A randomized trial of the combination of cis-platinum, oncovin and bleomycin (COB) versus methotrexate in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

Overview of Dual-Acting Drug Methotrexate in Different Neurological Diseases, Autoimmune Pathologies and Cancers

Methotrexate, a structural analogue of folic acid, is one of the most effective and extensively used drugs for treating many kinds of cancer or severe and resistant forms of autoimmune diseases. In this paper, we take an overview of the present state of knowledge with regards to complex mechanisms of methotrexate action and its applications as immunosuppressive drug or chemotherapeutic agent in oncological combination therapy. In addition, the issue of the potential benefits of methotrexate in the development of neurological disorders in Alzheimer’s disease or myasthenia gravis will be discussed.

Comorbidity and Prognosis in Advanced Hypopharyngeal-Laryngeal cancer under Combined Therapy

Aims and background

The success of combined treatment in head and neck cancer resides largely in its completion, which can be compromised when the patient's general health status is precarious. The objective of this investigation was to study the role of comorbidity as a prognostic factor in a large, homogeneous population affected by locally advanced pharyngeal-laryngeal cancer, under a combined protocol treatment. The a priori hypothesis is that comorbidity strongly conditions overall survival and specific overall survival in these patients and can aid in the selection and individualization of treatments.

Methods

After a 24-month follow-up, a univariate and multivariate retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors was performed using 14 clinical, pathological and molecular variables including the comorbidity index calculated following the Picarillo method. The settings were the Otolaryngology, Oncology and Pathology Departments of the Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain, a referral center of the National Health System. Of the original 114 patients selected, 15 were withdrawn because the tumor spread to maxillofacial areas, or due to the lack of attendance at the clinic, incomplete clinical data or coexistent primary tumors. The group under analysis consisted of the 99 remaining patients affected by stage III and IV laryngeal and/or hypopharyngeal cancers that had not received previous treatments. The main outcomes to analyze were overall survival, specific overall survival and relative risk.

Results

Overall survival at 2.5 years was 68.1% (95% CI, 57.7–78.5). Specific overall survival at 2.5 years was 74.8% (95% CI, 64.9–84.6). In the multivariate analysis, tumor staging, neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and comorbidity (RR = 1.55 and 1.44 for overall and specific overall survival, respectively) present themselves as three prognostic factors independent of overall and specific overall survival.

Conclusions

The role of comorbidity as an independent prognostic factor in patients affected by laryngeal and/or hypopharyngeal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy should be taken into account in the tailoring of treatments and the improvement of therapeutic results.

Temporal changes in the efficacy of chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RMSCCHN), but its effectiveness is debatable. We hypothesized palliative chemotherapy efficacy has decreased due to intensification of primary treatment, and investigated this by examining time trends of objective response rates (ORRs) in published reports of randomized trials (RCTs).

METHODS

RCTs with at least one arm studying chemotherapy alone in RMSCCHN patients and reporting ORR were identified and data extracted. Eligible regimens had at least 6 trial arms reporting ORR over 20 years. Weighted linear regressions of ORR by year of publication for eligible regimens were done, and predictors of ORR and survival were examined.

RESULTS

Three regimens were eligible for analysis: low dose methotrexate, single agent cisplatin, and cisplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil (PF). Linear regression showed decreasing ORRs over time for all three regimens studied: 23.5 to 9.8% (1980-2010) for methotrexate (p=0.06), 19.6 to 8.8% (1980-2010) for cisplatin (p=0.0013), and 37.6 to 27.9% (1990-2010) for PF (p=0.11). Trial sample size, oropharynx cancer primary site, use of PF, and prior treatment increased over time. Use of PF and year of publication were the strongest predictors of ORR.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm the limited effectiveness of currently available palliative chemotherapy regimens for RMSCCHN patients. Novel therapeutics offering improvements in quality and quantity of life are urgently needed for these patients. Based on these results, the study of such agents as first-line therapy in RMSCCHN patients is entirely justifiable.

Systemic therapy in head and neck cancer: changing paradigm

Head and neck cancers comprise a heterogenous group of cancers that require a multidisciplinary approach. Last few decades have seen an increasing role of chemotherapy with intent of treatment shifting from palliation to cure. We performed a thorough search online and offline for all relevant articles of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Cancers of nasopharynx and salivary glands were excluded.

