Discrimination between multicentric and multifocal breast carcinoma by cytogenetic investigation of macroscopically distinct ipsilateral lesions

Evolution of synchronous female bilateral breast cancers and response to treatment

Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (sBBC) occurs after both breasts have been affected by the same germline genetics and environmental exposures. Little evidence exists regarding immune infiltration and response to treatment in sBBCs. Here we show that the impact of the subtype of breast cancer on levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs, n = 277) and on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (n = 140) differed according to the concordant or discordant subtype of breast cancer of the contralateral tumor: luminal breast tumors with a discordant contralateral tumor had higher TIL levels and higher pCR rates than those with a concordant contralateral tumor. Tumor sequencing revealed that left and right tumors (n = 20) were independent regarding somatic mutations, copy number alterations and clonal phylogeny, whereas primary tumor and residual disease were closely related both from the somatic mutation and from the transcriptomic point of view. Our study indicates that tumor-intrinsic characteristics may have a role in the association of tumor immunity and pCR and demonstrates that the characteristics of the contralateral tumor are also associated with immune infiltration and response to treatment.

Revisiting multifocal breast cancer: a clonality study of ductal carcinoma using whole exome sequencing

Multifocal breast cancer (MFBC), ductal type, has been hypothesized to arise by one of two mechanisms: either through intramammary/intralymphatic spread from a single index tumor (MBC-1), or as multiple independent tumors with each focus carrying its corresponding ductal carcinoma in-situ (MBC-2). In order to improve our understanding of MFBC pathogenesis, we employed laser capture microdissection coupled with whole-exome sequencing to study clonal origin in MFBC. We selected three cases of MBC-1 (C1 to C3) and MBC-2 (C4 to C6) and analyzed three foci from each case. MBC-1 cases were histologically similar and showed a strong predilection for satellite foci, vascular invasion and nodal metastasis when compared to MBC-2. Our bioinformatics approach provided strong evidence for clonal relationships in MBC-1, as demonstrated by distinct clusters of genes conserved across all tumor foci. Conversely, no gene clusters were shared across all the foci in MBC-2, suggesting multiple independent tumors. These findings provide further support for the two distinct pathogenetic mechanisms in MFBC.

Can Tumor Biology Predict Occult Multifocal Disease in Breast Cancer Patients?

The SHAVE trial is a prospective trial in which 235 women with stage 0 to 3 disease undergoing partial mastectomy were randomized intraoperatively to either have cavity shave's (CSMs) taken at the time of initial surgery or not. In this study, 9 of the 76 patients (11.8%) with initially negative margins randomized to the “shave” group had occult cancers found in the CSM. Seven of these patients had sufficient primary tumor tissue available for further analysis. These patients were age and stage matched in a 1:2 ratio to other patients in the trial who had no further disease found in their CSM. A tissue microarray was created, stained for E-cadherin, MUC1, and beta-catenin, and evaluated by two independent pathologists (blinded to outcome). There were no significant differences between cases and controls in terms of median invasive tumor size, ductal carcinoma in situ size, volume of initial resection, and volume of CSM. Further, no differences were noted between cases and controls for median (staining intensity x per cent of cells staining) for each marker. Hence, although nearly 12 per cent of breast cancer patients with negative margins will have occult disease, this could not be predicted by primary tumor markers in this study.

Assessment of Tumor Heterogeneity, as Evidenced by Gene Expression Profiles, Pathway Activation, and Gene Copy Number, in Patients with Multifocal Invasive Lobular Breast Tumors

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises approximately ~10-20% of breast cancers. In general, multifocal/multicentric (MF/MC) breast cancer has been associated with an increased rate of regional lymph node metastases. Tumor heterogeneity between foci represents a largely unstudied source of genomic variation in those rare patients with MF/MC ILC.

METHODS

We characterized gene expression and copy number in 2 or more foci from 11 patients with MF/MC ILC (all ER+, HER2-) and adjacent normal tissue. RNA and DNA were extracted from 3x1.5 mm cores from all foci. Gene expression (730 genes) and copy number (80 genes) were measured using Nanostring PanCancer and Cancer CNV panels. Linear mixed models were employed to compare expression in tumor versus normal samples from the same patient, and to assess heterogeneity (variability) in expression among multiple ILC within an individual.

