Combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the treatment of metastatic osteogenic sarcoma

Docetaxel-induced radiation recall dermatitis with atypical features: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) associated with actinomycin D was first described by in 1959, followed by the reporting of several RRD-inducing drugs. In 1994, a study demonstrated docetaxel-induced RRD for the first time; however, despite some case studies reporting RRD, a little has been reported on it since then. Here we present a rare case of atypical docetaxel-induced RRD.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient in his 60s was administered radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer. He continued receiving hormonal therapy for 2 years because of being in a high-risk group and became nadir. Six months since the completion of hormonal therapy, his prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level increased again. Based on the radiological examination, he was diagnosed with multiple lung, bone, and lymph node metastases. Accordingly, we started docetaxel (75 mg/m) every 5 weeks in consideration of myelosuppression for hormone-resistant multiple metastases. Although lung metastasis shrunk by one cycle docetaxel, radiotherapy for the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae was performed for back pain and lumbago. On day 21, at the end of radiotherapy, the same dose of docetaxel was administrated for the third time. On day 7, after third docetaxel administration, erythema appeared in a irradiated field of the thoracic and lumbar vertebra. Erythema primarily appeared on the anterior side of the body, and no skin reaction was noted on the posterior part of the thoracic irradiated area. Notably, no skin reaction was observed in the previously irradiated field for prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report draws attention to the development of atypical RRD after administration of docetaxel and advises careful follow-up even if RRD does not appear after the first docetaxel administration.

Avoiding Severe Toxicity From Combined BRAF Inhibitor and Radiation Treatment: Consensus Guidelines from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)

BRAF kinase gene V600 point mutations drive approximately 40% to 50% of all melanomas, and BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) have been found to significantly improve survival outcomes. Although radiation therapy (RT) provides effective symptom palliation, there is a lack of toxicity and efficacy data when RT is combined with BRAFi, including vemurafenib and dabrafenib. This literature review provides a detailed analysis of potential increased dermatologic, pulmonary, neurologic, hepatic, esophageal, and bowel toxicity from the combination of BRAFi and RT for melanoma patients described in 27 publications. Despite 7 publications noting potential intracranial neurotoxicity, the rates of radionecrosis and hemorrhage from whole brain RT (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or both do not appear increased with concurrent or sequential administration of BRAFis. Almost all grade 3 dermatitis reactions occurred when RT and BRAFi were administered concurrently. Painful, disfiguring nondermatitis cutaneous reactions have been described from concurrent or sequential RT and BRAFi administration, which improved with topical steroids and time. Visceral toxicity has been reported with RT and BRAFi, with deaths possibly related to bowel perforation and liver hemorrhage. Increased severity of radiation pneumonitis with BRAFi is rare, but more concerning was a potentially related fatal pulmonary hemorrhage. Conversely, encouraging reports have described patients with leptomeningeal spread and unresectable lymphadenopathy rendered disease free from combined RT and BRAFi. Based on our review, the authors recommend holding BRAFi and/or MEK inhibitors ≥3 days before and after fractionated RT and ≥1 day before and after SRS. No fatal reactions have been described with a dose <4 Gy per fraction, and time off systemic treatment should be minimized. Future prospective data will serve to refine these recommendations.

The Current and Future Therapies for Human Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common non-hematologic malignant tumor of bone in adults and children. As sarcomas are more common in adolescents and young adults than most other forms of cancer, there are a significant number of years of life lost secondary to these malignancies. OS is associated with a poor prognosis secondary to a high grade at presentation, resistance to chemotherapy and a propensity to metastasize to the lungs. Current OS management involves both chemotherapy and surgery. The incorporation of cytotoxic chemotherapy into therapeutic regimens escalated cure rates from <20% to current levels of 65-75%. Furthermore, limb-salvage surgery is now offered to the majority of OS patients. Despite advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques over the past three decades, there has been stagnation in patient survival outcome improvement, especially in patients with metastatic OS. Thus, there is a critical need to identify novel and directed therapy for OS. Several Phase I trials for sarcoma therapies currently ongoing or recently completed have shown objective responses in OS. Novel drug delivery mechanisms are currently under phase II and III clinical trials. Furthermore, there is an abundance of preclinical research which holds great promise in the development of future OS-directed therapeutics. Our continuously improving knowledge of the molecular and cell-signaling pathways involved in OS will translate into more effective therapies for OS and ultimately improved patient survival. The present review will provide an overview of current therapies, ongoing clinical trials and therapeutic targets under investigation for OS.

