Successful allogeneic stem-cell transplantation with prophylactic stepwise G-CSF primed-DLIs for relapse after autologous transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: a case report and literature review on the evidence of GVL effects in MCL

Puerarin induced in mantle cell lymphoma apoptosis and its possible mechanisms involving multi-signaling pathway

This research designed to explore the antitumor activity of puerarin against human mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Cell proliferation and apoptosis were assessed by MTS and flow cytometry. Caspase-3, -8, and -9 activities were assessed with the colorimetric caspase protease assay. Apoptotic proteins like PARP, cyclin D1, Bcl-2 family, XIAP, and cIAP I were researched by western blot. The PI3K inhibitor LY294002 was used to investigate the possible mechanism relating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Puerarin in vitro inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis of Z138 cells. Expressions of PI3K and p-Akt were downregulated by puerarin. Puerarin negatively regulated NF-κB activity by inhibiting NF-κB phosphorylation with nuclear translocation inhibition. This kind of effects was correlated with the suppression of expression of cyclin D1, BAX, Bcl-2, XIAP etc. This function was modulated by the PI3K inhibitor. Our results demonstrated that puerarin can induce growth arrest and apoptosis in MCL cells and that the mechanism may involve the NF-κB signaling pathway. Puerarin may have therapeutic applications in the treatment of MCL.

Non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adults with relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a single-center analysis in the rituximab era

Relapsed and refractory (rel/ref) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) portends a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents the only potentially curative therapy in this setting. We analyzed survival outcomes of 29 recipients of non-myeloablative allo-HSCT for rel/ref MCL, and studied possible prognostic factors in this setting. The cumulative incidence of disease progression and non-relapse mortality at 3 years were 28% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13-46%) and 29% (95%CI: 13-47%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at days +100 and +180 were 34% (95%CI: 18-52%) and 45% (95%CI: 26-62%), respectively. With a median follow-up in survivors of 53 (range 24-83) months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 54% (95%CI: 38-76%) and 41% (95%CI: 26-64%), respectively. In vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab (n=6) was associated with inferior 3-year PFS (0% vs. 51%, p=0.007) and OS (17% vs. 64%, p=0.014). Conversely, a second line international prognostic index (sIPI) at transplantation equal to 0 (no risk factors) was associated with an improved 3-year PFS (52% vs. 22%, p=0.020) and OS (71% vs. 22%, p=0.006) compared to sIPI ≥1. Performing an allo-HSCT before 2007 was associated with a decreased 3-year OS (25% vs. 76%, p=0.015) but not with a significantly inferior PFS (17% vs. 59%, p=0.058). In this single center series, we report encouraging results with allo-HSCT for patients with rel/ref MCL. High alemtuzumab doses should probably be avoided in this context.

Lifting the mantle: Unveiling new treatment approaches in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

The management of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a clinical challenge. A standard second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory MCL does not exist. Management of relapsed/refractory MCL requires an individualized treatment approach, incorporating factors such as: functional status, prior treatments, response to prior therapies, and disease biology. Generally, there are two categories of salvage therapy; the first, non-cross-resistant cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and, the second, pathway-targeted agents. For transplant eligible patients, the optimal therapy usually consists of salvage, remission re-induction phase followed, whenever possible, by a consolidation phase. Bendamustine and/or high dose cytarabine plus rituximab based chemotherapy represent the most common salvage therapy with an overall response rate of 70-80%. Consolidation with a reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents the only potentially curative treatment. Overall survival ranges from 30% to 50% at 5 years with this approach. For transplant ineligible patients, ibrutinib is the most effective treatment with an overall response rate of almost 70% and median response duration of 17.5 months. Lacking an effective consolidation, this approach is not considered curative. In this review we characterize the main therapeutic approaches available in this setting and summarize our preferred clinical treatment approach.

Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Despite therapeutic approach that combines rituximab-containing chemotherapy, followed or not by autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients experience relapses. Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIC-allo-SCT) at time of relapse may represent an attractive strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report a multicenter retrospective analysis. Seventy MCL patients underwent RIC-allo-SCT in 12 centers.

RESULTS

Median age at transplantation was 56 years and median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 44 months. The median number of previous therapies was 2 (range, 1-5) including autologous transplantation in 47 cases. At time of transplantation, 35 patients were in complete remission, 20 were in partial response and 15 in stable disease or progressive disease. The median follow-up for living patients was 24 months. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 50% and 53%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year transplant-related mortality rates were 22% and 32%, respectively. The statistical analysis demonstrated that disease status at transplantation was the only parameter influencing EFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that RIC-allo-SCT may be an effective therapy in MCL patients with a chemo-sensitive disease at time of transplantation, irrespective of the number of lines of prior therapy. Studies are warranted to investigate the best type of RIC regimen.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma--does it deserve a better look?