Management of recurrent head and neck cancer: recent progress and future directions

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is on the rise in the US despite a drop in cigarette smoking rates. Much of this rise is due to the increasing incidence of SCCHN attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV-related SCCHN has a high cure rate, which contributes to the stable death rates despite the increased incidence. Up to half of patients with SCCHN will develop recurrence. For these patients, the first clinical decision is whether the recurrence is potentially treatable for cure, or is incurable. For those deemed potentially curable, surgical or radiation-based therapies, or both, are undertaken. For those who have incurable recurrences, the goals are palliation and possibly prolongation of life - average survivals are in the range of 6-12 months depending on the type of recurrence and other factors. Several chemotherapy drugs are active in SCCHN, most notably the platinum compounds, taxanes, fluorouracil (5-FU), methotrexate and cetuximab. Approximately 10-25% of patients will respond to treatment with one of these drugs. The response rate is higher for combinations such as a platinum plus a taxane, a platinum plus 5-FU, a combination of the three, or one of more of these drugs plus cetuximab. Combination chemotherapy has not been shown to prolong survival over single-agent therapy, with the exception of the addition of cetuximab to a platinum and 5-FU combination. A number of orally bioavailable tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been tested or are undergoing trials in SCCHN. None of these has as yet been shown to be more effective than the currently available drugs. For patients with recurrences who are undergoing active therapy, and especially for those for whom further therapy is no longer appropriate or is declined, strict attention is necessary to palliation of pain, oral and airway issues, and to nutrition, speech, and social and psychological issues.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 28th July 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other possible sources of bias. Data were extracted using a specially designed form and entered into the characteristics of included studies table and the analysis sections of the review. The proportion of participants in each trial with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are recorded in Additional Table 1.

MAIN RESULTS

There was no statistically significant improvement in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone in 25 trials (hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone in 10 trials (HR of mortality 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99), and there was an additional benefit of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy in 4 of these trials (HR of mortality 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98). Concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone in patients whose tumours were considered unresectable in 25 trials (HR of mortality 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). However, the additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy is associated with a 9% increase in survival and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a 16% increase in overall survival following surgery. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed a 22% benefit in overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone.

Prognosis after salvage chemotherapy for locally unresectable recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

For locally unresectable recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, we investigated two salvage chemotherapy regimens as second-line chemotherapy. In our preliminary study, we observed that both regimens were active. In the present study we analyzed the prognosis of these patients.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with recurrent advanced head and neck cancer, were treated with one of two new regimens as second-line chemotherapy. The PEM regimen consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, etoposide 40 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 and mitomycin-C 7 mg/m2 on day 1. The long CF regimen consisted of cisplatin 8 mg/m2 on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19 and 22-26 and 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 as a 24 h infusion or oral administration of tegaful-uracil (UFT-E) 400 mg/m2 on days 1-28. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log rank test.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients evaluable for response, three complete responses (CR) and seven partial responses (PR) were achieved, with an overall response rate of 42%. Myelosuppression was the major side effect. One year survival was 100% for CR, 0% for PR and 20% for minor response (MR). All patients who failed to achieve a CR died within 12 months, except one patient with MR.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that with these salvage regimens survival benefit was demonstrated only in CR patients.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: A retrospective analysis of 36 cases

36 patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the maxillary sinuses formed the basis of this review. There were 16 T3 and 20 T4. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy alone in 21 cases and radiotherapy followed by systemic chemotherapy in 15 cases. The median survival for all analysed patients was 19 months and the 3-year and 5-year estimated survivals were 30% and 17%. The respective 3-and 5-year survival probabilities were 19% and 9% for patients treated with radiotherapy alone and 40% and 27% for patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (p= 0.01). Our findings seem to suggest that the addititon of systemic chemotherapy to radiotherapy may imporve overall survival in advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the maxillary sinuses.

The role of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

We studied the effect of cytoreductive chemotherapy in head and neck cancer and analyzed it in terms of efficacy, remission rates, and duration, as well effect on survival. Single-agent chemotherapy, which formerly was used as a palliative therapy in recurrent and metastatic disease, had little affect on survival. More recently, multi-agent chemotherapy trials have shown significantly higher response rates, but this success has not translated into an added survival benefit. These findings led to the introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy into the induction (neoadjuvant) clinical setting. In these clinical circumstances, better objective response rates were found, particularly in the previously untreated patient. Although this therapy has resulted in better control of local disease, the impact on survival is not yet clear. Adjuvant chemotherapy is most useful in patients who have a high risk of relapse. Therapy appears to decrease its incidence, particularly at distant sites. Finally, chemoradiation trials have shown that this treatment provides a survival advantage, but at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity.