RESULTS

35 and 34 genes were upregulated (FC>2) and down-regulated (FC<0.5) respectively in ILC tumor relative to adjacent normal tissue, q<0.05. 9/34 down-regulated genes (FIGF, RELN, PROM1, SFRP1, MMP7, NTRK2, LAMB3, SPRY2, KIT) had changes larger than CDH1, a hallmark of ILC. Copy number changes in these patients were relatively few but consistent across foci within each patient. Amplification of three genes (CCND1, FADD, ORAOV1) at 11q13.3 was present in 2/11 patients in both foci. We observed significant evidence of within-patient between-foci variability (heterogeneity) in gene expression for 466 genes (p<0.05 with FDR 8%), including CDH1, FIGF, RELN, SFRP1, MMP7, NTRK2, LAMB3, SPRY2 and KIT.

CONCLUSIONS

There was substantial variation in gene expression between ILC foci within patients, including known markers of ILC, suggesting an additional level of complexity that should be addressed.

Utility of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2/neu analysis of multiple foci in multifocal ipsilateral invasive breast carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2/neu (HER2) testing multiple foci of ipsilateral invasive breast carcinoma at our institution and to evaluate resulting change in treatment recommendation.

METHODS

We identified 165 consecutive cases of multifocal invasive breast cancer over a 10-year period (2005-2014). Clinicopathologic features and treatment recommendation were assessed by slide and chart review.

RESULTS

Seventy (42.4%) of 165 patients had two or more foci tested. In the first 6 years (2005-2010), frequency of testing two or more foci was 31.6% and increased to 70.6% in 2014. Seven (10%) of 70 had a clinically significant difference in ER/PR and/or HER2 status, five (7.1%) with a difference in HER2, one (1.4%) in ER/PR, and one (1.4%) in both ER/PR and HER2. All cases with difference in status had different histology and/or the largest focus was the most positive one.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support current recommendations to evaluate additional smaller tumor foci in multifocal invasive breast cancer if the focus is of different grade or histology. Additional features, including specific histology, grade, and ER, PR, and HER2 status of the largest focus, should also be considered when selecting cases for which testing of additional foci may be of benefit.

Evolving paradigms in multifocal breast cancer

The 7th edition of the TNM defines multifocal breast cancer as multiple simultaneous ipsilateral and synchronous breast cancer lesions, provided they are macroscopically distinct and measurable using current traditional pathological and clinical tools. According to the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the characterization of only the largest lesion is considered sufficient, unless the grade and/or histology are different between the lesions. Here, we review three potentially clinically relevant aspects of multifocal breast cancers: first, the importance of a different intrinsic breast cancer subtype of the various lesions; second, the emerging awareness of inter-lesion heterogeneity; and last but not least, the potential introduction of bias in clinical trials due to the unrecognized biological diversity of these cancers. Although the current strategy to assess the lesion with the largest diameter has clearly its advantages in terms of costs and feasibility, this recommendation may not be sustainable in time and might need to be adapted to be compliant with new evolving paradigms in breast cancer.

HER2 testing of multifocal invasive breast carcinoma: how many blocks are enough?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic yield of testing multiple blocks for HER2 in cases of multifocal breast carcinoma.

METHODS

We identified 246 consecutive cases of multifocal invasive breast carcinoma in which HER2 was tested on more than 1 tumor focus. We performed an audit of all cases with respect to tumor size, grade, and histologic type.

RESULTS

HER2 status was concordant between multiple foci in 230 (93.5%) of 246 cases, with the largest focus having the most positive HER2 result in 242 (98.4%) of 246 cases. We did not find a single case in which a smaller focus demonstrated a more positive HER2 status unless this focus was either higher grade or different histologically.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the evaluation of HER2 on the largest focus, with additional testing on smaller foci having a different histologic type or higher grade.

Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens

CONTEXT

Prostate cancer (PC) with lymph node metastases (LN(+)) is relatively rare, whereas it is relatively common in disease with a Gleason score (GS) 8 to 10 and virtually never seen in PC with GS 6 or less. It is most variable in GS 7 PC.

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinicopathologic features associated with GS 7 PC with LN(+) compared with a control group without lymph node metastases (LN(-)).

DESIGN

We analyzed 184 GS 7 radical prostatectomies with LN(+) and the same number of LN(-) Gleason-matched controls. The LN(+) cases were GS 3 + 4 = 7 (n = 64; 34.8%), GS 4 + 3 = 7 (n = 66; 35.9%), GS 3 + 4 = 7 with tertiary 5 (n = 10; 5.4%), and GS 4 + 3 = 7 with tertiary 5 (n = 44; 23.9%).

