"Painting" the target: how local molecular cues define synaptic relationships

Synapse formation in developing neural circuits

The nervous system consists of hundreds of billions of neurons interconnected into the functional neural networks that underlie behaviors. The capacity of a neuron to innervate and function within a network is mediated via specialized cell junctions known as synapses. Synapses are macromolecular structures that regulate intercellular communication in the nervous system, and are the main gatekeepers of information flow within neural networks. Where and when synapses form determines the connectivity and functionality of neural networks. Therefore, our knowledge of how synapse formation is regulated is critical to our understanding of the nervous system and how it goes awry in neurological disorders. Synapse formation involves pairing of the pre- and postsynaptic partners at a specific neurospatial coordinate. The specificity of synapse formation requires the precise execution of multiple developmental events, including cell fate specification, cell migration, axon guidance, dendritic growth, synaptic target selection, and synaptogenesis (Juttner and Rathjen in Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62:2811, 2005; Salie et al., in Neuron 45:189, 2005; Waites et al., in Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28:251, 2005). Remarkably, during the development of the vertebrate nervous system, these developmental processes occur almost simultaneously in billions of neurons, resulting in the formation of trillions of synapses. How this remarkable specificity is orchestrated during development is one of the outstanding questions in the field of neurobiology, and the focus of discussion of this chapter. We center the discussion of this chapter on the early developmental events that orchestrate the process of synaptogenesis prior to activity-dependent mechanisms. We have therefore limited the discussion of important activity-dependent synaptogenic events, which are discussed in other chapters of this book. Moreover, our discussion is biased toward lessons we have learned from invertebrate systems, in particular from C. elegans and Drosophila. We did so to complement the discussions from other chapters in this book, which focus on the important findings that have recently emerged from the vertebrate literature. The chapter begins with a brief history of the field of synaptic biology. This serves as a backdrop to introduce some of the historically outstanding questions of synaptic development that have eluded us during the past century, and which are the focus of this review. We then discuss some general features of synaptic structure as it relates to its function. In particular, we will highlight evolutionarily conserved traits shared by all synaptic structures, and how these features have helped optimize these ancient cellular junctions for interneural communication. We then discuss the regulatory signals that orchestrate the precise assembly of these conserved macromolecular structures. This discussion will be framed in the context of the neurodevelopmental process. Specifically, much of our discussion will focus on how the seemingly disparate developmental processes are intimately linked at a molecular level, and how this relationship might be crucial in the developmental orchestration of circuit assembly. We hope that the discussion of the multifunctional cues that direct circuit development provides a conceptual framework into understanding how, with a limited set of signaling molecules, precise neural wiring can be coordinated between synaptic partners.

Anchor cell invasion into the vulval epithelium in C. elegans

An understanding of cell-invasive behavior has been limited by the lack of in vivo models where this activity can be clearly visualized and manipulated. We show that a single cell in the Caenorhabditis elegans gonad, the anchor cell (AC), initiates uterine-vulval contact through a cell invasion event. Using genetic analysis, laser ablations, and cell-specific markers, we demonstrate that AC invasion is predominantly stimulated by the 1 degrees vulval lineage cells, which generate a diffusible signal that promotes AC invasive behavior toward these cells and further targets invasive processes between the two central 1 degrees vulval lineage cells. We also show that AC invasion is regulated by the AC response to this cue, as well as a vulval-independent mechanism that weakly drives invasion. These studies dissect the regulatory mechanisms that underlie a simple cell-invasive behavior in vivo, and introduce AC invasion as a model for understanding key checkpoints controlling cell invasion.

Multiple personalities: synaptic target cells as introverts and extroverts

The intricate process of wiring a neuronetwork requires a high degree of accuracy in the communication between pre- and post-synaptic cells. While presynaptic cells have been widely recognized for their dynamic role in synaptic matchmaking, post-synaptic cells have historically been overlooked as passive targets. Recent studies in the Drosophila embryonic neuromuscular system provide compelling evidence that post-synaptic cells participate actively in the synaptogenic process. Endocytosis allows them to quickly modify the array of molecular cues they provide on their surfaces and the extension of dynamic filopodia allows post-synaptic cells to engage in direct long-distance communication. By making use of familiar cellular mechanisms such as endocytosis and filopodia formation, post-synaptic cells may be able to communicate more effectively with potential synaptic partners.

Single-cell analysis of Drosophila larval neuromuscular synapses

The neuromuscular system of Drosophila has been widely used in studies on synaptic development. In the embryo, the cellular components of this model system are well established, with uniquely identified motoneurons displaying specific connectivity with distinct muscles. Such knowledge is essential to analyzing axon guidance and synaptic matching mechanisms with single-cell resolution. In contrast, to date the cellular identities of the larval neuromuscular synapses are hardly established. It is not known whether synaptic connections seen in the embryo persist, nor is it known how individual motor endings may differentiate through the larval stages. In this study, we combine single-cell dye labeling of individual synaptic boutons and counterstaining of the entire nervous system to characterize the synaptic partners and bouton differentiation of the 30 motoneuron axons from four nerve branches (ISN, SNa, SNb, and SNd). We also show the cell body locations of 4 larval motoneurons (RP3, RP5, V, and MN13-Ib) and the types of innervation they develop. Our observations support the following: (1) Only 1 motoneuron axon of a given bouton type innervates a single muscle, while up to 4 motoneuron axons of different bouton types can innervate the same muscle. (2) The type of boutons which each motoneuron axon forms is likely influenced by cell-autonomous factors. The data offer a basis for studying the properties of synaptic differentiation, maintenance, and plasticity with a high cellular resolution.

