Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with recurrent and disseminated epidermoid cancer of the head and neck

Comparison the Acute Toxicity of Two Different Induction Chemotherapy Schedules with Cisplatin and Fluorouracil in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the acute toxicity of two different induction chemotherapy (IndCT) regimen followed by the same IMRT in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2015 to December 2016, 110 NPC patients with stage III-IV diseases were prospectively randomized to receive either a conventional triweekly cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (PF) for 3 cycles or weekly P-F for 10 doses, followed by the same IMRT to both arms. The primary endpoints of this study were grade 3/4 and any grade acute toxicities during IndCT period. The secondary endpoints included tumor response and various survivals.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Patients who received weekly P-F experienced significant reduction of grade 3/4 acute toxicities, including neutropenia (12.7% vs. 40.0%, P=0.0012), anorexia (0% vs. 14.6%, P=0.0059), mucositis (0% vs. 14.6%, P=0.0059), and hyponatremia (0% vs. 16.4%, P=0.0027), compared with the triweekly PF group, resulting in fewer IndCT interruptions (1.8% vs. 16.4%, P=0.0203), emergency room visits (0% vs. 12.7%, P=0.0128), and additional hospitalizations (0% vs. 9.1%, P=0.0568). The acute toxicities during IMRT period were similar. Weekly P-F arm had higher complete response rates (83.6% vs. 61.8%, P=0.0152) and lower relapse rates (16.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.0402) after a median follow-up of 67 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed a better trend of locoregional failure-free (P=0.0892), distant metastasis failure-free (P=0.0775), and progression-free (P=0.0709) survivals, favoring the weekly P-F arm.

CONCLUSION

IndCT of weekly schedule does reduce acute toxicities without compromised tumor response and survivals.

Tipifarnib enhances anti-EGFR activity of cetuximab in non-HRas mutated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cancer (HNSCC)

OBJECTIVE

To test the potential ability of tipifarnib to impair proliferation and to enhance the activity of the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab in wild-type H-Ras HNSCC, which accounts for the majority of HNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell growth, apoptosis and signaling changes in HNSCC cells following tipifarnib exposure in vitro were assessed by SRB, colony formation assay, annexin V staining and Western blot, respectively. A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) animal model was adopted to evaluate the efficacy of tipifarnib in vivo with and without cetuximab.

RESULTS

Treatment of wild-type H-Ras HNSCC cell lines in vitro with tipifarnib reduced cell growth and increased levels of defarnesylated H-Ras in a dose-dependent manner. In a PDX mouse model, treatment with single-agent tipifarnib led to only near-significant growth inhibition. The addition of cetuximab resulted in increased anti-proliferative effect both in culture and in PDX models, which was also mirrored by Western blot and apoptosis assay results.

CONCLUSION

Tipifarnib has only a moderate ability to slow tumor growth as a single agent in HNSCC with wild type H-Ras, despite specifically inhibiting the farnesyltransferase upon which the function of H-Ras depends. The combination of cetuximab and tipifarnib appears to enhance the anti-proliferative effect of single-agent tipifarnib and marginally enhance that of single agent cetuximab. These findings deserve further evaluation.

Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: balancing between beneficial and adverse effects

Introduction: Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. Almost 2/3rds of patients have recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. Treatment options for R/M HNSCC have evolved, with relatively little change in survival. Thus, it is imperative that management decisions must balance efficacy with toxicity and emphasize the importance of maintaining the patient's quality of life (QOL).Areas covered: We cover the various chemotherapeutic options available for R/M HNSCC including single agent chemotherapy, platinum-based doublets and triplet options. The role of cetuximab, immunotherapy and oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMCT) is also reviewed. We discuss the management of patients with platinum-refractory disease.Expert opinion: In all patients with R/M HNSCC, we recommend assessment of extent of disease, patient symptomatology, performance status, affordability and availability of logistic and social support. In patients with PD-L1 CPS =/> 20, pembrolizumab is an option. In patients with PD-L1 CPS < 20, pembrolizumab/cisplatin/5FU or cisplatin/5FU/cetuximab (EXTREME) may be considered based on affordability and availability. Options available that have a lower toxicity and can help to maintain the patient's QOL include; single agent chemotherapy, carboplatin/paclitaxel combination chemotherapy, sequential combination chemotherapy followed by cetuximab, replacing 5FU with docetaxel (TPEx regime) and OMCT.

Management of recurrent and metastatic oral cavity cancer: Raising the bar a step higher

In recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN), the armamentarium of systemic anti-cancer modalities continues to grow in parallel with innovations in and better integration of local approaches. The backbone of cytotoxic chemotherapy remains cisplatin with 5-fluorouracil or a taxane. In contrast to cisplatin, the tumoricidal activity of carboplatin monotherapy is debatable. Adding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab to a platinum/5-fluorouracil doublet (the so-called EXTREME regimen) produced a statistically but also clinically significant improvement of survival and became thus the standard first-line palliative treatment in adequately fit patients. Interestingly, three large randomized trials (EXTREME, SPECTRUM, and ZALUTE) evaluating different anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab, and zalutumumab, respectively) demonstrated preferential anti-tumour efficacy in patients with primary cancer in the oral cavity. Modern immunotherapy with immunomodulating antibodies, dubbed immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, showed unprecedented activity in one first-line (KEYNOTE-048) and several second-line trials (CheckMate-141, KEYNOTE-012, KEYNOTE-055, and KEYNOTE-040). In a minority of also heavily-pretreated patients, these agents generate long-lasting responses without the typical chemotherapy-related toxicity, however, at a price of a low overall response rate, rare but potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events, the risk of hyperprogression, and high costs. In oligometastatic disease, emerging data indicate long-term benefit with locally ablative techniques including metastasectomy and stereotactic radiotherapy of pulmonary but also hepatic and other distant lesions. In the frame of highly-individualized cancer care, a particularly intriguing approach is a combination of systemic and local therapies.

Sequential alterations of Stensen's duct and parotid gland after radical surgeries in buccal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The marsupialization of Stensen's duct after buccal cancer excision and free flap reconstruction has seldom been reported. In this study, we evaluated the alteration in Stensen's duct and parotid gland, without marsupialization or relocation, between the time of surgery and 24 months postoperatively to determine whether ductal management is needed in patients with buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC).