Mantle cell lymphoma is a subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Mantle cell is generally considered incurable with a median overall survival of about 3 years. It is most common in 50 - 70 year old individuals and for this reason transplantation is not a common therapeutic option. Autologous stem cell transplantation does not appear to improve survival with most patients relapsing after transplant and no disease-free plateau. We present 6 mantle cell patients that had a mean of 3 different types of therapy prior to allogeneic transplantation. Allogeneic transplantation is associated with substantial mortality post-transplant from acute toxicity and GVHD. Despite the extensive amount of pretransplant therapy in our patient population, there was no transplant related mortality. All patients are alive and in remission a median of 4.3 plus years after transplantation. Survival from the date of diagnosis is a median of 6.5 plus years. The results of this series would suggest that in a selected group of patients allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be the treatment of choice for lymphomas not curable by standard therapy or autotransplant.

Stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: if, when and how?

Although the prognosis for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients has improved in recent years, the outlook for those with advanced or recurrent disease remains poor. High-dose chemotherapy and autografting performed early in responding patients appears to be a method to extend progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The use of monoclonal antibody therapy added into the initial therapy and in the peritransplant period may improve on these results. Myeloablative allogeneic transplant appears to be a modality capable of providing curative therapy, but is plagued by a high treatment-related mortality, especially in older patients. Reduced-intensity conditioning allografting have fewer problems associated with the initial phase of transplant and hence may be preferred for those patients for whom an allograft is considered but have comorbid conditions or age issues that preclude a full allograft. Long-term results are lacking and the side effects associated with chronic GVHD may be as significant and debilitating. Trials designed to look at newly diagnosed patients with MCL examining the outcomes after planned autologous and allogeneic transplant as part of the initial management are needed to confirm the role of these various modalities in the overall therapy of this poor-outcome lymphoma.

The graft-versus-lymphoma effect: clinical review and future opportunities

Numerous lines of preclinical and clinical evidence support the existence of a graft-versus-leukemia effect, but less evidence supporting a comparable graft-versus-lymphoma effect exists. We review here current clinical data addressing the graft-versus-lymphoma effect, including comparisons of autologous, syngeneic, and allogeneic transplantation; responses to immunomodulation; and responses to nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation. Despite several limitations of the data, we believe that there is sufficient evidence suggesting a significant graft-versus-lymphoma effect. In addition, we discuss approaches for clinical management of lymphoma patients, opportunities for mechanistic studies afforded by donor leukocyte infusions and nonmyeloablative transplantation, and suggestions for clinical studies to further define the magnitude and applicability of the graft-versus-lymphoma effect.

Graft-versus-lymphoma effects: clinical review, policy proposals, and immunobiology

The indubitable existence of a graft-versus-lymphoma (GVL) effect is difficult to prove directly. This article reviews the difficulties in interpreting the current literature in this field and, with a number of caveats, argues for the existence of a clinically meaningful GVL effect in follicular, mantle cell, small lymphocytic, and Hodgkin lymphomas. The evidence, however, for a potent GVL effect in diffuse large-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma is not convincing. Policies for allografting in lymphoma are proposed on the basis of this evidence. The immunobiology of GVL effects is discussed--in particular, the expression of HLA class I and II and co-stimulatory molecules on lymphomas that influence the generation of alloreactive T cells--together with future directions in immunotherapy that may help to eradicate chemoresistant disease.

Diverse clinical applications using advantages of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

The diverse clinical applications of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells based on use of their advantages are summarized. It is apparent that more stem cells and T-lymphocytes can be harvested by mobilization treatment with cytokines from healthy donors in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) than in bone marrow transplantation. It is also clear that a stronger graft-versus-tumor effect can be induced with allogeneic PBSCT than with bone marrow transplantation. One merit of allogeneic PBSCT is that it allows clinicians to design diverse clinical applications. It would appear that allogeneic PBSCT may be preferable in special clinical settings, such as advanced hematological malignancies, situations requiring a strong graft-versus-tumor effect, nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation, and situations requiring a megadose of stem cells. Cytokine-primed peripheral blood stem cells can also be used for adoptive immunotherapy, such as a nonprimed donor lymphocyte infusion.