Combination chemotherapy as induction therapy for advanced resectable head and neck cancer

Fifty-four previously untreated patients with locally advanced resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were enrolled into a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy improves the disease-free survival compared to the standard treatment (surgery + radiation). Thirty patients received chemotherapy, which consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 day 1-5, bleomycin 10 mg/m2, continuous infusion from day 3-7, and methotrexate 40 mg/m2 given on day 15 and day 22. The cycle was repeated on day 29 for two cycles. Twenty patients completed chemotherapy courses. Overall response rate was 77% (23 of 30). No survival improvement was observed. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated survival (and 95% confidence interval) at 3 years was 57% (29%-84%) for the control group and 60% (34%-87%) for the chemotherapy group, and 57% (29%-84%) and 45% (12%-78%) at 4 years (P = 0.736). However, patients who had a complete response were significantly better in terms of long-term survivors (5 of 7 patients were still alive), in contrast to patients who had partial responses among whom only 4 of 16 were alive. Toxicities of this induction protocol are tolerable; one chemotherapy-related death occurred from profound thrombocytopenia. If efforts in determining a chemotherapy-sensitive patient were successfully established, along with a better sequence and the discovery of new and safer drugs, survival of SCCHN should be much improved.

Chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

Chemotherapy has been used for many years as a palliative approach to advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Regimens employed have slowly evolved during this time, and the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is still standard chemotherapy for such a tumour. However, clinical approaches to advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are changing dramatically as physicians become increasingly familiar with multidisciplinary treatments. Integrating chemotherapy and radiotherapy, neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatments and organ preservation are stimulating fields of investigation involving chemotherapy which definitely warrant further investigation.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone.

RESULTS

The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

Evidence-based recommendations against neoadjuvant chemotherapy for routine management of patients with squamous cell head and neck cancer

The objective of this study was to determine appropriate recommendations for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC). Published reports of randomized trials of neoadjuvant versus standard therapy in patients with stage III and stage IV HNC were identified by literature search. The overall trial results were analyzed using three pooling techniques: vote count, weighted median survival, and meta-analysis of published survival data. Excluded from analysis were articles on intra-arterial therapy, studies without a standard treatment control arm, studies that included adjuvant therapy, and abstracts. Twelve studies were evaluable for vote count, 11 for weighted median survival analysis, and 10 for quantitative meta-analysis. By vote count there was no observed survival difference in 7 trials, a trend favoring control in 3, a statistically significant difference favoring control in 1, and a trend favoring neoadjuvant therapy in 1. The weighted median survival was 20.9 months for control versus 20.0 months for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with consistent trends for resectable and nonresectable disease and for chemotherapy combinations versus single agents. The common odds ratios for deaths at 12, 24, and 36 months were 1.12, 1.27, and 1.11, respectively, all in favor of control treatment. Data generated using rigorous methodological standards indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy should not be offered to patients with locally advanced HNC if improved survival is the outcome of interest. It is premature to recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy to preserve organ function, although patients should be aware of this option and the limitations of the current data.

Epirubicin, methotrexate and bleomycin in the management of recurrent squamous cell head and neck cancer. A GSTTC randomised phase II study

53 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck recurrent after initial treatment were entered into a phase II trial of the epirubicin, methotrexate and bleomycin (EMB) combination. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the activity of this combination. Compliance to EMB and the possible non-cross-resistance to previous cisplatin-containing chemotherapy were secondary objectives. In order to avoid patient selection bias, the study involved randomisation between EMB and a cisplatin-methotrexate-bleomycin (DMB) combination (with EMB: DMB = 2:1). 23 out of 53 (43% +/- 13) EMB patients showed an objective response, lasting a median of 12 (range 4-39) weeks; interestingly, 5 out of 14 (36% +/- 25) patients pretreated with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil responded to EMB. The treatment compliance was good and a median of three courses was delivered. No patient refused the treatment after the initial cycle. Leukopenia (47%) and oral mucositis (42%) were the main side effects. DMB produced a response rate of 33% +/- 18 with a median duration of 5 (4-13) weeks. None of the patients previously treated with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil responded. 5 patients refused the treatment after the first cycle and a median of two cycles (0-5) was delivered. In conclusion, EMB produced results similar to cisplatin-containing regimens, with a mild to moderate toxicity and a good compliance; the possible non cross-resistance with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil deserves further evaluation.