Radiation recall with anticancer agents

There is still much that needs to be understood about radiation recall, and it is not currently possible to predict which patients will be affected and to which drugs they will react. Furthermore, there are no clearly defined characteristics of drugs that cause radiation recall, and thus, it is a possibility that must be kept in mind with use of any drug after radiotherapy, including those from new drug classes. Although it is not yet possible to design treatment regimens to eliminate the risk of radiation recall, it seems likely that risks can be minimized by prolonging the interval between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of full-dose chemotherapy.

Radiation recall is an acute inflammatory reaction confined to previously irradiated areas that can be triggered when chemotherapy agents are administered after radiotherapy. It remains a poorly understood phenomenon, but increased awareness may aid early diagnosis and appropriate management. A diverse range of drugs used in the treatment of cancer has been associated with radiation recall. As most data come from case reports, it is not possible to determine the true incidence, but to date the antineoplastic drugs for which radiation recall reactions have been most commonly reported include the anthracycline doxorubicin, the taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel, and the antimetabolites gemcitabine and capecitabine. Radiation recall is drug-specific for any individual patient; it is not possible to predict which patients will react to which drugs, and rechallenge does not uniformly induce a reaction. There are no identifiable characteristics of drugs that cause radiation recall, and thus, it is a possibility that must be kept in mind with use of any drug after radiotherapy, including those from new drug classes. Although it is not yet possible to design treatment regimens to eliminate the risk of radiation recall, it seems likely that risks can be minimized by prolonging the interval between completion of radiotherapy and initiation of chemotherapy.

Radiation recall dermatitis: case report and review of the literature

"Radiation recall"-also called "radiation recall dermatitis"-has been defined as the "recalling" by skin of previous radiation exposure in response to the administration of certain response-inducing drugs. Although the phenomenon is relatively well known in the medical world, an exact cause has not been documented. Here, we report a rare occurrence of the radiation recall phenomenon in a breast cancer patient after palliative radiotherapy for bone, brain, and orbital metastases.

Long-term outcome after polychemotherapy and intensive local radiation therapy of high-grade osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Current standard therapy for high-grade osteosarcoma is neoadjuvant chemotherapy and complete resection of the primary tumour. Irradiation can improve local control if complete tumour resection is not possible or refused, but data on long-term outcome are not available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report on long-term results for overall survival, occurrence of local recurrence and metastasis, joint function and side-effects in 13 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma having been treated with a combination of local irradiation and polychemotherapy (median follow-up of 13.5 years).

RESULTS

Ten of the 13 patients were alive 4-23 years after diagnosis. Three patients suffered local recurrence, in 2 of them tumour control and long-term survival could be achieved by secondary salvage surgery and polychemotherapy. In 5 patients pathological fractures of the irradiated bones occurred, none of them was associated with local recurrence. In 7 of the 10 long-term survivors good or fair joint function was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that combination of chemotherapy and intensive local irradiation can achieve long-term local control and even cure in high-grade osteosarcoma. Thus radiation therapy may represent an alternative to definite surgery in selected patients, in particular in those with good response to chemotherapy, when surgery is not feasible or refused.