Clinical impact of early absolute lymphocyte count after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The role of repopulating lymphocytes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) includes the prevention of serious infections and attacking residual tumour cells in the early post-transplant phase. Therefore, the current study analysed the role of the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on day 21 after SCT in predicting transplant outcomes of 82 patients in terms of the risk of opportunistic infections and recurrence of original disease. The median dose of CD34+, CD3+ and mononuclear cells (MNC) infused was 6.41 x 10(6)/kg, 1.96 x 10(8)/kg and 6.81 x 10(8)/kg respectively. The high ALC group (high ALC on day 21; > or =0.35 x 10(9)/l) was associated with the use of peripheral blood stem cells, matched sibling donors and higher cell doses of MNC, CD3+ and CD4+ cells. The high ALC group also exhibited a better overall survival (56.3% vs. 17.7%) and disease-free survival (50.1% vs. 15.9%) after 3 years and lower incidences of relapse (33.6% vs. 67.1%) and fungal infections (3.0% vs. 19.5%) after 1 year. The incidence of cytomegalovirus antigenaemia was lower in the high ALC group (47.7% vs. 73.7%). Accordingly, identifying the ALC on day 21 would appear to be a useful and simple measurement to predict those patients with a high risk of opportunistic infections and relapse after allogeneic SCT.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

For patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a treatment option when autologous HSCT fails to achieve durable remission or is deemed inappropriate. Allogeneic HSCT can result in long-term survival even in patients with refractory lymphomas. The efficacy of allogeneic HSCT is attributed, at least in part, to an immune-mediated graft-versus-lymphoma (GVL) effect that can also be associated with significant toxicity resulting from graft-versus-host disease. However, clinical evidence of a potent GVL effect is inconsistent. Reduced-intensity conditioning before allogeneic HSCT can facilitate the use of this treatment in older patients and those at high risk. The decrease in toxicity with reduced-intensity regimens may be associated with a loss of antitumor effects. Patients with lymphoma should be selected for allogeneic HSCT on the basis of characteristics that strongly influence transplant outcomes, including histology, chemosensitivity, and donor source.

Cellular immunotherapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The chimeric state after allogeneic stem cell transplantation provides an ideal platform for adoptive immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies using donor-derived cells. The present review aims to summarize recent results of the transfusion of donor-derived cells with regard to the diseases treated, the cells used for treatment, and the origin of these cells.

RECENT FINDINGS

The transfusion of donor lymphocytes has been studied widely, not only in patients with recurrent disease, persistent disease, and mixed chimerism but also in a variety of hematologic malignancies. Donors of lymphocytes and hematopoietic stem cells have been HLA-identical siblings, HLA-matched unrelated donors, and HLA-different haploidentical family members. A variety of cells have been used for adoptive immunotherapy, including plain lymphocytes, selected T cells, T cell lines, and T cell clones. The possible therapies have been expanded by natural killer cells and natural killer T cells as well as antibodies directing the effector cells toward the malignancy.

SUMMARY

Adoptive immunotherapy in chimeras has become not only a routine form of treatment of recurrent hematologic malignancy but also a prophylactic measure in high-risk leukemia and lymphoma.

Adoptive immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following nonmyeloablative conditioning

This study retrospectively analyzed data from 446 patients given hematopoietic cell transplants from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors after conditioning with 2 Gy total body irradiation with or without fludarabine and postgrafting immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine following grafting. Fifty-three of 446 patients received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) with a median CD3 dose of 1 × 107 cells/kg. Their diagnoses included myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 10), acute leukemia (n = 10), chronic leukemia (n = 11), multiple myeloma (n = 9), lymphoma (n = 9), and solid tumors (n = 4). Patients received DLI for persistent disease (n = 8), disease relapse (n = 17), progressive disease (n = 12), low donor chimerism with disease (n = 11), or low chimerism with disease remission (n = 5). Seventeen of the 53 patients (32%) are alive with a median follow-up of 30 months; 5 are in complete remission (CR), 2 are in partial remission (PR), and 10 have stable or progressive disease. Nine of 53 patients (17%) developed grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease. Of 48 patients receiving DLI for treatment of disease, 7 achieved CR and 5 PR, with an overall response rate of 25%. Six of 16 patients who received DLI for chimerism had increases in donor chimerism leading to sustained engraftment, whereas 10 eventually rejected their grafts. In conclusion, DLI is a potential treatment strategy, with acceptable toxicity, for patients with persistent, relapsed, or progressive disease after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Relapse or progression after hematopoietic cell transplantation using nonmyeloablative conditioning: effect of interventions on outcome

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzes the effect of interventions aimed at reinducing remissions in patients with relapse or progression of malignant disease following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using nonmyeloablative conditioning.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 81 instances of relapse or progression occurring among 224 patients given HCT as treatment of their hematologic malignancies. All patients received conditioning with 2 Gy total-body irradiation with or without fludarabine and with postgrafting immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine.