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with BSCC receiving primary radical surgery and free flap reconstruction were recruited. Alterations in Stensen's duct and parotid gland were assessed by computed tomography during the postoperative period.

RESULTS

The 81 males and 4 females enrolled in study had a tumor status of cT2 (n = 52, 61%) or cT3 (n = 33, 39%). In total, 52 (61%) patients received surgery alone, and 33 (39%) received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) postoperatively. Stensen's duct on the affected side was significantly dilated compared to the non-affected side (p < 0.001). The difference in diameter of Stensen's duct between the surgery plus CCRT group and the surgery alone group was not significant (p > 0.05), indicating that changes in parotid gland occurred mainly due to surgery. In both the surgery and surgery plus CCRT groups, inflammation of parotid gland had regressed by 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Stensen's duct in BSCC dilatation peaked in the 3rd month after surgery. Changes in parotid gland on the surgically treated side regressed into fatty change by 24 months after surgery.

Cisplatin, Epirubicin and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland

Nine patients (5 males, 4 females; median age, 62 years) with recurrent high-grade malignancies of major (7 cases) and minor (2 cases) salivary gland origin (4 adenoid cystic carcinomas, 2 adenocarcinomas, 2 poorly differentiated carcinomas, 1 mixed malignant tumor) were treated with cisplatin (60 mg/m2), epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) (CEF) by intravenous injections on the first day of a 21-day regimen. Previous therapy included surgery (1 case), radiotherapy (1 case), and surgery+radiotherapy (7 cases). There was 1, complete response (11.1%), 3 partial responses (33.3%), 2 unchanged lesions (22.2%) and 3 progressions (33.3%). Patients with local recurrence had a better response. Median remission duration was 7.5 months in CR + PR patients. Median overall survival was 8+ months; 14+ months for responders and 4 months for nonresponders. The major toxic effects were nausea/vomiting and alopecia; myelosuppression was less frequent and usually not severe.

External Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Tonsillar Carcinomas. Analysis of 183 Cases

A retrospective analysis of 183 consecutive patients with tonsillar carcinoma obserevd from 1970 through 1984 and treated by external radiotherapy was carried out. The data were analyzed retrospectively to determine the factors affecting prognosis. Tumor size (T) and lymph node involvement (N) were found to be predominant prognostic factors. The difference in 5 year survival rate between T2 and T3 tumors was significant, and that between N1 and N3 was highly significant, whereas difference in survival could be found between N0 and N1 groups. The primary tumor was controlled by radiotherapy alone in 90% of cases of T1 lesions, 58% of T2, 37% of T3 and 11% of T4, and lymph node metastases was controlled in 70% of N1 cases, 0 of N2 and 15.5% of N3. Twenty-three patients underwent salvage surgery after radiotherapy had failed and the actuarial 5 year survival rate was 75% for stage I, 40% for stage II, 30% for stage III and 13% for stage IV.

Failure of Second-Line Therapy to Modify Survival in Relapsed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Between August 1979 and August 1984, 47 consecutive patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck entered one of three consecutive second-line treatments. Response rates with each treatment were very different (70 % vs 5.9 % vs 75 %), but there was no statistical difference in actuarial survival (survival: 30 % vs 29 % vs 20 %, respectively, at 260 days). In light of this observation, the efficacy of the second-line therapy appears doubtful and the survival of relapsing patients seems unrelated to the response achieved.

Current Treatment Options for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This review highlights the evidence-based data to support current best management practices for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Current limitations and areas of emerging therapeutics are also emphasized. The cornerstone of palliation for patients with R/M HNSCC is a platinum-based backbone. Platinum doublets induce higher response rates than single agents but do not demonstrate a survival advantage and are associated with increased toxicity. The only regimen to demonstrate survival superiority is platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EGFR inhibitors, including monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have achieved only modest success in R/M HNSCC, illustrating the importance of identifying predictive biomarkers and finding ways to overcome mechanisms of resistance. Although phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway alterations are present at a high rate in HNSCC, the identification of efficacious agents in patients with activating alterations has yet to be discovered. Immunotherapy represents an attractive treatment strategy for R/M HNSCC, with promising preliminary data from studies involving immune checkpoint blockade and toll-like receptor agonists. Human papillomavirus has a prognostic role in R/M disease; therefore, stratification of patients by human papillomavirus status in clinical trials is indicated. Although under-represented in clinical trials, elderly patients experience similar survival outcomes compared with younger patients, albeit with increased toxicity. Despite therapeutic advances, prognosis nonetheless remains poor for patients with R/M HNSCC. Enrollment of patients onto clinical trials to investigate novel therapeutics and identify predictive biomarkers is necessary to further refine and improve outcomes.

Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Options for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck

Recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is a devastating malignancy with a poor prognosis. Treatment is limited to chemotherapeutic approaches. Cisplatin is an established and effective treatment for R/M HNSCC, and many studies have investigated cisplatin treatment in combination with other agents. Even when being treated with first line therapy (cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + cetuximab), overall survival is only 10 months, indicating the need for novel chemotherapeutics and treatment regimens. Current research is focused on molecular targeting therapies inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphoinositide-3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin, and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. A variety of clinical trials have been completed and are currently underway with encouraging results. Finally, future directions of cisplatin-based R/M HNSCC treatment may include targeting specific pathways known to induce cisplatin resistance, such as nucleotide excision repair and inhibition of apoptosis, in hopes to enhance response to cisplatin therapy.