RESULTS

The LN(+) cases demonstrated higher average values in preoperative prostate-specific antigen (12.2 versus 8.1 ng/mL), percentage of positive biopsy cores (59.1% versus 42.9%), prostate weight (54.4 versus 49.4 g), number of LNs submitted (12.7 versus 9.4), incidence of nonfocal extraprostatic extension (82.6% versus 63.6%), tumor volume (28.9% versus 14.8%), frequency of lymphovascular invasion (78.3% versus 38.6%), intraductal spread of carcinoma (42.4% versus 20.7%), incidence of satellite tumor foci (16.4% versus 4.3%), incidence of pT3b disease (49.5% versus 14.7%), and lymphovascular invasion in the seminal vesicles (52% versus 30%). There were differences in GS 4 patterns and cytology between LN(+) and LN(-) cases, with the former having higher volumes of cribriform and poorly formed patterns, larger nuclei and nucleoli, and more-frequent macronucleoli. All P ≤ .05.

CONCLUSION

Gleason score 7 PC with LN(+) has features highlighting a more-aggressive phenotype. These features can be assessed as prognostic markers in GS 7 disease on biopsy (eg, GS 4 pattern, intraductal spread, cytology) or at radical prostatectomies (all variables), even in men without LN dissection or LN(-) disease.

Clinical and pathologic features of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer in chinese women: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

This study aims to analyze the clinical-pathological characteristics of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer (MMBC) in Chinese women.

Methods

Sixty-seven cases with MMBC were randomly collected and reviewed at seven hospitals in representative districts of China during 1999 to 2008.

Results

The incidence of MMBC in breast cancer in China was 1.75%. Compared to those with unifocal breast cancer, women with MMBC were more likely to have larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis (59.70% vs. 45.62%) and stage III to IV (46.26% vs. 21.10%). The peak age at onset of MMBC was 40 to 49 years old and has been gradually increasing during 1999 to 2008. Most of the MMBC women were treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

In China, the incidence of MMBC in breast cancer is significantly lower than that in Western countries. Compared to unifocal breast cancer, MMBC is biologically more aggressive. Most MMBC women underwent mastectomy, instead of breast conservation surgery.

Cytogenetic analysis of tumor clonality

All or almost all neoplasias subjected to systematic cytogenetic scrutiny have been found to harbor acquired chromosomal aberrations. The paradigm stemming from the study of hematopoietic malignancies and sarcomas is that cancers are of monoclonal origin (i.e., they have developed from a single transformed somatic progenitor) because all the neoplastic parenchyma cells share at least one primary chromosomal abnormality, with subsequent clonal evolution along the lines of Darwinian selection occurring among the various subclones carrying secondary aberrations. When carcinomas began to be studied more extensively by cytogenetic methods, however, sometimes many cytogenetically unrelated clones were found, in seeming contradiction to the monoclonal hypothesis. Also studies of multiple samples from the same patient led to a rethinking of what the cytogenetic evidence really revealed about tumor clonality, both in its early stages and during disease development. The observed cytogenetic heterogeneity in, for example, tumors of the breast and pancreas vastly surpasses that of leukemias, lymphomas, connective tissue tumors, or even most epithelial, including uroepithelial, tumors. Theoretical reasoning as well as the available experimental data we here review show that the clonal evolution of neoplastic cell populations follows either of four principal pathways: (1) initial monoclonality is retained throughout the entire course of the disease with no additional, secondary aberrations accrued as judged by karyotypic appearance; (2) tumorigenesis is monoclonal but additional aberrations develop with time leading to secondary clonal heterogeneity (clonal divergence); (3) polyclonal tumorigenesis exists from the beginning but is followed by an overall reduction in genomic complexity with time (clonal convergence) due to selection among cytogenetically unrelated clones during tumor progression, resulting in secondary oligo- or monoclonality; or (4) polyclonal tumorigenesis with early clonal convergence is followed by later clonal divergence due to the acquisition of additional cytogenetic changes by the clone(s) that survived during the middle phases of tumor progression. Further studies of individual tumor cells are necessary to elicit precise information about the cell-to-cell variability that exists in many, especially epithelial, neoplasms and which holds the key to a more profound understanding of the complex issue of tumor clonality during all stages of cancer development.