Osteosarcoma: review of the past, impact on the future. The American experience

Major advances have been achieved in the treatment of osteosarcoma with the discovery of several chemotherapeutic agents that were active in the disease. These agents comprise high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, Adriamycin, cisplatin, ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide. The agents were integrated into various regimens and administered in an effort to destroy silent pulmonary micrometastases which are considered to be present in at least 80% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Their efficacy in achieving this goal was realized and their use was further extended to the application of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy to destroy the primary tumor and achieve safe surgical resections. Disease free survival was escalated from <20% prior to the introduction of effective chemotherapy to 55-75% and overall survival to 85%. Further, the opportunity to perform limb salvage was expanded to 80% of patients. Of interest also was an attempt in one series to treat the primary tumor exclusively with chemotherapy, and abrogation of surgery. Adding to these advances, varieties of subsequently discovered agents are currently undergoing investigations in patients who have relapsed and/or failed conventional therapy. The agents include Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, novel antifolate compounds, and a liposome formulation of adriamycin (Doxil). A biological agent, muramyl tripeptide phosphatidyl ethanolamine (MTPPE) was also recently investigated in a 2x2 factorial design to determine its efficacy in combination with chemotherapy (methotrexate, cisplatin, Adriamycin and ifosfamide).In circumstances where the tumor was considered inoperable, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were advocated for local control. High dose methotrexate, Adriamycin and cisplatin and Gemcitabine interact with radiation therapy and potentiate its therapeutic effect. This combination is also particularly useful in palliation. Occasionally, the combination of radiation and chemotherapy may render a tumor suitable for surgical ablation. Samarium153, a radio active agent, is also used as palliative therapy for bone metastases.However, despite the advances achieved with the multidisciplinary application of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical ablation of the primary tumor over the past 3(1/2) decades, the improved cure rate reported initially has not altered. Particularly vexing is the problem of rescuing patients who develop pulmonary metastases after receiving seemingly effective multidisciplinary treatment. Approximately 15-25% of such patients only are rendered free of disease with the reintroduction of chemotherapy and resection of metastases. Extrapulmonary metastases and multifocal osteosarcoma also constitute a major problem. The arsenal of available agents to treat such patients has not made any substantial impact in improving their survival. New chemotherapeutic agents are urgently required to improve treatment and outcome. Additional strategies to be considered are targeted tumor therapy, anti tumor angiogenesis, biotherapy and therapy based upon molecular profiles. This communication outlines sequential discoveries in the chemotherapeutic research of osteosarcoma in the United States of America. It also describes the principles regulating the therapeutic application of the regimens and considers the impact of their results on the conduct in the design of future investigations and treatment.

Patch-test-induced "flare-up" reactions to neomycin at prior biopsy sites

"Recall dermatitis" classically refers to the uncommon phenomenon of chemotherapy-induced reactivation of skin damage originally induced by radiotherapy months or years earlier. We compare this condition to ectopic flare-up reactions presenting as dermatitis at existing or previous sites by an inducing agent. Enhanced sensitization of an existent allergen by patch testing is rarely described. We describe a case of a 61-year-old man's developing localized allergic contact dermatitis at previous neomycin-treated sites following the diagnosis of neomycin sensitivity on patch testing, which we attribute to a "flare-up" phenomenon.

An ambiguous phenomenon of radiation and drugs: recall reactions

The term 'radiation recall' describes an acute inflammatory reaction in previously irradiated areas after the administration of certain inciting systemic agents. It was first described in 1959 by D'Angio that dermatitis is related to the application of actinomycin D on the skin. Though this reaction occurs frequently on the skin, it may also be seen in the oral mucosa, the larynx, esophagus, small intestine, lungs, muscle tissue, and brain. Most drugs associated with recall reactions are cytotoxics, however, several other drugs may also elicit the phenomenon. Although this phenomenon is well known, its etiology is not understood. Radiation recall reactions are generally associated with megavoltage radiotherapy. The time interval between the completion of radiotherapy and the recall reaction ranges from days to years. The recall reaction occurs on average 8 days (3 days to 2 months) after the application of the promoting agent. Although no standard treatment exists, some authors suggest discontinuation of the inciting drug and the use of corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents.

Radiation recall: A well recognized but neglected phenomenon

INTRODUCTION

Radiation recall is an inflammatory skin reaction at a previously irradiated field subsequent to the administration of a variety of pharmacologic agents. Although skin has been the major site of radiation recall toxicity, instances involving other organ have been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for this review were identified by searches of Medline and Cancerlit. The search terms "radiation", "recall", and "toxicity" were used. References identified from within retrieved articles were also used. There was no limitation on year of publication and no abstract forms were included. Only articles published in English were taken into consideration.