The efficacy and toxicity of S-1 and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical activity and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy regimen of S-1 and cisplatin in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in a retrospective study.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients were treated in an outpatient setting with S-1 80 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and with cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles as a first-line palliative chemotherapy. Patients who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) after six cycles received S-1 monotherapy as a maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 55 years (range 33-79), 89.8 % were male, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status distribution was 0/1/2 (20.4 %/73.5 %/6.1 %). Of the 43 evaluable patients, 2 (4.1 %) achieved CR and 20 (40.8 %) had a PR, for an overall response rate of 44.9 %. Thirteen patients (26.6 %) had SD. The median number of chemotherapy treatments was 4 (range 1-18). Nine patients received maintenance S-1 monotherapy after six cycles of combination chemotherapy. With a mean 10.5 months (range 1.3-25.1) of follow-up, the median progression-free and overall survival were 4.5 (95 % CI, 3.7-5.3 months) and 10.8 months (95 % CI, 5.9-15.6 months), respectively. The main grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (37 %), anemia (16 %) and general weakness (8 %). Other toxicities, including nausea/vomiting, mucositis and neuropathy, were mostly grade 1-2 and easily manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of S-1/cisplatin therapy had a favorable efficacy with manageable toxicity as a first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Current treatment options for metastatic head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is now the 8th most common cancer affecting men in the United States largely due to a rising epidemic of oropharynx cancer (tonsil and tongue base) associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The median overall survival for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNSCC) remains less than 1 year despite modern chemotherapy and targeted agents. Palliative chemotherapy and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, cetuximab, constitute the backbone of treatment for patients with R/M HNSCC. Platinum doublets studied in phase III trials include cisplatin/5-FU, cisplatin/paclitaxel, and cisplatin/pemetrexed. Platinum chemotherapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil and cetuximab has resulted in the longest median overall survival. Combination platinum regimens increase response rates and toxicity but not survival and should be reserved for patients who are symptomatic from their disease for whom the benefit of a partial response may be worth the cost of increased treatment-related side effects. For many patients who are asymptomatic with a low disease burden, single agent regimens are appropriate to balance treatment with side effects. Drugs commonly used as single agents in the treatment of R/M HNSCC include docetaxel, paclitaxel, cetuximab, capecitabine, pemetrexed, and methotrexate. Best supportive care alone is often appropriate for poor performance status patients. Palliative radiation therapy is beneficial for treating symptomatic metastatic sites. Aggressive symptom management is imperative for all patients and often should include referral to experts in palliative care and pain management. New therapies currently under investigation include mTOR inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, and IGF1R inhibitors. Given the poor prognosis for most patients with R/M HNSCC, enrollment in clinical trials investigating novel approaches to therapy should be encouraged.

Management of head and neck cancer in elderly patients

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents a heterogeneous group of tumours requiring multimodality approaches. It is debatable whether HNC treatment in geriatric patients should be different to that delivered for younger patients. Furthermore, the risk of death seems to be higher in HNC patients with higher co-morbidity status. Despite the fact that there is no significant difference in outcome in younger versus older patients, older HNC patients are more likely to receive nonstandard, less aggressive therapies than younger patients. Age alone should not be the basis for selecting treatment options in older HNC patients. A thorough pretreatment evaluation of co-morbidities should always be performed, and radical surgical options should not be excluded in older HNC patients treated with curative intent, as postoperative complications occur no more frequently in older patients than in younger patients. Locoregional control and disease-free survival in older patients treated with radiation therapy (either with curative intent or in the palliative setting) are comparable to the results seen in younger HNC patients, with the same acute toxicity profile. In patients receiving systemic therapies, special attention must be given to modification of chemotherapy dosages according to renal and hepatic function. Molecular-targeted therapies appear to be very useful in such patients because of their favourable tolerability. In conclusion, once all physiological and biological risk factors have been addressed, a large proportion of geriatric patients can and should be offered the same HNC treatment as is offered to younger patients.

Safety and efficacy of S-1 chemotherapy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer

S-1 is an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) anticancer agent and has shown promising effects in the treatment of a wide range of carcinomas, including head and neck cancer. In addition to being used as adjuvant chemotherapy, S-1 is a promising agent for palliative treatment. Its ease of administration makes it an ideal drug to treat patients in the outpatient setting while maintaining adequate quality of life. However, the clinical role of S-1 in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer is still uncertain. We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer who received S-1 monotherapy. Thirteen patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 3 patients with non-SCC who had recurrent/metastatic disease received S-1 monotherapy as outpatients. One patient with nasopharyngeal undifferentiated carcinoma and 1 patient with maxillary adenosquamous carcinoma showed complete response (CR), while all SCC patients showed stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). Median time to progression (TTP) was 12 weeks. Five patients showed grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions, all hematological. Except for one episode of grade 4 leucopenia which required hospitalization and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) treatment, all adverse events resolved with dose reduction or dose omission. S-1 was safely administered in outpatients and showed some efficacy in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer in patients who had received previous chemotherapy. S-1 could be used as palliative treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.

Evaluation of the Combination of Docetaxel/Carboplatin in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN): A Southwest Oncology Group Phase II Study

Carboplatin/docetaxel chemotherapy was evaluated in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Eligibility included patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic SCCHN with Zubrod performance status 0-2. Docetaxel 65 mg/m(2) and carboplatin (AUC of 6) were given IV in a 21-day cycle to 68 patients. Response probability was 25 percent (95%CI: 15-38). The major toxicity observed was neutropenia, with 36 patients (61 percent) experiencing Grade 3 or worse. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 months (95%CI, 3.1-4.8) Median overall survival was 7.4 months (95%CI, 6.2-8.9). The results of this study suggest this regimen is active for outpatient treatment of recurrent SCCHN patients with good performance status.

Phase II study of 3-AP Triapine in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are limited with response rates to cytotoxic chemotherapy of approximately 30% and median survival of 6 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a multicentre phase II study, 32 patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC received 3-AP Triapine (3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, 96 mg/m2, daily for 4 days every 14 days (one cycle). Eligibility criteria required Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of zero to two with a life expectancy of >3 months; one prior chemotherapy regimen was allowed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Median age was 57 years (range 36-79) and median ECOG PS was one (range 0-2). Thirteen patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy. A total of 130 cycles were administered with a median number of cycles of 3.5 (range 1-8). Mild anaemia (40%), nausea (22%) and fatigue (22%) were commonly reported with G3 and G4 neutropenia documented in 22% and 22%, respectively. Overall response rate was 5.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 28.7%). One patient achieved a partial response, eight had stable disease and 21 progressive disease. Median time to disease progression was 3.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

3-AP Triapine as a single agent, at this dose and schedule, is well tolerated but has only minor activity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as reirradiation for locally recurrent head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