The hormone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and molecular subtype status of individual tumor foci in multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma of breast

Multifocal/multicentric breast cancers are common. However, investigations of biomarkers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in individual tumor foci of such cancers are rare. This study was designed to evaluate the status of the hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and its molecular subtypes in individual foci of multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and to identify the factors associated with the different phenotypes of individual foci. We performed immunohistochemical analyses of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, cytokeratin 5/6, epidermal growth factor receptor, and p53 and fluorescence in situ hybridization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in individual foci of 65 cases of multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma and the associated ductal carcinoma in situ components using tissue microarrays. The estrogen receptor status differed in 2 (3%) of the 65 invasive ductal carcinomas, progesterone receptor status in 7 (11%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in 4 (6%), and molecular subtypes in 5 (8%). The presence of different molecular subtypes in the invasive tumor foci was associated with differences in histologic features (P = .005), high histologic and nuclear grade (P = .012 and P = .021, respectively), p53 overexpression (P = .006), and mixed molecular subtypes in the ductal carcinoma in situ components (P = .011). Multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinomas usually have a single phenotype in terms of hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and molecular subtypes; and thus, immunohistochemical analyses of the index tumor may be sufficient in routine practice. However, if multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinomas are of high grade, of different histologic features, or of heterogeneous ductal carcinoma in situ component, biomarkers of the various foci need to be evaluated separately.

Tumor size and survival in multicentric and multifocal breast cancer

PURPOSE

Current AJCC/UICC staging of early breast cancer defines tumor stage using the largest focus, adding the suffix "(m)" to indicate multiplicity. This method may underestimate the total tumor burden in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer (MMBC). This study examines other measures of tumor size in MMBC to determine which provides the best fit in a multivariate model for survival outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study used data from the Australian Capital Territory and New South Wales Breast Cancer Treatment Group database to identify 812 women with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer; 141 of these women had MMBC. The pathology slides of all women with MMBC were reviewed and all foci of invasive breast cancer were re-measured. The measures of interest were the diameter of the largest deposit, the aggregate diameter and the aggregate volume. These measures of tumor size were included with other clinicopathological features of MMBC in a multivariate analysis to assess their relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Tumor size was associated with PFS and OS in MMBC using any of the three measures; however, the diameter of the largest deposit provided the best fit in the multivariate model for OS.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size is an important prognostic factor for MMBC, and the diameter of the largest deposit provides a better fit in a multivariate model for OS than aggregate diameter and aggregate volume. Therefore, tumor size in MMBC should continue to be measured using the diameter of the largest deposit.

Synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancers: implications for patient management

Interest in the presence and management of synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer has been reported since the early 1920s. The demonstration of multiple foci of breast cancer has been reported in 9-75% of breast cancer related specimens. The large difference in reported incidence is multifactorial and related to the definitions applied, mode of detection and pathological assessment. However, randomised clinical trials comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation over many years have shown no difference in distant disease-free survival or overall survival in patients with synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer compared with unifocal breast cancer. This review examines the current definitions, incidence, pathological assessment, staging and surgical options of synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer.

Tiling array-CGH for the assessment of genomic similarities among synchronous unilateral and bilateral invasive breast cancer tumor pairs

Background

Today, no objective criteria exist to differentiate between individual primary tumors and intra- or intermammary dissemination respectively, in patients diagnosed with two or more synchronous breast cancers. To elucidate whether these tumors most likely arise through clonal expansion, or whether they represent individual primary tumors is of tumor biological interest and may have clinical implications. In this respect, high resolution genomic profiling may provide a more reliable approach than conventional histopathological and tumor biological factors.

Methods

32 K tiling microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was used to explore the genomic similarities among synchronous unilateral and bilateral invasive breast cancer tumor pairs, and was compared with histopathological and tumor biological parameters.

Results

Based on global copy number profiles and unsupervised hierarchical clustering, five of ten (p = 1.9 × 10^-5) unilateral tumor pairs displayed similar genomic profiles within the pair, while only one of eight bilateral tumor pairs (p = 0.29) displayed pair-wise genomic similarities. DNA index, histological type and presence of vessel invasion correlated with the genomic analyses.