Phase II trial of 4'-0-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (pirarubicin) in head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

4'-0-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (Pirarubicin, Meiji Seika (USA) Inc., New York, NY) may be less toxic than doxorubicin.

METHODS

A Phase II trial of Pirarubicin was done in 26 patients who had not previously had chemotherapy and who had measurable and incurable head and neck carcinoma. All patients received an intravenous bolus dose of 60 mg/m2 Pirarubicin in the first cycle without any prophylactic antiemetic. The cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Based on tumor response, nadir counts, or complications of myelosuppression, the doses were escalated or de-escalated by 10 mg/m2, if necessary, in the second cycle to achieve mild leukopenia (3000-4000 leukocytes/microliters).

RESULTS

Leukopenia was mild, moderate (2000-2999 leukocytes/microliters), severe (1000-1999 leukocytes/microliters), and life threatening (less than 1000 leukocytes/microliters) in 13%, 31%, 27%, and 9% of the first two courses, respectively. The median interval to nadir leukopenia was 13 days (range, 7-21 days), with a median of 8 days (range, 5-13 days) to recover to normal. One patient with a leukocyte count of 800/microliters and an absolute granulocyte count (AGC) of 488/microliters died of sepsis 15 days after the first course. All patients had at least one course that resulted in leukopenia. One episode each of mild (100,000-150,000 platelets/microliters) and severe (25,000-49,999 platelets/microliters) thrombocytopenia occurred in the first two courses. Leukocyte, granulocyte, and platelet counts were not done routinely after the second cycle. Six patients who received four or more courses with cumulative doses of 310, 610, 340, 260, 660, and 550 mg/m2 had decrements of 0%, 1%, 7%, 10%, 12%, and 13%, respectively, in radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). All other toxic effects were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 24 patients with disease evaluable for response to Pirarubicin therapy, 1 had a complete response that lasted 5 months and 4 had a partial response of 2, 3, 6, and 8 months. The median survival time in patients with disease that responded to Pirarubicin therapy was 27 months; in patients with disease that did not respond to Pirarubicin therapy, the median survival time was 4 months, and in the total cohort, it was 5 months. Pirarubicin was well tolerated and was an active agent in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Current chemotherapy of head and neck cancer

This article reviews the results of over 50 published trials testing the use of chemotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Among the trials using chemotherapy before standard surgery and/or radiotherapy in stage III and IV disease, none has shown an improvement in survival compared with surgery and/or radiotherapy alone. In these studies, the survival at 3 to 5 years has been generally 40% to 50%. Several trials using chemotherapy after standard therapy, however, have reported survival benefits of 10% to 20%, suggested that further evaluation of classic adjuvant chemotherapy in this disease is warranted. Among studies in recurrent head and neck cancer, the most effective chemotherapy regimens appear to be variations of the program consisting of cisplatin followed by a 5-day infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Nevertheless, median survivals in recurrent disease remain short, generally 5 to 10 months.

Preliminary trial of nonrecombinant interferon alpha in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Fourteen patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were treated with 10 x 10(6) U of nonrecombinant interferon alpha (IFN) intramuscularly (IM) daily for 3 days every 28 days. There were 11 men and 3 women, with ages ranging from 48 to 74 years. Patients had previously been treated with surgery (9 patients), radiotherapy (13 patients), or chemotherapy (8 patients). All patients had measurable disease by physical exam and radiologic evaluation and a performance status of less than or equal to 2 (ECOG). Patients were treated for a minimum of 3 months and continued on therapy until disease progression. The dose and treatment schedule of IFN was well-tolerated. Toxicities included low-grade fever, mild anorexia, and malaise. Treatment was stopped in 1 patient due to the development of atrial fibrillation. One death occurred as a complication of aspiration pneumonia 2 weeks following the onset of therapy and was not felt to be related to IFN therapy. Of the 14 patients treated, there was 1 complete response (30+ months) of a base of tongue primary. Two patients had stabilization of disease (SD, 8 and 12 months). One patient had a mixed response with resolution of subcutaneous nodules. The remaining 10 patients died of progressive disease. Immunological assessment was performed on 8 patients. The 1 patient who had a complete response was noted to have markedly low pretreatment natural killer (NK) cell activity and a subsequent sharp rise in activity after initial treatment. We conclude that low-dose cyclic IFN is well-tolerated in patients with recurrent SCCHN and has potential antitumor activity.