We report early preliminary experience with CyberKnife radiosurgery (RS) as salvage treatment for locally recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 2004 and August 2006, 36 patients (44 sites) were treated with CyberKnife RS as reirradiation for locally recurrent HNC. Treatment sites were as follows: nasopharynx (8), maxillary sinus (8), neck lymph nodes (8), skull base (7), nasal cavity (4), retropharyngeal lymph nodes (3), orbit (2), and others (4). Total doses administered were 18-40 Gy (median, 30 Gy) in 3 to 5 fractions to the 65%-85% isodose line for 3-5 consecutive days. Previous external radiation dose ranged from 39.6 to 134.4 Gy (median, 70.2 Gy). Gross tumor volume ranged from 0.2 to 114.9 cm(3) (median, 22.6 cm(3)). Median follow-up was 17.3 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 44 sites were evaluated for response. Fifteen (42.9%) sites achieved complete response, 13 sites (37.1%) achieved a partial response, 3 (8.6%) sites maintained stable disease, and 4 sites (11.4%) showed tumor progression. Grade III acute complications were noted in 13 patients. Late complications were observed in three patients (1 bone necrosis, 2 soft tissue necrosis) during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality as a salvage treatment with good short-term local control. The early overall response rate is encouraging. However, more experience and a longer follow-up are necessary to determine the role of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery as a salvage treatment of locally recurrent HNC and to define long-term complications.

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC)

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.

The challenging integration of platinum compounds, taxanes, and molecular-targeted therapies in the multidisciplinary treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

There have been important advances in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). For patients with unresectable disease, the use of platinum-based chemoradiotherapy has improved the 3-year survival rate from 15-20% to 35-50%. The results of recent studies involving sequential therapy of induction chemotherapy including taxanes and chemoradiation have shown encouraging survival rates, near to 60-70%. Moreover, progress in the understanding of the molecular changes that lead to the development of these tumors is bringing novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches into clinical practice, promising new hope to patients with a devastating and lethal disease.

Mitochondria as a critical target of the chemotheraputic agent cisplatin in head and neck cancer

Cisplatin is among the most important chemotherapeutic agents ever developed. It is a critical component of therapeutic regimens in a broad range of malignancies. However, more than a generation after its clinical introduction, the exact mechanism of cisplatin action on tumor cells is not fully defined. The preponderance of research over the last three decades has focused on cisplatin interactions with nuclear DNA which are felt to lead to apoptotic cell death in sensitive cells. However, recent data have shown that cisplatin may have important direct interactions with mitochondria which can induce apoptosis and may account for a significant portion of the clinical activity associated with this drug. These direct interactions between cisplatin and mitochondria may have critical implications for our understanding of this class of drugs and the development of new therapeutic agents.

Chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The purpose of this review is to provide readers with guidance concerning treatment of patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the context of clinical trial data. We discuss issues surrounding the treatment of patients with SCCHN, with an emphasis on recommendations based on results from phase II and III clinical trials published since 1980. Many options exist for the treatment of patients with SCCHN. The most important decisions involve determining which patients are in need of treatment and which are most likely to benefit from treatment. Although many chemotherapy treatments have been shown to induce responses, survival improvement remains an unfulfilled goal. Definitive data do not exist on the effects of chemotherapy on quality of life or progression-free survival as measures of clinical benefit in this setting. Performance status, history of prior treatment, extent of tumor, and need for palliation are the most important factors in the decision to treat a patient with chemotherapy for incurable SCCHN. Single-agent treatment with conventional doses of methotrexate remains a standard for most patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Cisplatin plus fluorouracil, cisplatin plus a taxane, and single-agent taxane are the most widely studied alternatives. There is a need for further trials with end points other than overall survival or tumor response in this patient population. Guidelines for patient selection and treatment options are provided.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II trial from an Italian cooperative group

The aim of this multicenter trial was to test the feasibility and the activity of a three-drug combination where paclitaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Patients with metastatic or relapsed SCC-HN unsuitable for further loco-regional radical treatment, not previously treated with chemotherapy, were eligible to receive paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 (3-hr infusion) day 1, CDDP 25 mg/m2/day and 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day bolus on days 1, 2, 3 every three weeks up to a maximum of five courses. Fourty-seven patients were enrolled by five Institutions in Italy. Main grade III-IV toxicities were: neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (6%), anemia (4%), diarrhea (2%), mucositis (2%). Six patients had a complete response (13.3%) and eight a partial response (17.8%). Median progression free survival and overall survival are 4.1 and 7.9 months. One-year progression free survival and overall survival are 16% and 29%. This three-drug regimen has an excellent safety profile. The activity in the palliation of recurrent SCC-HN, however, does not appear to be improved in comparison with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin and paclitaxel regimens. Recent studies indicate a more promising role of taxanes including triplets in the induction therapy of previously untreated patients.

Results of postoperative reirradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In this prospective study, the effects of a second course of postoperative radiation therapy on locoregional control, survival, toxicity, and quality of life were investigated in patients who underwent resection of a second primary or locoregional recurrent head and neck tumor in a previously irradiated area.

METHODS

In total, 39 patients who underwent surgery for second primary tumors (n = 19 patients) or for recurrent locoregional tumors (n = 20 patients) were retreated with postoperative radiotherapy (RE-PORT). Indications for RE-PORT were extranodal spread (49%), positive surgical margins (44%), and/or other risk factors (8%). The target volume for RE-PORT was confined to the high-risk area. No elective radiotherapy was applied in regions that were situated in the formerly high-dose area. A total dose of 46 grays (Gy) was given to elective areas with boosts from 60 Gy to 66 Gy to the high-risk region with conventional fractionation. The results of RE-PORT were compared with the results from patients who were treated in the same period with primary adjuvant radiotherapy (PRI-PORT) at the authors' institution.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 3-84 mos). The locoregional control rate after 3 years in the RE-PORT group was 74%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 44%. This did not differ significantly compared with survival rates in the PRI-PORT group. Although a higher rate of late radiation-induced morbidity and more head and neck symptoms were observed in the RE-PORT group compared with the PRI-PORT group, no differences were observed with regard to the more general dimensions of quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

RE-PORT after surgery for recurrent locoregional tumors and/or second primary tumors should be considered in patients who have high-risk histopathologic features.

Toxicity and outcome analysis of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer treated with hyperfractionated split-course reirradiation and concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy from two prospective phase I and II studies

BACKGROUND

Patients with local recurrences or new head and neck primary tumors in previously irradiated tissues have few options for salvage treatment. One option for select patients is to undergo reirradiation with concurrent chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to report the initial clinical results of the Fox Chase phase I and II prospective reirradiation and chemotherapy studies.

