1.75 to 2.5 mm, with a 0.88 +/- 0.12 mean burr/artery ratio (range 0.71, 1.08). In two patients, a second larger burr was used. In 4/9 patients, the burr size chosen under IVUS guidance was close to angiographic MLD at stent implantation and thus larger than what would be used without IVUS guidance. Additional balloon angioplasty was decided in all cases, using a 1.1 +/- 0.15 balloon/artery ratio. No complication occurred. Mean relative gain in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 94 +/- 90% after HSRA and 54 +/- 34% after balloon angioplasty (total relative gain 180 +/- 100%). IVUS guidance allowed safe management of in-stent restenosis in small vessels using combination of HSRA and balloon angioplasty. Long-term follow-up and comparison with other techniques are necessary to assess whether this technique should be used routinely.

Histopathology of in-stent restenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies have suggested that smooth muscle cell (SMC) hyperplasia is the most likely cause of in-stent restenosis. However, pathological data regarding this issue are limited. Specifically, direct evidence of proliferative activity in tissues excised from stenotic stents has not been previously reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tissue specimens were retrieved by directional atherectomy from 10 patients in whom in-stent restenosis complicated percutaneous revascularization of peripheral artery disease. Analysis of cellular composition was performed quantitatively after cell-specific immunostaining. For specimens preserved in methanol (7 of 10), cellular proliferation was evaluated by use of antibodies to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cyclin E, and cdk2. TUNEL staining for apoptosis was performed on 8 paraformaldehyde-preserved specimens. Each of the 10 specimens contained extensive foci of hypercellularity composed predominantly of SMCs (mean+/-SEM, 59.3+/-3.0%). Evidence of ongoing proliferative activity was documented in all 7 methanol-preserved specimens: 24.6+/-2.3% of SMCs were PCNA-positive, 24.8+/-3.1% were cyclin E-positive, and 22.5+/-2.2% were cdk2-positive. Apoptotic cells were detected in all 8 specimens that had been appropriately preserved to permit DNA nick-end labeling. Macrophages and leukocytes were identified in each of the 10 specimens but accounted for a proportionately smaller number of cells (14.5+/-1.9% and 9.5+/-1.4%, respectively). Organized thrombus was observed in 6 of the 10 specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the notion that in-stent restenosis results from SMC hyperplasia and suggest that adjunctive therapies designed to inhibit SMC proliferation may further enhance the utility of endovascular stents.