Phase II trial of carboplatin and vinblastine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

A chemotherapy regimen consisting of carboplatin and vinblastine was given to 30 patients with recurrent or previously untreated, locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck region. The main aim of the study was to assess the toxicity of this regimen, the feasibility of its outpatient administration and the tumour response. A total of ten patients (33%) achieved an objective response, including two who achieved a complete response. The combination offered useful palliation for patients with recurrent disease; it was well tolerated and can be given on an outpatient basis. This regimen could be combined with other active agents such as methotrexate or bleomycin.

Comparative study of the sensitivity of head and neck cell lines to methotrexate (MTX) and the analog 10-ethyl, 10-deazaaminopterin (10-EdAM)

Squamous cell lines cultured in vitro provide a potential test system for the selection of analogs that have an improved therapeutic index. The growth inhibitory effects of methotrexate and the new folate analog 10-ethyl, 10-deazaaminopterin were compared in three in vitro-cultured human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. The inhibitory concentrations of the new analog were 10- to 100-fold lower than the inhibitory concentrations of methotrexate. The sensitivity of these three head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines to both drugs was essentially the same as the sensitivity of a rhabdomyosarcoma cell line known to be very sensitive to methotrexate when the cell line is grown as a xenograft in athymic nude mice. These data indicate that 10-ethyl, 10-deazaaminopterin may be a new and effective agent against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Cis-diamminodichloroplatinum plus a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of locally recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer patients

A group of 23 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer were treated with cisplatinum, 100 mg/m2 i.v., on day 1 plus 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2, in continuous infusion for 5 days. Most patients (87%) had recurrent or metastatic cancer and were previously treated (78%). Out of 21 evaluable patients we obtained a 42% overall response rate (complete + partial responses) with a mean duration of more than 8 months and a 14% minimal response rate. A stabilization of disease was achieved in 28% of cases, while 14% of patients progressed. This response rate, as well as the duration of response, seems to be similar to those obtained in other series comprising previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic head and neck carcinoma. The toxicity was generally acceptable, with few cases of grade 3 (WHO criteria) toxicity. However most patients required hospitalization because of the length of treatment. In conclusion the response rate and the duration of responses obtained with cisplatinum plus a 5-day infusion of 5-FU in advanced or metastatic pretreated patients is, at present, unsatisfactory, even if the impact on survival is still not entirely clear.

Treatment of advanced and/or metastatic epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck: an effective combination chemotherapy with bleomycin, methotrexate and ftorafur

29 evaluable patients with advanced and/or metastatic epidermoid carcinomas of the head and neck were treated with a combination of bleomycin, methotrexate and ftorafur. 3 complete remission, 12 partial remission (objective response 51.7%), 10 stable disease and 4 progressed disease were obtained, with the best responses in the oral cavity and skin carcinomas. The grade of performance status and the pretreatments affected the response, with a very high response rate in nonpretreated patients, where objective results were obtained in all cases. The toxicity was very mild. We believe that this combination can be recommended for epidermoid carcinomas of the skin and oral cavity, considering its high response rate, feasibility and low toxicity.

Chemotherapy in head and neck cancer with bleomycin, cisplatinum, and methotrexate

Results of chemotherapy in head and neck cancers are reported with a regimen of cisplatinum, bleomycin and methotrexate. In 63 previously untreated patients, the overall response rate was 73%, including 13/63 CR and 33/63 PR. The response rate in 20 previously treated tumors was 20%. The chemotherapy protocol was well tolerated without severe complications. Initial chemotherapy as a third modality in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery is discussed.

Chemotherapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma. A 10-year experience at Wayne State University

The role of chemotherapy in the management of patients with cancer of the paranasal sinus has not been defined. An analysis of 24 evaluable patients treated with chemotherapy as part of their overall therapy was performed. There were 16 male patients and eight female patients. Sixteen patients were previously untreated and eight had recurrent disease after surgery and/or radiotherapy. Six of the previously untreated patients had metastatic disease on presentation (four central nervous system (CNS) and two lung), and four recurrent patients had CNS involvement. The majority of patients (78%) had squamous cell carcinoma. The chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (CDDP), vincristine (VCR), and bleomycin (COB), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and CDDP, or 5-FU/CDDP and methotrexate (MTX). All patients had computed tomography (CT) measurable disease. Previously untreated patients underwent surgery and/or radiotherapy postchemotherapy. The overall response rate to chemotherapy for previously untreated patients was 82% (complete response [CR] 44%, partial response [PR] 38%) and for recurrent patients 88% (CR 38%, PR 50%). Predominant toxicities were nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, mucositis, and renal impairment. The median survival of the previously untreated patients, based on response to chemotherapy, was as follows: CR 21+ months (range, 10+ to 81 months), PR 13.5 months (range, 2 to 21 months), and no response (NR) 3 months (range, 1 to 7 months). The median survival of patients with recurrent disease was as follows: CR 16 months, PR 13.5 months, and NR 5 months. We conclude that patients with paranasal cancers are responsive to CDDP-containing combinations. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated, locally advanced patients needs to be demonstrated by future randomized trials.

The application of a two-stage design for clinical trials in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer

Cytotoxic chemotherapy produces modest benefits for patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Prospective randomized clinical trials have failed to demonstrate unequivocal superiority of aggressive multidrug regimens over single agents. Despite this, phase II trials frequently result in encouraging preliminary observations that compare favorably to historical single-agent data. While providing for a useful method of screening for anti-tumor activity, phase II studies have limited use in determining the relative value of a new treatment program. Results of phase II studies are considerably influenced by patient selection factors and criteria used to establish therapeutic benefits (responses). Furthermore, estimations of true levels of efficacy (response rates) are dependent on sample sizes, which are usually limited in such trials. We propose that newly developed combinations containing at least one known active agent in this disease should be tested in a controlled setting after their toxicity pattern has been well established. The conduct of the usual phase II study in these situations will probably not provide useful new information, since responses are likely to be observed. We describe a two-stage design applied to terminate a trial if at the first stage there is no evidence of improvement over the control arm. This method allows for early termination of studies involving relatively inefficient treatment regimens and, at the same time, continuation of those with a high likelihood to result in significant therapeutic improvements over a control arm. Loss of power is negligible and sample sizes can be reduced significantly. The rationale behind this method and its simplicity are attractive features for a widespread application for new drug development strategies in this and other diseases.

Chemotherapeutic management of head and neck cancer

The use of chemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer is increasing. In patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, a large number of chemotherapeutic drugs have shown antitumor activity. These drugs are discussed, and factors which influence response rate and survival are examined. New agents and treatment, including specific agents for combination chemotherapy, are presented. There has been a search for new treatments or procedures in patients with previously untreated and locally advanced cancer of the head and neck. The results, including studies of combined modality therapy and chemotherapy after surgery, are discussed. Chemotherapy in tumor of the salivary glands is briefly discussed, followed by an examination of intra-arterial therapy.

Regional chemotherapy through a saphenous vein graft for the treatment of head and neck cancers

Regional chemotherapy was given through a vein grafted between the common carotid and external carotid arteries to 20 patients who had a variety of advanced head and neck cancers. The objective response rate was 73.6%, which included 36.8% complete response. The median duration of response was more than 10 months. The toxicity was mild and well tolerated. The complication rate associated with the procedure was low. This form of regional chemotherapy has significant advantages over the conventional form that uses drugs given through the retrograde temporal artery because the catheter-related complications are eliminated, the perfusion of the tumor can be maintained consistently, and, consequently, the response rate is high and the duration of response is increased.