RESULTS

Idiosyncratic drug hypersensitivity phenomenon is a recent hypothesis which correlates best with the available facts at this moment. The phenomenon may occur days to years after radiotherapy has been completed. The majority of the drugs commonly used in cancer therapy have been involved in the radiation recall phenomenon. A mixed non-specific inflammatory infiltrate seems to be the common histopathologic criteria in previous published reports. Universally, corticosteroids or the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, in conjunction with withdrawal of the offending agent, produce prompt improvement.

CONCLUSION

We propose to collect all future radiation recall phenomenon in a Rare Cancer Network database in order to augment our understanding of this rare reaction.

Osteosarcoma of the jaw bones

Currently, it has been established that osteosarcoma (OS) of bone is not a stereotyped disease, and several varieties have been identified by clinical findings, radiographic and histopathologic appearances. Generally, it is the most common primary malignant bone neoplasm that accounts for at least 30% of all primary tumours of bone. In the jaw bones, OS accounts for about 4% of all the primary malignant neoplasms. In the general skeleton, the highest incidence is observed in the second decade of life; the neoplasm is said to be unusual before the age of 5 years and very rare after age 50 years. The aetiology and precise pathogenesis of this disease remain unknown. A diagnosis of clinically and radiologically suspicious OS requires meticulous histologic examination. However, histologic diagnosis may also be difficult since the different varieties of OS may have different morphological patterns in different sample sites. Currently, the two therapeutic modalities used in the primary treatment of OS include radical surgery and cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the general skeleton, the use of surgery alone results in a 90% rate of recurrence of OS. Notably, the advent of adjuvant and neoadjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy as an adjunct to radical surgery has greatly improved the prognosis of many cases of OS of the jaw bones.

Characterizing the phenomenon of radiation recall dermatitis

Radiation recall represents the 'recalling' of an effect similar in appearance to that of an acute radiation reaction in a previously irradiated field. The recall is triggered by the administration of certain drugs days to years after the exposure to ionizing radiation. This review focuses almost exclusively on the skin manifestations of radiation recall to assemble the largest data base upon which to discuss this rare phenomenon. No absolute radiation dose threshold is apparent, but rather an interplay between dose and time before drug exposure seems to affect both the risk and speed of onset of recall. Recall usually occurs on first exposure to a particular recall-triggering drug. The skin reaction develops within minutes to days. The time to develop the reaction may be slightly longer for oral than intravenously administered drugs reflecting their bioavailability. Most drugs associated with recall are cytotoxics, but several other drugs may elicit the phenomenon. Individuals exposed to a number of potentially recall-triggering drugs reveal the marked drug specificity characteristic of the phenomenon. Skin reactions usually settle within a few days of stopping the triggering drug. The role of steroids or anti-histamines in affecting resolution is unclear. Drug rechallenge tends to produce either only a mild recurrence or no recurrence of recall. Steroids or dose reduction may favour uneventful rechallenge. A number of aetiological hypotheses on radiation recall exist. Using the available evidence these hypotheses are critically reviewed and a novel hypothesis based on radiation affecting local cutaneous immunological responses proposed.

Improved prognosis of children with osteosarcoma metastatic to the lung(s) at the time of diagnosis

BACKGROUND

A poor outcome is traditionally ascribed to osteosarcoma metastatic to the lungs, but data have been unavailable regarding the outcome of such patients after systematic treatment on clinical trials.

METHODS

The clinical course and outcome of 31 patients who had osteosarcoma metastatic to the lungs diagnosed between 1962 and 1990 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital were reviewed to determine whether the use of increasingly aggressive multimodality therapy has improved their outcome. The patients were grouped by treatment eras, based on major changes in therapy (i.e., single-agent or two-agent era, 1962-1972; standard multiagent era, 1972-1982; and intensive multiagent era, 1982-1990).