METHODS

Between July 1996 and January 2002, 38 patients with locally recurrent unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation on two prospective trials. All patients had received prior radiation therapy to the head and neck region (median dose, 64.2 Gy). Patients received cisplatin and paclitaxel along with hyperfractionated external beam radiation therapy to the site of recurrence.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 10 months. The median survival was 12.4 months, with actuarial rates of overall survival of 50% and 35% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. During follow-up, 63% of patients experienced local progression of disease, all in the irradiated field. Actuarial progression-free survival at 1 year was 33%, with a median time to progression of 7.3 months. Acute grade 3 to 4 toxicity included neutropenia, nausea, emesis, and mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperfractionated split-course reirradiation and concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy demonstrates durable locoregional control in select patients, although late toxicity may occasionally be significant. Only sites of disease recurrence need to be covered in the reirradiation fields.

Cisplatin and Continuous Infusion Fluorouracil (CF) for Head and Neck Cancers

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy heightens the requirement that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column will review various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy. It will also serve as a review of various agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Reirradiation alternating with docetaxel and cisplatin in inoperable recurrence of head-and-neck cancer: a prospective phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

Inoperable locoregional recurrences of head-and-neck cancer in a previously irradiated volume represent a therapeutic dilemma. Chemotherapy alone has no curative potential, whereas reirradiation and concurrent chemoradiation can salvage a small fraction of patients. Mucosal toxicity of concurrent chemoradiation requires substantial dose reduction of chemotherapy. Alternating chemoradiation offers the chance to give both full-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The latter may provide a particular advantage for recurrent, potentially radiation resistant tumors. The feasibility and efficacy of a full-dose docetaxel containing alternating chemoradiation schedule was tested.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients (Karnofsky performance status score >/=70%) with histologically proven recurrent squamous cell cancer that occurred >/= 6 months in a previously irradiated area (>/= 60 Gy) were considered unresectable and unsuitable for brachytherapy. Alternating chemoradiation consisted of 3 cycles of docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) d1 and cisplatin 15 mg/m(2) d2-5, q d22, and involved field radiotherapy 2.0 Gy every day d8-12, d15-19, d29-33, and d36-40 (40.0 Gy total dose). Dose reduction of docetaxel to 50 mg/m(2) was necessary, because of hematologic toxicity in the first 12 patients.

RESULTS

Alternating chemoreirradiation was applied as planned in 12 of 27 patients, with reirradiation completed per protocol in 81%. Overall, patients received 83% of the intended dose of docetaxel and 73% of cisplatin. Third-degree common toxicity criteria mucositis occurred in 15%, leukopenia of >/= third degree by common toxicity criteria in 37%, and 3 early deaths were observed. Median time to follow-up, time to local progression, median survival, and 3-year survival rates were 42 months, 10 months, 10 months, and 18%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternating chemoreirradiation in recurrences of head-and-neck cancer resulted in 80% overall response with acceptable toxicity. A significant minority of patients had durable tumor control with a chance of long-term survival.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for wound infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma surgery with opening of mucosa. Study of 260 surgical procedures

The goal of this prospective study was to determine risk factors for wound infections (WI) for patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone surgical procedures with opening of upper aerodigestive tract mucosa in multimodal therapeutic approaches. Two hundred and sixty consecutive surgical procedures were studied at Oscar Lambret Cancer Center over a 36-month period. Twenty-five variables were recorded for each patient. Statistical evaluation used chi2 test analysis (categorical data) and Mann-Whitney test (continuous variables). Multivariate analysis was performed with logistic regression model. The overall rate of WI was 45% (117/260). Univariate analysis indicated that five variables were significantly related to the likelihood of WI: male sex (p = 0.03), previous chemotherapy (p = 0.009), duration of previous hospital stay (p = 0.013), hypopharyngeal location (p = 0.003), post-laryngectomy tracheostoma (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified only one major risk factor for WI: post-laryngectomy tracheostoma (Odd Ratio 1.9 [95% CI 1.3-3]; 33% versus 64%; p = 0.001). Despite antibiotic prophylaxis, WI occurrence is high. This study identified one major risk factor, post-laryngectomy tracheostomy. Long-term curative antibiotherapy must be evaluated in cancer head and neck surgery requiring post-laryngectomy tracheostoma.

Carboplatin and tegafur-uracil concomitant with standard radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

We undertook a prospective study to determine the feasibility, toxicity, response and survival rate of simultaneous chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) for locally-advanced head and neck cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty eight patients were treated with carboplatin (i.e. 100 mg/m(2)) weekly, tegafur-uracil (UFT) (oral 400 mg/m(2)) daily and simultaneous treatment with a cobalt-60 source of radiation (total dose 65-70 Gy).

RESULTS

Forty six patients (79%) received the total dose of RT while CT was delayed or reduced in 31 patients (53%). Grade 3-4 toxicity observed was mucositis in 27 (47%), leukopenia in 10 (17%), anaemia in 5 (9%), and diarrhoea in 4 (7%) patients. The objective response rate was 74%; 24 complete response (41%) and 19 partial response (33%). Overall, there are 11 patients (19%) disease-free, 7 (12%) alive with disease, 35 have died of progressive disease (60%) and 3 (5%) from other causes. There were 2 toxic deaths (3%). Median time to progression was 10 months and median survival was 18.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of carboplatin and UFT concomitant with radiotherapy has, in our study, a slightly lower activity than other chemo-radiotherapy protocols, especially with respect to complete responses, but with no significant differences in overall survival or disease-free survival rates.

Long-Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy with Uracil-Ftegafur (UFT), Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by Radiotherapy Concomitant with UFT and Carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in a Primary Site Preservation Setting for Resectable Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Larynx and Hypopharynx

OBJECTIVE

We present long-term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy (IC) with uracilftegafur (UFT) 200 mg/m orally days 1 to 21, vinorelbine 25 mg/m intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 100 mg/m IV day 1 (UFTVP) each for 21 days for 4 courses, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m orally daily and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.5 IV weekly) (RT/ UFTJ), without surgery to the primary site if response, in patients (pts) with resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. The primary endpoint was clinical complete response (CR) to induction UFTVP, and secondary endpoints were long-term overall survival (OS) and survival with primary site preservation (SPP).