Conclusion

Synchronous unilateral tumor pairs are often genomically similar, while synchronous bilateral tumors most often represent individual primary tumors. However, two independent unilateral primary tumors can develop synchronously and contralateral tumor spread can occur. The presence of an intraductal component is not informative when establishing the independence of two tumors, while vessel invasion, the presence of which was found in clustering tumor pairs but not in tumor pairs that did not cluster together, supports the clustering outcome. Our data suggest that genomically similar unilateral tumor pairs may represent a more aggressive disease that requires the addition of more severe treatment modalities, and underscores the importance of evaluating the clonality of multiple tumors for optimal patient management. In summary, our findings demonstrate the importance of evaluating the properties of both tumors in order to determine the most optimal patient management.

Genomic alterations in sporadic synchronous primary breast cancer using array and metaphase comparative genomic hybridization

Synchronous primary breast cancer describes the occurrence of multiple tumors affecting one or both breasts at initial diagnosis. This provides a unique opportunity to identify tissue-specific genomic markers that characterize each tumor while controlling for the individual genetic background of a patient. The aim of this study was to examine the genomic alterations and degree of similarity between synchronous cancers. Using metaphase comparative genomic hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), the genomic alterations of 23 synchronous breast cancers from 10 patients were examined at both chromosomal and gene levels. Synchronous breast cancers, when compared to their matched counterparts, were found to have a common core set of genetic alterations, with additional unique changes present in each. They also frequently exhibited features distinct from the more usual solitary primary breast cancers. The most frequent genomic alterations included chromosomal gains of 1q, 3p, 4q, and 8q, and losses of 11q, 12q, 16q, and 17p. aCGH identified copy number amplification in regions that are present in all 23 tumor samples, including 1p31.3-1p32.3 harboring JAK1. Our findings suggest that synchronous primary breast cancers represent a unique type of breast cancer and, at least in some instances, one tumor may give rise to the other.

Assessment of clonal relationships in ipsilateral and bilateral multiple breast carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridisation and hierarchical clustering analysis

The issue of whether multiple, ipsilateral or bilateral, breast carcinomas represent multiple primary tumours or dissemination of a single carcinomatous process has been difficult to resolve, especially for individual patients. We have addressed the problem by comparative genomic hybridisation analysis of 26 tumours from 12 breast cancer patients with multiple ipsilateral and/or bilateral carcinoma lesions. Genomic imbalances were detected in 25 of the 26 (96%) tumours. Using the genomic imbalances detected in these 26 lesions as well as those previously found by us in an independent series of 35 unifocal breast carcinomas, we compared a probabilistic model for likelihood of independence with unsupervised hierarchical clustering methodologies to determine the clonal relatedness of multiple tumours in breast cancer patients. We conclude that CGH analysis of multiple breast carcinomas followed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the genomic imbalances is more reliable than previous criteria to determine the tumours’ clonal relationship in individual patients, that most ipsilateral breast carcinomas arise through intramammary spreading of a single breast cancer, and that most patients with bilateral breast carcinomas have two different diseases.

Biopathological profile of multiple synchronous homolateral and bilateral breast cancers

It still needs to be verified whether multiple syncronous homolateral and bilateral breast cancers represent intramammary spread of a single tumor or two or more separate neoplastic events. To clarify this problem, we studied the biopathological profile of 46 homolateral and 20 bilateral cases. The cancers were always surgically removed and processed at the same time. The expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), MIB 1, p53, and c-erbB-2 was determined. Computer-assisted image analysis (CAS 200) was used to evaluate ER, PR, MIB 1, and p53. The histological concordance was 95.6% in homolateral and 50% in bilateral cases. The immunophenotype profile of multiple homolateral neoplasms showed a concordance between 93.47% for ER and 78.26% for p53. The results were statistically significant for all parameters except for p53. In bilateral cancers, there was a significant statistical concordance for ER. These data strongly suggest that both mechanisms may exert an influence and, in particular, that in the majority of homolateral carcinomas, there may be intramammary spread of tumor cells. In multiple bilateral tumors, however, the great diversity of the histological aspects and the differences in the immunophenotype pattern suggest that the vast majority of these may constitute independent multiple events.

Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen reduces the risk for contralateral breast cancer by approximately 30%-50%, with benefits probably limited to women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary disease. In a retrospective analysis of data from National Surgical and Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials B-18, B-22, and B-25, we determined whether the ER status of primary breast cancer predicts the ER status of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer and whether tamoxifen treatment affects this relationship. In these trials, tamoxifen at 20 mg/day had been administered only to women aged 50 years or older, rather than to those determined by the ER status of their primary tumor, allowing an assessment of the treatment's effects in ER-negative disease.

METHODS

Among the 5513 eligible patients, 176 patients developed a contralateral breast cancer. The ER status of the primary and contralateral tumor was determined and cross-classified for women who did not receive tamoxifen (i.e., those aged 49 years or younger) and for women who did (i.e., those aged 50 years or older). ER data were available for 110 evaluable invasive contralateral breast cancers.

RESULTS

Among patients who did not receive tamoxifen (n = 62), 89% with an ER-positive primary cancer had an ER-positive contralateral breast cancer and 70% with an ER-negative primary breast cancer had an ER-negative contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio for the association between primary and contralateral ER status = 14.8, 95% confidence interval = 3.8 to 74.3; P<.001). Among patients who received tamoxifen (n = 48), 56% with an ER-positive primary cancer had an ER-positive contralateral breast cancer and 78% with an ER-negative primary cancer had an ER-negative contralateral breast cancer (odds ratio = 3.4, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 39.2; P =.25).

CONCLUSION

The ER status of the primary breast cancer was associated with that of the contralateral breast for patients not receiving tamoxifen. Patients with an ER-positive primary cancer who received tamoxifen had a lower concordance rate with fewer ER-positive contralateral breast cancers, which may be a result of tamoxifen treatment.

Subareolar sentinel node biopsy for multiple breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is deemed suitable only for unifocal breast cancers since multiple foci of cancers may drain to different nodes. We hypothesized that subareolar injection (SI) could identify the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) accurately in patients with multiple cancers (MC) in the breast.

METHODS

We prospectively employed SI of lymphazurin or technetium sulfur colloid, or both, for the identification of SLN in patients with MC in the breast. All patients underwent axillary dissection to compute the accuracy of SLNB.

RESULTS

Forty patients presented with MC in the same breast between January 1996 and July 2002. Fifty-two percent (21 of 40) of patients had involvement of more than 1 quadrant; 18% (7 of 40) had more than 1 histologic type of cancers. SLNs were successfully identified in 100% of patients. Axillary disease was present in 63% (25 of 40) of patients. Sensitivity of SLNB was 100% and false negative rate was 0%. The SLN was the only node involved in 45% (18 of 40) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB using the SI technique may be an alternative to complete axillary dissection in patients with multiple breast cancers.

Reciprocal translocations in breast tumor cell lines: cloning of a t(3;20) that targets the FHIT gene

All molecular alterations that lead to breast cancer are not precisely known. We are evaluating the frequency and consequences of reciprocal translocations in breast cancer. We surveyed 15 mammary cell lines by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH). We identified nine apparently reciprocal translocations. Using mBanding FISH and FISH with selected YAC clones, we identified the breakpoints for four of them, and cloned the t(3;20)(p14;p11) found in the BrCa-MZ-02 cell line. We found that the breakpoint targets the potential tumor-suppressor gene FHIT (fragile histidine triad) in the FRA3B region; it is accompanied by homozygous deletion of exon 5 of the gene and absence of functional FHIT and fusion transcripts, which leads to the loss of FHIT protein expression. Additional experiments using comparative genomic hybridization provided further information on the genomic context in which the t(3;20)(p14;p11) reciprocal translocation was found.

Pathologic analysis of tumor size and lymph node status in multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

For unifocal invasive breast carcinoma, increasing tumor diameter predictably correlates with a greater frequency of lymph node involvement, thereby facilitating treatment decisions. In invasive breast tumors presenting with multiple nodules, however, it is unclear whether tumor size correlates with lymph node dissemination in a similar manner.

METHODS

The authors analyzed a series of 101 invasive breast carcinomas presenting with multiple macroscopically apparent lesions (2 foci: n = 77; 3: n = 20; 4: n = 4). Two different assessments of the tumor size (diameter of largest focus and combined diameter of all the foci) were then correlated with the status of axillary lymph nodes. For comparison with unifocal tumors, the authors used both external and internal control series (the latter consisting of 469 patients from their institution). The associations between lymph node status, tumor size, and multifocality were modeled using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, for each modality of tumor size assessment.