Combination chemotherapy with methotrexate, bleomycin, and vincristine with or without cisplatin in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

A total of 185 eligible patients with advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized into two groups; the cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin, and vincristine (CABO) group received cisplatin (50 mg/m2; day 4), methotrexate (40 mg/m2; days 1, 15), bleomycin (10 mg; days 1, 8, and 15), and vincristine (2 mg; days 1, 8, and 15) and the ABO group received methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine in the same doses on days 1, 8, and 15. After three courses, patients in both arms received weekly methotrexate as maintenance therapy; those 34 patients with previously untreated locoregional disease went off the study because of subsequent locoregional treatment in form of radiotherapy +/- surgery. The complete response rate was 16% in patients receiving CABO, compared with 5% among patients given ABO. The corresponding overall response rates were 50% and 28%, respectively (P = 0.003). Among patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, progression was delayed in patients receiving CABO (median, 18 weeks) compared to those receiving ABO (median, 14 weeks) (P = 0.07), but there was no difference in survival time. Myelosuppression consisted mostly of leukopenia, which was seen in 67% of the CABO patients versus 47% in the other arm. Myelosuppression-associated infection and hemorrhage led to death in two patients in the CABO treatment group and six patients in the ABO treatment group. Nausea and vomiting, mostly of grades 1 or 2, occurred in 93% of the patients given CABO and 44% of those receiving ABO. Other toxic effects--neuropathy, alopecia, stomatitis, constipation, fever/chills, diarrhea, cutaneous alterations, and renal impairment--occurred equally in the two treatment groups. This study underlines the role of cisplatin in head and neck cancer, although no impact on survival could be demonstrated. It also supports indirectly the superiority of combination chemotherapy over single-agent treatment for this disease.

Management of advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Squamous cell tumors of the head and neck make up 5% of tumors diagnosed in this country. The combination of excessive tobacco and alcohol use is the most common causative factor for these tumors. Their natural history is characterized by a tendency for early local-regional recurrence and the late appearance of distant metastases. A significant proportion of patients present with advanced (stage III or IV) disease, which has a poor prognosis when treated with surgery and radiotherapy. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery and radiotherapy in previously untreated patients holds promise for improving cure rates in patients with this disease. The use of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent head and neck tumors results in response in approximately one third of patients. The majority of these responses are partial and short-lived, but those patients achieving a complete remission appear to have a significant prolongation of survival. The combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with advanced disease is being tested in a number of trials. It is hoped that this combination will increase the response rate and result in prolonged survival.

Adjuvant chemotherapy

At present, adjuvant chemotherapy exerts no significant impact on long-term survival and only occasionally provides brief palliation in head and neck cancer. The major contribution of chemotherapy has been in the preoperative period, when therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma may render some patients candidates for curative operations or radiotherapy. This article discusses the use of single-agent chemotherapy, combination chemotherapy, and combination irradiation and surgery as well as the advantages of adjuvant chemosurgery.

Chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. Comparison of cisplatin + vinblastine + bleomycin versus methotrexate

One hundred ninety-one patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck origin were allocated at random to chemotherapy with conventional-dose weekly intravenous methotrexate or the combination of cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin. Methotrexate induced responses in 16 of 98 patients (16%), whereas 22 of 92 (24%) responded to the combination regimen (P = not significant). Remission duration (20.2 weeks methotrexate; 15.1 weeks combination) was similar on both arms, as was survival (31.4 weeks methotrexate; 29.0 weeks combination). Therapy was relatively well-tolerated on both treatment arms, although methotrexate produced more mucositis and the combination more gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. Response to chemotherapy and disease confined to the locoregional area were associated with somewhat longer survival. Combination chemotherapy as given in this study did not improve any observed parameter, and the results of treatment were poor in both arms.

Therapeutic Association for Nasopharyngeal Cancer

The authors studied retrospectively 16 cases of malignant epithelial nasopharyngeal tumors which were treated at the Head and Neck Service of the Heliópolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brasil, from December 1977 to December 1983. The treatment was intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) followed by radiotherapy. The chemotherapeutic schedules were: a) methotrexate and vincristine, b) methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (2 different schedules) and c) methotrexate, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatinum. Objective responses to IAC were observed in 18.6 % of the cases. Only 3 patients are alive at 26, 37 and 53 months; 2 of them had exhibited response to IAC. The authors analyze the results and suggest randomized trials in order to determine the exact effects of this method of treatment.