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 1997, 37 pts were included. CR to IC was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43-65%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (73% of pts, 16% developed febrile neutropenia). After IC, primary site was treated with RT in 29 pts: 20 of them received RT/UFTJ (main toxicity mucositis G 3,4 70%). No pt died during treatment. Actuarial 5-year OS and SPP were 57% and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach has significant activity and acceptable toxicity for achieving promising long-term OS and SPP and deserves further investigation.

Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients

BACKGROUND

A frequent complication of anticancer treatment, oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis, threatens the effectiveness of therapy because it leads to dose reductions, increases healthcare costs, and impairs patients' quality of life. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an international multidisciplinary panel of experts to create clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of mucositis.

METHODS

The panelists examined medical literature published from January 1966 through May 2002, presented their findings at two separate conferences, and then created a writing committee that produced two articles: the current study and another that codifies the clinical implications of the panel's findings in practice guidelines.

RESULTS

New evidence supports the view that oral mucositis is a complex process involving all the tissues and cellular elements of the mucosa. Other findings suggest that some aspects of mucositis risk may be determined genetically. GI proapoptotic and antiapoptotic gene levels change along the GI tract, perhaps explaining differences in the frequency with which mucositis occurs at different sites. Studies of mucositis incidence in clinical trials by quality and using meta-analysis techniques produced estimates of incidence that are presented herein for what to our knowledge may be a broader range of cancers than ever presented before.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the pathobiology of mucositis, its incidence, and scoring are essential for progress in research and care directed at this common side-effect of anticancer therapies.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low-dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of patients with unresectable head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using conventional radiotherapy combined with low-dose daily 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) for the locally unresectable head and neck cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 1996 through December 2000, we carried out a phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low-dose CDDP plus 5FU for the treatment of patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of irradiation with 1.6-2.0 Gy/day for 5 days per week up to a total dose 68 Gy and CDDP 3 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 1 h plus 5FU 150 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 24 h per day for 5 days per week.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of the patients had stage IV disease, including 65% of patients with T4 disease. Thirty-three patients (83%) received the full treatment as planned; 39 (98%) received full-dose radiotherapy and 33 (83%) full-dose chemotherapy. Of the 40 patients evaluable for response, 20 (50%) achieved complete response (CR) and 12 (30%) partial response with an overall response rate of 80%. Among the 20 CR patients, 15 underwent endoscopic blind biopsies and 4 had positive lesions. The most frequently observed toxicity was mucositis. Ten patients developed grade III mucositis, and 3 patients required enteral nutritional support through a feeding tube. Grade III leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 28, 25 and 20% of the patients, respectively. The median duration of follow-up at the time of analysis was 18 months. The median survival time was 23 months. The responders survived longer (34 months) than the nonresponders (4 months; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This regimen is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with advanced unresectable head and neck cancer.

Tumor treatment by sustained intratumoral release of 5-fluorouracil: effects of drug alone and in combined treatments

PURPOSE

To evaluate an intratumoral polymer implant for sustained delivery of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a mouse tumor model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

5-FU was incorporated into a polyanhydride-based polymer, bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)propane sebacic acid (CPP:SA) and implanted in RIF-1 mouse fibrosarcoma growing s.c. The effectiveness of treatment was evaluated by tumor growth delay. External beam radiation was 60Co gamma rays, and the source of interstitial radiation was implanted 125I seeds. A second drug, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (cis-DDP), was administered by intraperitoneal injection or by osmotic pump.

RESULTS

For drug/polymer implant alone, the tumor growth delay was proportional to the amount of drug in the implant. The 5-FU polymer implant was most effective when combined with cis-DDP or with acute or fractionated radiation, and in some cases, the effects of combined treatments were greater than additive. The most effective combination was intratumoral 5-FU and low-dose-rate radiation delivered from an interstitial radiation source.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that 5-FU can be effectively delivered by polymer implant and that this mode of delivery is particularly appropriate for combined treatments.

Evaluation of gemcitabine in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study

A phase II trial of gemcitabine (Gemzar), a nucleoside analogue with broad activity in solid tumors, was performed in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A total of 26 eligible patients were registered to receive a dose of 1250 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a 1 week rest. Toxicity was evaluable in 26 patients. Nausea and vomiting occured in 11 and 6 patients, repectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were infrequent. Two patients developed neutropenic infections. One patient developed fatal liver failure which was thought due to progressive liver metastases or infection 14 days after a single dose of gemcitabine. There were no objective treatment responses (95% CI 0-13%), with a median survival of 6 months in this highly resistant disease population. Gemcitabine is not considered active enough as monotherapy for further evaluation in this disease population.

RTOG 96-10: reirradiation with concurrent hydroxyurea and 5-fluorouracil in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Patients with recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCH&N) are generally treated with systemic chemotherapy. Improvement in survival has not occurred, despite an increased objective response rate. This study was undertaken to explore the feasibility and toxicity, and estimate the therapeutic impact of, reirradiation (RRT) with concurrent hydroxyurea and 5-fluorouracil.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The eligibility requirements included SCH&N presenting as a second primary or recurrence > or =6 months after definitive RT to > or =45 Gy, with > or =75% of the tumor volume within the previous field. The cumulative spinal cord dose was limited to 50 Gy, and measurable disease was required. Four weekly cycles were given, each separated by 1 week of rest. A cycle consisted of 5 days, Monday through Friday, of 1.5-Gy twice-daily repeated RT, with the fractions separated by > or =6 h, with 1.5 g of hydroxyurea given 2 h and 300 mg/m2 of a 5-fluorouracil IV bolus given 30 min before each second daily fraction.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were entered; 81 patients were assessable. The median prior radiation dose was 61.2 Gy. The 4 planned cycles were delivered in 79% of patients. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in 14% of patients, and Grade 4 in 5%. Grade 3 acute pharyngeal toxicity was seen in 17%. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 9%, Grade 4 in 10%, and Grade 5 in 7%. Six patients died of treatment-related toxicity. Two died of hemorrhage from the tumor site without thrombocytopenia. With a median follow-up of 16.3 months for living patients, the estimated median overall survival was 8.2 months and the estimated 1-year survival rate 41.7%. Patients treated >3 years after the previous RT had a 1-year survival rate of 48% compared with 35% for patients treated within 3 years (p = 0.017). The 1-year survival rate for patients with a second primary was 54% compared with 38% for patients with recurrence (p = 0.083).