RESULTS

With increasingly intensive chemotherapy, more aggressive efforts to resect metastatic disease, and earlier detection of pulmonary metastases by computed tomography, the survival of these patients has improved significantly over the 28-year study period. Those treated since 1982 have a 50% estimated probability of survival at 3 years, whereas there were no survivors at 3 years in the two earlier eras. Survival for the former group reached a plateau of 30% at 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of aggressive multimodality therapy, coupled with modern pediatric imaging techniques to detect pulmonary disease, has improved the traditionally dismal outlook in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma and synchronous pulmonary metastases.

Juxtacortical osteosarcoma of the jaws

Osteosarcoma is a highly malignant tumour which despite modern surgery and chemotherapy still retains a relatively poor prognosis. This prognosis is, however, much better in the rare variant known as juxtacortical osteosarcoma. Both types of osteosarcoma mainly affect the long bones but the juxtacortical variant may be treated less aggressively and has a much better survival rate. The authors report four cases of juxtacortical osteosarcoma affecting the jaws and discuss these unusual tumours and their management.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremity. Long-term results of two consecutive prospective protocol studies

Seventy-six patients with classic high-grade osteosarcoma of an extremity received adjuvant chemotherapy by two protocols, initiated in 1972 and 1977, respectively, after appropriate amputations. Chemotherapy consisted of high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Dose intensity of high-dose methotrexate and doxorubicin was greater for the patients treated with the protocol initiated in 1977. The proportion of long-term disease-free survivors on the two protocols are 46% and 56%. A better outcome (P = 0.042) was seen for the latter group, which received more intensive chemotherapy. Overall, metastases developed in 35 patients; in 19 who were receiving chemotherapy and in 16 after chemotherapy. The outcome for these two protocols, compared with two control groups that were given no chemotherapy or ineffective chemotherapy (biweekly vincristine and cyclophosphamide), confirms the results of controlled studies that showed an advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy after amputation for osteosarcoma.

Prevention of acute pulmonary edema after bone marrow transplantation

In a retrospective review of 21 bone marrow transplantation procedures (BMT), we identified ten episodes of acute pulmonary edema coinciding with significant weight gain in the second week after BMT. When we prospectively observed nine consecutive BMT recipients, six patients developed acute pulmonary edema associated with significant (p less than 0.05) weight gain and an increase in echocardiographically determined left ventricular end diastolic diameter. These findings led to a prospective prophylactic intervention study of 30 consecutive BMT patients. Prophylactic intervention consisting of reduced fluid volume of parenteral alimentation, and diuretic therapy was instituted at any clinical sign of fluid overload. No episode of pulmonary edema occurred. The dramatic difference--acute pulmonary edema occurred in 16/30 untreated vs 0/30 treated cases--suggests that this post-BMT complication is critically related to fluid balance and can be prevented by careful clinical examination, close monitoring of weight change, avoidance of fluid overload and the appropriate use of diuretic therapy.

Morphology of pulmonary metastases from osteosarcoma during chemotherapy

Osteosarcoma is known to metastasize rather early, and even after surgical resection of the primary metastases may occur predominantly in the lung. Administration of polychemotherapy for destruction of micrometastases has served to improve prognosis. Preoperative chemotherapy facilitates the evaluation of regression, another factor of high prognostic relevance. Morphologic analysis of pulmonary metastases developing during chemotherapy is of considerable interest on account of the potential therapy resistance of certain histologic subtypes of osteosarcoma. In the present study pulmonary metastases resected in 20 thoracotomies of 15 osteosarcoma patients were investigated by light microscopy and compared, if possible, to the respective primaries. All patients had received chemotherapy, predominantly according to the COSS 80 and COSS 82 protocols. The histologic picture of a tumor was found to change from the primary to the pulmonary metastasis, a pattern also verified in the lung metastases collected in consecutive thoracotomies from the same patient. Several different subtypes were regularly found side by side in the metastases, but generally no special sensitivity or resistance to chemotherapy could be attributed to any of these subtypes. Our results nevertheless do indicate an increased resistance of anaplastic tumor tissue. The response to chemotherapy agreed in 9 of 10 primaries with that of their metastases.