Combined modality treatment of head and neck cancer with cisplatin, bleomycin, methotrexate-leucovorin chemotherapy

The multidisciplinary treatment results of 114 patients with advanced, untreated Stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region are reported. Induction chemotherapy with two cycles of cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day intravenous bolus days 1 through 5, bleomycin 10 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion days 3 through 7, and methotrexate 200 mg/m2 intravenous bolus on days 15 and 22 with leucovorin rescue was utilized before definitive surgery and/or radiation therapy. The total response rate was 78% with 30 (26%) patients achieving complete response and 59 (52%) patients achieving partial response. Patient age, performance status, histologic grade of tumor, and tumor site did not predict response to chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy was well tolerated with myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity being dose-limiting in a few patients. The toxicity of subsequent local treatment with surgery and/or radiation is reported with an analysis of local treatment failures. A strong correlation was noted between local control of tumor and postchemotherapy tumor size before local treatment.

Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma--two long term disease-free remissions with non-cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy

Two cases of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma following maximal radiotherapy are presented. Both patients had complete resolution of disease with outpatient combination chemotherapy using Vincristine, Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide (VAC), and are disease free, and working full time, 3 and 4 years later, respectively. The significant relapse rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after initial radiotherapy is outlined, and the reported limitations of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in this situation are discussed. The survival curve for this disease appears to plateau at 2-3 years. This appears to be the first reported outpatient combination chemotherapy programme to produce long term disease-free remission in recurrent disease.

Treatment alternatives. Head and neck cancers

No tumor system is more amenable to multidiscipline therapy than head and neck cancers. Diagnosis is enhanced by fine-needle cytology, computerized tomography (CT) scan, and tumor markers. Modified surgical techniques, CO2 laser, and immediate myocutaneous flap reconstruction have enhanced surgery. Endocurie therapy, radiosensitizers, and particle therapy supplementation have enhanced radiotherapy. Combination chemotherapy, immunotherapy, prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, and retinoids have enhanced chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy is optimum multidisciplinary therapy. Reduction in exposure to tobacco, alcohol, sunlight, gamma irradiation, occupational toxins, and Epstein-Barr virus, and recognizing high-risk hereditary conditions, can help prevent these cancers.

Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with recurrent and disseminated epidermoid cancer of the head and neck

The combination of cisplatin and 96-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was evaluated in 30 patients with recurrent (local and regional) and disseminated histologically proven epidermoid cancer of the head and neck who failed surgery and radiotherapy. Cisplatin 100 mg/M2 intravenous (IV) bolus was given on day 1 with hydration and mannitol diuresis; 5-FU 1000 mg/M2 per day for 96-hour infusion was started immediately after cisplatin on day 1. All patients had measurable lesions. Eight (27%) patients achieved complete response (CR), and 13 (43%) had partial response (PR). Overall response rate was 70% (8 of 30 CR and 13 of 30 PR). Response rate in patients with recurrent local and regional disease was 89% (17/19) with median survival of 32 weeks, while response in patients with disseminated disease was 36% (4/11) with median survival of 24 weeks. Patients with good performance status (PS) (greater than or equal to 70%) had a response rate of 79% (19/24), while those with poor PS (less than 70%) had a response rate of 33% (2/6). Seven patients with recurrent disease who had a response to this chemotherapy went to further salvage surgical procedures. It is concluded that the combination of cisplatin and 5-FU is very effective and well tolerated in these patients, and leads to further salvage in some patients with improved longevity and quality of life.

Chemotherapy strategies in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Traditionally, chemotherapy has been utilized in the palliation of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The introduction of more effective agents has spawned many new multi-drug protocols as the initial therapy of patients with previously untreated advanced cancers (Stages III and IV). The combination of cis-platinum and other active agents given in two to three courses has produced overall response rates of 80 to 90% with clinically complete response rates of 20 to 54%. Many of the complete responders were histologically negative for cancer at the time of resection. The number of courses, stage (T and N), and tumor morphology influenced the complete response rate to combination chemotherapy. Responders to chemotherapy had statistically improved survival as compared to nonresponders. Response to chemotherapy was an excellent predictor for subsequent response to radiotherapy. Utilizing the same combination of chemotherapy, we improved the overall response rate in those patients with recurrent and systemic cancer. Although the median survival is still poor, there is improvement of survival at 25 percentile level. Some of the important factors that may influence the response rate and the survival of these patients are performance status, previous radiotherapy, and whether the recurrence is localized or systemic.