RESULTS

Overall survival of patients after relapse or progression was 36%. Fifteen of the 81 patients were given no interventions. Three of these 15 (20%) patients are alive with disease while 12 died with disease progression. Sixty-six patients (81%) received interventions, including withdrawal of immunosuppression (n=32), donor lymphocyte infusions (n=13), or chemotherapy (n=21). Twenty of the 66 (30%) are alive, 5 in complete remission, 4 in partial remission, 1 with stable and 10 with progressive disease. The overall response rate to intervention was 27%. Forty-six (70%) of the patients given interventions died, mainly due to relapse/progression. Patients not receiving interventions had a 1-year survival estimate of 15% compared to 41% in patients given interventions. Factors associated with survival in patients given intervention were disease response (p=0.002), disease category (p=0.001), and time to relapse from transplantation (p=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall prognosis of patients relapsing or progressing after nonmyeloablative HCT is poor, interventions such as the combined use of immunotherapy and chemotherapy can improve patient survival.

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

A high incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) has limited the use of allogeneic transplantation for poor prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We sought to improve the outcome of allografting by utilizing Filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in combination with either standard ablative or reduced-intensity conditioning. A total of 21 patients with intermediate/high-grade lymphoma and seven patients with low-grade histology were enrolled on protocols using PBSC. All patients were considered high risk for recurrence and/or NRM because of age >50 (n=16), refractory disease (n=17), failed autologous transplant (n=11) and abnormal organ function (n=2). In all, 17 patients received ablative regimens and 11 received modified conditioning including fludarabine, intravenous busulfan and ATG. Tacrolimus and mini-dose methotrexate were used for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Median follow-up was 38 months. Disease-free and overall survival were 57 and 58%. Seven of the 11 patients who relapsed after a previous transplant remain disease free. Four of the 10 patients with recurrent/persistent disease post transplant responded to additional therapy including withdrawal of immunosuppression+/-DLI. These results support a potent graft-versus-lymphoma effect and suggest that patients who relapse after an autologous transplant can be salvaged with an allogeneic transplant.

Immunotherapy of cancer by active vaccination: does allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning provide a new option?

The critical role of antigen-specific T cells in cancer immunotherapy has been amply demonstrated in many model systems. Though success of clinical trials still remains far behind expectation, the continuous improvement in our understanding of the biology of the immune response will provide the basis of optimized cancer vaccines and allow for new modalities of cancer treatment. This review focuses on the current status of active therapeutic vaccination and future prospects. The latter will mainly be concerned with allogeneic bone marrow cell transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning, because it is my belief that this approach could provide a major breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. Concerning active vaccination protocols the following aspects will be addressed: i) the targets of immunotherapeutic approaches; ii) the response elements needed for raising a therapeutically successful immune reaction; iii) ways to achieve an optimal confrontation of the immune system with the tumor and iv) supportive regimen of immunomodulation. Hazards which one is most frequently confronted with in trials to attack tumors with the inherent weapon of immune defense will only be briefly mentioned. Many question remain to be answered in the field of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning to optimize the therapeutic setting for this likely very powerful tool of cancer therapy. Current considerations to improve engraftment and to reduce graft versus host disease while strengthening graft versus tumor reactivity will be briefly reviewed. Finally, I will discuss whether tumor-reactive T cells can be "naturally" maintained during the process of T cell maturation in the allogeneic host. Provided this hypothesis can be substantiated, a T cell vaccine will meet a pool of virgin T cells in the allogeneically reconstituted host, which are tolerant towards the host, but not anergised towards tumor antigens presented by MHC molecules of the host.

Autologous and allogeneic transplantation for aggressive NHL

BACKGROUND

Intermediate- and high-grade NHL are generally chemosensitive diseases with high initial response rates to combination chemotherapy. Dose intensification via autologous and allogeneic transplantation provides viable treatment options in specific clinical settings. Currently, autologous transplantation is the standard of care for relapsed but chemosensitive aggressive B-cell NHL. However, tools such as the International Prognostic Index allow risk-adapted analyses, and show that the magnitude of benefit from autologous transplantation differs in lymphoma subsets.