CONCLUSION

Repeated RT with concurrent chemotherapy as given in this study is a feasible approach for selected, previously irradiated patients with SCH&N and may produce increased median and 1-year survival rates compared with systemic chemotherapy trials reported in the literature. A randomized study should be conducted to compare these two different approaches.

A phase II study of combined oral uracil and ftorafur with leucovorin for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The objective of this Phase II study was to define the response rate, safety profile, and toxicity of oral uracil and ftorafur (UFT) with leucovorin (UFT/LV) as a palliative treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

METHODS

Patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCHN with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 and adequate organ function were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved trial. Prior induction or adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted provided 6 months had elapsed since the last chemotherapy. Patients were treated with UFT 300 mg/m(2) per day and leucovorin 90 mg per day administered in three doses daily for 28 days followed by a 7-day break for a 35-day cycle. Planned intrapatient dose modifications were based on individual toxicity. Patients were removed from the study for progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

One hundred six cycles of UFT/LV had been administered to 42 patients as of January 1, 2000. The most common toxicities, in descending order of incidence, were anemia, pain, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, mucositis, and anorexia. Clinically significant toxicities attributable to UFT/ LV were primarily gastrointestinal. On an intent-to-treat basis, three patients (7%) achieved a complete response, and six patients (14%) achieved a partial response. The overall response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval, 10--37%).

CONCLUSIONS

UFT/LV therapy is feasible in this patient population and is generally well tolerated. Response rates are similar to the rates expected with continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil. UFT/LV should be studied further both alone and in combination therapy for patients with SCCHN.

Phase II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the current study the authors assessed the antitumor activity (including response rate, duration of response, and survival) and toxicity profile (including anorexia, fatigue, emesis, and peripheral neuropathy) of a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin (TIC) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The trial hypothesis was that the TIC therapeutic index would be as high as that of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) in this setting, but with less toxicity.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN were treated with 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion on Day 1, 1000 mg/m(2) of ifosfamide as a 2-hour infusion on Days 1-3, 600 mg/m(2) of mesna on Days 1-3, and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6) as a 30-minute infusion on Day 1; the regimen was repeated every 3-4 weeks. All patients were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine before paclitaxel infusion. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not given.

RESULTS

Among 56 patients entered onto the study, 55 patients were analyzed for survival rates (locoregional recurrence alone in 56% of patients and distant metastasis with or without locoregional recurrence in 44% of patients). Fifty-four patients were evaluable for tumor response and toxicity. A total of 32 patients (59%) had disease that responded to treatment; the complete response rate was 17% (9 of 54 patients). The median duration of the responses was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.4-7.8 months) and that of complete responses was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 months to date of last follow-up). The median duration of follow-up care in all patients was 13.5 months. The median survival time for all patients was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-12.2 months). The regimen was well tolerated. Neutropenic fever developed in 30% of the patients; 1 patient died of neutropenia and sepsis. Other toxic effects included Grade 2-3 anorexia in 13% of patients, Grade 2-3 weight loss in 11% of patients, Grade 2-3 fatigue in 27% of patients, Grade 2-3 nausea/emesis in 13% of patients, and Grade 2-3 peripheral neuropathy in 9% of patients (toxicity grading based on the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria). Red blood cell and platelet transfusions were required in 13% and 7% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The TIC regimen had high antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, with a 59% major response rate (17% complete response rate with relatively durable complete responses). Neutropenic fever developed in 30% of the patients, the incidence of which might have been decreased by prophylactic antibiotics or hematopoietic growth factor support. Other toxic effects included significantly lower rates and less severe instances of anorexia, emesis, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy than those reported with the previously studied TIP regimen. The TIC regimen currently is being studied as an induction chemotherapy regimen in previously untreated patients with locally advanced SCCHN. The activity of TIC (a novel paclitaxel and ifosfamide-based regimen) in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN should be confirmed in a Phase III randomized trial.

Survival in patients with recurrent squamous cell head and neck carcinoma treated with bio-chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

We have shown that rIL-2 administration in recurrent head and neck cancers induces a tumor-specific T-lymphocyte reactivity and tumor regression; in a pilot study we have shown a safe and effective administration of rIL2 after cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil. Long-term results are not known.

METHODS

Thirty patients with recurrent-persistent head and neck cancer were treated with cisplatin (100 mg-m(2)) d.1,5-fluorouracil (1 gr-m(2)-d c.i. 96 h), and SQ rIL-2 (4.5 M IU day 8 to 12 and 15 to 19) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 53.3% (95% CI; 34.4-72.3%): 26.6% complete response (CR) (8 patients) and 26.6% partial response (PR) (8 patients); 6 patients had SD (20%), 8 had PD (26.6%). The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 28-44). The median CR duration is 16.2 months (8.5-39+); the median survival duration of this group has not been reached. The median PR duration was 7.2 months (3-10); the median survival was 13.3 months (10-26). The median overall survival was 14 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The most impressive finding is the very long survival of CRs patients. This outcome has been reported in other cancer patients with a CR after IL-2 therapy.

Evaluation of Tomudex in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study

A phase II trial of Tomudex (raltitrexed, ZD 1694), a new thymidylate synthase inhibitor, was performed in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This trial demonstrated that Tomudex was well tolerated in this patient population. Nausea and vomiting were minimal, and hematologic toxicities were relatively infrequent. Only one patient was withdrawn from the study due to toxicity (grade 4 diarrhea). One patient exsanguinated from a rent in the carotid artery in an area of tumor involvement, and was categorized as a grade 5 toxicity. Thus 25/27 patients were able to complete at least 2 cycles of treatment. Tomudex demonstrated a 3.7% response rate (95% CI 0.1-19%), with a median survival of 6 months in this highly resistant disease population. Tomudex is not considered active enough as monotherapy for further evaluation in this disease population.