Adriamycin-methotrexate high dose versus adriamycin-methotrexate moderate dose as adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities: a randomized study

Adjuvant chemotherapy comprising Adriamycin (ADM) and Methotrexate (MTX) with Citrovorum Factor (CF) was administered on a randomization basis to 2 groups of patients with osteosarcoma after surgical ablation of the primary tumor. One group received high dose MTX (regimen I) and the other moderate dose MTX (regimen II). In both groups a short period of heparin treatment was also administered to prevent neoplastic emboli during surgery. All patients were free of metastasis at the beginning of therapy. The efficacy of therapy was determined by recording the percentage of continuously disease-free patients. This was compared to the disease-free survival in 132 patients previously treated with other ADM or ADM-MTX regimens and to a group of 39 patients treated during this period with amputation only. The latter did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy for a variety of reasons and are equated to a concurrent control group. Over the ensuing 27-66 months, 31 of 56 patients (55%) treated with regimen I and 25 of 50 (50%) treated with regimen II were disease-free. The overall disease-free survival in both regimens was 53%. This is similar to the 132 patients treated with previous adjuvant chemotherapy protocols (45-50%). However, the percentage of continuously disease-free patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly better than the 39 patients (12%) treated contemporaneously with surgery only (P less than 0.0005). Survival in the latter is similar to that of historical control patients. These results do not suggest any change in the natural history of osteosarcoma and reveal benefits which may accrue with adjuvant chemotherapy. These results also demonstrate that in adjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma performed with ADM and MTX the high and the moderate doses of MTX are equally efficacious.

Control of primary osteosarcoma with chemotherapy

High-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor "rescue" (MTX-CF) produced an apparent complete response of the primary tumor in three patients with osteosarcoma. The response was sustained with MTX-CF, intra-arterial cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II (CDP) and Adriamycin (doxorubicin) for 18 months. Treatment was then electively discontinued. Local recurrence occurred in two patients, 6 and 4 months later, respectively. MTX-CF was reinstated and a complete response was again achieved in one patient. This has been maintained for 15+ months with MTX-CF and intra-arterial CDP administered for 13 of the 15+ months. Reinduction with MTX-CF failed in the second relapsed patient but an apparent remission was again achieved with radiation and intra-arterial CDP. This has been maintained with intravenous CDP, cyclophosphamide and phenylalanine mustard for 14+ months. A complete response in the primary tumor was still present in the nonrelapsed patient, 42 months from diagnosis. All patients have remained free of pulmonary metastases, 40+ to 42+ months from diagnosis.

Osteogenic sarcoma of the fourth thoracic vertebra. Long-term survival by chemotherapy only

A unique case of a 15-year-old boy with complete paraplegia due to the compression of osteogenic sarcoma at the fourth thoracic vertebra is presented. Because of the difficulty of surgical treatment, he was treated merely by the arterial infusion of Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and systemic chemotherapy in conformity with the cyclophosphamide, Oncovin (vincristine), methotrexate, phenylalanine mustard, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) ( COMPADRI )-III regimen. The patient regained normal function, and has been disease-free without any neurologic deficit for 6 years. There appears to be some hope for cure using chemotherapy only in otherwise unpromising patients.

Primary osteogenic sarcoma: the rationale for preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgery

From 1973--1975, 31 patients with biopsied primary osteogenic sarcoma were treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical ablation of the primary tumor. Surgery was delayed in order to obtain a custom-fitted prosthetic bone implant in an attempt to avoid amputation. Preoperative chemotherapy included high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) with citrovorum factor rescue (CFR) and adriamycin (T-5 protocol) and was administered for 3 months preoperatively and continued with the inclusion of cyclophosphamide for approximately 5 months postoperatively. At a follow-up period of 30--52 months, 23 of 31 patients (75%) are surviving (21 of 23 with no evidence of disease). Histologic examination of primary tumor removed at surgery revealed varying degrees of tumor destruction (from very little effect to no evidence of viable tumor) attributable to the effect of chemotherapy. The 21 patients that are disease-free survivors had a more complete effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the primary tumor. Some patients achieving favorable effects upon the primary tumor did so only after the dose of HDMTX was escalated to greater than the starting dose of 8 g/m2. Preoperative chemotherapy for all patients with osteogenic sarcoma would seem to offer the following advantages: 1) Evaluation of the effect of HDMTX with CFR on the primary tumor with escalation of the dose of HDMTX until a clinical response is observed, thus defining the dose of HDMTX effective in that patient, to be continued postoperatively as adjuvant therapy; 2) The early use of systemic therapy to eradicate distant microfoci of disease that will eventually kill the patient if not adequately treated by effective chemotherapy; 3) Allow more time for postoperative healing without the need to start adjuvant chemotherapy immediately; and 4) Provide the surgeon time to plan resection surgery. To date, 20 additional patients with biopsy proven osteogenic sarcoma have been treated with more aggressive preoperative chemotherapy (T-7) for approximately 2 1/2 months prior to definitive surgery (resection or amputation). Doses of HDMTX were escalated where necessary and good clinical responses were obtained in 19 of 20 patients. In the majority of patients, no evidence of viable tumor was found on histologic examination of the surgically removed primary tumor. All 20 patients are surviving free of active disease at this brief follow-up period of 4--20 months.

Surgical treatment of tendosynovial sarcoma

Tendosynovial sarcoma is notorious for its high rates of local recurrence and metastases after surgical treatment. A retrospective study was made of 109 cases of monobloc wide soft part resection and amputation for primary tumors, and 29 patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases. Actuarial five-year survival rates after soft part resection was 70% for untreated, and 61% for previously treated, locally recurrent neoplasms. Corresponding rates after amputation were 47% and 64%. Local tumor recurrence developed in 18% of the primary soft part resections and 4% of the amputations, usually when some basic surgical principle had been violated. 35% five-year survival was achieved with judicious resection of solitary and multiple lung metastases in most cases without chemotherapy. Local control of a tendosynovial sarcoma can be achieved with properly executed surgical procedures which adhere to established tenets of cancer surgery. Resection of pulmonary metastases merits an important position in the management of these patients.

Actual volume doubling time values for pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcomas

Doubling time values of pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcomas were measured. Sixty metastases from 24 patients were measured 79 consecutive times, and, the values for 116 doubling times were calculated. Small volume metastases grew significantly faster (arithmetic mean 29.7 days) than large metastases (arithmetic mean 43.4 days). An assessment with comparative data obtained previously by measuring the doubling time values of pulmonary metastases from osteogenic sarcoma revealed similar growth characteristics. The possible involvment of identical control mechanisms operating in the growth process of pulmonary metastases in both soft tissues and osteogenic sarcomas are discussed.

Transient cerebral dysfunction following chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma

An unusual neurological syndrome occurred in 4 of 158 patients treated for osteogenic sarcoma with combination chemotherapy. There was an abrupt onset of focal cerebral deficits approximately ten days after chemotherapy with vincristine and high-dose methotrexate plus citrovorum factor rescue. The syndrome was short lived and always occurred early in the course of treatment. Prolonged neurological deficits remained in 2 patients. When similar chemotherapy was reinstituted in the 4 patients, no further neurological complications ensued. Possible causes include a leukoencephalopathy related to methotrexate or an embolic cerebral vasculopathy related to necrotic tumor microemboli emanating from the lungs.

Thoracotomy as adjuvant to chemotherapy in metastatic osteogenic sarcoma

This is a review of the experience at Memorial Hospital using chemotherapy combined with surgical excision for control of pulmonary metastases in osteogenic sarcoma. Effective multiple drug chemotherapy was able to control small deposits of osteogenic sarcoma in the lung, making surgical resection of residual visible nodules worthwhile. Surgical resection was most successful for solitary nodules or where multiple nodules were shrunk or at least prevented from growing by chemotherapy. Eight percent of these patients with pulmonary metastases initially or subsequently showed bilateral lung disease. When two or more nodules were found at th oracotomy, they were never confined to one lobe. For these reasons, wedge resections or segmental resections were the most commonly indicated procedures. Results justify an aggressive surgical approach to these lesions including multiple wedge resections of all lesions found at thoracotomy, chest wall resection and multiple bilateral thoracotomies. Chemotherapy alone cannot be expected to cure metastatic osteogenic sarcoma of the lung, but combined with surgical resection of residual disease the results are encouraging.