METHODS

Low-risk patients appear to do well regardless of salvage approaches, whereas high-risk patients have suboptimal outcomes with autologous transplantation. In high-risk patients, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation has been examined as part of initial therapy, with long-term data promising but still evolving.

DISCUSSION

A significant concern with autologous transplantation in aggressive and high-grade NHL is the risk of graft contamination with tumor cells. Several investigators have demonstrated the presence of malignant cells in both BM and PBSC, although the clonagenic potential of such cells is unclear. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation has several potential advantages over autologous transplantation for NHL,including procurement of an uncontaminated stem-cell graft, GvL effects, and the elimination of hematopoietic stem-cell damage and consequent secondary leukemia.

RESULTS

The ideal application of allogeneic transplantation in aggressive and high-grade lymphomas is still unclear; but the lower relapse rates demonstrated in several comparisons of the two approaches make this an exciting area to pursue. Finally, non-myeloablative stem-cell transplantation may broaden the use of allogeneic transplantation by lowering regimen-related mortality while capitalizing on GvL.

Treatment of breast cancer with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim: approaches to improving therapeutic outcome

Chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer, and its benefit is directly related to the percentage of the planned dose that is actually administered. In all current chemotherapeutic regimens, a substantial proportion of patients have reductions and/or delays in dosage due to side effects. In about half such cases, the delays or reductions are related to neutropenia. Overall, approximately 30% of patients have a reduction to less than 85% of the planned dosage. Women aged > or = 50 years are more likely to experience a reduction or delay in dose. Dose-intense regimens (excluding myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy) which increase the dose of chemotherapy or reduce the interval between cycles, or both, are a promising approach now under investigation. The human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor filgrastim reduces the incidence of neutropenia and facilitates adherence to full dose intensity in both standard and dose-intensified regimens. A model based on the first-cycle absolute neutrophil count nadir has been developed and validated to determine which patients should receive filgrastim. A cost benefit associated with the use of filgrastim in patients with breast cancer has been realised. This may lead to a re-evaluation of the current treatment guidelines.

GM-CSF-based mobilization effect in normal healthy donors for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

It is important to optimize methods to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells into peripheral blood (PB) for successful allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Our primary intent was to investigate the role of GM-CSF for mobilization in normal healthy donors and to compare its efficacy in mobilizing stem cells alone, in concurrent combination and in sequential combination with G-CSF in this study. We analyzed the results of the PBSC harvest through large volume leukapheresis from 48 normal healthy donors mobilized by three different regimens including GM-CSF. Donors were assigned sequentially to one of the following regimens for mobilization: GM-CSF 10 microg/kg/day alone (group 1, n = 9); concurrent combination (group 2, n = 20) of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day and GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day; sequential combination (group 3, n = 19) of GM-CSF alone 10 microg/kg/day for 3 days followed by G-CSF alone 10 microg/kg/day for 2-3 days. The harvested CD34(+) cell count (P < 0.05) was statistically higher in group 3 than in group 1 or 2. Pre-collection WBC count in donors (P < 0.05), harvested MNC (P < 0.05) and CD3(+) cell count (P < 0.05) of group 2 or 3 were significantly higher than those of group 1. Recipients who received stem cells mobilized with combination regimens showed an earlier recovery of WBC and platelets count than those with GM-CSF alone. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was not statistically different among three recipient groups. GM-CSF-based mobilization was well tolerated in normal healthy donors. The sequential combination regimen appears to be an excellent mobilization strategy and might be preferred as the optimal method in some clinical situations that need a higher number of stem cells.

Mantle cell lymphoma: a biological and therapeutic paradigm

Recent classifications of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) have strictly individualized mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) on the basis of a combination of morphologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic criteria. This clinicopathological entity now appears to be a biological and therapeutic model for the understanding and treatment of hematologic malignancies. The lymphomogenesis of MCL could be explained by a series of genetic abnormalities which occur at different steps of the disease: (1) mutation and/or loss of the ATM gene in centrocytic cells of the follicle mantle of lymph nodes, leading to the loss of ATM function, particularly involved during the V(D)J recombination process; (2) a t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation which induces a constitutive Bcl-1/PRAD1/CCND1 expression, responsible for cell cycle activation of centrocytic cells characteristic of typical MCL; and (3) secondary additional chromosomal aberrations, such as a p53 mutation, observed in blastic transformation of MCL. Despite the evaluation of a number of treatment modalities, the optimal management of MCL has not yet been defined: (1) conventional and intensified chemotherapy and monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy appear to be effective for the improvement of response rates and event-free or overall survivals; (2) combinations of different treatment modalities must be tested to modify the natural dismal outcome of the disease; and (3) innovative approaches should be developed. From this point of view, all these considerations offer a fine opportunity for extensive medical reflection.