A phase I study of a fixed dose of cisplatin with increasing doses of raltitrexed (Tomudex) in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

A phase I trial of raltitrexed in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN. Cohorts of patients were treated with escalating doses of raltitrexed (2.0 mg/m2 to 3.5 mg/m2) as a 15-minute intravenous infusion immediately followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m2) administered over four hours every three weeks to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients was administered 60 courses of an escalating dose of raltitrexed. Starting dose of cisplatin was initially 100 mg/m2 in the first three patients treated at the first dose level. Due to cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity expressed as a creatinine clearance decrease by more than 50%, the cisplatin dose was reduced to 80 mg/m2 for all subsequent treatment cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at raltitrexed dose of 3.5 mg/m2 in two out of five patients. Dose-limiting grade 4 (CTC) neutropenia, grade 4 diarrhoea, grade 3 lethargy and elevation of transaminases and bilirubine was seen in these two patients. One patient treated at the level of the MTD, died 23 days after the first cycle with unresolved gastro-intestinal toxicity. In all other dose levels toxicity was very limited. The recommended dose for further study was raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2. In 15 evaluable patients, we observed 9 WHO objective responses (1 complete and 8 partial). At the recommended dose level 3 partial responses were observed in five evaluable patients.

CONCLUSION

The regimen of raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, every three weeks has manageable toxicity and these doses are recommended for phase II evaluation. Results indicate that this combination is active for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN. Recently, a phase II study has been started.

Prognostic value of c-erbB2 and other markers in patients treated with chemotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is widely used in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, but no clear markers are available that can predict response to treatment or survival in these patients.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients evaluated in this study had recurrent head and neck squamous carcinomas, previously treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients received either cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (n = 15) or cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol) (n = 14). Expression of c-erbB2, p53, glutathione S-transferase pi, multidrug resistance-associated protein, thymidylate synthase, and glutathione synthetase were evaluated in biopsy tissues.

RESULTS

Response to chemotherapy was significantly correlated with improved survival (progression-free survival, p =.0005; overall survival, p =. 007). Of the factors examined, expression of c-erbB2 was associated with significantly decreased progression-free survival (p =.023) and overall survival (p =.029). This was seen in patients treated with cisplatin/taxol but not in patients treated with cisplatin/5-FU.

CONCLUSION

Expression of c-erbB2 may be a clinically useful predictor of survival in this group of patients.

A phase II trial of palliative docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil for squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

A phase II study to determine the response rate and toxicity of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) every four weeks ('TF'), in patients with incurable SCCHN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCHN with an ECOG PS < 3 were enrolled in an institutional review board approved trial. Prior induction or adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted provided six months had elapsed. The regimen was docetaxel 70 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d x 5 days, days 1-5, as a continuous intravenous infusion, repeated every 28 days. Planned intra-patient dose modifications were based on hematological, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal toxicities. Patients were removed from the study for progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were enrolled. Fourty-six cycles of TF were administered. Reasons for discontinuance of TF included: progressive disease, 12 patients; toxicity, 3 patients; concomitant illness, 1 patient; death, 1 patient. The most common toxicities were neutropenia, mucositis, anemia, fatigue, alopecia, pain, diarrhea and nausea. Evaluation of responses to TF showed that there were four patients of seventeen (24%, 95% exact CI: 6.8-49.9) who achieved a PR or CR. Accrual was terminated after interim analysis of the response rate of the first 17 patients failed to exceed 4 of 17.

CONCLUSIONS

The response rate to TF in patients with SCCHN was lower than expected. Trials of other regimens should take precedence over further exploration of the TF regimen.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and histological response, resectability, and survival in patients with cervical epidermoid carcinoma stage IB2 to IIIB with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and/or radiation therapy. Between September 1989 and February 1996, 53 patients were admitted to this study. They were given three cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2/day, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2/day, ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2/day i.v., and mesna 400 mg/m2/day i.v. at hour 0 and 400 mg/m2 at hours 4 and 8 during three days every 21-28 days. We evaluated 47 patients. Global clinical response obtained was 85% {95% (CI), 75-97%, CR in 14 patients (30%) and PR in 26 patients (55%)}. Twenty-three patients underwent surgery. Six patients (13%) had a complete histological response. Median follow-up was 42 months (5-96). In resected patients, with a median follow-up of 57 months (5-96), the estimated five-year disease-free survival was 78%. Global survival estimated to 60 months was 83% for stage IB2, 70% for IIB, and 20% for IIIB. This mode of therapy offers a new option to improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer. Randomized trials are required in order to establish a definitive role for this therapeutic strategy.

Larynx preservation in head and neck cancers. A discussion of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guidelines

The management of advanced cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx has become increasingly complex as different treatment modalities, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, have been combined with the goal of improving local disease control and disease-specific survival. A union of 17 comprehensive cancer centers in the United States, the National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN), was formed in 1995 to promote state-of-the-art cancer care. To achieve this goal, multidisciplinary panels of experts from member institutions have created disease-specific practice guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of cancer patients, including those with head and neck cancers. Although detailed analysis of surgical methods and radiation techniques are beyond the scope of this article, the evolving laryngeal preservation strategies for patients with advanced, resectable hypopharyngeal or laryngeal (including supraglottic and glottic) cancers are reviewed using relevant sections of the NCCN practice guidelines as a framework for discussion.

Replication-competent herpes simplex virus vector G207 and cisplatin combination therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Replication-competent virus vectors are attractive therapeutic agents for cancer. G207, a second-generation, multimutated herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), is one such vector that is safe in primates and efficacious against human tumors in athymic mice. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequently encountered malignancy of the head and neck, and the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin is a standard treatment for recurrent head and neck cancer. In this study we examine the therapeutic potential of G207, alone and in combination with cisplatin, against squamous cell carcinoma. Human squamous cell carcinoma cell lines are sensitive to G207 replication and cytotoxicity in vitro at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01, including cisplatin sensitive (UMSCC-22A), moderately sensitive (UMSCC-38), and weakly sensitive (SQ20B) cell lines. Cisplatin did not inhibit the cytopathic effect of G207. G207 inhibited the growth of established subcutaneous head and neck tumors in athymic mice. The therapeutic effects of cisplatin and G207 in vivo were independent. However, in cisplatin-sensitive tumors (UMSCC-38), combination therapy resulted in 100% cures in contrast to 42% with G207 or 14% with cisplatin alone. We conclude that G207 should be considered for the treatment of head and neck cancer and that combination with chemotherapeutic agents may improve efficacy.