Metastatic osteosarcoma to lung: a clinicopathologic study of surgical biopsies and resections

Metastatic tumor to the lungs is one of the most important factors in the poor prognosis of primary osteosarcoma of bone. Until recently, pulmonary resection alone was the only therapeutic method available to salvage these patients. Previous investigators have reviewed a number of clinical and pathologic parameters which may possibly relate to the prognosis of osteosarcoma and the occurrence of pulmonary metastases. The pathologic features of these latter lesions have received little attention other than to state that they generally are less differentiated than the primary tumor. A review of multiple pulmonary nodules resected from 15 patients has demonstrated that 66% of all lesions were essentially identical to the primary tumor. The 5-year survival from the original amputation was 33% in this series; however, it was not possible to prognosticate a favorable outcome from the metastasis, a similar type of observation which has been made by others in relation to the primary osteosarcoma.

Preliminary results of aggressive multimodality therapy for metastatic osteosarcoma

Ten patients with metastatic osteosarcoma were treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, the Sidney Farber Cancer Institute, and the Children's Hospital Medical Center from 1973 to 1976. Patients were treated with an aggressive multimodality approach with included surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Three of 10 patients are alive with no evidence of disease, five are alive, with disease, and two are dead of disease. The median survival is 12+ months. Local control data for radiation combined with high dose methotrexate in metastatic osteosarcoma is shown.

Radiation in bone sarcomas: a re-evaluation in the era of intensive systemic chemotherapy

We have reviewed the literature and described experience in treating Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma before and during the era of intensive systemic chemotherapy. Local control of Ewing's sarcoma may relate to increasing doses of radiation, especially when intensive chemotherapy is administered also. Problems of radiation enhancement by chemotherapy have caused us to reconsider time-dose and volume parameters in treating these patients. The role of radiation in osteogenic sarcoma is limited to patients with inoperable lesions and metastases.

Multidisciplinary treatment for macrometastatic osteogenic sarcoma

Using a co-ordinated multidisciplinary approach with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, 14 out of 21 patients with metastases from osteogenic sarcoma were rendered free of disease for over two to over 18 months. Most patients had pulmonary metastases, two had bony metastases, and one had metastases in the iliac nodes. As part of this multidisciplinary approach weekly high-dose methotrexate was given and caused tumour regression in seven out of 15 patients. After all clinical evidence of disease had been removed high-dose methotrexate was administered every two to three weeks as maintenance treatment. To assess the efficacy of treatment the results were compared with those in a historical control group of 82 consecutive patients who developed pulmonary or other metastases. The results in the study group were significantly better. This experience may be similar to that in Wilms's tumour, where actinomycin D has increased the cure rate when administered as adjuvant therapy after treatment of localised or overt metastatic disease.

Quantification of combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy effects on critical normal tissues

In order to determine the modification of radiation effects on critical normal tissues which occurs with combinations of radiation and cancer chemotherapy, a review of laboratory and clinical data has been carried out. Information on 10 different normal tissues is available. It is clear that the antibiotic cancer chemotherapeutic agents are the most likely to enhance radiation injury, with increased levels reported in all tissues except the central nervous system. The second most common type of injury with combination therapy appears to occur with drugs causing injury to the normal tissue on their own, such as adriamycin in the heart and methotrexate in the central nervous system. Quantification of the dose-effect factor is only available on a limited number of tissues, and, primarily, in experimental animals. From these limited data, it is clear that dose-effect factors between 1.1 and 1.8 are seen, indicating that radiation doses must be reduced by 10-80% for the same level of injury when combined with chemotherapy. The augmentation of radiation damage by cancer chemotherapeutic agents is a serious problem in a wide range of tissues, but a problem which can be dealt with by accurate knowledge as to the dose-effect factor and appropriate modification of the radiation treatment.