Prophylactic growth factor-primed donor lymphocyte infusion using cells reserved at the time of transplantation after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Standard allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) offers only a small chance of cure for most adult patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. The authors postulated that allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) followed by prophylactic growth factor-primed donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) with cells reserved at harvest would maximize the graft-versus-tumor effects in patients with hematologic malignancies who had a high risk of recurrence.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with hematologic malignancies who had a high risk of recurrence were allocated on an intent-to-treat basis to allogeneic PBSCT from human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donors followed by prophylactic growth factor-primed DLI of cells reserved at harvest for transplantation.

RESULTS

The median age was 37 years (range, 19-56 years). All donors underwent two or more apheresis procedures. The median numbers of mononuclear cells (MNCs), CD34 positive (CD34+) cells, and CD3+ cells, respectively, that were collected for 17 donors were 9.0 x 10(8) MNCs/kg (range, 4.9-14.4 x 10(8) MNCs/kg), 13.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 2.4-75.2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg), and 5.8 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 3.3-9.9 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg) for a mean number of 2.35 apheresis procedures (range, 2.0-4.0 procedures). The median numbers of MNCs and CD3+ cells that were cryopreserved were 2.1 x 10(8) MNCs/kg (range, 0.0-4.4 x 10(8) MNCs/kg) and 1.4 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 0.0-3.5 x 10(8) CD3+ cells/kg). Seven of 17 patients received additional PBSCs, with a median of 5.0 x 10(7) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 3.0-9.9 CD3+ cells/kg) between Day 41 and Day 120. The reasons for inability to administer additional PBSCs in 10 patients included early death (n = 4 patients), severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (n = 3 patients), disease recurrence (n = 2 patients), and harvest failure (n = 1 patient). Of seven patients, two patients died of recurrence, and one died of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis. The surviving four patients were free of disease when last assessed (median follow-up, 597 days) but were suffering from chronic GVHD (one patient had limited GVHD, and three patients had extensive GVHD).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors suggest that allogeneic PBSCT with prophylactic growth factor-primed DLI may be a potentially curative strategy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies in patients with a high risk of recurrence. Their approach may offer the additional advantage of collecting enough cells at harvest for the potential use of DLI, which is easy, convenient for donors, and cost effective.

Stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: should it ever be used outside clinical trials?

The outlook for patients with mantle cell lymphoma is poor. The reported median survival in most published series is only 3 to 4 years, and even the most favorable prognostic groups have median survival rates of only 5 years, with no evidence of cure. The use of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this disease has increased dramatically in recent years. Despite encouraging reports from single centers and registries, the impact of stem cell transplantation on the outcome for mantle cell lymphoma is unclear. Optimal first-line regimens for mantle cell lymphoma have yet to be defined, and it is therefore difficult to place the role of first remission transplantation in an appropriate context. Prospective randomized trials have been difficult to design and conduct in the absence of a well-defined 'standard' treatment. The role of stem cell transplantation as a salvage strategy is also unknown, although available data suggest that it does not improve survival in heavily pre-treated patients. In the absence of clear evidence for a survival advantage for patients receiving stem cell transplants for mantle cell lymphoma, entry into clinical trials should be a priority.

Biology and management of mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma is a distinct subtype and accounts for approximately 5 to 10% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The malignant cells express pan B-cell markers, including CD19, CD20 and CD22, and the T-cell marker CD5, whereas CD10 and CD23 expression are usually absent. By cytogenetic analysis, the t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation is commonly observed, resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1. This entity often combines some unfavorable clinical features of the indolent and aggressive lymphoma subtypes, as it is generally incurable and relatively aggressive. It is most commonly observed in men 50 to 70 years of age and is characterized by disseminated disease, usually involving lymph nodes, bone marrow, and spleen. Frequently, there is extranodal involvement including the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors are incurable with the currently available therapeutic options, with usual time to progression after chemotherapy of approximately 1 year. Newer chemotherapy regimens (including stem cell transplantation) and monoclonal antibody-based therapies have shown limited evidence of additional benefit. Overall, the prognosis for patients with mantle cell lymphoma remains poor, and novel strategies are needed.