RESULTS

The logistic curves for multifocal and unifocal tumors were significantly different when the largest diameter was used as a tumor size estimate. Multifocal cases had higher frequencies of lymph node involvement than unifocal lesions of similar size category. In a multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio of positive lymph node status in multifocal versus unifocal cases was 2.8 using largest diameter as a tumor size estimate (P < 0.0001). When the combined diameter assessment was used, however, the regression curve of multifocal cases was similar to that of unifocal cases, and the frequency of lymph node positivity was not significantly different in multifocal versus unifocal cases of the same size (odds ratio, 1.4; P = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' results show that, if aggregate diameters are used, unifocal and multifocal breast carcinomas are similar with respect to frequency of regional lymph node metastasis. Currently used algorithms, which use the diameter of the largest nodule, result in understaging of multifocal breast carcinomas due to underestimation of actual tumor size.

Cytogenetic clues to breast carcinogenesis

The somatic mutation theory of cancer maintains that tumorigenesis is driven by genetic alterations, many of which are visible cytogenetically. We have examined breast cancer by chromosome banding analysis after short-term culturing of tumor cells and here review our findings in 322 karyotypically abnormal samples obtained since 1992 from 256 patients. The screening capabilities of this technique enabled us to identify several cytogenetic subgroups of breast cancer, to study the intratumor heterogeneity of breast carcinomas, and to compare primary tumors with their metastases. Using chromosome abnormalities as clonality markers, we could determine on an individual basis when multiple, ipsilateral or bilateral breast, tumors were independent de novo carcinomas and when they resulted from the spreading of a single malignant clone within one breast or from one breast to the other. The distribution of chromosomal breakpoints and genomic gains and losses is clearly nonrandom in breast cancer, something that can guide further investigations using molecular methods. Based on the total dataset, we propose a multipathway model of mammary carcinogenesis that takes into consideration the genetic heterogeneity revealed by the karyotypic findings and review the karyotypic-pathologic correlations and the possible clinical applications of the cytogenetic knowledge.

Are some breast carcinomas polyclonal in origin?

This editorial comments on the important study by Going et al. published in the present issue of the Journal [1]. Using a molecular genetic assay based on the X-chromosome inactivation principle, they found that 4 out of 12 breast carcinomas examined exhibited what the authors call "clonal mosaicism" that is, two or more monoclonal samples were mosaic (polyclonal) in respect of X chromosome inactivation between separate, morphologically homogeneous tumour areas. The authors very carefully discuss potential methodological errors that could have led to this surprising finding, which seems to run counter to the almost unanimously held conviction that carcinomas are monoclonal in origin, but none of these potential errors would explain the results. As often in such situations, the authors prudently state that further studies using independent analytical techniques are necessary to find out whether a significant proportion of mammary carcinomas are indeed polyclonal. However, there already exists a substantial body of evidence from cytogenetic studies of breast cancers indicating that many of them are polyclonal. Although there is still room for interpretation and some doubt remains as to exactly which role should be ascribed to the observed clonal heterogeneity in our models of carcinogenesis, it seems obvious that more attention than before ought to be paid to this now well documented fact.

Genetic heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma of the breast

Genetic heterogeneity in breast cancer has been observed both by cytogenetic and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses; however, the frequency with which genetically heterogeneous clones arise is unknown. In this study, a panel of 115 breast carcinomas was analyzed to determine the extent of clonal divergence in tumor foci at progressive stages of tumor evolution. Intraductal, infiltrating, and metastatic tumor components were microdissected from each tumor and tested for LOH at 20 microsatellite markers on seven chromosomal arms. Of these cases, 24 (21%) demonstrated genetically divergent clones during tumor progression. Clonal divergence, inferred from discordant LOH patterns, was observed most commonly between intraductal and infiltrating tumor (18 cases), but was also demonstrated between infiltrating and metastatic tumor (11 cases). Discordant LOH was observed with markers on one chromosomal arm in 16 cases, on two in 7 cases, and on four in 1 case, and was observed most commonly with markers on 17p, 17q, and 16q. More detailed microdissection of four cases provided evidence for a specific chronology of genetic alterations occurring during the progression of each tumor. The results indicate that the different tumor components observed microscopically in breast cancer specimens often represent genetically divergent clones.