Surprises from Drosophila: genetic mechanisms of synaptic development and plasticity

Drosophila are excellent models for the study of synaptic development and plasticity, thanks to the availability and applicability of a wide variety of powerful molecular, genetic, and cell-biology techniques. Three decades of study have led to an intimate understanding of the sequence of events leading to a functional and plastic synapse, yet many of the molecular mechanisms underlying these events are still poorly understood. Here, we provide a review of synaptogenesis at the Drosophila glutamatergic neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Next, we discuss the role of two proteins that forward genetic screens in Drosophila have revealed to play crucial-and completely unexpected-roles in NMJ development and plasticity: the origin of replication complex protein Latheo, and the enzyme glutamate decarboxylase. The requirement for these proteins at the NMJ highlights the fact that synaptic development and plasticity involves intense inter- and intracellular signaling about which we know almost nothing.

A paradoxical gradient of a basal lamina-associated repellent is essential for pathfinding by the Ti1 pioneer axons in cockroach embryos

Perturbations of in situ axon growth with proteolytic enzymes and monoclonal antibodies were used to determine the role of gradient guidance cues in the formation of the Ti1 pioneer axon trajectory in cultured cockroach embryos. Treatment with enzymes that degrade the basal lamina indicated that this substrate contains both an elastase-sensitive proximal directing cue and a collagenase-sensitive distal directing cue. The latter is shown to be a repellent of axon growth and is identical to the PROD-2 antigen that is distributed in a gradient along the proximal-distal axis of the leg with high levels in proximal regions. This means that throughout the course of their growth the axons extend in the direction of increasing levels of repellent. At a critical decision point in the trajectory the axons change both the direction of growth and the substrate to which their growth cones adhere. PROD-2 plays an essential role in both of these processes.

Axon pathfinding proceeds normally despite disrupted growth cone decisions at CNS midline

Axons in the bilateral brain of Drosophila decide whether or not to cross the midline before following their specific subsequent pathways. In commissureless mutants, the RP3 and V motoneuron axons often fail to cross the midline but subsequently follow the mirror-image pathways and innervate corresponding muscle targets on the ipsilateral side. Conversely, in roundabout mutants, the RP2 and aCC motoneuron axons sometimes cross the midline abnormally but their subsequent pathways and synaptic targeting are the perfect mirror images of those seen in wild type. Furthermore, within a single segment of these mutants, bilateral pairs of motoneuron axons can make their midline decisions independently of each other. Thus, neither the growth cones' particular molecular experience nor the decision at the midline caused by these mutations affects their ability to respond normally to subsequently presented cues.

Synaptic target recognition at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions

Every synaptogenesis begins with "synaptic target recognition," a cell-cell recognition event in which a neuron and its target stably adhere. Despite its importance in developing nervous systems, synaptic target recognition has been difficult to study in complex systems. The relatively simple and genetically accessible Drosophila NMJ model system provides a repertoire of target recognition cues. We describe how these molecules control the targeting of specific growth cones in either a positive (synaptogenic) or negative (anti-synaptogenic) manner. We also propose two alternate signaling paradigms to explain how these initial cell recognition events are coupled to the intracellular signaling pathways that begin the process of synapse maturation.

The ultrastructural interactions of identified pre- and postsynaptic cells during synaptic target recognition in Drosophila embryos

During the development of neural networks, what sets synaptogenic interactions apart from nonsynaptogenic interactions is not well understood at the subcellular level. Using a combination of intracellular dye injection and electron microscopy, we show that a specific motoneuron (RP3) and its synaptic partners (muscles 6 and 7), both often bearing microprocesses, develop intimate membrane contact sites characterized by junctional structures, prior to their initiating synaptogenesis in Drosophila embryos. Other motoneuron growth cones that extend alongside the RP3 growth cone to innervate surrounding muscles do not form such contacts with muscles 6 and 7. We also examined how specific target recognition molecules affect the development of these ultrastructural associations between synaptic partner cells. When Fasciclin III (Fas3), a "positive" target recognition molecule for RP3, is ectopically expressed in neighboring muscles, the RP3 growth cone ectopically develops membrane contact sites with Fas3-misexpressing muscles with which it would not normally associate. In contrast, when Toll, a "negative" target recognition molecule normally expressed by a subset of muscles that surrounds muscles 6 and 7, is misexpressed on muscles 6 and 7, the RP3 growth cone fails to exhibit its normal close contact with these muscles. We propose that the formation of close membrane associations and junctional structures can be regulated under the influence of synaptic target recognition molecules and signifies the beginning of subcellular events during synaptic target recognition.

A single growth cone is capable of integrating simultaneously presented and functionally distinct molecular cues during target recognition

A variety of cell recognition pathways affect neuronal target recognition. However, whether such pathways can converge at the level of a single growth cone is not well known. The RP3 motoneuron in Drosophila has previously been shown to respond to the muscle cell surface molecules TOLL and fasciclin III (FAS3), which are normally encountered during RP3 pathfinding in a sequential manner. TOLL and FAS3, putative "negative" and "positive" recognition molecules, respectively, affect RP3 antagonistically. Under normal conditions, TOLL and FAS3 together improve the accuracy of its target recognition. Here, we show that, when presented with concurrent TOLL and FAS3 expression, RP3 responds to both, integrating their effects. This was demonstrated most succinctly by single cell visualization methods. When a balance in relative expression levels between the two antagonistic cues is achieved, the RP3 growth cone exhibits a phenotype virtually identical to that seen when neither TOLL nor FAS3 is misexpressed. Thus, growth cones are capable of quantitatively evaluating distinct recognition cues and integrating them to attain a net result, in effect responding to the "balance of power" between positive and negative influences. We suggest that the ability to integrate multiple recognition pathways in real-time is one important way in which an individual growth cone interprets and navigates complex molecular environments.