Clonal karyotypic abnormalities in gynecomastia

Gynecomastia is a benign condition that frequently occurs in the male breast gland; however, the cytogenetic data on this entity are very limited. To our knowledge, three cases have been reported in the literature, and the only one with an abnormal karyotype had a concomitant breast carcinoma. In this study we report clonal chromosomal alterations in a gynecomastia sample without any signs of adjacent malignant tissue. The nonrandom abnormalities observed were a deletion of 12p, monosomies of chromosomes 9, 17, 19, and 20, and the presence of a marker chromosome. Most of these alterations have been previously described in the literature in other breast lesions, including benign and malignant (male and female) tumors, indicating their recurrence and nonrandomness in abnormal processes of the mammary gland.

Karyotypic evolution in breast carcinomas with i(1)(q10) and der(1;16)(q10;p10) as the primary chromosome abnormality

The pattern of clonal karyotypic evolution in breast carcinomas carrying an i(1q) or a der(1;16)(q10;p10) as the primary chromosome abnormality was assessed in a series of 42 tumors, including 8 described here for the first time, with either or both (3 tumors) of them defining cytogenetic features. Evidence of clonal evolution was seen in somewhat more than half of all cases in both subgroups. The secondarily acquired aberrations appeared to be nonrandom in distribution. This was especially so for structural rearrangements of 11q leading to loss of material from this arm, which were clearly more common in both subgroups than in karyotypically abnormal breast carcinomas in general. Other deviations from random were less certain but seemed to include the frequent occurrence of +20 in tumors with i(1q) and +7 in tumors with der(1;16)(q10;p10). That differences were observed between i(1q) carcinomas and der(1;16)(q10;p10) carcinomas with regard to their patterns of clonal evolution hints that the pathogenetic effect of the primary change in these two situations may be more than the mere gain of an extra copy of 1q.

Cytogenetic findings in invasive breast carcinomas with prognostically favourable histology: a less complex karyotypic pattern?

Seventeen invasive primary breast carcinomas of histological types usually considered to be prognostically favourable (2 medullary, 3 papillary, 3 tubular, and 9 mucinous carcinomas) were analysed as part of an ongoing study of the cytogenetics of breast cancer. Thirteen of the tumours (7 mucinous, 2 medullary, 2 papillary, and 2 tubular carcinomas) showed clonal chromosome aberrations. Trisomy 7 and i(1q) were present as sole and recurrent aberrations in the mucinous tumours. The 2 tubular carcinomas and I papillary carcinoma had simple numerical changes only, whereas the second papillary tumour had a balanced translocation as the sole anomaly. Both medullary carcinomas had chromosome numbers in the triploid range, with clones displaying structural and numerical changes. Our data, especially when collated with information on previously published cases of mucinous, papillary, tubular, and medullary breast carcinomas, show that the former 3 histological types, in keeping with their recognised prognostic advantage, appear to exhibit relatively simple karyotypic changes, i.e., numerical aberrations, balanced translocations, and near-diploid chromosome numbers. Medullary carcinomas on the other hand, appear to have more complex karyotypes, similar to those described for the more common ductal and lobular subtypes of breast carcinoma.

Cytogenetic polyclonality in tumors of the breast

Cytogenetically unrelated clones are found in half of all carcinomas of the breast and also in the epithelial fraction of many benign breast tumors. The chromosomal aberrations thus detected are clearly nonrandom and appear to be the same as those often seen in other tumors as sole karyotypic anomalies. Clonal chromosome abnormalities are not found in histologically normal breast tissue. Cytogenetically unrelated clones may be found in both primary tumors and secondary lesions, be it within the same breast (multifocal carcinomas), in the contralateral breast (bilateral carcinomas), or in lymph node or other metastases. The aberrations are present in topologically separate tumor domains and may confer on the cells that harbor them different types of cancer-specific behavior, such as the ability to metastasize and invade locally. Whereas the available evidence thus strongly indicates that the cells carrying clonal karyotypic aberrations all are part of the neoplastic parenchyma, it is less certain whether cytogenetic polyclonality actually signifies a multicellular tumor origin, although we think that this is the explanation that best accommodates the cytogenetic data. But even if it should eventually be shown that the seemingly unrelated clones have some submicroscopic tumorigenic mutation in common, the observed karyotypic heterogeneity is remarkable and goes far beyond what one has become accustomed to from most other tumor types. To understand how the various clones interact during mammary carcinogenesis will be a major task in future breast cancer research.